The Creativity Delusion (FULL): Brains, Geniuses and Originality
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
- A 3-chapter documentary about the stories we tell ourselves around creativity. Using a plethora of studies from anthropology, psychology and neuroscience, the film tries to demystify the way we use our brains to create, to make art and science.
The products of our minds are extraordinary, but the process in which they are brought about are in fact, quite ordinary. Shakespeare copied. Mozart copied. Picasso copied too. But we're still obsessed with originality.
We're living in the most creative time in humanity's existence, so maybe it's time to rethink our preconceptions about creativity.
FULL SOURCES, STUDIES, CREDITS: copy-me.org/ 
Кино
Art is expression. Expression is art. ... Some people don't have much to express.
Because they don't know how to learn.
As a creative person, I can tell you that some ideas take time and a lot of thinking and at other times it just happens... in a moment.. randomly... magically.
I think that it is important to be prolific…set constant goals and don’t get stuck in your past creations
That's great advice thank you!
What I love the most is when talented people take what I like and give it a spin, not just create something “new,” which, by the way, it's almost impossible to create now... Thank you.
Everything is new if time is involved in the same idea every new moment has a new context, and everything is new always. We are always moving forward for better or worse
Seems like everything is a rehash now
It's what they say, good artists copy, great artists steal
@@Cappuccino_Rabbit That was a wrong explanation. A great artist, (or engineer), re-imagines, refurbishes or re-visualises a thing, into some thing new.
There is a certain type of creativity that comes from hard work. However there is absolutely a creativity that comes from the "unconscious". It comes forward as though you're being possessed by a spirit and you have to surrender to it and let it have control to let it come through you. You can't think about it to much or it won't come out. I experience this often. It comes easier with experience and time doing it, because it is true obviously that with practice over time you can get better at anything
i believe you're partly right. I like to tell people that ideas have ideas of their own. Most people don't understand how expansive the 'mind' actually is. Literally everything is already right there. and it's very animated.
I refer to this as quantum jumping, accessing the ability from an alternate self in a parallel reality... I am in like a trance like state and am shocked at what I created when I'm finished...
I wish it worked like that on guitar lol. You literally cannot become creative unless you force yourself to learn the most difficult ear training methods from the beginning, or grind like a mad man.
There might be an unrecognized process where once you are good at something, when it becomes 'second nature', it is actually your confidence that unlocks access to that 'zone' where you just allow to happen. Surely also other ways to access it, but that might be a part of it. When we love what we do, it also comes with a certain confidence that what we do is enjoyable.
More than once in my creative projects I eventually 'received help' to give it the final, crowning touch, as if it was someone else's contribution that surprised me very positively.
There is also a somewhat related advice among writers, that you should create interesting characters and then just put them in challenging situations and explore what they do. If you can imagine that, you can (non-)do it. Your characters write themselves.
Master-tier when you can then become an outside observer to that process you channel.
Lol...I was about to say something like that...aha-moments are not a myth, people get them, lol...just because you have to work at the ideas you get in those moments doesn't mean such ideas don't exist...and you can pretty much have a fully formed idea in your mind, even if, ultimately, it changes and evolves when written down, lol...I think that probably applies to all arts and to science and math, lol...there aha-moments...an introductory psychology book I had discusses them, lol, but also talks about hard work...and that work might not be that hard, lol, for some people...I sometimes wonder if many who say such things don't exist know very well that they do, lol, but say that to be helpful, to be encouraging, lol, so people can make an effort, lol...
In the end some people are just more creative than other people.
Creation is not a destination. It is the journey.
I feel like Creativity is self defined and by society, even though it's not just fine arts. It can be something like cooking or building, or organizing a room to your liking. I feel like everybody has the same capacity for creativity whether they act on it or not and how much is the difference in that perception.
@@MichaelTurner856
The evidence says otherwise. I see images in my minds eye. I am exceptionally spatially gifted. There are people who do not see images in their minds eye. Those people will undoubtedly have less creativity.
@@psychicspy - for me - it was a matter of Will and Understanding. I don't have innate Creativity; especially in the MBTI sense. For me - Creativity is something I have to find Outside of Me. However, after finding my favorite artists, and seeing some of the greatest artworks ― I started to have ideas; and now it's a huge amount of great ideas, mostly for paintings. Those are inspired by random images on the web. I'm using my taste in art to see something that could be transformed into an artpiece, in the most mundane things. Now, someone who doesn't have a taste for Art ― probably can't do anything about it. But most people choose to have a mediocre taste in art (even if subconsciously).
