Yes, According to the big bang theory, galaxy clusters do not MOVE away from each other in space, but they still are more faraway later because space somehow expands. No one will ever tell how this expansion of space happens. What is its expansion based on. What the expansion of space could even make possible. No one has ever seen the expanding space, and no one ever will. Space does not emit light or anything else. The expanding space cannot be studied scientifically. You cannot try to manipulate it in such a way that you would receive information that the manipulation was successful. You can only believe in its existence. Zeus made lightning somehow. somehow. The expanding space makes the light stretch somehow. What is the difference between these gods? Nothing! It is not space which expanding. Nuclei of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force which have a nature of electrons and photons which also expanding. Expanding dark lightwaves interactive with eachothers and get eachothers expanding faster same way what matter and light expanding. The new expanding light from our own galaxy cluster faster than the old expanding light from other expanding galaxy clusters. During the mutual interaction, the new expanding light accelerates the speed of the old expanding light to the same as its own, and at this point the old expanding light is stretched, i.e. cosmologically redshifted. The cosmological redshift of this light already proves it. We notice that the old light is stretched! We don't notice that space has expanded! How would we be? Space does not emit light! There is no information about the god Zeus, nor about a God called the expanding space! Just think about that! Yes, it is true, expanding space is naked emperor 🤣 The expanding stars in space were born from zillions of expanding dark matter particles / densifications that are constantly pushed out of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies. Expanding galaxies were formed from the center outwards in the early days of the rapidly expanding visible universe in space when two expanding supermassive objects moved close to each other. The separate expanding condensations of dark matter pushed through each other again and again and it caused them to expand so fast that they didn’t have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they were expanding. At this point, they began to coalesce into new expanding stars quickly without a pulling force and without the ever-curving space. I predict that with the help of the James Webb telescope, it will be discovered that the stars were born as if from nothing. But of course not out of nowhere, you know. At least it has already seen that galaxies were born very quickly in the early days of the visible universe. This supports my view of how galaxies formed! That is, massive and ready-made galaxies are observed in the very young visible universe. Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were created in their own 3D Big Bangs on the same principle. Nowadays, the so-called background radiation is the expanding light that was created when these expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were born in their own 3D big bangs quite far from each other. Over the ages, the expanding background radiations have shaped each other into equal quality as they have encountered each other, interacted and accelerated each other’s expansion and at the same time speeded up in the same proportion as matter and light have expanded in space outward into the already existing space. Expanding galaxies are large particles that convey information about an object that is quite massive and dense because it emits energy that has the character of galaxies. Of course, we cannot detect the object in question that we are moving away from. Galaxies are particles that convey information about it. There are an infinite number of similar objects in the infinite 3D space and they would always recycle the existing energy / pushing force. Millions of billions of years of scattered energy are pushing towards them at an extremely fast speed into space. The energy/pushing force pushed to the center of the objects in question is once again compressed there into extremely dense energy. In other words, there is constantly extreme pressure in the centers of these objects, which does not decrease because more energy is pushed into the center all the time, where it is compressed into extremely dense energy. The energy pushed into the center displaces the energy that was previously pushed there, and thus it is pushed away from there, and the expansion of the sector enables the dispersion / expansion of this extremely dense energy into a less dense one. Pushing away from the center of that object into this extremely dense energy absorbs energy that is being pushed towards the center of this extremely dense and massive object. In other words, only a small part can reach the centers of such extremely massive and dense objects. That is, extremely fast energy is pushed towards these extremely dense and massive objects, the speed of which has slowed down as this energy has been pushed through more new quarks expanding in space. In the context of pushing through new expanding quarks, this extremely fast energy has accelerated the expansion / dispersion of the energy in the expanding quarks in space into a larger and larger region of space. It is also absorbed into the expanding quarks according to when its speed has slowed down so much that the expanding quarks could stop it. Savorinen Jukka
Isnt this what science is all about, putting forward a hypothesis and having it checked by others then either discarding it or replacing the previous ideas with new. BUT the emphasis is on reliable checking not just some guy on you tube saying this is so!
Here's my crackpot theory: those galaxies are actually from the far future. They ran low on hydrogen, so the galactic-scale civilizations that they host transported their galaxies back in time, to the hydrogen-rich dark age, where they refuel by capturing hydrogen gas.
