As some have pointed out I forgot to include Fujifilm lenses to my list. That was by mistake, and there are fuji lenses that are suitable for astro. Instead of taking down the video and re-uploading it with those lenses I will add them here and on the article found on my website. Here are three native Fuji lenses that are suitable for astro: Fujifilm XF 14mm f2.8 R Fujifilm XF 18mm f2.0 R Fujifilm XF 23mm f1.4 R All the DSLR-mounted APS-C lenses can also be adapted for Fuji along with the DSLR-mounted full-frame lenses. Some have also asked for Pentax lenses, and I will add those to my website article.
this is a lovely list. you are the only one who focuses on a specific piece of equipment instead of dabbling with everything . Could we have a review of tilf shit lenses , please. many thanks
Your use of graphics is so interesting and helpful. Too many reviewers spit out countless numbers to compare, but expect us to remember the numbers or write them down.
Super clean video, well edited, and perfect script. I watch a lot of RUclips, and I’m proud to say this is one of the finer productions on this platform, well done.
Just started a job at NASA! As you do! You can be excused for not making as many videos as you'd hoped. Quality over quantity every day! Your videos are super slick and verry clean. Keep up the good work!
I've just stumbled across this channel whilst looking for content for new Photographers. It's mustard, really useful information, pitched in a very easy to understand way, many thanks, good luck in the new job! I'm subscribed and working my way through the videos.
The Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 looks good for astro, I'm surprised I didn't notice it when I put together this article. Here is a pretty good review of the lens I found: phillipreeve.net/blog/review-tamron-17-28mm-f-2-8-di-iii-rxd/#Coma_correction. Compared to the Laowa 15mm f2 the coma is noticeably better and at all focal lengths at f2.8 the coma never reaches any serious levels. The correction is not perfect but it should be acceptable for most people. Sharpness is very good wide open at 17mm through the whole frame, but corner sharpness falls off a bit as focal length increases, but never to alarming levels - again the performance is acceptable. Chromatic aberrations are also visible but again nothing to worry about.
Thank you for your response! This is just great quality content! Hoping to see more such videos! The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 fits really well for me to shoot other genre of photography, but I am really keen on understanding and capturing the sky/stars! After this review, it's much more easier for me to make the purchase decision! Thanks again!😊
This video was really well produced! As a beginner for astro, the graphics and concise points really helped narrow down buying options. Thank you. Definitely hit the subscribe button.
i've watched this video a bunch of times for the great content, but just noticing how helpful the dots are this time around to be able to just glance over for my color and you not to have to go into it for each lens. great idea:)
The Nikon Z 20mm f1.8s has horrible coma wide open. The Nikon Z 24mm f1.8s shows a better performance but the coma is still noticeable even after stopping down 1 EV. The same can be said for the Nikon Z 35mm f1.8s and the Nikon Z 50mm f1.8s. The Nikon Z 14-24mm f2.8 seems like it might be a good option, unfortunately I didn't see this lens when I was doing research for the guide. The Nikon Z 24-70mm f2.8s seems good for astro especially at the longer focal lengths, however, aberrations are still present wide open (3/5).
@@Apalapse I have a Nikon Z 24-70 f2.8s, when you say it is especially good at longer focal lengths, are you referring to 50mm+ ? And when you say aberrations are present wide open, are you suggesting to use f5.6 and higher, or do you just mean that there will always be aberrations present? Thank you for your help
Hi Thanks a lot for the complete review. at 7:52 you say Sigma 24mm f1.4 that you mentioned earlier, however you mentioned the 20mm not the 24. Do you have the same conclusion on both regarding coma? Thanks again
First, here is a good review of the 24mm: www.lenstip.com/430.1-Lens_review-Sigma_A_24_mm_f_1.4_DG_HSM.html and here is a good review of the 20mm: www.lenstip.com/457.1-Lens_review-Sigma_A_20_mm_f_1.4_DG_HSM_Introduction.html. Coma is huge on both lenses and I do not recommend them for astro, but the 24mm is worse overall.
Have you ever tested or heard of the lenses below? 1. Sony 35mm f1.4 GM 2. Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG DN (latest version) (I guess it's 'DG HSM' you introduced in the video) 3. Sony ZEISS Sonnar T* 55mm F1.8 ZA 4. Tamron SP 24-70mm F2.8 Di VC USD G2
This (and your previous review of astrophotography lenses) was incredibly comprehensive and useful! Thank you for what must have been and enormous amount of work to produce these. I'm not sure if this is your 'thing', but do you plan to do a review of telephoto lenses for deep sky astrophotography? I'd really love to see a review like that on your great channel. Thanks so much again for all the work you put into your content here and on your Web site! Keep up the amazing work.
great video, thank you. Maybe someone else has already posted this question: why not including the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye Pro that I own and use for milky way photography?
I have heard the RF 15-35mm f2.8 is great for astro, with virtually no coma/astigmatism wide open. See this review: www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-15-35mm-F2.8-L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx. The RF 24-70mm seems to have good performance. See this review: www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-24-70mm-F2.8-L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx
Great video! Really curious why you left the Sigma 16mm f1.4 off the apsc list. It's quite a terrific lens for astro, albeit not the widest focal length.
For Sony, now you have 50F1.2GM and 14F1.8GM. You can try them and maybe you can forget about the RF50F1.2 since you are a Sony user. Thanks for the comprehensive comparison and comments! Appreciate the effort.
hi! Do you have any plans to make an updated version of this video? I am looking to buy a 35mm for astro (Nikon Z8 camera) and am trying to decide between the Nikon 35mm f1.8 S (mirrorless) lens and the Tamron 35mm f1.4 on the FTZ adapter. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
Your vids are really awesome, but you should title this more appropriately for Sony. Nikons z lenses are outstanding for Astro. Fuji’s 8-16 is incredible and Fuji’s 16 f1.4 is awesome when stopped down to 2.2 and higher.
I do admit I was a little more biased towards Sony lenses in this guide, so I'm making an effort to include more Nikon Z and Fujifilm X lenses on my website article.
11:40 Ooph! Bit of an error there? Talking about the Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L, shows the Sigma 50mm 1.4 ART and uses the same 'other thoughts'. Performance is 5/5 for all categories? But this is that expensive portrait lens?
What about the new Sigma 14-24 2.8 DG DN? Curious if you have had a chance to test that yet. Deciding between that and Sony 15-35 2.8 to bring with me on my next astro trip.
I haven't seen anything from his social media since a year ago and from what I've seen no archives of the site exists. I wish I could find more info but unfortunately it's looking grim
Great to hear! That means a lot since I try to communicate everything with simple illustrations that transcend any single language. Thanks for watching!
