This Is The Most Hilarious Review Of My Movie, And It’s Not Even Out Yet
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- An angry Leftist wrote a hilarious "review" of my new film ”Am I Racist?"
Become a DailyWire+ member and watch the full show: bit.ly/4bEQDy6
LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. www.youtube.co...
Watch the full episode here: Ep. 1437 - bit.ly/4efOGtf
Stop giving your money to woke corporations that hate you. Get your Jeremy’s Razors today at bit.ly/3lSGpWa
Watch my hit documentary, “What Is A Woman?” here: utm.io/ueSdV
Represent the Sweet Baby Gang by shopping my merch: tinyurl.com/y5...
#MattWalsh #TheMattWalshShow #News #Politics #DailyWire #WhatIsAWoman
Rachael will dismiss this video as 'mansplaining'.
Typical She/Her strategy...go redundant then shift like a climbing elevator to oblivion. No more extra beans for those folks. Bring the laundry in to conceal the conceit of the excuse.
Yep-Word Salad 101
Nothing needs to make sense, to make sense. GenZ
Brilliant 😂@@mallorywest1535
She just needs to womanunderstand
More fem shaming language, like the late Kevin Samuels said ya can’t make this stuff up
@@jamessharp9790 sounds like it's the problem of the offended. If u gonna call anything mansplaning, men like me gonna go to that womanunderstand 🤷♂️ don't worry. My finance is in the know as well
Morgan freeman when asked about how to stop racism: "stop talking about it"
Excellent point to you and Morgan Freeman. Similarly I wish we could STOP discussing The View and yet I just made that post! 🤪
I hope Matt included thst clip
@@priscillajimenez27 usually people who keep asking these questions usually are.
Wouldn't that make Morgan Freeman racist?
@@RobyWanKenobiYou’re joking I hope.
Why don't you just tell them you identify as a non-racist, and they have to accept your truth?
This is the scene in Independence Day, when they call the world and tell them how to take down the aliens….
I'm stealing your line.
They'll just say that's not a gender. As if all the other 32 000 genders are real
Evil people can't identify as other things. That is for good people only.
Also good people get to identify others as evil, removing their ability to have an identity themselves. Else the system would not work.
Clever!
"The bad Matt Walsh"? She talks like a kindergartner.
Yes, there are many unmistakable clues in her review that indicate that her brain has not evolved past kindergarten. But we already know that most of them suffer from this same affliction. Hate, denial, egotism, propensity for drama, even violence, all those are the common ingredients of the left. Very sad what has happened to the human race.
That's her brainpower
Aka dei hire
thats how liberals think. Orange man bad.
If you ask "am I racist?", you must be racist. It's logical. Try it at a job interview. "So am I hired?".. Yes! You've just answered your own question. Congratulations, you start tomorrow.
4:12 the irony of accusing someone of being ignorant of their own racism while using "white man" as an insult.
Thinking about getting this movie is Walsh anti catholic or Christian ?
@@Machoman50ta He is a conservative, we can assume by the fact he works for Daily Wire, so it's very unlikely he is against Christianity or any of its denominations so long as they praise Jesus Christ as lord and savior
@@Machoman50ta I don't think it really matters very much.
Those who mind don't matter.
Those who matter don't mind.
Being called racist today means literally nothing.
Except for when they are obviously behaving as such.
Obviously, Matt Walsh is not, but other people are.
@ab ramelbin5631
Who? Name em
@@abramelbin5631and provide the proof
Adam Carolla famously said there has never been a better time to be a real Nazi…since everyone is being called one anyway.
True. The word has lost all meaning as it gets watered down. Now it's just people with massive chips on their shoulders and begging for someone to offend them so they can cash in on it.
Rachel seems very obsessed with race, almost like a...
Brown people need Rachel to speak for them, otherwise how will they ever be heard?
C***! ... Oh, you meant racist... 😝
Liberals can’t, and won’t, let racism die.
It's like they're terrified people will find out so they try to get ahead of it by virtue signaling and throwing other white people under the bus "It's not me it's them!" 🤡
Rrrrrracist!
Seems to me Rachel is the narrow minded bigot here. She hasn't even seen the film and yet has already cast judgement on what she ASSUMES it's about because she dislikes Matt.
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
She most likely has never seen Matt Walsh's material either, but ASSUMES she doesn't like it because other people like her said so.
Is it because she dislikes Matt or males in general.
She sounds like a kid writing this too
it sounds like she's the type of person who subscribes to the notion of 'if you have to ask if you're racist, well then you definitely ARE'. aka, we're all racist by default, aka we're racist and we just don't know it, aka we're racist because we think we're not, etc etc. all racism, all the time is the idea here. gotta have _racebrain,_ 24/7/365(366 when applicable).