The sudden acceleration of the universe some +8 billion years ago is an inconsistency that is tied to the age and size of the observable universe. Universal constants in physics are location and time dependent. This means the constants are local. If universe expansion is a physical process of reality, then acceleration is not homogeneous and thus physical constants are not constant. If we cannot explain the processes inside a black hole, then if the universe is gravitational bounded, we can't explain its physical processes. Time to start over and accept what the Webb telescope is observing.
We should first try to understand why speed of light is 3 ×10^8 km/s and not some other number. Was it always the same or it increased or decreased as the time passed.
Next week they'll tell us that the Universe is OLDER AGAIN. Getting Sick of all these NEW DISCOVERIES . It's just another way of them saying, WE SCIENTISTS are USELESS and NEVER get it Right 😠😠😠
The evidence contradicts all of cosmology and a lot of the SM. They're wrong but they won't admit it. So they keep trying to make up ways to manipulate the data so the theory can still be right. This trick has stopped working.
@@davidhess6593According to the big bang theory, galaxy clusters do not MOVE away from each other in space, but they still are more faraway later because space somehow expands. No one will ever tell how this expansion of space happens. What is its expansion based on. What the expansion of space could even make possible. No one has ever seen the expanding space, and no one ever will. Space does not emit light or anything else. The expanding space cannot be studied scientifically. You cannot try to manipulate it in such a way that you would receive information that the manipulation was successful. You can only believe in its existence. Zeus made lightning somehow. somehow. The expanding space makes the light stretch somehow. What is the difference between these gods? Nothing! It is not space which expanding. Nuclei of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force which have a nature of electrons and photons which also expanding. Expanding dark lightwaves interactive with eachothers and get eachothers expanding faster same way what matter and light expanding. The new expanding light from our own galaxy cluster faster than the old expanding light from other expanding galaxy clusters. During the mutual interaction, the new expanding light accelerates the speed of the old expanding light to the same as its own, and at this point the old expanding light is stretched, i.e. cosmologically redshifted. The cosmological redshift of this light already proves it. We notice that the old light is stretched! We don't notice that space has expanded! How would we be? Space does not emit light! There is no information about the god Zeus, nor about a God called the expanding space! Just think about that! Yes, it is true, expanding space is naked emperor 🤣 The expanding stars in space were born from zillions of expanding dark matter particles / densifications that are constantly pushed out of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies. Expanding galaxies were formed from the center outwards in the early days of the rapidly expanding visible universe in space when two expanding supermassive objects moved close to each other. The separate expanding condensations of dark matter pushed through each other again and again and it caused them to expand so fast that they didn’t have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they were expanding. At this point, they began to coalesce into new expanding stars quickly without a pulling force and without the ever-curving space. I predict that with the help of the James Webb telescope, it will be discovered that the stars were born as if from nothing. But of course not out of nowhere, you know. At least it has already seen that galaxies were born very quickly in the early days of the visible universe. This supports my view of how galaxies formed! That is, massive and ready-made galaxies are observed in the very young visible universe. Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were created in their own 3D Big Bangs on the same principle. Nowadays, the so-called background radiation is the expanding light that was created when these expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were born in their own 3D big bangs quite far from each other. Over the ages, the expanding background radiations have shaped each other into equal quality as they have encountered each other, interacted and accelerated each other’s expansion and at the same time speeded up in the same proportion as matter and light have expanded in space outward into the already existing space. Expanding galaxies are large particles that convey information about an object that is quite massive and dense because it emits energy that has the character of galaxies. Of course, we cannot detect the object in question that we are moving away from. Galaxies are particles that convey information about it. There are an infinite number of similar objects in the infinite 3D space and they would always recycle the existing energy / pushing force. Millions of billions of years of scattered energy are pushing towards them at an extremely fast speed into space. The energy/pushing force pushed to the center of the objects in question is once again compressed there into extremely dense energy. In other words, there is constantly extreme pressure in the centers of these objects, which does not decrease because more energy is pushed into the center all the time, where it is compressed into extremely dense energy. The energy pushed into the center displaces the