You're Wrong About SCP-682
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- Been wanting to do this one for a while.
Support me via Patreon here: / dcimmerian
Check out the community discord here: / discord
Check me out on the tweeters: / dcimmerian
This work is licensed creative commons 4.0 attribution/share alike.
All SCP wiki works are licensed creative commons 3.0 attribution/share alike.
The image of Doctor Cimmerian was created by Perelka_L.
Channel art was created by TheVolgun
The thumbnail background image for this video is from here: / scp682_by_isismasshiro by the brilliant artist IsisMasshiro.
The full gallery of SCP-682's origin images can be found here: cryptomundo.co...
Let me know what you think about SCP 682, and its impact on the wiki down below.
And check out my patreon here: www.patreon.com/DCimmerian
I think the phrase "must be destroyed" (or some derivative) can be used well, but I think it wasn't used well in 682.
682 can be made very funny in joke posts such as the bestest lizard or in other SCP articles.
@Big Burton same here
682 is one of my favorites because he ia simple but not too simple, it has a lot of early mistakes as it was one of the firsts but all it need is it to be re writen because the idea is great, it isn't a god or world ender, just a dangerous but not too dangerous
good concept, but badly exacuted
Also a fun thing that i tought, what if you were to pick other wikis then make a better vergion of it that dit the current state of scp articles?
@@des9517 my thoughts exactly.
682 is just a prehistoric cetacean that was too angry to go extinct
RB 35-39 BREAKING NEWS: Lizard boy too angry to die!
Must be related to clash
Mary Sue Scp, with MC Plot armor, poorly written due to S1 series having shitty standards lizard. There I fixed your comment.
@@MasterHero10000 who's comment are you "fixing" and why are you so angry. We already were all poking fun at the SCP in this thread lol
@@gman1515 yeah... Seriously. Nobody complains when the "too angry to die" joke is used for Doomguy (although I believe that was the OG use of the joke).
You’ve single handedly removed the phrase “appears to be” from my vocabulary forever
Your vocabulary appears to be anomalously tampered with.
'Appears to be' is good to use when you are using it to state something that appears to be something but there is room to doubt.
Don't use it as an affirmation of what is true.
I think "it appears to hate all life" is not a bad sentence, because you dont know it hates all life, it just appears to, from the limited selection of life you've let it come into contact with
Dr Cimmerian is an anomalous object, we need to contain him.
X in that case I think better phasing is “has so far shown a hatred of all life it has encountered.”
682 can be tamed by a newspaper and a belly rub
shut up bright
Addendum: This was written by bright, DO NOT LISTEN! I REPEAT, DO NOT LISTEN!
Addendum #2: If you want to do something productive, open that portal to summon Doomguy like you promised 6 weeks ago.
Stop telling new researchers things that will get them killed.
Jason .C *gives 682 a newspaper and rubs tummy. And gets eaten... but spit out*
“Liar-“
"SCP vs SCP is really stupid, I don't know who would do such a thing"
Dr Bright: - Allow me to introduce myself.
Get this idiot out of here
Doctor Bright is NOT allowed to use SCPs as "Poke'Mon" in order to "Be the best there ever was."
NO, SCP-999 is NOT a "Ditto" and cannot perform "Copy"
Doctor Bright IS NOT an "Eternally ten year old Japanese boy"
Nor is he "Professor Oak"
Nor is he "Nurse Joy"
Site XX Administrator 05-XX
@@grayeaglej the comedy
It helped with 173 broke 096 bones
it's a crowd pleaser. dragon ball z got popular around the time it introduced a fighting tournament. also having browsed the wiki on occasion in its early days 682 was probably one of the most in depth of the early articles. actually having an extensive research log and a recording of its speech. even if it was a short unlisted youtube video of it saying "they were disgusting" and it gave the story a more singular antagonist. but for such a realistic research organization to basically just take poorly understood physics breaking anomalies and just make them fight each other is kind of simple. aaaand I just realized professor oak heard I wuz talkin shit. but in pokemon it works. they are understood and used in day to day life and enter into battle because they genuinely enjoy tests of power and skill.
"if there's a mascot for the SCP Foundation, it'd be SCP-173, but its likeness is copyrighted so let's just go with the murder lizard"
But then the likeness for _it_ is also technically stolen, so let’s all just.... uh... SCP 999...?
@@twilight3272 brurururururururur
Twilight I’d say 096 is next up
682 is more beaultiful than 173
@@KipTM yes but I think merchandise without a face is a tad difficult
Dr. Cimmerian: Talks about 682; an organism with anomalous properties
Scp 682: anomalously uses gills to filter usable material from liquids
Dr. Cimmerian: lEtS cHaLk iT uP tO mAGiC
Wouldn’t all usable materials be destroyed by the acid before 682 could do anything with them tho?
@Rechordian i always appreciated the articles that had more "hard" science fiction
@@TheJanitorIsIn i liked oh death cause pocket dimensions.
I mean, magic *is* a thing in SCP.
@@femmefuntime acid isnt a magic erasing liquid, its just an acidic medium and matter is dissolved into it and maybe chemically changed to a degree but not destroyed
No-one:
Dr. Cimmerian: y o u a r e w r o n g
You seem upset that suit man insulted your croc
I have only 1 problem with SCP 682, and that’s the “kill this boi immediately” bit.
