SOVEREIGN CIDIOT MOTION HEARING…THIS TIME HE BROUGHT “COUNSEL”!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2024
- Yet another example of what our courts deal with every day…
Join to support this channel ($2/mo) to get access to priority chat & extra quick clips:
/ @osgcourtwatch
SOVEREIGN CIDIOTS IN COURT: • SOVEREIGN CITIZENS IN ...
KAREN’S IN COURT: • KARENS IN COURT !!!
CRAZY TRAFFIC COURT: • FUN IN TRAFFIC COURT !!!
HAVE YA SEEN THIS ONE YET? • HAVE YA SEEN THIS ONE ...
LAW NERDS ASSEMBLE: • LAW NERDS ASSEMBLE !!
SHORT CHUCKLES: • Short Chuckles...
This remix is intended to provide better insight into how our courts and the folks who run them administer justice to the public they serve. Remember they have to deal with folks who are often having their worst day on a daily basis. We also hope to bring you cases with interesting legal concepts, twists and interactions you may not encounter elsewhere…
This commentary remix work constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted materials under section 107 of the US copyright law. Video was edited only to add relevant commentary and to reduce time in the hopes it will be more convenient to be viewed by more folks thereby raising public interest. All defendants are innocent until they aren’t…officially.
#court #zoom #crazy #sovereign citizen #sovcit #trending #funny #karen #judge #moor 
Развлечения
This is the first time I’ve encountered a SovCit whose vessel really was a boat.
He was not sailing he was travelling., his mouth was running a touch rich. It kept running on.
🤣
😂
best comment on a SovCit video EVER
@@dorrisday1518
You know motors😊
Expired boat registration and boating under the influence…so it’s Admiralty Court, right? 😂😂😂
I spit my Pepsi out when I read your statement.
If found guilty, he walks the plank.
Sounds pretty maritime to me. Lmao
😂😂😂😅😅😅😂😂😂
captain goes down with the ship 🛳
as a first nation individual, i totally hate when any of our people try to get away from crimes by saying that they are
Yeah riiight 😂😂😂😂
I think I understand. I’m disabled, and I loathe it when people either lie about being disabled, or use their disability as a ‘card’. There’s enough discrimination already, without idiots like this!
If you’re part of an indigenous tribe and exempt from…whatever…wouldn’t that be the first thing out of your mouth when you get stopped? This “they didn’t give me time to tell them” defense has more holes than a sieve.
would be if it was me!
Dude must have been too drunk to think of it
So, why did he even have an expired registration if he didn’t ever need one in the first place under tribal law? So confusing.
There could be lots of reasons. He may only be able to operate without registration on specific waters. Or only while engaged in a protected activity (e.g., fishing, hunting, or gathering food), but not while engaged in others (e.g., water skiing). Or maybe he bought the boat from someone who previously had it registered.
Yeah, I didn't hear any testimony that he was fishing or not fishing. @@unnamed_channel
@@unnamed_channelSo regardless, he was operating on an expired registration in an area where it was required.
@@unnamed_channel Similar for some sovcits who are found to have a driver license, but didn't produce it because they claim they're not required to unless they're operating "in commerce", which is not an actual motor vehicle or automobile law anywhere.
@@MotherMeece I haven't heard enough to know that that's been established. IF he's a member of the tribe and IF tribal members are exempt from registration when engaged in a protected activity, and IF he was engaged in that activity on waters where it's allowed, then it wasn't illegal for him to operate the boat in those waters without registration. But even if true, that doesn't mean the cop did anything wrong when he assumed that that the guy was required to have registration, because that's the norm, and not needing registration is the exception.
The guy’s defense is a six-second video? You could take any arrest video where the suspect resisted and find a six-second clip where the suspect wasn’t resisting. The real question is, why did he submit only six seconds? What’s on the rest of the video that he doesn’t want the court to see?
hopefully we find out at a later hearing!
He thinks "resisting" means "fighting." He doesn't want to show the longer segment of the video when he doesn't obey lawful commands (which is "resisting"). He only wants to show that he wasn't physically fighting them when they grabbed him.
