WORST and BEST Slot 1 CPU from 1998
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 июл 2024
- Let's go back to 1998 and compare gaming on the worst and best Slot CPU that you could buy!
Consider supporting me on Patreon. Get exclusive early access, behind the scenes, pickups, extended gameplay, first impressions and more: / philscomputerlab
Disclosure: Some links in this description are affiliate links. I receive a small commission when you make a purchase. There are no additional costs to you.
GOG: adtr.co/eqi5mb
Amazon.com: amzn.to/3fvz8sg
AliExpress: s.click.aliexpress.com/e/b6c7Xgiy
eBay US: ebay.us/bKzLAW
ebay UK: ebay.us/Bs9Z0u
eBay Germany: ebay.us/k3bPol
eBay Canada: ebay.us/CD6KZz
eBay Australia: ebay.us/eon4Ys
PayPal donation: www.paypal.me/PhilsComputerLab
StarTech IDE to SATA Adapter: amzn.to/42X0jPO
32GB SSD: amzn.to/3XeoWGe
64GB SSD: amzn.to/43P26az
GOTEK Floppy Emulator: amzn.to/3XnF4VZ
USB to SATA Adapter: amzn.to/43O8jn8
Resources:
www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Inc...
Windows 98 SE ISO (Grab OEM version): winworldpc.com/product/window...
Joseph’s Audigy 2 ZS Drivers for Sound Blaster Live! 2.1: www.philscomputerlab.com/soun...
www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?...
Windows 98 USB Storage Drivers: www.philscomputerlab.com/wind...
DirectX: www.philscomputerlab.com/dire...
Intel Chipset Drivers: www.philscomputerlab.com/inte...
ATI Windows 9x Driver Archive: www.philscomputerlab.com/ati-...
0:00 Introduction
0:34 The two CPUs
1:15 Test system
2:39 Software and settings
3:48 Benchmarks
4:43 Playing Incoming
7:19 Playing Total Annihilation
9:14 Summary and thoughts 
Наука
The i440 is so legendary. Its spirit lives on today in virtual machines due to being the default setting for new x86-64 VMs in Qemu and VMWare. There's probably billions+ of servers out there "running" on the i440 virtual chipset.
Yup, I maintain a 440BX Asus board with dual 800 MHz P-III Coppermine slot-1 CPUs for nostalgic purposes. It's bullet-proof and rock solid, never had a single issue with it, using multiple different vintage operating systems, with dozens of different vintage apps and games.
can run tualatins on it with a bit of tinkering as well - running mine at either 233MHz p2 or a 1.2GHz celeron p3 all just by slotting out the processor :)
Without specifying if you mean the NX, TX, EX, SX BX, GS, GX or even the triton the 440 moniker means nothing but that it has 4 pci slots. and is gen4 of the line. They are not all all the same despite sharing the numbers. The BX and GX was legendary and great, the GS and TX, not so much.
Like! How about a Celeron vs Pentium MMX vs K6-2 video? I think it would be very intereresting since those CPUs were the most popular in 1998. Most people in 1998 had P1 MMX, Celeron and K6-2, the P2 was ridiculously expensive back then.
I remember choosing the k6-2 350 because in Italy a p2-350 was about 1/3 more of the price. Crazy expensive
I remember a while back his K6-3+ video that is able to bridge a lot of performance. You'll get around 450 MHz Pentium speed at the top, but can turn off the cache and reduce the multi in software and get pretty close to 386 speed.
agreed! ♥
I have a couple of those PII 450s running in a Dual Slot motherboard, and they were always fantastic!
Dual Slot even, wonderful!
Wow that board is the perfect balance of old and new ports. APG,PCI and a pair of ISA
There is no APG slot.
@@CougarCat21 1:32 2 ISA slots 5 PCI slots and a APG slot
@@CougarCat21Your correction of typos must make you real fun to be around.
Nothing is more comfy in a little hangover than taking a cold beer and watching a new Phil video.