ChatGPT wrote 80% of that article.
101% more like
Chatgpt would have written a much better text
Agreed! I actually decided to have a conversation with ChatGPT last week and ask it if black privilege existed, and the answer was super long, explaining that it was a complicated subject and blah blah blah....then it even talking about slavery.... wtf?? Then I said give me a short answer, yes or no, and ChatGPT took no time to ponder and immediately said No. So then I asked, does white privilege exist? And without a moment to ponder, ChatGPT said, yes. Then the conversation went on and on with me asking all types of questions, and by the end of the conversation, ChatGPT couldn't keep the narrative making sense in relation to black privilege existing, haha. I might film it and put it up sometime. But just proof that ChatGPT is very leftist biased. I did a similar conversation about trans women in sports. Moral of the story, we need a ChatGPT that is not leftist.
You’re really giving Rachel a lot more credit than 20% deserves
@@MelaniaXPodcastthe problem with the AI bots like that is that if they are given false or biased information(from either side) it will act in accordance to that. Misinformation will always be a thing, especially on the internet so the solution would be to not have it at all. Trying to regulate it will only lead to bias to one side or the other.
They NEVER watch the movie, read the book; heck, they never LISTEN. Too scared to find out the truth.
"Am I racist?" is not redundant. A redundant statement would be "I'm a crazy liberal".
Nailed it in one.
For Rachel the question "Am I racist?" is redundant because everyone who is "white" is racist by definition. This is a fact, you are born with it, and can't change. From her point of view the question you should be asking is "how am I racist?" not to determine if you are racist but to identify how you are displaying it in a given situation so you can acknowledge it and apologize for it.
I don't know why, but the moment I read "I'm a crazy liberal", I immediately heard the response "why'd you say crazy twice?" in Norm MacDonald's voice.. I miss that dude and wish we still had his voice with us today.
gold
Lmao that was perfectly said 😂😅
As a black man lol I feel like only radical liberal would call Matt racist lol
They call black people racist too. It's kind of weird tbh
@@malikthebarbarian6815 are black people incapable of racism?
You're not black you're a white guy. And this trend of white guys writing "i am black and [insert conservative opinion]" is old lame and dumb
@@malikthebarbarian6815 Especially since they're the kind of people who don't think black people can be racist!
It's kinda sus tho... feels like he's trying to say there's no such thing as racism
"Redefine every word" is part of their playbook
“change words to fit myself”
It really is!!
Giving them way too much credit she’s just stupid
I'd watch that movie
COMMUNIST playbook.
If a man can identify as a woman because they feel like a woman, how come someone who is not racist is not allowed to identify as not racist?
You said it was poorly written, but to be fair she is probably Gen Z and had to use Chat GPT or Grammerly to write this.
Can't wait to watch the movie.
Me too
@@gequitaroper1531 don't you dare "me too" me
I'm in aus and my friend group my husband and my mother inlaw can't wait 😂😂😂 I'm sure there's gonna be plenty of others around the world watching too
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
100%.
"Bad Matt Walsh, not to be confused with the comedian, a.k.a good Matt Walsh"...this is supposed to pass for professional journalism these days? Someone actually got paid to write this?
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
Og Matt Walsh is indeed funnier, and likely, a better human being.
I want to know how I can get paid for writing sh💩t all day. I am doing it for free at the moment.
Sadly. Many industries are declining. Social Media and Smart Phones are ruining the new Generation. Because they can't do it in moderation. It has become an extension of their Mind and Soul. I miss the 90's/early 2000's more and more everyday.
@Darwin_is_my_copilot
Well, your name says all anyone needs to know about you. Darwin is dead. In the ground. So, there is no co-pilot and from the evidence no pilot here either.
Have you seen the movie? "NO! I would never watch this movie! But, from the title I KNOW exactly what it's about!." 🤔🤔🤡🤡💩💩
Yup, that's how you do Journalism nowadays.
Sucks for you
Yeah to show who the real racists are... The libs
Biologically speaking, there's only one race.
It's more complicated than that. For example, Europeans have an average of 4-6% Neanderthal DNA.
The human genome project confirms this.
No. That's a lie.
There are different races, we are just one species.
@@AllYouHaveToDoIsBeHonestmy boss is 100% tho
Indeed, F1
"Redundant," "Negate," "Conceit": clearly she has no idea what any of these words mean. Please, someone buy this person a dictionary.