To contain 682, all they’d have to do is revive Steve Irwin and let him work for the foundation.
@@HerrscherPuppet Himeko Murata, please expect Nine-Tail Fox personnel to arrest you for expressing the secret of Steve Irwin's fake death and current employment at site-19.
Kale Byte I mean....you’re expressing the secret too~
So I guess we’ll be sharing a cell as D-class😆
@@HerrscherPuppet Like we'd remember who we were in there XD
One thing I could never understand is, if 682 is so adaptable, why does the acid still harm it? It should be able, in its next containment breach, to spit streams of acid at the guards!
Haha yeah that has always been my thoughts on the silly acid bath
What's more they specify what type of acid (hydrochloric acid aka stomach acid). Why is it's adaptation apparently is seriously just to regenerate at the same speed the acid dissolves it to cancel it out?
@@philbert85 actually Gastric acid, gastric juice, or stomach acid, is a digestive fluid formed in the stomach and is composed of hydrochloric acid (HCl), potassium chloride (KCl), and sodium chloride (NaCl).
It enjoys sticking around to fight other SCPs.
Because the Tarrasque has resistance to all damage types except for Acid....
I’ve always maintained that 682 has an unknown memetic effect that makes you want to kill it, thus giving it more opportunities to adapt and grow stronger. This adaptation just didn’t account for the foundation keeping it perpetually dunked in acid.
Belisaurius Fish I was actually assuming the same thing actually. 682 may have once been actually harmless and much weaker long ago. But due to an event activating its memetic effect /menacing aura it produces, it forces people to unconsciously induce violence upon it.
I think it would be way more interesting if his rage/hatred of all life stemmed from trauma stemmed from his youth as a whelpling. He hates all life out of fear, as all intelligent life seeks his destruction out of fear. He rampages alone and in utter despair, because it is how he has suffered for millenia.
I think it would be much more interesting if it’s origins were expanded upon the mighty, Tarasque.
Interesting idea.
I would love that added. Maybe only in a specific canon
@@Harbinger_VIII personally like 682 for what he is a unkillable monster that can adapt to anything
@@Harbinger_VII but he doesn’t stay dead like ya he is interesting because of his mysterious origin and ability to never truly die like honestly to me killing him permanently is impossible and honestly 682 can beat or tie with any fictional character as long as they are not truly omnipotent
I feel like SCP-682 is so popular, because of all the supplementary material, rather than the original article itself. People attempting to explain and expand upon this SCP and why it is, what it is. I feel like this SCP deserves a rewrite if only to correct the stuff you pointed out in the article itself, without changing it too much. Maybe more clearly define it as a reptile, rather than reptillian in appearance. I'd also like to see some rewrites for other Series 1 SCP's like SCP-959 and SCP-008.
Its not a reptile, however.
@@danielboatright8887 682 is a reptile
@@noisyash4234 then species of reptile is it smart ass
@@tech_shield6963 Crocodile/Alligator
@@nanuqo2006 it's really not
it "appears" to have a hatred of all life
yeah nah it definitely hates all life
Not 053, the beastie let her draw on it with crayons, hug it and everything.
@@sflaningam7680 as of currently it's still unknown if 682 knows what happens if you harm 053 or not (outside of a tale I probably haven't heard of) but if it does know then that would explain why it just does nothing.
"appears" fits in this situation only because it hates the lives that the foundation has exposed it to.
999 and 053: allow us to introduce ourselves
My new headcannon: Scp 682 is actually a reptilian beluga whale
Finally someone with some sense
Its a rotting beluga whale not reptilian
@@tech_shield6963 well, it's reptilian, and the image is a whale skull IRL
@@nightmare2750 i'm talking about the image
there are prehistoric whales that might be better used for the job, including one that walked "Ambulocetus"
Appears to have a hatred of all life is actually a valid way of phrasing it, since you shouldn't just assume something is true just because the SCP says it is. That isn't enough evidence to be 100% sure, and since there is no good way of testing it, you don't pretend to be sure. The appears to be extremely intelligent part is stupid though, since that would be proven just by it being able to talk.
minecraft; the way home
As zama422 pointed out somewhere in this comment section. "Has so far shown" would have fitted this better. "Appears to be" would better fit something being observe as an inanimate object.
Like looking at a stone that appears to be granite but when dissected and analyzed it would be a whole new type of rock altogether.
Plussies
Paradoxical Equation perfectly put
I Hate Your Dad
Being able to talk doesn’t make you “extremely intelligent”
"Assume something is true just because the SCP says it is" - well actually, you SHOULD believe it in that case. Self-proclamation and designation usually tend to be seen as evidence, unless proven otherwise. If your theory was correct, you could never believe a confession of guilt. (=/= admission. Confession comes of your own accord, admission during questioning). The only instance where you can not believe a confession of guilt is when evidence suggests otherwise, though you will still have to keep the confessor in for further questioning and until all evidence is cleared of error. (See Criminal Procedure for further details)
1:03
It's SCP, not the KKK.
Jesus.
That’s IT!
