Except in the comments sections. This channel attracted the stinky necromorphs pretty quickly. I like the mix of polite fans asking for a new video idea, next to the toxic stuff.
Flak things blacks invented Clothes dryer Electric lamps Gas heating furnace Gas mask Home security system Lawn mower Lawn sprinkler Mailbox Modern locks Modern toilets Pacemaker Super soaker water gun lol Thermostat and temperature control Traffic lights America first clock Automatic gearshift Blimps Blood banks I can go on and on and also stolen inventions
@@VarietyGamerChannel except they had empires and advanced mathematics with medicine while your people were banging animals or incestuous sex not believing in baths..yeah sure
RUclips is full of garbage, most of the videos are really senseless bullshit, just time waste.. This is one of the rare channels which really rocks, just discovered it. Keep it up man, awesome videos, awesome topics and your knowledge is very respectable. Unfortunately I don't have too much time on my hands to watch videos but will try it hard to watch all of your videos asap :) Cheers!!
Interesting perspective. I liked how each ethno-racial groups were all explained rather than focusing on a region that was done on the last video. Keep up the good work.
Correction: armenians and Georgians are not Turkic peoples, they are indo Europeans, so it would have been far more appropriate to lump them in with the Iranians and Kurds.
@Di Vepets Genetically speaking Caucasians and Iranians are similar to Semites as they have been neighbors and exchanged genes for thousands of years. Just because they speak different languages doesn't mean they aren't genetically similar. Caucasians and Iranians share far more genes with Semites than they do with Europeans, people get way too hung up on language families instead of genetics.
Check out "history of the world" from Ollie Bye. He mapped the dawn of homo sapiens, to the dawn of every civilization, all the way to every nation in the present. It's not exactly an ethno racial map, but you can kinda figure it out just with the countries.
Interesting that you counted middle-east as a separate group from European. I always assumed a lot of the people living around the Mediterranean share a high percentage of DNA and physically they also look very similar to each other.
Martin Arbaiza: There are so many Galicians here in South America... My father is one of them. What about me?Am I Galician or mixed race (with portuguese, afro, indiginous)?
I don't know if you've seen it masaman, but another youtuber made a language map of the wolrd. You could lay it over your racial map of the world and it would match up almost 100%, I thought that was very interesting
Watched it last night. Interesting movie. Couple of question marks: Why did they use South African Black English? English accents vary greatly in Africa itself, with the biggest disparities obviously between the largely French north and more English south, although local languages also cause plenty of interference. English speakers in central Africa have a completely different accent to those in the south (nothing racist in my observation - accents do naturally vary by location) I just wonder why they used a southern accent for central Africa? I also wonder why they used a white South African as a "baddie"? Apartheid ended in 1994. The soldiers who fought for that government are presently in their 50s and 60s. The white population has dropped from around 20% of the total under Apartheid to 8% of the total today and continues to shrink. They are an oppressed minority living under discriminatory laws. Why does Hollywood persist in casting white South Africans in this light? Elon Musk is a white South African!
That's because the majority of the people who are decent human beings either don't comment or are overshadowed by the loud idiotic, ignorant minority that spout utter nonsense.
Elias Frahat They are brainwashed by turkish propoganda azeri turks of iran make up only 16 percent of iran's population. in my opinion turks are getting brainwashed in the worst possible way. they are taught to be proud of any little stupid thing. like what you just said. they keep repeating that 40 percent of iran's population is turkic and they are proud of it. (the actual number is 20 percent btw) and i as an iranian am always like: so what? 30 percent of turkey's population is kurdish too, does it even matter?
let us I hate the way turks stole the "turan" name from shahnameh and call themselves turanian although the connection between turks and turan is debunked.
Do a video on greater Tibet, about the people of Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nepal, and Bhutan. It is a fascinating and often overlooked part of the world.
Congrats on 100k subs, Mason!....I've been here since your video about Indian ethnicity....You should do a video on your ethnicity BTW.....Also I feel that this video should have been named just 'Ethnic census of the world'
Thanks for your work, Masaman. Another great RUclips channel is CaspianReport if anyone is interested in geopolitics. And there's also the GeographyNow! channel.
Living in China for the past couple of years, I say it's pretty obvious that the "Sinitic" group is more of a spectrum which varies from the Mongolian/Manchu/Korean looking northerners to "Chinese" in the central plains, to more Viet/Thai looking southerners. Most speak a variety of Chinese but they look pretty different.
Any guess as to the likelihood that interbreeding will ever result in a breakdown of the concept of racial grouping? Or will we always just evolve new racial groups?
Killer Dude Criminy bud, don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel. I didn't say anything about creating new races, just new racial groupings. I was thinking about the groups he talked about whose ancestry is a mix of ethno-racial peoples from different parts of the world. If my terminology was bad, I'll let Masaman correct me.
Pat Mila Thanks for an actual answer to my question. I suppose I was asking for crystal ball gazing. I do wish I could be alive though, to see the new races, and even the new species that will develop when humankind moves off the earth. I'm a fairly old guy with some knowledge of genetics but no real background in anthropology or archeology. The topics really are interesting. I just recently found this channel, and the videos are fascinating. However, I am beginning to see a really unfortunate negative that seems to come with the territory. I ask an innocent question, and I've already received one response from a guy who is obviously outraged over something, and another from a clear fanatic. I thought the use of "miscegenation" died with the Third Reich. My daughter is majoring in anthropology in college, and i just hope she isn't going to have to deal with these people for the rest of her life.
Feminazi frequency Maybe, but it doesn't seem to fit what I observe. I certainly agree that we will always be tribal, and will mingle with those most "like us". But what does "like us" mean? When I meet a new person, their physical appearance is the first thing I notice, and color may be the easiest thing to notice about their appearance. But if I'm attracted to a woman, by the time I'm thinking about looking for a ring I know whether she and I have similar values, similar interests, similar educational levels and similar senses of humor, and those factors are really much more important than her skin color. Her skin color is extremely important if marriage will get both of us disowned by our families and abandoned by our friends, but that just doesn't seem to happen any more. In the early '80s I hired a black physician as an expert witness in a case I was working (I'm a lawyer), and his wife was white. He told me about the hostility both he and his wife experienced with their respective families and old friends. I meet interracial couples today, and nobody gives a damn. If one of my children married an African American or Asiatic person, it wouldn't bother me at all. If they married a low life criminal, I'd be extremely disappointed regardless of the bum's race. In Europe, differences in skin color seem to mean even less than they do to millennial Americans. I look at the animal world, and animal groups gather not based on unimportant genetic variances, but on familial closeness of group members. That also happens with humans, and that's the part I hope never changes.
I believe the first statement is right. In Latin America everybody is so mixed that we dont care about race anymore, and census dont even ask about race or ethnicity. If interbeeding becomes a huge phenomenon as it was in the colonial era in Latin America I'm sure that the concept of race will eventually become void. But no one can assure whats going to happen.
This is very well made, which is why i think you should have went into deeper description in this video... its pretty cursory and you could have bothered to add some details and specifics for every group
I stumbled upon this video because I was curious what the racial breakdown of the world population was and was surprised how difficult it was to find an answer.
