Why can’t we just get an order from the United States Supreme Court that outright bans states from prohibiting semi-automatic rifles once and for all? I’m so fed up with this constant back-and-forth!
I'm with you 100% my friend...I'm been screaming that same thing for YEARS !!! The constant back and forth "motions" , "orders" and appeals is sooooo damn FRUSTRATING... WHY can't the Supremes just make a final , plainly worded ruling that just simply states...ANY bans on ANY semi auto rifles is illegal and just be done with it...this fighting over vague wording goes on ENDLESSLY ?!?!?
It's mind blowing We get a win They changed the words Spend millions fighting for 3 to 5 yrs and repeat Not just something from SCOTUS but make it punishable offense to make an unconstitutional law or something there has to be away to stop the crazy. It too time consuming and costly
That is correct, because if you read the definition of armaments it literally says military weapons and equipment ... ams-armaments.... end of discussion. Live uninfringed
True. But I don’t think they’ll go against themselves. Any decision against the second amendment now would be going directly against their own decision in Bruen.
WHY, does Tic Toc, a relatively NEW case when compared to most 2A cases in the system, get a cert hearing and the 2A cases geet passed on? The SCOTUS may say no rights are second class but their actions belie their words. Fact is, whether for philosophical objections or the swamps fears of an armed populace the entire legal system, aside from a few shining lights here or there, is biased against that particular right. Avoiding the truth of the 2A erodes the value and confidence of the society in the courts, and indeed in the concept of justice itself.
I’ll one up you. Ca DOJ is messing paperwork up somewhere in my file. I can buy guns all day long but get denied when purchasing ammo. No one can figure out why.
Fingers crossed in R.I. And they are looking at an assault weapon ban right now….they don’t quit. I don’t want to have to move, but will have no choice. Wish the courts could put the spurs to this asap.
Unfortunately, common trend has been for the states ignoring Supreme Court rulings, if the executive branch isn’t going to step up and enforce the law, kind of pissing in the wind
Exactly. The tyrants in the deep blue states don't give a damn what the SCOTUS says. The Justices issue "rulings." Pronouncements without teeth. The tyrants simply tweak the law a little and the years-long process starts all over again.
There's a oath to uphold and defend the constitution, every representative as well as law enforcement take the same oath, any and all arms laws/restrictions whatsoever is absolutely a direct violation of the oath they took in order to hold office or put that badge on, violation of oath of office is a crime against we the people, for some reason, nobody bothers to enforce the only arms laws that can exist under the constitution, the right to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed. Violation of their oath is literally treason, its a blatant betrayal of the constitution and their country, if we the people demand violation of oath of office be enforced, that will be the end of this fight for our rights that should have never been even heard in congress, much less still being recognized a hundred years almost later.
Even if the outcome is in our favor, states seem to be able to just disregard SCOTUS rulings and just make an executive decision to disregard SCOTUS with zero repercussions.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon nor questioned. That's how the second amendment should have read. And if it did it would have solved the whole debate once and for all.
Man scotus was real quiet with all these pro 2A rulings until trump got elected. I guess better late than never but damn that just shows how fickle these people are.
PLEASE SUPPORT THE LAWSUITS. FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, etc. Gray v Jennings would have been nice. Hopefully we can get preliminary injunctions as a standard for Second Amendment cases from Snope or Ocean.
Tired of them demding back to State where it goes to original court, 3 judge panel, en banc, back to SCOTUS, back to state......etc, etc, etc, on and on! We the People are the ones who need to take our rights back with our 2nd Amendment rights.....peasants with pitchforks!
As a law abiding citizen I am pissed off… In my state I can’t buy a handgun with more than a 10 round capacity… That is sub standard for most handguns nowadays…. My rights are infringed… This needs to be fixed
Yeah yeah yeah…. Keep the gears spinning. Keep feeding the money hungry lawyers on both sides. Neither side wants a decision to end it all. Why stop the money train?
It shouldn't take them very long or very much effort to review the magazine band cases under theBruin analysis. But I guess we will see what they do. I still find it difficult to understand where the words shall not be in fringe are so difficult to comprehend, especially by such brilliant scholars.
Can you inform everyone of the Oregon HB3075. It is the same thing as Oregon MB114 but much worser, and it goes into effect once the governor signs it.
