Does Intelligent Design Exist in Nature? - Dr. Paul Nelson

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 дек 2020
  • This video segment is from "Beyond Is Genesis History? Vol 3 : Bible & Stars," where we explore the universe, the Tower of Babel, the Hebrew text, and the history of interpretation of Genesis, and much more! Check it out on our website: bit.ly/BIGH-3.
    Philosopher of Science Paul Nelson compares the way a supercomputer works to a bacterial cell, then explores the countless things any paradigm of origins must necessarily explain.
    After Dr. Paul Nelson received his BA in philosophy with a minor in evolutionary biology from the University of Pittsburgh, he entered the University of Chicago, where he received his PhD (1998) in the philosophy of biology and evolutionary theory. He is a philosopher of biology who has been involved in the intelligent design debate internationally for over two decades.
    For more information about Dr. Nelson, please visit: bit.ly/2ClszFs.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    ✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
    🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
    🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
    🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
    🔬 Help support the advancement of creation science: bit.ly/genesis-fund

Комментарии • 148

  • @ChristysChannelYall
    @ChristysChannelYall 3 года назад +8

    Amen!! I am a nurse and if I were not already a believer in God I sure would have became one after taking anatomy and physiology in college. I do not see how any person, let alone an educated healthcare provider or biologist, could not believe in God. We are so infinitely complex it is mind boggling.

  • @cousinbryan3007
    @cousinbryan3007 3 года назад +8

    Where was this filmed? This collection of the history of computers looks amazing.

  • @mimelnaggar
    @mimelnaggar 10 месяцев назад +2

    Wow, this video on intelligent design is truly impressive! The presenters have done an excellent job presenting their argument in a clear and convincing manner. Their insights and explanations make a strong case for intelligent design. I appreciate the effort they put into this presentation. Well done!

  • @Hernsama
    @Hernsama 3 года назад +5

    How do they not have more subscribers?

  • @kennykennysson1077
    @kennykennysson1077 3 года назад +3

    I wish this was translated to arabic since my parents don’t understand the english language.
    This man has alot of good and vital information that my parents would love to listen too.

  • @josephscala6707
    @josephscala6707 3 года назад +9

    It's like our science took a vacation at Disneyland.

  • @jimborowy8160
    @jimborowy8160 3 года назад +29

    Praise God! This is an awesome video that encapsulates the complexity of life which is absolutely depending on a loving God!

    • @RichAbe23
      @RichAbe23 3 года назад +1

      Yes indeed... gem of a video.

    • @theothertroll
      @theothertroll 3 года назад

      A “loving” God? Yet this same God hates as well ~

    • @albertgainsworth
      @albertgainsworth 3 года назад +1

      There is no need to think that the intelligence behind all life is benign. The life of most animals, including ourselves, is usually quite unpleasant. We do the best we can to live a happy and comfortable life, but luck has a huge part. We get no help from the Great Designer. Not in our lifetime, anyway.

    • @jimborowy8160
      @jimborowy8160 3 года назад +1

      @@albertgainsworth Dear William, sorry to hear that your faith is in doubt. Your description is one of the fall of man as sin entered the world.

    • @richardlewin9282
      @richardlewin9282 3 года назад

      You can't possibly be taking about the God of the Bible. The monster of the bronze age 😂

  • @estribat4
    @estribat4 3 года назад +6

    Thank you, amazing !!