Hello Masaman The Negrito Population of peninsular malay only number around 4-5 thousand. You may changed something up a little bit because the other indigenous tribes of the peninsula are not negrito so the area which the negrito inhabite in the peninsula is much smaller
I'm creating folders in Pinterest with the various ethnics of the world. I was having some issues with the number of folders and their nomenclatures, so thank you for this video. Your taste for classifying people is close to my passion as a future anthropologist :)
It appears to me that the "mixed race" segment of the human population is set to become a majority. Especially in certain areas of the world. I think that more people are of mixed ancestry than they might think. An example would be in the early 1800's in the USA. If you looked white and had to fill out the census you would select white if you could. The reasons are obvious. A self example: My last name is Celtic, but during the Civil War, the actual paternal line was Norman French. My ancestor was abandoned by the paternal person and a Celtic veteran married her and raised my direct paternal ancestor. In my genetics breakdown there is a large Mediterranean percentage, which was very obvious in the olive complexion and black hair on my maternal side. But they had no idea of that, and they thought it came from our cousins on the Cherokee reservation. I also have a large genetic percentage of West Asian. Also no idea how that came to be. Odd thing is that I look like a Scottish/Irish person. My genetics say I am about 40% northern European. I think as time goes on, the appearance will be less important than in how you self identify and live your life. NOTE: Please do not be offended if I do not respond to any comments on what I have wrote. There are far too many folks using the internet to demonstrate just how ignorant and hateful they can be. To quote one person that commented on a reasoned personal opinion: "if you had a brain". What a complete waste of time. Trying to dig thru the garbage to find reasoned courteous comments, and perhaps respond, is just too difficult for me. It is tiresome. I find it very sad. Take it easy all.
You can check it in this short video (it's in Spain): ruclips.net/video/GQhpn4gXsOo/видео.html (the girls at 0:33 and 1:25 are of Latin American origins, they don't count).
Hi Masaman! big fan of your channel, learned so much about other people around the world and history of the past too, just wondering have you did your DNA ancestry? Please share if you did on your video...
Masaman, there is NO Latin American racial group. The population of Latin America is 60 percent European, 20 percent mestizo/ castizo/ pardo, (in that order), 12 percent African/mulato, 7 percent is Native American or indigenous (mostly from Mexico, Guatemala, Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador). And Asians constitute approximately 1 percent of the population. The term Latin America only refers to francophone, luso phone, or Hispano phone countries of the American Continent or continents. Hence, Surinam, Guyana, and the anglophone islands of the Caribbean should not be included within Latin America. Also the term Latino is a US created term to identify people of Latin American heritage living within the borders of the US just like Hispanic. The English term for people who live in Latin America is Latin American. By contrast, in Spanish the term may be Latino Americano or just Latino. But not in English.
Max Cruz you are way off on your affirmation. Most Argentines are of European stock. Most Mexicans are mestizos or castizos-European, Native American. A majority of Brazilians are of European stock. So, is Gisele Bündchen African, indigenous, or a moor? How about Lío Messi or Pope Francis? African, indigenous, or a moor? How about Guillermo Del Toro? African? Indigenous? A moor??? To begin with, the moorish component of Spaniards is about 2 to 8 percent and found only in about 2 percent of the population of Spain. The amount of African slaves to Argentina and Mexico was very minimal, unlike Brazil and the Caribbean. For example, why would Mexico require a big number of slaves, if they had the “encomienda de Indios”???
mexico is mostly indigenous aztec or mayan (90%) some african (9.9) and moor (.1) latinos have no white (anglo, scandinavian, dutch, etc.) they're facts. get over it.
Congratu-f**king-lations lad. Tis a fine work that needed to be done, specially for Latin America. This is how we will overcome racism, thought realism. You can consider this video and the last one your Magnus Opus so far. Thank you
The masses are always stupid, hence why we need a meritocracy to prevent stupid people and leeches from gaining power, draining our resources and controlling our society.
I am a white person who is concerned about the demographic changes immigration is causing in Europe, but a lot of white nationalists really irritate me. They don't acknowledge that it was our race that created much of the multiculturalism that they hate so much in the world today. It was created during the colonial period. Why do you guys think it is okay to dilute the genes of natives around the world but you get upset that it is now happening to our race? I would support your views more as a white person if you didn't follow this hypocrisy. You guys get upset that Latin America isn't majority white or that whites are becoming a tiny minority in South Africa. I don't support the violence against whites in South Africa and I hope they get out safely, but our colonial ancestors should have known this day would come. I see people here commenting on how whites don't have enough land. Have you seen the map? You guys make me sick. Let's focus on preserving Europe. If Europeans would have always done that we wouldn't be in this mess.
I am a black person who is also concerned about the demographic changes in Europe and most white-nationalist also disgust me not in the way they seek to preserve European culture and genetics but the fact that the solution to these demographic changes in Europe will be through some sort "peaceful ethnic cleansing". Some realize how stupid that sounds and feel that forceful deportation of non-whites in Europe will be the answer and some fully admit it will result in a race war. This is why I despise some people in the Alt-Right except people like Jean Francois Gariepy, Braving Ruin and a few others. As there are many solutions to solve this problem but they choose the most psychopathic and destructive way to solve these problems. I am not surprised though, as, with that kind of movement, you're bound to attract people who innately hate other races and lack no empathy. As a few people in that movement genuinely wants to eradicate sub-saharans who inhabits Africa as they see them as a waste of space and resources.
Racial differences across the planet are interesting, but I think it's even more interesting the ways these different groups live and intermingle within urban areas around the world
Ashkenazi Jews were NOT "so heavily integrated into European populations" from a genetic standpoint. They have about 15% Northern/Eastern European ancestry, with the rest being Middle Eastern and Mediterranean. Culturally, it was more complex, but for the most part they were a distinct ethnic group with explicit Middle Eastern roots. Classifying "Jews" as a distinct group is completely appropriate seeing as the vast majority of modern Jews fall within a genetic continuum from the Eastern Mediterranean into West Asia, they have historically shared a common ethnic/ancestral identity, common language (Hebrew), common religion (which encompasses every aspect of life), and today share a common land (almost half live there and the majority feel a direct cultural/ethnic connection to it). Also, southern Slavs are genetically totally distinct from northern Slavs. Romanians are genetically mixed with Italic influences, but either way Bulgarians and Serbs genetically fall closer to Greeks than they do to Poles. Linguistics is NOT a 1-1 indicator of ancestry.
He said that at the beginning of the video that geographically close groups have often more in common than language family groups but theres no way you can present something like that on a map. You are right I myself am a pole and i have never met a bulgarian or serbian that looks polish to me. As for askhenazi i read somewhere that they maintained only 20% of the semit genes. However, the rate of intermerriage between them and spehadric is so high that soon all israeli jews will be mixed except for hasidic.
