I bought this lens few months ago after watching this video. I love wildlife photography, and it was great having it reviewed by a wildlife photographer. My favorite part is the scene where all the lenses were lined up next to the Panasonic 100-400mm, and it showed how compact it is compared to the rest.
I just saw you video. I must say you explained everything that one needs to know so they can make an informed decision about how well it works and what makes it work so well. Thank for this review.
Dan, it's hard to believe it's been 4 years since you shot this You Tube, infomation piece, on the Leica Lumix lens 100-400. The lens has been out on the market for so many years. Bravo!
Beautiful video Dan! Everyone's talking about moving to full frame for better image quality, but this video proves it wrong. Thanks for showing and sharing! Fab
Great video Dan...also great article on your Blog...I've checking the internet the whole day to read and see more about this lens! Really excited times for MFT shooters!
Absolutely stunning video. An A plus plus for the concise and extended information at the same time, the paradise looking scenery, the mind blowing shots, the good presence and pleasant voice of the photographer. SUBSCRIBED!!!
This is a really well made and presented video... too often, the reviewers of lenses and cameras on RUclips come across as rather dull and monotonal. This guy really knows how to present technical information in an easy and enthusiastic manner... I was actually looking for reviews on wide angle zooms... but I'm almost tempted to get this lens instead...
Hi Daniel, - thanks for the awesome video review on the 100-400mm lens - I was wondering if you might share (or make a video) on what settings you used to capture some of these images of birds in flight which are quite remarkable. - I know i'd be extremely grateful for help with that aspect of shooting birds, and I'm sure there are others here that would be equally as grateful. - Thanks again for a fantastic video!
Great video with stunning images Daniel. Thank you. I have placed an order for this lens based largely on your videos and blog, it looks that good! I am also getting a GX8 as that seems to me to be the best body for it. I keep coming back to re-read and rewatch.
I rented this lens based largely on this review and attached it to my Olympus OM-D E-M1 (original version). It's beautiful, but I wish it were just a little brighter. I wasn't able to get a ton of use out of it in the winter because I just didn't have enough light to work with outdoors for enough of the day between work and holiday commitments with family. On the plus side, it's remarkably compact when you consider the range.
Just got the new version of the lens mkii and really like it. Of course I'll alway want more reach, but not too bad for my needs for now. Any tips of the great clarity you were able to get in your images? yes, light is important with this lens. But any settings you found useful for tack sharp bird images? Thanks,
Beautiful images and video too. I've just recently got into the GH4 (mostly for video), so really encouraged to see what the Panasonic and the M43 system have to offer (in skilled hands of course!). Really inspiring, thanks.
+Volker A. Stark Volker, it is not huge by any means. It's a nice fit for the GX8 and even better with the GH4 with a battery grip. But overall it's much, much smaller than the Nikkor 80-400mm and the Canon 100-400mm. People I have shown the lens to and held it in their hands never once said, "wow, this is big". Most have always said, "wow' can't believe how small this thing is." I think you will find the same.
Thanks for this video, Daniel - it is very encouraging. I just traded in my brand new 100-300 ii lens for this lens, when I realized that I'm really going to enjoy my new hobby of bird & wildlife photography. The first thing I noticed is how stiff the zoom ring is - I won't be zooming in and out smoothly. But other than that I am very excited. My first few pics (on a G9, which didn't exist when this video was made) are nowhere near as nice as your shots, but I have a lot to learn and am looking forward to the journey.
mediamannaman glad to know you enjoyed the video. Good luck on your journey with the birds. Nothing more enjoyable than time in the outdoors with feathered friends. Thanks for visiting.
Hi Dan..thx! I think the initial results when it comes to IQ, built quality etc are promising. I just missed a series of shots of birds coming towards you, you know this is THE achillesheel of the 100-300..From theshots I saw you shooting in burst wqith AF-c (Ipresume) it did not sound like it was very fast...
+Serenoj69 Burst mode does just fine in AF-C. I have not had a chance to really test it with a really fast subject coming at the camera but it seems very capable. The AF is rocket fast, now we just need to test the DFD Predictive AF capabilities. Did some of that with the birds but not necessarily a lot.
+Daniel J. Cox Hi Daniel! Thx for your swift response. It must be so much fun for you. I remember when you got a first interview many months back (I think a year ago) with Panny and they promised something we would all love to see, but you could not disclose what it was. Cliffhanger! And now you are the first one inthe world to test that very lens...It is a dream of anyone interested in both photography and gear as well. I am surely going to sell the 100-300 which I do not respect much. 45-200 will be on its way out too, since 12-35..35-100 and 100-400 complement eachother perfectly fine. I guess with the Gh4 it will al work great and it has the advantage of a faster burstmode (in AF-c) and a larger buffer too over the GX8....But a series of 12-35, 35-100 and 100-400 plus body at what...just over 2Kg...It is exactly what I hoped for ever since I bought the G1 in dec. '08...Might add the 7-14 f2.8 Oly to top my travel kit off...Looking forward to your images and DFD test.
Definitely will rent this lens next time I go birding. Had rented the 100-300 with good results. Any tips using gimbals or monopods when taking bird pictures from afar?
Great video Daniel. Can't wait to get my hands on this new lens. I have been using the Panasonic 100-300mm lens on my G6 which is pretty good but this will be class! I like the built in hood, focus limiter and tripod mount, all very useful features. I suppose the trade-off is the variable aperture; the new Nikon 200-500mm is a constant f5.6 which looks great value and a tad cheaper than this lens, however it will be a beast to carry round! Keep up the good work. Love the light/colours in the video clips.
Any lens is a compromise. If someone wants 400mm and handy small size, he has to accept the small aperture. A tele converter makes not much sense here. With the GH4 in UHD = 2.5 crop it becomes a 250 - 1000mm. It can not replace my spectacular Leica R tele lenses (with TC up to f16/2240mm and amazing image quality!) but in many situations it might be a very convenient and sufficient choice! Considering the zoom range, image quality (I trust in Leica!) , build quality and the image stabilisation, I don't think, it is overpriced. I did expect higher price.
+bourbakis I have supplied a series of RAW files for anyone who wants them to download. You can find them on my blog at at these two places. naturalexposures.com/lumix-diaries-leica-100-400mm-samples/ naturalexposures.com/leica-lumix-100-400mm/
The photos look great but I see a lot of vignetting around 6:20 in the video. Is this normal with this lens or did you add that? Does it do that at all lengths or?
+Bobby Thompson It's also on the video immediately afterwards which could not have been shot with the 100-400. So maybe a combination of both video post as well as photo edit post work.
+Bobby Thompson Hi Boby. I'm the filmmaker who did the edit and I did add some vignetting on all the shots in post. It was a creative choice. I'll let Dan speak to the vignetting on the 100-400 as he is the pro photographer. All video and stills were either from a Gh4 or Gx8 though a variety of lenses were used for the interview and scenics. All shots where the Panasonic 100-400 were used are specifically titled as such.