  • @cameronwalker294
    @cameronwalker294 3 года назад +3

    One of the arguments I've been using for quite a while now is that two of the greatest minds, who were evolutionists, didn't believe in evolution; ie Steven J Gould and Sir Francis Crick. Gould came up with Punctuated Equilibrium and Crick postulated Pan-Spermia.
    The question I ask is, why? Why do two of the most brilliant men who purport to be evolutionists, feel the need to come up with theories that are radically different from from Darwinian Evolution? There is only one reason that makes sense to me; these men understood that the evidence does NOT support Darwinian Evolution; if the evidence did support it, why would they need to come up with such different ideas?
    To me, that's proof, without having to go into all the details, that evolution is false.
    So I brought this up to the teacher teaching a class called Science Denial and he insisted that Punctuated Equilibrium wasn't a radically different theory at all, that Gould was just 'tinkering around the edges' of the theory.
    Question: how should I answer such a statement? The idea that rapid evolution in isolated environments, over and over, such that we never see the evidence strikes me as ridiculous on it's face. But he couldn't, or maybe wouldn't, see it.
    I'm willing to entertain that maybe I'm the one misunderstanding Gould's theory. I don't see how, but I am at least willing to hear a statement that makes more sense than some hand-waving like 'tinkering around the edges'.
    Thoughts?

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 3 года назад +4

      Cameron Walker. Hi. Where on earth did you get these strange ideas? Surely a little bit of internet searching could have prevented this shambles?
      1. Eldridge's and Gould's Punctuated Equilibria model and the older Phyletic Gradualism model are simply alternate ways to explain how natural selection proceeds. PE envisages stasis, with occasional rapid events (cladogenesis) while PG holds that steady and gradual transformation is the norm. Debate continues. NEITHER model denies evolution by (mainly) natural selection . To even suggest that Gould "didn't believe in evolution" is perverse, to say the least.
      2. Panspermia is an old idea. Crick's and Orgel's deliberate panspermia version was a new twist, way back in 1973. 20 years later they retracted this view in the light of greater knowledge of how RNA worked.
      Anyway, a moment's thought would lead to the realisation that the origin of life on this planet is a red herring. However it occurred, it clearly did and how it did had NOTHING to do with what happened next. Natural selection can only operate on populations of living organisms.
      Hoping that clarifies things a little.

    • @CJFCarlsson
      @CJFCarlsson 2 года назад

      Because Darwinism (it seems that term upsets the Darwinists, who prefer "theory of evolution") does not align very well with the evidence. They need to invent mechanisms that better explains the mechanisms. That is science. (While not abandoning the original theory, which shows Darwinism is not science).

    • @marcusmuse4787
      @marcusmuse4787 5 месяцев назад

      the foundations of science were laid down by believers and they probably hate that fact.

  • @ibartobotes6896
    @ibartobotes6896 3 года назад +7

    Love it, God is amazing! Thanks for the video it's always a blessing to watch 🙏🏼

  • @guylelanglois6642
    @guylelanglois6642 11 дней назад

    I sure wish more people would take time to actually listen to what's said in these videos.

  • @tanglediver
    @tanglediver 3 года назад +2

    Bravo!!!

  • @d.c.9854
    @d.c.9854 Месяц назад

    Outstanding video, presentation and unbiased delivery!!
    1 Corinthians 2:13-14
    These things we also speak, not in words which man's wisdom teaches but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

  • @RichAbe23
    @RichAbe23 3 года назад +13

    6:02 this part of the video clip made me yell out in praise for my awesome God. “Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!” Romans 11:33.

  • @zodraz5637
    @zodraz5637 3 года назад +19

    ""A fool says in his heart "there is no god", "" says God!

    • @pt4963
      @pt4963 3 года назад +1

      Amen! 👍

    • @sodaht2296
      @sodaht2296 3 года назад +2

      A fool believes things based off no evidence

    • @richardlewin9282
      @richardlewin9282 3 года назад

      The funny thing about religion is you can flip the argument around 180 and you always arrive at the TRUTH. Project much?

  • @carolinemcgreal2382
    @carolinemcgreal2382 3 года назад +16

    Only the blind say their is no creator, He is there and I for one am glad and thank Him for all He gives to us, and praise His Holy name Yahuha or YHWH.

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 3 года назад +6

    Even with the popular ideas of asking are we simulations actually in fact admits creation. No we are not simulations we where meant to love what created us.

  • @wernerotti6712
    @wernerotti6712 3 года назад +1

    Amen !!!

