Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Inside the StuG III with Hilary Louis Doyle | Arsenalen Swedish Tankmuseum
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 авг 2024
- Inside the StuG III with Hilary Louis Doyle.
Hilary has written several books about German tanks. Panzer Tracts covers the history of this weapon combination. You can seach on his name and Panzer Tracts to find more information about his books.
Don’t forget to subscribe!
Follow us on:
/ arsenalen.sverigesfors...
Instagram: arsenalen_strangnas / arsenalen_strangnas
Website: www.arsenalen.se
TikTok / arsenalen_strangnas
Do you want to support us? www.paypal.me/ArsenalenSE
Yay, more awesome stories from Mr Doyle!
Good to see Hilary Doyle still sharing his considerable knowledge regarding armoured vehicles.
What a great relayer of information Mr Doyle is. A true gem
Always excellent uploads from Sweden and Mr. Doyle 👍
I feel like if I met Hilary I could just listen to him talking about tanks for days he is a gem.
it doesn't matter where Hilary Doyle is, even if he's working with the tank museum dorset, the man just loves his german tanks.
great! i enjoy seeing hilary discuss AFVs!
Excellent. As a kid growing up, this was a favorit AFV but at the time, limited detailed history was available. Now Mr. Doyle is a trusted valuable resource.
Inside Hilarys hatch, i love it,
Thank you sir! More please!
Thank you for a fine series of videos with Mr Doyle and your collection.
Always an Outstanding video and presentation by Hilary Doyle.
Alway interesting, the knowledgeable Mr. Doyle!
Thanks Hilary,greatly enjoyed. Love your gym work trying to get to every crew position
Mr. Doyle! Excellent. This restoration is also excellent I might add. Thank you!
Love the videos from Arsenalen!
Thank you. Another excellent video.
Thank Mr. Doyle for his elaborate explanation of the Sturmgeschutz !. Love the long barreled version of this vehicle.
Bravo!
Mr Doyle is truly a great!
Great video!
Very informative. I just had to subscribe.
Great video, I do have one request, I would absolutely love to see what the inside reticle of the gunsight looked like, as a war thunder player I've installed custom realistic german gunsights to the tanks and I would love to see of theyre historically accurate.
I agree it would be nice to have a quick photograph of the sight picture. Stick a piece of white paper in front of the sight maybe an arm's length away for the contrast and to allow light through.
I know it is a damnable nuisance to focus lens through lens, especially modern digital cameras that have auto-focus programming that can be very temperamental, but it would be useful information that tends to be overlooked.
After all, most people will never get to sit in a Stug III's gunner's position, and realizing just how limited the fields of vision armored fighting vehicles have is something more people need to appreciate when making assumptions about how the vehicles could perform.
There is somewhere tne photos of the German gun sights but not all of them! You have to look for the links unfortunately...
I can help with this one..it's a series of triangles. Six with a larger one in center. You use the size of the vehicle in the sites to estimate range.
Natural and informative delivery Hilary. 👍
Every bit as good and professional as the Tank museum videos without the stupid (appeal to the yooff) adverts. :)
Mr. Doyle is an International Treasure. I hope he keeps sticking around for long Time and in good Health!
I really wanna drive up to arsenalen again to see the vehicles i didnt the last time
That version of Stug had no electronic intercom. There was just a flexible voice tube between commander and driver. It's missing from the museum vehicle.
Don't bother with " oh, bugger , the tanks on fire " well done , as always
It’s a bit surprising that the old tube radios could survive the shock of a 75mm gun firing
The ‘3’ is my favourite StuG.
I have to say, this looks like one of the less lethal ‘tank’ interiors. Often it seems as if designers try to cram as many sharp edges and corners and exposed breach recoils as they can.
Great video. Thank you for posting.
Let's build some new ones. Just for the heck of it :-)
...AUSGEZEICHNET!!!!!
Let's not re-write history here. Bohemia, to which the Sudentenland belonged, had been a part of the Habsburg Empire, or Austrian Empire, not the German Empire under Prussia. It had a large German-speaking population, but they had been subjects under Emperor Franz Joseph, not Kaiser Wilhelm. Germany took if, for sure with the 'little help from their friends', Munich Agreement signatories Fascist Italy, France and the UK, but they did not retake anything that had been 'theirs' previously.
He likes to think he knows everything, A God in his own mind
Take back the Sudetenland is just not true Mr Doyle you should select the words better. I am sure this wasnt intended but the Sudetenland never ever belonged ti Gemany (possibly Austria and yes the painter was Austrian). It might have been history but now with recent events.. words are suddenly more important
That area has a rich 800 years old worth of Austro and German history. The Germans which lived in that area and also formed the majority in that area wanted to be a part of Germany and not live under a czech den of thieves and their oppression. On top of that the Czechs also sealed their fate when they parted with the USSR and gave green light to use Prague as a springboard to Germany if ever the USSR would plan to go to war against Germany.
That "conquest" wouldnt happened if the Czech leadership would simply let their feet still by letting the German population have their culture and also not be such best buddies with the war mongering communists which waged wars in europe back then
dude, again same beginner mistake, russia is a far away from where stugs were used in soviet union.
after this, who know maybe he just making up all details on a fly, not from historic records
Do you know who this man is? He probably knows more about German tanks and AFV's than any person living on this planet
@@stefankarlsson9762sorry for bringing this up, again. But it changes a bit general accuracy of information. When providing a huge amount of accurate data and making beginners mistake. I am aware that it it a bed habit to say russia instead of soviet union
Stug's were used throughout the war on all fronts. Russia was no exception and they were not far from Moscow in 1941. Most of the Eastern Front was not even a part of the Soviet Union until Stalin and friends went on a power grab everyone else was busy. Google image search Stug III Barbarossa - or listen to HLD - who is the foremost living expert on German armour.
And to be historically accurate the Germans at the time referred to the Soviet Union as Russia.
@@lilandrydo you get this mad when someone says America and not USA?
@@raseli4066 oh, so you thinking that soviet union and russia is the same country? why don't you say then that m1 Abrams is a British tank because it was made in Thirteen Colonies of British Empire. this is literally a different countries russia was a part of soviet union as well as 18 other republics so you should acknowledge their existence also. during ww2 there was no such country as russia, check when it was formed as independent state and that it wasnt transformed for soviet union as well, russia left soviet union a proclaimed independence, not changed name like Germany did when started calling themselves third reich.
The reason the Irish are so hot on tanks is because they never made any of their own. They didn't even turn up to surrender.