I feel so much thankful for this video. I'm using this video for choosing which lens to buy for my first purchasing for both astro & daily lens and I really x 999 want to say thank you for all those info you're sharing with people around the world. Thanks again and I truly wish the best for your health in this horrible chaos _ from a happy South Korean 😄
thanks for sharing your experience and opinion, I would like you to help me, I currently own a sigma 16mm 1.4 and I have the possibility to buy used a sony FE12-24 mm F4g, is it recommendable for astrophotography or better the rokinon 24mm F1.8, Thanks for the help, greetings.🤝🙂
Thanks for the survey. Just a suggestion - Some of the photos of lenses in the video don’t match the text so it’s sometimes not clear what lens you are actually talking about. Also, I suspect most nightscapers would take exception to you disparaging their favourite Nikon 14-24mm zoom for DSLRs 😉. It’s been used to take more classic nightscape images than most of the lenses on your recommended list. The new Z mount version is better but that’s true of most of the new mirrorless lenses outperforming the older DSLR versions of the lenses.
Basically no Nikkor primes -- please explain why (surprised not seeing your ratings for those lenses that you say "don't buy"). The lenses reviewed also exclude older, manual focus lenses. There are some f/0.95-1.2 MF lenses that might be worth mentioning.
This voice is so sastified... Also which lens should I buy over the other: Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 Macro ‘Contemporary’ or Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8? I have a Canon M6 Mark II w/15-45 Canon EOS-M kit lens. My usage are for amateur filming, travelling many times in a year ( usually long trip ) and landscape (portrait) photography w/ basic family shooting. In my opinion, I feel the extra reach and the ‘macro’ focusing of the Sigma 17-70mm are better for me. I’m planning to shoot some Aurora Borealis and for all-time using. I’m just learning videography and photography. Please help ASAP. Wish you the best. :)
I think you hit the nail on the head. The reach from the 17-70mm will give you a better focal length for portraits and other travel settings. I have been traveling quite a bit this year and I am using a 20mm and 85mm and I always wish I had something LONGER than an 85! 70mm will give you ~150mm equivalent field of view on the M6 which is a great documentary/journalism/portrait focal length. At 17mm and f2.8 you will be in a good spot for aurora photography or any type of astro. Plus, the macro abilities of the 17-70mm will be great for close-up portraits or macro photography in general.
@@huunamnguyen4397 I don't think an adapter should affect optical performance, although for autofocus, the cheaper adapters won't perform as well. I would watch RUclips reviews comparing a bunch of options since I can't recommend one personally; I'm only familiar with Sony E-mount adapters since that's the camera system I use.
I think it is time for another update to this video. I need a new lens, possibly two after watching this. I'm shooting A7Rii with Sigma 24/1.4 HSM Art, A6500 with Rokinon 12/2. I recently added an A9ii to the family so I'd like to add another FF astro lens to the family as well. Since this video came out ........Sigma 14-24/2,8 DG DN Art (DN signifies mirrorless), Sigma 20/1.4 DG DN Art, Sigma 24/1.4 DG DN Art, Sony 12-24/2.8 and the one I'm leaning hardest toward the Sony 14/1.8. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
really like that last timelapse with the traffic lights underneath the valley clouds very nice work I concur on the sony 20mm got this one awhile back and absolutely love it for astro work. really looking forward to the just released sony 14mm1.8 I hope its as nice for astro as the 20 and 24
Great video. So the Sony 16-35 2.8 is good enough? I will buy that lens as I need it for landscape and I’d rather not buy a super specialised lens I’ve noticed you didn’t include the Sony 12-24?
I’m so curious what would you say about the new Sigma 35mm DG DN lens on a Sony camera. Great video, I think it helps many people to choose wisely. Thanks!
I've got the Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, it's great for the crop cameras. It also can be used on a fullframe at 16 mm, but the corners become VERY blurry... though not so bad for reports, weddings, etc.
The Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM is one i would avoid. Coma and Astigmatism even in the center make bright stars look like artificial galaxies. However i own it and since its my widest lens below f/4 i occasionally use it because the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG is just very tight for astro (but then again really nice performing like Apalapse said @11:31)
Thanks for the comment. One thing that I missed in the video was to add the dots for the fuji mounts in the APS-C lens category, and I did, admittely forget to provide any native Fuji lenses. I'm going to make a pinned comment to address this.
@@Apalapse that would be appreciated. A great video by the way, it's very helpful. I used to shoot with Sony but thought I'd give Fuji a try and really enjoying the 16-55 red badge lens.
Thank you for the very informative and helpful video. I own a Tamron 17-35mm F/2.8-4 (A037) and use it on a Canon R6. It is great for landscape photography and I would like to know if it is also suitable for astrophotography or if I should buy a fixed focal length. Thanks in advance for your opinion.
What is your honest opinion on the canon 16-35 L f2.8 for astrophotography? Does it perform well or does it fall into the not reccomended category like the other l series lenses in the video?
www.astropix.com/html/i_astrop/eq_tests/16-35.html this review has some pretty good samples of coma and asigmatism wide open at f/2.8. As you can see the performance is just okay - I think you can find better at the same price.
Hello, I'm sorry for my English, I'm looking to see if I bought the "Sigma 20mm 1.4 ART" I have a "canon 6d mark ii", and I didn't understand exactly when you indicated that it is not recommended to buy it, if we don't have any accessories?
Hi Vincent, I was wondering if you could give me your thoughts on Soviet MTO mirror lenses for Astrophotography. I can buy a 500mm f/8 mirror by MTO for $200 or so, and I'm tempted because they basically look like mini-Maksutovs, which I know make sharp images when used as telescopes
I have a Samyang (Rokinon) 24mm T1.5. I tried using it for astrophotography earlier, and at the widest aperture I would give that a 3/5 overall as well.
Thanks for the comment! I have not personally tried the Samyang 20 mm f1.8. I googled the lens and found some reviews, though, and here's what I can say: The lens has exceptional center sharpness and good corner sharpness all the way from f1.8. Its performance is among the best lenses. Chromatic aberration is very low in the frame center but fringing is seen in the edges. This can be corrected with software. I give sharpness a 4/5 and chromatic aberration a 4/5. Coma is seen in the extreme edges but it's not pronounced. I give this a 3/5. Ovearll I think the lens would be a good option for astro! Here are some of the reviews I found: ePhotozine: www.ephotozine.com/article/samyang-20mm-f-1-8-ed-as-umc-review-30094#:~:text=The%20central%20performance%20of%20the,result%20is%20still%20very%20good. gippslandimages: www.gippslandimages.com.au/samyang-20mm-f1-8-ed-umc-wide-angle-lens-2/#:~:text=Conclusion.-,The%20Samyang%2020mm%20f1.,subjects%20and%20blur%20away%20backgrounds.
Have you ever tested the Laowa 100mm 2.8 lens for astrophotography? It is a manual focus 2x magnification macro lens that also focuses to infinity. I am considering purchasing the lens for macro images, but if it also produces terrific astro images... well then it is a no brainer for me since I have a wide range of photography interests.
