Exactly what I am talking about, number people are cool! But my wife says it's horrible when I start counting cards, that it's too competitive, it should be a fun family time, and I am ruining my six year olds birthday party...
@@superluigidummyno he didn't If he just shot the dealer, he would've won if the live is on 1 or 3, giving him 2/3rd chances of winning By shooting himself, he guaranteed that he would only win if the live was on 2, which is only a 33% chance
@@Void-rj3sq I've never thought about it that way, and to some degree you're right. However, there are problems with what you just said. 1. After shooting himself, he technically could've shot himself again and won if the live was on 3. This is obviously not a good strategy, but he still can win if the live is not on 2. 2. Had he shot at the dealer and it been a blank, the dealer could have easily shot at himself during his turn (again, not a good strategy, but the dealer is a little silly sometimes) and killed him if the live was on 3.
While it important to think of the numbers it's not the only thing at play here If he shot himself with a black it would be a 50/50 chance and if the second round was also a blank the dealer is left with the only live and you lose
Doctor : Welp 33% was enough for you to almost fucking die, so i hope your big ass brain learnt something becase if that happens again, you'll not get saved by me again
Technically, with low enough odds it becomes not just statistically improbable, but statistically impossible, so at a certain point if that chance happens, you’d have done something less likely than all the air rushing to one corner of the room all at once
Important lesson to everyone sometimes roulette isn't really about numbers, it's about luck. But most importantly its about making sure your next opponent doesn't have any luck
So, You have three rounds, one of which is live. If you shoot yourself, you have a 33% chance of dying. From there, if you either shoot yourself or the monster, it is a 50% chance to kill the monster. That means, you need to first risk a 33% chance, and then a 50% chance. However, if you shoot the monster, you have a 33% chance of winning. From there, the monster either shoots you or itself, both of which is a 50% chance of losing the game. So if you shot first, you have a 33% chance of winning immediately. If you lose that, you still have a 50% chance of winning. So, both paths side by side are; 33% chance of losing, 50% chance of winning. 33% chance of winning, 50% chance of winning.
Aiming at yourself: 33% cance to lose outright and *then* a 50% chance aiming at the dealer Vs. Aiming at the dealer: 33% to *win* outright and then a 50% chance for the dealer to get you. The numbers may or may not lie, it's just that you didn't speak their language.
@@dont-worry-about-it- I am not very good with statistics myself. The way I rationalized it: Aiming at yourself increases your *AND* the dealers chances to deal damage in the following turns plus has a chance to hit yourself. I watched a video on the topic a while ago, and unless items are involved, it is pretty much always in your favor to aim at the dealer.
The first scenario has a guaranteed 2/3 chance of success. The odds of the second round doesn't matter, because you're aiming at yourself. The second scenario, however, is a bit trickier. With a 66% chance of missing the first time, and the second shot being a blank 50% of the time, that makes your odds a COLLECTIVE 33% for missing both shots, or a 1/3 chance. Ironically enough, that means both aiming at your opponent and aiming at yourself have the exact same odds.
@@hadesciphernius5244 isn't the first scenario a 1/3 chance to win though? You only win if the life round is in position 2, and lose if it is in positions 1 or 3.
@@hadesciphernius5244 aiming at yourself has a ⅔ chance of you losing (⅓ + (⅔ * ½) = ⅔). aiming at dealer has a ⅔ chance of you winning (⅓ + (⅔ * ½) = ⅔). so no it's just better to aim at the dealer.
@Kailioli I was referencing Joe Bidens "if you put a brace on a pistol it turns it into a gun, you can shoot a larger caliber out of it," which all of that is completely false
You merely adopted the logic. Me? I was born in it, molded by it, adapting my teachings with chance to become predictable and unpredictable all at once.
@@rory8182 There are... actually two obvious answers. And it depends on how one answers this question "What is the goal of the game?" (The correct answer... is killing the dealer, so kill the dealer. "Guessing the round" is a nice bonus, but I wouldn't bet my HP on attacking myself more often.)