At first I was rooting for the SCOTUS to review the cases at the end of September. But after kicking the case down the road I don’t have much faith they’ll take the case
“A” citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust), the constructive, cestui que trust of the U.S. Inc, under the 14th amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US inc.”Congressional records June 13th 1967, pp. 15641-15646. Does any one know what this means
Every person born into the U.S gets issued a SSN to assign them as another debt holder to leverage the U.S debt. The moment you're labeled a u.s citizen you're essentially now assigned about $1million of the current U.S debt. Thats the absolute most basic cliffnote description i could give
How do i contribute to the case trying to overturn the lifetime ban for paperwork felons like the guy trying to get a few more food stamp bones?? I dont have a felon problem but i have been fortunate to make some very good bank and i would like to pass one day knowing i paid a small part in quashing the federal felony gun ban. If anyone knows i am all ears. Thx WAK.PHD
Will this help with what is happening here in Colorado with the Tom Sullivan assault weapons ban here in Colorado they are trying to ban all semi automatic firearms here in the state the only one it wouldn’t ban is the marlin 22 semiautomatic rifle with the tube magazine but this would ban just about any weapon semi automatic
I love the info you put out and keeps all of us to date thank you for the info. However I don’t like the commercials I understand they pay you. And it the nature of the beast. Everyone is dining it now.
It is frustrating that the Supreme Court process is slow and deliberate, but that is by design. The Justices must select a case that represents an issue for the entire country and not just one state. A case goes to the Court after winding thru local, State and Federal appeals courts which can take years or decades. The Court is the final stop for justice; ideally states and Congress should resolve issues and differences between states. Only 35% of US citizens are gun owners, and gun owners historically have a low participation rate with political advocacy or voting. So, 65% of Americans don't care about gun rights, or are against the 2nd amendment. It would help if gun owners contributed more to political advocacy, support 2nd amendment organizations, or at least voted in elections. Taking a passive attitude and just waiting for the Supreme Court to solve the problem may eventually work, but you will be waiting a long time.
Could it be that the case is re-listed so the court's clerk's can research the case to make sure it doesn't have any technical flaws such as jurisdiction? Yes, I'm the smartest person in the room. (some of you will get that reference, many of you might not) 😎
Support the channel by liking the video and subscribing!
As someone who is currently living in Illinois this is extremely important and not just for Illinois but the entire country
100%
Seems your late bunch of dissents in May v bonta and vampire rules Hawaii
Tell me about it, I'm in Assachusetts. We have the worst anti 2nd laws in the country.
Also IL resident we have worse 2a laws then cali
NY ain’t much better
Shall not be infringed should be enough.
I'm old enough to have no faith in SCOTUS. They have been Lucy with the football for far too long.
@@todaylets2583not only that. It could be ruled in favor of the 2nd amendment and other law makers will just disregard it
Why can’t we just get an order from the United States Supreme Court that outright bans states from prohibiting semi-automatic rifles once and for all? I’m so fed up with this constant back-and-forth!
That makes to much sense and would be too cheap
I'm with you 100% my friend...I'm been screaming that same thing for YEARS !!! The constant back and forth "motions" , "orders" and appeals is sooooo damn FRUSTRATING... WHY can't the Supremes just make a final , plainly worded ruling that just simply states...ANY bans on ANY semi auto rifles is illegal and just be done with it...this fighting over vague wording goes on ENDLESSLY ?!?!?
They don't have balls.
We have weak leaders.
It's mind blowing
We get a win
They changed the words
Spend millions fighting for 3 to 5 yrs and repeat
Not just something from SCOTUS but make it punishable offense to make an unconstitutional law or something there has to be away to stop the crazy. It too time consuming and costly
The “assault weapons” ban in all states needs to end now!
That is correct, because if you read the definition of armaments it literally says military weapons and equipment ... ams-armaments.... end of discussion. Live uninfringed
Especially when the arms they call “assault”, are definitely not.
100% agree with you folks
@@alphagt62 Even the army calls its modern rifles "battle rifles" which are not AR-15's.
I have zero faith in SCOTUS to do the right thing here...
True. But I don’t think they’ll go against themselves. Any decision against the second amendment now would be going directly against their own decision in Bruen.
But how will red flag Bondi F us over?
@@Toypainter1 She won’t.
Roberts and Barrett have been huge disappointments in their rulings that I don't expect much from SCOTUS in protecting our rights anymore.
WHY, does Tic Toc, a relatively NEW case when compared to most 2A cases in the system, get a cert hearing and the 2A cases geet passed on? The SCOTUS may say no rights are second class but their actions belie their words. Fact is, whether for philosophical objections or the swamps fears of an armed populace the entire legal system, aside from a few shining lights here or there, is biased against that particular right. Avoiding the truth of the 2A erodes the value and confidence of the society in the courts, and indeed in the concept of justice itself.
Let's go SCOTUS! Don't let us down!
🇺🇸👍
They were real quiet with all these pro 2A rulings until trump got elected but I guess late is better than never
Don’t count on them most courts are just corrupt as the rest of the Government
AGAIN !
Seems they Never get tired of 'Kicking the Can' .
It’s January 15, 2025 and I can’t purchase constitutionally protected items in CA.