Crikey mate you do love your stats & graphs. Well done very interesting. Just trying to work out which piece of the pie graph my daughter & nieces drop into? Irish/Chinese/Anglo Saxon Dad. Filipina Mum. My brother's girls their Mum is Egytian/Anglo Saxon decent. 😃
Love your research and videos! Just wanted to say if you add up the nations that are Caucasian or mostly Caucasian then it's close to a tie between Caucasian's and East Asians.So if you take your stats in this video of the Caucasian nations which are North West Eurasian Peoples+Southwest Eurasian Peoples+Southern Eurasians Peoples, but of the latter group only adding the Indo-Ayrans as the group that is mostly of Caucasian descent, then you have a population that equals Asia East. Note also you haven't added people in Latin America who are mostly of European descent to this mix. Okay love your work!
Killer Dude Actually I am. Did my dna ancestry test and Im fully European. So if you dont know, please dont speak The wave of inmigrants that came to my country (Uruguay) are from the last century, not when the spanish came...
Killer Dude Ill say it, but before that let me tell you that by stating that there are no pure whites in south america just shows your ignorance...You should watch massaman videos on Argentina Uruguay and south Brazil. And yes, I am 41% Iberia, 28% Italy/Greece, 20% Ireland, 6% England, 1% West Europe 1% Scandinavia 2% European east. May I pass you a link showing you this results too?? This is hella dumb
Killer Dude Well but by being south european it doesnt make you less "european". And Im not greek thou, I know Im Italian because of my grandad. Dna ancestry (The test I made) shows you the percentage you have of blood by region, its pretty general thats why it says Italy/Greece in a general way but despite that I know its refering only to Italy. I mean, its obvious that I will not be fully Spanish, or fully German, even white people in America arent so!. But 100% European, I dont doubt it.
Killer Dude And yes, a lot of countries in europe are not taking care of their borders, they should preserve their identity, but after ww2 we all know globalists seized control over europe...
Rodrigo Pfeiff Galf your part of the crew! I’m 99.8% make up of Scandinavian so I’m counted as a pure European. (97% up is counted as pure by analysts). Any white person is welcome here.
Are Mongolians counted as Altaic and considered Northeast Eurasian? And what are Turkic groups such as Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Tatars, etc. counted as? Depending on where they live and what their appearance is they could fall under Northeast Eurasian, Northwest Eurasian or Southwest Eurasian. Do they just fall under their own geographic category of Central Asian?
First of all: Altaic is a langauge term like indo european and doesnt have anything to do with race. Also mongolians are northeast asian + central asians. Turkic people are also north east asians + central asians + Eurasians. Central asian is only geographic term. In terms of race turkic people are north east asian + eurasians. Mongolians are mostly north east asians + a little bit eurasians.
Oh my god, i'm so happy someone finally mentioned the Slavic genetic situation surrounding Hungarians and Romanians. Many foreigners who consider language to be the determinant for one's ethnic background would easily mix Hungarians as an Uralic ethnic group and Romanians as a sub-Italic type of a nation but in reality these peoples don't differe much from their neighbors, which is totally fine and not racist to mention. Through times Hungarians have mixed with their neighbouring Austrians and Slavs that in the end they've eventually became a Germano-Slavic ethnic group with a very little Uralic/Turkic genetic background, some researches state no more that 1-3% (the only difference regarding genetic background in this case would be within Szekely Hungarians who've been living isolated in central parts of Romania with up to 7% of their Asiatic genes, which is still too insignificant for Hungarians to br labeled as "Asiatic/Uralic/Mongolic people). As for the Romanians, proto-Romanians were called Dachians and Thracians by the Greeks and were a Balkanic/Dinaric peoples who heavily mixed with Slavs and other Indo-Iranian peoples who've invaded Eastern European basins stretching all across the southern parts of modern-day Ukraine, Moldova and most of Romania. In the period of the Crusades, they've got some Western European genes via marriage/reproduction with Italic and Germanic peoples, which makes up to about 20% of their modern dna. Still, Romanians could easily be labeled as Balkano-Slavic peoples. In fact, South Slavs have less Slavic genetical background than Hungarians and Romanians, and most of the ex-Yugoslav peoples have no more than 15-20% of Slavic blood, the best example would be Montenegrins with no more than 7% of Slavic genes, eventhough they speak a Slavic language, having been exposed to the Slavic culture and tradition for a long period of time. Language partially determines one's ethnic background but in most of cases the situation is much more complex considering years of intermixing between many people through occupations, invasions, slavery, intermarriage and so on.
"Latin American" should be a racial category in your map. We do not see ourselves as black or white or whatever, as those are Anglo racial categories and in no way connected to our identity. We see ourselves as "Latino" and that's it. Even then, a sense of shared "Latino" identity isn't very strong, but it hits closer to home than classifying us as "Mestizo", "Black", or "White". These concepts of racial identity are rather foreign to us.
i don´t think so,i´m argentinian and I'm sure I have European ancestry. although lately Argentina is becoming little by little more mestiza by bordering immigration. Uruguay could be de same
Latino is pretty much a racial category at this point. In the vast majority of cases (easily over 90%), Latinos are some sort of mix between Mediterranean Europeans and Native Americans, with a bit of Black admixture depending on the region. It's like saying Europeans are not a race, and instead you divide them between Middle Eastern farmers and Indo-European nomads. It's goofy. Latin Americans are a race, with gradual degrees of Native American and Mediterranean ancestry. Same as Europeans, that also happen to be a race formed by different peoples in the distant past. In short, Latino or Latin American is very much a racial category. Being nit-picky because of some German living in Southern Brazil is pretty damn autistic.
Feminazi, congratulations on talking to socially marginalized people on the internet, largely influenced by American imageboard culture. No, I am sorry to inform you that White Brazilians and White Argentinians do not have separate identities from your average "mixed-race" individual that lives in any of those countries. Plain and simple, it's not true. Swarthy Argentinians are just as cocky and pretentious for being Argentinian, as those of 100% Italian descent. Neither of these groups see themselves as being anything other than Argentinian, and neither of these people would even put each other's "Argentinianness" into question. I am glad that race is an important aspect of your identity, but race in the Anglo context is not really a thing for us. That is all you need to understand.
krieg9 No... Latin America is only 60% Mestizo, not 90% get your facts straight. Didn't you see the video? And while Latinos may not see race, this is not accurate... Take for example Hugo Chávez and Nicolas Maduro. Both Latinos from the same country who probably see eachother as the same race. But anyone with an eyesight can tell that they're clearly not. One is afro Latino and the other one is a Mestizo ... Take for example Mauricio Macri, Enrique Peña nieto and Evo Morales, they are all "latinos" but none of them are the same race. One is white, the other one is Mestizo, the other one is native... The only one who is probably aware that he's of a different race is Evo due to being raise in a different culture (He's ethnically Aymara so his culture is different from that of a regular Latino)
Good vid I'm sorry to I contribute to the war like conversations and arguments on your vids I'm not proud of it it's hard for me . I appreciate your work and apologize for making some comments not to the best interest of us as human beings.
Common Zenoric What the media brands as "white supremacy" is simply white people's desire to live around each other undisturbed. It's something everyone on Earth wants. It's only bad when Europeans do it, though.