Absolutely best option for 1998 was Celeron 300a, which you could normally overclock to 450MHz. This overclocked Celeron actually marginally beats 450MHz PII and for the price difference back in the day, there really was nothing beating that humble celly. Back in the day I got my P2 400MHz before the release of 300a and I when I heard of the potential of 300a, I was extremely pissed of what seemed like wasting money on a ”real” P2, which was far better compared to previous Celerons. I took everything back few years ago and OCd 300a on my Abit BH6, so all is well now 🤣
C300a to 450 is like a default, you just set the FSB and it's done. If you don't use SCSI card then go to 112 FSB with /3 ratio to get 504 Mhz is also a no-brainer, it is really a solid puncher.
Celeron 366A was a good option for overcklocking too, perhaps not as fast fsb but it had higher chance to exceed 500mhz.
I overclocked my 300a to 112*4.5=504 MHz and it run fine
Abit BH6 + C300A was so great! When did You get 50% OC before or after? Today we get without extreme cooling what? 5%? World was different back then. Just saying... good times.
Definitely the best option at the time. It had less L2 cache than the P2 (128 vs 512), but the cache ran at full clock speed compared to the half clock L2 cache on the P2. Great at the time!
This system with a Elsa Victory II was my first computer in 1998, when I was 13. It was the most exciting moment in my short life, when i got this. I only left my room for the toilet and food for a whole week!
That's awesome 😎
Man, you was luckiest kid on the planet! I know the feeling, I had exactly the same start in late 90s. Was great period for computer games to be alive
I have that same motherboard. The "LOAD SETUP DEFAULTS" (which is the same as clearing CMOS), set the "IDE HDD Block Mode" as Disabled, with a huge performance impact in Disc Drives. "TURBO DEFAULT" set it to Enabled for faster access.
You should have added a year or two and included the slot 1 Coppermine cpus. I have an Asus P2B-F that started life as a PII-266 in ‘98, then to a PII-400, then to the P3-800/100mhz, all on the same hardware. It just needed a board flash for the Coppermine CPU. 1 gig of RAM and it ran Windows 2000 like a champ. Still have it.
GA6BXDS with two Pentium III 550Mhz and it still running like a charm.
I absolutely love the AOpen AX6BC mainboard. I built my first system around that and a Pentium II - 400Mhz with 256MB RAM initially.
I have several AOpen boards in this series from past adventures and am currently using the AOpen AX6B Pro in my win98 "Hobby PC" because that revision has onboard SCSI.
Rock solid, stable, even all the way to 133MHz FSB. Also works with a Pentium III-1 GHz (my current configuration with a Voodoo2 and GeForce2 GTS card.)
Great test system and hit me right in the nostalgia feels. 🤗
Voodoo=$$$
@@blackterminal Indeed. I got extremely lucky. A friend of mine was going to toss his old computer and I offered to help. This was before Pentiums were considered "retro". I planned to strip it for parts and keep everything except the proprietary stuff.
To my surprise, there was a Voodoo 2 12mb card in there and not much else of interest at the time. I've had that card ever since.
Breakfast with Phil again! In GL Quake I could get a locked 60 FPS with V-Sync on and it was glorious.
Probably the worst CPU would be a WinChip, which was basically an "overclocked" 486 or a MediaGX. If you thought that 30 FPS are bad, see when you go on these monsters.
Totally agree! In late 1998 my office colleague got new PC with IDT Winchip 200MHz and it was really horrible painfull compared to my new Celeron 300MHz (same Covington core as this in Phill test, without L2).
MediaGX was soooooo bad RIP Cyrix
@@honzaplachy5040 I had upgraded my P133 to a WinChip-2 200 in 1998 and it runs fine with my pair of voodoo2. However the non-super7 platform is really a bad choice at that time if you buying a new computer. That’s why I got my C300a platform after doing some part time job during the summer break before I got in college.
IDT Winchip has nothing in common with the Cyrix MediaGX, they're not even made by the same company.
The IDT Winchip was made by a company called Centaur Technology, the Cyrix MediaGX was based on a Cyrix 586, itself a cut down version of the Cyrix 686. All three aforementioned CPUs were actually very good, if you only needed to do integer math. Their bad reputation came from their poor x87 FPUs being slow and terrible for games.
Cyrix's MediaGX lived on long after the demise of Cyrix with AMD, which rebranded it as the Geode. AMD did minor improvements to the Geode and sold them up until I think 2019.