  • @tissosweet....8638
    @tissosweet....8638 3 года назад

    Can you guys do a research about those Sistine chapel ancient wall painting claims to be 12500 years old? I would love to know the experts view on that. Thanks

    • @Jack-Kaiser
      @Jack-Kaiser 3 года назад +2

      You might want to check out this video from Answers in Genesis. ruclips.net/video/FWlErubudcE/видео.html
      Infering human population over time from the Y-chromosome family tree, and then comparing that to evolutionary-paradigm human population over time. Allowing a rough evolutionary paradigm human ages to creation paradigm human ages. Using the chart from 19 minutes and 30 seconds, 12,500 years old become 4,100 to 4,200 years old.

  • @davidreda1211
    @davidreda1211 2 года назад

    The hardest thing for the mind to accept is that life happened by chance, that there is no purpose in life.

  • @OlegTirsina
    @OlegTirsina 3 года назад +5

    I loved this episode. Thank you. And thank God for all that He's done!

  • @antonbotha3808
    @antonbotha3808 3 года назад +2

    What time is the start

    • @leonardu6094
      @leonardu6094 3 года назад

      It literally says 1pm on the banner

    • @antonbotha3808
      @antonbotha3808 3 года назад +1

      @@leonardu6094 thank you 😊

  • @nosegrindv4951
    @nosegrindv4951 3 года назад +10

    "God doesn't believe in atheist's." - Ray Comfort

  • @chrisken8902
    @chrisken8902 3 года назад +1

    Not only the world and all the species have to live and work together ... everything has to be created from NOTHING !
    Now, take that !!!

  • @JVONROCK
    @JVONROCK 3 года назад +2

    Consider the eye.

    • @davemuckeye
      @davemuckeye 3 года назад

      Atheists will say they are mutated skin cells… 💁🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @vanillasky1726
    @vanillasky1726 3 года назад

    I love you

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 8 месяцев назад +1

    Actually the skull is the warmth

  • @GeoCalifornian
    @GeoCalifornian 3 года назад +2

    Intelligent Bio-Engineering Design is validated all day every day through synthetic biology.
    /Oh Irony! -you always do show up!

  • @KelseyPruett
    @KelseyPruett 3 года назад +5

    That’s so cool!! Thank You Jesus that You are real and alive!🥰✝️ amen

  • @billperez1141
    @billperez1141 3 года назад +2

    Thanks guys. Keep sharing these truths as long as possible. Who is like The Lord, from everlasting to everlasting HE IS GOD and there is no other... AMEN !!! Everything about The GOD Of Jacob is awesome beyond any man's imagination. (P.S. WARNING !! : have recently learned that Theistic Evolutionists are now teaching that there is "GOOD" in current human nature which came into being by the process of evolution). This makes me cringe when I hear someone claim that people (within themselves) are good at heart.

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 8 месяцев назад +1

    The cell is recreating

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 8 месяцев назад +1

    Do u understand my visoon

  • @lastofthemohicans1
    @lastofthemohicans1 3 года назад

    Count how many times the word paradigm is said.

    • @chrise842
      @chrise842 2 года назад

      No other mohicans left anymore?

    • @lastofthemohicans1
      @lastofthemohicans1 2 года назад

      @@chrise842 only one

    • @chrise842
      @chrise842 2 года назад

      @@lastofthemohicans1 not even procreating

  • @christopherdeboer1500
    @christopherdeboer1500 3 года назад

    What I want to know is this...is This intelligent designer designing and operating in the universe?....or is the universe somehow more intrinsic to this designers being?

    • @CJFCarlsson
      @CJFCarlsson 2 года назад

      The universe would be essentially different, in-time and incorporate from the creator timeless and incorporal, so it can be imagined and argued, but from what little we understand less likely, and going on what the incorporal and outside of time being says Himself. This is an object and separate from Him.

  • @user-xo2iw8rx3s
    @user-xo2iw8rx3s 3 месяца назад

    You showed us a large sun with small planets and that sun would fill our sky.