When Christopher C. Arrieve to America he believed he was in the India, those the term amerindian to native americans, please dont use that term cause its just wrong, native americans are relative to the mongolid race not the indians.
Mason, at 2:03 you also coloured in Moldova, but you didn't mention the Moldovans... NOT a critisizm, just a point. I'm not offended, I'm American, but some Moldovan might call you out on it; but probably not... 💛&✌
I am from USA I have Hispanic heritage all my living family except for my close cousins uncles and graparents live in the USA but when the census was token I was in Mexico
Kurdish Aryan Median Hurrian Hittite as a kurd it's very disrespectful to be racist to other ethnicities and races or else no will like us and won't give us land
Hoi19448239345 lol the only reason why the Christians are in the kurdish region is to keep away from the arabs and you don't know shit about iraq Btw if hating on Islam isn't racist then why is hating on Christianity racist?
Spooky Noodle our issue that kurds want to repopulate the Christian areas and arab/turkmen areas with kurds in a non peaceful way and add it to kurdistan that why we send the army to kurdistan
Great information. I'm trying to understand your statistics on people of African origin. Does it include African Americans? I'm curious since you separated Afro Latinos into their own statistical group. AA's don't fit into that category, so I wanted clarification on whether AA's were absorbed into the African statistical group.
Thanks for the reply. For clarification, yes, AA's are obviously of African descent. My question was whether they were placed under the statistical umbrella of the Afro latinos and Afro carribeans or whether they fall under the general category of Africa.
Lalia3131 his grouping is not law nor infallible... make ur own chart don’t follow his. It is obviously biased...he separates Africa n Asia but lumps all of Europe together ...that should be the first clue that he cannot be trusted
Because African American are KNOWN to identify themselves as black. It's fine if you don't but most people I've met in America call themselves black. Also he's half black.
I think you are about the only one who talks about these topics without any dubious rasist claims
Except in the comments sections. This channel attracted the stinky necromorphs pretty quickly. I like the mix of polite fans asking for a new video idea, next to the toxic stuff.
@@VarietyGamerChannel hold on blacks make some of the best empires in history like the Mali empire which held the richest man in the world.
Flak things blacks invented
Clothes dryer
Electric lamps
Gas heating furnace
Gas mask
Home security system
Lawn mower
Lawn sprinkler
Mailbox
Modern locks
Modern toilets
Pacemaker
Super soaker water gun lol
Thermostat and temperature control
Traffic lights
America first clock
Automatic gearshift
Blimps
Blood banks
I can go on and on and also stolen inventions
@@VarietyGamerChannel except they had empires and advanced mathematics with medicine while your people were banging animals or incestuous sex not believing in baths..yeah sure
@@VarietyGamerChannel That's a pretty white centrinc view of the world...
RUclips is full of garbage, most of the videos are really senseless bullshit, just time waste.. This is one of the rare channels which really rocks, just discovered it. Keep it up man, awesome videos, awesome topics and your knowledge is very respectable. Unfortunately I don't have too much time on my hands to watch videos but will try it hard to watch all of your videos asap :)
Cheers!!
Oh wow, a really educational and unbiased video on ethnicity and race! I'm sure the comments will be just as objective too! Oh wait...
Muddy Skies Earth is round????
The indo iranian and han Chinese are a bit exaggerated in my opinion
@Karl Wytoldus Janis de Voorsbergh To bad for you born on the wrong planet.
Omg Chuu
Can you do an in depth look at the racial and ethnic minorities of the Russian Federation
Here it is it’s 100% Russian white
Great idea! Very diverse!
jose juarez lol no 20% of russias population is muslim and other are mixed with mongols
vovka but doesn’t it still have a large white population
jose juarez it does but that white population is mixed with mongols
Interesting perspective. I liked how each ethno-racial groups were all explained rather than focusing on a region that was done on the last video. Keep up the good work.
I've learned more from your channel than I ever did in school history class.keep up the kick ass research.
These videos always attracts the very best kind of people...
As someone who got their degree in anthropology, I appreciate your love for documenting and looking at statistics of groups.
Correction: armenians and Georgians are not Turkic peoples, they are indo Europeans, so it would have been far more appropriate to lump them in with the Iranians and Kurds.
Alex Guzelian he classified them as Caucasians
Adiyar Zharmenov must have misheard
Caucasians as from the Caucas. Not caucasins as white people. He explained that on past videos
Georgians don't speak an Indo-European language, they speak a Kartvelian language.
@Di Vepets Genetically speaking Caucasians and Iranians are similar to Semites as they have been neighbors and exchanged genes for thousands of years. Just because they speak different languages doesn't mean they aren't genetically similar. Caucasians and Iranians share far more genes with Semites than they do with Europeans, people get way too hung up on language families instead of genetics.
I’m still very new here, but I already love this channel. This was great, and believe it or not, actually really very useful to me. ✌🏼
I can’t wait for your book to come out. Very well researched and explained. Great 👍!
Congratulations for the 103k subs I was here from the begin love your videos mason hope you reach 150k before the end of this year
abcde fghij I have many requests :/
His vids rock eh! Such great concepts!
Stop spamming please.
Tulpar Kül Tigin Tengrikut ok I will just make two comments per video
I love this channel omg subbed, I’m a freshman and I’m taking AP human geo and I am very interested in this subject
I absolutely love you're channel and you inspire me to be a geo political professor
Wow! What a great and complete video; so educational, thought-provoking, and fascinating (Mr Spock!)!!!
I find your videos and the comments about them quite educational and entertaining as well. Keep up the good work Masaman.
Now make an ethno-racial map but for every year since 200,000 B.C. ;)
Check out "history of the world" from Ollie Bye. He mapped the dawn of homo sapiens, to the dawn of every civilization, all the way to every nation in the present.
It's not exactly an ethno racial map, but you can kinda figure it out just with the countries.
ArvidiusMC it might take him 200,000 to complete
Yeah, then count every sand grain in the world!
Interesting that you counted middle-east as a separate group from European. I always assumed a lot of the people living around the Mediterranean share a high percentage of DNA and physically they also look very similar to each other.
@Masaman , You should do a Filipino v. Pacific Islander video. Similarities and Differences. Just an idea lol. Good work w the videos man!
or even more broad, like South East Asia v. Oceania with the same concept?
I remember when you only had 7k subscribers. Keep up the good work!
Amazing work! Keep it up
Your videos are great just keep doing your thing 🤙🏽
I'm over 70% European but not yet white. I count as a pardo in Brazil.
Eso es ser casitzo y cuenta como blanco, solo que no full blanco tipo palido.
@Alyson Loubet yes i know, but they can undestand spanish.
@Alyson Loubet Spanish Portuguese are very similar when writing, when speaking it is more complicated, also with French and Italian
Pardo is a race that only exits here.
@ Mostly of us don't Kkkkkkkk
Poor Amerindians :’(
We're coming back :)
@@xochitlilhuicatl1573 and I'm planing a campaña del desierto 2.0 baby 😌
Xochitl Ilhuicatl well.. things have to go as planned as well as a native run nation..
Do one on the basque people
Here a descendant of Basques, also claim a video of them. And if you can of the Galicians.
maxytleten *basque?