@@alisong2328 The judge is not stupid - If he thought the video was insufficient he would have said so .
The judge is not stupid - If he thought the video was insufficient he would have said so .
@@user-ol9qu7zi7oAre you the defendant’s boyfriend? Sounds like you two have been dating for awhile, so which one of you where’s the chaps and gun belt when you two cosplay? 🤡🤡
Judge, you can hold yourself in high esteem. You gave the defendant every legal break and very good advice.
Sooooo, native tribal laws says it's okay for the natives to boat drunk??? Can they also "travel" drunk in their cars??? Ridiculous.
No, this treaty evidently says that the person must be tried by the tribal court, not the state of Michigan court.
The President of the Oglala Sioux was charged with a DUI in 2020. Also, I’m sure they’d just loooove this guy appropriating their heritage as a means of refuting his own OWI. What an entitled piece of human garbage. Grow up, accept responsibility, and do better!
Sioux tribe? he would have to be a registered member, for one, and, for another, whatever the professor was talking about, that treaty would have to cover that tribe he might be trying to claim membership to. more Sov Cit BS. its a ticket. pay the damn ticket.
3k court fees vs 150 traffic ticket
The choice is easy my guy, who wouldn't want to take the fight to the courts for absolutely no benefit?
No, "Sue Tribe". A long line of litigious idiots who think they know the law better than judges.
Yeah he'd have to be a registered member and then it might maybe possibly (if you squint real hard) have some sort of applicability but only if he was ticketed/arrested by a federal agent on tribal land.
Even then, the most that would happen is that he'd be tranferred to a tribal court where they would, in all probability, be much less lenient.
He has a tribal card for Sault Ste Marie of Chippewa Indians is my guess. Most of us that live in Cheboygan are a part of that tribe.
He tried to use it as a way out of his tickets. I wouldn't think that is a good look.
Holy cow - this "expert" is something else... constant hearsay. "I'm pretty sure, based on these things I've read, that I'm right." Really solid argument there, chief.
He wasn't a kook. The judge had his ears wide open listening to the witness. If the judge accepts him as an expert witness (a technical term) then it becomes incumbent upon the prosecution to bring forth their own expert witness to rebut his testimony
Typical of someone is full of shit.
Dr. Bellfy is Professor Emeritus of American Indian Studies at Michigan State University
@@judylapointe3507he’s a QUACK . And I’m a 40 yr expert in shoelaces, maybe they should call me as an expert.
This whole case is a joke and so is this quack judge. He’s enabling these sovcitz behaviors. They do this to waste time and tax payer money so the judge just gives in and the criminal gets his way. All charges dropped . It’s a game they all play. And the system allows it . I need to remember to play the sovcitz card if I ever get arrested . Take everything to trial, waste as much time and court money as possible til they just agree to let me go and throw the case out.
My thoughts exactly, I think the prosecution needs to bring in their own expert witness for this trial. The prosecutor was not prepared well for this hearing, IMO.
Somehow, the fact that this man was accused of Impaired Operation of a Vessel was lost and forgotten .....until the excellent judge reminded everyone.
People can, and do, die because of drunk boating.
I can only wonder if this is unusual behavior for this person. It would surprise me, if this was the ONLY time he ever did it.
Probably only time he got caught. DBoaters are like DDrivers it only is counted when they get caught.
I think we can all agree that this sovtard has driven and went boating under the influence many times. I say this based on his entire idiot-ideology. He (they) are incapable of seeing the true reality of life. They live in a self-forced delusion.
A coworker of mine and his daughter were nearly killed by a drunk boater. Life jackets are the only reason they survived.
I grew up on the Ohio River. I knew of several deaths due to drunk boating, not to mention three sunk boats. Boat owners would get drunk and pass out leaving the boat to float down the river only to run over by a barge, known as the "Black Death" because you couldn't see them at night, and you didn't hear them until it was too late. Thank goodness they are finally enforcing the drinking while operating a boat laws.
Tribal native Americans are permitted to row their canoes whilst intoxicated.
"Have you seen me walk before?" ... also known as the Captain Jack Sparrow defense.