I am a beginner I did Milky Way for a handful of nights on 2020. My setup is not the ideal for this: My video cam Panasonic GH5. 1st I started with the Lumix 12-35mm F2.8. decent for what it is. But then I wanted a Wide Angle lens and bought the Tokina 11-20mm F2.8 with the Speed Booster Viltrox EF-M2 (Which allow aperture down to F2.0 ). I like how much of the Milky Way I am capturing but it came out with a lot of coma. 1st time I used at ISO 2000 / F2.0 / SS 30" and it was a disaster.... 2nd time I used at ISO 2000 / F2.8 / SS 20" and it was better... and 3rd time I used at ISO 2000 / F2.8 / SS 30" and it was not good again.... I was thinking on buying the Rokinon 10mm F2.8 or the Rokinon 12mm F2.0 but now I see your review and I might be the one doing something wrong. Not the Tokina. Do you have any thoughts? Thanks in advance. And thanks for this detailed review, the best I have seen so far.
about to snipe a 40mm f/1.4 art on eBay since I saw great reviews and apparently it can just be used wide open lol. the 24mm rokinon 1.4 I got off amazon was a gem. I must've gotten lucky because it's SO sharp with ZERO CA, coma, astigmatism at f/2.8 on a tracker. really good value
@Apalapse Thanks a lot for the detailed review. Really helpful. I am confused between 11-16, 11-20, 14-20 tokina lens on which one to buy? Appreciate if you can help me here.
Thank you. I'll provide some reviews of those Tokina lenses here: 11-16: www.lenstip.com/379.1-Lens_review-Tokina_AT-X_116_PRO_DX_II_AF_11-16_mm_f_2.8_Introduction.html 11-20: www.lenstip.com/451.4-Lens_review-Tokina_AT-X_PRO_DX_11-20_mm_f_2.8_Image_resolution.html 14-20: www.lenstip.com/470.1-Lens_review-Tokina_AT-X_PRO_SD_14-20_mm_f_2_(IF)_DX-Introduction.html The 11-16 and 11-20 control coma well, the 14-20 controls coma excellently. All are good buys to be honest.
Great review thank you! What about Canon EF 35mm 2.0 IS and RF 35mm 1.8 ? Another video for deep sky would be interesting with 85 100 135 lenses ... if you can obviously ^^
Checking the Canon EF 35mm f2, while it is sharp wide open in the center at the full frame edge at f2 the image quality is weak, which is also evident by high levels of coma (www.lenstip.com/365.7-Lens_review-Canon_EF_35_mm_f_2_IS_USM_Coma__astigmatism_and_bokeh.html). The RF 35mm f1.8 looks to be a bit better but there is still coma present wide open in the corners. In this review, www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/lenses/35mm-f18.htm#coma, I see that on stars the coma isn't too problematic but you can clearly see it on the streetlights. From other tests, the resolution seems pretty good wide open at f1.8 although some reviews mention a "haze" across the entire image frame (not sure what that means). I think this lens would be "okay" for astro, and at $499 it seems like a good deal.
I based that remark on this review I found: www.lenstip.com/574.7-Lens_review-Sigma_A_24-70_mm_f_2.8_DG_DN_Coma__astigmatism_and_bokeh.html which describes the coma as visible, but compared to other lenses this isn't a bad performance. The sharpness at the full-frame edge is just decent (www.lenstip.com/574.4-Lens_review-Sigma_A_24-70_mm_f_2.8_DG_DN_Image_resolution.html).
Hi I was writing to ask for advice on the 15mm f2 laowa,I have been tempted to buy it to get a better width in captures,I do own the tokina firin 20mm f2,would the laowa be any better for captures or would it be better just to stick with the tokina thanks
I was wondering if you've ever tried a catadioptric lens with your camera for astrophotography. On paper, anyway, they seem like an ideal solution for those of use using star trackers with limited payload capacity: smaller and lighter than higher focal length prime telephoto lenses, and able to get to very high focal lengths. Don't see any reviews of them with cameras, though, so I'm a bit skeptical. Just wondering if you've had any experience with them. Thanks!
Currently Canon RF lenses ? Do you have any recommendations, getting into the RF market and looking to give astro a try :). Thanks 14-35 F4 and 24-70 2.8 current lenses but looking at a prime.
I know you made this video a long rime ago but I have a question. What are your thoughts on Sigma 20mm art ? It's more affordable than 14mm and doesn't sound as wide as 28mm. Does it behave well under the night sky?
This has become my go-to guide for astro lens as I'm looking ahead to investing in one. As a Nikon shooter, it does put a little bit of sour taste in my mouth. Can you elaborate on how their prime lens are bad for astro in general? And what would be the very best lens with a native mount for Nikon shooter in your opinion, or do folks like me should just adapt something from Canon/Sony?
I only own the 24mmm 1.4 canon and it's what I have and what i'll use. Sure there are verter ones but if you already hace It you can do much verter t'han without any lens :)
The mk II version still has massive amounts of star-deforming aberrations. See this review: www.lenstip.com/245.7-Lens_review-Canon_EF_24_mm_f_1.4L_II_USM_Coma_and_astigmatism.html
@@Apalapse the plan is to travel to the black Forest in February 2021 - the plan is to shoot the milky way there. A shot that I have in my head for years. Will use the 24mm on the EOS R.will let you know
Awesome video. Very useful. Do you have any idea on the Canon RF 85mm F1.2? Does it perform similarly to the Canon RF 50mm F1.2 for astrophotography? Thanks in advance.
Thanks for an awesome video, it is very informative. I have a Canon EF 16-35 f/4 and the RF 24-70 f/2.8. I'm looking for a UWA for astrophotography. I'm tossing between the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4, Irix 15mm f/2.4 (either Blackstone or Firefly version) and the Rokinon AF 14mm f/2.8 RF mount. Which lens would you recommend? Thanks.
Last summer I used the canon 1.8 for a bit of dabbling in astro, and then I broke it (dropped doh) and been looking at getting a new 50mm to have in general, with eye on the sigma 50 1.4 art and was just thinking to myself, I wonder how good it'd be for Astro as well, sounds like it'd do fantastic. Really wanna step up my Astro game this summer
Would you recommend 14-24mm f 2.8 DG DN Art Lens for Sony full frame cameras for astrophotography/time-lapse? Also could you show a comparison between the differences of shooting with lens with aperture opening of f1.8 vs f2.8. Eagerly waiting for a reply. Thank you!
The 14-24 mm f2.8 Sigma is one of the best full frame lenses ever produced. I'm sad I didn't include it in my review because it is a 5/5 in all categories.
Looking at the chart I can see only one option for Nikon Z mirrorless cameras, is that right? I'm looking for buying a Nikon Z6, any recommendation for this camera?
for me, this tamron 35 f1.4 is a masterpiece, one of the best lenses I've ever had. has TOP characteristics. I've tried a lot of lenses, but I know one thing, I'll never sell this one.
Great comparison! I currently have the option of a second hand 24mm GM (priced around a new 20mm 1.8). It should be my lightweight hiking and astro lens - given your experience, should I go for it or rather take a 20mm 1.8?