  • @bryanburnside9783
    @bryanburnside9783 3 года назад +1

    Great video. If you are addressing a believing audience. But, so much left out. Which is also the case with the Genesis account. He mentions information multiple times. But, never explains why information theory is crucial. The fact is; all that is, is information. Therefore fundamental to a functional universe. That information must have been present at creation since information is conserved and all information begins as thought. No where is this fact addressed in evolution or any other "science".
    The comparison to computers is interesting. But you failed to mention that even the tiniest life forms functions on a quantum computer level. Many levels of complexity above anything man has ever built. Explained by the Penrose-Hameroff theory of micro-tubual transmission of quantum code. Life is and always has been in direct communication to the creator. I firmly believe the entire universe vibrates in tune with the divine down to the Planch level and can explain how God did it.
    The arrogance of Academics who insist on their particular "understanding" while dealing with maybe 1x 10 to the -1000000 of all that can be learned ( a complete exaggeration, it is probably far less) will always dumfound me.

  • @Imjustsayin99
    @Imjustsayin99 3 года назад +1

    Or as Richard Dawkins has proposed: an intelligent alien life form seeded our planet... it just can’t be God.
    But then how did the alien come to be?

    • @spatrk6634
      @spatrk6634 3 года назад +1

      i think his point was that there are alternatives on how human life couldve came to be.

  • @tonyputman3398
    @tonyputman3398 3 года назад +7

    Billions of years ago there were rocks and water then after "time" human beings evolved from that. Does that sound crazy? It is!
    In the beginning God...

    • @alanthompson8515
      @alanthompson8515 3 года назад

      Billy. Hi. OK. A supernatural creator is a possibility -
      In the beginning God - but how does that negate later evolution? Who are we to know the mind of God?

    • @sodaht2296
      @sodaht2296 3 года назад

      Looks like you don't understand Evolution at all

    • @mugdiller2124
      @mugdiller2124 3 года назад +1

      @@alanthompson8515 Great question Alan! How can we know the mind of God? According to Jesus we can't, unless we are born from above. When we are, the Holy Spirit indwells us and we are able to understand the Word (greek, logos - information) of God given to us in the Bible. Therefore, if Adam and Eve were symbolic and evolution is true then Jesus would not have had to die a literal death to pay for a fallen creation. So to believe in evolution and the Bible is inconsistent.

    • @rougebaba3887
      @rougebaba3887 3 года назад

      @@sodaht2296 What is "Evolution" then?

    • @nunyabisnass1141
      @nunyabisnass1141 3 года назад

      Ummm...no. you're describing spontaneous generation.

  • @bugnfront
    @bugnfront 3 года назад +1

    Today, we have BioQuantom Transportive Simplex Array Transducers and are racing towards Singularity Series AI. The Great Reset has as it's ambitious goal of combining human and machine..ie "Transhumanism". We currently have some in experimental modes and applications in a limited capacity! AI models are currently duplicating themselves in a limited re programming so to speak in music via Audio mathematic sequencing in a somewhat self expressive display. Klaus Swabb has coined the "next stage of human evilution as "the 4th. Industrial Revilution". The "global Kaabal" has envisioned this "4th. Industrial Revolution " as the unfoldilding at this time in history and they are determine to bring it to existence over the next few years!

    • @dr4391
      @dr4391 3 года назад

      The great reset guys are setting up the biblical tribulation period which begins AFTER the rapture...when the antichrist signs a peace treaty w Israel.

  • @mattyrose8937
    @mattyrose8937 3 года назад

    No. Next question please.
    Seriously though, personal incredulity is not a valid argument.

  • @cookedchicken7913
    @cookedchicken7913 3 года назад +2

    Hey guy you should also talk about how the ages of Adam and his decendants are valid and aren't symbolic.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 3 года назад

      @Chuck D Truth only creationists are devolving.

