The algorithm finally decided to show me this channel after 15 random cat, anime fights and one guy failing to make a simple spin on a skate video, the universe is restored
@@IntoEurope hey i dont know if you have made one (at least i cant find it in your channel ) can you do one for the migrant push by the turks in greece that happened some months ago and the entire crisis among these 2 nations? Sidenote :great job btw
@@billvilmezis5968 Naah - we have heard so much about refugees. This is looking at all what is wrong in the world. It is much better to look at all what is right in the world. Or what could be right. Eg a internal marked for the EU from Lisabon to Vladivostok. Was that something?? :)
@RoastWorthy Technically they didn't really win any elections though, they did get a fairly high vote count but it was far short of a complete win. But they also had a few hundred thousand strong militia and the Germany political system was breaking down and some kind of autocracy was probably going to happen. It being a bit of a question if the Nazi, the conservative nationalist or communists would win. Well the conservatives thought they could use the Nazi against the communists, but in the end they were wrong and Nazi managed a coup d'etat taking all power for themselves. Though in some more modern cases the autocratic government basically did win a election and just pulled more and more power to themselves over time. So it's still a very real threat to a democracy. It's just not the way the Nazi took power, where the lesson in part is, don't let major political parties have their own private militia/army.
@RoastWorthy Of course the Nazi are to blame, they did a coup d'etat. That's a super hostile action that's completely deliberate on their side. The conservatives were just trying to do their best with a really bad hand as if they didn't compromise with one of both sides it probably would be a civil war. This due to Germany being limited to a 100k army that would not easily be able to put down several 100k militia. In hindsight the conservatives seem to have decided that maybe they should have chosen the civil war rather then think they could some how keep some kind of moderating control on one of the two radical factions. In any case, my main point was more the Nazi didn't gain power by winning an election, they did a hostile take over by force.
@@nunyabeezaxe2030 Already old, yet stupidest comment ever. It's because back then Europe was the center of the world's Economy and politics and were still colonial empires. The US had an isolationist mindset until the first WW. And then shit happened in the US with the black tuesday and this helped the spread of nazism and fascism in the developed world in a single decade.
Somehow, despite this being a crucial part of European politics, there is not much comprehensive information on this topic but this was a great video. Thanks :)
Glad you liked the video, I think the problem is that there are no European media companies focusing on these things. That's what I'd like in part to address with this channel!
here's another nugget of info, the poster forgot to mention: a direct consequence of the green deal is the deindustrialization of the nations and expropriation of its citizens. Changing energy consumption and production should be done by investing in new technologies and maybe subsidizing them where it is reasonable to do so. Instead this is mostly done by requiring companies to pay a sort of fine in the form of "CO2-taxes". So those that emit more than allocated to them, have to buy certificates similar to how you buy stocks. Every year the total supply of available certificates is reduced, so when they initially cost ~5€ per ton of CO2, they now cost 100€. So what does any reasonable company do? They leave the EU and take their jobs and taxes with them. Those companies that stay obviously have to raise prices to stay competitive, so this is a direct cause of the rampant inflation and so the citizens pay for this CO2 tax. The eu is led by incompetence and ideology and is regularly overstepping its boundaries on national governance and needs to be completely reformed. The only valid purpose the eu has, is to protect it's borders and that's the one issue they completely failed with.
Holy, such quality content, with sources. This is incredible. How haven't you reached 10k subs yet? These videos are of legitimate quality and very informative. Thank you.
Nuclear energy produced 50% of Europe's clean electricity in 2017. Most studies on a low carbon Europe predict that nuclear will be about 30% of the European energy mix in the most cost optimal scenario. It's insane that Nuclear is not yet included in the Green taxonomy yet. That's a huge gamble on our climate.
Nuclear is by far the most cost effect and cleanest form of energy production we have to date... Not sure where you get your information from. The only thing that can make nuclear expensive is over taxation.
it amazes me how always when talking about nuclear they NEVER take in account that a single incident is a disaster FOREVER, and that nuclear waste last FOREVER as well, and managing wastes is expensive as fu... but somehow that is never take into consideration by pro nuclear arguments. Just for this should not be an option for anyone but for a nuclear plant owner.
you blind and silly, , the eu has time and time again proved to us that eu does not work and will never work, it’s a club for the rich northern states, look what they have done to your own country Spain, it should have been left as the EEC , European economic community, it worked perfectly well, not this bullshit political union.,
@@ildile8248 Yhea, but lots of their policies are stupid. For exemple Germany doesn't want nuclear because than it could have the monopoly of gas sales in Europe (imported from Russia). ESA is a complet failure as a space agencie and there is not big tech company. EU's inovation is almost dead. To turn it worse. EU is already passing a bad time trying to become green but they want to produce lots of batteries and hydrogen wich are absurdly energy intensive. Worst of all, the EU has lots of bureocracy wich makes it harder for companies to invest. EU really needs to improve
The Netherlands received billions in profit from its gas fields. Gas is connected to every Dutch home. For a number of years, the Netherlands has closed its own gas fields and is now importing gas from Norway and Russia. While gas is being promoted in Germany, Dutch homes are being forced to switch to electricity. This costs almost € 10,000 per home! The new houses no longer have a gas connection.
In a perfectly efficient house you shouldn’t need gas at all 🤷🏼♂️ Let’s not forget NL was brought to court (and lost) for failing in its climate policy
The Netherlands is also running out of gas. That's why they had to close the Groningen field. This is actually a common theme for Europe: local resources have been long used up leaving the continent a big importer. This certainly makes it easy to be green.
