Visishta Advaitha - One, Many or Many as One ? | Chinna Jeeyar Swamiji |
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 июл 2024
- #DiversityAndInclusion #Equality #Dvaitam #Advaitam #Visishtadvaitam
HH Sri Chinna Jeeyar Swamiji can deliver an address to scholars on a deep Vedic philosophical topic for hours and leave them spellbound. Swamiji also holds the attention of little kids on the same intense topic by giving easy to understand examples in routine life.
Hundreds of dancers interacted with Swamiji on topics that enhance their perception of life to embody the entire existence with love.
For more details :
☛ Subscribe us @ / jetworld
☛ Like us on / jeeyarswamy
☛ Visit us @ chinnajeeyar.guru/chinnajeeyar
☛ Follow us on
Very well explained for the sake of common man. Kids friendly. This is how we should convey the different sampradayams of Sanathana Dharma and let the seekers chose their desired path. Thanks to Sri Chinnajeeyar Swamiji who is able to decipher complex subjects into simple subjects for the sake of people like me.
Jay shreeman narayena swami ji adiyen jay ramanuja swami ji jay jay
Sri Sri Sri Swamiji not only explains Sri Vaishnava Siddhantha so well but he also respects other sampradayas. Respecful Pranaams to swamiji.
🙏🙏🙏జై శ్రీమన్నారాయణ🙏🙏🙏
జై జై జై శ్రీమన్నారాయణ 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏
Sri Vishnave Namaha Jay Shreeman Narayana Alwar Emperumanar Jeeyar Tiruvadigale Sharanam 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Jai srimannarayana 🙏 Sri Sri Sri Chinna Jeeyar Swami Divya tiruvadigale saranamu 🙏
Jai srimannrayana swamy. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Jai Srimannarayana
So very beautifully in a very simple manner the explanation of advita, dvaita, and Vishita advaita- explanations given with wonderful analogies. Great. Chinna Jeeyar Swamigal Thiruvadigale Sharanam. 🙏🙏🙏.
Om asmadu gurubyo namaha jai sreeman narayana
Jai Srimmanaryana
JAISRIMANNARAYANA 🙏
Jai srimannaraayana Jai Jai srimannaraayana 🙏🌹🙏🌹🙏🌹🌹🙏
జై శ్రీమన్నారాయణ అడియేన్ రామానుజ దాసు దాసో హం
Jai sreemannarayana
Jai Ramanuja 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha acharyan tiruvadigale sharanam Guruvugariki Padhabhi vandanalu 🙏🙏🙏
Jai srimannrayna jai Ramanuja Namaha
Asmadgurubhyonamaha. Vaisakamasamulo vishnuthathvam sarvamathasaramunusarvasadarana saililotheliyasinanduku meeku dhanyavaadaalu. Jaisrimannarayana.
Excellent explanation about vaishnav . I never heardsuchtypeofsathsangam. Thankyousomuch. Swamijigarikipadabhivandamu. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😄
Jai srimanarayan 🕉️🕉️🕉️🙏🙏🙏
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏jai sri manarayana
శ్రీ చినజియర్ స్వామి వారు ఆయనగారుఅనుకొన్నదినెరవేర్చుకొన్నారు,సమతామూర్తివిగ్రహం.
Pranams acharya
Jai shreemanNaaraayana
Om Asmatgurubyo namaha 🙏🙏🙏🌹
Jai srimanarayana 🙏🏻🙏🏻
🙏🙏
Swami pranams jaihind Aruna dasohamulu
Adiyen ramanuja dasan
Jai srimannarayana 🙏🏻
Jai srimannaryana 🙏🙏
🥏 *_ओऽम् नमो नारायणाय_* 🐚
6:00 Starts 🎉
Jai srimanarayana
Swamiji says perspective of saying Mango is collectively ONE. That is also wrong when comes Brahman. Is Brahman a collection of Chit and Achit only? Is there no pure Brahma tatvam? Such view may be valid in mundane object such as mango, but goes against Vedic assertion. For example when shruti say nEha nAnAsti kiMchana (Here in Brahman, there are no difference (nAnatva)), it goes against "collective one" idea Swamiji is spreading here
None.
