Podcast with explanation of state of Indian women in the past such as this ,is need of the hour for our society not only for Indian men but for Indian women as well
आपको कोटि कोटि नमन जो आपने हमारे प्राचीन भारत तथा उनमें उल्लेखनीय बातों को बताए, आपका हर एक चलचित्र देखता हु बहुत पहले से , पर अंग्रेजी नही समझ में आता फिर भी देखता हु❤
I really wanted a detailed video on this sharing insights to a more deeper level because sometimes it becomes difficult for women to aspire themselves when the number of such representatives are very few! But indeed it’s a good video sir…… always a fan of your books and videos. I also loved your debate in Oxford. Namaskar
सामंती व्यवस्था मैं बेमेल विवाह धनिकों ने किए और पारिवारिक सम्पत्ति को हथियाने के लिए युवा विधवा महिलाओं को तिरस्कृत किया गया। इसके प्रमाण आज भी वृंदावन मैं मौजूद हैं। सत्य मेव जयते।
महाकुंभ जो जाए श्रद्धा से, वो पाए भगवान। जो जाए अभिमान से, वो पाए स्नान। जो जाए नफ़रत से,वो दानव कहलाए। मुल्लासुर और सांतासुर से मनुष्य को सनातन धर्म ही बचाए।
क्षमा करिए। परंतु रंभा और रावण की कहानी में अशुद्धि है। रंभा एक प्रकार से उसकी कुल वधू है, तथा उसने यह बात रावण को बताने की कोशिश की थी। परंतु रावण ने एक बात में सुनी तथा रंभा के साथ उसकी इच्छा के विरुद्ध रमण किया। जिसकी पक्ष नलकुबेर ने उसके श्राप दिया।
Rambha was the wife of NalKubera, son of Kubera, half-brother of Ravan. This is why Ravana was cursed by Nalkubera and he couldn't force himself on Sita ji.
Both the epics are interestingly about restoring/avenging wronged women and thereby establishing rule of the righteous. But your contention that sati started as a response to invasions is contested by the well known Sati of a wife of Sundara Chola after his death and recorded in their own chronicles. From literature it is clear that women who performed Sati were highly regarded and hero stones, shrines were erected in their memory. Also, according to legends multiple wives of Krishna committed self-immolation after his death. However these were regarded as "voluntary" and no force has been mentioned. IMO, the practice predates Islamic invasions and though an exception was regarded highly, glorified, deified and may have been encouraged in some communities. Similar practices were prevalent across the ancient world from Egypt to China so India was not an exception. The British indeed sold the narrative of the uncivilized native in need of colonization to civilize and Islamic invasions may have increased the incidence of sati/jauhar but that does not prove that there was no such practice earlier.
I wouldn't hv made this comment if you woundnt hv mentioned 2 points at the end - One is the R. G. Kar case and second giving advice to Indian Men.. 1) Aap ne toh "politically safe" topic ke upar video bana diye aur R. G. Kar Case ke bare mein bhi ullekh kar diya, kiya aap aaj kaal ke halaat ke bare mein kuch batane ka kasht karenge? Kya aap Atul Subhash ke case ke bare mein batayenge? Aur Atul Subhash ka case sirf ek "trigger point" hain, es case se pehle lakho Atul Subhash hue hain aur en 2 mahino mein bhi bahut saare hue hain... Aam log ye bolte hain ki ek Atul Subhash ka case kya hogaya, saab log bolne lag gaye. Par aap gyani aur accomplished researcher ho, toh ye toh aap acknowledge karoge ki any good research depends on authentic and credible data source not how many reports are shown in media ( for TRP)... Kiya aap NCRB aur NFS ki data ko refer karenge tathyatmak jankari ke liye... 2) Joh nasihat Apne diye ho Bharatiya admi o ko kya aap wohi nasihat Bharatiya Mahilayon ko "directly" de payenge? Bharatiya purush ko "nashihaat" aur "gaali" dono sunne ko milta hain..."Toxic Masculinity" se lekar "Potential Rapist" aur Judiciary se lekar aap jaise vidwaan, gyani log Bharatiya purush o ko toh "itihaas ke panne utha kar" sikhne ke liye bol saakte ho paar kya aap Bharatiya Mahilaon ko wohi "itihaas ke paane" ulatkar kartavya, swabhimaan, gaurav ka path para saakte ho? Kyunki "Sati pratha" ka narrative joh gara giya tha British ke duara wohi narrative ko use kiya gaya Leftist duara wohi "oppressed - oppressor" model mein fit karne ke liye.. Aur Abhi Bharat mein joh ho raha in terms of "breaking family system" well supported by political forces and Judiciary ( there are reasons) that has been theoretically laid down long before by Antonio Gramski and then vividly mentioned in 11 points ( the last point) by Frankfurt School... Toh agar aap ye "Sati" jaise narrative ka istimaal kaise kya ja raha hain at least on 2 broader points - To demean Sanatana Dharma ( that you addressed) and second as I just touched upon - labelling Indian Men as "Oppressor" - can you kindly address this "directly" ( not beating the Bush). Perhaps, then after you can address Indian Men to turn the pages of history and learn...