Nice, but no one show in video the distance from a shot to 100mm and 400mm. I try to see in some reviews this zoom in frame , how much catch in video or photo in 100mm to 400mm... You don't think to put in your review?
Have you tried this lens on an Olympus OM-D EM1 or OM-D /eN10ii? I'm wondering about how the image stabilization works with Olympus's on sensor IS and if there are any focusing issues. I'm interested in the lens but I'm not about to buy a Panasonic body. I agree about the convenience of zooms; that's why I'm drawn to this new Leica-Pany lens rather than the Olympus f/4 300mm with the Oly 1.4x teleconverter.
+Bill Johnston, Jr. I haven't tried it on an Olympus body yet but plan to shortly. Will report on this on my Blog within the next month or so. I'm confident it's going to work beautifully on the Olympus.
Hi Bill, I've been shooting this lens on GX8 and E-M5 for fast moving subjects. AF and IS is very good to use with either body. Can happily shoot handheld at under 100th of a second at 400mm with my E-M5, probably lower though I haven't tried. Ruairi Johnston (another clan member)
Looks great, seems like it handles shake really well - I know with my Panasonic 100-300 when having it on the same tripod head you still get some odd vibrations, especially when trying to focus! you had to get a focus and not touch it at all to let it calm down, but still it wouldn't go away. Is this much better? or just part of having a light weight high zoom lens?
+Bowline Media Bowline, I've found it's necessary to shut down the lens Image Stabilization as Panasonic suggests in the manual while on tripod. I shot many images with IS on when on tripod and I was getting less than optimum results so I inquired with my Lumix friends and they reminded me all Lumix IS lenses are supposed to be shut off when on tripod. I've been doing the since and find it's helped in situations I was having issue with.
Great review. I'd really like to see this lens on an EM-1. I know the dual IS won't work across platforms (Oly/Pana) -- wondering if the stabilization in this lens will be enough to handhold at 400. Hmm.
I need to clarify about the cameras I use. I Did not shoot this video but a friend of my dad. He used the Lumix GH5. And did his own color grading. Just wanted to clarify that this video is not shot with a G9.
Ok, I have the lumix GH4 and I'm seeing the posivilidad to get the lens 100- 400 mm. But I'm not sure, seem to be is best to used with a tripod if I want to photograph birds... How stable is with the gh4?
I saw Mr. Cox has another video named Japan Winter Wildlife, you can see this body and lens draped in snow and it still works great. I think it sort of answers your question.
I rinse my Oly EM5 under a slow tap after exposing it to salt water on the beach, never had a problem. My GF1 has survived a lot of abuse and spills, so can't see it being a problem
How do you compare it with Fuji XT2 and 100-400, how about the different of their image quality, which one would you recommend for recording sports activities and birds?
Hey Daniel -- this is a great video. I've lost count of how many times I've watched it. If you're reading this, I'd like to ask you how this compares to the Panasonic 100-300mm II and the Olympus 75-300mm II (which is what I have). Obviously, this lens zooms farther, but are the optics really that much better than those less expensive lenses? I guess what I'm asking is if upgrading my Olympus 75-300mm II to this lens would really make such a big difference for me apart from the obvious extra reach and the weather sealing (which the Panasonic 100-300mm II also has).
+David Dornblaser David, unfortunately I don't know but I have to say I doubt it. Would be nice if Panasoinc and Olympus would take their cooperative efforts to this level but I'm guessing they won't.
Thanks. After I posted I realized that neither Panasonic nor Olympus have an incentive to accommodate the purchase of the others lenses. Thanks again for your review.
Hi. I have an Olympus E-M1 ii with this Panasonic Leica 100-400mm. As Mr. Cox had said, the dual IS won''t work here, you must have the same brand body and lens. Nonetheless, I found the Power O.I.S of this lens works great on its own even at the longest focal length. I like shooting wildlife and I don't like to use tripod, the combination of E-M1 ii and the 100-400mm works very well for me. Handheld shooting never has a problem. Focus speed is great too. I'm a long time Olympus user and I'm glad owning this Panasonic lens.
Leica 100-400 vs Leica 200mm f2.8 + teleconverters vs Leica 50-200mm with teleconverters vs Olympus 300mm f4 with teleconverters vs Olympus 40-150mm f2.8 with teleconverters. I use the Oly 40-150mm f2.8 with the MC-14 and MC-20 teleconverters, but I still wish I had something a little brighter or longer. I still battle the noise a lot.
I've been looking at the same setup as yourself (40-150 f2.8 w/ mc 1.4) or this Panasonic 100-400mm. Would you recommend the Olympus setup or vice versa? I like that I can use the 40-150 2.8 as a portrait and landscape lens but also have the ability to throw on the tele converter and make it a solid wildlife lens. But like you said, noise is a concern once converted.
Daniel J. Cox that's a little disappointing rumors were saying perhaps constant f4 to 300mm or f4.5 @ 300mm. For things like BIF where stabilization is sorta useless and you need to maintain high shutter speed that extra stop would of been very useful. The new olympus 300mm f4 at say dusk could be shooting at ISO 3200 which IMO is still god quality where the panasonic would need to be at ISO 6400...not awful if exposure is spot but not really ideal either. I wish Panasonic would of sacrificed some focal length for a wider aperture at 300mm, say 200-400mm. It's going to be tough to decide whether to get the olympus or the panasonic now.
+Jason Disbrow I agree Jason. I also would have loved to see a faster aperture but as usual photography is a constant exercise in compromises. I'm hopeful that if this lens does well it may encourage the next step. This really was a HUGE leap for Panasonic and we should applaud them for making this lens happen. Additionally, all we need is for them to pull an amazing sensor out of their hat for the GH5 or whatever it will be called and our need for the larger aperture is gone. I'm thrilled with this lens and can't wait for others to get their hands on it to show what it can do.
I posted this on Photo Joseph’s review of this lens. Would like you input as well! Been thinking about buying this lens until I look at the reviews. A common thread is the mount is easy to break. Metal screws are screwed into plastic, when they break the lens is trash as it can’t be fixed. I’m not sure if the people writing the reviews mishandled the lens or if in fact it’s a cheap way out for Panasonic to save a few cents in manufacturing. What’s your take on the lens? $1500 is a bit much for a throw away item.