This Swamiji does not have correct understanding of his purva-paxa. He says (showing mango in his hand) Dvaita philosophy holds properties are different. He is wrong in saying so. Dvaita school does not say guNas(properties) of Brahman per se different from Brahman. Brhaman and His guNas are same. What is different is Jivas and Jadas are different from Brahman. Swamiji please do not spread wrong knowledge to growing kids. This will be adharma prachara.
OMG, Swamiji is wrong about his own Sidhanta (let alone about pUrva paxa). He says saying only ONE is also correct along with saying Many. If what he is saying is correct that makes Ramanuja's refutation of Advaita in his Sree Bhashya is all useless. Otherwise why he would taken trouble to break away from his Guru Yadvapaksha who is an advaitin? Why he took such an effort in exposition of mahA-pUrvapaksha? I wonder is this Chinna-Jeeyar an neo-vedantin?
of the six vedic shools, dwaitham profunded by Sankaracharya swamy is one and there are other five schools who have accepted qualified monism.
jivaas and jada (prakruthi) are pravatha satyam which means they keep changing which is also a realty and both can't exist with out the support of bramhan.
When we say one bramha which means he is always with jiva and prakruti which is visista advaitham.
@@JaiPrakash-pq1pj First of all, please educate yourself. Dwaitham is not established by ShankaraCharaya, but Sri.Madhvachaarya. You seems to imply just because majority of others are accepted Qualified Monoism, it must be valid. If I take your argument seriously, you should embrace Islam as worlds most people accepts Islam!!!! Majority is not the measure of philosophical correctness. Agreed jIva and jada cannot exist withour Brahman supporting, but in your Visitadvaita Lord Vishnu alone is not Brhamn, but Vishnu along with Jiva and Jada is Brhman. So, in your philosophy Lord Vishnu is "Dependent" on others to be called "Brahman". In my Dvaitam, Lord Vishnu is independent and alone called 'Brahman" w/o any dependent on jIva or Jada. That is the quite vedic position.
@@ratipati2007 thanks for correcting it was a typo it should be 'dvaitam'.
Bramhan is dependant ...?
Ok then who are you and why are we existing and what is this nature?
prakṛitiṁ puruṣhaṁ chaiva viddhy anādī (BG 13.20) how do you explain this terms, prakriti, prusha and anaadi.
but i shall leave this discussion here, let you continue your belief in your perceived way and let me continue in my way.
@@JaiPrakash-pq1pj Let me explain. According to Sri.Ramanujacharya, Brahman is not alone Vishnu, but Brahman is Vishnu+Jiva+Jada hence it is advaita (non-dual). In this scheme, Vishunu alone cannot be called Brahman but He has to to have Jiva & Jada as His organs to be called Brahman. Otherwise if Vishnu alone is considered BRahman, why would Ramajuja calls his philosophy (Visista) Advaita? Hence, my argument is Vishnu is equally dependent on Jiva and Jada as much as other two are on Him. This idea of Vishnu being "paratantra" is anti-vedic and hence we reject that idea of Vissitadvaita matha. Hope you see the issue now.
In Dvaitam, Vishnu is absolute Independent. Jiva and Jada are dependent realities which needs Vishnu for their existence. Hence we do not call all three of them collectively "Brahman", but Vishnu alone is Brahman. We posit absolute difference (bhEda) between Vishnu and Jiva/Jada.
@@ratipati2007 please quote to which reference you are leading this conclusion to.
Flawed logic as usual this swamy has a long way to go before he starts making sense
support your statement with quoting a reference please.
J_aisrimamsrayan
Jai Srimannarayana
Jai srimanarayan 🕉️🕉️🕉️🙏🙏🙏
Jai Srimannarayana