That wouldn't surprise me in the least. What I found interesting was the comments near the end that he would permit video cameras so long as the audio was muted, but that he wouldn't trust her. It sounds to me like he really quite desperately needs to consult that lawyer he has been avoiding.
1 thay cant do that thay can ban u from secarity cam on there peivet property but thay cant ban u from having secarity cam on ur property or pluplic property cus that be a fellony charge striping u of ur freedom of press a 1st amedmeth protected ativity and that open them up to charges and being sued learn ur rights the navy alredy removed a camra down that had a live feed of the ocean cus the navy started moving there got mad of the live video feed on pluplic property had it removed now the goverment and navy facing charges and a big lawsute from that guy cus he been doing it for 10 years now thay crying over it and strip him of his rights look at kent vs dulles a u.s supreme court case file from 1958 or 1968 of u.s supreme court ruling right to travel and passport restrison it was a land mark rulling
I looked up flordia laws. Look how close the trailers are and the fact they recorded audio. Florida's recording law is a "two-party consent" law, which means that all individuals involved in a private conversation must consent to any audio recording of the conversation to be legal.12 The law makes it a crime to intercept or record a "wire, oral, or electronic communication" in Florida, unless all parties to the communication consent. However, Florida law makes an exception for in-person communications when the parties do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the conversation, such as when they are engaged in conversation in a public place where they might reasonably be overheard.0 Children under the age of 18 are allowed to secretly record oral conversations if they are being physically or sexually abused.3 Florida is one of the few states that generally prohibits the recording of private conversations except in limited circumstances.4
@@emerygray5945 It's conspicuously posted, precedent regards conspicuous signage as providing notification under applicable law. The park does, however, have the right to set regulations and unlike satellite dishes and antennas for TV and radio is not prohibited by federal law from restricting them. The wiretapping law is moot here. It's a dispute between park owner and tenant, and would be civil contract law/landlord-tenant law not criminal law. If I were her, though, I'd move too, since Florida is hostile to the non-cishet non-pale at least at the legislative and gubernatorial level.
@@utubebad He got caught snooping, so instead of not creeping he banned the thing that got him caught. I'm not going to say he committed the pride flag thing without evidence, but I will say it looked like he had to rub those two brain cells together really hard to justify his actions.
"She's vengeful and hateful and mean" -> Certainly doesn't seem like it, to me. The park owners, however... well they do seem rather vengeful, and mean. And the on-air accusations they'r emaking about her seem rather hateful. The park owners are giant hypocrites with no concern for the well being of their residents. The only crimes they're interested in stopping are apparently illegal dumping.
You can tell the park owner is a real scumbag.. (allegedly) lol they’re just mad that they got caught in this woman’s yard doing something they shouldn’t be doing probably….
My guess is the people who stole your stuff is the same people who don't want you to have cameras up. That's just my opinion. If you put them inside in ur windows, they can't do anything about it. They don't want them for a reason!
@@stevepettersen3283 You should raise hell about red light traffic cameras. They are unconstitutional and we don't have them in my state after the state was sued and lost. You have to be able to face your accuser in court. Firstly there is no 'person', secondly they don't prove who was driving at the time. It just sends the ticket to the owner of the car. That also isn't legal. They don't do anything but generate revenue. They did not help with traffic control and accidents, it was mentioned when they were removing them that all they did was drain minnesotans of their money.
You’re allowed to record anything you can see in public. Anything in your yard under your security cameras is protected. If the neighbors have entered your yard, they have no expectation of privacy.
@@joltjolt5060 when you’re renting, you are the king. That’s why even the owner of the property cannot remove you without due process. All rentals are private property but their landlord does not have power over the tenants rights. Tenants do not lose their rights just because they are tenants. the whole idea that a private corporation can abuse your rights is so far from the truth. But in this case, it’s absolute law. The guy in the car obviously has no clue about the law. He didn’t even bother hiring a lawyer to find out whether he was abusing the tenants rights. If they would’ve sued him, it would’ve been much more costly for him then whatever concern he had with the cameras being in place.
@gfydrama there is no such thing as the wrong kind of picture in public. If it’s in public, it could be recorded. If your eyes can see it, you have a right to record it. It doesn’t matter if it’s sensitive to some people, if they don’t like it, they can leave. If you go to the beach, you have no expectation of privacy. If someone wants to record you on the beach they have every right to do so.
@gfydrama Taking photos is a protected 1st Amendment right. As long as you are on public property, you can take a photo of anything you like. Having a camera, and using a camera in, or on your own private residence is also protected. The property owner could say you can't have a gun, but the constitution overrides that private property rule. You cannot infringe on someone's right just because you are leasing property. The property owner has rights, but not to infringe on anyone's constitutional rights.