@@rory8182 IF HE SHOOTS THE DEALER TWICE: IN 1/3rd of circumstances, the dealer dies. The dealer is random (although technically it doesn't matter, because a person can't see through solid metal, therefore they are shooting at random). In 1/2 of circumstances now, the numbers man dies. in 1/2, the dealer dies. therefore, 1/3+(1/2 of 2/3), or 2/3 chance he wins. IF HE SHOOTS HIMSELF AND THEN THE DEALER: There is a 1/3 chance he dies. There is then a 1/2 chance he wins. 1/2 of 2/3 is 1/3, as said, therefore, a 1/3 chance he wins. It's just the monty hall problem.
btw fun fact if you do the calculation: shooting yourself has a 1/3 chance of immediately killing you, and even if you survive, it's 50/50 from there no matter what you do. so it's a 1/3 chance of winning shooting the dealer immediately grants you the win in 1/3 of the cases, and if you don't win immediately, it's 50/50 again. so you win in 2/3 of the cases meaning a real numbers man is shooting the dealer
Technically, if you'd shoot the dealer for 33% chance of a blank, EVEN if you hit blank, the dealer would have only 50% of shooting you. So you have one in three chance of killing him, and even if you don't, you still have almost the same chance of survival as before.
2 blanks 1 live If you fire at yourself 1/3 you lose 2/3 you live to fire again Fire again 1/2 you win 1/2 you lose Total chance of winning 2/3 x 1/2 = 1/3 If you fire at the other guy 1/3 you win 2/3 he gets to shoot If he gets to shoot 1/2 you win 1/2 you lose Total 1/3 + 2/3 x 1/2 = 2/3 You should aim at the other guy Edit: this isn’t criticism I just wanted to do the math in my head
I don't actually know the rules to this game, so I'm going to take a wild guess and assume that aiming at yourself lets you keep control of the target next round, while aiming at the dealer transfers target contr to them next round. If so, your math is on point.
I'm not sure if you're being serious or not but I'm gonna explain it either way because I have nothing better to do right now. Technically it's not 33% and 66% it's actually 33.33333333% repeating infinitely same for 66.6666666% this is just because it's impossible to get a whole number when dividing 100 by 3 so instead you get this infinitely repeating number. Honestly you probably already knew all that but I just like ranting about math.
He did the math poorly. If the next round is 50/50 it doesn't matter who is holding the gun. The only benefit you get from shooting yourself is you get to hold onto the gun. Thus you should shoot the dealer. You get a 1 in 3 chance of winning the game, and the next round is 50/50 if you don't win on the spot. If you shoot yourself, you have a 1 in 3 chance of losing the game, and still are on that same 50/50 if you guessed correctly.
I've seen Jackson's live streams. Can confirm this is exactly how Buckshot Roulette always goes.
Can confirm that Whistler and Fudgee is telling the truth 👆👆
Apparently shooting self in that game is kinda pointless, there's a whole video on it, check it out y'all
Agreed. I think those were his exact words on stream
Can confirm
He is indeed a numbers man of all time
Exactly what I am talking about, number people are cool! But my wife says it's horrible when I start counting cards, that it's too competitive, it should be a fun family time, and I am ruining my six year olds birthday party...
Fr Fr
I mean, who doesn’t count cards at Uno
If that 6 year old doesn't want their birthday ruined, they should learn how to count cards.
sounds like you're teaching your kid a valuable life lesson, house always wins.
"Honey please stop doing that , you're ruining your six year old child first game of russian roulette..."
“I put my two bollocks on the line and left with three.” Why is that line so powerful
Yeah why is no one talking about that it's the best line I've heard in all of fiction all year
Yeap
Yep, I liked the video right after hearing that line lol
@@Elessar00I liked the video when I saw it was Jackson
Establishes dominance 😂
The definition of "the risk I took was calculated. But man, I am bad at math"
that's hilarious dude 😂😂
Not really, he did the math right.
@@superluigidummyno he didn't
If he just shot the dealer, he would've won if the live is on 1 or 3, giving him 2/3rd chances of winning
By shooting himself, he guaranteed that he would only win if the live was on 2, which is only a 33% chance
@@Void-rj3sq I've never thought about it that way, and to some degree you're right.
However, there are problems with what you just said.
1. After shooting himself, he technically could've shot himself again and won if the live was on 3. This is obviously not a good strategy, but he still can win if the live is not on 2.
2. Had he shot at the dealer and it been a blank, the dealer could have easily shot at himself during his turn (again, not a good strategy, but the dealer is a little silly sometimes) and killed him if the live was on 3.
While it important to think of the numbers it's not the only thing at play here
If he shot himself with a black it would be a 50/50 chance and if the second round was also a blank the dealer is left with the only live and you lose
"I'm numbers man
AND THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE!"
Famous last words
Yup that's the joke good job!!!
@@smoke7877 Thanks
Doctor : Welp 33% was enough for you to almost fucking die, so i hope your big ass brain learnt something becase if that happens again, you'll not get saved by me again
As a fellow numbers man i can confirm
Well, the best odds of winning was to fire the demon instead of himself 😂
Reminder that blanks are still deadly at that range. DO NOT try this at home, a lawyer accidentally offed himself doing this.