The VIA C3/C7, despite using Cyrix's name had nothing to do with Cyrix. VIA used another core design from Centaur Technology, which they bought along with Cyrix from the ashes of National Semiconductor in the late 90s.
@@GGigabiteM to be very fair, MediaGXm was quite bad as it wasn't also having the L2 cache (like the first Celerons) on the main board and also it has a quite pathetic bus (33 MHz). The cherry on top was just 16 KB cache, which was quite of a downgrade compared to 6x86MX or M2 (which had if I recall right up to 87 MHz bus, 64 L1, and L2 on main board, and in general more executing resources.
The reason why Geode was popular was the low cost of producing them (and MediaGX series in general) given high levels of integration.
If Phil is interested, I am quite skeptical that MediaGx would beat by much a WinChip if winning, but this is mostly because WinChip excluding the pathetic core, had many things on it's side: 66 MHz bus, 64 L1 and mainboard L2 cache.
If I would be to bet, I would still bet on WinChip to be better overall, but by pathetic margins
In 1998 I got a PII 350, 32GB PC-100 SDRAM, 8GB HDD Pre-Built. It came with Sound Blaster compatible sound on the board and built in AGP x2 Rage 128 Pro graphics. I upped it to 512MB PC-100, 20GB Maxtor 7200RPM HDD and a Voodoo 2 3000. I got the base unit from Gateway. It was the first last and only pre-built I have ever purchased. It was an enormous step up from my P233 MMX, So much so I couldn't believe it. GL Quake was amazing. UltraHLE was amazing, really anything I threw at it for the next 2 years was amazing. I recently got a few from a recycler for free, including 2 PII 450s, a PII 350 and one of the odd 66 Mhz FSB PII 366 models. Weird those models. They perform like an un-gimped Celeron. I also received the Celeron you reviewed last video as well as the socketed model from after the PIII launch. I loved that PII 350 so much that after I ordered the parts to build an Athlon system I didn't build it right away. I finished all the games I was playing on my PII 350 before I did. The last game I beat was FFVIII. Then I moved onto the Athlon as Max Payne played ok on the PII 350 but I knew it would scream on the Athlon. I also OCed that PII 350 to 450 Mhz. It was stable and worked fine. I put a larger, faster fan on the CPU box but I don't think it was necessary, just precautionary. At that time I also received a PIII 1 Ghz system as a tip from a customer. Yes, an entire PC, monitor, mouse, keyboard, printer and some extras. He said he was going to put it into the trash otherwise. This was a very wealthy person. I then set up to test all three and concluded the Athlon T-Bird was going to be my battlestation, the PIII was going in the living room and I gave the PII 350 to my adopted son. He needed something to keep him out of trouble and that was the ticket.
Thanks for sharing!
@philscomputerlab It was long, so thank you for taking the time to read it!
@@Trick-Framed I love reading such nuggets of computer experiences 🙂
@@philscomputerlab Me too!
My family also got the PII 350 Gateway tower. That was a sweet computer, unfortunately it died when the house was struck by lightning. It came with a dvd drive and Zork the Grand Inquisitor. I've found another Gateway GP6 and built a dual P3 tualatin into it.
My god I'm so old! I remember when this was new. I paid a fortune on my pentiumII I even got a loan from the bank.
I still Have my slot 1 system packed away. Its and ASUS MB and It had a P2 400 when I got it, but I eventually replaced it with a P3 800, and then overclocked to to become my first 1ghz machine. Still keeping it around incase I want to put together a retro gaming system, still got a stack of my 90s CDs.
My fist PC processor was K6-2 on 360Mhz or something. I played Diablo 1 without problem and I learned the RPGs don't require much recourses.
i sunk countless hours into skirmish on TA commander pack with the classic soundtrack playing in the background on a P2 366 laptop, i dont remember having bad performance issues at 1024x768, good times
If you talk about 1995-2000 hardware I love you
perfect weekend start with a video from phil 🤩👍
@1:25 Viewers should know, that when us older users point at a 440bx chipset, we often point to the south bridge. Probably because it's uncovered, and easily recognizable as the 440bx's side kick to the south. The 440bx chipset is actually the larger chip under the heatsink near the CPU 😊 Phil definitely knows this. I am just poking fun at when we do that. I do it too lol.