@@patriciaribaric3409 it doesn’t matter who owns the property, when you rent a property as a residential unit it is your castle. The owner has no power there. It’s hard to believe people make it through school with so little knowledge.
He probably should talk to his lawyer a little more often. One of the first things he would probably say is 'don't slander a tenant, especially when on local tv.' I'm guessing she's going to be driving a nice Cadillac pretty soon.
Yup, it would have been better to have consulted an attorney before sending out that notice. Generally, to comply with two-party laws, notice (via conspicuously posted signs) is sufficient. I wouldn't trust anyone who doesn't want cameras (recording both video and audio). Those trail cameras are garbage, certainly not a reasonable alternative to the ones the lady had prior to the removal notice. Any thief can remove those trail cameras from the posts to which their merely tied. In the end, she made the right decision by preparing to move from there.
Guys, don't get it twisted. This WOMAN knows who tf she is. She's not trying to be a man, she just has no desire to be in a relationship with a man. Save that bull crap for confused ppl.
Maybe the park owner is doing things to other people's property that he doesn't want recorded. I would be suspicious of park owner, his family and friends.
"...because she's vengeful and hateful and mean." Why does this grown man sound like such a big baby? Something very slimy about that park owner. Sounds like he and this lady have some kind of pre-existing beef that led to him poking around under and behind her trailer. She never said whether she got any explanation as to what they were doing that day.
"I heard it was a felony" "Have not talked to anybody" "I read the law" Okay so did you hear it or did you read it..... And if you've not talked to anybody that understands the law then who did you hear it from????
@@TEverettReynolds Because the trailer park belongs to him. He can be held responsible if people are committing crimes on his property and he is aware of it. A buddy of mine was charged with aiding and abetting because he rented out a storage room to a guy and it turned out the guy was a drug dealer and was storing meth in there. The judge dismissed his case because the room had its own entrance with its own lock/key. That being said, the trailer park owner seemed more like he was using the law as a reason to harass her about her cameras, rather than actually being concerned about his own culpability. I just wanted to clarify why someone would legitimately care.
Just like the park police in Davie, Florida mobile home parks who would stalk and harass residents, peeking in windows on children and evicting those they don't like.
Peeking in windows, thats when you flash a gun at them and they will go away lol. Perfectly legal if your in your own home and an unidentified person is messing with your windows. Only illegal if you shoot out of your house from inside or shoot without warning.
I was a federal Law Enforcement Officer and for 10 years a Florida resident. Florida is NOT a 2 party state for audio recording in public. Legal to record in Disney World and legal to record dash cams in your car because you are in public. There isn't expectation of privacy in public. There is expectation of privacy in a private office etc...
Yea no! I wish a MF would tell me. I have no issues going to court. These are hate crimes and people need to be investigated. A home is supposed to be your retreat. An she’s a veteran.
Supreme court says you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your house if you leave the blinds open. If you can see it from a public space, such as street or sidewalk, it's allowed to be recorded. Same for yards. Katz vs. United States
Yep. That's exactly what I was thinking. It's kind of a common sense rule when everyone has a camera nowadays. The thing the property owner is going to say it that he owns the property and he is somehow allowed to infringe a person's civil rights because it is "private property." Even though the civil rights are specifically supposed to protect a person from the government, it also applies to a-holes who think that because they own property, they somehow own the person leasing space on it.
Totally. That's why she's allowed to shoot someone for trespassing. She's just not allowed to record the audio of her doing so. Gotta love the way the law works.
I’m so glad that the management for my trailer park doesn’t care about people putting security cameras. I have 8 cameras, 2 on each side and they’ve worked very great for me.
That doesn't work well. I have a camera inside my front window. During the day it's great but not at night. You can't use the IR night vision because the IR reflection off the window blinds the camera.
She's vengeful and hateful and mean? She should sue the park owners for infringement on her right to privacy, retaliating against her after she recorded them on her property, and slander for calling her vengeful, hateful, and mean. I bet they're the ones that cut down the pride flag. That's more a hate crime than a theft.
I always love it when people are so smart they don't even know to keep their mouth shut, I would imagine his last statements going to end up costing him a lot of money.
It's the Dunning-Kruger effect: the least bright people are the most confident in their assessment of their intellect while the really intelligent ones are the least confident and the most aware of what they don't know, therefore open to new information. There are more of the former than the latter in the US.
Johnny needs to put cameras in every one of her Windows facing out on her property. In an attempt to cover her entire property like she wants to. If they're inside her home that is her private property and she has the right to do so
I would hold the park liable then for any further damage to he property then. She has a right to protect her home. If they are going to keep her from that, then they need to be liable. I would get a lawyer and hire and a security firm.