Reminds me of a quote from Gad Saad: "Postmodernism is intellectual terrorism. Beware of those trying to impress you with confusing word salads" (The Parasitic Mind)
I think she was talking about her own article 😂
I think you can add "racist" to the words she has no idea of the meaning of. It's possible she's been told (and unquestioningly accepted) that it means "white". Or, perhaps "white male".
Would it help? Is she literate?
She used the word "conceit" correctly though. I was also baffled by it's use, but a quick dictionary search revealed that it can also be used to mean "theme" or "concept."
CLUELESS. So frickin’ clueless. Woke is an oxymoron clothed in hypocrisy, floating in a sea of cognitive dissonance
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
Nailed it
Lol the woman that wrote the article would probably read that and be like "pshhh... you're the oxymoron here bud... cause you didn't go to college 😛 I'm not the one bein all cognatively distant, I'm right here right now and aware, that's what being WOKE means, to be AWAKE, AWARE?... go be a hypocritic somewhere else i ain't got time for ur racism."
They are narcissistic sociopaths 😂
Yeah, and the internet now gives them a platform to reach millions . YIKES !
Yes, “anti-racism” should absolutely be mocked as thoroughly as possible. It’s not even anti-racism if we’re being honest. It’s just plain racism in the opposite direction masqueraded as a good noble deed when it is not.
It's not even reversed. These people believe, as a core principle, that minorities are so inferior that they can't get ahead without the persistent efforts of the "white saviors" (themselves).
It's antiwhiteism. That's it. They have a problem with one group.
That is why we're done being "nice and tolerant" and now treat them with the same kind of disrespect.
If people really want to be anti-racism, there are no bad races. All races are good/inherently good. There are people that exhibit good and bad behavior from every race.
That's what I believe, so that is how I know I'm not a racist.
The opppsite of racism is to not be racist to anyone. Anti-Racism is just being racist to a different race so it really is just racism...
Exactly. It's like how Antifa is actually fascist.
"The liberal idea of unlearning racism" means nothing when your philosophy reinforces racism by it's practice.
I’m married to a lovely lady who is non-white and together we have a wonderful biracial child. I’ve lived much of my life overseas in a small town where I was the only white person. I’m fluent in a non-European language. Yet, I was once called a racist by someone who didn’t know anything about me, simply because I was a white male who denied being a racist. “Your white, a male, and you say you aren’t a racist ... therefore you must be a racist.” 🤔
Classic double bind logical fallacy... you are the thing, and if you deny it, that just proves it.
So if you say you're a racist that means you're not?
A woke word salad review, go figure.
Of a movie that hasn’t been released lol
Word salad is how you confuse the ignorant.
Yes pyscho babble & double speak@darylfoster7944
How does a review of a movie that she hasn't even seen get published? Not surprisingly it didn't make any sense and was poorly written.
"This guy got halfway through the game and then put his review up" -Funny Donkey Man
Kids playing with crayons rarely critique other kids with crayons 😂
No one ever accused a liberal woke journalist of being intelligent.
You might be confusing a journalist with an activist. Not many real journalists left in the world.
hahaha best comment
You would end up in court for making false accusations if you did.
Unfortunately a lot of people do
If I'm only racist Against One race and there are, say, nine races, could I say that I am only 1/9 racist?
Technically speaking, there's only one human race. Skin color, hair color, eye color, body shape, etc... are are just superficial differences. differences.
@@reidveryan9414 I agree. It was sarcasm.
It's ok we are all ONE race....just different ethnicities...people are stupid.
@@reidveryan9414 Superficial? Different phenotypes also have different behaviors and hormonal profiles.
Is the only different between a pitbull and a pug the fur color and size? Time to grow up and be honest.
@@AllYouHaveToDoIsBeHonestYou’re definitely racist! You need to join a guilt group asap!
My class teacher openly insulted and humiliated me claiming I was racist but I was just singing songs I liked , some blk dudes thought I was talking abt them when I wasn't but it's still my fault 🤷🏻♂️
The lesson here is : stop listening to rap. It's pure garbage
Don't listen to that garbage
@Skippy-s1g I agree. I never liked it. Hip Hop is worse.
Accuses you of racism.
Misses the rhetorical aspect of the title.
Proceeds to label you as a "white man" in a derogatory manner.
Well, done, lady, you answered the question... though as someone who embraces "anti-racism" putting the titular query to you would, in fact, be redundant as the answer is self-evident.
I think this kind of behavior actually disproves something Matt says in the video.
The writer of the article says she's anti-racist, and I believe that she thinks that emphatically. But then she tries to discredit Matt by accusing him of being a white man. That's demonstrably racist despite the fact that she doesn't think it is.
@@redgeoblaze3752when these ideologs say anti-racist what that means to them is to " be racist in the other direction" with the argument that it's not enough to just remove systemic racism you need to place things like affirmative action to offset the racism.