Believe it or not that’s actually a legit fair question to ask. Not the best but not the worse to ask. You’re simply trying to poke holes in an argument
No one should be allowed to drive or operate a boat while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
A sovcit and his vessel... story old as time... lol
🎵 Tale as old as time,
Tune as old as song,
Bittersweet and strange,
Finding you can change,
LEARNING YOU WERE WRONG!🎵
Nah, they'll NEVER admit they were wrong!! 🤣
Love it when the “witness” gets snotty about it being “doctor” when both the Judge and the Prosecutor are also Doctors.
A Juris Doctor degree is technically a professional doctorate. But unlike other Ph. D. holders, lawyers don't hold the title of "Doctor." Instead, they can choose to use the title "esquire," which is shortened to "Esq." and is fashioned after the lawyer's name.
@@voiceofreason9238lawyers don’t chose to utilize their title as “doctor” mostly because they lack the arrogance and self importance of an academic professor. Off campus, that title means little.
So if you are a Native American you can drink and drive a boat, have expired registration, & resist arrest. Good thing I’m part Blackfoot Indian.
I now identify as a Navajo Chief. Going to the dock bar tonight.
I thought Dr. Dellfy said that he had been involved in court cases before. Why did he not know that he had to sit behind the bar? Surely someone who has done it before would be familiar with basic court etiquette.
Dr. Bellfy is Professor Emeritus of American Indian Studies at Michigan State University
@@judylapointe3507he’s a quack that’s what he is . Nothing more
This may have been the first time he was asked to serve as “counsel” for a pro se defendant. So he might not have known that he couldn’t sit at the table with the defendant.
He said he'd been involved din _Tribal Court_ cases as counsel. I guess they have different seating arrangements or etiquette.
Omg!! The irony of having an officer named Bourgeois has me rolling!! 😂😂😂
You should see the other deputies Laissez-Faire (the one with the attitude), Souffle (The rising star of the department) and desk Sargent Dejavu (who has one of those faces).
Dude had a decent potential argument. Too bad he pissed it away playing games.
agreed!
Sovtards, never want to admit they are ahead (of their script). The script, must play out to its conclusion
Or was to stupid to have a real lawyer make the agreement
Live from the bathroom, it's Office Bourgeois!
🤣🤣
Lucky for him, the only psycho was the "expert" witness, so the shower curtain was never torn aside for a stabbing.
What do you mean by that?
@@lisawatson9570 There appears to be a shower curtain behind the officer, like he joined the Zoom call from his bathroom. It may just be a curtain, but my first thought was 'shower curtain'.
@@fieryweasel I’m wondering if he they hung up a shower curtain as a sort of impromptu privacy screen, not that he was actually in the bathroom (which would be funny).
So he brought his fake "attorney" with him this time?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yes, he's arguing that "counsel" is his right, but skipped the part where the state law only allows LICENSED attorneys to practice law in court. Each state has its own specific definition for "practice of law".
I can’t even believe he told a judge his attorney doesn’t need a license. This is too much
I hope they broadcast the trial. I'd be interested to see what happens.
Everyone that claims tribal should have to take a DNA test
💯% 🎯
I believe the federally recognized tribes keep birth records of tribal members. You can't just claim to be a member of the non-exisant Bazinga tribe. The federal government has a list.
It is up to each tribe to decide who is and isn't a member.
There are black tribal members who have no native blood. (And many that do have native blood) These were descendants of slaves held by the tribal members. They gained tribal "citizenship" when the tribes outlawed slavery. These slaves were sometimes living on reservations under tribal law. Some were with their masters on the Trail of Tears.
This has been a contentious issue within the tribes, with some black members having to sue in federal court to retain their status.
As for "White" tribal members, most of them are descendents. They have one Indian in their ancestry. But again, it is up to each tribe to determine who is a member. In one case it was matri-lenial (I can't spell it today, through the mother.). The children of men with the non native wives were told to leave.
