A First Look at the AB Night Vision MGA || SHOT Show 2025

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 янв 2025

Комментарии • 20

  • @ericcoates1199
    @ericcoates1199 3 дня назад +3

    I am impressed that you were able to speed up the footage without skewing your voice.

  • @rileyfrench3837
    @rileyfrench3837 3 дня назад

    Thoughts on them moving the retention points off the pods and onto the bridge? I always felt like retention on the pods isn't ideal

  • @CameronLestagez
    @CameronLestagez 3 дня назад +3

    cost?

  • @Kaotix_music
    @Kaotix_music 3 дня назад

    Would be really cool if AB Nightvision followed what LLI did, and offer a powered bridge for two RVM-14s

  • @messagesystem333
    @messagesystem333 2 дня назад

    I want fusion!

  • @cercaz
    @cercaz 3 дня назад +1

    I'm in the market later this year for binos. I'm guessing you'll do a Manticore vs this comparison sometime down the line?

  • @thegolflife7565
    @thegolflife7565 3 дня назад

    I want to see Steele Industries Nighthawk. Although my next Binos will come directly from L3. Just can’t beat the 31 Alphas. Although I do love my DTNVS MG.

    • @coldharboursupply
      @coldharboursupply  3 дня назад +1

      We're working on our Steele video. It should be out soon!

    • @thegolflife7565
      @thegolflife7565 3 дня назад

      @ Sweet! Is it as light as they had hoped?

  • @LernToSpeel
    @LernToSpeel 3 дня назад +10

    It's good because it's boring, ABNV always hits home runs with reliable design without any novelty.

  • @ikemouser2580
    @ikemouser2580 3 дня назад +2

    weight?

    • @coldharboursupply
      @coldharboursupply  3 дня назад +1

      Should be around the same as the original ABNV RMVG-A so around 570 grams / 20oz or so.

  • @kotts9868
    @kotts9868 3 дня назад +2

    where mh1 panos

  • @lawdawg02actual
    @lawdawg02actual 3 дня назад +1

    What we really want is to be able to afford them without selling a kidney.

  • @alamo_night_vision
    @alamo_night_vision 3 дня назад +1

    Exactly what we wanted?? I swear some of the company's are so out of touch. Move the damn retention points to the BRIDGE! then it would be exactly what we wanted.

    • @matthewhefty8619
      @matthewhefty8619 2 дня назад +1

      There's literally nothing wrong with them on the pods

    • @rileyfrench3837
      @rileyfrench3837 2 дня назад

      ​​​@@matthewhefty8619 Except if you want any tension on the retention (to keep the dovetail inside the mount as a failsafe, or to reduce wobble/play in the mount, which is a common practice), the tension translates itself to the articulation. You don't want retention on the pods, otherwise they can move in or out of view unintentionally.

  • @RegimentJoker
    @RegimentJoker День назад

    It's not exactly what we wanted unless it's adorable. How you do a review without a price is beyond me.

    • @coldharboursupply
      @coldharboursupply  День назад +2

      Because it's not a review? But we do think they are adorable.

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 3 дня назад +1

    Meh 😑