Now you know, if you ever go to live on a mobile home park or similar place, ask them what their policy is for security cameras before you sign anything. If they say "you can't have cameras" or "you can't record audio" and cite some law, you can use your smartphone to fact-check the owner in real time and immediately know if he's lying before his mouth even stops moving.
"vengeful hateful and mean" You have no idea , he left out Exhausted, Bullied, but my favorite : Nothing-to-lose . I commend her restraint, honorary bull dagger, Sister in Pride.
Before i bought a house i lived in a mobile home park and i was robbed.i called the police and even though everyone was outside nobody saw anything. I immediately put up high end cameras. The landlord told me to take them down. I told him that unless they installed cameras to catch the thiefs I'm keeping them up. 2weeks later my cameras caught a thief breaking into my truck and I used the video as evidence in court. And then 1 month later another person broke into my truck and the cops did nothing until the following day when they came back to inform me that a car shop was robbed the same night by the same person so back to court I went with more video evidence. The funny thing is that when everyone realized that the cameras were real the partying throughout the night stopped near my place. And most of the neighbors agreed that they also should put up cameras. The landlord was getting calls from the annoying people about the cameras but the crime dropped to zero and the partying all night stopped and the dealers moved out. (Deer cams can be jammed but hardwired cameras cant be jammed to my knowledge.) I have cameras around my house now and any future place i get will have cameras installed.
You claim to have "read the law" about having a recording device yet you clearly lied but she 's the one who "cant be trusted" and you put a trail-cam in her back yard and a camera to watch people throwing away their garbage but shes the one who is "vengeful , hateful and mean "? smdh
She could mount the cameras inside the home pointing out the windows, audio would cease to be an issue since it could only record sounds from within her home.
They must be related to the owner of our trailer court. His favorite thing to do is get drunk and ride around on his quad, yelling at people for things he lets other people do. For us, he keeps threatening to evict us because of the dog we got, that he approved of. I tried to get it in writing but he refused, now I know it's because it gives him something to throw a tantrum about. He also yells at one of my neighbor's because she has a camper in her driveway, which so many other people have, but he also like to tell her it's bothering us, when we have already told her that we like it parked there because it stops the sun from shining straight into our living room. Everyone here is sick and tired of him, except two old ladies who walk around all day, looking for things to go to him and tattle about, everyone is sick of them as well. He's a real life Lahey, except when you start standing up for yourself, this one takes off on his quad because he doesn't want to hear it.
No, he's only one person out of so many here and we get along with the rest of them (except his two narcs). I love it here because everyone treats everyone else like family.
"residents of mobile home parks should band together and buy the park and run as a co-op" Perhaps you can post some details of how that would work; where would they get the millions of dollars to buy it; who would be the trustees and it would then be just like a HOA (homeowners association) and instead of a park owner that does not like you but takes your money, now it is your neighbor that does not like you.
Ha ha. They each pay out to rent most of their government handouts. This person is able to move due to her previous service thus getting larger check. Also if they owned stuff they would not qualify for assistance and be homeless soon...
That’s crazy, as long as her cameras are not peeping in on her neighbors private yard, but if the cameras are in public area, or just her yard…. What the problem..if it because of sound, disable the sound part…
She is better off just moving elsewhere I think. You can't reason with idiots like them. It sucks she is treated that way but she is better off just going somewhere else that won't be so unreasonable or hateful.
I'm not taking the trailer park's side on this but - if there's such a problem, then she either needs to find another trailer park where she can have her cameras up and be away from the person who owns this trailer park or she will need to talk to a lawyer. I'm not a fan of anyone in the QT+ community as I do find most of them entitled and arrogant, but as someone in business law here from a legal standpoint, this is what I know; she can have cameras on her property. As long as it's attached to her house the owners of the trailer park can't stop her from recording. She can sue for that. Those saying that the owner slandered her however - defamation would be hard to prove even if it was recorded because his word against hers, he could explain that it was his opinion. Calling her hateful, vengeful and mean is an opinion. If he were to slander her by saying something that's not true like for example only; "she kicks puppies on Monday and Tuesdays." It's a poor example but, that's slander. Calling her hateful, vengeful would not constitute. Now, I do know that some trailer parks here do not allow you to hang up flags. That has been fought in court and has been ruled as unconstitutional. The owner of the park is shady. I would say that she isn't the problem but if I wa sher, I'd still move...especially since the owner seems extremely shady.
Umm.....taking away someones ability to feel safe in their own home, especially in a state with a lot of crime is absolutely insane to me. This seems so sketch. Shes not trying to protect herself
Reminds me of when cops didn't want body cameras... And oddly enough the cops with the most complaints of abuse and assault were the ones who most loudly against it... Hmmm...