Why? Being in a tribe does NOT MEAN YOU CAN BREAK THE LAW. Really nobody cares who’s an Indian . They have to follow laws too. When they don’t they go to prison . Which is why most of them are criminals . Some of the worst kind
@@glynncordry5965 Tribes who now run casinos which promised to pay profits to their tribes have now redefined who is and who isn't tribal. Some folks who were granted tribal membership and have lived on tribal land all their lives because they were 1/16 or 1/32 tribal have been denied tribal membership so that the casino can share monies with fewer people. Corruption isn't just a white man's disease.
"It's not called that, but that's what it is" 🤣 I love bananas even though most sheep call them apples
He's pointing out how the language has changed. American Indian, Native American, Indigenous People. He used the terminology that was used when he got his degree and when he was teaching. So, yeah, they don't call it that, but that's what it is.
He is probably alluding to the "euphemism merry-go-round". As PC shifts things get relabeled despite feelings if those being relabeled.
"Indian" was the first term used to distinguish Natives from Non Natives. They never needed a word for it before contact.
American Indian is used to prevent confusion with people from Deli.
Native American still has American in it, as does Amerid.
First Nation avoids having them named after India or an Italian explorer.
But all the renaming might be irritating to those who have been calling themselves Indian for centuries.
@@glynncordry5965 The people at OUR Deli are usually Ashkenazi.
No way the court of appeals is taking this up
my opinion as well Jason!
You'd be surprised, I've read of them taking up cases that were very stupid and even ruling on them and then on cases that were serious and they ignore them.
@@Suisfonia Courts of appeal generally don’t want to micromanage the decisions of the trial court, so it is pretty rare for them to accept an interlocutory appeal (that is, an appeal of a pre-trial decision of the court, such as whether to suppress a witness’s testimony).
@@amicaaranearum Except that we've seen otherwise, while it is true that they are NOT supposed to micromanage the trial courts, sadly reality is a different story.
22:43 - Our good friend Chile DeCastro would love this! Isn't getting Terry v. Ohio overturned like the main cornerstone of his whole crusade? The driving force behind his entire reason for being???
On Law Talk With Mike's stream of this we dubbed him Chief Running Mouth. What a clown.
Was that this morning's stream?
I have mixed feelings with Law talk with Mike's channel. Half of me is laughing my ass off. Half of me is ashamed for such a disrespectful joke. See you there tonight.... I am such a child. ... That is so funny!!!
That was a hoot‼️😹😹😹 I'll tell ya the lack of accountability and self entitlement of some people is actually terrifyingly frightening. I hope I never have to encounter an individual like this.
Law talk with Mike is a grifter who waits for people like OSG to edit content together, just to play the same content, mixed in with constant interruption and shouting out morons sending him money for just laughing over other peoples uploads.
@@matthewmartin1852 You're right. My addition to your fair point is that ALL the court watcher types do that, rip content from each other. It's sometimes interesting to watch not just the first guy to post, but to the unique comments from all the other people and their respective comments sections.
Oh shit! He was actually in a vessel!
first amendment auditors are just as hilarious
Put all sovereign citizens on Pitcairn Island the furthest area from civilization they can travel all they like down the few roads it has. I'm not sure how the locals will take to them they have a reputation for taking no nonsense.
Pitcairn Islanders have a reputation for statutory rape. I'm not sure they have a reputation for anything else.
This looks like a good one! Thank you OSG!
This is great footage, Judge is a Boss!!!
😸Ol' Squishy😼 your thumbnails are underrated, absolutely savage!!! I too formulate my own vocabulary hilariously to describe certain situations or characteristics of lacklusterin' cluckheads😹😹🤭 Job well done🏆🎖️🏆
thanks for the very kind words Roxanne!
Just because you're a tribal member doesn't mean it's a free for all, they have their own jurisdiction when it comes to tribes, doesn't mean it's everywhere
I’m glad you did the follow up with this case.
I was curious.
Hope you can cover the jury trial as well.
interesting because i think this is the first time ive ever seen someone call an expert witness who isnt an expert on anything.
Professor Bellfy is possibly a relevant "expert" on something he has been teaching for 40 years at various universities, and used in his law practice in the Chippewa courts.