If economically weaker countries put the money into unsustainable investments their economy will be still behind in 10 years, because consumers will demand sustainability in the future. It's actually the economically smartest thing to put all your money in sustainable tech
Poor countries have no money and especialy not trillions of dollars to throw away. Their only way is to get dirty industry which is moving out of first world due to regulations like China did. They also have an issue of skyrocketing population growth. Altough GDP has and will grow its still going to be very low per capita. If you had 8 children you too would be poor even if you earn 2000 €
this is categorically not true, in fact the opposite is the case. higher carbon emissions per person are directly related to higher quality of life, including literacy, education, lower mortality, higher income per capita, and so on. on average, the more greenhouse gases a country produces, the more developed that nation and its peoples are. its a moral dilemma because modernization takes a massive environmental toll. developing nations want to modernize yet already developed nations want to put ecological restrictions in place that the entire world adheres to. essentially, green initiatives serve as barriers to developing nations. its not as simple as “build more dams” or “use solar.” developing as a nation requires a massive carbon footprint.
Would make sense but they are expecting company's whos main market is not EU from tis regulations but they can still deliver to EU, they will kill EU company's with this if it does not apply to everyone selling in EU...
@@ballsack4581 Except per capita emissions in the countries withe the highest living standards are in fact lower than in the actually highest emitters, like the gulf states and the US
It's really simple if you just look at physics and not politics : a nuclear renaissance like France in the 70's will eliminate all fossil fuels in the electricity sector, and allow fot it's production to tripple or quadruple in order to electrify transports, industries... . But no, Germany is trying to get all of europe to follow it's model of Energiewende, where they spent 300+ billions for not even lowering the carbon footpring of it's electricity, therefore nether reducing it's global/national carbon footprint
Where is all the money they are going to spend comming from? 2,8 Trillion EURO. It sounds like the kind of policy that makes a lot of poor people even more poor. As if there was not growing powerty in EU already.
Unia to zło które rozłewa się na całą Europę, to sidła w które wpadamy świadomie lub mniej, z każdym rokiem jesteśmy bardziej od niej zależni i mamy więcej ograniczeń i podatków a mniej swobody. Mamy dwie drogi aby z nią walczyć 1.wyjść z Unii 2.ostro się jej przeciwstawiać wraz z innymi krajami równie niezadowolonymi z jej polityki tak jak i my w innym przypadku będziemy żyli pod całkowita kontrola ,dyktaturą i inwigilacją.
Nothing wrong with that. You should invest into cheap energy until you get to the level of wealth of western Europe, then start thinking about saving the planet
I don't know about Czechs but in Poland the percentage of energy made from renewable sources has dubled in the last decade and is around the same level as in The Netherlands so don't spread miss information.
@@Alaryk111 misinformation? If anyone is spreading misinformation its you. It might that renewable energy has doubled, but that doesn't change the fact , that Poland still gets around 70% of it's energy from coal. euracoal.eu/info/country-profiles/poland/ And whilst it is true that the percentage of renewable energy is around that of the Netherlands that doesn't change the fact that the Netherlands is mainly relying on natural gas, wich leads to less carbon emissions and is therefore obviously not as harmful as coal.
Czech Republic has set the target for the exit from coal to be the same as Germany - 2038, coming from higher proportion of coal power plants in the electricity generation. I'm not saying it's good. It's miserable. I'm just saying it's more like so in various EU countries.
@@Alaryk111 Bullshit, spreading you are, sir. Coal is efficent and Poland produces more than 90% of energy from coal, oil and gas which all 3 are CO2 emitting. Nuclear Power is better but we have no native technology to build it.
@BrenFX I currently have a Discord chat where people can give input! discord.gg/R9YsrBg8 I was eventually going to ask people for more help for making the videos themselves, so if you're interested in that, shoot me an email so we can have a chat! Into.Europe@outlook.com
The idea that we should change the definition of sustainability so more businesses fit in the definition is silly to say the least, businesses must change to fit in with our new sustainability motives.
Just a personal opinion but I don't like the puppet that much , you could replace it by a face to camera or by some graphic design like TLDR does. Additionally, you could work a bit on the transition to make it smoother. Nice job on choosing the subject! it feels like it lacks depth but I guess that is the limit of short videos :')
we need much harsher punishments for tax evasion and fraud in the millions range, and so tough regulations on environmental regulations that anyone caught violating them gets to pay for ALL the cleanup and get super large fines along with being thrown in jail. while companies headquartered outside of EU has to pay some ridiculous sized fines for importing products in violation with Environmental Protection
What we truly need is a way to force companies/consumers to pay for externalities, i.e. the costs of the damages fossil fuels and other non-sustainable methods do to the environment. That way, the price of fossil fuels would reflect their actual costs and renewable energy would become much more competitive.
lol im asking you, where is Eu importing those mineral just to go green? China mostly, do China really care about the environment when extracting those mineral?
then perhaps its time for extreme environmental sanctions to be put on any country or corporations which dosn't follow the most hardy climate protection laws. We could follow that up with a reform of NATO to include Japan, south Korea, Taiwan, Phillipines, Australia and New Zealand and any other nations we could convince. and if China dosn't shift its environmental policies we blockade suez canal, the strait of malacca and any overseas route into China and stop them getting oil and grain
Great to see a fellow European explain European issues. I'm a Volt Member and I generally cannot find that much of good channels that cover Europe constantly.
... this is a cluster fuck and will never even come close to being effective and even change whatsoever. We need grassroots level action and top dow facilitation. This busines/corporate approach is doomed to fail.