I think both of them are pretty much the same in terms of quality. I would go with whatever is the cheaper option. Personally, I enjoy the 20 mm f1.8g since I actually own it, but I used the 24 mm 1.4GM when it was on loan and I loved it!
Hey 👋🏻 loved your video. I have a question. There are two new lenses I saw on the market and I would like to know what do you think about them. The Sony 24mm 2.8 and the samyang 24 mm 1.8(they advertise as a good astro lens) did you hear about them? Or did you test any of them? Thank you
Yes I have heard about these lenses. Here's some info on them. A good technical review of the Sony can be found here: www.lenstip.com/603.1-Lens_review-Sony_FE_24_mm_f_2.8_G_review.html. Aberrations are controlled pretty well in this lens, although it's not entirely perfect. I would give it a 4/5. The samyang performs about the same, maybe a 4.2-4.5/5. Here's a review on that optic: dustinabbott.net/2021/05/samyang-af-24mm-f1-8-review/. I like how they advertise it for astrophotography - very interesting when manufacturers do that.
Watched this video thrice already. I am new to photography, ok with landscape but want to get into Astro. Can you recommend me 1 lens which you will pick any day but is economical. I already have 18-50 f2.8 Sigma. Thanks a lot for this video and have subscribed so that I don't miss out any in the future 🙏
As some have pointed out I forgot to include Fujifilm lenses to my list. That was by mistake, and there are fuji lenses that are suitable for astro. Instead of taking down the video and re-uploading it with those lenses I will add them here and on the article found on my website.
Here are three native Fuji lenses that are suitable for astro:
Fujifilm XF 14mm f2.8 R
Fujifilm XF 18mm f2.0 R
Fujifilm XF 23mm f1.4 R
All the DSLR-mounted APS-C lenses can also be adapted for Fuji along with the DSLR-mounted full-frame lenses.
Some have also asked for Pentax lenses, and I will add those to my website article.
this is a lovely list. you are the only one who focuses on a specific piece of equipment instead of dabbling with everything . Could we have a review of tilf shit lenses , please. many thanks
Tamron 35mm vs sigma 35mm f1.4 which one lens is better?
I have canon 6D mark ii is this camera good for astro photography
U missed the telephone lens for deepsky photography :3
@@junkinkwok1233 This video mainly focused on wide-angle astro. Deep-sky astro could be an entirely separate video ;)
Your use of graphics is so interesting and helpful. Too many reviewers spit out countless numbers to compare, but expect us to remember the numbers or write them down.
Thank you, I appreciate the kind words.
Thanks for the great video... hopefully this helps everyone as well.
[Full Frame:]
(Ultra Wides)
[2:56] SIGMA 14mm F1.8 ART
[3:09] LAOWA 15mm F2 ZERO-D
[3:22] ZEISS BATIS 18mm F2.8
[3:34] ROKINON SP 14mm F2.4 / ROKINON 14mm F2.8
[4:10] IRIX 15mm F2.4
[4:25] LAOWA 12mm F2.8 ZERO-D
[4:48] ROKINON SP 10mm F3.5
[4:53] TAMRON 15-30mm F2.8 / SONY 16-35mm F2.8 GM
[5:15] (LENSES TO AVOID: sony 16-35mm f4; canon 14mm f2.8; nikon 14-24mm f2.8)
(Wide Angles)
[5:47] SONY 20mm F1.8G
[5:50] TOKINA 20mm F2 FIRIN
[6:19] NIKON 20mm F1.8G
[6:39] (LENSES TO AVOID: sigma 20mm f1.4 art)
[6:51] ZEISS LOXIA 21MM F2.8
[7:16] SONY 24mm F1.4
[7:27] ROKINON 24mm F1.4
[7:44] (LENSES TO AVOID: canon 24mm f1.4L ; sigma 24mm f1.4 art; nikon 24mm f1.4g)
[8:06] SONY 28mm F2
[8:11] 7ARTISANS 28mm F1.4
[8:33] SIGMA 28mm F1.4 ART
[8:42] TAMRON 35mm F1.4
[9:10] CANON 35mm F1.4L II
[9:15] SIGMA 35mm F1.4 ART
[9:27] SIGMA 35mm F1.2 ART
[10:16] ROKINON 35mm F1.4
[10:27] (LENSES TO AVOID: nikon 35mm f1.4 g)
[10:44] SIGMA 40mm F1.4 ART
[11:05] TAMRON 45mm F1.8
(Standards)
[11:22] SONY PLANAR T 50mm F1.4 ZA
[11:30] SIGMA 50mm F1.4 ART
[11:38] CANON RF 50mm F1.2
[11:56] ROKINON 50mm F1.4
[12:03] (SPOTLIGHT: ROKINON SP 50MM F1.2)
[12:29] (LENSES TO AVOID: nikon 50m f1.4 g; canon 50mm f1.2L EF mount)
[12:38] CANON 24-70mm F2.8L II
[12:50] CANON RF 28-70mm F2L
[13:00] SIGMA 24-70mm F2.8 ART
[13:07] TAMRON 28-75mm F2.8
[APS-C]
[13:16] ROKINON 10mm F2.8
[13:20] ROKINON 12mm F2
[13:22] ROKINON 16mm F2
[13:24] ROKINON 21mm F1.4
[13:40] TOKINA 11-16mm F2.8
[13:44] TOKINA 14-20 F2
[13:50] SIGMA 18-35mm F1.8
[MICRO 4/3]
[14:06] OLYMPUS M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 7-14mm F2.8
[14:19] ROKINON 7.5mm F3.5 FISHEYE
[14:28] PANASONIC 12mm F1.4 SUMMILUX
[14:35] PANASONIC LUMIX G 25mm F1.7 ASPH
thanks!
Thankute , bro!
THE RETURN OF THE KING
Hahahaha thank you.
Super clean video, well edited, and perfect script. I watch a lot of RUclips, and I’m proud to say this is one of the finer productions on this platform, well done.
Much appreciated!
Very true
Hey, that was a really good review, well done! Any possibility of doing a similar review for the 70-600mm range of lenses??? Please??
I can definitely do that!
Yes please. Great video style and quality. I was just a bit disappointed when I realised it ended at 50 mm.
Just started a job at NASA! As you do!
You can be excused for not making as many videos as you'd hoped.
Quality over quantity every day! Your videos are super slick and verry clean.
Keep up the good work!
Wow!! That´s probably the best video on YT for astro lenses. Thanks so much! GREAT content.
Wow, thanks! That means a lot! I plan on making another one soon!
I've just stumbled across this channel whilst looking for content for new Photographers. It's mustard, really useful information, pitched in a very easy to understand way, many thanks, good luck in the new job! I'm subscribed and working my way through the videos.
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoy the content, more coming soon!
so much work and information in it, incredible!
Thanks!
Hey, what's your opinion on tamron 17-28mm f/2.8?
A brief overview of this particular lens would be of much help!
The Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 looks good for astro, I'm surprised I didn't notice it when I put together this article. Here is a pretty good review of the lens I found: phillipreeve.net/blog/review-tamron-17-28mm-f-2-8-di-iii-rxd/#Coma_correction. Compared to the Laowa 15mm f2 the coma is noticeably better and at all focal lengths at f2.8 the coma never reaches any serious levels. The correction is not perfect but it should be acceptable for most people. Sharpness is very good wide open at 17mm through the whole frame, but corner sharpness falls off a bit as focal length increases, but never to alarming levels - again the performance is acceptable. Chromatic aberrations are also visible but again nothing to worry about.
Thank you for your response! This is just great quality content! Hoping to see more such videos!
The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 fits really well for me to shoot other genre of photography, but I am really keen on understanding and capturing the sky/stars! After this review, it's much more easier for me to make the purchase decision!
Thanks again!😊
This video was really well produced! As a beginner for astro, the graphics and concise points really helped narrow down buying options. Thank you. Definitely hit the subscribe button.
Glad it was helpful, and thanks for subscribing, I appreciate it!
i've watched this video a bunch of times for the great content, but just noticing how helpful the dots are this time around to be able to just glance over for my color and you not to have to go into it for each lens. great idea:)
Thanks!!! I'm glad the dots are helpful, they were a lot of work to edit in but I figured they would save some time for viewers. Take care!
Any update with sigma 16mm 1.4 for mirrorless aps-c? or laowa 9mm 2.8? any good?. Thks for this incredible review!
How about the Nikon Z lenses? 14-24 F2.8/14-30 F4S/20mm f1.8S/24mm f1.8s/35mm f1.8s/50mm f1.8s/24-70 F2.8S
The Nikon Z 20mm f1.8s has horrible coma wide open. The Nikon Z 24mm f1.8s shows a better performance but the coma is still noticeable even after stopping down 1 EV. The same can be said for the Nikon Z 35mm f1.8s and the Nikon Z 50mm f1.8s. The Nikon Z 14-24mm f2.8 seems like it might be a good option, unfortunately I didn't see this lens when I was doing research for the guide. The Nikon Z 24-70mm f2.8s seems good for astro especially at the longer focal lengths, however, aberrations are still present wide open (3/5).
@@Apalapse The coma on teh Z 20mm is dramatically reduced at F2.4
@@Apalapse I have a Nikon Z 24-70 f2.8s, when you say it is especially good at longer focal lengths, are you referring to 50mm+ ? And when you say aberrations are present wide open, are you suggesting to use f5.6 and higher, or do you just mean that there will always be aberrations present?
Thank you for your help
Great guide. I currently use the Laowa 15mm f2 and Sony 20mm f1.8 on my A7RIII. Fingers crossed for the 16mm f1.8 GM prime to be released in 2021.
Awesome! I am looking forward to the 16mm f1.8 GM as well - I'm guessing it will be a beast!
This is helpful and excellent video for astrophotography, THANKS. But I still want to know how about sigma 14-24 dg dn art for sony E-mount.
Im looking into buying this lens, and I heard its pretty good for astro aswell
The sigma 14-24 is a BEAST for astro - highly recommended!
Thank you for saving us a lot of time 🙌🏻
Happy I could help!
Hi Thanks a lot for the complete review. at 7:52 you say Sigma 24mm f1.4 that you mentioned earlier, however you mentioned the 20mm not the 24. Do you have the same conclusion on both regarding coma? Thanks again
First, here is a good review of the 24mm: www.lenstip.com/430.1-Lens_review-Sigma_A_24_mm_f_1.4_DG_HSM.html and here is a good review of the 20mm: www.lenstip.com/457.1-Lens_review-Sigma_A_20_mm_f_1.4_DG_HSM_Introduction.html. Coma is huge on both lenses and I do not recommend them for astro, but the 24mm is worse overall.
Thank you so much for this series of vids, very helpful/informative.
Have you ever tested or heard of the lenses below?
1. Sony 35mm f1.4 GM
2. Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG DN (latest version) (I guess it's 'DG HSM' you introduced in the video)
3. Sony ZEISS Sonnar T* 55mm F1.8 ZA
4. Tamron SP 24-70mm F2.8 Di VC USD G2
This (and your previous review of astrophotography lenses) was incredibly comprehensive and useful! Thank you for what must have been and enormous amount of work to produce these. I'm not sure if this is your 'thing', but do you plan to do a review of telephoto lenses for deep sky astrophotography? I'd really love to see a review like that on your great channel. Thanks so much again for all the work you put into your content here and on your Web site! Keep up the amazing work.
Which one is better for Sony a6500(APS-C): Samyang 14mm 2.8 Full frame vs Samyang 21mm 1.4 APS-C????? HELP!!!!
great video, thank you. Maybe someone else has already posted this question: why not including the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye Pro that I own and use for milky way photography?
Thanks for the most helpful video about this topic! I was wondering how good the Canon RF 15-35mm f2.8 and RF 24-70mm F2.8 are for astro?
I have heard the RF 15-35mm f2.8 is great for astro, with virtually no coma/astigmatism wide open. See this review: www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-15-35mm-F2.8-L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx.
The RF 24-70mm seems to have good performance. See this review: www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-24-70mm-F2.8-L-IS-USM-Lens.aspx
Great video! Really curious why you left the Sigma 16mm f1.4 off the apsc list. It's quite a terrific lens for astro, albeit not the widest focal length.
Good point! I honestly didn't even see that one so if I make a 2021 roundup that lens will for sure be included!
For Sony, now you have 50F1.2GM and 14F1.8GM. You can try them and maybe you can forget about the RF50F1.2 since you are a Sony user. Thanks for the comprehensive comparison and comments! Appreciate the effort.
hi! Do you have any plans to make an updated version of this video? I am looking to buy a 35mm for astro (Nikon Z8 camera) and am trying to decide between the Nikon 35mm f1.8 S (mirrorless) lens and the Tamron 35mm f1.4 on the FTZ adapter. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
Your vids are really awesome, but you should title this more appropriately for Sony. Nikons z lenses are outstanding for Astro. Fuji’s 8-16 is incredible and Fuji’s 16 f1.4 is awesome when stopped down to 2.2 and higher.
I do admit I was a little more biased towards Sony lenses in this guide, so I'm making an effort to include more Nikon Z and Fujifilm X lenses on my website article.
11:40 Ooph! Bit of an error there? Talking about the Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L, shows the Sigma 50mm 1.4 ART and uses the same 'other thoughts'. Performance is 5/5 for all categories? But this is that expensive portrait lens?
What about the new Sigma 14-24 2.8 DG DN? Curious if you have had a chance to test that yet. Deciding between that and Sony 15-35 2.8 to bring with me on my next astro trip.
Hey mate, you webpage is not working - is everything alright? your page was an amazing source of information! I hope it comes back one day!
I haven't seen anything from his social media since a year ago and from what I've seen no archives of the site exists. I wish I could find more info but unfortunately it's looking grim
@@maverick9708 I just hope the guy is doing fine... a pity his knowledge is lost for now :-/ he did amazing job!