Im sure thats why he thinks the state cant police people just because theyre indians. Thats literally something he testified to under oath. I seriously doubt his own words and any online source that attempts to credit any "expert" status to him. @@UpnorthHere
I know it's a real place but Sheboygan always sounds funny to me lol
And then Officer Bourgeios shows up😂🤣
The title should be "Sob idiot shenanigans in Sheboygan '
This guy doesn't seem like a sovereign citizen. He was participating in the trial and recognized the courts authority.
Gosh...law is sooooo easy....why do we even need lawyers?
But remember, he’s a Doctor! 😂😂😂😂
LOL...good point!!@@ScottW-vz4bf
I'm guessing this is finally under "Maritime law"? 😂
Not even close, although it certainly COULD be. That would generally be a federal court.
When someone insists you call them Doctor, you no they are not a real doctor.
You say that....
I worked at a telecom company and one of our customers was a physical a few hours away, always insisting we called him 'doctor' before his name. "I spent the time to earn this degree I deserved to be addressed as such" was the entire issue. So we'd always call him 'mister' NAME just to annoy him since he was a nightmare of a customer
Or they a Chiropractor
@@onemorething100So not a real doctor
Not always. Private physicians cans be just as demanding
And McLeod keeps calling his own witness Mister.
Thank you OSG
Looks like he's another pretendian. Maybe he could call Buffy St Marie as a character witness.
Well, looks aren’t the determining factor…’cause Buffy sure ‘looked’ the part.
I meant "looks like" in the sense of "it would seem that" but, yes, her look was a very carefully crafted image combined with her southern Italian genetics. @@karenneill9109
I am puzzled by so many people claiming to be Native American who are obviously not.
How is it obvious that he isn't a Native American?
Exactly how is that obvious?
Similar mentality as confronting people who don't LOOK LIKE they're disabled when they've parked in a spot marked as reserved for the disabled. YOU don't know: not all legally qualified disabilities or Native American criteria are easily visible.
@@UpnorthHere great analogy.
Ohhh would love yo see the followup on this. Great job OSG!
It's rare but I love when the judges reactively laugh in their faces!
Wow, Trevor has a CARD....,It allows him to do whatever he gets a PERMIT FOR.....Wish I had a card.....
😂😂😂 It’s his NAMBLA membership card!
I'll sell you a card, twenty bucks. And YOU get to pick the tribe. 😎👍
What kind of expert witness is that? Total crap.
15:10 - "I have a PH.D in American Indian Studies. . . It's not called that, but that's what it is." Be aware folks. That second statement was NOT talking about the subject matter of his PH.D. He was talking about his so-called "degree"! In other words, he does NOT hold a doctorate in diddly-squat! He knew he had better add that little disclaimer considering he's under oath right now! Wonder if the ADA picked up on this. . .
(edit): A few people below checked, and it looks like I am wrong in my assumption. Apparently, the man does indeed hold a PhD. My bad!
good callout Wally!
According to LinkedIn it's on the up and up, it states he has a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) American Indian/Native American Studies and he is the Professor Emeritus of American Indian Studies at the same university. I didn't hear anything establish his expertise in modern legal matters, as he seems to be research focused but that's on the prosecution.
I have a bachelors degree in Psychology but it's not called that. It's Bachelor of Arts in the department of social science, something like that. After you graduate nobody cares what it's called, including me. :)
Dr. Bellfy is Professor Emeritus of American Indian Studies at Michigan State University
Good point. 😊
oof this is rough, a good DUI atty would have destroyed the states witness. poor sov cit cant see past his own ignorance.
Excellent comment
Did they get him to blow or anything?
Based on what we heard today, it does sound sketchy. Does show the value of having the right assistance, qualified DUI attorney vs Ph.D expert in tribal law.
@@millipediche is really focusing on the wrong argument. Not that I think he’ll win either way.
Dr. Bellfy is listed on both the Michigan State U and Northern Michigan U as professor emeritus and as an enrolled member of the White Earth Band of Minnesota Chippewa. His expertise doesn't seem to be directly related to the matter. He lectures on the history and experiences of indigenous people along the border and on environmental issues. I'm not sure how that applies to boating while impaired.
It doesn’t, period the end.