I’m gonna write a KKK SCP. Nah jk. I’m not a racist scum.
@@FookMi69 why would writing about racism make you racist?
@@serifthegodofinsanity8823 idk but the left think so politics amirite
XD
...
I'm out
I think a better name would be
“The immortal edge lizard”
An immortal nearly unkillable reptile that can come back even if he gets erased while making doomsday's adaption look like child's play.
Some Guy that uses the internet i know. He’s every 12 year olds wet dream.
I find it weird how the reptile is a living no limits falacy, despite the article making it clear it is harmed really bad by the acid, yet according to other sources, not even wiping this thing from existence really works.
Well 343 literally can't perceive 682 (due to the latter "not being one of His") so in His case it does make a degree of sense.
That said I find it odd that 682's reaction to acid is just to heal as quickly as it dissolves. And that of all things a certain crab stuffed mushroom can actually do it in (see SCP-666 1/2-J)
Francisco Alejandro the only thing that can kill it is scp 2935... which is death itself. So to me, if that’s the only thing that can kill it, how can acid harm it?
@@voidy6836 actually it isn't the only thing. There's one other thing that can...a certain crab stuffed mushroom known as SCP-666 1/2-J.
Killing it isn't the same as being able to harm it. Think of Wolverine from X-men. You could in theory keep him at bay by constantly shooting him with machine guns, but that would never permanently kill him. Want to know how to kill 682? Beat him down to 0 hp and then case "wish" on him to remove his regeneration because he's literally a f*cking Tarrasque...
@Rylan H. Mangum yes, but here's why I treat it as legitimate.
While there is no "one true, official canon", I like many others hold that Joke SCPs are still legitimate as long as they meet one of two criteria.
The first is that if it has a main series counterpart, then the -J must hint that it is at least a separate entity from the original (example 049-J) rather than just a straight parody that's clearly the original through a different lense (example 682-J).
The second criteria is that if it doesn't have a main series counterpart, it must be believable, already widely accepted as legit or have a minimum level of professionalism while still being funny. Respective examples for this criteria would be 420-J (already high level marijuana run through The Clockworks on "fine" will do that to you), The Butt Ghost (it does tend to appear in a multitude of otherwise serious stories) and the aforementioned 666 1/2 J (while the objectivity does waver, it does maintain standard format for the most part) as well as 5555-J (which while more of a journal entry does result in a proper SCP, only now we see it being tested on by a doctor on himself).
Examples that don't meet the second criteria: "The Baaaaal!" (Just a tennis ball from the perspective of a dog), 006-J (just ordinary insects and larvae, but with an over exaggerated response from all but a few) and 027-J (a remote that keeps getting lost, likely to really just be due to negligence)
682 is a cool SCP, but the article really needs a few rewrites
He's not cool he's awsome
Love your name Lio!
I normally like your work but you have a bad stumble right out of the gate on this one. You have conspicuously missed a vital piece of context, SCP-682 was the second SCP ever written, so the "must be destroyed" line wasn't a subversion of anything when it was written. and going forward the impression that the "must be destroyed" line belongs to 682 in some way has been much stronger than any tendency to imitate it. anytime a new entry is something more powerful and dangerous 682 as it was written everyone retroactively levels up their image of 682 to justify why it is the only SCP that "must be destroyed"
Was it really the second one? I somewhat doubt that, but alright.
In fact, there are several sources on this forum www.reddit.com/r/SCP/comments/553dvs/does_anyone_know_what_the_second_scp_was/ that dispute that.
@@syweb2 well shit, you're right.
norms29 could you edit or delete this comment then, the op
Scp 529 was the second scp ever written
@@pigpower1189 There really no need to edit or delete it. Someone has corrected him, and he has accepted the correction. And there even a source.
“Fan work”
**Rule 34 scp 682 exist**
Me:Nani
that's why 682 hate everything
Lewding 682 is unacceptable
Only lewd 1471
Why.
[VGB] Orange Juice you deserve to go to a place worse than hell.
Don't forget R34 turned Scp-682 into a anime waifu.
" Scp 682 breaks the mold "
There wasn't a real mold at the time it was written !
How come you be so picky with the work of others and not realise this ?
@samuel olix 14 isn't that many. Not much of a standard to go by.
@samuel olix 14 isn't much, and the majority of the stories were written by randoms on 4chan's paranormal board by amateurs at best. This guy's treating it like a professional wrote it, or that the SPC wiki is anything more than the writing of randos on the net.
@@unclaimedusername6608 SCP?
Because people are still holding it up as fitting the mold better than the stuff thousands of SCPs later. That's the real issue here, not 682 itself.
"its ok to like bad things" ye I mean, we all like you
damn
Ooooooooooooh! Cut him deep with that one!
Epic burn
682 is literally a slightly smarter, (though less interesting and in most cases less powerful) reptilian version of Doomsday lol
682 would end up eating doomsday.
That or doomsday would throw it into the sun, and 682 eats the sun, then the earth.
"less interesting"
How?
@@hugoguzman4985 no reason for his actions, just a general hatred of all life for no apparent reason in the case of 682. Don't get me wrong, Doomsday isn't great in that department either, but he at least has something. Additionally, Doomsday actually dies and comes back to life orders of magnitude more resistant to whatever killed him, which is more interesting and more versatile for storytelling than a high power healing factor imo, and has had more interesting interactions in verse.