So yes....they are literally racist, and when they say anti-racist they just mean they are being racist against races that have skin that is to light in color
@@redgeoblaze3752 Typically, the anti-racists have two opposing ideas:
1. A more subconscious thought that they are superior, and that's why they must help "the vulnerable". Really just means they view others as less that them, and themselves as saviors.
2. They hate themselves for the fact they are "better", and project that by insulting others who don't also agree with the first point, at least for the white ones.
At least for the whites.
For the POC anti-racists, it's the opposite:
1. They feel a sort of inferiority in this case, and if you don't validate their inferiority complex by wanting to help them, you are the bad guy.
2. Since they are inferior and the victims, that means they have the moral superiority against "the oppresor", so you have to agree with them.
All in all, both are extremely racist.
If anyone referred to me as "one of the Daily Wire cronies" publicly, that would be the moment, I knew, I was successfully making a positive impact in the world. What an awesome compliment. I'm envious of you Matt. Can't wait to support the Daily Wire and see this film!!
You are clearly one of the Daily Wire cronies. (You're welcome. 😉)
@@juddgoswick2024 Bless her heart! 🤠
@@juddgoswick2024 haha thanks!!
Also, the Mary Sue is a den of trash. They gave Madame Webb a good rating. They give literally the worst movies A good rating and often are the only one that gives them a good rating as well.
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
They have so much bias they can't even be taken seriously
Sounds as reputable as 'the root'
What’s Mary Sue
All they care about is if the film pushes the message.
When i was growing up in the 80s and 90s, the main thing people stressed about racism was that we don't focus on skin color and don't treat anyone differently because of that. Today they are teaching the complete opposite, aka: racism.
I did see a recent example of a person who doesn’t think they are racist, but sure appears to be. Sheryl Swoops said “black people can’t be racist” and “racism was furthest from her mind” when attempting to explain why she gives Caitlin Clark no credit.
I grew up in a small town in the south. We did have segregation when the town was built and do have a predominently black section of town. From the 197Os to about 15 years ago, everyone always got along, no matter what part of town. We had buried the past.
During the reign of obummer, increasingly the prejudice against whyte people is being felt. It's not us old folks, we still all get along, but the youth really becoming agressive and dangerous. They are being fed crazy ideas.
I was doing my laundry at the laundromat and 4 young women flat out told me to get on back to the whyte part of town and not ever come back !
I am old. I left. This sort of stuff never used to happen here. Their minds have been poisoned.
@@avalerie4467I remember my first time grownuping at the laundromat. I had no idea what to do so I cheated off the black person next to me and ended up setting my washing machine dial to "whites".
I had to go back to work and must have left my clothes in the "good dryer" because when I got back someone else was using it and my clothes were neatly folded on the counter. Today, I believe they would be stolen or thrown on the floor.
"You're using a thesaurus while writing this but you might want to use a dictionary too" 😂
Burn.
More like AI and spell check. Bet they don't know what a thesaurus or dictionary is. 😂
🔥🔥🔥
00:53 I think she doesn't know the difference between redundant and rhetorical
Exactly
I'd be surprised if she knew how to tie her own shoes...
She probably doesn't know the difference between male and female either.
nor what a w0m4n is.
@@98f5I’d bet the farm on that. Also doesn’t shave her pits and legs and smells like oatmeal.
Reminds me of the recent Don Lemon "man on the street" interview where a Trump supporter tells him that he "was making more money when Trump was president ". Only to have Donny tell him that he is wrong. SMH
The funniest part was the guy saying "you must watch CNN" and Lemon says, no, no I'm not watching CNN 😂
You have to disbelieve your lying eyes.
Condescension Don: "It just SEEMS that way to you..."
Don might have been right if he was talking nominal dollars. If his pay went up 10% but prices went up 20%, then in reality he was making more when Trump was President.
The incoherence is breath-taking. On the one hand, you are whatever you feel you are inside. No one else can tell you who you are. Everyone else has to respect the way you identify yourself. If anyone questions what you feel is true about yourself, they are bad, bad, bad.
Unless you believe you are not a racist. Then things get completely flipped around. How could you possibly know whether you are a racist or not? Just because you feel you are not that's supposed to make it so? How do you know you are not engaging in self deception? Since unconscious bias is objectively true, why should anyone respect your feelings on the issue?
Yes, good idea: if sb identifies as the 37th gender your answer could be: unconscious bias
I would not agree with Matt's interpretation of being racist, that he starts about 6:00 in. Matt claims that you can't be racist if you truly don't think you are. But, that's not really how racism is qualified. Racism is qualified by actions.