energy that was previously pushed there, and thus it is pushed away from there, and the expansion of the sector enables the dispersion / expansion of this extremely dense energy into a less dense one. Pushing away from the center of that object into this extremely dense energy absorbs energy that is being pushed towards the center of this extremely dense and massive object. In other words, only a small part can reach the centers of such extremely massive and dense objects. That is, extremely fast energy is pushed towards these extremely dense and massive objects, the speed of which has slowed down as this energy has been pushed through more new quarks expanding in space. In the context of pushing through new expanding quarks, this extremely fast energy has accelerated the expansion / dispersion of the energy in the expanding quarks in space into a larger and larger region of space. It is also absorbed into the expanding quarks according to when its speed has slowed down so much that the expanding quarks could stop it. Savorinen
The Background- whatever it is- Full Stop. Thats my whole point. Who knows WHAT it is? Or IF it is? Supposedly it shows the difference in tiny fractions of degrees in an explosion- or whatever again- that happened who really knows when? Reminds me- for example- of WW2 when Montgomery's Operation Market Garden went forward despite all kinds of intelligence that indicated the Germans had all kinds of armor & troops that Montgomery insisted did not exist. All those tanks & troops did not fit into Monty's plan, so he pushed on assuming they were not there. Result- disaster. (Though Monty blamed the debacle on the weather.) You are dead on correct by saying who knows what the background data means? Scientists base theories of what happened 14 billion years ago on this cool little map that they insist proves their theories, but it could be ANYTHING. A practical joke by a schoolboy somewhere in the universe, or another dimension, who is simply playing a video game in which we are a simulation. To me thats more likely than us saying we know the temperature in THIS spot in space was minus .01 degrees colder than THIS spot umpteen billion years ago. We have trouble predicting if it's cold enough to snow in our town tomorrow. All this data from Hubble & Webb, all these lights & explosions & pretty colored photos are frying scientists' brains. They are EONS away from pulling all this info together into a coherent theory on anything. They need to stand up & admit, "We found some interesting stuff. We invite all wild guesses as to what it might mean, because maybe just like in the tv show The Good Place, one person might be able to put it all together correctly in one wild, drug-induced flash of insight. Thats a lot more likely than us scientists figuring it out in less than 1 000 years. Or before we can travel to the stars & get a firsthand look at deep space, cause man has never traveled further than the moon. We're baffled & hve no clue." I could go on but I probly shoulda stopped back at "full stop". Maybe when we die a being made of bright light, love, & pure energy will sort it out for us. I kinda think that'll happen. Till then, Webb takes some purty pictures!
The MBR is horseshite too. There's a guy that helped create MRIs that showed it was impossible to measure at the precision asserted through the universe given all the dust, dirt, etc., e.g. _The "Cosmic" Microwave Background - Bad Science!_ by the youtuber Sky Scholar.
jeffreys5 • Before you frame something into a theory, you have to understand correctly what's the true real phenomenon. Without a strong conviction of what's out there in REALITY, you wander in scientific dogma, theoretical indoctrination and futile mathematical abstractions. Based on mathematics only, you get exactly the same erroneous epicycles on top of other erroneous epicyles, exactly like in the times of Nicolaus Copernicus. When I say something about the true real natural dynamic of the Universe, I have my ferm convictions in this domain, and I know exactly what I mean. Other ones just wander in the dark with their brains confused by useless mathematics.
As for the age of the "universe/earth", as I refer to our universe, for reasons that would take too long to explain at this time, consider the premise that I believe to be fact which premise is that our closed sphere, ever expanding, matter containing universe/earth wherein there is darkness, is encapsulated in a finite, ever stretching, insulating firmament beyond which is the infinite outer realm wherein we will find all of that as yet unaccounted for anti-matter, and wherein there is no darkness nor shadow of darkness, with this antimatter being in infinite form rather than being in an equally proportionate amount of anti-matter to the matter found in our universe/earth. Anyway, the really interesting part is to ask the question which is - "What if that encapsulating firmament, that totally surrounds our universe/earth, has a reflective inner surface which I believe is the case? It would mean that there aren't as many stars in the night sky as we currently think that there are, since a great many of these points of light would be reflections of other points of light, and maybe even reflections of reflections of points of light. Think on the lines of standing between two mirrors, with one on your left, and the other on your right which would result in the illusion of looking into infinity. This would mean that our universe/earth isn't nearly as big as we currently think that it is, and this would then mean that our universe/earth isn't as old as we currently think that it is. These are some of the aspects of my Windham Hypothesis.