Hi Rob, your concern about the fragility of the lens mount is not unfounded. I personally know of at least five or six people who have broken the mount as you describe. That being said, I've been shooting the same individual lens since the 100-400mm was first released, which is now almost exactly four years. In all that time I've never had the issue you describe. I just checked my Mylio image library and it shows that I've shot exactly 134,577 images with this lens. So the reality is it can be an issue, but not if you are at least reasonably careful. Keep in mind I travel to a lot of places that would be considered less than hospitable for camera equipment and I'm not easy on my gear. In fact, I tell my students all the time, "if your gear looks brand new, you're not having enough fun." That's not to say you want to see it break but I can honestly admit that the Lumix cameras and lenses I've been shooting since I switched from Nikon, are the most reliable and robust cameras I've ever used. I'm not just blowing smoke here. I honestly mean that and I believe it's due to several things which include many less moving parts, the fact all cameras today are better sealed and more weatherproof and Panasonic has a stellar reputation for durability across their entire product line. What it boils down to is electronics are more reliable as long as you keep the water out. And I've found that to very beneficial. I'm curious what Photo Joseph had to say? Finally, there does seem to be something unique to this lens that doesn't allow Panasonic to repair it here in the states. I've heard it's a very complicated lens to tear down and put back together. So the people I know who've had a lens mount issue have received a "Refurbished" one in exchange. This reduces the time extensively that they're not able to have the lens. When Lumix first started offering a refurbished lens they were charging what many people thought, including me, was an exorbitant price. They've reduced that dramatically and in some cases have replaced the lens for no charge. My recent experience with their Lumix Pro Services, lumix-pro.us which anyone can signup for, has been exceptional. I recently had a general clean and check along with the repair of outer rubber grips on three bodies and all were returned in less than two days. So in short, it's not a perfect lens mount but it's way less of a problem than the internet suggests.
Daniel J. Cox Thanks for the in depth response. Overall the lens has positive reviews with the exception of the mount and zooming the lens. From what I can see shooting while zooming is not very feasible with the tightness of the zoom. I’m happy with my Canon lenses on the camera with the exception of the weight of full frame lenses. Thanks Again.
Unfortunately, the 50-200 just doesn’t have the same reach. I guess it just depends on what you’re trying to do? If you’re seriously interested in bird photography or other wildlife subjects, you cannot beat the 100-400 lens.
@@danieljcox Well, I use the 70-200 2.8 on canon full frame and that lens can double for portrait and some wildlife photography. I don’t think the 100-400 will be useful in a portrait setting but I guess we can’t have it all. Thanks for your reply.
hi I'm using canon 7d mark ii and lens canon 100-400 mark 2 I would like to buy something light or panasonic GX8 lens and 100-400 is a good selection with a bird photography?
+Let's Go Outdoors I'm sooting it a great deal with the GH4. The GX8 does give it some additional IS capabilities with the Dual IS but most of the important IS is coming from the lens since in body IS is not as effective with really log lenses. That's one of the main reasons Olympus added in lens IS to their new 300mm F/4.
+Daniel J. Cox Because of the Micro 4/3 crop factor and the angle of view it's more like a 200-800mm/f8-12,6 equivalent lens on a full frame system. Even if the depth of field isn't fullframe, the sharpness still looks nice.
Ultimately its a 200-800 f4-6.3 but only using the central half of the view, so the light gathering is the same as any 1-400 f4-6.3, but DOF is like, well, a 100-400 f4-6.3.....which is what it is. If they could've shoe horned 2.8-4/5.6 into this it would've been amazing, but as it is, considering the DOF can be actually beneficial at this FL and also modern m43 bodies can go as high as ISO 6400 without too much trouble, I agree with mr Thorpe that this is a great lens for the system. a 200-800 FOV with a 200-800 f4-6.3 DOF (FF equiv) would've been massive, so pointless.
@@samrobertstheratcliff The light gathering is NOT the same as a full frame f/6.3, that is a very common misconception. The sensor is literally 1/4 the size, meaning it gathers a full two stops less light than any modern full frame sensor. This means that in terms of the final image quality is like shooting with an 800mm f/12.6.
TechnoBabble I should’ve worded my reply differently - as far as exposure goes, equivalence is irrelevant as far as stills go, the exposure will be the same, just the FOV changes. Obviously full frame will give better quality in a line for like situation, just like medium format will beat full frame, that’s just physics. But m4/3 will still get the shot, and with significantly less size and weight. And presuming you don’t want to print your shots on the side of Parliament, the final image should do the job. I get that bigger sensors gather more light, but I also believe in the right tool for the job - MF are fantastic for landscapes, m4/3 and APSC have real life advantages for long telephoto, FF hits the sweet spot for sports (particularly indoors), and isn’t far behind MF for landscapes, but FF and MF require huge lenses, so it’s not worth getting obsessed with sensor size - use the best tool for the job
+mookondo If you are serious, which I think you are since I'm also a big fan of this jacket, you can get at the National Geographic Store at shop.nationalgeographic.com/ngs/product/gifts/best-sellers/microfiber-travel-coat. It has a down liner that is very warm and lots of fabulous pockets. Absolutely my favorite coat.
+Daniel J. Cox. Albert A , Can you say whether your marvelous bird pictures are continuous videos shot at 30fps say or in short burst mode fast enough to still capture the movement. I ask this question with autofocus in mind?
I agree Brian. I'm anxiously awaiting the upcoming Olympus 150-400mm with a constant F/4.5. That said, the Leica 100-400mm is going to be very inexpensive compared to the new Olympus and considerably smaller and lighter. So there is always a trade-off. Photography is a constant game of compromise.
Thanks Dan. Very nice video. Well done. My dilemma, like I am sure so many others, has always been about camera/lens weight/size vs image quality. For long telephoto situations, and just using broad examples, and figuring 600mm equivalent as a minimum, this list goes all the way from a Panasonic FZ300, to a Sony RX10-III/IV, to a G85 with the 100-400, to a Nikon/Canon/Sony APS-C with, say, a Sigma 100-400C, to a Nikon/Canon full frame with a 150-600. It would be great to see side-by-side image quality comparisons of all these cameras, which would really reflect mostly I think, the differences in IQ of the sensors, given that the lenses are reasonably close. It's all a question of how much IQ a person is willing to give up to save X amount of weight. It's too bad the Pan/Leica 100-400 is so expensive (same as Fuji's 100-400). I wish Sigma would adapt their $800 100-400 to MFT and/or Fuji X-mount, as that would really open up the "affordability playing field" to more camera lines. I have a D600 and Sigma 150-600 (plus 1.4TC)...tried the Panasonic G7 and 100-300 and was not happy...with the dynamic range, hi-ISO performance, and the lens sharpness...and can't really afford the Pan/Leica 100-400...I now have a Sony RX10-III (can't afford the IV)...gonna try it next week at the CA coast with surf birds...focusing performance is probably going to be a limiting factor...and have also been considering an A6300/MC-11/100-400 as ways to eliminate some weight. For those who can afford it, the RX10-IV is about the same price as a Fuji or Panasonic 100-400, and brings good slo mo, and awesome auto-focus into the game as well: The other aspect of birding that's recently been coming into play is video with 120fps (or higher) slo mo @1080p...the A6300 does it (though it's not as good as several other cameras in that regard including the RX10-II/III/IV). I wonder how the GH5 would do with the 100-400...but of course that's $3700! Anyway, working in the slo mo aspect into all this just adds another layer of complexity.