It's perfectly reasonable that someone can hold racist thoughts, say racist things, and do racist things and genuinely think they're not racist. We see this all the time today with the left. They literally believe they're not racist despite acting racist and saying racist things towards white people, for example.
Rachel doesn't sound like the sharpest knife in the drawer. One thing she could do is take a basic English course.
She's educated in queer studies 🤡
it could be rhetorical but not redundant
It could also be pointless, if one issues that it is self evident that Walsh is racist. That assumption would be fallacious, of course.
Thats genuis, even if libs answer that question, their answers would make no sense, so it is rhetorical.
Rachel is obviously a Caucasian Karen.
Whyte weemon coop’d woke, they are the woke.. they must be stopped
Close, but not exactly...
@@chrissavage1534 She is a big ole beautiful woman with a normal face. Don't bully.
Matt's channel is the entirely wrong place to use the name Karen as an insult, given how many times Matt's spoken up against that, interestingly enough, for being racist among other things.
She's an AI.
I'm obnoxionist - I discriminate against obnoxious people - I don't want them in my life - nice people are welcome, any group, any background, any features, any time!
While I’m here… Am I racist for asking why some people capitalize the word black when referring to black people? And if the proper thing to them is to do so, then why don’t they likewise capitalize the word white when referring to white people?
It's racist for you to notice that.
@@NONANTI 😂😂😂😂
Wow, she doesn't even get the content of the movie correctly from the trailer. How could she get it that wrong. The trailer clearly shows that it's going to be a movie, exposing all the stupidest racist ideas and racist beliefs about racism from the gatekeepers of racism themselves.
I would say Matt is a comedian. His delivery and tone are priceless
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
Anyone using the word "unpacking" is automatically a fraud.
Therapist talk
Let me unpack that 😅
I guess you unload your suitcase?
So true every syllable of that word is a red flag
Except in medicine! If you know you know.
Realistically, what they call "racism" is simply xenophobia - fear of someone who is different, either in appearance and/or culture. Like Ben Shapiro once responded, in his typical blunderbuss manner, when he said the differences between ethnic groups has nothing to do with racism and everything to do with culture.
The claim that one's denial that they are racist is proof that they are racist is like saying denial that I am a banana is proof I am a banana.
next film. Am I human?
sadly this might have to be made
Lmao
🎶🎵🎶Or are we dancers? My sign is vitol, my hands are cold, aaand I'm on my knees looking for the answer to are we human, or are we dancer🎵🎵🎶
What is a human?
Is this a dream? Would help reverse parody and reality again
That reviewer is catty as hell. If you’re going to be that condescending, at least be right 😂
Every time I Google something I get an article written by the most obnoxious turd trying to paint others an obnoxious turd and pretend to be a victim. Victims don't typically throw rocks at their enemies, they go into hiding and witness protection programs. These people are just power hungry assholes that want to identify as justified in their disgusting behavior 🤯
When you mentioned "Mary Sue" I immediately knew this would be a stupid article.
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
And there will be at least four additional articles on the website with the exact same take on the subject.
@@MrJacksspleen And no one there will have actually watched the movie.
The scene where they’re bashing white people around the dining table gives me Django vibes. I’m just waiting for the phrenology analysis
There have been a lot of lies said around this dinner table tonight...
Using words you think you understand but don't understand is a common problem with very many people.
Me: I know that I'm not racist.
Rachel: You're just ignorant of your racism, and it's up to me to tell you of your ignorance and guilt.
For a salary. You left out the critical part.
They would go insane if a priest showed up to tell them that they're a sinner and they need to repent 😂
Matt's logic is a bit faulty in his statement. Now, I do not believe Matt is racist, but his claim that if you truly think you are not racist than you are not is simply untrue.
People can be mistaken. For example, if you ask people if they are an above-average driver, far more than 50% of the people queried will say they believe they are an above average driver. Obviously, many of those people are mistaken.
Now, Matt will probably argue that being racist is subjective, so comparing it to an objective claim about driving skills is not valid. But I would counter that there are elements of racism that could be objectively measured through a well designed series of questions. (not the type of questions that crazy liberals would ask, but more like the type of questions that the author of the Bell Curve might come up with)
@@XJWill1 Yea this is correct and was looking for a comment like this. It would easily be possible for a person to hold a racist idea such as 'asians are bad drivers', whilst also believing they aren't being racist. They may (wrongly) take anecdotal information from their own lives and apply it to a different subgroup, all while believing themselves to be correct, but that would indeed be a racist belief. Unless we are using some very limited and narrow definition of what racism is, Matt's logic is certainly flawed here.