Not detecting any Population 3 stars means that Arthur Eddington was wrong virtually all of modern astrophysics is based on his theories. Modern theory is a house of cards.
Even Edwin Hubble after some years wrote a letter to US Astronomical Society and reject the concept that light red shift is indication of star retrieval. "They" hide his letter. Of course the modern astrophysics is a house of cards. BB Theory is not a scientific theory, but invention of Belgium Priest. If you like to find the new physics try the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Perhaps when I reincarnate somewhere in the multiverse as a Space Force Marine, it will be far enough into the future that most of the current questions will have been answered. Fair winds and following seas to all.
They’re just gonna make something else up that fits in a “possibility”. These scientists justify their theories the way man justifies his sin. Anyone can justify something they observe. The theory that is true has never been disproven.
the original universe sub-divided like a cell division process - some new and a lot of old ones and next process yields the same with some new ones - making a universe with real old - newer ones - and even newer ones - process could have began 100s of billions even trillions of years ago !!!!!!
Look guys, In the beginning, GOD created the Heavens and the Earth. That’s the answer you’ve been looking for , for billions of years. I meant dollars.
Yeah right........ God (Your choice of which may vary) flicked his finger a poof..... the universe filled with billions of galaxies containing trillions of stars, all to make our night sky look pretty. Of course we can only see around 5,000 stars with the naked eye and a God even tore down the Tower of Babel to stop us seeing any more but that's fine.......
The created ones by The Creator.... are trying, trying, dying trying trying dying, trying dying to define the Infinite, the more they find the more they find, trying dying trying. Ignorant stupid & wonder struck they live to show others that The One Infinite Profound Eternal Unique Flawless Supreme Imperceptible Unknown Un-weighable Unconquerable Limitless Inexhaustible Indifferent Incalculable Undefined & I've run out of Words...!!!!
I ask myself how trustworthy models of scientists are. During the Corona pandemic in the Netherlands the models built by scientists where so wrong. Still the gouvernement clung on to it. Here we see the same. Scientists build are Big Bang model. The reality is far of. One could ask what the use of building a model is when so many important parameters are unknown (dark matter and energy etc.).
I have a pet theory about how supercomputers and so-called AI (really computer programs) are causing scientific stagnation. They allow you to build large models and manipulate data. They don't get you closer to the truth. They make it easier to fool humans they're observing reality.
Or… 🤔🤔🤔In the beginning GOD created the heavens and the earth. I know that for atheist, the cognitive dissonance is too painful. 😖 But, consider OCKAM’s RAZOR. The simplest explanation tends to be the correct one.
![Everything NASA Discovered with JWST's Year 2. Closest to Farthest [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wh4G1Wh79Ck/mqdefault.jpg)
👍👍
No beginning and no end.
Yes, According to the big bang theory, galaxy clusters do not MOVE away from each other in space, but they still are more faraway later because space somehow expands.
No one will ever tell how this expansion of space happens. What is its expansion based on. What the expansion of space could even make possible.
No one has ever seen the expanding space, and no one ever will. Space does not emit light or anything else.
The expanding space cannot be studied scientifically. You cannot try to manipulate it in such a way that you would receive information that the manipulation was successful.
You can only believe in its existence.
Zeus made lightning somehow. somehow.
The expanding space makes the light stretch somehow.
What is the difference between these gods?
Nothing!
It is not space which expanding.
Nuclei of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force which have a nature of electrons and photons which also expanding.
Expanding dark lightwaves interactive with eachothers and get eachothers expanding faster same way what matter and light expanding.
The new expanding light from our own galaxy cluster faster than the old expanding light from other expanding galaxy clusters.
During the mutual interaction, the new expanding light accelerates the speed of the old expanding light to the same as its own, and at this point the old expanding light is stretched, i.e. cosmologically redshifted.
The cosmological redshift of this light already proves it. We notice that the old light is stretched!
We don't notice that space has expanded!
How would we be? Space does not emit light!
There is no information about the god Zeus, nor about a God called the expanding space!
Just think about that!