How can I afford a electromobile for 100k euros, when I have 800 euros monthly salary? It's better for me to go to the bazaar, grey or worse black market and there buy refurbished normal car (benzin, oil) for 1k euros? That should be question, which should be answered by EU instead of "gender equality" bullshits.
What countries are poor east ? Since central European countries are once of the richest in world but also richer than southern Europe?! Unless you meant true East (Romania, Bulgaria)and southern Europe
@@eunanavesani6074 Germany; Switzerland; North Italy; Austria; Slovenia; Czechia; Poland are Central European countries. Slovakia; Hungary; Croatian; Romania; Bulgaria; Greece are South Eastern European countries.
Transforming our economies towards sustainability will definitely hurt in the short-term, but we will reap the benefits in the long-term. Glad that Europe takes the lead.
@@ChrisM186 europe is self sustainable with its vast reserves of recources and besides America is with us and China right now is very unpredictable so we can really rely on them
Losing all of your manufacturing and being strategically autonomous are diametrically opposed goals. Will any of this actually address the issue, or just ship it to other countries while virtue signaling?
I think unless the rest of Europe follows France's example, and starts going real into Nuclear. Everyhing they do well be in vain as far green deals go. But I'm American so what do i know
Ireland and Norway (plus Scotland) could produce more electricity than they need through wind alone 🤷🏼♂️ Spain, Portugal and Greece could be solar powerhouses too
@@kms_scharnhorst Where do we put all that toxic waste if we get most of power from nuclear? Also who are photovoltaics and wind turbines killing? A few bits sure but people? 🙄 Let’s be real
@@kms_scharnhorst I stand corrected. However nuclear still comes out worse than wind per TWH when you measure deaths in that way: energyforhumanity.org/en/briefings/energy/nuclear-power-and-safety-the-facts/ Sure nuclear waste can be dealt with reasonably easily when it accounts for only a minority of our electricity production, but if it was the majority? We’d need an awful lot of storage and with huge risks (even if the likelihood of an accident is low). In a continent so densely populated where could we put it all so that it away from population centres, farmland and precious ecosystems? I’m no opposed to nuclear per se but I am opposed to it being our sole source of electricity. Fusion on the other hand however... well we’ll wait and see
@@kms_scharnhorst Lol I don’t often say this and though I’m still a fan of offshore wind turbines, I do think you have a point! Maybe European society (myself included) has internalised biases lingering against nuclear power because of Chernobyl 🤷🏼♂️ Such an emotive topic it’s hard to get beyond the knee-jerk. I don’t see it selling for most tbh unfortunately
Well that’ll certainly make them ‘green’ as all industry & commerce will leave for countries with cheap energy. All for a theory that has failed to meet any of its predictions.
One thing I've learned is most Climate Change policy isn't meant to control the climate, but the people. Thr whole point is to give government more power and money while the politicians funnel huge sums of money to their donors who invest in a lot of these "Green Companies". That's why they have to treat Climate Change as a crisis instead of just another challenge. A crisis demands immediate action without time for the public to review, or question the proposals. It's also why they won't go the sensible route and invest in Nuclear energy. That means far less opportunities to seize power and money.
@@ShamanMcLamie - Lots of good points there! You can tell the whole thing is largely phoney by the way it’s been turned into a quasi-religion with its preachers (Obama, Al Gore), idiot savants who see visions (Greta), true believers and deniers (who Obama wanted the mob to ‘call out’).
@@IntoEurope ah ok. It`s confusing. Because we always use Million Milliarde Billionen Billiarden Trillionen Trilliarden and so on in Germany and if I her some interviews with numbers I get confused. Why can`t we just take one and the same system. Like everyone use m km cm ...
Not yet, most hydrogen is currently being produced through a process called steam reforming which involves breaking apart methane molecules (and emits a lot of CO2). Green hydrogen production from water will take a while to scale up. Cheers, Hugo
@@IntoEurope ohh in that way, sorry. It's also a waste product during the production of polypropylene from propylene-gas (my father works in a plant), I'm guessing it happens in most polymetrisation processes (and others for sure). thanks for clarifying!
This is as always a very good idea, but as much as I love the EU I know that we will not acomplish this goals with all the money it will cost and how stupid the politicians are of the EU contries
@@kms_scharnhorst I’m talking about increasing spending in ways that haven’t been done before using contemporary monetary theory... The status quo is far more damaging.
@@kms_scharnhorst You’ll find that the modern theory of inflation is that it is only caused by increases in the money scale on a large scale. Billions are nothing in the $15 trillion EU economy. The EU is very transparent about how and where it spends money. Much better than most national governments lol and if wind turbines are so inefficient; why is it so successful in Ireland and Denmark? Not only efficient but beautiful monuments of humanity. This is about more than that anyways. I mean public transport projects, building retrofitting, forestry planting, investment in green R&D and education. This could all be financed without taxation and the bring immense benefits to society.
@@kms_scharnhorst Energy power plants need to go somewhere and 10km off the coast seems like a good place to me tbh! I’m not suggesting no taxation, nor even lowering taxation. I’m saying particular public investments could be paid for through the ECB. Ones that drive innovation, efficiency, trade and economic integration. The dividends would far outweigh any cost 🤷🏼♂️ We could be world leaders in these areas with a little ambition, most especially in the Covid recovery. We can’t afford a 2008 style recovery again but we also can’t afford our projected emissions under this plan.Think of it as a Marshall plan but to ourselves and future generations.