@@XJWill1Rachael is a literal example of a racist who thinks they aren't racist
My fiancé and I can’t wait to watch the new film!!! 🥰
Just remember that using the word "racist" is an antiwhite slur, and it's only making us the villain in the antiwhite narrative.
It's pretty hard to review a movie you haven't seen 😕
It's not hard at all when you're a leftist loon.
I remember when The Passion of the Christ was in the works and critics were slamming it weeks before even the pre-release screenings.
She seems up to the challenge. She's decided to write professionally when she doesn't know how to write, why then not review a movie that she hasn't seen? There's a pattern here of doing things that she isn't at all prepared for.
A white guy made a movie. Obviously it's racist. No need to watch it. I mean, judging with zero evidence is what they do
From the looks of this, it's pretty easy!
It just won't be an accurate, informative or well written one....
Her review is a perfect statement of why your film is needed. She actually validates your approach to it by the baseless judgements she makes.
Pretty sure Rachel wrote this review before even watching the movie.
I saw previews of this movie and nobody is “actively trying to be better people”. This woman thinks she knows things but she shows she knows nothing.
Didn't you know that virtue signaling makes you a better person?
I’m not racist. I’m culturist. Your skin color has nothing to do with your personality. Your culture 100% does influence your life.
I'm fond of mine,who helped make the modern world that everyone enjoys
Well said. And anyone else who enjoys it is welcome to participate and enjoy its benefits, regardless of their skin color.
@@rachelarmstrong807 not in a world of 8 billion. Were full up. Too full
Amen. I took an ethnic diversity course in college back in 2009 (don't ask) and my final paper was explaining how our ethnicity is our skeleton buy we can choose what to add to it. I went into explaining how I'm a hispanic American female but I take on different values and cultures that don't follow many stereotypes. I actually don't connect with many Hispanics for many reasons. Like you said, culture means more to me than race.
@@mills-z9kyou must be a fool, you actually believe in overpopulation.
Sounds like he author of that article has been going to the Kamala Harris school of word salad.
😂😂😂🤣🤣I cackled!
*the
Before the internet was censored and moderated to a left wing bias....I didn't think it was possible that we'd be having these discussions. I really under estimated them. Unfortunately for them the pendulum always swings.
It's too bad that Imdb took down it's comments section. Those arguments sold more movie tickets than all the money spent on advertising could ever do
Did she confuse “redundant” with “rhetorical?”
That could be.
Probably
LOL...but the spell checker said it was correct!?
Amazing, stupidity has no limits!
They never cease to amaze me. Everyday I'm more bewildered than the next.
But they're always pushing the envelope...
Hydrogen and stupidity, the two most common elements in the universe.
She probably used Chatgpt to "write" the "review"
My first thought as well, but AI would have produced better sentence structure.
2:45 Rachel just wanted to use the phrase “negates the conceit” to sound intelligent- she failed at that too
😂😂😂
Like Joey on Friends she used a thesaurus for every word 😂😂
Explaining to a woke person why they're incorrect is disturbingly like explaining anything to a child.
_'You see I have thoughts, and you can't know my thoughts...'_
Wait...there's another Matt Walsh?
Yes. Believe it or not, a lot of people share the same names
Not surprising that a writer for the "Mary Sue," cannot write.
It's the bit from Catch-22 that keeps popping up to the delight of gaslighters everywhere:
"You have flies in your eyes."
"I do not!"
"HA! The fact that you can't see the flies in your eyes only proves that you have flies in your eyes!"
One day I wish to be as big a troll as Matt Walsh
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
Sue them... They are calling you a racist...
I don't agree with the statement that you have to think you are a racist to be a racist. You tend to be aware if you actively hate a race, but even that doesn't necessarily translate into thinking you are a racist. I think the amount of leftists that are quite racist without being aware of their own racism shows this to be the case. They may openly speak against white people or talk down to non-whites as if they are lesser and still not think of themselves as being racist for treating people as lesser for being of a particular race without specifically even knowing the person.
Maybe it would be better put as, "If you don't think about race, or don't care about race...."
I agree 100%. There are countless examples of people being racist while insisting it’s impossible for them to be racist because they aren’t white.
I was really disappointed with how badly Matt responded to this article! It was like he was reacting to it on the spot and hadn't thought through what he wanted to say. Your points are valid and I agree.
Yeah. And there are stereotypes attached to race that may exist for valid reasons at times. No discussion of, "Okay, is stereotyping racism? If I don't know I'm stereotyping, but I am, does that make me racist?" That's the question I wanted his viewpoint on. But no mention of that either.