He wasn't testifying to drunk boating as this hearing was a motion to suppress. He was testifying that there exists a tribal treaty which brings legal jurisdiction into question, which IS directly relevant if his testimony is correct and the defendant is a member of a tribe which is a part of that treaty.
It isn’t relevant to the issue of whether he was boating while impaired. It is potentially relevant to the question of whether the officer had a right to stop him for having an expired registration, since the U.S. has allowed members of certain tribes to fish without needing a license or registration - but that exemption only applies while they are fishing. If he is boating but not fishing, he would still need a valid registration.
That being said, it’s pretty rare for courts to accept expert testimony on what the law is. I think the court was trying to accommodate a pro se defendant.
@@amicaaranearum Yes, a well-prepared prosecutor at trial may have his own legal briefs on the actual "law" on that issue, or it may come up in the interlocutory appeal process.
Too much leniency!
"Before you act, it’s Prudence soberly to consider; for after Action you cannot recede without dishonour: Take the Advice of some Prudent Friend; for he who will be his own Counsellour, shall be sure to have a Fool for his Client."
Man, this judge is super lenient.
I don’t know what tribal law says, but the judge seem to accept what they were saying. The denial was that there was no probable cause for the stop.
The officer only needed reasonable suspicion, since it was just a _Terry_ stop at the time that he saw the expired registration. This is a pretty low standard, so it’s difficult to get evidence thrown out on the basis that the _Terry_ stop was unconstitutional.
8:03 I like how the judge basically tells the lawyer how do I ask the question to get around his objection?
So Bellfy requires the Judge to refer to him as Dr.; yet his sovcit refers to him as Mr.
Now there was a rare occurrence in a pro se situation, a sustained objection!
I guess that it’s true that even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Hi Squishy! Good afternoon.
I love your videos. Keep up the great job. I hope you didn't tooken the wrong path. :)
“No one in this court can interpret the decree.” So, according to him, he can make any claim he wants about immunity to absolutely anything based on the decree, and the judge isn’t allowed to rule that it’s not covered.
At least he’s being charged as an adult.
In court, they lose sight of the fact, that an officer is going to impound your boat, transport you to a medical facility for a blood draw, basically jack your day up good! Hell, my fine motor skills are gone, because of my poor feet! So, am I a target for these young officers at every opportunity they observe me outside my vehicle? YES
Wait… so did he actually hire a professional, to talk about something that had absolutely nothing to do with his dui case? Wonder how much he was paid for the day, and if it was more than what the judge is making him pay?
In theory, if the original reason for the encounter was not an actual violation (creating the necessary reasonable articulable suspicion,) due to treaties or the like, the remaining evidence may be excluded. It wasn't, for reasons explained.
An attorney would know he has to inform the court of his presence or whatever the term is. First thought, he just grabbed a home boy and brought him in as an "attorney". LOL
the term you may be looking for is "filing an appearance" on behalf of the client.
Yay !Finally an actual vessel !.
He actually had an objection sustained, so he's ahead of all the other sovt@rds.
Squishy! Missed you. Hope you're well.
I’d be interested to see that video. I doubt six seconds tells the whole story. I wouldn’t have stipulated to it as the prosecutor without it being authenticated (I.e. a witness such as the defendant would have to take the stand and say that it was a fair and accurate depiction of what happened).
Seems like they'd need the bystander who took the video to testify as to its authenticity as well as its original length, noting any editing they may have taken place. Seems to me this was just a snippet and not the entire confrontation.
@@ScrypKat56 Did the prosecutor drop the ball on that argument? Now it's admitted, it will be presented at trial, but not clear whether he can THEN raise the same issues he could have raised now.
@@UpnorthHere just because it’s admitted at this hearing doesn’t mean it’s admitted at trial
My god, a sovcit case that really is about a vessel!
WHY did the judge tell him he can call his friend as an expert witness? Expert witnesses are experts in something relevant to the case... How is his random friend qualified to be an expert witness?
Good thing the defense didn't hear the contradiction. He would have gotten out of that one
All their legal arguments can be summed up in one word “Nuh huh” and “can too” it’s so juvenile to say the least.