    • @anlockcharacter1104
      @anlockcharacter1104 3 года назад

      @@theshadow4737 according to research atheists lives shorter dude haha your devolving . . . . Sad

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 3 года назад +1

      @@anlockcharacter1104 according to research most claims according to research are fake.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 3 года назад

      @Chuck D Truth first provide evidence of Adam existing and living up to that age , then we talk.

    • @tonyputman3398
      @tonyputman3398 3 года назад

      @@theshadow4737 The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. Proverbs 9:10

  • @terryquarton3864
    @terryquarton3864 3 года назад +1

    Mother nature is the most awe inspiring part about living on this planet. Read the book The greatest show on earth and then you will see the light.

  • @socmin030
    @socmin030 3 года назад +3

    Why didn't we find other "intelligent" life forms so far? Why will we never find any? Because there might no other than us in this universe. And this can't happen by chance imo so the moral is that it has been designed. You just can't look at our planet's nature and presume it all happened by chance... PRAISE THE LORD❣🙏🏼✝️⚓💜📖🙏🏼

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 3 года назад

      imagine that in order for you to been born you parents need to meet, their parents needed to meet, their parents needed to meet and so on. Now either this happened by chance or there is no free will.

    • @socmin030
      @socmin030 3 года назад

      @@theshadow4737 Well, if you want to compare it like this you are oc free to do so. Imo these are 2 completly different topics. I wrote about God, you wrote about humans. Hope you get my point.

    • @tonyputman3398
      @tonyputman3398 3 года назад

      @@theshadow4737 False dichotomy!!

    • @socmin030
      @socmin030 3 года назад

      @@hansdemos6510 That is a good question! Been asking this myself for years, came to the conclusion that if we do find other life, it has to be "intelligent". Some form of micro organisms or bacteria wouldn't make me lose my faith. I was a naturalist for 35 years before returning to Jesus and this question still remains...

    • @socmin030
      @socmin030 3 года назад

      @@hansdemos6510 All good, no worries. Intelligent to me means for example being aware of the fact that we have to die someday. I believe that animals have a body and a soul, but only humans have a spirit which is why a lot fear death. So no, the kinds you mentioned wouldn't make me abandon my faith...

  • @davidreda1211
    @davidreda1211 2 года назад +2

    Praise God for the mighty Orca(killer whales) that torture their prey before killing & eating them! Praise god for the praying mantis & the black widow spider for killing it's mate & then eating it after mating! Praise god for the younger male lion, who, after dethroning his predecessor, will now kill all of the predecessor's cubs! Yes!!! Praise the Creator for designing these marvelous creatures!!! Hmmmmm, I wonder just how many more "marvelous" creatures are out there with similar or even worse attributes?, but hey, Praise be to God!

  • @richardlewin9282
    @richardlewin9282 3 года назад +1

    NO that was easy. If all these questions are this easy I could be super creationist 👍😵🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑

  • @bakkerem1967
    @bakkerem1967 11 месяцев назад

    This all oozes 'too complex, so .. God'. Why make that jump, and not another jump ? Why not state 'we don't know' but we're investigating ? There are loads of errors in the 'design of the human body'.
    Millions of diverse species ? How manu species were on the Ark ? Was that also 'millions' ? The ark was too small for that.
    For every human that ever lived there are one to two complete galaxies in the Universe (with billions of stars, and a multitude of planets around them). If you have an answer to why the design is created by a intelligent mind, what's your answer to that ?

  • @TentoesMe
    @TentoesMe 3 года назад

    And don't even MENTION the cause of Australia! 🤣

    • @chrise842
      @chrise842 2 года назад

      Poisonous animals came out of other forms after the fall.

  • @theshadow4737
    @theshadow4737 3 года назад

    The "286" is a CP/M machine.... event that they could not get right.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 3 года назад

      @@hansdemos6510 it is what the card says, so in that case I stand corrected. Perhaps it is something I do not remember as in my memory the 286 already came with a 10Mb hard drive instead of two floppy disks. Might be that the US version still was delivered in this configuration.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 3 года назад

      @@hansdemos6510 as my father had a tax business he bought a Triumph-Adler CP/M machine for Eur 10.000, ith 64Kb RAM and two floppy drives. That was my first comuter. From that we went to a Tulip 286 with already 128Kb and one oppy with a 10Mb Harddisk. Even had Windows 1.0 on it which was kind of useless. Fun to think a modern watch has more power than those even if they did provide a full accounting rogram, word processor and spreadheet. Good times.