You are right 👍
I had Asus P2B with Pentium II 350MHz, then upgraded to P III 450MHz that would OC to over 500 MHz and then got Pentium III 866MHz Coppermine with an Slot 1 adapter. That Asus P2B motherboard was the best I ever had. For storage I had Adaptec 19160 SCSI controller with 3x Quantum 9GB 10k HDDs and Asus Nvidia Riva TNT2 Ultra 32MB. Man, that was some high end stuff at the time.
I love that you use a flight stick to play Incoming. Which, if I hadn't said it before, is a great looking game, especially for it's time.
My first cpu was a i486 DX2 66MHz. When I bought a new computer with a P2 350MHz in 1998 I was highfiving myself with joy.
I absolutely love your voice - I gave up on vintage PC long ago but keep returning to your channel and it has a nostalgic feeling here
Wow, thank you!
Really enjoyed this one Phil! Keep up the great work 👏
The Celeron Covington 266 and 300 mhz actually were nice budget CPUs in early 1998 especially because they overclocked like crazy to FSB 100 and even more. With FSB 100 the 266 mhz version reached 400 mhz and the 300 mhz 450 mhz. At the same frequency the Celeron Covington had a very similar performance to the AMD K6-2 and Pentium 1 MMX (would be nice to see a comparison video Celeron Covington and Mendocino vs AMD K6-2 vs Pentium 1 MMX with a Voodoo 2 or V2 SLI). The Celeron Covington became obsolete just 2 months later when the Celeron Mendocino with 128 mb cache was released.
Many people already explained this in his last video about the Celerons in particular, but they never seem to get any attention unfortunately. I don’t know why he disparages them so harshly, I made a comment about how they made for great 16-bit gamers when paired with early 90s DOS and Windows 3.1 as a budget solution for a mobile laptop capable of such an OS with an active matrix display since they often have a terrible 2D video chip integrated (like a NeoMagic) which, he hearted. That’s how I repurposed an old Gateway Solo 2500 I bought off eBay as untested a few years back
PII 450 was a beast. Nothing but great things for it. When it came out I was still sporting a Cyrix 150 and just drooled over my friends 450.
if im not mistaken chris taylor was part of the team that developed total annihilation , he then around 5 years later developed one of my favorite Action Rpgs of all time Dungeon siege
So great to see this channel keep going! Been here from the beginning.
Awesome! Thank you!
The P2 450, the CPU that has always stayed in my memory as being the first CPU I ever saw that could run Microprose Grand Prix 2 maxed out at a decent frame rate :D
Good Morning. Welcome to Philday. I too have a slot 1 motherboard with i440 I believe.
Hello there!
Oh the PII - one of the few cpus I've kept over the years..... loved using them, loved building with them (was my job for a while), and loved the look of them.
I also dig the slot format and its my favorite of all time. I now have 4 slot 1 cpus!
In the summer of 1998 I had a Pentium II 400 and fortunately it had an open multiplier, ran smoothly for years at 450Mhz with the stock 2V voltage. Even 500MHz (5x multiplier) booted, but unstable, because it was a very early Deschutes stepping. A SL2S7, dA0 stepping, produced in June 98.
Today, It's not so easy to find unlocked Deschute PII CPUs. The original 450s are always locked, in the old SECC1 and newer SECC2 Case, like phils PII 450 in the video.
Those heatsinks are a nightmare to remove. I only did it to one of em I had and broke 2 of the pins things. Placed new thermal paste and decided to not do it to the others I have.
Slot 1 CPUs don't get that hot anyway.
@@TheCrazyparrot8 yeah. Until the CPU fan pins slip out and you don't notice it.
Pentium II 450MHz was so fast in1998 compared with all CPUs available in 1996... Amazing jump from Intel!
Great content and comparison. 👍
Thanks! 👍
I had the Celeron one back in '99 and I was switching to it from a 486 so I didn't even realize it was bad, it actually was an amazing upgrade for me at the time.