Yes, it is true, expanding space is naked emperor 🤣
The expanding stars in space were born from zillions of expanding dark matter particles / densifications that are constantly pushed out of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies.
Expanding galaxies were formed from the center outwards in the early days of the rapidly expanding visible universe in space when two expanding supermassive objects moved close to each other.
The separate expanding condensations of dark matter pushed through each other again and again and it caused them to expand so fast that they didn’t have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they were expanding.
At this point, they began to coalesce into new expanding stars quickly without a pulling force and without the ever-curving space.
I predict that with the help of the James Webb telescope, it will be discovered that the stars were born as if from nothing. But of course not out of nowhere, you know.
At least it has already seen that galaxies were born very quickly in the early days of the visible universe. This supports my view of how galaxies formed!
That is, massive and ready-made galaxies are observed in the very young visible universe.
Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were created in their own 3D Big Bangs on the same principle.
Nowadays, the so-called background radiation is the expanding light that was created when these expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were born in their own 3D big bangs quite far from each other.
Over the ages, the expanding background radiations have shaped each other into equal quality as they have encountered each other, interacted and accelerated each other’s expansion and at the same time speeded up in the same proportion as matter and light have expanded in space outward into the already existing space.
Expanding galaxies are large particles that convey information about an object that is quite massive and dense because it emits energy that has the character of galaxies.
Of course, we cannot detect the object in question that we are moving away from.
Galaxies are particles that convey information about it.
There are an infinite number of similar objects in the infinite 3D space and they would always recycle the existing energy / pushing force.
Millions of billions of years of scattered energy are pushing towards them at an extremely fast speed into space.
The energy/pushing force pushed to the center of the objects in question is once again compressed there into extremely dense energy. In other words, there is constantly extreme pressure in the centers of these objects, which does not decrease because more energy is pushed into the center all the time, where it is compressed into extremely dense energy.
The energy pushed into the center displaces the energy that was previously pushed there, and thus it is pushed away from there, and the expansion of the sector enables the dispersion / expansion of this extremely dense energy into a less dense one.
Pushing away from the center of that object into this extremely dense energy absorbs energy that is being pushed towards the center of this extremely dense and massive object.
In other words, only a small part can reach the centers of such extremely massive and dense objects.
That is, extremely fast energy is pushed towards these extremely dense and massive objects, the speed of which has slowed down as this energy has been pushed through more new quarks expanding in space.
In the context of pushing through new expanding quarks, this extremely fast energy has accelerated the expansion / dispersion of the energy in the expanding quarks in space into a larger and larger region of space.
It is also absorbed into the expanding quarks according to when its speed has slowed down so much that the expanding quarks could stop it.
Savorinen Jukka
Welcome "Cloud and rain model universe"... 🙏🙏
Isnt this what science is all about, putting forward a hypothesis and having it checked by others then either discarding it or replacing the previous ideas with new. BUT the emphasis is on reliable checking not just some guy on you tube saying this is so!
Here's my crackpot theory: those galaxies are actually from the far future. They ran low on hydrogen, so the galactic-scale civilizations that they host transported their galaxies back in time, to the hydrogen-rich dark age, where they refuel by capturing hydrogen gas.
Where did all the empty space come from to start with? Time and universe is had no beginning.
@@davidcastle7212 yeah, you've got a Point, there mate
"Somewhere in our physics there are serious errors" Said Ramses II to Akhenaten, no joke man....
The sudden acceleration of the universe some +8 billion years ago is an inconsistency that is tied to the age and size of the observable universe. Universal constants in physics are location and time dependent. This means the constants are local. If universe expansion is a physical process of reality, then acceleration is not homogeneous and thus physical constants are not constant. If we cannot explain the processes inside a black hole, then if the universe is gravitational bounded, we can't explain its physical processes. Time to start over and accept what the Webb telescope is observing.
We should first try to understand why speed of light is 3 ×10^8 km/s and not some other number. Was it always the same or it increased or decreased as the time passed.
It’s a theory, I believe.
Sensationalizing science just never gets old.
Next week they'll tell us that the Universe is OLDER AGAIN. Getting Sick of all these NEW DISCOVERIES . It's just another way of them saying, WE SCIENTISTS are USELESS and NEVER get it Right 😠😠😠
When they build a bigger space telescope the cosmos age will double again to 53.4byo and so on
Maybe Fred Hoyle was right about a Steady State Universe after all.