I kind of both agree and disagree. These people are racist, but they claim not to be because "its not possible to be racist against whites." That is literally what they think while simultaneously being racist. So they are totally fine with discriminating based on color, but they disagree that it is racism. Unfortunately for them, that is the actual definition of racism.
Words can mean anything when people keep changing the definitions of them. By the old school definition of racism that we all accepted as true for years, they are unabashedly racist and proud of it.
This is literally why I just gave up talking to those people. Because you literally have to go sentence by sentence correcting every stupid misconception they have just to even have a response. They just spew bs and because it’s validated they just commit
I like how secular interpretation of racism is the exact same as the Christian interpretation of original sin.
Liberals view religion as magical thinking, yet believe that races have magical skin based sins and inherent cosmic flaws based in gender.
Somewhat true but not exactly the same. Christians believe everyone is stained by original sin, liberals claim only one race can be racist.
Bless her heart.
What is this, steam of consciousness journalism?
Said with a thick southern drawl… chef’s kiss 😚
Barney Fife style..😂😂@@NursingSoldier365
NO
Am I redundant?
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
yes
Kind of hard to be redundant with three words that are not the same word.. Rachel!
The writer of the review is "Rachel Leischman"
Anyone want to guess what religion this person is?
Same as my evil president Zelensky, Soros, Jeff Epstein, Merrick (Garfinkle) Garland,
Antony Blinken etc
Still not sure?
Israel?
Harvey Weinstein?
Wake up Americans
Yo, how about, Man Hating Feminist. Trust me, when you cannot move three words are a death sentence in Canada.
I grew up in a rural, mostly white area. Very good people. They do question other cultures because of what they see in the news. People like the reviewer of Matt's movie very rapidly label them as racists simply because they do not associate with minorities on a regular basis - unintentional on their part. I know from first hand experience that these "racists" have helped people of all walks without hesitation - no matter what they look like. They have helped change flat tires, bought tanks of gas -- and more. That does not matter to the reviewer because she gets too much joy out of labeling others as racists based on some very general observations. I am pretty sure that she has never spent a few hours pulling a (minority) stranger out of a snow bank in frigid temperatures like some people I personally know.
Angry leftist: “of course racists don’t know they’re being racist!”
Normal people: “are you racist?”
Angry leftist: “NO!”
"Does she know English?" - That's a RHETORICAL question. (Not redundant.)
Smile and wave boys and girls. Smile and wave.
Matt Walsh doesn't have to make fun of or argue with these anti racist people in the documentary, they sound foolish on their own. In one clip this lady talked about how her 3yr old daughter was racist because she preferred movies with white princesses. A white three year old preferring to see a princess that looks like them is racist but a black child wanting the same is normal according to these people. That's foolish.
When I was little, Saturday morning cartoons were a thing, on good old broadcast TV. Included in the lineup was "The Harlem Globetrotters." It was about some cool guys who went on trips, had adventures, and played basketball. Make a wild guess at what I was completely unaware of.
Kids don't have any concept of race until adults like her fuck them up.
........ but a white three year old who prefers Moana is not racist but dressing-up as Moana would be racist.
I know. The "logic" these people have is ludicrous.
That's the hilarious thing, all he has to do is let them talk.
I'm blown away by these people, I mean leave your 3 year old out of it! Purely ridiculous. It's a case of 'you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't"
Matt, here’s a quick bio of Rachel: “Rachel Leishman (She/Her) is an Assistant Editor at the Mary Sue. She's been a writer professionally since 2016 but was always obsessed with movies and television and writing about them growing up.”
It's a good thing she's a (She/Her) because I was thinking of all the men named Rachel we all know and was confused for a whole New York Minute.
Trademarks: Green eyes; Crazy personality (According to IMDb)
She sounds like your typical cat-obsessed busybody whose opinion of her own talent far exceeds the reality.
@@mallorywest1535XD I am dying lol
I'm on plenty of fish, the fact she has to state her pronouns as she/her, ,I"m starting to block all Rachels on dating websites as possibly having a penis.
@@YouTubalcaine But cats are great! Crazy woke women (or men) aren't, however, whether they like cats or dogs.
I disagree that in order to be racist you have to know it.
Racism is the belief that one race is better or inferior to another.
A person could act in a racist way without realizing that it is racist.
I would argue that everyone is a little bit racist and that level of racism is normal, safe and is never going to change.
When I was standing in the line at the movies I saw a "poster" for your movie. Made me wanna see it even more.
The conceit of liberals is cowering behind self-righteous sarcasm and believing this makes them invincible.
Wow, an entire article of generic insults without a single good point or reasonable counter to anything attested in the film. Who is surprised???
Four out of five bot reviews.
The movie is cinematic awesomeness!