Factually you are incorrect.
I created this comment, now I'm on to my next creation.
@@encouraginglyauthentic43
But it wasn't a very creative comment. Thank you for making my point.
as well made as this video is, creativity definitely exists
Yes, but I think the point is that it isn't mystical or magical. It's hard work
@@seandavies5130 Not always lol
@@seandavies5130 Creativity is not forced, one cannot simply study how to be creative, follow some steps and achieve it. Although the hard work comes in the form of extensive base knowledge and executing on ideas that come from the creative process. From my own perspective, it is a state of mind like daydreaming and letting the mind wander. When the mind is wandering are you guiding the wander or are you observing it? That begs the question what 'it' is that you are observing, I'd say I'm a fairly creative person and find creativity magical for sure, doesn't mean it's exclusive to some chosen few, rather the opposite. I liken creativity to being a spider in the middle of the web 'feeling' for the vibration of the fly (solution or idea) rather than actively thinking for what I want to know, because thinking in itself is limited but still necessary to confining the mind wandering so you don't get too off track.
@@sarahbroussard7489 this entire comment is off track. 😂
Anyone can be creative that's why it's beautiful
Not all artists are geniuses
But all geniuses are artists
Depends on how you define "genius". Could become self-validating belief.
People would call someone who can recite a million digits of pi a genius, but how is that art. Art is not a calculator mind. Art is not a Chinese boy's perfectly accurate reproduction of Mozart's key stroke sequences.
Define genius, but before you give me your answer, do extensive research on the topic, even view perspectives that challenge your belief.
FYI, all beliefs are equally valid since you can't prove or disprove anything.
I like your video. I never thought of myself as a geniuos. There are so many things to do. I am a music composer for movies, and television. A few years ago I never dreamed that I could do these things, but I applied myself to learning how to compose music. I didn't know anything about music theory, but through listening I learned how to compose. Anyone can do this, but not everyone will.
"Anyone can do this, but not everyone will." to me is a familiar indicator of trying to justify own sacrifice made in pursuit of something.
Supporting conditions need to exist, and creating them is often not in our control. You can nag someone to learn making music and their music might sound like total shit because it is an expression of the clusterfudge of a life situation they are subjected to.
There is a large cynicism in society where people capitalize on pain that coerces them into pursuing a creative career out of fear.
Spirituality teaches toolsets for studying oneself from an outside view so that we see all these things and stop trying to propagate our own individual path as general rule. This can be scary because it can lead to very down-to-earth epiphanies.
@@DowlphinI disagree with your assessment.
You just don't want to take responsibility for your adult life. Childhood is out of your control, but when you're out on your own you can't blame mommy or daddy.
How does this video have less than 10K views and less than 1K likes. Brilliant work!!
Practice + Skill + technique + concept + media + outlet + connections = Art
Art = Expression
This is a garbage thesis with garbage conclusions... Just because testing fails to uncover genius, does not mean it doesn't exist.
A guy eating food gets thousands of votes in a day while this video gets 62 votes in 7 months. This says something about the current times.
Some people are curious, interested in ideas, always seeking. Others just want to watch cat videos or football.
It always been like this. Low effort watching will always be more popular
This video appeals to geniuses. There are very few compared to the rest of the population. Hence, the low view count.
Hey now, Mark Wein can be very interesting.
@@LilyGazou The world was built by the curious thinkers, the rest are just along for the ride. The problem, is that they all want to believe they are builders, and not just on the ride. There is very little humility left in the world. peace
I liked the video a lot, it's very thought provoking and allowed me to question my own personal views on creativity and originality. Anything we do here will always be an imitation of life, especially nowadays since we don't live life anymore, we work to make a living, and we "entertain" ourselves when we're not working. This video may have ideas that you may not agree with, but I think its main purpose is to point to the things that hinder creativity, and to clarify that it's not reserved for a gifted few. All of us have the potential to build upon the existing world, and make something new. In today's society, I don't think originality should be the main focus of our endeavors, but whether it'll be good for us as a whole, or not, because we're in some muddy water right now.
SELF stimulation is supremely superior to simulation. In The SELF is all our yearning to be accepted beyond genuine genius. The flash of inspiration is the Original Consciousness🧘of the Present, a gift💝unnoticed!