This is Profound. 🌌 👍
Yeah, where did all our billions of dollars of research money gone, because it shows they were talking out their butts.
The expanding universe supposedly explains why the universe is seen as being older than previously thought...😂.
So why exactly is this a crisis, in cosmology or otherwise?
The evidence contradicts all of cosmology and a lot of the SM. They're wrong but they won't admit it. So they keep trying to make up ways to manipulate the data so the theory can still be right. This trick has stopped working.
The big bang never happened. The universe has been in existence forever, hard as that is to conceive of.
WRONG! The Big Bang happened, but that wasn't the beginning of the Universe. So what *was* the Big Bang? We don't have a clue!
@@davidhess6593 "We don't have a clue." That is the unscientific version of the sciency myth of the Big Bang.
@@davidhess6593they don’t know and you don’t know.
@@bodiemontana293 Correct! I'm part of the we, (in my comment from 2 days ago) who don't have a clue.
@@davidhess6593According to the big bang theory, galaxy clusters do not MOVE away from each other in space, but they still are more faraway later because space somehow expands.
No one will ever tell how this expansion of space happens. What is its expansion based on. What the expansion of space could even make possible.
No one has ever seen the expanding space, and no one ever will. Space does not emit light or anything else.
The expanding space cannot be studied scientifically. You cannot try to manipulate it in such a way that you would receive information that the manipulation was successful.
You can only believe in its existence.
Zeus made lightning somehow. somehow.
The expanding space makes the light stretch somehow.
What is the difference between these gods?
Nothing!
It is not space which expanding.
Nuclei of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force which have a nature of electrons and photons which also expanding.
Expanding dark lightwaves interactive with eachothers and get eachothers expanding faster same way what matter and light expanding.
The new expanding light from our own galaxy cluster faster than the old expanding light from other expanding galaxy clusters.
During the mutual interaction, the new expanding light accelerates the speed of the old expanding light to the same as its own, and at this point the old expanding light is stretched, i.e. cosmologically redshifted.
The cosmological redshift of this light already proves it. We notice that the old light is stretched!
We don't notice that space has expanded!
How would we be? Space does not emit light!
There is no information about the god Zeus, nor about a God called the expanding space!
Just think about that!
Yes, it is true, expanding space is naked emperor 🤣
The expanding stars in space were born from zillions of expanding dark matter particles / densifications that are constantly pushed out of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies.
Expanding galaxies were formed from the center outwards in the early days of the rapidly expanding visible universe in space when two expanding supermassive objects moved close to each other.
The separate expanding condensations of dark matter pushed through each other again and again and it caused them to expand so fast that they didn’t have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they were expanding.
At this point, they began to coalesce into new expanding stars quickly without a pulling force and without the ever-curving space.
I predict that with the help of the James Webb telescope, it will be discovered that the stars were born as if from nothing. But of course not out of nowhere, you know.
At least it has already seen that galaxies were born very quickly in the early days of the visible universe. This supports my view of how galaxies formed!
That is, massive and ready-made galaxies are observed in the very young visible universe.
Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were created in their own 3D Big Bangs on the same principle.
Nowadays, the so-called background radiation is the expanding light that was created when these expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were born in their own 3D big bangs quite far from each other.
Over the ages, the expanding background radiations have shaped each other into equal quality as they have encountered each other, interacted and accelerated each other’s expansion and at the same time speeded up in the same proportion as matter and light have expanded in space outward into the already existing space.
Expanding galaxies are large particles that convey information about an object that is quite massive and dense because it emits energy that has the character of galaxies.
Of course, we cannot detect the object in question that we are moving away from.
Galaxies are particles that convey information about it.
There are an infinite number of similar objects in the infinite 3D space and they would always recycle the existing energy / pushing force.
Millions of billions of years of scattered energy are pushing towards them at an extremely fast speed into space.
The energy/pushing force pushed to the center of the objects in question is once again compressed there into extremely dense energy. In other words, there is constantly extreme pressure in the centers of these objects, which does not decrease because more energy is pushed into the center all the time, where it is compressed into extremely dense energy.