Even for me that I don't speak English, this video is clear and all your description are understandable for everyone, good video thx mate
Great to hear! That means a lot since I try to communicate everything with simple illustrations that transcend any single language. Thanks for watching!
Great video! I would love to see the Viltrox 20mm 1.8 manual focus opinions in this list.
I feel so much thankful for this video. I'm using this video for choosing which lens to buy for my first purchasing for both astro & daily lens and I really x 999 want to say thank you for all those info you're sharing with people around the world. Thanks again and I truly wish the best for your health in this horrible chaos _ from a happy South Korean 😄
Thank you for watching, I'm glad it was helpful!
Many thanks for an excellent review of astro lenses. What is your thoughts about the Leica DG Vario-Summilux 10-25mm f/1.7 ASPH lens?
Wow very informative! Awesome video, I’m looking into the tamron zoom 15-30 2.8f for real estate and also Astro. How does it do at 20-24mm?
Great video..! Is a 2022 update in the works? Have you any "vintage" lens recommendations?
thanks for sharing your experience and opinion, I would like you to help me, I currently own a sigma 16mm 1.4 and I have the possibility to buy used a sony FE12-24 mm F4g, is it recommendable for astrophotography or better the rokinon 24mm F1.8, Thanks for the help, greetings.🤝🙂
Thanks for the survey. Just a suggestion - Some of the photos of lenses in the video don’t match the text so it’s sometimes not clear what lens you are actually talking about. Also, I suspect most nightscapers would take exception to you disparaging their favourite Nikon 14-24mm zoom for DSLRs 😉. It’s been used to take more classic nightscape images than most of the lenses on your recommended list. The new Z mount version is better but that’s true of most of the new mirrorless lenses outperforming the older DSLR versions of the lenses.
Basically no Nikkor primes -- please explain why (surprised not seeing your ratings for those lenses that you say "don't buy"). The lenses reviewed also exclude older, manual focus lenses. There are some f/0.95-1.2 MF lenses that might be worth mentioning.
This voice is so sastified...
Also which lens should I buy over the other: Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 Macro ‘Contemporary’ or Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8? I have a Canon M6 Mark II w/15-45 Canon EOS-M kit lens. My usage are for amateur filming, travelling many times in a year ( usually long trip ) and landscape (portrait) photography w/ basic family shooting. In my opinion, I feel the extra reach and the ‘macro’ focusing of the Sigma 17-70mm are better for me. I’m planning to shoot some Aurora Borealis and for all-time using. I’m just learning videography and photography. Please help ASAP. Wish you the best.
:)
I think you hit the nail on the head. The reach from the 17-70mm will give you a better focal length for portraits and other travel settings. I have been traveling quite a bit this year and I am using a 20mm and 85mm and I always wish I had something LONGER than an 85! 70mm will give you ~150mm equivalent field of view on the M6 which is a great documentary/journalism/portrait focal length. At 17mm and f2.8 you will be in a good spot for aurora photography or any type of astro. Plus, the macro abilities of the 17-70mm will be great for close-up portraits or macro photography in general.
@@Apalapse This is so helpful! Thank you for your valuable recommendation :)
@@huunamnguyen4397 Of course!
@@Apalapse But does it affects anything when using an adapter while shooting? And can you recommend any adapter for me?
@@huunamnguyen4397 I don't think an adapter should affect optical performance, although for autofocus, the cheaper adapters won't perform as well. I would watch RUclips reviews comparing a bunch of options since I can't recommend one personally; I'm only familiar with Sony E-mount adapters since that's the camera system I use.
I think it is time for another update to this video. I need a new lens, possibly two after watching this. I'm shooting A7Rii with Sigma 24/1.4 HSM Art, A6500 with Rokinon 12/2. I recently added an A9ii to the family so I'd like to add another FF astro lens to the family as well. Since this video came out ........Sigma 14-24/2,8 DG DN Art (DN signifies mirrorless), Sigma 20/1.4 DG DN Art, Sigma 24/1.4 DG DN Art, Sony 12-24/2.8 and the one I'm leaning hardest toward the Sony 14/1.8. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
really like that last timelapse with the traffic lights underneath the valley clouds very nice work I concur on the sony 20mm got this one awhile back and absolutely love it for astro work. really looking forward to the just released sony 14mm1.8 I hope its as nice for astro as the 20 and 24
Thanks! I've read the 14mm f1.8 is a beast for astro so far. Can't wait to get my hands on it and try it out for myself!
Great video. So the Sony 16-35 2.8 is good enough? I will buy that lens as I need it for landscape and I’d rather not buy a super specialised lens
I’ve noticed you didn’t include the Sony 12-24?
Any feedback on Nikon Z lenses such as the new 20mm 1.8, the 14-24mm 2.8 and 35mm 1.8 ? Cheers
Yes! The 20mm 1.8 is not great, the 35mm 1.8 is pretty good, and the 14-24 2.8 is awesome!
I’m so curious what would you say about the new Sigma 35mm DG DN lens on a Sony camera. Great video, I think it helps many people to choose wisely. Thanks!
I've got the Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, it's great for the crop cameras.
It also can be used on a fullframe at 16 mm, but the corners become VERY blurry... though not so bad for reports, weddings, etc.
Glad it's a good option! It's mostly designed for APS-C cameras and has good performance on crop sensors.
The Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM is one i would avoid. Coma and Astigmatism even in the center make bright stars look like artificial galaxies. However i own it and since its my widest lens below f/4 i occasionally use it because the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG is just very tight for astro (but then again really nice performing like Apalapse said @11:31)
Not one lens from Fuji?
Thanks for the comment. One thing that I missed in the video was to add the dots for the fuji mounts in the APS-C lens category, and I did, admittely forget to provide any native Fuji lenses. I'm going to make a pinned comment to address this.
@@Apalapse that would be appreciated. A great video by the way, it's very helpful. I used to shoot with Sony but thought I'd give Fuji a try and really enjoying the 16-55 red badge lens.
What about the 24-70 Nikkor 2.8? Trying to decide between that or tamron 24-70mm 2.8. Wanted a mid range zoom for my Nikon d750. Thanks
Thank you for the very informative and helpful video. I own a Tamron 17-35mm F/2.8-4 (A037) and use it on a Canon R6. It is great for landscape photography and I would like to know if it is also suitable for astrophotography or if I should buy a fixed focal length. Thanks in advance for your opinion.
What is your honest opinion on the canon 16-35 L f2.8 for astrophotography? Does it perform well or does it fall into the not reccomended category like the other l series lenses in the video?
www.astropix.com/html/i_astrop/eq_tests/16-35.html this review has some pretty good samples of coma and asigmatism wide open at f/2.8. As you can see the performance is just okay - I think you can find better at the same price.
Hello, I'm sorry for my English, I'm looking to see if I bought the "Sigma 20mm 1.4 ART" I have a "canon 6d mark ii", and I didn't understand exactly when you indicated that it is not recommended to buy it, if we don't have any accessories?
thanks for the great video! in your opinion, how does the Sony 35mm FE F1.8 lens fair in this comparison for astro?