After watching your video my conclusion of the situation is that homeowner you were speaking to has been targeted by the trailer park owner the one you were speaking to in the car he is the one that put the slur on the trailer and stole her stuff he does not agree with her lifestyle and has been harassing her to get rid of her he even slandered her saying that she was hateful vindictive personally I would like to see everybody move out of that trailer park and no one ever move back in that's exactly what the owners deserve
IMHO if the property owners don't want security cameras they are most likely responsible for the thefts and harassment.
💯
🙃
That wouldn't surprise me in the least. What I found interesting was the comments near the end that he would permit video cameras so long as the audio was muted, but that he wouldn't trust her. It sounds to me like he really quite desperately needs to consult that lawyer he has been avoiding.
@@bobbun9630 He is looking for a lawsuit and one or more maybe coming his way.
1 thay cant do that thay can ban u from secarity cam on there peivet property but thay cant ban u from having secarity cam on ur property or pluplic property cus that be a fellony charge striping u of ur freedom of press a 1st amedmeth protected ativity and that open them up to charges and being sued learn ur rights the navy alredy removed a camra down that had a live feed of the ocean cus the navy started moving there got mad of the live video feed on pluplic property had it removed now the goverment and navy facing charges and a big lawsute from that guy cus he been doing it for 10 years now thay crying over it and strip him of his rights look at kent vs dulles a u.s supreme court case file from 1958 or 1968 of u.s supreme court ruling right to travel and passport restrison it was a land mark rulling
That park owner seems shady as hell.
They all are
Always are. Not sure why people want to live in those.
@@DottonTuffin Probably the only place they can afford.
@@VanquishMediaDEits all by choice or forced choice. I would rather live in a house. & have to clean up after cats & dogs that aren't mine.
@@bucktooth002 Not my problem either way.
Sounds like the park owners are breaking in peoples homes and doing criminal things…seems odd..
Verry odd
That's my thoughts too! Why else would they not want cameras up?
@wet, Thats what I said before I saw on here they went in her yard and under her trailer
It's the park owners or their proxy committing the crimes and they don't want any evidence of it. Guarantee it.
the owner looks like a ped- ... just say-en ...
They don't want cameras because they're doing something they don't want seen.
🎯
Or heard....
I looked up flordia laws. Look how close the trailers are and the fact they recorded audio.
Florida's recording law is a "two-party consent" law, which means that all individuals involved in a private conversation must consent to any audio recording of the conversation to be legal.12 The law makes it a crime to intercept or record a "wire, oral, or electronic communication" in Florida, unless all parties to the communication consent. However, Florida law makes an exception for in-person communications when the parties do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the conversation, such as when they are engaged in conversation in a public place where they might reasonably be overheard.0 Children under the age of 18 are allowed to secretly record oral conversations if they are being physically or sexually abused.3 Florida is one of the few states that generally prohibits the recording of private conversations except in limited circumstances.4
@@emerygray5945 It's conspicuously posted, precedent regards conspicuous signage as providing notification under applicable law. The park does, however, have the right to set regulations and unlike satellite dishes and antennas for TV and radio is not prohibited by federal law from restricting them. The wiretapping law is moot here. It's a dispute between park owner and tenant, and would be civil contract law/landlord-tenant law not criminal law. If I were her, though, I'd move too, since Florida is hostile to the non-cishet non-pale at least at the legislative and gubernatorial level.
@@utubebad He got caught snooping, so instead of not creeping he banned the thing that got him caught. I'm not going to say he committed the pride flag thing without evidence, but I will say it looked like he had to rub those two brain cells together really hard to justify his actions.
"She's vengeful and hateful and mean" -> Certainly doesn't seem like it, to me. The park owners, however... well they do seem rather vengeful, and mean. And the on-air accusations they'r emaking about her seem rather hateful. The park owners are giant hypocrites with no concern for the well being of their residents. The only crimes they're interested in stopping are apparently illegal dumping.
It's the park owners or their proxy committing the crimes and they don't want any evidence of it. Guarantee it.
@@derekd1510 Agree
“It actually doesn’t take much to be considered a difficult woman. That’s why there are so many of us." Jane Goodall”
At this point I would say any vengeful and hateful conduct on her part (within the law, of course) may be justified!
He slandered her on camera.
Women who stand up for themselves and won't take crap from anyone are often labeled as hateful and mean.
Or witches
They usually are.
“It actually doesn’t take much to be considered a difficult woman. That’s why there are so many of us." Jane Goodall”
@@nicholashenderson6941 how to say you're a misogynist prick without saying you're a misogynist prick
@@LibbyRal 💯🎯💯🎯
You can tell the park owner is a real scumbag.. (allegedly) lol they’re just mad that they got caught in this woman’s yard doing something they shouldn’t be doing probably….