The lens is still 100-400mm the angle of view is equivalent to 200-800mm magnification is the same people tend to get that wrong or mixed up you can not magically just get higher magnification. Source - www.four-thirds.org/en/special/lens_knowledge.html And no I'm, not a hater I use M43 for landscape and events. So much better doing a 10-15km hike through bushland with an M43 than an APS-C/FF camera. (also not a sensor snob love em all) Anyway, thank you for the great video.
Too expensive for me yet, but there is a point I want to second you, looking like a tourist is the most confortable situation in lots of places, no one is bothering you because of the size of your camera, and people are a lot more natural when talking and smiling :-)
+Tom Tom Very good observation! I've been saying this since the first days of starting to shoot MFT gear. When photographing people they are much less intimidated by smaller cameras, park rangers and other in positions of authority aren't nearly as difficult. I've noticed this a great deal over the past few years.
It is affordable, 12x more affordable than the canon equivalent, but is in no way cheap It uses higher quality glass and will produce better images in adequate light. Just see for yourself
@@Equossanos I'm afraid you really are expecting too much from this camera. You can't think this will get as sharp an image as a prime because of the amount of elements and groups to get the range. Added to the fact that there is no 35mm equivalent with this focal range and even if there was it wouldn't be as sharp either because you would need even more glass and it would more than likely not be leica glass and thus not as high quality. You are looking at maybe the Olympus 300mm Pro lens which is fantastic in it's regard but is very specialised and not ss versatile as this. In terms of build quality, imo its decent from the hard plastic construction, you can expect that or lower from pretty much every telephoto lens and if they were to make it from metal the weight would be a drawback honestly. And even if it is relatively expensive to what my wallet can handle lol, it isn't relatively expensive compared to full frame equivalents in focal range. The closest competitor is the Sigma 50-500 for apsc with approx the same focal range at the expense of weight, but aperature slight advantage. This is a quality lens and does perform exceptionally well, believe me.
@@inkoengbersen7252 And no zoom on that 800mm f/11, lens either. I own the Panasonic 100-400, have had it for a year and love it. Been using MFT since 2014, I am well aware of the "disadvantages" of MFT but I primarily do video, MFT is way better for video. Yes, this lens does zoom out to 800mm f/12.6 equivalent (f/12.6 equivalent aperture opening to full frame, and f/12.6 full frame equivalent depth of field etc). MFT is on the limit of what one actually needs, wants are a different thing. The full frame stuff is often overkill. Even in low light, most critters do pause for a bit or barely move, you can hand hold the 100-400 at 400 and get 1/50th sec exposure easily (but fire a burst to guarantee). Even with all the full frame options these days, I prefer MFT as I enjoy hiking and am happy to trade off some light gathering ability for the strengths of MFT like handholding this 800m equivalent focal length at low shutter speeds. MFT is fun, people forgot how to have fun and now most seem to expect "the best" in every way ... if it's not "the best" then it must be bad ... this lens is ideal for so many people, it's wonderful. Sure, the zoom ring is a little stiff, my only complaint, but I accepted that before I bought the lens :)
I bought his set up after watching this video. RUBISH!! I really believed all of this and went out to a nature reserve. It was a light but cloudy day. No wind. I took 483 photos of birds and none are any good. Some are in focus but the quality is crap. Even a robin about 3 foot from me was blurred. All setting are correct as recommended. Sending it all back.
Not that impressed actually. So much money for a lens wich doesnt look better then a 150-600 lens from either tamron or sigma. Both f6.3 at long end, but you can use the immense iso advantage of fullframe against mft.
+xDECORx Too bad I don't own a FF camera and don't ever intend to buy one. I'm not impressed with the 150-600mm because it won't fit on my MFT cameras. This lens looks like the ideal telephoto zoom for stills and video on my GH4 and OMD EM5 II.
I bought this lens few months ago after watching this video. I love wildlife photography, and it was great having it reviewed by a wildlife photographer. My favorite part is the scene where all the lenses were lined up next to the Panasonic 100-400mm, and it showed how compact it is compared to the rest.
When Photographed, glad you enjoyed the video.
Great, no-nonsense, relaxed and informative review. Thank you.
Looks like a very great lens. Good optic quality and not too heavy and bulky
I just saw you video. I must say you explained everything that one needs to know so they can make an informed decision about how well it works and what makes it work so well. Thank for this review.
Dan, it's hard to believe it's been 4 years since you shot this You Tube, infomation piece, on the Leica Lumix lens 100-400. The lens has been out on the market for so many years. Bravo!
Beautiful video Dan! Everyone's talking about moving to full frame for better image quality, but this video proves it wrong. Thanks for showing and sharing! Fab
i'm in love with the amazing videography!
SamIsOnline I totally agree with you
Thank you so much. Very grateful for your kind comments.
Great video Dan...also great article on your Blog...I've checking the internet the whole day to read and see more about this lens! Really excited times for MFT shooters!
Absolutely stunning video. An A plus plus for the concise and extended information at the same time, the paradise looking scenery, the mind blowing shots, the good presence and pleasant voice of the photographer. SUBSCRIBED!!!
This is a really well made and presented video... too often, the reviewers of lenses and cameras on RUclips come across as rather dull and monotonal. This guy really knows how to present technical information in an easy and enthusiastic manner... I was actually looking for reviews on wide angle zooms... but I'm almost tempted to get this lens instead...
What a great review. Lots of very useful information as well as examples. May be the one lens that brings me back into the m43rds system.
Hi Daniel, - thanks for the awesome video review on the 100-400mm lens - I was wondering if you might share (or make a video) on what settings you used to capture some of these images of birds in flight which are quite remarkable. - I know i'd be extremely grateful for help with that aspect of shooting birds, and I'm sure there are others here that would be equally as grateful. - Thanks again for a fantastic video!
Wow 800mm equivalent of reach would be a lot of help with them birds. Great job on the video and review. Liked and subscribed.
Great video with stunning images Daniel. Thank you. I have placed an order for this lens based largely on your videos and blog, it looks that good! I am also getting a GX8 as that seems to me to be the best body for it. I keep coming back to re-read and rewatch.
I rented this lens based largely on this review and attached it to my Olympus OM-D E-M1 (original version).
It's beautiful, but I wish it were just a little brighter. I wasn't able to get a ton of use out of it in the winter because I just didn't have enough light to work with outdoors for enough of the day between work and holiday commitments with family. On the plus side, it's remarkably compact when you consider the range.
You could throw this in a backpack and hike all day. That is so cool.
What a beautiful review.
