also erstens ist 2k für ein Sichtfeld nicht unbedingt viel. Selbst die "billigen" Quest 2 von Meta haben mehr pro Auge. zweitens ist das eine Aufnahmefunktion mit zusätzlichem 3D Render . Wer weiß, was da deswegen noch alles mit einfließt. Und ohne antialiasing würdest du in fast allen PC spielen mit einem Full HD Bildschirm auch "aliasing" sehen und vermutlich als Pixel wahrnehmen. There are other AR HMDs where the elements look way smoother, like the nreal, but there is more flickering going on there, since it doesn't stabilize the elements in the virtual environment as good as Hololens 2 does.
Oops didnt realize I switched languages there. first: a 2k resolution isnt all that much. Even the rather cheap Quest 2 have more per eye. second: Its a record with additional 3d rendering. The picture is mainly the same as what he sees, but its probably not exactly the same. Its rendered for another type of display at least. There is not Antialiasing used for performance reasons. If you have a 24" full HD monitor at home you'll also see quite a few pixels if you don't use antialiasing. I've used the Hololens 2 a few times in the last months and the bigger Problem ist the small FOV and the fact that its straining for the eyes, even if the Hololens is turned off, since its like 0.5 to 1.5 cm of plastic you have to see through. luckily you can just fold the display up.
Wow, Unbelievable 👌👏.
👍
круть)))
Tha's weird, Microsoft talks about 2K resolution which perfect but after watching the video even you can see Every pixel on the menu
also erstens ist 2k für ein Sichtfeld nicht unbedingt viel. Selbst die "billigen" Quest 2 von Meta haben mehr pro Auge.
zweitens ist das eine Aufnahmefunktion mit zusätzlichem 3D Render . Wer weiß, was da deswegen noch alles mit einfließt.
Und ohne antialiasing würdest du in fast allen PC spielen mit einem Full HD Bildschirm auch "aliasing" sehen und vermutlich als Pixel wahrnehmen.
There are other AR HMDs where the elements look way smoother, like the nreal, but there is more flickering going on there, since it doesn't stabilize the elements in the virtual environment as good as Hololens 2 does.
Oops didnt realize I switched languages there.
first: a 2k resolution isnt all that much. Even the rather cheap Quest 2 have more per eye.
second: Its a record with additional 3d rendering. The picture is mainly the same as what he sees, but its probably not exactly the same. Its rendered for another type of display at least.
There is not Antialiasing used for performance reasons. If you have a 24" full HD monitor at home you'll also see quite a few pixels if you don't use antialiasing.
I've used the Hololens 2 a few times in the last months and the bigger Problem ist the small FOV and the fact that its straining for the eyes, even if the Hololens is turned off, since its like 0.5 to 1.5 cm of plastic you have to see through. luckily you can just fold the display up.
@@absolutsolo2763, I've been using it since 2020. It's perfect if you are happy to waste your money.