Barely managed to get the money for that, the Pentium II would have probably been a fortune back then, no way I could have afforded it anyway.
Very cool! Recently picked up a PIII 500/512/100 slot 1, looking forward to putting the system together!
Only good enough for DOS or early Windows 98 games. For late Windows 98 games you need PIII 750, or better 900-1Ghz.
I have a PII 450 paired with a voodoo 3 in a gateway system that I snagged from a local e-cycler. It's a real blast for retro games, I'm happy I was able to save it.
Keep it up! I have V1-V5 Collection in Original Boxes. And 3 Retro PCs. 233MMX + V1 , P2 450 + V2 Sli, P3 1100 + V5500. Greets from Switzerland
Very nice!
Happy Friday Phil! I have the Pentium II 450 in my Deskpro EN system paired with a Voodoo 3. It’s a great retro system with that CPU.
I have that very same Aopen AX6BC motherboard bough new back in the day. At some point, I upgraded to a socket 370 P3 500 with an adapter slot card, and has been that way since then.
Last year I downgraded the OS in a new drive going to Win98 from the XP that it had for regular use for years and years until recently as I used it to run a serial flash programmer that did not work elsewhere. Love that machine
I believe we had an Dell Dimension running a P2 350 mhz. Later we upgraded with a Geforce 2 mx.
We had that system till we later went for an IBM with a P4, 1,8ghz. We actually got the wrong computer first which had a P4 2,2 ghz. One hour later the delivery guy called and explained the mistake. I was heartbroken 😂🤣
The motherboards I used back in Australia was Octek and Octek graphic cards.
Fab comparison! I love the pII. A dell 266 was the first new machine I bought with money. Would love a 450, think 350 is the fastest one I have.
Got P3 1GHz on MSI BxMaster love it.
in '99 on my bday and in preperation for the start of high school my dad bought me a new PC... PIII 450Mhz with a Voodoo 3. what an incredible era. i had no idea there was a PII 450MHz CPU at the time but was happy with my performance until winXP was anounced and i built a whole new Athlon XP 1700 PC with a Geforce 3 when that came out. I have a large collection of CPUs including PII and PIII 450Mhz, i want to test those two against each other and see how they fair! I have a lot of nostalgia for the Slot 1 platform as it was my most formative gaming years. I have the peak Slot 1 cpu... the PIII 1Ghz as well... what a long lived platform!
Had a P2 450 and that board back in the days ❤
Hi Phil, you did a lot of videos on Mendocino celerons, P2, Durons and Athlons, but I'm waiting for years for a video on Coppermine-128 based celerons. They were also amazing overclockers. Back in the day I had Celeron 566 on MSI BX Master mobo (with adapter) and not only it easily did 850 MHz (50% OC), but I used it on 952 MHz for everyday use, it could boot non-stable at 1050 MHz, and I think it was stable at 1030 MHz or something with voltage boost. But as I said I used it everyday on 952 MHz with no voltage boost. I know Duron was a little bit better, but I enjoyed my coppermine-128 Celeron so much. Phil, maybe you can make a video on some of these?
Coppermine Celerons are terrible. 566 will easily overclock to 850, but its performance will be approximately of PIII 700. 1Ghz Coppermine Celeron is about as fast as PIII 750. Given low prices of PIII CPUs, it's a waste of time to consider Celerons. I have plenty of them and only use them to test unknown boards. Either 1Ghz or 900 Mhz PIII should be used depending on whether the board is stable at 133Mhz FSB.
@@Alex-df4ltthey are not terrible. Only difference is 128kb cache. For non cache sensitive applications and at the same clockspeeds they perform %90 fast as pentium iii’s.
@@mtunayucer Nope, they also have lower cache associativity. The result is a terrible CPU even at 100Mhz FSB. I have tested 950-1000Ghz Celeron and PIII at various frequencies therefore I know they are a waste of time. Lot of heat for poor performance.
I had a bad PIII 850 back in the day. It took a long time to discover it couldn't run at stock, untill I dropped it to 566mhz.
@@wag-on maybe mobo gave a lower voltage than supposed to
I remember back in the day having the celly 300a to 450 was like a minor diff. vs the p2 450. Like 1 a 2 % maybe? But the celly felt smoother in games.