I was just thinking about that
It seems like blanks in this game stop the bullet from firing at all, unlike real blanks
It’s not a real blank, it’s just an empty shell
Damn, there goes my plan for the weekend
Yep, just the pressure can kill you even without an actual bullet
Buckshot roulette skit is crazy💀
And it works so well
Wait till it gets to backshot roulette skits
Funny thing is it's accurate to his actual lore of his chances in the game
It’s not crazy
@@julio4972 crazy? I was crazy once
A chance is still a chance, regardless of how small.
Which is a great slogan to remember when finding or avoiding trouble.
Technically, with low enough odds it becomes not just statistically improbable, but statistically impossible, so at a certain point if that chance happens, you’d have done something less likely than all the air rushing to one corner of the room all at once
It’s like what I always say: if the probability is not equal to 0, there’s still a chance
@@BisexualPlagueDoctor
Loving the pedantry, and yes you're correct.
Hence the phrase "Nothing is impossible".
xcom. end of sentence.
The numbers do not lie, it is now certain that the next two shots are indeed blanks. #JacksonStatham
Best hashtag ever
Important lesson to everyone sometimes roulette isn't really about numbers, it's about luck. But most importantly its about making sure your next opponent doesn't have any luck
It is about numbers. This guy just got the numbers wrong. He had a higher probability of winning if he shot the other guy instead of himself.
"AND THE NUMBERS DONT LIE": immediately dies 😂😂
The funny thing is, he didn’t even do the correct decision if you want optimal numbers
Umm... how?
So,
You have three rounds, one of which is live.
If you shoot yourself, you have a 33% chance of dying. From there, if you either shoot yourself or the monster, it is a 50% chance to kill the monster.
That means, you need to first risk a 33% chance, and then a 50% chance.
However, if you shoot the monster, you have a 33% chance of winning. From there, the monster either shoots you or itself, both of which is a 50% chance of losing the game.
So if you shot first, you have a 33% chance of winning immediately. If you lose that, you still have a 50% chance of winning.
So, both paths side by side are;
33% chance of losing, 50% chance of winning.
33% chance of winning, 50% chance of winning.
Do none of yall understand basic statistics? HAVE YOU NOT HEARD OF THE MONTY HALL PROBLEM??
@@anon.9303 the Monty hall problem has nothing to do with buckshot roulette
@@TheEmbrs Yesss, i was waiting for someone to point that out! Makes the short even funnier!
Aiming at yourself:
33% cance to lose outright and *then* a 50% chance aiming at the dealer
Vs.
Aiming at the dealer:
33% to *win* outright and then a 50% chance for the dealer to get you.
The numbers may or may not lie, it's just that you didn't speak their language.
Man, there is a reason I did poorly in statistics (twice). I have no idea how those numbers work 💀
@@dont-worry-about-it- I am not very good with statistics myself. The way I rationalized it: Aiming at yourself increases your *AND* the dealers chances to deal damage in the following turns plus has a chance to hit yourself.
I watched a video on the topic a while ago, and unless items are involved, it is pretty much always in your favor to aim at the dealer.
The first scenario has a guaranteed 2/3 chance of success. The odds of the second round doesn't matter, because you're aiming at yourself.
The second scenario, however, is a bit trickier. With a 66% chance of missing the first time, and the second shot being a blank 50% of the time, that makes your odds a COLLECTIVE 33% for missing both shots, or a 1/3 chance.
Ironically enough, that means both aiming at your opponent and aiming at yourself have the exact same odds.
@@hadesciphernius5244 isn't the first scenario a 1/3 chance to win though? You only win if the life round is in position 2, and lose if it is in positions 1 or 3.
@@hadesciphernius5244
aiming at yourself has a ⅔ chance of you losing (⅓ + (⅔ * ½) = ⅔).
aiming at dealer has a ⅔ chance of you winning (⅓ + (⅔ * ½) = ⅔).
so no it's just better to aim at the dealer.
This feels like markiplier's playthrough
markiplier didnt die tho
" THE NUMBERS MASON !!! WHAT DO THEY MEAN !!! "
ANOTHER BLACK OPS OG FAN!
The joke stopped being funny in 2021
@@anon.9303it’s still funny. People just over did it
“Two blanks in the chamber”💀
Spoken like Joe Biden himself
@@TheAspiringEngineerI dont get it.