Just got the new version of the lens mkii and really like it. Of course I'll alway want more reach, but not too bad for my needs for now. Any tips of the great clarity you were able to get in your images? yes, light is important with this lens. But any settings you found useful for tack sharp bird images? Thanks,
Amazing love your vdo and photo
Lovely video and pictures! It's an amazing lens and probably a quarter size of similar DSLR lenses. I hope one day to add this to my arsenal.
Beautiful images and video too.
I've just recently got into the GH4 (mostly for video), so really encouraged to see what the Panasonic and the M43 system have to offer (in skilled hands of course!). Really inspiring, thanks.
Great video demonstration. I really need to get this lens for my videos.
I have the GX8 and I will see, how crazy it will look like with this huge lens!
+Volker A. Stark Volker, it is not huge by any means. It's a nice fit for the GX8 and even better with the GH4 with a battery grip. But overall it's much, much smaller than the Nikkor 80-400mm and the Canon 100-400mm. People I have shown the lens to and held it in their hands never once said, "wow, this is big". Most have always said, "wow' can't believe how small this thing is." I think you will find the same.
great vid! i too am very impressed with the compact system that Panasonic is now offering and now with this optic, hold on Nikon your in for a fight
Beautiful footage! Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for this video, Daniel - it is very encouraging. I just traded in my brand new 100-300 ii lens for this lens, when I realized that I'm really going to enjoy my new hobby of bird & wildlife photography. The first thing I noticed is how stiff the zoom ring is - I won't be zooming in and out smoothly. But other than that I am very excited. My first few pics (on a G9, which didn't exist when this video was made) are nowhere near as nice as your shots, but I have a lot to learn and am looking forward to the journey.
mediamannaman glad to know you enjoyed the video. Good luck on your journey with the birds. Nothing more enjoyable than time in the outdoors with feathered friends. Thanks for visiting.
@6:40 Well, thats a nice shot!
So nice video sir I also love photo graphy and video graphy
LFC do you have version 1 or version 2? Version 2 is actually quite good.
Really nice and useful review. Thanx!
Hi Dan..thx! I think the initial results when it comes to IQ, built quality etc are promising. I just missed a series of shots of birds coming towards you, you know this is THE achillesheel of the 100-300..From theshots I saw you shooting in burst wqith AF-c (Ipresume) it did not sound like it was very fast...
+Serenoj69 Burst mode does just fine in AF-C. I have not had a chance to really test it with a really fast subject coming at the camera but it seems very capable. The AF is rocket fast, now we just need to test the DFD Predictive AF capabilities. Did some of that with the birds but not necessarily a lot.
+Daniel J. Cox Hi Daniel! Thx for your swift response. It must be so much fun for you. I remember when you got a first interview many months back (I think a year ago) with Panny and they promised something we would all love to see, but you could not disclose what it was. Cliffhanger!
And now you are the first one inthe world to test that very lens...It is a dream of anyone interested in both photography and gear as well. I am surely going to sell the 100-300 which I do not respect much. 45-200 will be on its way out too, since 12-35..35-100 and 100-400 complement eachother perfectly fine. I guess with the Gh4 it will al work great and it has the advantage of a faster burstmode (in AF-c) and a larger buffer too over the GX8....But a series of 12-35, 35-100 and 100-400 plus body at what...just over 2Kg...It is exactly what I hoped for ever since I bought the G1 in dec. '08...Might add the 7-14 f2.8 Oly to top my travel kit off...Looking forward to your images and DFD test.
Good video. I want that lens.
Definitely will rent this lens next time I go birding. Had rented the 100-300 with good results. Any tips using gimbals or monopods when taking bird pictures from afar?
Great video that lens pretty awesome.
Great video Daniel. Can't wait to get my hands on this new lens. I have been using the Panasonic 100-300mm lens on my G6 which is pretty good but this will be class! I like the built in hood, focus limiter and tripod mount, all very useful features. I suppose the trade-off is the variable aperture; the new Nikon 200-500mm is a constant f5.6 which looks great value and a tad cheaper than this lens, however it will be a beast to carry round! Keep up the good work. Love the light/colours in the video clips.
I love you and your way of explaining I can listen you whole day. And your images wow I wanna become student
Thanks Rajendra.
Any lens is a compromise. If someone wants 400mm and handy small size, he has to accept the small aperture. A tele converter makes not much sense here. With the GH4 in UHD = 2.5 crop it becomes a 250 - 1000mm. It can not replace my spectacular Leica R tele lenses (with TC up to f16/2240mm and amazing image quality!) but in many situations it might be a very convenient and sufficient choice! Considering the zoom range, image quality (I trust in Leica!) , build quality and the image stabilisation, I don't think, it is overpriced. I did expect higher price.
This is awesome. Would like to see RAW files of the pictures.
Well done!
+bourbakis I have supplied a series of RAW files for anyone who wants them to download. You can find them on my blog at at these two places.
naturalexposures.com/lumix-diaries-leica-100-400mm-samples/
naturalexposures.com/leica-lumix-100-400mm/
The photos look great but I see a lot of vignetting around 6:20 in the video. Is this normal with this lens or did you add that? Does it do that at all lengths or?
+Bobby Thompson It's also on the video immediately afterwards which could not have been shot with the 100-400. So maybe a combination of both video post as well as photo edit post work.
+Bobby Thompson Hi Boby. I'm the filmmaker who did the edit and I did add some vignetting on all the shots in post. It was a creative choice. I'll let Dan speak to the vignetting on the 100-400 as he is the pro photographer. All video and stills were either from a Gh4 or Gx8 though a variety of lenses were used for the interview and scenics. All shots where the Panasonic 100-400 were used are specifically titled as such.
The Weekly Fly Nice work!
beautifully shot video! safe to assume a GH4 or two were used?!
+edshotsdotcodotuk Hi Ed, all shots in the video either used a GH4 or a GX8.
Nice, but no one show in video the distance from a shot to 100mm and 400mm. I try to see in some reviews this zoom in frame , how much catch in video or photo in 100mm to 400mm... You don't think to put in your review?
Great review time to save up for this beast.
WOW! Beautiful footage. What camera are you shooting yourself with in this video?
Very good. Have you tried the lens with a GX9?
Unfortunately, no David. Haven't had a GX9
Have you tried this lens on an Olympus OM-D EM1 or OM-D /eN10ii? I'm wondering about how the image stabilization works with Olympus's on sensor IS and if there are any focusing issues. I'm interested in the lens but I'm not about to buy a
Panasonic body. I agree about the convenience of zooms; that's why I'm drawn to this new Leica-Pany lens rather than the Olympus f/4 300mm with the Oly 1.4x teleconverter.
+Bill Johnston, Jr. I haven't tried it on an Olympus body yet but plan to shortly. Will report on this on my Blog within the next month or so. I'm confident it's going to work beautifully on the Olympus.