Matt Walsh is Winning!
LOL
2:09 Walsh: "She has the point and proceeds to lose it. She says, 'He goes about proving this point by ... asking people about being racist, which kind of negates the entire conceit of the movie.'"
3:09 Walsh responds, "You're using a thesaurus while you're writing this, but you might want to use a dictionary, too."
"I didn't watch Matt Walsh's movie, so you don't have to" that chick
"The movie that I was unable to watch to it being unavailable is horrible because of the person involved!!!" - Rachel "the Activist, not Journalist"
"The _bad_ Matt Walsh."
Contrary to what Matt says, I think that a person can believe he or she is not racist, yet they are racist. He uses the tasting of ice cream as an example. I'll go with a person who has high levels of unrealized anger for my example. If the person does not think they are an angry person that does not mean that they are not an angry person.
Good example. I wasn't on board with his line of thinking there.
A more obvious example: someone who identifies as "anti-racist".
As Matt said, a person can still lie about how they feel/think -- so it's possible that unrealized anger and unconscious racism are both just lies. Technically, the notion that unrealized anger exists is a speculation. (I tend to believe in it too but being a psych grad myself, am playing devil's advocate & pointing out that it's at least debatable b/c whether it comes from the self or from an observer, it's an unprovable claim about an internal state. All we can do with objective rigor is record behaviour and say whether it's consistent with what our theory of anger predicts.)
But I think when defining racism according to observable behaviours like
- making/promoting assumptions about people's moral character and/or privilege based on their skin tone or ethnicity;
- applying/advocating discriminatory policy based on such assumptions;
then it becomes immediately clear that self-described anti-racists are racist.
Imo, racists are probably aware of that problem -- for them, being easy to recognize as racist is a problem that mutes their desired impact; and that's presumably why they're trying to redefine the word "racism" as a pejorative label applicable only to people their (racist) prejudice compels them to seek to collectively weaken and malign.
Traditional (objectively identifiable behaviour-based) definitions do not exclude the possibility for racism being self-directed (and in theory a person could hate themselves for being born a member of a hated class, even if one's definition of racism doesn't apply. But the new (racist) "anti-racist" definition of racism requires first prejudging an individual as privileged or oppressed depending on their "race" and then checking whether the person they're (potentially) making assumptions about or treating unfairly is a member of a lower (race) class in the hierarchy of privilege / higher in oppression status. If so, then the individual in question is inherently racist and the object of the assumptions or treatment is a victim of racism. If not, this is by definition impossible.
But despite the (by definition) innate inflexibility of one's ability to be racist, the new ("anti-racist") racists apparently find it convenient to distinguish between fundamental potential (inherently probable) racism and active (behavioural) racism that can only result from inherent potential racism plus failure to pay tithes to the grievance industry priest class to obtain anti-racist instruction regarding the requisite repentence/absolution. This helps to not only prop up their racist methods for categorizing people but also ensures an income and position of moral authority above both racists and non-racists.
It sounds like a crazy new idea but they really just copied it from feminists after witnessing the exact same power play effectively executed using sex-assigned assumptions as a divider; and feminists probably either copied the idea from authoritarian religious cults, or fell into it blindly as beneficiaries of chivalrous masculinity who began to discover to their surprise and delight just how much they could shame men into sacrificing for them if they would just relentlessly present themselves as victims and represent the opposite sex as some sort of fundamentally oppressive conspiracy designed to subjugate, rather than to exalt and protect them (though the latter was always more accurate).
In the sense that men always were eager to help their own wives, sisters, mothers and daughters, it was easy for feminists to take command of western institutions as soon as problems of starvation and war were distant enough to justify the luxury of activism. Men were happy to appease. It took more time and work for grift-hopeful racial minority members and sexual deviants to cash in as victims because they lacked the chivalrous tradition and in some cases family ties with their targeted oppressor/benefactor class. So, I think they started by posing as allies to the feminism victimhood industry, then gradually used their leverage within it to promote "intersectionality" within the feminist movement. Eventually, the victim-oppressor mastering mind virus that had already flourished there found new forms and spread further as a tool for manipulating crowds and finally here we are today with the Biden/Harris administration fully embracing professional victimhood / cultural Marxism as its primary platform.
I live in Canada and I'm becoming more racist by the day
Yeah, Shane Gillis has a great joke that I think apply to most of us. Let's be honest. Most of us no matter the race will feel with this joke, but that does not make you a racist. It will make you human. Shane Gillis- Cheeseburger Racism, check it out if you missed it.
Refering to Dem0crats as racísts would be redundant.
Someone got paid to write that. Yikes.
Probably not, they'll do anything for attention 🤡