@@kms_scharnhorst I’m still not sure you understand what I’m talking about... I’m not talking about loans per se or debt. The ECB pays and no one pays them back. If you haven’t studied advanced macroeconomics in the past 5 years you likely don’t. We’re talking about completely different things.
@@ChrisM186 LOL you can catch it but you can't sell it, and your captures are no good for fish and chips. the fishing industrie at UK is piss off for a reason.
Really great for you, even you are a dutch, but waited 4 minutes 51 seconds to mention the favourite theme of dutchs: the differenciating between rich West and poor East. This is a kind of psychological fixation to all dutch, quoting wrongly geographic names: "Eastern EU" is correct, but not "Eastern Europe", because Central Europe is not Eastern Europe. And of course "rich" / "poor" also very simplyfiyng, and false, and very easily misleading, if you know, that compare to the whole world these central european (but eastern EU) countries are on between the highest development index countries of the world, so mentioning them as "poor" giving a very bad sense of reality from your perspective, if we know on the world level 80% of the population are poorer than these so called "poors". But of course, for a dutch it should be really remarkable again to feel yourself as someone, who legitimized his existence, between the real great countries surrounding you (Germany, UK, France) who always opress you, small Netherland, but now you should feel yourelf somebody compare to these "poor eastern" guys. But I think there should be some other therapy for this issue, then to creating videos on the RUclips...
worst option ever. why just not remove all taxes. then only put taxes on pollution and climate change things. if you want to kill something the easiest way is to impose taxes on it. say a flat rate a certain amount of money per ton of co2 equivalent. and then not let governments invest in green energy since that always goes to shit compared to free market solutions
![EU Green Deal Masterclass [EN] - Introduction (1/11)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wkpLv8wbJZk/mqdefault.jpg)
The algorithm finally decided to show me this channel after 15 random cat, anime fights and one guy failing to make a simple spin on a skate video, the universe is restored
I think this is my favorite comment since I started my RUclips channel
@@IntoEurope hey i dont know if you have made one (at least i cant find it in your channel ) can you do one for the migrant push by the turks in greece that happened some months ago and the entire crisis among these 2 nations?
Sidenote :great job btw
Take a look at "real engineering" if you don't know the channel. Worth to check.
@@billvilmezis5968 Naah - we have heard so much about refugees. This is looking at all what is wrong in the world. It is much better to look at all what is right in the world. Or what could be right. Eg a internal marked for the EU from Lisabon to Vladivostok. Was that something?? :)
@@mortenlund1418 my point for asking that is the fact that if that problem was dealt with any future progect would have more funds
EU politics are rediculously underreported for how influential they really are.
Glad to see at least someone reporting on what's going on there!
@RoastWorthy Technically they didn't really win any elections though, they did get a fairly high vote count but it was far short of a complete win. But they also had a few hundred thousand strong militia and the Germany political system was breaking down and some kind of autocracy was probably going to happen. It being a bit of a question if the Nazi, the conservative nationalist or communists would win.
Well the conservatives thought they could use the Nazi against the communists, but in the end they were wrong and Nazi managed a coup d'etat taking all power for themselves.
Though in some more modern cases the autocratic government basically did win a election and just pulled more and more power to themselves over time. So it's still a very real threat to a democracy. It's just not the way the Nazi took power, where the lesson in part is, don't let major political parties have their own private militia/army.
@RoastWorthy Of course the Nazi are to blame, they did a coup d'etat. That's a super hostile action that's completely deliberate on their side.
The conservatives were just trying to do their best with a really bad hand as if they didn't compromise with one of both sides it probably would be a civil war. This due to Germany being limited to a 100k army that would not easily be able to put down several 100k militia. In hindsight the conservatives seem to have decided that maybe they should have chosen the civil war rather then think they could some how keep some kind of moderating control on one of the two radical factions.
In any case, my main point was more the Nazi didn't gain power by winning an election, they did a hostile take over by force.
@RoastWorthy
When shit goes down in the US world wars do not happen. When shit goes down in Europe it's uh-oh...
It’s because it’s boring as hell lol
@@nunyabeezaxe2030 Already old, yet stupidest comment ever. It's because back then Europe was the center of the world's Economy and politics and were still colonial empires. The US had an isolationist mindset until the first WW. And then shit happened in the US with the black tuesday and this helped the spread of nazism and fascism in the developed world in a single decade.
Somehow, despite this being a crucial part of European politics, there is not much comprehensive information on this topic but this was a great video. Thanks :)
Glad you liked the video, I think the problem is that there are no European media companies focusing on these things. That's what I'd like in part to address with this channel!
here's another nugget of info, the poster forgot to mention: a direct consequence of the green deal is the deindustrialization of the nations and expropriation of its citizens. Changing energy consumption and production should be done by investing in new technologies and maybe subsidizing them where it is reasonable to do so.
Instead this is mostly done by requiring companies to pay a sort of fine in the form of "CO2-taxes". So those that emit more than allocated to them, have to buy certificates similar to how you buy stocks. Every year the total supply of available certificates is reduced, so when they initially cost ~5€ per ton of CO2, they now cost 100€.
So what does any reasonable company do? They leave the EU and take their jobs and taxes with them. Those companies that stay obviously have to raise prices to stay competitive, so this is a direct cause of the rampant inflation and so the citizens pay for this CO2 tax.
The eu is led by incompetence and ideology and is regularly overstepping its boundaries on national governance and needs to be completely reformed.
The only valid purpose the eu has, is to protect it's borders and that's the one issue they completely failed with.
One of the best channels on this topic, I'm surprised you don't have more viewers!