Hi Bill, I've been shooting this lens on GX8 and E-M5 for fast moving subjects. AF and IS is very good to use with either body. Can happily shoot handheld at under 100th of a second at 400mm with my E-M5, probably lower though I haven't tried. Ruairi Johnston (another clan member)
Amazing lens! I just bought my G85, and i'm hoping to buy this lens sometime as I get comfortable in photography.
Did you get the 100-400?
Looks great, seems like it handles shake really well - I know with my Panasonic 100-300 when having it on the same tripod head you still get some odd vibrations, especially when trying to focus! you had to get a focus and not touch it at all to let it calm down, but still it wouldn't go away. Is this much better? or just part of having a light weight high zoom lens?
+Bowline Media Bowline, I've found it's necessary to shut down the lens Image Stabilization as Panasonic suggests in the manual while on tripod. I shot many images with IS on when on tripod and I was getting less than optimum results so I inquired with my Lumix friends and they reminded me all Lumix IS lenses are supposed to be shut off when on tripod. I've been doing the since and find it's helped in situations I was having issue with.
The small size of the lens is pretty impressive, given the range you have.
Great review. I'd really like to see this lens on an EM-1. I know the dual IS won't work across platforms (Oly/Pana) -- wondering if the stabilization in this lens will be enough to handhold at 400. Hmm.
+Dustinrhoades So far from my limited use the in lens IS works very well with the Olympus OM-D EM-1.
wow thanks and might i ask what Camera are you using to film yourself and the b-roll
I use mainly the G9 for all my video work. Sometimes the GH5.
@@danieljcox i have have a G9 and i absolutely love your color grading
I need to clarify about the cameras I use. I Did not shoot this video but a friend of my dad. He used the Lumix GH5. And did his own color grading. Just wanted to clarify that this video is not shot with a G9.
@@danieljcox its stellar, thank you for the reply
Ok, I have the lumix GH4 and I'm seeing the posivilidad to get the lens 100- 400 mm. But I'm not sure, seem to be is best to used with a tripod if I want to photograph birds... How stable is with the gh4?
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 body and the Panasonic 100-400 mm are both splash proof.
Does that mean that you can rinse them under the tap?
I saw Mr. Cox has another video named Japan Winter Wildlife, you can see this body and lens draped in snow and it still works great. I think it sort of answers your question.
I rinse my Oly EM5 under a slow tap after exposing it to salt water on the beach, never had a problem. My GF1 has survived a lot of abuse and spills, so can't see it being a problem
How do you compare it with Fuji XT2 and 100-400, how about the different of their image quality, which one would you recommend for recording sports activities and birds?
Hey Daniel -- this is a great video. I've lost count of how many times I've watched it.
If you're reading this, I'd like to ask you how this compares to the Panasonic 100-300mm II and the Olympus 75-300mm II (which is what I have). Obviously, this lens zooms farther, but are the optics really that much better than those less expensive lenses? I guess what I'm asking is if upgrading my Olympus 75-300mm II to this lens would really make such a big difference for me apart from the obvious extra reach and the weather sealing (which the Panasonic 100-300mm II also has).
Hi I'm thinking about getting the 100-300 ii. What's your thought on it? Iq etc?
Hi Dan. Do you know if the Dual IS works with the Olympus OMD's, specifically the E-M5 ii or E-M1. Thanks.
+David Dornblaser David, unfortunately I don't know but I have to say I doubt it. Would be nice if Panasoinc and Olympus would take their cooperative efforts to this level but I'm guessing they won't.
Thanks. After I posted I realized that neither Panasonic nor Olympus have an incentive to accommodate the purchase of the others lenses. Thanks again for your review.
+Daniel J. Cox Usted cree que se pueda usar para foto deportiva?? (soccer)
Hi. I have an Olympus E-M1 ii with this Panasonic Leica 100-400mm. As Mr. Cox had said, the dual IS won''t work here, you must have the same brand body and lens. Nonetheless, I found the Power O.I.S of this lens works great on its own even at the longest focal length. I like shooting wildlife and I don't like to use tripod, the combination of E-M1 ii and the 100-400mm works very well for me. Handheld shooting never has a problem. Focus speed is great too. I'm a long time Olympus user and I'm glad owning this Panasonic lens.
You touched on stabilization, I was wondering if you had to turn off stabilization when photographing birds in flight or put it into panning mode?
+GlennQ Definitely not turning of IS with birds in flight. It is necessary to turn IS off if on tripod.
Is this a manual zoom only or is it capable of being power zoomed using the controls on the camera body? Thank you.
Flight Frames manual zoom only.
Leica 100-400 vs Leica 200mm f2.8 + teleconverters vs Leica 50-200mm with teleconverters vs Olympus 300mm f4 with teleconverters vs Olympus 40-150mm f2.8 with teleconverters.
I use the Oly 40-150mm f2.8 with the MC-14 and MC-20 teleconverters, but I still wish I had something a little brighter or longer. I still battle the noise a lot.
I've been looking at the same setup as yourself (40-150 f2.8 w/ mc 1.4) or this Panasonic 100-400mm. Would you recommend the Olympus setup or vice versa? I like that I can use the 40-150 2.8 as a portrait and landscape lens but also have the ability to throw on the tele converter and make it a solid wildlife lens. But like you said, noise is a concern once converted.
Great video Dan. Can you tell me whats the max aperture at 300mm?
+Jason Disbrow Maximum aperture at 300mm is F/5.6
Daniel J. Cox that's a little disappointing rumors were saying perhaps constant f4 to 300mm or f4.5 @ 300mm. For things like BIF where stabilization is sorta useless and you need to maintain high shutter speed that extra stop would of been very useful. The new olympus 300mm f4 at say dusk could be shooting at ISO 3200 which IMO is still god quality where the panasonic would need to be at ISO 6400...not awful if exposure is spot but not really ideal either. I wish Panasonic would of sacrificed some focal length for a wider aperture at 300mm, say 200-400mm. It's going to be tough to decide whether to get the olympus or the panasonic now.
+Jason Disbrow I agree Jason. I also would have loved to see a faster aperture but as usual photography is a constant exercise in compromises. I'm hopeful that if this lens does well it may encourage the next step. This really was a HUGE leap for Panasonic and we should applaud them for making this lens happen. Additionally, all we need is for them to pull an amazing sensor out of their hat for the GH5 or whatever it will be called and our need for the larger aperture is gone. I'm thrilled with this lens and can't wait for others to get their hands on it to show what it can do.
Would all these details be the same on a Lumix GH5 please.
Daniel, can it do dual IS with the Olympus OM 1 D Mark?
I posted this on Photo Joseph’s review of this lens. Would like you input as well!