@@danielboatright8887 I said Doomsday is usually more powerful because in most depictions he is. 682 is effectively neutralized in a large vat of acid, whilst Doomsday has won fights against planet cracking entities, sometimes several at once, and can gain the powers of those who kill him
Is say Darkseid.
You make good points, though you might be going a little too harsh. 682 was one of the first entries on the wiki, so there wasn't really much to "subvert" as you put it, in terms of the mission, as, from what I've heard, things were still being hammered out in terms of what the mission actually was. This was before the GOC existed as even a concept, leaving the Foundation without something to compare themselves to, in story and writing wise, which is taken for granted. I got into SCP 2 or 3 years ago and thought, "oh, so this who they were talking about at the end of Raiders when they told Indie that they had top men handling the Ark. These are the top men." But that's a modern day observation, taken after the Wiki has had a chance to world build and define the rules. 682 was from the Wild West days of the Wiki, and while it's not perfect, it still draws people in, it certainly grabbed my attention. Yes, the language and grammar could use work, but I find that to be true of a lot of articles, regardless of what series. Do I think it would be better if we saw the actual body count to know just how dangerous 682 is, absolutely. If you want to make a case for termination, numbers don't lie and I'm pretty sure the Shy Guy and the Duke killed less than 682 before getting their execution orders. But what really makes 682 so dangerous is its ability to adapt to survive any danger, no matter how great or ludicrous (for crying out loud, the beast has literal plot armor!). It's the Superman monster Doomsday, only worse since it's intelligent and doesn't have to die in order to adapt itself. Not very original writing, but still a scary concept. So, why do people like 682? Same reason we like Godzilla, I guess. It's mean, intimidating, and a force of primordial animal rage that all of modern man and his hi tech weapons are laid low by. I enjoy that, but I don't want everyone and their cousin trying to make their own Godzilla. It would dilute what's good about it and magnify it's flaws. The same can be said of 682
Word. Also see how he says "you are wrong about x" instead of "x has bad writing/form"? English is not my native language but those are far from each other in meaning I think. I think it's hypocrisy (is that the word? yes it is) criticising an early work of poor writing when one does not even have their terms straight. One is about the subject, the other is about the quality of the article on the subject. As far as I know. Sorry, just still waiting to know what is it we were wrong about.
I’m pretty sure 096 was set to be terminated because there could be images of it out in the sane world without people even knowing. The foundation didn’t want another incident to occur.
I find that even most of the safe scps are more scary and WAY more interesting than this shitty Disney villain of an scp. Fuck 682 and his whole overrated ass. The only scp that gets a pass for a bland article is 173 for being the first one out there. Then again, 173 is still better than 682 even without the title of first.
Kappatalism 682 has some interesting aspects and can be used well in my opinion. Much like Godzilla, it’s about execution of the concept, which can be hit or miss.
I agree that the original article isn’t that good though.
I understand that back in the first series, there was a rule among the writers that you COULDN'T have 682 killed, before the 'no canon' thing firmed up. Basically, the thing keeping it alive is, in fact, explicitly Plot Armor.
Me: "Something: *exists*
Dr. Cimmerian: you are wrong about this."
Dr. Cimmerian: you are wrong about assuming that I will say that you are wrong about anything
Nah you're wrong
I think of SCP 682 as a Gorgonopsid. Inbetween mammal and reptile. Terrifying but in a good way.
Honestly, my head canon on 682 is that it is an immortal kitten with a memetic effect. It convinces observers, even indirect ones, that it is their worst nightmare and about to destroy the world. Really, all those victims died of heart attacks when the kitten tried to play with them, and the memetic effect transferred to make it look like they were butchered by a monster. The cross tests were invented by the meme as background encouraging further attempts at destruction. It seems to feed solely on stupidity, and finds the most reliable source to be scared people with no one to question then.
I never realized how badly I needed this
There’s a termination attempt where they give 682 a dead horse and a baseball bat. 682 beats the horse with the bat. In the notes, it says “Success!” I’m dead serious. And I did genuinely laugh when I saw it.
I feel like this is to harsh on 682. Like yes it is a flawed piece of work but all those flaws lie in how it is written. Flaws in writing that permeated series one, so singling out 682 just seems excessive. Not to mention the concept of a highly intelligent vaguely reptilian entity with highly resistant and adaptable physiology is sure a description of 682, but also kinda sounds like a xenomporph. So saying that 682 is intrinsically bad and should not be a source of inspiration is just wrong, I mean that statement is wrong in general but you get my point.
I think a good assumption for why it’s “Destroy ASAP” protocol exists (not saying this is intent but it’s a way out) is that it’s intelligent, actively trying to kill, but also is able to be destroyed. They can and have destroyed 87% of it before meaning it’s not something they have to just lock away and pray about, but it’s also actively breaching containment and going out solely to kill life. A lot of the dangerous things worse than 682 can’t be killed or destroyed, so you don’t try. A lot of the things that hate people or humanity can’t really do much about it with easy-ish containment. But this? This is something that we can maybe probably kill, that keeps getting out, and only exists to kill us. It’s not a perfect theory but it fits some notes.