Sati pratha did exist atleast in my state bengal. We have so many folk tales about it. And a famous place called sati ghat from murshidabad. Medievel bengali texts from tantra and krishna bhakti also talks about sati.
Exactly Sati Daho k myth bolle oi bechari meyeder k opomaan kora. Sobai k to korano hotho na jaar theke sompotti newa joto takei Sati daho kora hoto...else oi meye k bhokkon koratai hoto.
You talk about the Rajashri and sanghamitra They belong to the novel family's current scenario like Indira Gandhi. What about the common people? even the condition is worse in the past.
Then give me the name of any religious book which forms the bases of a civilization like the vedas do for ours, which was written by atleast 1 women. So you'll get your answer.
Amish, I am a fan of yours and really appreciate your views on sanatan....but today at the end of the video, you too, spoke what the mainstream media and propagandist lobby tries to show.... Do you really know the truth of Indian men today ? 60% of suicide are done by men, because Men has no law on domestic violence by women....go to any family court or Mahila Police Thana....you will get to see the real truth of Indian woman....how Indian women are bringing false rape cases, 498A cases against a person and his entire family and demanding crores of Rupees....Atul Shubash is just an example....you may think that these are exceptions....but the numbers dont say so....family courts and mahila police stations are a bazaar today, jaha ek ladka ko bithake legal extortions chalta hain and our judiciary and polticals leaders are all a part of the game.... I am sad and disheartened that you too spoke only what the propaganda lobby tries to establish that Indian men are all devils and Indian women are all victims....criminal has no Gender and crime happens with both Indian both Men and Women.... I am sorry to say that you did the same what our school text books did with us - they propagated the false narrative of the western lobby....
@@praloybratarakshit8685 i am from Rajasthan which was named Raisthan by Col James Tod who wrote history Raithan. Even if I was from Bihar history remains the same.
@@merrybhowmickdas3246 Bharat naam myth kaise he Mahabharat myth ho ya itihas lekin woh book exists toh karti he it is undenyable archeological evidence. Mahabharat matlab Akhand Bharat. lekin merry naam toh Bhartiya nahi he. aapka Bharat se kya sambandh he?
Sir apko ek video banani chahya ki kaisa mainstream media narrative ka ulat Karn sirf greatest warrior hi nahi woh toh the greatest character of Mahabharat bhi tha!,kyuki har ek Hindu ko ya baat realise karni chahya ki kaisa Karn hi Mahabharat ka asli Hero tha,woh video bohat jaruri hai!🔱🕉️
@@Aniedit4 Typical Arjun Fan!,bata kuch jaka Sanatan Supremacy ki videos dakhna suer kar da usna Karn ka upar laga Sara Fake claims jinko Arjun Andhbhakto ka lagai tga un sabko debunk kar diya hai aur raha hai!😍😂😂😂
अंग्रेज इन्होने उन्होने तो किया ही होगा पर भारत के लोग भी भारत के बारे मे अच्छी चीजे नही बतेते इसका बडा उदाहरण आपके शिव के बारे लिखे पुस्तको से पता चलता है। मित्र शत्रु कोई भी हो सकता है ये एक मानवीय स्वभाव है पर केवल मे सही और मेरा ही सच ऐसे किसी का भी कभी भी नही होता
अमीष जी सार्थक और रोचक सत्य उद्घाटक 😊 खैर मैं तो इनकी बहुत बड़ी प्रशंसक हूं. ❤😊
Great job! Excellent!🙏🏽
AhilyaBai, Akhand Bharat ke liye Deviswaroop hai🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Podcast with explanation of state of Indian women in the past such as this ,is need of the hour for our society not only for Indian men but for Indian women as well
आपको कोटि कोटि नमन जो आपने हमारे प्राचीन भारत तथा उनमें उल्लेखनीय बातों को बताए, आपका हर एक चलचित्र देखता हु बहुत पहले से , पर अंग्रेजी नही समझ में आता फिर भी देखता हु❤
🙏
Try subtitles in Hindi
Fantastic topic and podcast. Thank you, Amish!
Thanks sir for taking this topic and breaking the myth around sati pratha....
❤😊
pls make one video on how caste was formalised by the British in the 19th century and how varna was practised in Ancient India 🙏🏼
English has class discrimination that Dick Turpin fought 8:30
There are records of the attendees of the Gurukuls and they show many students from the lower casts.
Amishji many many thanks for this amazing video.
Thank you so much! I'm glad you enjoyed this episode. Do share it with your family and friends.
Excellent presentation with knowledgeable facts.
I really wanted a detailed video on this sharing insights to a more deeper level because sometimes it becomes difficult for women to aspire themselves when the number of such representatives are very few! But indeed it’s a good video sir…… always a fan of your books and videos. I also loved your debate in Oxford. Namaskar
Are aapne toh middle section ko chhod hi diya kya ? 😜😁😆 Maharashtra.. such a supreme video.. ❤
Big fan of your Novels ❤
सामंती व्यवस्था मैं बेमेल विवाह धनिकों ने किए और पारिवारिक सम्पत्ति को हथियाने के लिए युवा विधवा महिलाओं को तिरस्कृत किया गया। इसके प्रमाण आज भी वृंदावन मैं मौजूद हैं। सत्य मेव जयते।
True...😊
U r doing an exceptional job
Thank you so much! I'm glad you enjoyed this episode. Do share it with your family and friends.