The energy pushed into the center displaces the energy that was previously pushed there, and thus it is pushed away from there, and the expansion of the sector enables the dispersion / expansion of this extremely dense energy into a less dense one.
Pushing away from the center of that object into this extremely dense energy absorbs energy that is being pushed towards the center of this extremely dense and massive object.
In other words, only a small part can reach the centers of such extremely massive and dense objects.
That is, extremely fast energy is pushed towards these extremely dense and massive objects, the speed of which has slowed down as this energy has been pushed through more new quarks expanding in space.
In the context of pushing through new expanding quarks, this extremely fast energy has accelerated the expansion / dispersion of the energy in the expanding quarks in space into a larger and larger region of space.
It is also absorbed into the expanding quarks according to when its speed has slowed down so much that the expanding quarks could stop it.
Savorinen
Why is looking deeper and deeper into space considered looking back in time? It’s looking back in distance.
The speed of light is the correlation between time and distance.
The Microwave Background Radiation may simply be the rest of the Universe that we can't see and not an 'Echo' (watever that means) of anything !
The Background- whatever it is- Full Stop. Thats my whole point. Who knows WHAT it is? Or IF it is? Supposedly it shows the difference in tiny fractions of degrees in an explosion- or whatever again- that happened who really knows when? Reminds me- for example- of WW2 when Montgomery's Operation Market Garden went forward despite all kinds of intelligence that indicated the Germans had all kinds of armor & troops that Montgomery insisted did not exist. All those tanks & troops did not fit into Monty's plan, so he pushed on assuming they were not there. Result- disaster. (Though Monty blamed the debacle on the weather.) You are dead on correct by saying who knows what the background data means? Scientists base theories of what happened 14 billion years ago on this cool little map that they insist proves their theories, but it could be ANYTHING. A practical joke by a schoolboy somewhere in the universe, or another dimension, who is simply playing a video game in which we are a simulation. To me thats more likely than us saying we know the temperature in THIS spot in space was minus .01 degrees colder than THIS spot umpteen billion years ago. We have trouble predicting if it's cold enough to snow in our town tomorrow. All this data from Hubble & Webb, all these lights & explosions & pretty colored photos are frying scientists' brains. They are EONS away from pulling all this info together into a coherent theory on anything. They need to stand up & admit, "We found some interesting stuff. We invite all wild guesses as to what it might mean, because maybe just like in the tv show The Good Place, one person might be able to put it all together correctly in one wild, drug-induced flash of insight. Thats a lot more likely than us scientists figuring it out in less than 1 000 years. Or before we can travel to the stars & get a firsthand look at deep space, cause man has never traveled further than the moon. We're baffled & hve no clue." I could go on but I probly shoulda stopped back at "full stop". Maybe when we die a being made of bright light, love, & pure energy will sort it out for us. I kinda think that'll happen. Till then, Webb takes some purty pictures!
The MBR is horseshite too. There's a guy that helped create MRIs that showed it was impossible to measure at the precision asserted through the universe given all the dust, dirt, etc., e.g. _The "Cosmic" Microwave Background - Bad Science!_ by the youtuber Sky Scholar.
cwwiss1 • Absolutely correct.
The MBR is the previous emergent realm coming continuously and causally from micro to macro.
@@mikel4879 Nothing like speculation of a "priest" with no evidence to justify anything they say. Gratz. The Scientific Method is a thing.
jeffreys5 • Before you frame something into a theory, you have to understand correctly what's the true real phenomenon. Without a strong conviction of what's out there in REALITY, you wander in scientific dogma, theoretical indoctrination and futile mathematical abstractions.
Based on mathematics only, you get exactly the same erroneous epicycles on top of other erroneous epicyles, exactly like in the times of Nicolaus Copernicus.
When I say something about the true real natural dynamic of the Universe, I have my ferm convictions in this domain, and I know exactly what I mean.
Other ones just wander in the dark with their brains confused by useless mathematics.
As for the age of the "universe/earth", as I refer to our universe, for reasons that would take too long to explain at this time, consider the premise that I believe to be fact which premise is that our closed sphere, ever expanding, matter containing universe/earth wherein there is darkness, is encapsulated in a finite, ever stretching, insulating firmament beyond which is the infinite outer realm wherein we will find all of that as yet unaccounted for anti-matter, and wherein there is no darkness nor shadow of darkness, with this antimatter being in infinite form rather than being in an equally proportionate amount of anti-matter to the matter found in our universe/earth.