I think 682 was the most destructive thing on the wiki at the time, so the destroy at all costs reasoning was justified. Now that more dangerous SCPs have been made since then, 682 was made to seem more powerful than it originally was.
I normally like your videos, but this one just comes off as being the Fun Police.
I feel like maybe this scp, should get rewrite like other popular or older SCP. I’ll be a lot better. And show off great writing too.
naw i watch chuck he does theroies n stuff he explained a lot of stuff so u should watch him to actually know things about scp 682
@@othellobarker1291 Ye no, your obviously not invested in the scp universe.
@Traon Ally a youtuber
7:52
That's actually the most frustrating part of SCP-682 to me. I've seen a ton of artistic interpretations on this thing, and not one of them has stuck in my mind as its "definitive" appearance. Other SCP monsters like the Plague Doctor, the Shy Guy, the Old Man, the Statue, the Possessive Mask and even the Tickle Monster have set-in-stone, easily identifiable physical appearances. But the HTD Reptile? Not so much.
I don't really know why SCP-682 was a big hit. It's just a big dinosaur that likes to eat things and doesn't like being locked up. Wow? Revolutionary?
@Brandon Greenland - Port Credit SS (2272) Wowzi, that sounds actually pretty interesting
The most notable thing about 682 is the long list of attempts to destroy it, which are mostly for comedy factor.
The attempts to use the Sun Launcher on it will always make me laugh.
Because it was one of the originals, ai believe.
@Brandon Greenland - Port Credit SS (2272) think I read that one, it's kinda like bee movie but more bittersweet than honey sweet.
its also the son of the scarlet king get wrecked meaning scp 682 is just a avatar it most likely gets hate of all life from the scarlet king aka scarlet king tried destroying all of creation in a war commanding a army to destroy the tree of knowledge destroyed parts of it but still failed n died was the strongest of the low elder gods but he was more kinda a mid he had 7 sons scp 682 is 1 of them
Man it's almost like the first series was written for fun by a bunch of randos on /x/...
Dr * sends in children to 682 *
Dr clef : uno reverse card
dead meme, brother
@@denpowerdrill8921 has Family Guy used it yet? No? Then it ain't dead yet, it's just senile.
@@lordnul1708 bruh
SCP Tales: *Universe implodes*
"Scp 682 lived and sucker punched god(s) until they made him their god."
Let's face it. 682, 096 and 173 are going to become "good guys" like Gojira, Kong, Rhodan and several other classic movie monsters
I honestly just like reading the tales where they use other SCPs to experiment with him. His reactions are usually hilarious.
If they want it destroyed, use the coffee machine to make "cup of death"
Sven Erik sounds good
Or clone it by asking for a cup of 682, let it regenerate into a second one, then lock them in together and see if they try to kill each other for being living beings. Either they'll never stop, kill the other showing they can die, or, well, now we have two, oops.
@@devincamp8274 I think that aleready happend, like 682 has been [Redacted] in half. Both of these halfs have regenerated, breached and worked toghether. *The power of teamwork!* Then 1 ate another later when they were caught aleready.
@@adamniepowiemtego6011 that's hilarious haha
@@devincamp8274 Imagine if they would want to [Redact] him to small pieces, not just in half. And then
*cough cough*
"The sh*t just got from 0 to 100 real fast"
Mmm, I'm torn on this one. 682 was kind of interesting initially, but then it seems to have opened the gate into dealing with all kinds of cosmic entities and whatnot, which was a bad way to take the premise of the SCP foundation imo. Probably a controversial take given everything on there now, but nevertheless, I feel that a great deal was lost when transitioning from Men in Black to Cosmic Horror.
Like c'mon, just revive Steve Irwin
I like the concept of 682 and it has lots of potential, but also didn't like the writing or excessive use in "pit-fight" type scenarios. The fight with 173 was at least interesting, with 682 adapting more eyes to prevent foundation attempts to blind it.
Bullet proof eyes no less. At that point there wouldn't have been a need for the additional ones.
No matter the fight even Beerus with hakai would lose to 682. That guy can adapt and regenerate from being erased.
682 just has to have a memetic effect that makes people want to try increasingly extravagant ways to kill it once they know it exists.
I love that you’re actively pointing out how bad the “sciencey” writing is. The goal is to give a feeling of cold objectivity but SO MUCH is absolutely non-objective. The “seems to be” example is such a pet peev.
That little reality bender girl could kill him. Just convince her he’s dead.
Then the universe would end.
Max Hamilton I wouldn’t be too sure about that.
@@WhenToastersAttack All life ends if his life does.
682 looks like the page image but with fluffier hair. All the acid does is mess up its glorious, anomalously floating locks
I like how goofy it is. it's an evil murder lizard but also one dude rides it like a horse, another dude takes control of it and eats a dudes legs because he put BBQ sauce on them while the main dude had a giant Hellsing Ultimate style war in his mind, and somebody else gets a miniature dancing version from a magic vending machine.