American Spartan thank you I thought in english it was with v
maxytleten no problem
Martin Arbaiza: There are so many Galicians here in South America... My father is one of them. What about me?Am I Galician or mixed race (with portuguese, afro, indiginous)?
I don't know if you've seen it masaman, but another youtuber made a language map of the wolrd. You could lay it over your racial map of the world and it would match up almost 100%, I thought that was very interesting
mister e which youtuber was it?
Care to share the link
ruclips.net/video/17a8eSA2ku0/видео.html
Ben McKean there's no such thing as iq map
Ben McKean I was talking about the last one nobody has measured the averse iq of every country in the world
Amerindians: *exist*
Diseases: I'm gonna destroy this man's whole career
10:09 What do you mean by "Latino"? Southern Europeans?
All I want to know is wheres wakanda located at?
ruclips.net/video/72r_guh_Ckc/видео.html
Watched it last night. Interesting movie. Couple of question marks: Why did they use South African Black English? English accents vary greatly in Africa itself, with the biggest disparities obviously between the largely French north and more English south, although local languages also cause plenty of interference. English speakers in central Africa have a completely different accent to those in the south (nothing racist in my observation - accents do naturally vary by location) I just wonder why they used a southern accent for central Africa?
I also wonder why they used a white South African as a "baddie"? Apartheid ended in 1994. The soldiers who fought for that government are presently in their 50s and 60s. The white population has dropped from around 20% of the total under Apartheid to 8% of the total today and continues to shrink. They are an oppressed minority living under discriminatory laws. Why does Hollywood persist in casting white South Africans in this light? Elon Musk is a white South African!
Wakanda question is that?
location is your imagination.
I went there in my gap year to teach English, but everyone spoke it already lol.
Great video Masaman!
What happened to carthgians please this my 8th request
Definitely looking into it! We will return to our regular videos soon. These videos were just for the 100K special.
Masaman thank you mason
Elias Frahat Elias you're literally everywhere, welak let me see a video without scrolling down and see your comment khooya.
Kevin M yes
ARHN I Iike to do requests
So many negative vibes in this comment section... Some people really do have to much free time.
Dewey Dezimal
To make comments.. ironic
That's because the majority of the people who are decent human beings either don't comment or are overshadowed by the loud idiotic, ignorant minority that spout utter nonsense.
This is why RUclips needs to bring back the dislike button
Smeetheens Definitely. Everbody who comments should be able to handle good and bad responds.
Smeetheens There's a thumbs down button for comments you can press. Did it actually use to show a number next to it like the thumbs up does?
Do a video about the turko centrists claims that Iran is 45% turkic please
My second request
Shaka Zulu was Turk #TuranianPride #Hungary
Make Iran
Part of Turan
Elias get off /pol/.
Elias Frahat They are brainwashed by turkish propoganda
azeri turks of iran make up only 16 percent of iran's population.
in my opinion turks are getting brainwashed in the worst possible way. they are taught to be proud of any little stupid thing. like what you just said. they keep repeating that 40 percent of iran's population is turkic and they are proud of it. (the actual number is 20 percent btw) and i as an iranian am always like: so what? 30 percent of turkey's population is kurdish too, does it even matter?
let us I hate the way turks stole the "turan" name from shahnameh and call themselves turanian although the connection between turks and turan is debunked.
Awsome! Big thanks, man! Big Thanks! ^_^
Do a video on greater Tibet, about the people of Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nepal, and Bhutan.
It is a fascinating and often overlooked part of the world.
Yes do a video about THOSE GREAT BUDDHISTS AND HINDUS!!!!!
Congrats on 100k subs, Mason!....I've been here since your video about Indian ethnicity....You should do a video on your ethnicity BTW.....Also I feel that this video should have been named just 'Ethnic census of the world'
Thanks for your work, Masaman. Another great RUclips channel is CaspianReport if anyone is interested in geopolitics. And there's also the GeographyNow! channel.
Living in China for the past couple of years, I say it's pretty obvious that the "Sinitic" group is more of a spectrum which varies from the Mongolian/Manchu/Korean looking northerners to "Chinese" in the central plains, to more Viet/Thai looking southerners. Most speak a variety of Chinese but they look pretty different.
Let frank here , the really enjoyment is the comment section.
Polandgod 75 Love reading the comments :D
Polandgod 75 Reading the comments in a Masaman video is like watching a horror movie. It’s disgusting but disturbingly addictive.
Most of West Africa isn’t considered Bantu. They are in a variety of sub groups
Cool! More like this, please!
I enjoyed this video thanks for the upload
10:49 that bottom map looks like a horse rearing up on its back legs. Artistic af
Any guess as to the likelihood that interbreeding will ever result in a breakdown of the concept of racial grouping? Or will we always just evolve new racial groups?
I guess I should have said ethno-racial groupings.
Killer Dude
Criminy bud, don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel. I didn't say anything about creating new races, just new racial groupings. I was thinking about the groups he talked about whose ancestry is a mix of ethno-racial peoples from different parts of the world. If my terminology was bad, I'll let Masaman correct me.
Pat Mila
Thanks for an actual answer to my question. I suppose I was asking for crystal ball gazing. I do wish I could be alive though, to see the new races, and even the new species that will develop when humankind moves off the earth.
I'm a fairly old guy with some knowledge of genetics but no real background in anthropology or archeology. The topics really are interesting. I just recently found this channel, and the videos are fascinating. However, I am beginning to see a really unfortunate negative that seems to come with the territory. I ask an innocent question, and I've already received one response from a guy who is obviously outraged over something, and another from a clear fanatic. I thought the use of "miscegenation" died with the Third Reich. My daughter is majoring in anthropology in college, and i just hope she isn't going to have to deal with these people for the rest of her life.
Feminazi frequency
Maybe, but it doesn't seem to fit what I observe. I certainly agree that we will always be tribal, and will mingle with those most "like us". But what does "like us" mean? When I meet a new person, their physical appearance is the first thing I notice, and color may be the easiest thing to notice about their appearance. But if I'm attracted to a woman, by the time I'm thinking about looking for a ring I know whether she and I have similar values, similar interests, similar educational levels and similar senses of humor, and those factors are really much more important than her skin color. Her skin color is extremely important if marriage will get both of us disowned by our families and abandoned by our friends, but that just doesn't seem to happen any more. In the early '80s I hired a black physician as an expert witness in a case I was working (I'm a lawyer), and his wife was white. He told me about the hostility both he and his wife experienced with their respective families and old friends. I meet interracial couples today, and nobody gives a damn. If one of my children married an African American or Asiatic person, it wouldn't bother me at all. If they married a low life criminal, I'd be extremely disappointed regardless of the bum's race. In Europe, differences in skin color seem to mean even less than they do to millennial Americans.
I look at the animal world, and animal groups gather not based on unimportant genetic variances, but on familial closeness of group members. That also happens with humans, and that's the part I hope never changes.
I believe the first statement is right. In Latin America everybody is so mixed that we dont care about race anymore, and census dont even ask about race or ethnicity. If interbeeding becomes a huge phenomenon as it was in the colonial era in Latin America I'm sure that the concept of race will eventually become void. But no one can assure whats going to happen.