He sounds like a moron. I would hate to be renting from that turd.
🎯
The moment you see management entering the back yard without notice, you see who is the issue
My guess is the people who stole your stuff is the same people who don't want you to have cameras up. That's just my opinion. If you put them inside in ur windows, they can't do anything about it. They don't want them for a reason!
Just like people who raise hell about red light traffic cameras.
@@stevepettersen3283 You should raise hell about red light traffic cameras. They are unconstitutional and we don't have them in my state after the state was sued and lost. You have to be able to face your accuser in court. Firstly there is no 'person', secondly they don't prove who was driving at the time. It just sends the ticket to the owner of the car. That also isn't legal. They don't do anything but generate revenue. They did not help with traffic control and accidents, it was mentioned when they were removing them that all they did was drain minnesotans of their money.
sounds kinda like it!👻
You’re allowed to record anything you can see in public. Anything in your yard under your security cameras is protected. If the neighbors have entered your yard, they have no expectation of privacy.
@@joltjolt5060 when you’re renting, you are the king. That’s why even the owner of the property cannot remove you without due process. All rentals are private property but their landlord does not have power over the tenants rights. Tenants do not lose their rights just because they are tenants. the whole idea that a private corporation can abuse your rights is so far from the truth. But in this case, it’s absolute law. The guy in the car obviously has no clue about the law. He didn’t even bother hiring a lawyer to find out whether he was abusing the tenants rights. If they would’ve sued him, it would’ve been much more costly for him then whatever concern he had with the cameras being in place.
@gfydrama there is no such thing as the wrong kind of picture in public. If it’s in public, it could be recorded. If your eyes can see it, you have a right to record it. It doesn’t matter if it’s sensitive to some people, if they don’t like it, they can leave. If you go to the beach, you have no expectation of privacy. If someone wants to record you on the beach they have every right to do so.
@gfydrama Taking photos is a protected 1st Amendment right. As long as you are on public property, you can take a photo of anything you like. Having a camera, and using a camera in, or on your own private residence is also protected. The property owner could say you can't have a gun, but the constitution overrides that private property rule. You cannot infringe on someone's right just because you are leasing property. The property owner has rights, but not to infringe on anyone's constitutional rights.
It's not public. It's a private community where the land is owned by the man who owns the mobile home park.
@@patriciaribaric3409 it doesn’t matter who owns the property, when you rent a property as a residential unit it is your castle. The owner has no power there. It’s hard to believe people make it through school with so little knowledge.
He probably should talk to his lawyer a little more often. One of the first things he would probably say is 'don't slander a tenant, especially when on local tv.' I'm guessing she's going to be driving a nice Cadillac pretty soon.
HESHE should
@@thomasgentry6201 !!!
@@jasonrodgers9063 Just confused . Obviously heshe also.
Yup, it would have been better to have consulted an attorney before sending out that notice. Generally, to comply with two-party laws, notice (via conspicuously posted signs) is sufficient. I wouldn't trust anyone who doesn't want cameras (recording both video and audio). Those trail cameras are garbage, certainly not a reasonable alternative to the ones the lady had prior to the removal notice. Any thief can remove those trail cameras from the posts to which their merely tied. In the end, she made the right decision by preparing to move from there.
Guys, don't get it twisted. This WOMAN knows who tf she is. She's not trying to be a man, she just has no desire to be in a relationship with a man. Save that bull crap for confused ppl.
Maybe the park owner is doing things to other people's property that he doesn't want recorded. I would be suspicious of park owner, his family and friends.
💯👍
"...because she's vengeful and hateful and mean." Why does this grown man sound like such a big baby?
Something very slimy about that park owner. Sounds like he and this lady have some kind of pre-existing beef that led to him poking around under and behind her trailer. She never said whether she got any explanation as to what they were doing that day.
It's the park owners or their proxy committing the crimes and they don't want any evidence of it. Guarantee it.
He is also assuming she can't be trusted, he has no proof so his statement is ridiculous and makes him sound like the uneducated person he is.
Looks like the park owners are the ones going on to people's properties. They didn't want to get caught stealing tools.
When all your neighbors are criminals you get out voted on anything that might document their behavior 😆
I'd put more cameras up.they must be crazy
I'd put up hidden cameras...
@@derekd1510 I wouldn't id put them up and dare your bitch ass to take em down ONCE
Forida in a tranny park no way.
Criminals in a trailer park? I'm shocked, simply shocked!
"I heard it was a felony"
"Have not talked to anybody"
"I read the law"
Okay so did you hear it or did you read it..... And if you've not talked to anybody that understands the law then who did you hear it from????