Dr.Cimmerian : you are wrong
Me: you are right
i always thought 682 was a really strong memetic that made everyone want to kill it, similar to 053, and that’s why the foundation is so deadseat on killing it when containment procedures could’ve been used
It has been explained in scp-6820
Surely if the Foundation were hell bent on the destruction/death of 682 they could just let 049 touch it, his touch kills literally anything as far as I can remember idk maybe he got a nerf so it only works on humanoids
Well there's no way to tell with that because iirc 049 has only used it on humans and 682 could potentially adapt. Never mind what 049 could do to the carcass if it works...
That said SCP-666 1/2-J did succeed in killing it despite the Ethics Committee more or less saying not even it deserves that being used on it (read 666 1/2-J's article, you'll see why).
@@lordnul1708 actually it can kill everything with touch.
@@lordnul1708 "yog sothoth take me now"
049 is in the 682 Termination Log. It didn't work.
My 5th grade English teacher after watching the "appears" part : "FINALLY, A WORTHY OPPONENT"
When your English teacher critiques your SCP Documents
Honestly if we're looking at the practically immortal version of 682, just give it the Ultimate Kars treatment. (Launch it into space to freeze)
Although getting it onto a space craft might present a problem or two.
I like the idea of 682 to a degree, but hell, it’s old. Out with the old, in with the new.
Welcome 682 - A, yup, 682 made a baby somehow
scp-682 is cetacean, not reptilian. That skull is from a beluga whale in decomposition.
But I guess "hard to destroy beluga" wouldn't be as threatening.
Scp 682 vs scp 999 in a arguments plz
it was already done resulted in a containment breach.
682 works as a one of, redactions and all.
The thing people forget about the mindset of many series 1 SCPs is (and yes, slightly my headcanon but I was in some author IRC chats back in the day) that the foundation compartmentalized to a massive degree (thus seemingly silly redactions) but wanted some basic level of knowledge of SCP objects just in case.
As for the must be destroyed bit, its a creature that is next to impossible to keep contained in the long term, eventually it will find a new way out, and lots of people will die when thay hapens.
And yes, many other SCPs will kill even more people if they get loose, but those tend to be more containable where this is just some sapient creature that seemingly (at first) could eventually be killed... then everyone tried, failed, and lots of people died.
I seem to recall an early version of the article (I could easily be misremembering I admit) that made a point of mentioning part of the reason for the destruction order was the belief that eventually acid would stop working on it as well, and it needed to be offed before that one way to contain it stopped working.
Oh, and Doc, your mentions of D class terminations not making sense (mentioning this in a new vid where youre more likely to see) they do if the D class just gets their memory wiped and they get reverted to an earlier point (say, just after their D class training) until such time as their not being wiped proves useful, and they get shuffled around until a scp they can prove useful on is found, or until they die in an experiment, that would also mean a D class only has a month to build and enact an escape plan before poof goes the memory.
@@TheUltraDinoboy "direct physical damage appears to have no effect on SCP-106"
Quoted from the article.
106 has to be contained cause it cant be hurt.
The happy lizard can be hurt, but it just becomes happier and is hurt less by a method the more than method hurts.
Think of 682 like a RPG perk where your damage resistence and health regen goes up the more damage you take, the 'closer' you get to killing it, the more absurd levels of damage output it takes to keep hurting it, and at a certain point it grows a defence to whats being used that renders the attack ineffective.
That combined with its size and desire to kill everything is what makes it a keter threat.
And since it can be hurt, that hints it may be possible to someday kill it, that is why it has a kill order.
Personally I like the CONCEPT of 682, a super-adaptive monster that just wants you dead is a terrifying idea...
But it has to have some kind of caveat other than "Dip it in acid and make sure it doesnt escape" I used to like 682 but it just became lame of how it can't die
"Incase of doubt, feed it to 682"
~Dr.Bright
This seems more like a rant against other peoples fictional stories...it doesn't really present a solution to your supposed issues. Also its not even a cohesive ...what is the point of this video?
Yeah. I think he has written some and he claims they’re good but idk which ones he wrote and therefore I cannot tell if he’s actually a good writer. Also a lot of his problems with SCPs is extremely nit picky bull shit like “don’t use the phrase ‘appears to be,’ its bad and sucks.” Granted, lots of writing, especially in collaborative fiction works are going to have grammatical errors. It’s not like these people are writing novels under a massive publisher, they’re just fans. Like you could enjoy it and suspend a small amount of disbelief or accept that each entry has its own flavor, or you could just talk shit about other writers and their work.
I attribute the mistakes of very old SCP entries to the growing pains of a great work of collaborative fiction, I think it was necessary to achieve what we have now. I agree with some of the things he was but some of it was just judgy bullshit. “Just cause you like something doesn’t mean it’s good” goes both ways.
@@schnoz2372 I would say that good grammar, especially in SCP articles which are supposed to be written in the style of clinical documents, is perhaps the most fundamental thing that a writer has to get right. And it is something that is present in the vast majority of stuff that gets deleted from the wiki fails at. Just having good writing is enough to make many people no-vote instead of downvoting, even if they don't particularly enjoy the article itself. So grammar is extremely important. For me personally, if I read an article which has severe grammatical errors (not small mishaps in clinical tone, but mistakes in basic sentence structure or misspelled words) from the start, that is an immediate downvote, regardless of the article's contents.