Its cuz of the full speed l2 cache I started to try out the AMD Duron. Instead of the older slot 1 pentium 3 with also slower l2 cache. Never regreted it.
PCChips sold the Celeron 266 Covington in a "Pentium II" labeled SECC enclosure hehe. I got pics of this CPU somewhere. Too bad cant attach them here. PCChips really fooled customers back then.
Nice comparison vid. In fact, the Celeron A series processors were not quite as bad as you might think with the lack of L2 cache. In certain situations, overclocked Celeron A was faster than the equivalent Pentium 2. example: Celeron A 300 was able to use 100mhz bus speed at full speed while the 300mhz Pentium 2 was running at half speed because of limitations. In this situation, overclocked Celeron is faster, in heavy calculations Pentium 2 wins, but in game use Celeron was favorite of enthusiasts. :)
My personal favorite of Slot 1 platform was 350mhz Pentium 2
This appears to be the case because the Pentium has longer pipelines than the celerons. This is also true between high end P3s and early P4s, again its pipeline length. This means early P4s make rather decent budget retro machines but little else. Athlons make better 98 machines if you want to go higher end. Particularly socket 754 or 939.
Good video. Love the slot one platform. Later the flip chip p3 with a socket 370 to slot one adapter for as awesome.
In just one year your computer was not that great anymore, crazy times
Yes exactly! Nothing like these days...
and they were relatively so much more expensive!
You reminded me to make a list of all my SLOT 1 cpus, and beside of two PII450s there was a unknown Pentium labeled one and when i dissasembled the cooler it was actualy a Celeron 300A. Label is glued over the hologram and looks like it was cut out of a magazine. That sticker boosted the performance by quite a bit probably.
The Celeron 266 was still faster than my Pentium 200 MMX. P2s came out 3 months after my dad bought the MMX and my heart was broken 🤣😭
First computer I every built from nothing was a PII 300 MMX circa 2000. I loved that system. I wish I could find one now and all the classic games I had like Warcraft, Diablo, Journeyman Project, Destruction Derby, Road Rash.
Phil can always surprise us with a game I never ever heard of like Incoming :D
The Celeron line was both the worst and best on Slot 1 motherboards - the Celeron 266 was VERY slow, but the 300A could overclock like a champ to 450 MHz with a 100 MHz FSB, and could be unlocked easily : if the motherboard didn't allow you to neutralize pin 21in BIOS, a little bit of electric tape would work as well.
At 450 MHz, the smaller but much faster L2 cache of the 300A would make it faster than the PII 450 in some cases for less than half the price. The Abit BH6 motherboard was legendary for that.
On my slot 1 system, i have a p3 850. For what i play i just turn off the cache and run at 66fsb (566mhz) as needed.
I have a p2 233 to swap as needed. It runs at 300mhz pretty well. Ive also get it to underclock at 133 mhz
Some Slot 1 motherboards have jumper switches that allow some Pentium II processors (all Klamath and some others that have unlocked multipliers) to be underclocked to as low as 133mhz w/L2 cache disabled or 166 and up w/L2 enabled. Makes for interesting DOS build possibilities.
My very first tower PC was a hand-me-down from my Dad. It had a Pentium Pro 200Mhz, with a 1MB L2 cache. Running Windows 2000 Professional on an Intel motherboard. I think it had a 256MB GPU in it. But I could be wrong on the GPU. I used that PC for many years. From what he told me, it was very expensive at the time he built it. Several thousand dollars for the whole setup.
I use the P2-450 in one of my Retro Machines together with Rendition Verite V2200, PowerVR and Voodoo Graphics and Sound Blaster 16. All combined on the P2B-B Baby AT mainboard. The Tower I use is the one which had my Pentium 100 in it back in the day with V1 and later V3 and Pentium 200. The system as it is now is near noiseless with CF-Card as harddrive. I modified the Tower with better airflow and additional 80mm fan. The CPU is cooled by two 50mm fans which run on low RPM. The complete System runs very smooth and can handle a lot of games with the different APIs. This is my favorite Retrosystem beside my Voodoo 5 1400 Tualatin System.
