Still upset that a multi-U router replaces the amazing MX204. Size footprint aside the power consumption is higher. Do like the idea about a chassis router in it's form factor. However it's price point, means that it can't be a direct replacement for the 204.
Still upset that a multi-U router replaces the amazing MX204. Size footprint aside the power consumption is higher.
Do like the idea about a chassis router in it's form factor. However it's price point, means that it can't be a direct replacement for the 204.
Missing 204 too
Great video
*Terabit, not teraBYTE
Does it support SDN?
Inglish