And while it's fine if you don't personally agree with all of Cimmerian's points, the fact that he is a pretty successful author with several quite highly rated articles shows that he has at least some understanding of writing for the wiki. And I think that his fundamental point (that SCP-682 should not serve as something that new authors should try to replicate) is very true and something you can see just by looking at the articles that get deleted.
I have to agree considering the first half of the video was literally complaining about the use of the word 'appears.'
I like the tales that hint at SCP 682 being the original sin snakey critter. That's got some depth.
Anyone: Sc....
Dr Cimmerian: WRONG
About the whole DESTROY IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE thing: Its there becuase
1:682 is one of The biggest threats there is to the foundation "But why isnt that on reality benders" because most of them cant even be damaged some cant be contained and also we can contain them mostly becuase Doctor Scranton is a fucking badass
2: The foundation can more or less contain 682 unlike reality benders witch you can throw Scranton reality anchors at them
3: Its big fucking threat because it's sapient and smarter than a lot lf people it can adapt to everything so if you try to kill it too many times it will just become invincible but you cant let it just exist because Well it hates all life and it grows Forever if you let it eat enough stuff basically 682 CAN creat an XK-end of the world scenario it could just keep eating dirt untill it became as big as mountain so yeah it MUST BE KILLED AT ALL COSTS
"Scp 682 appears to be intelligent "
A minute later "scp 682 can talk'
Being can be intelligent without ability to speak though.
I think 682 can be a fun scp when you put him in another room with a different scp like say 096 for example. Most of the time you usually die when facing 096 but because of 682's nature 096 can't kill it so that puts forth the question "what would happen if 096 can't kill his target?" So 682 can be a way to explore those types of questions that and a lot of his termination logs are pretty entertaining.
Is this a critique or is this a grammar lesson?
Doofenshmirts would name you the YOU’REWRONGINATOR
Everybody:This fandom is great
Him: y o u a r e w r o n g a b o u t I t
I think a quick easy fix for a lot of the problems in this entry would be that the SCP has an effect that causes a compulsion to try to destroy it. No matter what anyones ethics are otherwise. This would work out pretty well I think because this SCP has the ability to create permanent adaptations after attempts to kill it. So this would give it a way to become stronger through this effect to cause others to want to kill it.
It would even give credibility to the idea that its able to break containment so often. The foundation keeps trying to kill it even though that goes directly against the foundations own interests and ethics. The SCP wants this to happen and it allows it to adapt and evolve further and allows it to escape easier and new containment protoccols would be needed often.
682 is a avatar of its true form. 682 is also the son of the crimson king.
173 is also a avatar and its true form defeated 682 and his brothers when they tried destroying the world tree (or whatever the tree thing is called).
SCP 999 walks in and tickles them to death
@@l0sts0ul89 scp 999 is also a avatar. and he is also the son of the crimson king. i think stronger than 682 as well. talking about their true forms btw if it wasnt obvious.
I've gotten into thinking of SCP 682 as marvels Hulk. Sometimes its an angry "Smash everything between me and my destination" character. Other times he won't hurt a fly unless its the second Tuesday of the month. It all depends on what the current author using 682 needs for that story. Which is how we end up with Dr. Kondraki using 682 to escape threw site 19 from SCP 083.
If I wanted a grammar lesson I’d go back to school
Maybe SCP-682 isn't the most dangerous anomaly contained but it is incredibly dangerous and hard to contain. Whoever decided to put children in scp 682's sell should be put in scp 682's sell.
Broken characters are usually ●●●● broken
Capt o comment of the year
Phrases like "appears to have" are just examples of good scientific writing and intellectual honesty where certainty is rare and absolutes are not used. In this example the author is open to SCP-682 being deceptive about its hatred (would you trust SCP-682 to be completely honest?), and intelligence is difficult to define. SCP-682 has been shown to be highly adaptive, but whether this is a conscious decision to assist survival or simply an anomalous effect has not been established to my knowledge. In the latter case then its ability to adapt is not directed by intelligence and giving SCP-682 the credit is incorrect, however it would also be wrong, and dangerous, to exclude the possibility of SCP-682 being highly intelligent. The point being that science doesn't deal in absolutes at the best of times, so it is even less likely when we consider anomalous objects and creatures.
A cover story involving a beluga whale carcass was released to the public and all witnesses were amnesticized.
Whale carcasses are to unidentified ocean objects what weather balloons are to unidentified flying objects.
Dr.Cimmerian:your wrong
Everyone: ooh
What really matters is... " do the fans like it ?" If yes don't change it. If no make adjustents.
Maybe some researchers look upon scp-682's file with nostalgia because it was the most dangerous entity at the time.
hes a god. no actually he's the son of the scarlet king. I'm pretty sure he's just trapped in that weak body.
im he’s one of the weakest offsprings of the scarlet king, and considering he’s near indestructible it makes you wonder about the other ones
@@voidy6836 999 like to know your location
Haven’t read 682’s article in forever, so seeing that first line again was pretty eye-opening. I can see why people decided to pair it with 053 since it shares that “must be destroyed at all costs” trait, but as its Anomaly instead of its evaluation.