I had to hit that subscribe button - beautifully produced video 👌
Thank you for watching and for the sub!
Think another update is in order; curious how the Viltrox 16mm f/1.8 would stack up.
Hi Vincent,
I was wondering if you could give me your thoughts on Soviet MTO mirror lenses for Astrophotography. I can buy a 500mm f/8 mirror by MTO for $200 or so, and I'm tempted because they basically look like mini-Maksutovs, which I know make sharp images when used as telescopes
I have a Samyang (Rokinon) 24mm T1.5. I tried using it for astrophotography earlier, and at the widest aperture I would give that a 3/5 overall as well.
have you tried the Samyang/Rokinon 20mm f/1.8 ED AS UMC?
Thank you very much for the information on this video.
Thanks for the comment! I have not personally tried the Samyang 20 mm f1.8. I googled the lens and found some reviews, though, and here's what I can say:
The lens has exceptional center sharpness and good corner sharpness all the way from f1.8. Its performance is among the best lenses. Chromatic aberration is very low in the frame center but fringing is seen in the edges. This can be corrected with software. I give sharpness a 4/5 and chromatic aberration a 4/5. Coma is seen in the extreme edges but it's not pronounced. I give this a 3/5.
Ovearll I think the lens would be a good option for astro!
Here are some of the reviews I found:
ePhotozine: www.ephotozine.com/article/samyang-20mm-f-1-8-ed-as-umc-review-30094#:~:text=The%20central%20performance%20of%20the,result%20is%20still%20very%20good.
gippslandimages: www.gippslandimages.com.au/samyang-20mm-f1-8-ed-umc-wide-angle-lens-2/#:~:text=Conclusion.-,The%20Samyang%2020mm%20f1.,subjects%20and%20blur%20away%20backgrounds.
What about lenses like the Rokinon 135mm or the Samyan 135mm. It seems that you didn't include medium telephotos in your list.
Have you ever tested the Laowa 100mm 2.8 lens for astrophotography? It is a manual focus 2x magnification macro lens that also focuses to infinity. I am considering purchasing the lens for macro images, but if it also produces terrific astro images... well then it is a no brainer for me since I have a wide range of photography interests.
I am a beginner I did Milky Way for a handful of nights on 2020. My setup is not the ideal for this: My video cam Panasonic GH5. 1st I started with the Lumix 12-35mm F2.8. decent for what it is. But then I wanted a Wide Angle lens and bought the Tokina 11-20mm F2.8 with the Speed Booster Viltrox EF-M2 (Which allow aperture down to F2.0 ). I like how much of the Milky Way I am capturing but it came out with a lot of coma. 1st time I used at ISO 2000 / F2.0 / SS 30" and it was a disaster.... 2nd time I used at ISO 2000 / F2.8 / SS 20" and it was better... and 3rd time I used at ISO 2000 / F2.8 / SS 30" and it was not good again.... I was thinking on buying the Rokinon 10mm F2.8 or the Rokinon 12mm F2.0 but now I see your review and I might be the one doing something wrong. Not the Tokina. Do you have any thoughts? Thanks in advance. And thanks for this detailed review, the best I have seen so far.
about to snipe a 40mm f/1.4 art on eBay since I saw great reviews and apparently it can just be used wide open lol. the 24mm rokinon 1.4 I got off amazon was a gem. I must've gotten lucky because it's SO sharp with ZERO CA, coma, astigmatism at f/2.8 on a tracker. really good value
For m43 olympus 8mm 1.8 fisheye probably one of the best ultra wide. What do you think about it?
I checked some reviews of the lens and it looks great for astro save for medium levels of chromatic aberration.
What about tamron 24mm f2.8?
@Apalapse Thanks a lot for the detailed review. Really helpful. I am confused between 11-16, 11-20, 14-20 tokina lens on which one to buy? Appreciate if you can help me here.
Thank you. I'll provide some reviews of those Tokina lenses here:
11-16: www.lenstip.com/379.1-Lens_review-Tokina_AT-X_116_PRO_DX_II_AF_11-16_mm_f_2.8_Introduction.html
11-20: www.lenstip.com/451.4-Lens_review-Tokina_AT-X_PRO_DX_11-20_mm_f_2.8_Image_resolution.html
14-20: www.lenstip.com/470.1-Lens_review-Tokina_AT-X_PRO_SD_14-20_mm_f_2_(IF)_DX-Introduction.html
The 11-16 and 11-20 control coma well, the 14-20 controls coma excellently. All are good buys to be honest.
Great review thank you! What about Canon EF 35mm 2.0 IS and RF 35mm 1.8 ? Another video for deep sky would be interesting with 85 100 135 lenses ... if you can obviously ^^
Checking the Canon EF 35mm f2, while it is sharp wide open in the center at the full frame edge at f2 the image quality is weak, which is also evident by high levels of coma (www.lenstip.com/365.7-Lens_review-Canon_EF_35_mm_f_2_IS_USM_Coma__astigmatism_and_bokeh.html). The RF 35mm f1.8 looks to be a bit better but there is still coma present wide open in the corners. In this review, www.kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/lenses/35mm-f18.htm#coma, I see that on stars the coma isn't too problematic but you can clearly see it on the streetlights. From other tests, the resolution seems pretty good wide open at f1.8 although some reviews mention a "haze" across the entire image frame (not sure what that means). I think this lens would be "okay" for astro, and at $499 it seems like a good deal.
i use a sony 16mm f1.4 apsc lens and i love it.i have to stop down to f 2 for very good sharpness. and chromatic aberration and coma is quite little.
The Sigma 16mm f1.4 is a very good lens, and by f2 you should be seeing good results.
I really neede this. Thank you so much for taking the time, and effort to help all of us,cheers.
What??? Are you sure Sigma 24-70 DG DN is regular in aberration and sharpness??? Is one of the best optics in that couple of features...
I based that remark on this review I found: www.lenstip.com/574.7-Lens_review-Sigma_A_24-70_mm_f_2.8_DG_DN_Coma__astigmatism_and_bokeh.html which describes the coma as visible, but compared to other lenses this isn't a bad performance. The sharpness at the full-frame edge is just decent (www.lenstip.com/574.4-Lens_review-Sigma_A_24-70_mm_f_2.8_DG_DN_Image_resolution.html).
Hi I was writing to ask for advice on the 15mm f2 laowa,I have been tempted to buy it to get a better width in captures,I do own the tokina firin 20mm f2,would the laowa be any better for captures or would it be better just to stick with the tokina thanks
I was wondering if you've ever tried a catadioptric lens with your camera for astrophotography. On paper, anyway, they seem like an ideal solution for those of use using star trackers with limited payload capacity: smaller and lighter than higher focal length prime telephoto lenses, and able to get to very high focal lengths. Don't see any reviews of them with cameras, though, so I'm a bit skeptical. Just wondering if you've had any experience with them. Thanks!