Wait. There is a Pentium TWO? I need to upgrade from my Socket 7 daily driver now!
@@vardekpetrovic9716 O_O Time to head to Future Shop or CompUSA to pick these up right away!
An interesting video might be comparing the first Slot A processors (Athlon 'Argon' 250nm/'Pluto' 180nm/'Orion' 180nm) vs full speed cache 'Thunderbird' 180nm cores. Of course Slot A stuff is kinda rare in the retro scene.
A showdown between Slot A Athlons and Pentium 3 'Coppermine' might be pretty cool though, there was much arguing in 1999 if the first Athlon's asymmetric cache frequencies made it worse than Coppermine.
Not quite a 450 but back in 1998 I had a PII 350 coupled with dual Voodoo 2 SLI on an Intel 440 board. It was the best of gaming times.
The following year I naively purchased a PIII 800 (coppermine) as an upgrade but couldn't get it to work on the 440 and had to replace the board that had a VIA chipset. I recall being disappointed that gaming performance was only marginally better than the old 350 even though the clock speed was more than double.
VIA chipset likely to blame as the 800 is quite a bit faster.
The PII 450 is my all time favourite retro CPU! I’m lucky enough to have a full case version of it in my collection along with a couple of the open case like your 450 in the 400MHz version.
I used to have the full case one on a Abit BH6 with 384MB PC-100.
Same. Big nostalgia for this CPU. I have two machines running it, one dual CPU. (I also have a four-way 450 Mhz Drake Xeon rig).
Why do some only have half the case?
@@blackterminal not really sure. Might have been production cost efficiency related (less plastic etc.)
When i upgraded my Pentium 120Mhz to my Pentium II 233Mhz @266Mhz, most of my my friends was marking me, as the brought the Celeron 266MHz, @300-350MHz. Their funny remarks, stopped, when the power was revealed. Let's say. Myne was a little faster, when we began to compiling code (C++).
I was always fond of the slot 1 cpu's it was the time when games came out and that supported mmx and 3d accelerators were getting more utilitized and making actual use of it
Similar enough: I have a Pentium III 450MHz in a 440BX system. Without any charts I remember first using a Pentium II 333MHz(?) and the upgrade probably felt more significant than it actually was.
Nice video btw! 👍
I have a Dell XPS 440BX myself. I have a P3 700MHz in it, and 1GHz ones are like $10 go get one if you need more performance.
I remember ordering a pII 400 that was the fastest and the next month the 450 came out. I felt betrayed.. lol.. back then there was very little news/information as far as when or what was coming out next compared to todays updates via media outlets.
1998 i had P-II 333mhz Katmai Core, with Asus P2B-B BX440 chipset, but AT Style motherboard, from 2003 till today i never saw one again...
Great video. I think I need to find a new Slot 1 board. Mine is getting very sketchy. I probably should have a go at re-capping it even though they look fine.
TA is such a great RTS.
Have you ever made a comparison video between a Celeron 300A (overclocked or not) and a Pentium II?
I like the Slot1 form, it looks so different and our first PC had/has a Slot1 CPU so that's why I'm so fond of this type.
Yes there is a video on the Celeron 300A.
Cool! I just uploaded a video Reviewing a Premio Pc with a pentium II 300. Should be a bit worse than this one, but it's issue in the moment is the video card it came with, an ATI Rage IIc, which will be upgraded in the next video featuring the Premio. Nice video, thanks Phil.
I have fond memories of my PII 300 back in the day.
I am pretty sure I have the Pentium ll and a motherboard for it here. Makes me want to dig it out and play with it some. Thank you for another amazing video.
Go for it!
Back in the days I used to have a P2 233... While it was the smallest one, and usually is never talked about. I think it was also one of the greatest CPUs of that line. It was affordable and overclockable. Had it running stable at 291 MHz all the time and it even went higher, if I remember it correctly, but with diminishing returns. Anyhow, what an interesting CPU-Format it was.