I would like to share my own personal experience of creating as a poet and artist myself. I almost never plan beforehand what I’m gonna write about, the feelings and sentences all come to me in one moment of inspiration. Now this work looks something like an unpolished diamond at first and we need to polish it. So in the second stage, after the foundation has been laid is when we apply our technical skills to the work in order to polish our diamond. These poems always turn out to be one of my best. On the other hand there are times when I would just sit down and try to force an original idea but it doesn’t work that way sadly. Those works are nothing in comparison to the ones that came to me in that one moment of spark. It doesn’t matter that I have all the skills to polish a perfect diamond when I don’t have a diamond to polish in the first place and that one idea, one moment of inspiration is the diamond.
So from personal experience I disagree with this video essay.
I feel the same way. Freestyling (improv rhyme and whatnot) doesn’t always yield the best results for me, but every now and then some verses seem to manifest in an instant that are absolutely coherent and relevant to a particular theme. I usually don’t catch it until listening to the playback when i record myself and sometimes im actually surprised/impressed by the impeccable cohesion of the content. Don’t get it twisted though, i’m not boasting or bragging; there’s a ton of garbage I’ve recorded over the years. For whatever reason every now and then I’ll churn out a diamond amongst turds. Maybe that’s just the result of repetition, but I’m still perplexed why it is that most times when the intention is “create” the product is rather clinical and the really cool stuff seems to emerge from a casual “non results-oriented” approach.
Creativity or artistic ability is not limited to certain individuals in my opinion, but rather a universal capability or trait of humanity itself. It depends upon whether or not someone is afforded the opportunity and time to develop those abilities. This video might make some points, but upon deeper examination they appear quite arbitrary. Just my opinion after all, which is ultimately arbitrary in itself. I’m just wasting time with this comment…🫤
@@mizzamoe no you’re not wasting time, thank you for sharing your experience. It’s nice to see what other artists and creators think about this.
Obviously, everything is relative... Absolutisms and conclusive positions are tautological, that is, they try to validate themselves. In any argument of a speech there is a bias... And this video essay is no exception. In his goal of demystifying pure originality, which, indeed, in reality does not exist ("there is nothing new under the sun"), it ends up simplifying and vulgarizing the process of creativity, which in itself is a complex system with multiplicity paths of holistic characteristics.
@@jlonzoy i agree completely!
@Matthew Trevino from what I've read from you, I visualize those moments when you casually walk around a space and say the item in question is car keys. You're not intentionally looking for them, in fact you walk past them and you notice them in your vision from every angle. You lock it in your mind like "I know where they're at." Then crunch time hits and it's time to go somewhere and just now your terminator brain is on which makes you hyper sensitive to things not going your way, starting with these god damn keys. Something you've seemed to possess all this time somehow magically grown feet and casually walked away. The hyper focus almost always makes the room black out because you've could've sworn they were RIGHT HERE. Now you're late and your level of fucks given is depleted and you think "oh well." You sit to gather yourself to regroup. As you carelessly fall into your favorite chair you hear the sound of metal under your hand. And boom. There's the keys. Creativity is funny that way. Don't think about it just use the want to, to produce. And by proxy your intention will manifest. I think we think too much.
The end point of this video talks about so many similar ideas all happening at the same time, which could be used as an argument that ideas come from the collective unconscious of a society
So we're helicopter-parenting our own creativity 😂😭
Skill it is all about skill not talent there is a major difference between the two
Great work, I love your voice.
Incredible video; thank you.
This was a really good video. Well done 👍 I thoroughly enjoyed it
If it wasn't for Lewis Lattimer, Edison would still be trying to keep the light bulb shining
Great video
BE=mc2🧬GENUINE=mc2, LIVE=mc2 in de'Light!🎶
Great video❤
Eye opening video.
This video has some weird ides, and it definitely has an agenda: "Copy-Me is a webseries debunking the myths of copyright and copying."
The video is not amazing but have a lesson in video edition! Bravo! 😍
Genius is genuine when it's closest to the Uncaused Cause, before the 1st cause, the echo of the Sound Source of Resonance in Reason, not following in the foot👣steps of stealing in a Digital Treason Season!
The genius works alone in a cave, needs nothing else but his own research, the works he does are original and only from the ideas of his own?😮 that’s me!☺️🙏🏽
Do you have ac in the cave?