Anyway, the really interesting part is to ask the question which is - "What if that encapsulating firmament, that totally surrounds our universe/earth, has a reflective inner surface which I believe is the case? It would mean that there aren't as many stars in the night sky as we currently think that there are, since a great many of these points of light would be reflections of other points of light, and maybe even reflections of reflections of points of light. Think on the lines of standing between two mirrors, with one on your left, and the other on your right which would result in the illusion of looking into infinity. This would mean that our universe/earth isn't nearly as big as we currently think that it is, and this would then mean that our universe/earth isn't as old as we currently think that it is.
These are some of the aspects of my Windham Hypothesis.
What is the possibility that our universe was born through another universe s's black hole
Close to zero.
IMO none, because black holes can't exist.
Not detecting any Population 3 stars means that Arthur Eddington was wrong virtually all of modern astrophysics is based on his theories. Modern theory is a house of cards.
Even Edwin Hubble after some years wrote a letter to US Astronomical Society and reject the concept that light red shift is indication of star retrieval. "They" hide his letter. Of course the modern astrophysics is a house of cards. BB Theory is not a scientific theory, but invention of Belgium Priest. If you like to find the new physics try the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Of course it wasn't the beginning of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a beginning. You can't get something from nothing!
Cosmic, dude.
God made it at one time.
Perhaps when I reincarnate somewhere in the multiverse as a Space Force Marine, it will be far enough into the future that most of the current questions will have been answered.
Fair winds and following seas to all.
You're still wrong. It hasn't got an age that can be measured.
They’re just gonna make something else up that fits in a “possibility”. These scientists justify their theories the way man justifies his sin. Anyone can justify something they observe. The theory that is true has never been disproven.
the original universe sub-divided like a cell division process - some new and a lot of old ones and next process yields the same with some new ones - making a universe with real old - newer ones - and even newer ones - process could have began 100s of billions even trillions of years ago !!!!!!
Crack me up the Electric Universe is proving all the contemporary theories wrong on a daily basis.😉
Lambda CDM team ❤
What would be wrong with it remaining the same. I don't like change.
So much old content recycling in this video
same with all the youtube bs these days sadly
Look guys, In the beginning, GOD created the Heavens and the Earth. That’s the answer you’ve been looking for , for billions of years. I meant dollars.
really, you have to wonder how could some thing come from no thing?
Yeah right........
God (Your choice of which may vary) flicked his finger a poof..... the universe filled with billions of galaxies containing trillions of stars, all to make our night sky look pretty.
Of course we can only see around 5,000 stars with the naked eye and a God even tore down the Tower of Babel to stop us seeing any more but that's fine.......
It was only a theory but adopted as a religion by the so called scientific world. As much evidence as for the immaculate conception
Astronomy is observational science without experimentations. Interpretations are very imaginative but always wrong.
The created ones by The Creator.... are trying, trying, dying trying trying dying, trying dying to define the Infinite, the more they find the more they find, trying dying trying. Ignorant stupid & wonder struck they live to show others that The One Infinite Profound Eternal Unique Flawless Supreme Imperceptible Unknown Un-weighable Unconquerable Limitless Inexhaustible Indifferent Incalculable Undefined & I've run out of Words...!!!!
wtf?
I ask myself how trustworthy models of scientists are.
During the Corona pandemic in the Netherlands the models built by scientists where so wrong. Still the gouvernement clung on to it.
Here we see the same. Scientists build are Big Bang model. The reality is far of. One could ask what the use of building a model is when so many important parameters are unknown (dark matter and energy etc.).
I have a pet theory about how supercomputers and so-called AI (really computer programs) are causing scientific stagnation. They allow you to build large models and manipulate data. They don't get you closer to the truth. They make it easier to fool humans they're observing reality.
It is not easy for you to explain everything out of nothing. Keep trying.
Or… 🤔🤔🤔In the beginning GOD created the heavens and the earth. I know that for atheist, the cognitive dissonance is too painful. 😖 But, consider OCKAM’s RAZOR. The simplest explanation tends to be the correct one.