A SovCits special offer, a Sovcit plus council, 2 idiots for the price of one.
"Council" turned out to be an "expert witness" for an important issue in the case, so there's that. That "idiot" appears to have published numerous monographs and compendia in his field, so I'd go lightly on the insults in that direction.
As a brit it is nice to watch americans civiliy discuss an issue. Why cant this nice, patient judge run for president and represent the US? also.... i dont see how this man is a SovCit? he is just a man representing himself trying to get out of a charge. cheers.
Yeah, I'm only halfway through and I haven't heard anything from the SovCit playbook yet. Maybe there's something from his previous appearances? So far, all I'm seeing is him somewhat challenging jurisdiction, but with a potentially effective argument if he'd had proper legal counsel.
@@PitifulDelay Yes, unlike some post-office frauditors who stupidly believe that local police can NEVER have arrest powers on federal property. Sure, it sometimes happens, and the trespassing case is dismissed in state court, but your lawyer might advise you not to get your hopes up.
Again!! Loving this OSG! Keep on keeping on my dude!! I'll keep iking and sharing if you keep putting it out!!!! Thank you for doing the digging for us!!!
On the drinking charge, he thinks because he is a native that he can operator a motor boat drunk ?? That's new to me.
Love this judge.
Marine law not working for them 😂
Drunks are all the same
It seems the judge is the attorney fir the guy who was drunk. 😂😂
My dad has had several hip replacements and walks like he is drunk. He doesn’t drink. He gets accused too
Do NOT ask open-ended questions on cross!
So NAs are allowed to boat while intoxicated putting other boaters at risk without responsibility?
Should make for an interesting trial.
12:39 Captions read "voting under the influence..."
Wait…… he was actually operating a vessel 🚢 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I have artificial hips and I have issues with my right hip and I don’t walk drunk!
I have 7 seconds of me getting arrested!! 😂😂😂 What a total a-clown!
“Dr”. I’m sure he’s a Chiropractor
you would be wrong
In my line of work I encounter dozens of these bozos a week … they get a certificate from a their local Community College and all of a sudden they’re PHD’s. 😂
@@ScottW-vz4bf This "bozo" appears to have achieved a PhD at MSU in 1995 and used his MA in sociology to land a job teaching at Michigan State University for over 25 years and another 11 years as Professor Emeritus, among other university teaching credentials. -- LinkedIn
The cop may be a newer officer with the DNR, but he seems like he must have prior experience and isn't new to testifying in court.
Yeah, DNR is a dream job as far as officers go, Can be hard for a rookie to get into. He probably had a good record as a correction officer or as a city cop
Good judge
You can tell unhonnerable people. They try every angle too try and get away from the fact they did something wrong. I mean really. get honest. You got caght, own up and take what you diserve instead of trying to weezle out of your punishment like a child.;
He’s gonna appeal this order???? It’s his right… but what a waste of resources
Thats the game
Also, showing a video that cuts off right before you commit a crime doesn't prove innocence.
I feel like calling this guy an idiot is a bad move. The judge even said he is doing a good job.
The problem with his 6 sec video is we do not know what previously happened. He could have been resisting not on video and then he agreed to be handcuffed and did not resist.
Defendant is an idiot, but there is one point I've often seen that gripes me. The officer talks about cuffing while not complying - that is, not putting his arm behind him. Then he describes the situation as the officer pinning the guy to the ground with his other arm under him. So, with his arm pinned under him by the weight of two men, how can he possibly "comply"?
This is painful! But hilarious. 🤣 he never did establish the "expert's qualifications properly. Why the judge let him get away with that I don't know.
If he gets a good DUI attorney he might have a shot at trial
Is the judge supposed to assist the defendant by giving legal procedure ?
No, but the judge was going out of his way to be fair to a pro se defendant. I have no problem with that.
While pro se defendants are technically held to the same standards as attorneys, in practice, judges will often try to accommodate them as much as they can (within reason). They won’t give them legal advice or explain how to practice law, but they will often give some basic instructions on court rules or procedures.
why is the microphone so close to the keyboard. We hear every stroke being made.