Did you say creation is a location? So I’m a location? I’m at a location but I move around. I am a creation. I was brought forth into this creation. I’m not really understanding. Someone created a guitar. I wouldn’t say I’m headed over to guitars. Am I looking at it wrong or miss a fundamental step or just plain misunderstand the whole concept?
It was figurative language baby.
If creativity is understood as conceiving the immaterial and rendering it material, then everyone with a box of crayons and a bare wall can be considered 'creative'. Where 'genius' enters the discussion is when what is conceived and rendered has some social significance -- a shift in understanding, a new mode of transport, a better mouse trap -- not a mention in the local paper vis-à-vis one's science fair volcano. Whether or not the individuals themselves are 'geniuses' or ever think of themselves as such (since many generally don't concern themselves with these matters), is neither here nor there, although IQ, more specifically g-factor, contributes greatly. Thurman did prove IQ wasn't a predictor, and to be sure, no great accomplishment comes without sweat equity, but accelerated processing, better memory, broader interests and skills, the general modus of the terminally curious means they can draw from a deeper and vaster pool of knowledge and experience (whether 1st or 3rd hand) to bear on a problem. What some read as intuition (Eureka) is little more than the mind cracking a safe by twiddling with the dials and listening for the tumblers -- connections and patterns, in this case -- requiring a kind of sustained attention not typical. Where truly innovative ideas originate, I suspect, is in connections drawn from widely disparate domains, relations not considered or attempted before. In short, the more you travel, read, relate with others, remain curious and observant, the more you explore various skills such as art, music, trades, and so on, the more you are able to incorporate into your problem solving, but all of these come at the cost of an investment in time, effort and motivation to mastery. Being seven feet tall doesn't presume one is good at basketball but 'predisposed?', yes, or at least advantaged in one important area, a head start, so to speak. Otherwise, it's a non-issue and the individual who applies themselves will always trump raw intelligence or talent in the broader scheme.
G factor has nothing to do with genius it's called being a systems thinker.
Amazing! So underrated. Great job guys!
So there is no subconscious nor conscious mind, there is only a mind that works in different ways and needs some breaks in between that work?
The subconscious and conscious mind is a metaphor, so you can be more aware of the things you do.
Most people just move on autopilot.
The video is about The promotion of the culture of corruption.
May i propose a different view on „talent“? I see talent as a genuine interest and passion for a certain field or expertise.
Talent is proof that a person has the knowledge and aptitude for something.
thanks
When I was in second grade my IQ was tested at 140+, which is considered genius. But I'm one of the stupidest people I know.
Haha😂. Same thing happened to me.
I was very good at book learnin' but I'm pretty stupid when it comes to understanding human interaction
@@carbunkle5643 ..and the people who are good at human interaction aren't good enough at book learnin' to explain it, and usually find it hard to understand that anyone would need to have it explained.
@@carbunkle5643 I would argue you're not as good as you think, do you have a zettelkasten?
Observing
UNDERSTANDING
Evaluating
Please turn the mumusic down when you're speaking, it's so distracting for someone with ADHD. Otherwise, a great video x
Of course creativity exists. Creativity is simply seeing the underlying patterns and connections in reality - some people can see them, and some people can't. I don't know if you can teach yourself to see these patterns. I think it's got more to do with the brain you were born with.
A "a-ha" moment is basically when you get a glimpse of the box cover of the jigsaw puzzle - you get a sudden flash of the "big picture". You still have to grind out the completion of the puzzle, but the flash gives you the motivation and the insight to complete it. I spent 10 years studying language but I never saw the big picture, i never had the flash. Then one day I began speaking words out loud and slowly rolling the words around my mouth. In an instant, it all became clear - everything fell into place and for the first time I saw the big picture, I saw how everything I learned was all connected - I knew where I needed to go and what I needed to learn.
Instead of having lots of little islands of knowledge, I saw the full map, I saw all the connections between all the islands. This is why I fundamentally disgaree with this video - I had exactly the same knowledge before my flash than after, yet my knowledge of the subject was radically different. Someone else could have all the knowledge I have but without seeing the big picture, it's just not the same. It's not about the details, it's about seeing the big picture - some people are born with the ability to see the full map, others can only see little bits of it.
You are incorrect, seeing patterns is what brains naturally do. If we couldn't see patterns we wouldn't be able to predict certain outcomes or learn from our mistakes.
Who defines a idea as great that sounds pretty assinine
Clearly a video made by someone who has never experienced a moment of inspiration.