Currently Canon RF lenses ? Do you have any recommendations, getting into the RF market and looking to give astro a try :). Thanks
14-35 F4 and 24-70 2.8 current lenses but looking at a prime.
I know you made this video a long rime ago but I have a question. What are your thoughts on Sigma 20mm art ? It's more affordable than 14mm and doesn't sound as wide as 28mm. Does it behave well under the night sky?
I'd love to see a video talking about the differences between the different focal lengths for astrophotography!
This has become my go-to guide for astro lens as I'm looking ahead to investing in one. As a Nikon shooter, it does put a little bit of sour taste in my mouth. Can you elaborate on how their prime lens are bad for astro in general? And what would be the very best lens with a native mount for Nikon shooter in your opinion, or do folks like me should just adapt something from Canon/Sony?
Such a good job researching and making this whole video easy to watch and understand. Amazing job!
Thanks!
Hi, you mentioned the canon 24mm 1.4L. How about the canon 24mm 1.4L mkii?
I only own the 24mmm 1.4 canon and it's what I have and what i'll use. Sure there are verter ones but if you already hace It you can do much verter t'han without any lens :)
The mk II version still has massive amounts of star-deforming aberrations. See this review: www.lenstip.com/245.7-Lens_review-Canon_EF_24_mm_f_1.4L_II_USM_Coma_and_astigmatism.html
@@Apalapse Thank you for your reply; good information and also good to know - I actually own the MkII but i have not used it for astro yet
@@__jairomartinez__ Let me know how it works for you!
@@Apalapse the plan is to travel to the black Forest in February 2021 - the plan is to shoot the milky way there. A shot that I have in my head for years. Will use the 24mm on the EOS R.will let you know
7artisans 28mm f1.4 doesn't have a sony e mount option as far as I can see (there is a Leica m mount option)
Awesome video. Very useful. Do you have any idea on the Canon RF 85mm F1.2? Does it perform similarly to the Canon RF 50mm F1.2 for astrophotography? Thanks in advance.
Looks like the edge of the frame is almost absent of coma: www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-85mm-F1.2-L-USM-DS-Lens.aspx
@@Apalapse Thanks!
Thanks for an awesome video, it is very informative. I have a Canon EF 16-35 f/4 and the RF 24-70 f/2.8. I'm looking for a UWA for astrophotography. I'm tossing between the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4, Irix 15mm f/2.4 (either Blackstone or Firefly version) and the Rokinon AF 14mm f/2.8 RF mount. Which lens would you recommend? Thanks.
Last summer I used the canon 1.8 for a bit of dabbling in astro, and then I broke it (dropped doh) and been looking at getting a new 50mm to have in general, with eye on the sigma 50 1.4 art and was just thinking to myself, I wonder how good it'd be for Astro as well, sounds like it'd do fantastic. Really wanna step up my Astro game this summer
And what about the SIGMA 14-24/2.8 DG DN (for SONY E)?
I have heard REALLY good things about this lens.
Would you recommend 14-24mm f 2.8 DG DN Art Lens for Sony full frame cameras for astrophotography/time-lapse? Also could you show a comparison between the differences of shooting with lens with aperture opening of f1.8 vs f2.8. Eagerly waiting for a reply. Thank you!
The 14-24 mm f2.8 Sigma is one of the best full frame lenses ever produced. I'm sad I didn't include it in my review because it is a 5/5 in all categories.
sorry, i felt Tamron 17-28 2.8 is a pretty good sharp wide lens, do you have any rating for its chromatic aberrations, stars and sharpness rating ?
Any advice for someone new using a Nikon D3400? As far as good lenses? I also have the Canon EOS T6. Thank you in advance.
Hi.. For APS-C you mention Sigma 16-35 f1.8 Art.... But there is no 16-35 f1.8 lense found in Canon ..Is is 18-35 f1.8 ?
It would be great if you could review the Sony 14mm GM lens. Thank you and subscribed.
Is it ok to use Sony20mm / 1.8 G on Sony APS-C for astro? Or would you suggest to stick to Rokinon/Samyang options?
Great video, I was wondering about the Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 and the somewhat new for APS-C, Tamron 11-20mm f2.8.. Any thoughts on those two?
They're really good for the value and should work well. They have some aberrations wide open but nothing serious!
right now I'm looking forward to hour opinion about new Samyang/Rokinon 24mm f1.8 for astrophotography
f/1.8 or f/1.4? There is no 24mm f/1.8 I could find on the market.
Great video! What about the 7Artisans 25mm f1.8? Have you tried it?
I have not tried that one personally. Is it known for good astro performance?
@@Apalapse I'd like to buy it but couldn't find any reviews about its performance in astrophotography
What's your opinion on the Sigma 14-24 2.8 DN? I didn't see it here so wasn't sure if it's good enough for astro.
Looking at the chart I can see only one option for Nikon Z mirrorless cameras, is that right? I'm looking for buying a Nikon Z6, any recommendation for this camera?
Congrats on the new job! sticking with you! appreciate the great content! LINK YOUR WEBSITE IN THE DESCRIPTION!
Willd do, just finished the article today!
for me, this tamron 35 f1.4 is a masterpiece, one of the best lenses I've ever had. has TOP characteristics. I've tried a lot of lenses, but I know one thing, I'll never sell this one.
Great comparison! I currently have the option of a second hand 24mm GM (priced around a new 20mm 1.8). It should be my lightweight hiking and astro lens - given your experience, should I go for it or rather take a 20mm 1.8?
I think both of them are pretty much the same in terms of quality. I would go with whatever is the cheaper option. Personally, I enjoy the 20 mm f1.8g since I actually own it, but I used the 24 mm 1.4GM when it was on loan and I loved it!
Hey 👋🏻 loved your video. I have a question. There are two new lenses I saw on the market and I would like to know what do you think about them. The Sony 24mm 2.8 and the samyang 24 mm 1.8(they advertise as a good astro lens) did you hear about them? Or did you test any of them?
Thank you
Yes I have heard about these lenses. Here's some info on them. A good technical review of the Sony can be found here: www.lenstip.com/603.1-Lens_review-Sony_FE_24_mm_f_2.8_G_review.html. Aberrations are controlled pretty well in this lens, although it's not entirely perfect. I would give it a 4/5. The samyang performs about the same, maybe a 4.2-4.5/5. Here's a review on that optic: dustinabbott.net/2021/05/samyang-af-24mm-f1-8-review/. I like how they advertise it for astrophotography - very interesting when manufacturers do that.
@@Apalapse Thank you. I appreciate it your answer.
How about a similar list for telephoto, though not for the same type of shot as these? Thanks.
Watched this video thrice already. I am new to photography, ok with landscape but want to get into Astro. Can you recommend me 1 lens which you will pick any day but is economical. I already have 18-50 f2.8 Sigma. Thanks a lot for this video and have subscribed so that I don't miss out any in the future 🙏