Great work Massaman
Nice video, bro! What is your nationality btw? Always have been curious
His nationality, judging by his accent, is American.
Xochitl Ilhuicatl he's living in USA but he definitely has non-European ancestries
Togrul Nasirov He's Irish, Iranian, and African American.
50% German/Irish, 25% Iranian, 25% African american
This comment section is something else, but I expected it.
This is very well made, which is why i think you should have went into deeper description in this video... its pretty cursory and you could have bothered to add some details and specifics for every group
I stumbled upon this video because I was curious what the racial breakdown of the world population was and was surprised how difficult it was to find an answer.
Love your work bro
Hello Masaman
The Negrito Population of peninsular malay only number around 4-5 thousand. You may changed something up a little bit because the other indigenous tribes of the peninsula are not negrito so the area which the negrito inhabite in the peninsula is much smaller
I'm creating folders in Pinterest with the various ethnics of the world. I was having some issues with the number of folders and their nomenclatures, so thank you for this video. Your taste for classifying people is close to my passion as a future anthropologist :)
It appears to me that the "mixed race" segment of the human population is set to become a majority. Especially in certain areas of the world. I think that more people are of mixed ancestry than they might think. An example would be in the early 1800's in the USA. If you looked white and had to fill out the census you would select white if you could. The reasons are obvious. A self example: My last name is Celtic, but during the Civil War, the actual paternal line was Norman French. My ancestor was abandoned by the paternal person and a Celtic veteran married her and raised my direct paternal ancestor. In my genetics breakdown there is a large Mediterranean percentage, which was very obvious in the olive complexion and black hair on my maternal side. But they had no idea of that, and they thought it came from our cousins on the Cherokee reservation. I also have a large genetic percentage of West Asian. Also no idea how that came to be. Odd thing is that I look like a Scottish/Irish person. My genetics say I am about 40% northern European. I think as time goes on, the appearance will be less important than in how you self identify and live your life. NOTE: Please do not be offended if I do not respond to any comments on what I have wrote. There are far too many folks using the internet to demonstrate just how ignorant and hateful they can be. To quote one person that commented on a reasoned personal opinion: "if you had a brain". What a complete waste of time. Trying to dig thru the garbage to find reasoned courteous comments, and perhaps respond, is just too difficult for me. It is tiresome. I find it very sad. Take it easy all.
AdHocFuture what's your surname
Black hair in Mediterraneans is NOT common. Brown hair is the common thing. There are even more blond people here than with black hair.
You can check it in this short video (it's in Spain): ruclips.net/video/GQhpn4gXsOo/видео.html (the girls at 0:33 and 1:25 are of Latin American origins, they don't count).
Hi Masaman! big fan of your channel, learned so much about other people around the world and history of the past too, just wondering have you did your DNA ancestry? Please share if you did on your video...
Masaman, there is NO Latin American racial group. The population of Latin America is 60 percent European, 20 percent mestizo/ castizo/ pardo, (in that order), 12 percent African/mulato, 7 percent is Native American or indigenous (mostly from Mexico, Guatemala, Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador). And Asians constitute approximately 1 percent of the population.
The term Latin America only refers to francophone, luso phone, or Hispano phone countries of the American Continent or continents. Hence, Surinam, Guyana, and the anglophone islands of the Caribbean should not be included within Latin America.
Also the term Latino is a US created term to identify people of Latin American heritage living within the borders of the US just like Hispanic.
The English term for people who live in Latin America is Latin American. By contrast, in Spanish the term may be Latino Americano or just Latino. But not in English.
Max Cruz european decents are majority in brazil to, and brazil have half of latin america population...
No majority of Brazil have African blood
Latinos like brazilians argentina mexico are mostly african (70%) indigenous (29.9) and moors (.1)
Max Cruz you are way off on your affirmation. Most Argentines are of European stock. Most Mexicans are mestizos or castizos-European, Native American. A majority of Brazilians are of European stock.
So, is Gisele Bündchen African, indigenous, or a moor?
How about Lío Messi or Pope Francis? African, indigenous, or a moor?
How about Guillermo Del Toro?
African? Indigenous? A moor???
To begin with, the moorish component of Spaniards is about 2 to 8 percent and found only in about 2 percent of the population of Spain. The amount of African slaves to Argentina and Mexico was very minimal, unlike Brazil and the Caribbean. For example, why would Mexico require a big number of slaves, if they had the “encomienda de Indios”???
mexico is mostly indigenous aztec or mayan (90%) some african (9.9) and moor (.1) latinos have no white (anglo, scandinavian, dutch, etc.) they're facts. get over it.
Congratu-f**king-lations lad.
Tis a fine work that needed to be done, specially for Latin America.
This is how we will overcome racism, thought realism.
You can consider this video and the last one your Magnus Opus so far.
Thank you
I would really love to see you make a video on the history of the German(ic)s.
Your channel is awesome!
This Comment section Shows that we have nothing learned from history
The masses are always stupid, hence why we need a meritocracy to prevent stupid people and leeches from gaining power, draining our resources and controlling our society.
Another great video Mr. Man
I am a white person who is concerned about the demographic changes immigration is causing in Europe, but a lot of white nationalists really irritate me. They don't acknowledge that it was our race that created much of the multiculturalism that they hate so much in the world today. It was created during the colonial period. Why do you guys think it is okay to dilute the genes of natives around the world but you get upset that it is now happening to our race? I would support your views more as a white person if you didn't follow this hypocrisy. You guys get upset that Latin America isn't majority white or that whites are becoming a tiny minority in South Africa. I don't support the violence against whites in South Africa and I hope they get out safely, but our colonial ancestors should have known this day would come. I see people here commenting on how whites don't have enough land. Have you seen the map? You guys make me sick. Let's focus on preserving Europe. If Europeans would have always done that we wouldn't be in this mess.
I am a black person who is also concerned about the demographic changes in Europe and most white-nationalist also disgust me not in the way they seek to preserve European culture and genetics but the fact that the solution to these demographic changes in Europe will be through some sort "peaceful ethnic cleansing". Some realize how stupid that sounds and feel that forceful deportation of non-whites in Europe will be the answer and some fully admit it will result in a race war. This is why I despise some people in the Alt-Right except people like Jean Francois Gariepy, Braving Ruin and a few others. As there are many solutions to solve this problem but they choose the most psychopathic and destructive way to solve these problems. I am not surprised though, as, with that kind of movement, you're bound to attract people who innately hate other races and lack no empathy. As a few people in that movement genuinely wants to eradicate sub-saharans who inhabits Africa as they see them as a waste of space and resources.
your link in the description leads to RUclips's main page.
Dempgraphics Guy? Hmm... Interesting name.
"Mirror, mirror on the wall - who is the fairest (pure) of them all?" That would be cool to see based on stats if possible.
The world is doomed
Lol, why?