Been thinking about buying this lens until I look at the reviews. A common thread is the mount is easy to break. Metal screws are screwed into plastic, when they break the lens is trash as it can’t be fixed. I’m not sure if the people writing the reviews mishandled the lens or if in fact it’s a cheap way out for Panasonic to save a few cents in manufacturing. What’s your take on the lens? $1500 is a bit much for a throw away item.
Hi Rob, your concern about the fragility of the lens mount is not unfounded. I personally know of at least five or six people who have broken the mount as you describe. That being said, I've been shooting the same individual lens since the 100-400mm was first released, which is now almost exactly four years. In all that time I've never had the issue you describe. I just checked my Mylio image library and it shows that I've shot exactly 134,577 images with this lens. So the reality is it can be an issue, but not if you are at least reasonably careful. Keep in mind I travel to a lot of places that would be considered less than hospitable for camera equipment and I'm not easy on my gear. In fact, I tell my students all the time, "if your gear looks brand new, you're not having enough fun." That's not to say you want to see it break but I can honestly admit that the Lumix cameras and lenses I've been shooting since I switched from Nikon, are the most reliable and robust cameras I've ever used. I'm not just blowing smoke here. I honestly mean that and I believe it's due to several things which include many less moving parts, the fact all cameras today are better sealed and more weatherproof and Panasonic has a stellar reputation for durability across their entire product line. What it boils down to is electronics are more reliable as long as you keep the water out. And I've found that to very beneficial. I'm curious what Photo Joseph had to say?
Finally, there does seem to be something unique to this lens that doesn't allow Panasonic to repair it here in the states. I've heard it's a very complicated lens to tear down and put back together. So the people I know who've had a lens mount issue have received a "Refurbished" one in exchange. This reduces the time extensively that they're not able to have the lens. When Lumix first started offering a refurbished lens they were charging what many people thought, including me, was an exorbitant price. They've reduced that dramatically and in some cases have replaced the lens for no charge. My recent experience with their Lumix Pro Services, lumix-pro.us which anyone can signup for, has been exceptional. I recently had a general clean and check along with the repair of outer rubber grips on three bodies and all were returned in less than two days.
So in short, it's not a perfect lens mount but it's way less of a problem than the internet suggests.
Daniel J. Cox Thanks for the in depth response. Overall the lens has positive reviews with the exception of the mount and zooming the lens. From what I can see shooting while zooming is not very feasible with the tightness of the zoom. I’m happy with my Canon lenses on the camera with the exception of the weight of full frame lenses. Thanks Again.
I am torn between the 100 to 400 and the 50-200 2.8. Could you have done almost the same job with the 50-200?
Unfortunately, the 50-200 just doesn’t have the same reach. I guess it just depends on what you’re trying to do? If you’re seriously interested in bird photography or other wildlife subjects, you cannot beat the 100-400 lens.
@@danieljcox Well, I use the 70-200 2.8 on canon full frame and that lens can double for portrait and some wildlife photography. I don’t think the 100-400 will be useful in a portrait setting but I guess we can’t have it all. Thanks for your reply.
hi I'm using canon 7d mark ii and lens canon 100-400 mark 2 I would like to buy something light or panasonic GX8 lens and 100-400 is a good selection with a bird photography?
Thx
I know Panasonic cameras will correct for any distortion, will distortion be corrected when using Olympus cameras?
That's a good question. I'll do some checking and get back to you.
Nice product
I shoot with the GH4 would you say this new lens would be a good match for that body ... or do you recommend the GX8?
+Let's Go Outdoors I'm sooting it a great deal with the GH4. The GX8 does give it some additional IS capabilities with the Dual IS but most of the important IS is coming from the lens since in body IS is not as effective with really log lenses. That's one of the main reasons Olympus added in lens IS to their new 300mm F/4.
Thanks. Just picked up the lens. Video is looking real nice!
When will it be available?
+far0ashgar I've heard the release date will be March 27th. I believe.
Very good!
+Daniel J. Cox Because of the Micro 4/3 crop factor and the angle of view it's more like a 200-800mm/f8-12,6 equivalent lens on a full frame system. Even if the depth of field isn't fullframe, the sharpness still looks nice.
Ultimately its a 200-800 f4-6.3 but only using the central half of the view, so the light gathering is the same as any 1-400 f4-6.3, but DOF is like, well, a 100-400 f4-6.3.....which is what it is. If they could've shoe horned 2.8-4/5.6 into this it would've been amazing, but as it is, considering the DOF can be actually beneficial at this FL and also modern m43 bodies can go as high as ISO 6400 without too much trouble, I agree with mr Thorpe that this is a great lens for the system. a 200-800 FOV with a 200-800 f4-6.3 DOF (FF equiv) would've been massive, so pointless.
@@samrobertstheratcliff The light gathering is NOT the same as a full frame f/6.3, that is a very common misconception. The sensor is literally 1/4 the size, meaning it gathers a full two stops less light than any modern full frame sensor. This means that in terms of the final image quality is like shooting with an 800mm f/12.6.
TechnoBabble I should’ve worded my reply differently - as far as exposure goes, equivalence is irrelevant as far as stills go, the exposure will be the same, just the FOV changes. Obviously full frame will give better quality in a line for like situation, just like medium format will beat full frame, that’s just physics. But m4/3 will still get the shot, and with significantly less size and weight. And presuming you don’t want to print your shots on the side of Parliament, the final image should do the job. I get that bigger sensors gather more light, but I also believe in the right tool for the job - MF are fantastic for landscapes, m4/3 and APSC have real life advantages for long telephoto, FF hits the sweet spot for sports (particularly indoors), and isn’t far behind MF for landscapes, but FF and MF require huge lenses, so it’s not worth getting obsessed with sensor size - use the best tool for the job
What camera is used to film this?
+Tom Schulte Lumix GH4
NIce jackett. Where can I get one?
+mookondo If you are serious, which I think you are since I'm also a big fan of this jacket, you can get at the National Geographic Store at shop.nationalgeographic.com/ngs/product/gifts/best-sellers/microfiber-travel-coat. It has a down liner that is very warm and lots of fabulous pockets. Absolutely my favorite coat.
+Daniel J. Cox. Albert A , Can you say whether your marvelous bird pictures are continuous videos shot at 30fps say or in short burst mode fast enough to still capture the movement. I ask this question with autofocus in mind?
This would be great for a private investigator.
Personally I wish they made this lens bigger at the end to keep the aperture constant.
I agree Brian. I'm anxiously awaiting the upcoming Olympus 150-400mm with a constant F/4.5. That said, the Leica 100-400mm is going to be very inexpensive compared to the new Olympus and considerably smaller and lighter. So there is always a trade-off. Photography is a constant game of compromise.
Thanks Dan. Very nice video. Well done. My dilemma, like I am sure so many others, has always been about camera/lens weight/size vs image quality. For long telephoto situations, and just using broad examples, and figuring 600mm equivalent as a minimum, this list goes all the way from a Panasonic FZ300, to a Sony RX10-III/IV, to a G85 with the 100-400, to a Nikon/Canon/Sony APS-C with, say, a Sigma 100-400C, to a Nikon/Canon full frame with a 150-600.