@@Kailiolithe chamber is the thing to load a round, usually only a round, not two or more
@Kailioli I was referencing Joe Bidens "if you put a brace on a pistol it turns it into a gun, you can shoot a larger caliber out of it," which all of that is completely false
The numbers didn't lie.
He just guessed wrong.
“I don’t play games of chance”
*Continues to calculate his chances & play*
Being a "numbers man" he should know, that shooting at his opponent gives him a higher probability of winning.
A numbers man getting the numbers wrong, all cliches fulfilled, I'm satisfied
“I don’t leave things to chance!”
“There’s a 66% chance-“
You merely adopted the logic. Me? I was born in it, molded by it, adapting my teachings with chance to become predictable and unpredictable all at once.
I can’t stop laughing especially after playing the game it’s self!
🤣😂🤣
“I don’t play games, I win them”
For those who didn’t watch the stream. This actually happend
wait really? whose stream? this guy's?
Every time there’s a dramatic pause, I feel like laughing out loud for some reason. Splendid skit!
The numbers aren’t lying they just arent in your favour lol
What is that star
They were in his favour, the numbers said you should shoot the dealer, he just thought he understood them when he didn’t
@@jams_toast1 this is like that goat door thing where the obvious answer is the wrong one
@@rory8182 There are... actually two obvious answers. And it depends on how one answers this question "What is the goal of the game?" (The correct answer... is killing the dealer, so kill the dealer. "Guessing the round" is a nice bonus, but I wouldn't bet my HP on attacking myself more often.)
@@rory8182 IF HE SHOOTS THE DEALER TWICE:
IN 1/3rd of circumstances, the dealer dies.
The dealer is random (although technically it doesn't matter, because a person can't see through solid metal, therefore they are shooting at random). In 1/2 of circumstances now, the numbers man dies. in 1/2, the dealer dies.
therefore, 1/3+(1/2 of 2/3), or 2/3 chance he wins.
IF HE SHOOTS HIMSELF AND THEN THE DEALER:
There is a 1/3 chance he dies. There is then a 1/2 chance he wins. 1/2 of 2/3 is 1/3, as said, therefore, a 1/3 chance he wins.
It's just the monty hall problem.
A Wise man once said 'If it's not 100% it's 50%'😂😂😂
This man can stay in my feed for as long as he likes 🙏🙏🙏
He said he was a numbers man, not a smart man
Remember kids, if it's not 100%, it's 50%
Closed my eyes and thought I was listening to Jason Statham 😂😂
Tbh Markiplier did amazing going off the numbers
A true numbers man would shoot the opponent and force the opponent to decide whether they would win or lose the 50/50.
"THE NUMBERS MASON!"
"WHAT DO THEY MEAN"!?!?!
Reminds me of the best scene from kiss kiss bang bang.
Wait, I just realized that your "shotgun" is that D20 staff. Excellent taste sir.
There is ALWAYS a catch, always.
NOTHING CAN DESCRIBE ME IN THAT GAME MORE PERFECTLY
"put 2 on the line, left with 3" 💀💀
I like to think that this guy adopts a new personality every time he dies
He was a numbers man...
*was*
"And the numbers dont lie" goes so hard
You're an OG if you saw the inspiration for this on stream
hey, could you please tell me what stream everyone is talking about?
@@LesleyMcgonagall he streamed recently, playing Buckshot Roulette at the start. And joked about being a numbers man in that voice 😂
@@PrematureBurger oh, I see. Was the stream on RUclips? Or twitch or something? I want to watch it. Thanks!
@@LesleyMcgonagall RUclips :)
@@PrematureBurger thanks! 😘
"See Joe, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at Sacrifice."
This reminded me of Kano from mortal kombat, the first movie lol also, great clip 🫶
“I dont play games of chance” while playing Russian roulette with a shotgun is so real
Is anyone else just noticing the insane jawline on this guy?
I noticed it as you mentioned it
🤫🧏♂️
Me doing the same speech but with "I'm a lucky man" and going with my heart
The dealer, flipping a coin on if he shots you or himself: 🙂
btw fun fact if you do the calculation: shooting yourself has a 1/3 chance of immediately killing you, and even if you survive, it's 50/50 from there no matter what you do. so it's a 1/3 chance of winning
shooting the dealer immediately grants you the win in 1/3 of the cases, and if you don't win immediately, it's 50/50 again. so you win in 2/3 of the cases
meaning a real numbers man is shooting the dealer
Technically, if you'd shoot the dealer for 33% chance of a blank, EVEN if you hit blank, the dealer would have only 50% of shooting you.
So you have one in three chance of killing him, and even if you don't, you still have almost the same chance of survival as before.