I just dug through my collection, and found I own a slotted P2 400MHz! I'm extremely happy to know I own a high end P2. I have a whole bunch of P2 and P3 era socketed celerons but I currently have an XPS build with a P3 700MHz and a voodoo 3 in it, and an HP slimline with a P3 900MHz and intel extreme graphics but I'd like to add a PCI gpu to it.
I'm learning so much about hardware from my childhood here and Pixel Pipes.
I used to love a dual P3 system I had growing up, please build one!
Celerons without Cache were nice for overclocking. If you were on a budget, that was a good option back then. Buy a Celeron 266 on a decent board, set it to 100x3,5.
P2/450 is pretty hard to find, yes, but P3/450 is a good alternative and can be still found relatively easy.
Yes they are basically identical in performance!
@@philscomputerlab The only notable difference is P3 has SSE instructions. The rest is pretty much the same.
@@PhilipPetev Ah yes I forgot about that. I don't think it matters much for the retro gaming actually but maybe for someone that want to do semi modern tasks...
Yeah i stopped hunting for p2 450. Now i have p2 400 and p3 450 :D
Note that Coppermines run cooler than Katmais of the same frequency. This is good for hardware preservation.
Back in the day, I replaced my Pentium II 300 with a Celeron 400. Celery for the win.
back then using two Slotket's on a dual CPU Slot 1 motherboard I was able to put two Celeron 533 (or maybe it was Celeron 500) in dual processor mode. I still have that computer in a closet. I used a dual boot Win98\Win2000 setup on that machine.
your work is true my friend phils :)❣
Wow, thank you
I'm so tempted to buy a Slot 1 board so I can compare my socket 8 pentium 2 overdrive to some real pentium 2s. Maybe one day I'll pull the trigger. Very cool video.
The late 90s was such a good time for innovation in the 3d accelerator and CPU space. .
Very nice video again, Phil. For next Winters gaming would u pair a Pentium 4 3,2 ht or a Sempron 3000+ with a Radeon 2600 pro? I like socket 1. Actually i have a lot of hardware from that time.
I had a Celeron 300 66fsb, changed the fsb in the bios and boom 450mhz with 100fsb. Never had any problems with it. I never had the money for a PII/PIII slot 1 cpu back then.
Ooooh. I have two PII 450s...I had no idea they were worth anything lol
I have never ever even SEEN one! The best I've ever had was a 400Mhz. I guess they're pretty rare now.
Yes as it's the highest model they are collectibles.
we went from a 386dx 40mh streight to a p3 - 550mhz.
Interesting. I was wonder why I did not have any experience with Slot 1 and P2. I only used Socket 7 and Socket 370 later then. I remember I used K6 and Celeron 833Mhz.
I just checked which slot 1 CPUs I own, for now I found 2 CPUs and one of them is a Pentium 3 450MHZ.
The Model is:
450/512/100/2.0V S1 and it's an SL35D
The other one is a Pentium 2 233 Model Nr. SL2HF.
I will check my stash, maybe I also have a P2 450 somewhere.
For 440LX based systems however, you can't go wrong with a Celeron 500 or 433 (actual slot version is difficult to find) in a slotket. The 500 has extremely similar performance to my Celeron "450"A on my 440BX board (I won't use it in a main build due to the floppy controller only supporting a single drive).
In my case getting the slotket made perfect sense as I had both Celeron sitting around from the heap of parts my aunt gave me, and amongst said parts was a stock S370 Celeron cooler.
I have a p2 450 but it's one of those oem ones that just have a heatsink. I've cable tied 120mm case fans to it but it's insanely loud. I don't pull it out of the box much 😆
Now you have to do comparisson with the Celeron 300a (standard and oveclocked)... I sold my PII 350MHz to get a 300a and it was awesome.
Total Annihilation is a skewed result. Unless you get the community rip, with bug fixes, you'll get that lag from even newer hardware. If you run the bug fixed community rip version, it should run smoother, even on a K6-II 500 or PIII 500.
Wow, my first Slot 1 motherboard was this AOpen but with Celeron 400A))))
I'm a fan of the ol' Celeron 300A, true it only had one quarter the L2 cache of the rest of the slot 1 Pentium 2's, but the 300A's cache ran at full cpu speed and was amazingly overclockable too. A bargain priced giant-killer for sure