    • @theshadow4737
      @theshadow4737 3 года назад

      @@hansdemos6510 remindsme of my first programming achievement. In our administration program there was a time display, but it did not refresh. According to the programmer tat could not be done. One week later there was a menu shell for all program created by yours truly with a running time display. Nothing is impossible you just need to look at it the right way.

  • @randyd9805
    @randyd9805 3 года назад

    Intelligent design is undeniable to any rational person. When I was 20 and working with the Marines as a Navy Corpsman, I believe God used His design to convince me that he does in fact exist. I would walk into exam rooms and there would be very detailed pictures of things like the human eye, ears, skeleton, nervous system, and other things on the walls of the rooms. The human eye stood out to me in particular for some reason. I began to think about not only how incredible our anatomy and physiology was, but how other things in nature just didn't make sense without a Creator that allows life to exist on earth. I was agnostic at the time. During this time God gave someone to witness to me from Isaiah chapter 53 and the Holy Spirit of our Creator convicted me that not only did God exist and that He had created us, all living things, and was responsible for all the complexity of nature, but that He had sent His Son the Lord Jesus Christ to earth by the virgin birth and so our Creator became a man. A perfect and sinless man.
    He was called the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Christ took all our sins upon Himself on the cross and shed His innocent blood as a substitute in our place. He took God's wrath for our sins upon Himself and paid for every single sin ever committed by all mankind. God says now that if you will believe that and admit you are a sinner who deserves God's wrath and that you are trusting in what Christ did for you on the cross of Calvary, God will forgive all your sins past, present, and future. God will give you eternal life as a free, unmerited gift by His grace. No amount of good works, rituals, church going, or anything else you can do will get even one sin forgiven. It is only by the shed blood of the innocent Lamb of God that you can be forgiven and cleansed of your sins. You can never deserve salvation from hell. It is by God's grace through His virgin born Son, the Lord Jesus Christ and Him alone. I trusted Him as my Savior and to forgive my sins back in 1977. Guess what, I STILL am forgiven and I know I will only have eternal life based on what the Lamb of God did for me on the cross.

  • @godexists2177
    @godexists2177 3 года назад +6

    Nano machines inside my cells. God is amazing 🙏

  • @robertredditt704
    @robertredditt704 3 года назад

    Stop uploading old clips. It gets me every time. 🤦🏾‍♂️

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 8 месяцев назад +1

    Think GOD i have broke the earth

  • @michaelboyd636
    @michaelboyd636 3 года назад

    Wy if a gamer ray hits this amd you robot are shout curets you out and you just is as bad CREN

  • @marcusmuse4787
    @marcusmuse4787 5 месяцев назад

    microevolution is intelligent design it shows us how Noah had only kinds on the ark that became all the different species we have today.