THIS!
Can we cite that statute?
I think one "cease and desist" letter would normally shut up scumbags like this, unless they're stupid.
Even if its a felon, why does HE care... she is the one the cops would charge... so... why does he care again?
@@TEverettReynolds Because the trailer park belongs to him. He can be held responsible if people are committing crimes on his property and he is aware of it. A buddy of mine was charged with aiding and abetting because he rented out a storage room to a guy and it turned out the guy was a drug dealer and was storing meth in there. The judge dismissed his case because the room had its own entrance with its own lock/key.
That being said, the trailer park owner seemed more like he was using the law as a reason to harass her about her cameras, rather than actually being concerned about his own culpability. I just wanted to clarify why someone would legitimately care.
Seems she should not have to look any further than the park owner/manager to find out who stole her stuff and defaced her property.
It sounds like they’re discriminating against her! I’m so sorry to hear she lost her wife 😢
It's Florida. America's schlong.
Oh hell yeah.
"Lets get the lesbians out".
She needs to mount her cameras inside her property.
There's something they're not telling us about this case.
Yes, something sounds waaaay off, here.
yeah, Hate crime, Park management hates LGBTQ Community.
Something's really missing for sure.
Just like the park police in Davie, Florida mobile home parks who would stalk and harass residents, peeking in windows on children and evicting those they don't like.
Same with MINERVA MHP in haines city fl
Peeking in windows, thats when you flash a gun at them and they will go away lol. Perfectly legal if your in your own home and an unidentified person is messing with your windows. Only illegal if you shoot out of your house from inside or shoot without warning.
Sounds like the owners of the park are the thieves and want no proof of their crimes.
Nah, just trans and homophobic. And don't want audio records of that.
I was a federal Law Enforcement Officer and for 10 years a Florida resident. Florida is NOT a 2 party state for audio recording in public. Legal to record in Disney World and legal to record dash cams in your car because you are in public. There isn't expectation of privacy in public. There is expectation of privacy in a private office etc...
Yea no! I wish a MF would tell me. I have no issues going to court. These are hate crimes and people need to be investigated. A home is supposed to be your retreat. An she’s a veteran.
Can you define what she means?
His property. The court date would be so you can find out when you have to be off the property. Do you know Florida law?
Set the cameras up inside the mobile home facing out of the windows.
That's what I thought
Too easy. She didn't want to do anything the easy way. You know she is a PITA to deal with.
Her landlord is the one stealing the tools out of her shed.
if i want to put up cameras up for my protection the park management has no right to tell me to remove them
Supreme court says you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your house if you leave the blinds open. If you can see it from a public space, such as street or sidewalk, it's allowed to be recorded. Same for yards. Katz vs. United States
Yep. That's exactly what I was thinking. It's kind of a common sense rule when everyone has a camera nowadays. The thing the property owner is going to say it that he owns the property and he is somehow allowed to infringe a person's civil rights because it is "private property." Even though the civil rights are specifically supposed to protect a person from the government, it also applies to a-holes who think that because they own property, they somehow own the person leasing space on it.
A person has a right to protect their property and security. This sounds really fishy to me.
Totally. That's why she's allowed to shoot someone for trespassing. She's just not allowed to record the audio of her doing so. Gotta love the way the law works.
I’m so glad that the management for my trailer park doesn’t care about people putting security cameras. I have 8 cameras, 2 on each side and they’ve worked very great for me.
Place your cameras in your home at the windows and cover windows with ceramic window tint.
That is smart!!!!
That doesn't work well. I have a camera inside my front window. During the day it's great but not at night. You can't use the IR night vision because the IR reflection off the window blinds the camera.
@@EvrttGrnexactly what our issue was
@@momsterzz Put the IR outside the window.
@@momsterzz Put the IR outside the window.
I’d stick them inside facing out the windows. They obviously want to stalk and harass her. She should sue for discrimination as well.
She's vengeful and hateful and mean? She should sue the park owners for infringement on her right to privacy, retaliating against her after she recorded them on her property, and slander for calling her vengeful, hateful, and mean. I bet they're the ones that cut down the pride flag. That's more a hate crime than a theft.
That's clearly not a she moron
You are opening yourself to a lawsuit if you have different rules for different tenants.
Hopefully she charges them with violation of trespassing
"You can stand your ground you just can't video tape it."
Sounds like the park is in on the robberies, no other reason for not letting people have security cameras
I am astounded that this manager/owner of these properties would not have consulted a lawyer 1st before enacting policy. 2:59
Most people who live in trailer parks can't afford a lawyer, and the property owner knows this.
Really? You're astounded that some people are stupid? You must live a pretty sheltered life.