Thank you! :)
They will come. +1 from today.
Come on people, lets get him to 1k subs so he can at least get some revenue from this awesome content and his hard work !
Thanks man! It means a lot :)
Subscribed
Just subscribed. His channel is booming right now.
almost at 10k now, he deserves more.
mission accomplished lmao
Algorithm be praised! 🙃 I needed a channel like this. 😇
Glad you enjoy it! :)
The problem of the world: LOBBYISTS. 🙄
corporate ones
Unroot private capital
It's insane you have videos of this quality with under 20k subscribers. Nice job dude
Always happy about new videos here! =)
Glad you like them!
Holy, such quality content, with sources. This is incredible. How haven't you reached 10k subs yet? These videos are of legitimate quality and very informative. Thank you.
wow, this channel is really good, give it a bit and you'll get past at least 100k in no time.
Nuclear energy produced 50% of Europe's clean electricity in 2017. Most studies on a low carbon Europe predict that nuclear will be about 30% of the European energy mix in the most cost optimal scenario.
It's insane that Nuclear is not yet included in the Green taxonomy yet. That's a huge gamble on our climate.
Germany is regressive
@@greenmachine5600 The main problem Germany has with nuclear energy (at a state level) is that they don't have companies which could profit from it.
Nuclear is by far the most cost effect and cleanest form of energy production we have to date... Not sure where you get your information from. The only thing that can make nuclear expensive is over taxation.
it amazes me how always when talking about nuclear they NEVER take in account that a single incident is a disaster FOREVER, and that nuclear waste last FOREVER as well, and managing wastes is expensive as fu... but somehow that is never take into consideration by pro nuclear arguments.
Just for this should not be an option for anyone but for a nuclear plant owner.
@@Daniel-nt5gh add the waste into munition and fire it at Washington
Not the channel we deserve, but the channel we need - keep up the great work!!!🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺
Just suscribe😊😊
Hi from Spain.
If the EU wants to survive we need to create a federation in the next 20 years.
Yup and i quess thats exactly what they are working on
EU must become indipendent from the USA and not getting influenced by China imo.
They could start by stopping to ignore corruption in Spain...
you blind and silly, , the eu has time and time again proved to us that eu does not work and will never work, it’s a club for the rich northern states, look what they have done to your own country Spain, it should have been left as the EEC , European economic community, it worked perfectly well, not this bullshit political union.,
@@ildile8248 Yhea, but lots of their policies are stupid. For exemple Germany doesn't want nuclear because than it could have the monopoly of gas sales in Europe (imported from Russia). ESA is a complet failure as a space agencie and there is not big tech company. EU's inovation is almost dead. To turn it worse. EU is already passing a bad time trying to become green but they want to produce lots of batteries and hydrogen wich are absurdly energy intensive. Worst of all, the EU has lots of bureocracy wich makes it harder for companies to invest. EU really needs to improve
The Netherlands received billions in profit from its gas fields. Gas is connected to every Dutch home. For a number of years, the Netherlands has closed its own gas fields and is now importing gas from Norway and Russia. While gas is being promoted in Germany, Dutch homes are being forced to switch to electricity. This costs almost € 10,000 per home! The new houses no longer have a gas connection.
In a perfectly efficient house you shouldn’t need gas at all 🤷🏼♂️ Let’s not forget NL was brought to court (and lost) for failing in its climate policy
The Netherlands is also running out of gas. That's why they had to close the Groningen field. This is actually a common theme for Europe: local resources have been long used up leaving the continent a big importer. This certainly makes it easy to be green.
If economically weaker countries put the money into unsustainable investments their economy will be still behind in 10 years, because consumers will demand sustainability in the future. It's actually the economically smartest thing to put all your money in sustainable tech
Poor countries have no money and especialy not trillions of dollars to throw away. Their only way is to get dirty industry which is moving out of first world due to regulations like China did.
They also have an issue of skyrocketing population growth. Altough GDP has and will grow its still going to be very low per capita.
If you had 8 children you too would be poor even if you earn 2000 €
this is categorically not true, in fact the opposite is the case.
higher carbon emissions per person are directly related to higher quality of life, including literacy, education, lower mortality, higher income per capita, and so on. on average, the more greenhouse gases a country produces, the more developed that nation and its peoples are.
its a moral dilemma because modernization takes a massive environmental toll. developing nations want to modernize yet already developed nations want to put ecological restrictions in place that the entire world adheres to.
essentially, green initiatives serve as barriers to developing nations. its not as simple as “build more dams” or “use solar.” developing as a nation requires a massive carbon footprint.
Would make sense but they are expecting company's whos main market is not EU from tis regulations but they can still deliver to EU, they will kill EU company's with this if it does not apply to everyone selling in EU...
@@ballsack4581 Except per capita emissions in the countries withe the highest living standards are in fact lower than in the actually highest emitters, like the gulf states and the US
You sir, you have a new subscriber. Cheers from crazy Florida.
Thanks for sharing your sources! Great video
Nuclear fission is the best bet and energy Storage
Wow how a good deal of info packed in just 8 mins. Congrats!
It's really simple if you just look at physics and not politics : a nuclear renaissance like France in the 70's will eliminate all fossil fuels in the electricity sector, and allow fot it's production to tripple or quadruple in order to electrify transports, industries...
.
But no, Germany is trying to get all of europe to follow it's model of Energiewende, where they spent 300+ billions for not even lowering the carbon footpring of it's electricity, therefore nether reducing it's global/national carbon footprint
Thankyou for the exploration Info 😄🤓😸👍🏼
So proud to be european 🇪🇺⭐❤
Freak
Where are you from?
🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺
@@Tanu.90 🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱🇽🇰🇽🇰🇽🇰
This is evil, you can't see it
Where is all the money they are going to spend comming from? 2,8 Trillion EURO. It sounds like the kind of policy that makes a lot of poor people even more poor. As if there was not growing powerty in EU already.
Werde mir alle Videos ansehen die du bisher produziert hast.
The algorithm finally decided to show me this, great video! subscribed :)
Unia to zło które rozłewa się na całą Europę, to sidła w które wpadamy świadomie lub mniej, z każdym rokiem jesteśmy bardziej od niej zależni i mamy więcej ograniczeń i podatków a mniej swobody. Mamy dwie drogi aby z nią walczyć 1.wyjść z Unii 2.ostro się jej przeciwstawiać wraz z innymi krajami równie niezadowolonymi z jej polityki tak jak i my w innym przypadku będziemy żyli pod całkowita kontrola ,dyktaturą i inwigilacją.
Didnt watch but liked and comment! Thanks for keeping up with this good work
Activists don't have to run a country....Pragmatic people do.
It's not about ECOLOGY, it's about who pays whom. This whole PSEUDO-ECOLOGY is a money changer.
The biggest scam of our lifetime.
After EU of course
Meanwhile in Poland and the Czech Republic: hold my coal
Nothing wrong with that. You should invest into cheap energy until you get to the level of wealth of western Europe, then start thinking about saving the planet
I don't know about Czechs but in Poland the percentage of energy made from renewable sources has dubled in the last decade and is around the same level as in The Netherlands so don't spread miss information.
@@Alaryk111 misinformation? If anyone is spreading misinformation its you. It might that renewable energy has doubled, but that doesn't change the fact , that Poland still gets around 70% of it's energy from coal. euracoal.eu/info/country-profiles/poland/
And whilst it is true that the percentage of renewable energy is around that of the Netherlands that doesn't change the fact that the Netherlands is mainly relying on natural gas, wich leads to less carbon emissions and is therefore obviously not as harmful as coal.
Czech Republic has set the target for the exit from coal to be the same as Germany - 2038, coming from higher proportion of coal power plants in the electricity generation.
I'm not saying it's good. It's miserable. I'm just saying it's more like so in various EU countries.
@@Alaryk111 Bullshit, spreading you are, sir.
Coal is efficent and Poland produces more than 90% of energy from coal, oil and gas which all 3 are CO2 emitting.
Nuclear Power is better but we have no native technology to build it.
omg, I didn't know about this thank you, and thanks to the algorithm.
Keep it up and you'll have tons of subs!
Thank you :)
This is really good stuff. If you even want a hand, I'm doing European studies and would be happy to help out.
@BrenFX I currently have a Discord chat where people can give input! discord.gg/R9YsrBg8
I was eventually going to ask people for more help for making the videos themselves, so if you're interested in that, shoot me an email so we can have a chat! Into.Europe@outlook.com
Long live the european union!
Lol
The idea that we should change the definition of sustainability so more businesses fit in the definition is silly to say the least, businesses must change to fit in with our new sustainability motives.
The market should sort out what the people prefer the most.
So informative!
I'm worried about the federalisation of Europe and the allocation of resources. The risk for waste and corruption is high.
Bravo!
Thank you!
Thank you
I'm the only one seeing the shape of a face in the video's thumbnail ? Between Italy and the Balkans
Great content and nice voice!
Thank you! :)
nice vid
subbed
Just a personal opinion but I don't like the puppet that much , you could replace it by a face to camera or by some graphic design like TLDR does.
Additionally, you could work a bit on the transition to make it smoother.
Nice job on choosing the subject! it feels like it lacks depth but I guess that is the limit of short videos :')
Nuclear energy is vastly important
we need much harsher punishments for tax evasion and fraud in the millions range, and so tough regulations on environmental regulations that anyone caught violating them gets to pay for ALL the cleanup and get super large fines along with being thrown in jail. while companies headquartered outside of EU has to pay some ridiculous sized fines for importing products in violation with Environmental Protection
What we truly need is a way to force companies/consumers to pay for externalities, i.e. the costs of the damages fossil fuels and other non-sustainable methods do to the environment. That way, the price of fossil fuels would reflect their actual costs and renewable energy would become much more competitive.
LOL imagine that happen in our byzantine corporacracy
lol im asking you, where is Eu importing those mineral just to go green? China mostly, do China really care about the environment when extracting those mineral?
then perhaps its time for extreme environmental sanctions to be put on any country or corporations which dosn't follow the most hardy climate protection laws. We could follow that up with a reform of NATO to include Japan, south Korea, Taiwan, Phillipines, Australia and New Zealand and any other nations we could convince. and if China dosn't shift its environmental policies we blockade suez canal, the strait of malacca and any overseas route into China and stop them getting oil and grain
Good luck with France in reforming CAP
Raising a trillion Euros through extra tax!!!!! Will China and India be on board? If that aren't this won't change anything.
I’m afraid scientists get a back seat to industry in this deal which could ultimately most like you do more harm than good on such a crucial issue
Reform the CAP!
sir what do u mean by 'non-binding' 1:27 i hear this in my EU class in uni all the time and im lost as to what it means
Hi, that means that countries have no legal obligation to follow-up on the agreement!
Cheers,
Hugo
Eu wants but has no idea how but just smack a shitload of money on it.
why do you call the contract non-binding? it is actually binding the countries because it is a international treaty!