    • @ozowen
      @ozowen 2 месяца назад

      Nope

  • @rethinkscience8454
    @rethinkscience8454 3 года назад

    DNA might be the processing language of this mind. God

  • @PR-cq4zc
    @PR-cq4zc 3 года назад

    God is Real

  • @jeffreycavanaugh840
    @jeffreycavanaugh840 3 года назад +1

    NO GOD NO COMPLEXED LIFE ESPECIALLY THE GENETIC CODE AND CELLS PRAISE GOD

  • @User0809205
    @User0809205 3 года назад

    The idea of evolution being a failed theory because it doesn't incorporate the reality of design, and that the number of puzzles that have come up between Darwin's time and now has evolution in crisis is a laughable mischaracterization to make in 2020. Evolution is as real as gravity(1), and more certain(2). We even know enough about our own development now that fun little top 10 lists about our evolutionary quirks show up on sites like Smithsonian.(3)
    I'll remind Dr. Nelson that the reason they teach evolution in schools the way they do (in public schools, at least) is in no small part because of the decision in 2005's Kitzmiller v Dover Area School District trial. In his ruling, Judge Jones (a Republican appointed by George W. Bush) said that "ID fails on three different levels, any one of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science." Those levels are stated as "invoking and permitting supernatural causation," employing "the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980s," and "ID's negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community." Jones added, "it is additionally important to note that ID has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community, it has not generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it been the subject of testing and research."(4)
    In researching this response, I found that Dr. Nelson's own statements on intelligent design's shortcomings were used in testimony in the Kitzmiller trial, when the following quote was presented as a demonstration of the ID community's awareness that it is not a theory in the scientific sense: "Easily, the biggest challenge facing the ID community is to develop a full-fledged theory of biological design. We don't have such a theory right now, and that's a real problem. Without a theory, it's very hard to know where to direct your research focus. Right now, we've got a bag of powerful intuitions and a handful of notions, such as irreducible complexity, but as yet, no general theory of biological design."(5)
    That begs the question for Dr. Nelson: In the last 16 years, how did we get from "We don't have such a theory right now" and "ID fails on three different levels, any one of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science" to "evolution is in crisis" and "get a better theory that incorporates design"? Please show your work.
    References:
    - (1) thisviewoflife.com/evolution-is-as-real-as-gravity/
    - (2) evolutionnews.org/2018/04/why-evolution-is-more-certain-than-gravity/
    - (3) www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-top-ten-daily-consequences-of-having-evolved-72743121/
    - (4) en.wikisource.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District
    - (5) ruclips.net/video/x2xyrel-2vI/видео.html

    • @User0809205
      @User0809205 3 года назад

      PS - I genuinely didn't know about Dr. Nelson's connection to the Kitzmiller trial until after I had written the section about Judge Jones's decisions. I was just responding to the arguments on their own merits. But that was like watching a special on the news about the government illegally selling arms to other countries, and the contributor they have is saying things that sound so ridiculous that you end up looking it up to see if this Oliver North guy even knows what he's talking about. There are some really compelling contributors to Is Genesis History?, which I'll continue to try to learn from, but unless there's new evidence on this, the ruling on Dr. Nelson stands.

  • @geraldjohnson8871
    @geraldjohnson8871 3 года назад

    God i.e. Jesus Not only designed Us but he also gave us the way to live Eternally in his Grace, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. And gave us the Will to decide if we want to live Forever Or Suffer Eternally. Two Choices But Only One Way to Salvation aka Christ Jesus.

  • @stevendelucas6311
    @stevendelucas6311 3 года назад +1

    With the makers of these videos, one can argue that no, intelligent life does not exist in nature.

  • @sodaht2296
    @sodaht2296 3 года назад +3

    Answer: No.
    Intelligent design is a baseless religious claim

    • @theothertroll
      @theothertroll 3 года назад

      Your statement is myopic ~

    • @sodaht2296
      @sodaht2296 3 года назад

      @@theothertroll completely accurate you mean

    • @techstuf4637
      @techstuf4637 3 года назад +3

      I.D. is based on countless observations. Random darwinian evolution was a lot easier to swallow back when the simplest unit of life, the single cell, was assumed to be a simple micro packet of primordial goo. It has since been shown to be comprised of myriad nano machines all acting in perfect harmony, and with fantastic, intelligent, purpose.
      Blessings in Yeshua, Jesus Christ

    • @sodaht2296
      @sodaht2296 3 года назад +3

      @@techstuf4637 ID is pseudoscience.
      It has never been observed.
      It has nothing to do with any facts or reality

    • @sodaht2296
      @sodaht2296 3 года назад +2

      @@techstuf4637 Evolution however is completely supported by many fields of science.
      Nothing in science supports ID

  • @joealcamo8901
    @joealcamo8901 3 года назад

    Of course it does, God made everything.