Or before defaming his tenant.
Seems targeted... But what do I know lol
The guy who made her take down the cameras that are protecting her in her home... says she's "retaliatory, vengeful and mean"...Ah Florida...
I always love it when people are so smart they don't even know to keep their mouth shut, I would imagine his last statements going to end up costing him a lot of money.
It's the Dunning-Kruger effect: the least bright people are the most confident in their assessment of their intellect while the really intelligent ones are the least confident and the most aware of what they don't know, therefore open to new information. There are more of the former than the latter in the US.
This woman should actually consider moving out of the state of Florida considering the laws recently passed against her and many others.
Johnny needs to put cameras in every one of her Windows facing out on her property. In an attempt to cover her entire property like she wants to. If they're inside her home that is her private property and she has the right to do so
Pretty sure they said her name was Joanie not "Johnny" lol. Don't think I've ever heard of a woman named Johnny.
I would hold the park liable then for any further damage to he property then. She has a right to protect her home. If they are going to keep her from that, then they need to be liable. I would get a lawyer and hire and a security firm.
Manager is doing something he has no business doing.
That's BS the landlord was probably stealing all your stuff
Anyone still in Florida, I will pray for you because you will need it.
That last statement from the owner just confirmed what she been saying. Revenge. Retalitory.
I would put 1 in my window inside my home !!!! She has a right to protect herself !!!
Since when do they have a right to touch her property without receiving a theft charge??
I would just install cameras that are hidden (some of them are nearly impossible to find, even with the camera detectors).
"Vengeful, hateful and mean," The next conversation with her lawyer should be about filling a defamation lawsuit against the landlord.
Solution: Hidden Cameras.
The mobile home park seems to have turned into the ATF making up rules as they go.
I honestly think the reason that owner was soooo against her having a camera, is because HE was the one vandalizing and stealing from her.
Too many unbelievable things happening in Florida
The wicked world we live in everybody should have a camera I feel safe if I see people with door Cam and window cam
Unreasonable desires to control others really shows one's quality of being.
She needs to sue to get it on record that the owners do not care about the safety of their residents.
What she? All I seen were dudes in this segment
Funny, she didn't sound hateful and mean...but what they did to her is.
I would have told him to call the police if it’s illegal.
Park owner: She's vengeful, hateful and mean. Whew! The projection! 📽😒
The park owner stating on camera the "she is vengeful, hateful and mean." could get himself in a heap of legal trouble.
I think she right. She was targeted because she caught the owners or employees on camera doing something wrong.
I didn't see any female wtf are you talking about?
Put your cameras inside your house!!
Criminals fear only the honest witness. The camera sees the truth.
Time to leave! There's a reason they don't want anyone to protect their house and be able to see what's going on around them!
Now you know, if you ever go to live on a mobile home park or similar place, ask them what their policy is for security cameras before you sign anything. If they say "you can't have cameras" or "you can't record audio" and cite some law, you can use your smartphone to fact-check the owner in real time and immediately know if he's lying before his mouth even stops moving.
There is no expectation of privacy in public.
She's vengeful, hateful, and mean, but you and your sister were caught sneaking around her house.
I think this is More personal than the camaras
"vengeful hateful and mean"
You have no idea ,
he left out Exhausted, Bullied, but my favorite : Nothing-to-lose .
I commend her restraint, honorary bull dagger, Sister in Pride.
Vengeful, hateful and mean? She has a lawsuit here. Hopefully she files.
Before i bought a house i lived in a mobile home park and i was robbed.i called the police and even though everyone was outside nobody saw anything.
I immediately put up high end cameras.
The landlord told me to take them down.
I told him that unless they installed cameras to catch the thiefs I'm keeping them up. 2weeks later my cameras caught a thief breaking into my truck and I used the video as evidence in court. And then 1 month later another person broke into my truck and the cops did nothing until the following day when they came back to inform me that a car shop was robbed the same night by the same person so back to court I went with more video evidence.
The funny thing is that when everyone realized that the cameras were real the partying throughout the night stopped near my place. And most of the neighbors agreed that they also should put up cameras. The landlord was getting calls from the annoying people about the cameras but the crime dropped to zero and the partying all night stopped and the dealers moved out.
(Deer cams can be jammed but hardwired cameras cant be jammed to my knowledge.)
I have cameras around my house now and any future place i get will have cameras installed.
You claim to have "read the law" about having a recording device yet you clearly lied but she 's the one who "cant be trusted" and you put a trail-cam in her back yard and a camera to watch people throwing away their garbage but shes the one who is "vengeful , hateful and mean "?
smdh
They make cameras so small now. There is a way around this.
She could mount the cameras inside the home pointing out the windows, audio would cease to be an issue since it could only record sounds from within her home.