Takes one to know one I guess….
They're not saying that inspiration doesn't exist, they are demystifying the notion that geniuses get their greatest ideas through sparks of inspiration, while also pointing out that original ideas usually build upon existing ones. The point of debunking inspiration wasn't to debunk its existence, but rather to debunk our perception of its source. Inspiration doesn't come from thin air, it comes from our unconscious, which is formed by the lives we live, or technically, the lives we don't live.
@nocantry They did not prove the source of inspiration, they put forth a theory.
@@nocantrythis is a genius reply. 👏
@@michaeljohnson2470 Yes, it is definitely a theory.
why music ?
The narrator of this video seems to be just as beautiful as😎SHE=mc2 SOUNDS🗣️👄 🎺🎶
Food for thought -- confrontational AND inspirational ! 🏆
The word is really, "Borrowed" over "Stolen". Whoever carved the "Original Steeler" has thus carved a niche in the human🧠mind that needs to steal, not made of true mettle metal stronger🦸than any story's🎙️steel!
👍
Excellent video! Well done. 😊
What do u do
Not seeing the destination is the actual creative process
Amazing. I think this is my favorite RUclips video ever.
“Genius is eternal patience.” - Michelangelo
❤
yummy - thank you 'Copy-Me' :O)
The Future is pulling US from the Past pushing the 💝 Present around the clock⏰. Get over measurement; free your will until IT truly births Our Own Freed Will!
My bro theory about creativity is that no human by themselves ever has a unique creative idea. True uniqueness and creativity comes about only through the fusion of humans and psychedelic drugs….
I disagree with your bro theory.
Creativity doesn't require any drugs, but some people need drugs to stop judging themselves.
This discounts the role of ego. Most creative geniuses are ego centric. This is necessary in order to go against social conventions. You cannot be modest and be the only one going against the crowd.
I disagree. They are stressed out and most likely perfectionists with social anxiety because they need to work alone much of the time.
The best artists I know are very shy and humble even after achieving high levels of success.
@@seame3795When you view creativity as something beyond actual art, you get guys like Elon Musk.
amazing documentary . i watched 3 or 4 times great work .
It's not a documentary.
its a daily prayer for me....i was trapped in the original idea trap all my life....90% of us do...i see them now
it's like the human physiology...we are just previous DNA...better better and better
Interesting however genius is outside the normal. Newton and Bernoulli created Calculus at the same time.
Genius is the ability to see connections that others don't.
Genius is the ability to make connections where others could not. The vast majority of people do not exhibit genius. Quite the opposite. The vast majority of people are on the world, not in it.
Excellent presentation. Creativity is a misnomer. The process is more of an augmentation. Like dipping a clean wick into hot wax. The
If my words did not coincide with the topic of this video, my words would be ignored.
Thus for a person to convey any concept to another person, the words used in the concept must be terms that society has agreed upon.
Case in point: The KnoWellian Universe Theory.
If I did not uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the sayings of Socrates to describe a moment of time as infinite.
The KnoWellian Universe Theory carries zero meaning with 99.999% all humans.
However; in the future, the KnoWellian Universe Theory may dethrone Big Bang Theory.
BLeave it or Not.
~3K
Not society but the person that you are talking to.
Many people get into semantical arguments.
All is Mind
Sorry this is short sighted and assumes too much about how and what everyone thinks about things. It's not just one way, sometimes great ideas are received in an instant, sometimes they result from thinking about a problem for a while. Of course hard work helps to improve things but it's also reasonable to say some people, no matter how much hard work they do, still won't have great ideas.
You have limited beliefs.
Great ideas are created from your current knowledge base.
I support most of what is said here, however I have experienced unconscious processing of ideas myself many times. Whether an idea comes from internalised resources or from personal additions to external stimulation a moment of realisation can seem like a sudden understanding without scaffolding our learning. Furthermore, I have witnessed unconscious plagiarism where the subject believes the idea is their own but eventually it is proven that s/he has seen it elswhere and forgot the witnessing. Claiming the ownership of an innovative idea knowing that it is not ones own is theft.
Explain what you mean by unconscious processing of ideas, because if you can't put it into words it hasn't been processed.
Most people are concerned with how, what, when, & where more than why & who is the real inquirer. The majority fools in the game of fame rules. Science 🔭 needs rare jules to energize its non-intuitive schools!