It would be great to see side-by-side image quality comparisons of all these cameras, which would really reflect mostly I think, the differences in IQ of the sensors, given that the lenses are reasonably close. It's all a question of how much IQ a person is willing to give up to save X amount of weight. It's too bad the Pan/Leica 100-400 is so expensive (same as Fuji's 100-400). I wish Sigma would adapt their $800 100-400 to MFT and/or Fuji X-mount, as that would really open up the "affordability playing field" to more camera lines.
I have a D600 and Sigma 150-600 (plus 1.4TC)...tried the Panasonic G7 and 100-300 and was not happy...with the dynamic range, hi-ISO performance, and the lens sharpness...and can't really afford the Pan/Leica 100-400...I now have a Sony RX10-III (can't afford the IV)...gonna try it next week at the CA coast with surf birds...focusing performance is probably going to be a limiting factor...and have also been considering an A6300/MC-11/100-400 as ways to eliminate some weight.
For those who can afford it, the RX10-IV is about the same price as a Fuji or Panasonic 100-400, and brings good slo mo, and awesome auto-focus into the game as well:
The other aspect of birding that's recently been coming into play is video with 120fps (or higher) slo mo @1080p...the A6300 does it (though it's not as good as several other cameras in that regard including the RX10-II/III/IV). I wonder how the GH5 would do with the 100-400...but of course that's $3700! Anyway, working in the slo mo aspect into all this just adds another layer of complexity.
What's the max zoom capability x26?
Not sure what you mean. X26 of what?
The lens is still 100-400mm the angle of view is equivalent to 200-800mm magnification is the same people tend to get that wrong or mixed up you can not magically just get higher magnification.
Source - www.four-thirds.org/en/special/lens_knowledge.html
And no I'm, not a hater I use M43 for landscape and events. So much better doing a 10-15km hike through bushland with an M43 than an APS-C/FF camera. (also not a sensor snob love em all)
Anyway, thank you for the great video.
Too expensive for me yet, but there is a point I want to second you, looking like a tourist is the most confortable situation in lots of places, no one is bothering you because of the size of your camera, and people are a lot more natural when talking and smiling :-)
+Tom Tom Very good observation! I've been saying this since the first days of starting to shoot MFT gear. When photographing people they are much less intimidated by smaller cameras, park rangers and other in positions of authority aren't nearly as difficult. I've noticed this a great deal over the past few years.
Curious why you think park rangers and others in position of authority are intimidated by large camera gear?
This will certainly give the new Olympus 300mm f/4 a run for its money.
My 42.5 is almost to shatp
am i the only one noticing that the skin tones in this video are messed up? he has yellow skin
It's not leica glass, it's Panasonic glass, designed by leica. Did you know that some Panasonic and many Olympus lenses were designed by Sigma?
sadly I'd have to make do with the 100-300 lumix given the price of the 100-400 Leica
LFC markeb sorry to hear that LFC. Don’t give up longterm. There will be many coming on the used market once Olympus releases their new 150-400mm.
LFC markeb hang in there buddy
@@danieljcox the 100-300 isn't that bad in reality especially the mk2 with power OIS
800mm f12.6 sounds like a very cheap lens packed in a very expensive system :P
It is affordable, 12x more affordable than the canon equivalent, but is in no way cheap It uses higher quality glass and will produce better images in adequate light. Just see for yourself
@@andrewally3570 I have and it's really low quality for that money sorry but I'm not impressed at all with this lens or setup.
@@Equossanos I'm afraid you really are expecting too much from this camera. You can't think this will get as sharp an image as a prime because of the amount of elements and groups to get the range. Added to the fact that there is no 35mm equivalent with this focal range and even if there was it wouldn't be as sharp either because you would need even more glass and it would more than likely not be leica glass and thus not as high quality. You are looking at maybe the Olympus 300mm Pro lens which is fantastic in it's regard but is very specialised and not ss versatile as this. In terms of build quality, imo its decent from the hard plastic construction, you can expect that or lower from pretty much every telephoto lens and if they were to make it from metal the weight would be a drawback honestly. And even if it is relatively expensive to what my wallet can handle lol, it isn't relatively expensive compared to full frame equivalents in focal range. The closest competitor is the Sigma 50-500 for apsc with approx the same focal range at the expense of weight, but aperature slight advantage. This is a quality lens and does perform exceptionally well, believe me.
@@inkoengbersen7252 And no zoom on that 800mm f/11, lens either. I own the Panasonic 100-400, have had it for a year and love it. Been using MFT since 2014, I am well aware of the "disadvantages" of MFT but I primarily do video, MFT is way better for video. Yes, this lens does zoom out to 800mm f/12.6 equivalent (f/12.6 equivalent aperture opening to full frame, and f/12.6 full frame equivalent depth of field etc). MFT is on the limit of what one actually needs, wants are a different thing. The full frame stuff is often overkill. Even in low light, most critters do pause for a bit or barely move, you can hand hold the 100-400 at 400 and get 1/50th sec exposure easily (but fire a burst to guarantee). Even with all the full frame options these days, I prefer MFT as I enjoy hiking and am happy to trade off some light gathering ability for the strengths of MFT like handholding this 800m equivalent focal length at low shutter speeds. MFT is fun, people forgot how to have fun and now most seem to expect "the best" in every way ... if it's not "the best" then it must be bad ... this lens is ideal for so many people, it's wonderful. Sure, the zoom ring is a little stiff, my only complaint, but I accepted that before I bought the lens :)
More like Panasonic technology than Leica.
I bought his set up after watching this video. RUBISH!! I really believed all of this and went out to a nature reserve. It was a light but cloudy day. No wind. I took 483 photos of birds and none are any good. Some are in focus but the quality is crap. Even a robin about 3 foot from me was blurred. All setting are correct as recommended. Sending it all back.
Grahamm5790 you are the problem... or a FF Troll...
O
Not that impressed actually. So much money for a lens wich doesnt look better then a 150-600 lens from either tamron or sigma. Both f6.3 at long end, but you can use the immense iso advantage of fullframe against mft.
+xDECORx
Wow, and you can actually tell all this from a RUclips 1080 video? Impressive!
+Jean V thanks jean. take a close look at the sample pics and you will be enlightened.
+Jean V thanks jean. take a close look at the sample pics and you will be enlightened.
+xDECORx Too bad I don't own a FF camera and don't ever intend to buy one. I'm not impressed with the 150-600mm because it won't fit on my MFT cameras. This lens looks like the ideal telephoto zoom for stills and video on my GH4 and OMD EM5 II.
+xDECORx you totally missed the point of the physical size and weight.