Racial differences across the planet are interesting, but I think it's even more interesting the ways these different groups live and intermingle within urban areas around the world
Ashkenazi Jews were NOT "so heavily integrated into European populations" from a genetic standpoint. They have about 15% Northern/Eastern European ancestry, with the rest being Middle Eastern and Mediterranean. Culturally, it was more complex, but for the most part they were a distinct ethnic group with explicit Middle Eastern roots.
Classifying "Jews" as a distinct group is completely appropriate seeing as the vast majority of modern Jews fall within a genetic continuum from the Eastern Mediterranean into West Asia, they have historically shared a common ethnic/ancestral identity, common language (Hebrew), common religion (which encompasses every aspect of life), and today share a common land (almost half live there and the majority feel a direct cultural/ethnic connection to it).
Also, southern Slavs are genetically totally distinct from northern Slavs. Romanians are genetically mixed with Italic influences, but either way Bulgarians and Serbs genetically fall closer to Greeks than they do to Poles. Linguistics is NOT a 1-1 indicator of ancestry.
He said that at the beginning of the video that geographically close groups have often more in common than language family groups but theres no way you can present something like that on a map. You are right I myself am a pole and i have never met a bulgarian or serbian that looks polish to me. As for askhenazi i read somewhere that they maintained only 20% of the semit genes. However, the rate of intermerriage between them and spehadric is so high that soon all israeli jews will be mixed except for hasidic.
Crikey mate you do love your stats & graphs. Well done very interesting. Just trying to work out which piece of the pie graph my daughter & nieces drop into? Irish/Chinese/Anglo Saxon Dad. Filipina Mum. My brother's girls their Mum is Egytian/Anglo Saxon decent. 😃
Anyone else extremely confused but interested
Love your research and videos! Just wanted to say if you add up the nations that are Caucasian or mostly Caucasian then it's close to a tie between Caucasian's and East Asians.So if you take your stats in this video of the Caucasian nations which are North West Eurasian Peoples+Southwest Eurasian Peoples+Southern Eurasians Peoples, but of the latter group only adding the Indo-Ayrans as the group that is mostly of Caucasian descent, then you have a population that equals Asia East. Note also you haven't added people in Latin America who are mostly of European descent to this mix. Okay love your work!
Proud white south-american here!
Killer Dude Actually I am. Did my dna ancestry test and Im fully European. So if you dont know, please dont speak
The wave of inmigrants that came to my country (Uruguay) are from the last century, not when the spanish came...
Killer Dude Ill say it, but before that let me tell you that by stating that there are no pure whites in south america just shows your ignorance...You should watch massaman videos on Argentina Uruguay and south Brazil. And yes, I am 41% Iberia, 28% Italy/Greece, 20% Ireland, 6% England, 1% West Europe 1% Scandinavia 2% European east. May I pass you a link showing you this results too?? This is hella dumb
Killer Dude Well but by being south european it doesnt make you less "european". And Im not greek thou, I know Im Italian because of my grandad. Dna ancestry (The test I made) shows you the percentage you have of blood by region, its pretty general thats why it says Italy/Greece in a general way but despite that I know its refering only to Italy. I mean, its obvious that I will not be fully Spanish, or fully German, even white people in America arent so!. But 100% European, I dont doubt it.
Killer Dude And yes, a lot of countries in europe are not taking care of their borders, they should preserve their identity, but after ww2 we all know globalists seized control over europe...
Rodrigo Pfeiff Galf your part of the crew! I’m 99.8% make up of Scandinavian so I’m counted as a pure European. (97% up is counted as pure by analysts). Any white person is welcome here.
Where may we obtain your pie charts and the figures used to draw them please?
Do one on white africans
2:50 Correct. Always came off as common sense yet people would get upset and argue.
Do a vid on the Lemba people. Not much is known about them.
Are Mongolians counted as Altaic and considered Northeast Eurasian? And what are Turkic groups such as Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Tatars, etc. counted as? Depending on where they live and what their appearance is they could fall under Northeast Eurasian, Northwest Eurasian or Southwest Eurasian. Do they just fall under their own geographic category of Central Asian?
First of all: Altaic is a langauge term like indo european and doesnt have anything to do with race.
Also mongolians are northeast asian + central asians.
Turkic people are also north east asians + central asians + Eurasians. Central asian is only geographic term.
In terms of race turkic people are north east asian + eurasians. Mongolians are mostly north east asians + a little bit eurasians.
Please make a video about Taiwanese aborigines. This is my 10th request.
Oh my god, i'm so happy someone finally mentioned the Slavic genetic situation surrounding Hungarians and Romanians. Many foreigners who consider language to be the determinant for one's ethnic background would easily mix Hungarians as an Uralic ethnic group and Romanians as a sub-Italic type of a nation but in reality these peoples don't differe much from their neighbors, which is totally fine and not racist to mention.
Through times Hungarians have mixed with their neighbouring Austrians and Slavs that in the end they've eventually became a Germano-Slavic ethnic group with a very little Uralic/Turkic genetic background, some researches state no more that 1-3% (the only difference regarding genetic background in this case would be within Szekely Hungarians who've been living isolated in central parts of Romania with up to 7% of their Asiatic genes, which is still too insignificant for Hungarians to br labeled as "Asiatic/Uralic/Mongolic people).
As for the Romanians, proto-Romanians were called Dachians and Thracians by the Greeks and were a Balkanic/Dinaric peoples who heavily mixed with Slavs and other Indo-Iranian peoples who've invaded Eastern European basins stretching all across the southern parts of modern-day Ukraine, Moldova and most of Romania. In the period of the Crusades, they've got some Western European genes via marriage/reproduction with Italic and Germanic peoples, which makes up to about 20% of their modern dna. Still, Romanians could easily be labeled as Balkano-Slavic peoples.
In fact, South Slavs have less Slavic genetical background than Hungarians and Romanians, and most of the ex-Yugoslav peoples have no more than 15-20% of Slavic blood, the best example would be Montenegrins with no more than 7% of Slavic genes, eventhough they speak a Slavic language, having been exposed to the Slavic culture and tradition for a long period of time.
Language partially determines one's ethnic background but in most of cases the situation is much more complex considering years of intermixing between many people through occupations, invasions, slavery, intermarriage and so on.
More indigenous videos pls
Cesar Alvarado tu sos mestizo?
Do you think you're native American, or something?
Indigenous to where?
Lks Hom-vidya to America duh.
American Indians
2:00 Romanians are latins, right? what ethnic group do hungarians belong to?
Thanks in advance!
"Latin American" should be a racial category in your map. We do not see ourselves as black or white or whatever, as those are Anglo racial categories and in no way connected to our identity. We see ourselves as "Latino" and that's it. Even then, a sense of shared "Latino" identity isn't very strong, but it hits closer to home than classifying us as "Mestizo", "Black", or "White". These concepts of racial identity are rather foreign to us.
i don´t think so,i´m argentinian and I'm sure I have European ancestry. although lately Argentina is becoming little by little more mestiza by bordering immigration. Uruguay could be de same
but I do agree that Latino could be a common ethnicity. Don´t confuse race with ethnicity.