They found that guns made the fires worse and are banning more now
I’ll one up you. Ca DOJ is messing paperwork up somewhere in my file. I can buy guns all day long but get denied when purchasing ammo. No one can figure out why.
Me either! So TIRED of it!
Not sure if this should get likes or dislikes 😬
move
Let me know when this actually happens.
Fingers crossed in R.I. And they are looking at an assault weapon ban right now….they don’t quit. I don’t want to have to move, but will have no choice. Wish the courts could put the spurs to this asap.
Same in Colorado.
Unfortunately, common trend has been for the states ignoring Supreme Court rulings, if the executive branch isn’t going to step up and enforce the law, kind of pissing in the wind
Newsom and Bonta!
I will velieve it when it actually happens ..I have heard so many times that SCOTUS stopped a ban, but the ban stays in place
Exactly. The tyrants in the deep blue states don't give a damn what the SCOTUS says. The Justices issue "rulings." Pronouncements without teeth. The tyrants simply tweak the law a little and the years-long process starts all over again.
Constitutional Carry in all 50 states without NO Restrictions that how it suppose to be
The fact that the tic toc case got ahead of all these 2A cases just shows the government as a Whole could NOT GIVE A SHIT about our Rights
Good Evening from Central Illinois and thanks for the update.
2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A
🇺🇸👍
There's a oath to uphold and defend the constitution, every representative as well as law enforcement take the same oath, any and all arms laws/restrictions whatsoever is absolutely a direct violation of the oath they took in order to hold office or put that badge on, violation of oath of office is a crime against we the people, for some reason, nobody bothers to enforce the only arms laws that can exist under the constitution, the right to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed. Violation of their oath is literally treason, its a blatant betrayal of the constitution and their country, if we the people demand violation of oath of office be enforced, that will be the end of this fight for our rights that should have never been even heard in congress, much less still being recognized a hundred years almost later.
2025 the year of Freedom!
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
The supreme court needs to give non violent felons gun rights back.
Many get them reduced. Try it. Gotta jump through hoops. I cow train with a few that have and now carry concealed
It’s just a revolving door at this point…one case goes…and that same case comes back
I'll tell you what's happening absolutely nothing,sorry anthony,same shit over and over!!!!😮🤔👀
Even if the outcome is in our favor, states seem to be able to just disregard SCOTUS rulings and just make an executive decision to disregard SCOTUS with zero repercussions.
Thank you for the update.
So..... what was the win again??? The more back and forth???
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon nor questioned. That's how the second amendment should have read. And if it did it would have solved the whole debate once and for all.
The founders could never have foresaw this country becoming this stupid and corrupt.
as the constitution writes it, if the federal government can buy it, so should its citizens
When is SCOTUS gonna get off their ass & hear the "sensitive places" gun grab?
Fingers crossed. And thank you for the info
Fingers crossed!
🤨Our Forefathers made it simple.!!! SHALL NOT INFRINGE.................Period 🤔
Im praying. God please return our rights here in WA
Rhode Island's governor just announced that he'll be aggressively pursuing a new AWB this year, so hopefully these cases have an impact soon.
Great job sir. Thanks for sharing 👍
Well it happened again, my guns and magazines got burnt up in the California fires 😁😁😁😁
Thanks Anthony....#1
First comment today!
Just Remember Folks, the Jury box is the final reasonable determination of our rights!
I thought it was the ammo box
Two words: jury nullification
“So we have some very imporn updates..” gets me everytime 😂 0:00
Man scotus was real quiet with all these pro 2A rulings until trump got elected. I guess better late than never but damn that just shows how fickle these people are.
PLEASE SUPPORT THE LAWSUITS. FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, etc.
Gray v Jennings would have been nice. Hopefully we can get preliminary injunctions as a standard for Second Amendment cases from Snope or Ocean.
All these changes and nothing is actually changing ., Supreme Court makes law no one enforces WE THE PEOPLES law. How’s that work
SCOTUS doesn't make law,congress and the executive do.
A right delayed is a right denied , the fact they delay anything so import for a single day is detrimental to our nations promise
Tired of them demding back to State where it goes to original court, 3 judge panel, en banc, back to SCOTUS, back to state......etc, etc, etc, on and on! We the People are the ones who need to take our rights back with our 2nd Amendment rights.....peasants with pitchforks!
As a law abiding citizen I am pissed off… In my state I can’t buy a handgun with more than a 10 round capacity… That is sub standard for most handguns nowadays…. My rights are infringed… This needs to be fixed
Thank you for this valuable info!
Yeah yeah yeah…. Keep the gears spinning. Keep feeding the money hungry lawyers on both sides.
Neither side wants a decision to end it all. Why stop the money train?
Thank you for the update!