Kinda makes me want to see a rewrite that hints at 682 having a memetic property that causes everyone to irrationally want to destroy it.
In reality, it could be: 1) cursed with immortality, and desperately trying to find something to end its existence (ie the numerous termination attempts), 2) actually holding no ill-will toward anything, and just wants to escape its tormentors (ie the numerous containment breaches), 3) is cursed with weaponizing/absorbing anything used to kill itself (so even 999 cant help its situation), 4) is actually trying to be friendly, but its anomaly (or alien mind) prevents its interactions from going well (053 having a similar memetic effect could be the first to see it for what it is, with the two anomalies canceling each other out), 5) like Joe-Schmo, his anomaly alters what everyone sees him saying/doing.
So it wasn't big and indestructible after all?
plot armour the ultimate ability
I think it died in some scps.
jellydamgood scp 2935, and that’s all I can recall
Oooh, a fun plot twist idea for SCP-682.... What if it was made to contain an SCP that if destroyed actually would cause the end of the world... (The SCP that SCP-682 was made to protect compels any lifeforms that aren't SCP-682 to destroy it and anything that stands as an obstacle?)
Wow, the Cinema Sins of the SCP universe. Slow claps for you, old chum. Keep it up with the nitpicking.
More like yourscpsucks
You’re wrong about SCP: 682 Cimmerian.
The reason the foundation tries to kill it is stated in the article. The foundation doesn’t have a reliable way to contain it and it breaks out of containment on regular basis. Granted it’s not the most dangerous scp around but it lead to a broken masquerade scenario.
Pretty much the same reason why Shy Guy 096 is also designated for termination, albeit 096 is far more dangerous to the world if it got out.
The real problem with 682 is the cost of recapturing it in its containment breaches. Every time it breaks free and is captured again, the Foundation has to replace a bunch of lost personnel, repair the severely-damaged containment building, foot the bill for all the equipment the MTFs used to incapacitate 682 (Machine guns, ATVs, attack helicopters, missiles and all the requisite supplies aren't cheap), and pay for a bunch of acid and acid-resistant steel to replace the stuff lost in the breach. And as you said, there's no reliable way to prevent these regular breaches.
096, while dangerous, will never breach containment unless the Foundation makes a mistake or is attacked by an outside force. Which is probably why it hasn't had as many resources invested into its termination.
The main problem is another: how do they recapture it? If he has such high adaptability and regeneration that he can sustain 27 continuous hours of battle with 096, no weapon should damage him enough to inhibit and capture
Reptiles are easier to draw
SCP-5000 and why the foundation tried to destroy all life is the answer to SCP-682 anger, it knows something so horrifying to the point the SCP foundation killed all life after discovering it
I'm all for a rebooted 682
SCP-682 is just a tsundere that refuses to be friendly with anyone, what do you mean he only does that with the Slime that makes you happy by tickling you.
I have a new idea for a series “Shooting things with SCP-3108” aka Nerfing Gun it makes things worse well worse in the eyes of the user.
If you mean worse it would make 682 stronger because making it stronger would be considered worse
My headcanon is that this thing has an unconscious psychic effect causing the foundation to try and destroy it, instead of secure contain protect.
I really like the redacted stuff
And at this point it just seems like you want to be different and disprove everyone else...
This isn’t meant mean or so
My SCP head cannon:
the SCP foundation's Records are shared and exist within a multiverse.
As a result SCPs both exist and don't exist all at the same time,
this is due to the fact that the entry is edited across infinite Realities.
From this prospective all fan works a both cannon and non-cannon, since they effectively happen whilst not happening at all.
This also applies to all SCPs since in some realities they are real whilst in others they are merely a entry warped into the data logs due to them existing across the multiverse.
Woah, please stop,too much cryptic shit for me today
Tbh Dr.c i feel as though 682 has been overpowered as time went on even dbz fans fone over it as a reality buster in some stories it can be annoying
Well the main fun is trying to see and think of how it will adapt
Ugh, I bet you're fun at parties. You're taking the Mickey out of it!
You’re taking it way to serious man... I understand being a purist fan of something... But you come off as pretty pretentious....
People like some guilty pleasure material sometimes... Hence SCP-682 v SCP-076...
And fan art, fan film, fan whatever, is exactly that.... its from a fan!! So who cares if they incorporate it into what they are doing or if they draw it to resemble a reptile more then anything else... That’s all they have to go by... it’s literally the only animal that is mentioned regarding its appearance... so what would they have it look like??
Just Bc YOU wouldn’t do something.... Doesn’t mean others should take your advise over what they want to do...
I came here and subscribed Bc I am fairly new to the scp world... but find it fun and interesting and have always been into things like it.... I have learned a few things...
But mostly I am starting to get the impression that you’re a smug, pretentious, purist fan that thinks of fans that are new or into “popular” scps as lesser fans...
It’s obviously fine to have opinions and theories and thoughts about something.... But telling people they are wrong for doing things or believing things you don’t...
Is called being an Elitist.... Think you need to check yourself...
Fans come in all different makes and models man... correcting them on things they actually have wrong... No problem, go nuts... trying to belittle them Bc you feel their actions are beneath you... is sad.
The effects of that coffee cup are great.