Latino is pretty much a racial category at this point. In the vast majority of cases (easily over 90%), Latinos are some sort of mix between Mediterranean Europeans and Native Americans, with a bit of Black admixture depending on the region.
It's like saying Europeans are not a race, and instead you divide them between Middle Eastern farmers and Indo-European nomads. It's goofy. Latin Americans are a race, with gradual degrees of Native American and Mediterranean ancestry. Same as Europeans, that also happen to be a race formed by different peoples in the distant past. In short, Latino or Latin American is very much a racial category. Being nit-picky because of some German living in Southern Brazil is pretty damn autistic.
Feminazi, congratulations on talking to socially marginalized people on the internet, largely influenced by American imageboard culture. No, I am sorry to inform you that White Brazilians and White Argentinians do not have separate identities from your average "mixed-race" individual that lives in any of those countries. Plain and simple, it's not true. Swarthy Argentinians are just as cocky and pretentious for being Argentinian, as those of 100% Italian descent. Neither of these groups see themselves as being anything other than Argentinian, and neither of these people would even put each other's "Argentinianness" into question.
I am glad that race is an important aspect of your identity, but race in the Anglo context is not really a thing for us. That is all you need to understand.
krieg9
No... Latin America is only 60% Mestizo, not 90% get your facts straight. Didn't you see the video?
And while Latinos may not see race, this is not accurate... Take for example Hugo Chávez and Nicolas Maduro. Both Latinos from the same country who probably see eachother as the same race. But anyone with an eyesight can tell that they're clearly not. One is afro Latino and the other one is a Mestizo ...
Take for example Mauricio Macri, Enrique Peña nieto and Evo Morales, they are all "latinos" but none of them are the same race. One is white, the other one is Mestizo, the other one is native... The only one who is probably aware that he's of a different race is Evo due to being raise in a different culture (He's ethnically Aymara so his culture is different from that of a regular Latino)
Can someone please define ethnographic-race for me? I cannot find any info on the term. Thanks in advanced.
Good vid I'm sorry to I contribute to the war like conversations and arguments on your vids I'm not proud of it it's hard for me . I appreciate your work and apologize for making some comments not to the best interest of us as human beings.
Can you link the previous video, you mention it a few times but I'm not sure what it is.
ruclips.net/video/zpjbWjy65pA/видео.html
interesting how this type of content lures the racists out there! I guess this is why this is such an uncomfortable topic unfortunately :(
Right, like I just need to stop reading comments on these videos lol
Can we please have 1080p video for once ~_~...
Really wanted to read those stats.
It doesn’t matter the white pop is shrinking. Just let them have there own country’s with a strong white pop and heritage
Common Zenoric What the media brands as "white supremacy" is simply white people's desire to live around each other undisturbed. It's something everyone on Earth wants. It's only bad when Europeans do it, though.
move to greenland
Pill Cosby honestly. As Latino (I’m a Castizo) I hate the mainstream media so damn much.
Goddess Miranda.Cosgrove no. Let them stay were they are
Common Zenoric then why should others be forced to leave? If whites left it would be the most peaceful option
What are "Paleo native americans"
?
When Christopher C. Arrieve to America he believed he was in the India, those the term amerindian to native americans, please dont use that term cause its just wrong, native americans are relative to the mongolid race not the indians.
RexPETA1789 well then what should we call American natives? Turtle islander?
Mason, at 2:03 you also coloured in Moldova, but you didn't mention the Moldovans... NOT a critisizm, just a point. I'm not offended, I'm American, but some Moldovan might call you out on it; but probably not... 💛&✌
I'm proud to be 100% Black.
Anthony Reed Judging by your picture, you must be at least some 20% white lmao
I totally disagreed with you, Bro.
Anthony Reed You're free to do so, but that does not change the facts
ANTONY REED LOVES SIMON K
SIMON K LOVES ANTONY REED
I am from USA I have Hispanic heritage all my living family except for my close cousins uncles and graparents live in the USA but when the census was token I was in Mexico
Do a video on how Mexicans wreck the Europeans when they arrived in the Aztec capital
do you mean aztecs? because mexicans didn't exist before the european arrival to mesoamerica
Al He oh we totally existed before and after European arrival
Mexica. Look it up.
jose juarez Mexico was created by europeans
J Bast Mexico already existed Europeans never conquered Mexico they beaten with spears Aztec swords sling shots while they had cannons and guns
Since my ancestors were Normans who came to Ireland alongside Strongbow, would my genetics be mostly gaelic or a mixture of something else
I think Mars will be 60% European, 30% E. Asian and 10% South Asian.
Kubelwagen, hahahah what kinda question is that, of course not
Kubelwagen Maybe Neil deGrasse Tyson, but not one more on the ethno-planet.
What value would Neil deGrasse Tyson bring? He's not even a practising scientist.
Kubelwagen i wish u said that irl sigh
But there won't be any black people on Mars, let alone a majority.
7:51, you should have included dardic peoples with middle easterns. They physically look more like middle easterns than south asians.
Do a video about Iraq please
Or about Assyrian/Armenian people
Can you stop doing "do a video about this and that please"
God Emperor Fou-Lu I will minimize it but will not stop
Kurdish Aryan Median Hurrian Hittite as a kurd it's very disrespectful to be racist to other ethnicities and races or else no will like us and won't give us land
Hoi19448239345 lol the only reason why the Christians are in the kurdish region is to keep away from the arabs and you don't know shit about iraq
Btw if hating on Islam isn't racist then why is hating on Christianity racist?
Spooky Noodle our issue that kurds want to repopulate the Christian areas and arab/turkmen areas with kurds in a non peaceful way and add it to kurdistan that why we send the army to kurdistan
Great information. I'm trying to understand your statistics on people of African origin. Does it include African Americans? I'm curious since you separated Afro Latinos into their own statistical group. AA's don't fit into that category, so I wanted clarification on whether AA's were absorbed into the African statistical group.
Lalia3131 he did include African Americans and Afro Caribbeans into people of African Ancestry
Thanks for the reply. For clarification, yes, AA's are obviously of African descent. My question was whether they were placed under the statistical umbrella of the Afro latinos and Afro carribeans or whether they fall under the general category of Africa.
Lalia3131 they were shown as one of African descent groups, separate from afrocarribeans and afrolatinos.
Adiyar Zharmenov thank you again. When looking at the conclusion of his statistical findings it was a bit unclear to me.
Lalia3131 his grouping is not law nor infallible... make ur own chart don’t follow his. It is obviously biased...he separates Africa n Asia but lumps all of Europe together ...that should be the first clue that he cannot be trusted
he lables the African people of Latin America and Caribbean as afro but lables amerians of African descent as "black" black is not a race
justin ramos exactly n he does not divide Europe,,,, what r they afraid of?
You guys know he's part African American right? He "split up" Europeans multiple times. Stop getting your knickers in a bunch.
Because African American are KNOWN to identify themselves as black. It's fine if you don't but most people I've met in America call themselves black. Also he's half black.
He hates europeans and is quite good at hiding it.
C. Morgan Free yea because most of them are naive
Masaman why is the northern part of somalia semitic and not cushitic? One of my ethnic hometowns lay at that point