The bollocks line! Killed me to death
That shit at the end 😂😂😂
Numbers can't tell you which round is not blank, but cheating can
I'm a cheating man
This is accurate cuz jackson plays like this xd
What is that star
@@Tejasextra it means ur a member to the jackson channel
“I’m a numbers man” kills him self
Got 'im with the sleepy stick
Your videos always make me laugh, thank you 😅....😂
The numbers lied
I love this more than i can express in a single coment .
2 blanks 1 live
If you fire at yourself
1/3 you lose
2/3 you live to fire again
Fire again
1/2 you win
1/2 you lose
Total chance of winning
2/3 x 1/2 = 1/3
If you fire at the other guy
1/3 you win
2/3 he gets to shoot
If he gets to shoot
1/2 you win
1/2 you lose
Total 1/3 + 2/3 x 1/2 = 2/3
You should aim at the other guy
Edit: this isn’t criticism I just wanted to do the math in my head
I don't actually know the rules to this game, so I'm going to take a wild guess and assume that aiming at yourself lets you keep control of the target next round, while aiming at the dealer transfers target contr to them next round. If so, your math is on point.
Most relatable video you’ve ever made 😂 The numbers always fail me…
Jackson Stream 2024 colorized
what happend to the comments
It’s been happening on every video of seen, idk why tho
Real bro tf i even tested on chrome didnt work 😭
Idk why
“I put my two bollocks in the line in Peru. Left there with three.” IS SO INSANELY HARD OMG
Where did all the comments go
Love to see you make a bit from a stream in to a whole separate vid!
Stop. “2 blanks left in that chamber”
Yea sounds good to me
Right after watching this I got an ad for Morgan&Morgan that said numbers don't lie
66% for blank
33% for live
What's the 1% then?
I'm not sure if you're being serious or not but I'm gonna explain it either way because I have nothing better to do right now. Technically it's not 33% and 66% it's actually 33.33333333% repeating infinitely same for 66.6666666% this is just because it's impossible to get a whole number when dividing 100 by 3 so instead you get this infinitely repeating number. Honestly you probably already knew all that but I just like ranting about math.
@@king_pig8945🤯🤯🤯😳😳😳😱😱😱
1% is that the game crashes. : P
(Also, can I ask the source of your profile pic?)
1% that it is explosive
1% chance you miss your brain
"I don't play games of chance."
Immediately plays game of chance.
The numbers don't lie, but that's just statistics
That's Steiner math right there
Turns out, blanks are still lethal
66% blank and 33% live
meanwhile the 1%:what am i?
Remember me in the Sea of comments
I will brother
I will brother
We will till the end
pls remember me too (idk how im always so early to his vids)
i will, brother
Imagine saying that then having to walk back in there with the most embarrassed face ever
I live in aus vic to
Oh okay these shorts are so much funnier after ive seen you play the game i love it
Na id win
The other characters name being “poopoo” is so on point for the people that play with game 😂😂😂🎉
First 100 who watched this like it
Numbers man once threw a boomerang and it didn't come back for its own safety
Bro didn't do math, he became math
"dang it, you got me monologueing"
Literally Jackson when streaming buckshot roulette
"I said I was a numbers man. I didn't say i was any good at them."
Señor dealer, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at sacrifice!
Meanwhile Nogla: gets it right 18 right in a row
Dealer: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH (shoots himself 50 times)
lol he did the math good he just didn't have plot armor to protect from the bad ending
He did the math poorly. If the next round is 50/50 it doesn't matter who is holding the gun. The only benefit you get from shooting yourself is you get to hold onto the gun. Thus you should shoot the dealer. You get a 1 in 3 chance of winning the game, and the next round is 50/50 if you don't win on the spot. If you shoot yourself, you have a 1 in 3 chance of losing the game, and still are on that same 50/50 if you guessed correctly.
@@jaketerpening3284 that's not bad math that's thinking you've got the plot armor to survive the play
I can respect fighting the urge to say "do you feel lucky, punk" when he said are you also a numbers man, gave off the same energy
I fell like that maths meme would be very accurate here
"so tell me dealer, are you a man of the land, or a man of the sea?"
Actually, this kinda feels like the Monty Hall problem. Bro was a numbers man, but not a paradox man.
Numbers man: And the numbers don't lie dealer: are you sure about that🤨🤨
2 shells in one chamber? Gotta be a wizard to fit that many there😂
When u ur playing buckshot roulette, don't trust your heart, trust the chances.
"Poopoo" the name got me rollin
Accurate, pointing it at yourself is almost always mathematically worse.