Is synthesis creativity? As in a rock and a stick.
“Sounds never dissipate they only recreate in another place” EWF
The mind can be predicted by the tools such as the overlooked astrology, because people want control and astrology only gived you direction…
A creation of the mind cannot predict the mind.
A creation of the mind cannot predict the mind.
Clearly this video is advocating "stealing and copying" as the biggest contributing factor to the works of prominent artists and musicians like Michael Angelo, Mozart and Da Vinci which is a false exaggeration. These artists had never copy-pasted previous material ditto same without adding personal inputs (called "Creativity") to the body of work. In most cases only a small motif or essence of the whole original was reproduced. We not talking about wannabes and content copycats which still exist in our time and are undeniably putting in no work or distinctive elements into their content. Speaking of the great artists and musicians mentioned in this video, most of their work stands as a signature body of work and gives them a unique identity and an identifiable style. Mozart may have learned opera from the Italians (who didn't) but to discredit his Piano Concerto repertoire is a huge bias. Handel was mostly isolated from Bach's work when he wrote his own fugues. It would be highly biased, uninformed and too generalized claim to say that a significant portion of the works of all so-called great artists in human history was essentially unoriginal copied material.
How do you know that these artist were original. Oh yeah, you don't.
Very good assessment of this. Before the Internet, and even television, radio, global connectivity and transportation, it was vastly more difficult to borrow, modify, re-formulate and re-appropriate new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, art, and music. The iconic work of early masters deserves recognition as truly embodying creative genius.
But now….now that is not possible. Very little is truly unique, and what rarely is so, quickly becomes assimilated and cliche. Idiots now have access to a universe of knowledge and ideas, and U$E a power they cannot appreciate fully.
@@chriscook2479 You probably don't understand the second line of the comment. I don't blame you.
👍
🙂
This is infantile even by RUclips standards. I can’t watch the rest of it.
🥷🏼♠️7️⃣3️⃣0️⃣®️💤
Creativity and inspiration are two different things ideas in video total speculation
Although including many partial truths so much described in this video is wrong. Yes, creative abilities are available to and used by everyone, and grow with practise and hard work; however, truly innovative creative breakthroughs in most fields are limited to a special few moments and individuals not accessible to most people. This video reads as like a team of frustrated mediocre functionaries trying to take down brilliant creative innovators.
Why seemingly everybody these days is adding shitloads of annoying background music, Its so distracting
Who’s idea was it to have this ridiculously loud thumping, clapping, music in the background. U can barely hear the video at certain points.
Great video. Not the first or last documentary about creativity this video proves. My thought is creativity is similar to evoloution, each idea has made an improvement on the last.
Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in awhile. This is the most ridiculous video I’ve ever watched. Awesome editing does not a novel idea make. The world simply is not fair, neither within the diversity of intelligence across the human race or within the very laws of nature. The pursuit of equality, although futile, is indeed a noble one as long as it does not involve dragging everyone down to the lowest common denominator through concepts such as the one you have just proposed.
Hmm…this video is absolutely right in its thesis, but by the conclusion, it isn’t very inspiring for an artist or creative living today
Great work with this documentary👍
Completely, not true. But, even if it were true... Why would anyone be interested, save a few loved ones, in the art, or expressions, of someone with a lame world view, or a short sighted one, or a mundane, uninterested view of he world?
The art that captures our attention, and integrates into the fabric of who we are, is the art, expression, of people who see what others do not. Great art makes everyone see it.
One idea, imo, you have correct. The idea that creativity is in all of us, and a part of all of us. But, the people labeled 'genius', are superior thinkers in every way.
* that is just one cultural list, the technical list is IQ, which are people who have proven themselves in testing, to be superior thinkers, every time, and remain consistently so, throughout, their lifetime. You report just flat out fabricates statistics. And the whole race, and eugenics narrative is ridiculous and might qualify as hate speech.
You know what is ironic, I'm not sure about this, but I believe dark skinned Africans, and specific communities in Africa, have the highest IQ averages. Regardless, geniuses occur in any culture, it is simply a classification named by the scientist who created the IQ. It was the name given to the highest scoring classification. He chose it, bevcause it was already in use in ancient Rome, as a guardian angel, which in usage became associated with people who's 'genie', genius, seemed to give them special knowledge, because there was no explanation for why they should have such knowledge.