Who else thinks Don just didn't want to be caught doing something in her yard?
Someone have something to hide
That's so they can go in at any time. They have been at it for years. Its everywhere! Yet, they blame the victims.
Install them behind you windows looking out.
That’s why they don’t want the cameras because the park is responsible for the theft..
they stole her stuff, pretty obvious.
They must be related to the owner of our trailer court. His favorite thing to do is get drunk and ride around on his quad, yelling at people for things he lets other people do.
For us, he keeps threatening to evict us because of the dog we got, that he approved of. I tried to get it in writing but he refused, now I know it's because it gives him something to throw a tantrum about.
He also yells at one of my neighbor's because she has a camper in her driveway, which so many other people have, but he also like to tell her it's bothering us, when we have already told her that we like it parked there because it stops the sun from shining straight into our living room.
Everyone here is sick and tired of him, except two old ladies who walk around all day, looking for things to go to him and tattle about, everyone is sick of them as well.
He's a real life Lahey, except when you start standing up for yourself, this one takes off on his quad because he doesn't want to hear it.
move
No, he's only one person out of so many here and we get along with the rest of them (except his two narcs).
I love it here because everyone treats everyone else like family.
Note: residents of mobile home parks should band together and buy the park and run as a co-op. Why shouldn't she have video security around her home?
"residents of mobile home parks should band together and buy the park and run as a co-op"
Perhaps you can post some details of how that would work; where would they get the millions of dollars to buy it; who would be the trustees and it would then be just like a HOA (homeowners association) and instead of a park owner that does not like you but takes your money, now it is your neighbor that does not like you.
Ha ha. They each pay out to rent most of their government handouts. This person is able to move due to her previous service thus getting larger check. Also if they owned stuff they would not qualify for assistance and be homeless soon...
That’s crazy, as long as her cameras are not peeping in on her neighbors private yard, but if the cameras are in public area, or just her yard…. What the problem..if it because of sound, disable the sound part…
She is better off just moving elsewhere I think. You can't reason with idiots like them. It sucks she is treated that way but she is better off just going somewhere else that won't be so unreasonable or hateful.
Seems like the trailer park owner is the crime boss here ,,,just so he doesn’t get coght
*caught*
I'm not taking the trailer park's side on this but - if there's such a problem, then she either needs to find another trailer park where she can have her cameras up and be away from the person who owns this trailer park or she will need to talk to a lawyer. I'm not a fan of anyone in the QT+ community as I do find most of them entitled and arrogant, but as someone in business law here from a legal standpoint, this is what I know; she can have cameras on her property. As long as it's attached to her house the owners of the trailer park can't stop her from recording. She can sue for that. Those saying that the owner slandered her however - defamation would be hard to prove even if it was recorded because his word against hers, he could explain that it was his opinion. Calling her hateful, vengeful and mean is an opinion. If he were to slander her by saying something that's not true like for example only; "she kicks puppies on Monday and Tuesdays." It's a poor example but, that's slander. Calling her hateful, vengeful would not constitute. Now, I do know that some trailer parks here do not allow you to hang up flags. That has been fought in court and has been ruled as unconstitutional. The owner of the park is shady. I would say that she isn't the problem but if I wa sher, I'd still move...especially since the owner seems extremely shady.
Floriduh.
They just don't like this woman.
I hope she finds a comfortable home away from those creeps.
Banning Security Cameras but, NOT guns....go figure.
Because banning guns makes all the guns go away. That’s why Chicago is so safe.
What a prick of a park owner! I feel for that poor woman. She served our country, and THIS is what she gets in return???!?
So everyone gets a gun just not a camera. Ron may be sneaking around and don't want no one knowing.
One does have to wonder what the park owners are trying to hide.
Have the local police been alerted to possible suspicious activity in the park?
Umm.....taking away someones ability to feel safe in their own home, especially in a state with a lot of crime is absolutely insane to me. This seems so sketch. Shes not trying to protect herself
this is really wrong and crazy.
Reminds me of when cops didn't want body cameras... And oddly enough the cops with the most complaints of abuse and assault were the ones who most loudly against it... Hmmm...
I would have just left them up and told him to f off.
Can't we protect our property and ourselves?
After watching your video my conclusion of the situation is that homeowner you were speaking to has been targeted by the trailer park owner the one you were speaking to in the car he is the one that put the slur on the trailer and stole her stuff he does not agree with her lifestyle and has been harassing her to get rid of her he even slandered her saying that she was hateful vindictive personally I would like to see everybody move out of that trailer park and no one ever move back in that's exactly what the owners deserve
THEY DON'T WANT CAMERAS BECAUSE THEY ARE IN ON IT!