It shouldn't take them very long or very much effort to review the magazine band cases under theBruin analysis. But I guess we will see what they do. I still find it difficult to understand where the words shall not be in fringe are so difficult to comprehend, especially by such brilliant scholars.
Only a lawyer could possibly think you make your best decisions late on Friday.
The supreme court should be made to hear all cases. But they can pick and choose because We the people have no oversight of them.
Komifornia here. Al gorithyms fueled. Thanks for the update. CRPA member. Cmon SCOTUS
The highest court in the land . That manages to do nothing. CSSCOTUS Chicken 💩💩💩 court !
Can you inform everyone of the Oregon HB3075. It is the same thing as Oregon MB114 but much worser, and it goes into effect once the governor signs it.
Fingers crossed
🇺🇸👍
It's been a looonnngg time coming
Thanks for the update 😊
Howdy All ! 4 the rhythm ….
Howdy uncle mike!
@@ArmedScholarSir
Round and Round and Round
At first I was rooting for the SCOTUS to review the cases at the end of September. But after kicking the case down the road I don’t have much faith they’ll take the case
Thanks Anthony
Reminds me of the description of TF2’s “Team Captain” hat:
“Our Lawyers say ‘YES YES’”
Hello Al
“A” citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust), the constructive, cestui que trust of the U.S. Inc, under the 14th amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US inc.”Congressional records June 13th 1967, pp. 15641-15646. Does any one know what this means
Every person born into the U.S gets issued a SSN to assign them as another debt holder to leverage the U.S debt. The moment you're labeled a u.s citizen you're essentially now assigned about $1million of the current U.S debt. Thats the absolute most basic cliffnote description i could give
Most excellent.
You might want to tell Colorado all this news
✨️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✨️✊️
Let’s go!
🇺🇸👍
Thanks bro
Let's Go!🎉😊❤
Thank you, again!!
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
That's what I say about all the bill of rights we have. They are a do not touch order to all governments in the usa
Thank you
Fuel the jet! Fuel the jet! ⛽️ 🛩️
You are Super AWESOME!! X
Comufornia needs some help all the way around Trump 2025 🇺🇲🇺🇲
Just as the other branches of our government, I really doubt they will rule in the best interest of the people.
Nice!
🇺🇸👍
Have a good week
Yet again.. I wasted 9:51 of my life..
In!
Doesn’t seem like this is a difficult ruling to make -pretty frustrating that our rights are being trampled while it’s figured out
How do i contribute to the case trying to overturn the lifetime ban for paperwork felons like the guy trying to get a few more food stamp bones??
I dont have a felon problem but i have been fortunate to make some very good bank and i would like to pass one day knowing i paid a small part in quashing the federal felony gun ban.
If anyone knows i am all ears.
Thx
WAK.PHD
Nice MKC shirt, love their knives!
FJB
Sleepy Joe smokes poles…
Will this help with what is happening here in Colorado with the Tom Sullivan assault weapons ban here in Colorado they are trying to ban all semi automatic firearms here in the state the only one it wouldn’t ban is the marlin 22 semiautomatic rifle with the tube magazine but this would ban just about any weapon semi automatic
I favorable decision on the 20th would be EPIC!!
Wow an actual update
I love the info you put out and keeps all of us to date thank you for the info. However I don’t like the commercials I understand they pay you. And it the nature of the beast. Everyone is dining it now.
Great.
🇺🇸👍
SLOW DOWN.. PLEASE!!!!
It is frustrating that the Supreme Court process is slow and deliberate, but that is by design. The Justices must select a case that represents an issue for the entire country and not just one state. A case goes to the Court after winding thru local, State and Federal appeals courts which can take years or decades. The Court is the final stop for justice; ideally states and Congress should resolve issues and differences between states. Only 35% of US citizens are gun owners, and gun owners historically have a low participation rate with political advocacy or voting. So, 65% of Americans don't care about gun rights, or are against the 2nd amendment. It would help if gun owners contributed more to political advocacy, support 2nd amendment organizations, or at least voted in elections. Taking a passive attitude and just waiting for the Supreme Court to solve the problem may eventually work, but you will be waiting a long time.
I need Cliff Notes
Could it be that the case is re-listed so the court's clerk's can research the case to make sure it doesn't have any technical flaws such as jurisdiction?
Yes, I'm the smartest person in the room. (some of you will get that reference, many of you might not) 😎
I feel like realist of the two covers the one.
Who cares about SCOTUS.
First
Edit: wasn’t first, was 3rd 😮
I was 9th, but I saw ya up ahead!
Almost!
Comment for the algorithm
Nothing changes.
2A.
MAKE MACHINE GUNS LEGAL AGAIN!
⛽️🚀 🇺🇸
⛽🚀