Fossil fuel lobbyists? So it becomes the Grilled Loo Deal
What about Poorer EU countries, Like Hungary, Bulgaria, Etc?
How will they be Green?
Also, Nuclear Energy is good.
Great to see a fellow European explain European issues. I'm a Volt Member and I generally cannot find that much of good channels that cover Europe constantly.
French* ;) (but also European)
@@IntoEurope yeah your just perfect pronunciation of Rotterdam guided me a bit to there hahaha
Eww, federalism
... this is a cluster fuck and will never even come close to being effective and even change whatsoever. We need grassroots level action and top dow facilitation. This busines/corporate approach is doomed to fail.
Hope things work out and the rest of the world follow Europe's steps in becoming greener economies.
😂
I noticed you don’t have a Lithuanian translation of ‘Into Europe’ rolling, that would be ‘Į Europą’
Thanks man theye are great
How can you talk for more than 8 minutes about the green deal without mentioning how they dropped the „new“ in the middle?
How can I afford a electromobile for 100k euros, when I have 800 euros monthly salary? It's better for me to go to the bazaar, grey or worse black market and there buy refurbished normal car (benzin, oil) for 1k euros? That should be question, which should be answered by EU instead of "gender equality" bullshits.
That's the point, the plebs won't be able to own the cars, you will be tied to the land the rulers will want you in, just like in feudalism.
What countries are poor east ? Since central European countries are once of the richest in world but also richer than southern Europe?! Unless you meant true East (Romania, Bulgaria)and southern Europe
Wich countries are Central europe and South europe.
I mean true East of Europe is over the Black Sea, I guess you mean East of the EU
@@eunanavesani6074 Germany; Switzerland; North Italy; Austria; Slovenia; Czechia; Poland are Central European countries.
Slovakia; Hungary; Croatian; Romania; Bulgaria; Greece are South Eastern European countries.
Dutch voice actor?
Transforming our economies towards sustainability will definitely hurt in the short-term, but we will reap the benefits in the long-term. Glad that Europe takes the lead.
Dream on...
Thanks said China. For every unit of pollution you reduce, we can make one more and cheaply develop our economy.
@Zuurker U We will have to continue buying from the Chinese because our energy costs will be too high.
@@ChrisM186 europe is self sustainable with its vast reserves of recources and besides America is with us and China right now is very unpredictable so we can really rely on them
@@masculineman123Sure if you count Russia as part Europe
Losing all of your manufacturing and being strategically autonomous are diametrically opposed goals. Will any of this actually address the issue, or just ship it to other countries while virtue signaling?
Greece is doing great improvements we keep on using solar panels
Well done Greece!
Where does the graphic come from @5:26? 58% from fossil foil companies is an interesting point...
It's from Corporate Observatory Europe, an NGO that looks into corporate influence in European politics!
@@IntoEurope thank you. 👍
I think unless the rest of Europe follows France's example, and starts going real into Nuclear. Everyhing they do well be in vain as far green deals go. But I'm American so what do i know
Ireland and Norway (plus Scotland) could produce more electricity than they need through wind alone 🤷🏼♂️ Spain, Portugal and Greece could be solar powerhouses too
@@kms_scharnhorst Where do we put all that toxic waste if we get most of power from nuclear? Also who are photovoltaics and wind turbines killing? A few bits sure but people? 🙄 Let’s be real
@@kms_scharnhorst I stand corrected. However nuclear still comes out worse than wind per TWH when you measure deaths in that way: energyforhumanity.org/en/briefings/energy/nuclear-power-and-safety-the-facts/ Sure nuclear waste can be dealt with reasonably easily when it accounts for only a minority of our electricity production, but if it was the majority? We’d need an awful lot of storage and with huge risks (even if the likelihood of an accident is low). In a continent so densely populated where could we put it all so that it away from population centres, farmland and precious ecosystems? I’m no opposed to nuclear per se but I am opposed to it being our sole source of electricity. Fusion on the other hand however... well we’ll wait and see
@@kms_scharnhorst Lol I don’t often say this and though I’m still a fan of offshore wind turbines, I do think you have a point! Maybe European society (myself included) has internalised biases lingering against nuclear power because of Chernobyl 🤷🏼♂️ Such an emotive topic it’s hard to get beyond the knee-jerk. I don’t see it selling for most tbh unfortunately
Only issue with nuclear is start up cost and time from planning until energy production
Back to 3 or 4 toilet flushes folks.
On paper it looks green.
Well that’ll certainly make them ‘green’ as all industry & commerce will leave for countries with cheap energy. All for a theory that has failed to meet any of its predictions.
One thing I've learned is most Climate Change policy isn't meant to control the climate, but the people. Thr whole point is to give government more power and money while the politicians funnel huge sums of money to their donors who invest in a lot of these "Green Companies". That's why they have to treat Climate Change as a crisis instead of just another challenge. A crisis demands immediate action without time for the public to review, or question the proposals. It's also why they won't go the sensible route and invest in Nuclear energy. That means far less opportunities to seize power and money.
@@ShamanMcLamie - Lots of good points there! You can tell the whole thing is largely phoney by the way it’s been turned into a quasi-religion with its preachers (Obama, Al Gore), idiot savants who see visions (Greta), true believers and deniers (who Obama wanted the mob to ‘call out’).
>All for a theory that has failed to meet any of its predictions.
Australia sends its regards.
Going for the Kingdom of Heaven.
Wait trillion? But the double of 500 billion€ is 1 billiards€ not 1 trillion€ or am I wrong?
Trillion is 1000 billion in English, I just checked.