ANd, that's pretty much how that scientist described it, paraphrasing, 'These peopleseem to be able to access knowledge at a different level that others cannot. There is seemingly no nexplanation for how they know certain things, but they do." Now, I'm not going to defend that definition, as accurate as it needs to be, and definitely could be improved on, but, it is closer than whatever gobbledygook you spew out here. Honestly, the brainwashing gets more obvious every day. Shameful.
Peace
You need to study on the philosophy of science so you can stop treating it as an infallible God.
@@encouraginglyauthentic43 I don't know what you are talking about, genius. Despite what you think you have interpreted correctly, the only treatment I give science in this comment is to attribute e concept of genius, the subject f the video I'm commenting on, to a scientific theory, written by a scientist, which, the concept would not exist without them. o I don't see how this in any way suggests I am saying science is infallible.
Have you studied the philosophy of science? The results, you can name whatever you like, interpret as you will, and must, but the only science involved is the data, the numbers. There is no lingual Truth in the conclusion, but the Truth lies in the relationships the data shows, which is clear to any sound mind, and, indeed, comes to pass in reality. It's like, you clearly think you are very smart, but, 'stop believing in the infallibility of science...', really, dude? Was the moon trip, satellites, cars, airplanes, farming, Idk, everything, everywhere in life... do you think we do any of that if we didn't understand the infallibility of numbers, math, statistics? C'mon man....
In another thread I'm getting thrashed for attacking science, and pointing out its use in creating dogma, lol, ironic.
Peace
@@blackopal3138 You've already lost. Since science is infallible using it to support your argument for genius is weak.
You'd be better off looking for knowledge systems like the Zettelkasten.
@@encouraginglyauthentic43 I learned a long time ago, I'm better off speaking to people who are not narcissists or just generally batshit crazy. peace
@@blackopal3138 When you can't win the argument you resort to name calling, I don't approve of your tactics.
This is very high quality content. Deserving of way more views and likes.
video made by jealous people for jealous people. Nothing to do with creativity here.
All original sin is being unoriginal. Humans need to copy each other out of envy rather than purity, not affected by any before or after it. Being like God, the Uncaused Cause, immovable by human frailty is real.
If there is no magic in creativity then ai can do it better than humans!
Now with ai art there is no prestige with creation
Who defines work and genues the elites ?
I work to create a total bliss 😊
That's prejudiced thinking other people's ideas are better than others
This is bullying to actual geniuses. A group of people who are more likely to experience deppression because of how different they are to the rest of society.
You dont have to put other down to make you feel better. If havent had an eureka moment, just accept it and move on. You dont have to "demistify it". Its extremely narcissistic to try to deny something just beacuse you dont experienced it.
You are talking about knowledge not genius. Work to gain knowledge and understanding of what is useful then incubate and allow enough of your minds direction to become focused (by effective focusing) on something new and useful with the extra knowledge you have gained by study. The difference between madness and genius is the usefulness (or rather perceived usefulness) of the new recipe with the various groups of information you have learned from others or from observation and experimentation. Insight is not a checklist it is the ability to apply wisdom to ones thoughts and actions helpfully. There is an anti prejudice bias to this video which is un-scientific. Yes a lot of nationalism and racial territoriality and competitiveness has been brought into these sciences of genius, creating biases, but much of those early sciences of genius that were not completely biased by prejudice and fad were on some of the right tracks in refining the art of refinement. I admit that It is also true that genius sometimes occurs outside ideal conditions, (ideal as in the ideal conditions of aristocratic scientists dedicated to the new science who could afford to spend all their time at it) but what knowledge had that being, whose spontaneous genius occurred outside the ideal conditions, observed and what did they focus on in their time thinking subconsciously or otherwise? Work and work ethic is the killer of genius and lifestyle, no matter how many soft cushions you think you need. If only we had better than a monetary system and that we all had the motivation to better the world for all species, not just our own.
A jealous uncreative person made this. This is ridiculous. Lol
Hahaha! You wish! We're just naturally better! Deal with it!
The real, Royal Nobel⚛️Prize is being Noble is the Spiritual Growth evolving Hu-manity towards the🎯 Final Escha-Tone of the✨Trinity of ❤️🩹LOVE=mc2, T'RUTH✡️& BEAUTY 👄, B'right😎Here, N👁️W🗣️🎶!
The Real Gift is Sharing 🙃💭🧃
❤
So there is no subconscious nor conscious mind, there is only a mind that works in different ways and needs some breaks in between that work?