But there are 2 existing scales: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers
@@IntoEurope ah ok. It`s confusing. Because we always use Million Milliarde Billionen Billiarden Trillionen Trilliarden and so on in Germany and if I her some interviews with numbers I get confused. Why can`t we just take one and the same system. Like everyone use m km cm ...
@@cooler_boi_patrick3989
Europeans use: million, milliard, billion, billiard.
English use: million, billion, trillion, quadrillion.
When you say 'trillion' you mean 'billion' in European terms right? 1,000,000,000,000,?
A trillion is a trillion no matter where you go. The confusion starts when you compare it to other languages
@@Grindsetillionaire NO it is not.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trillion
@@Daniel-nt5gh these days everybody uses a trillion to define 1000 billion
5:32 what's wrong with hyrdogen?? it's as clean as it can be?
Not yet, most hydrogen is currently being produced through a process called steam reforming which involves breaking apart methane molecules (and emits a lot of CO2). Green hydrogen production from water will take a while to scale up.
Cheers,
Hugo
@@IntoEurope ohh in that way, sorry. It's also a waste product during the production of polypropylene from propylene-gas (my father works in a plant), I'm guessing it happens in most polymetrisation processes (and others for sure).
thanks for clarifying!
These guys have a Patreon: www.patreon.com/IntoEurope
good to pay for the hate spread before trying to get out of oil !
How do I make my hair
Wlgorithm i love you love you love you give this man lovely views plz
Did they get Gretas permission
End of human rights a transformation into chinese system?
What?
Para o algoritmo
This is as always a very good idea, but as much as I love the EU I know that we will not acomplish this goals with all the money it will cost and how stupid the politicians are of the EU contries
They could find at least some of it through the ECB but all politicians are too economically conservative and unambitious to attempt this :(
@@kms_scharnhorst I’m talking about increasing spending in ways that haven’t been done before using contemporary monetary theory... The status quo is far more damaging.
@@kms_scharnhorst You’ll find that the modern theory of inflation is that it is only caused by increases in the money scale on a large scale. Billions are nothing in the $15 trillion EU economy. The EU is very transparent about how and where it spends money. Much better than most national governments lol and if wind turbines are so inefficient; why is it so successful in Ireland and Denmark? Not only efficient but beautiful monuments of humanity. This is about more than that anyways. I mean public transport projects, building retrofitting, forestry planting, investment in green R&D and education. This could all be financed without taxation and the bring immense benefits to society.
@@kms_scharnhorst Energy power plants need to go somewhere and 10km off the coast seems like a good place to me tbh! I’m not suggesting no taxation, nor even lowering taxation. I’m saying particular public investments could be paid for through the ECB. Ones that drive innovation, efficiency, trade and economic integration. The dividends would far outweigh any cost 🤷🏼♂️ We could be world leaders in these areas with a little ambition, most especially in the Covid recovery. We can’t afford a 2008 style recovery again but we also can’t afford our projected emissions under this plan.Think of it as a Marshall plan but to ourselves and future generations.
@@kms_scharnhorst I’m still not sure you understand what I’m talking about... I’m not talking about loans per se or debt. The ECB pays and no one pays them back. If you haven’t studied advanced macroeconomics in the past 5 years you likely don’t. We’re talking about completely different things.
So glad we left the EU!
Yes your fish are really really happy. OTOH some are praying for France not shutting down it's electricity grid to the UK.
@@Daniel-nt5gh Yes indeed our fish are also very happy. Better caught by us than the French! XD
@@ChrisM186 LOL you can catch it but you can't sell it, and your captures are no good for fish and chips. the fishing industrie at UK is piss off for a reason.
WOUéééééé MRC MBS je suis tout de suite plus intelligent
green bitcoin is a must
DOGE
banning crypto is a must
Hahah my germanic president is near merkel 0:11 i guess they r friends
The green Khmers
🇧🇷📷📸
Really great for you, even you are a dutch, but waited 4 minutes 51 seconds to mention the favourite theme of dutchs: the differenciating between rich West and poor East. This is a kind of psychological fixation to all dutch, quoting wrongly geographic names: "Eastern EU" is correct, but not "Eastern Europe", because Central Europe is not Eastern Europe. And of course "rich" / "poor" also very simplyfiyng, and false, and very easily misleading, if you know, that compare to the whole world these central european (but eastern EU) countries are on between the highest development index countries of the world, so mentioning them as "poor" giving a very bad sense of reality from your perspective, if we know on the world level 80% of the population are poorer than these so called "poors".
But of course, for a dutch it should be really remarkable again to feel yourself as someone, who legitimized his existence, between the real great countries surrounding you (Germany, UK, France) who always opress you, small Netherland, but now you should feel yourelf somebody compare to these "poor eastern" guys.
But I think there should be some other therapy for this issue, then to creating videos on the RUclips...
“Poor East” lol. Eastern Europe is not poor, just not as affluent like some of the richest countries. Disliked because of it, otherwise good channel
🇪🇺🤝🇺🇸🤝🇬🇧(CANZUK)
worst option ever. why just not remove all taxes. then only put taxes on pollution and climate change things. if you want to kill something the easiest way is to impose taxes on it. say a flat rate a certain amount of money per ton of co2 equivalent. and then not let governments invest in green energy since that always goes to shit compared to free market solutions
they do have cap and trade schemes also the carbon taxes
I love how EU will explode with this green-joke
This makes me glad we left
Ci wszyscy od zielonego ładu i czystego powietrza powinni się zbadać u psychiatry czy z ich łbem jest wszystko ok