Wow!!
Aap ne Ahalya bai Holkar diwas ke liye advocate kiijiye! Thank you 🙏.
Sir is this series available on spotify?
महाकुंभ
जो जाए श्रद्धा से, वो पाए भगवान।
जो जाए अभिमान से, वो पाए स्नान।
जो जाए नफ़रत से,वो दानव कहलाए।
मुल्लासुर और सांतासुर से मनुष्य को सनातन धर्म ही बचाए।
क्षमा करिए।
परंतु रंभा और रावण की कहानी में अशुद्धि है।
रंभा एक प्रकार से उसकी कुल वधू है, तथा उसने यह बात रावण को बताने की कोशिश की थी।
परंतु रावण ने एक बात में सुनी तथा रंभा के साथ उसकी इच्छा के विरुद्ध रमण किया।
जिसकी पक्ष नलकुबेर ने उसके श्राप दिया।
Rambha was the wife of NalKubera, son of Kubera, half-brother of Ravan. This is why Ravana was cursed by Nalkubera and he couldn't force himself on Sita ji.
Nayiki devi of Gujarat she defeated Mohammed Ghori in 1178
Ram Mohan Roy
Was a British supporter and he was crypto christian
We did not understand this
Context matters
We had examples of real feminism not fake feminism like today
Oh really when did you become flag bearer of real feminism ?? Feminism ka f v nhi pta chala hai fake vs real Feminism krne
Perhaps you didn’t mention that in quite a few cases of Sati the main reason was property disputes after husband’s death.
i wonder why you don’t have views even though you have increasing subscribers
Suppressed by leftist google
Both the epics are interestingly about restoring/avenging wronged women and thereby establishing rule of the righteous. But your contention that sati started as a response to invasions is contested by the well known Sati of a wife of Sundara Chola after his death and recorded in their own chronicles. From literature it is clear that women who performed Sati were highly regarded and hero stones, shrines were erected in their memory. Also, according to legends multiple wives of Krishna committed self-immolation after his death. However these were regarded as "voluntary" and no force has been mentioned. IMO, the practice predates Islamic invasions and though an exception was regarded highly, glorified, deified and may have been encouraged in some communities. Similar practices were prevalent across the ancient world from Egypt to China so India was not an exception. The British indeed sold the narrative of the uncivilized native in need of colonization to civilize and Islamic invasions may have increased the incidence of sati/jauhar but that does not prove that there was no such practice earlier.
❤
One podcast should also be made on role of christian missionaries and Raja Ram Mohan Roy in propogating the false narrative on Sati
I wouldn't hv made this comment if you woundnt hv mentioned 2 points at the end - One is the R. G. Kar case and second giving advice to Indian Men..
1) Aap ne toh "politically safe" topic ke upar video bana diye aur R. G. Kar Case ke bare mein bhi ullekh kar diya, kiya aap aaj kaal ke halaat ke bare mein kuch batane ka kasht karenge? Kya aap Atul Subhash ke case ke bare mein batayenge? Aur Atul Subhash ka case sirf ek "trigger point" hain, es case se pehle lakho Atul Subhash hue hain aur en 2 mahino mein bhi bahut saare hue hain... Aam log ye bolte hain ki ek Atul Subhash ka case kya hogaya, saab log bolne lag gaye.
Par aap gyani aur accomplished researcher ho, toh ye toh aap acknowledge karoge ki any good research depends on authentic and credible data source not how many reports are shown in media ( for TRP)... Kiya aap NCRB aur NFS ki data ko refer karenge tathyatmak jankari ke liye...
2) Joh nasihat Apne diye ho Bharatiya admi o ko kya aap wohi nasihat Bharatiya Mahilayon ko "directly" de payenge?
Bharatiya purush ko "nashihaat" aur "gaali" dono sunne ko milta hain..."Toxic Masculinity" se lekar "Potential Rapist" aur Judiciary se lekar aap jaise vidwaan, gyani log Bharatiya purush o ko toh "itihaas ke panne utha kar" sikhne ke liye bol saakte ho paar kya aap Bharatiya Mahilaon ko wohi "itihaas ke paane" ulatkar kartavya, swabhimaan, gaurav ka path para saakte ho?
Kyunki "Sati pratha" ka narrative joh gara giya tha British ke duara wohi narrative ko use kiya gaya Leftist duara wohi "oppressed - oppressor" model mein fit karne ke liye.. Aur Abhi Bharat mein joh ho raha in terms of "breaking family system" well supported by political forces and Judiciary ( there are reasons) that has been theoretically laid down long before by Antonio Gramski and then vividly mentioned in 11 points ( the last point) by Frankfurt School...
Toh agar aap ye "Sati" jaise narrative ka istimaal kaise kya ja raha hain at least on 2 broader points - To demean Sanatana Dharma ( that you addressed) and second as I just touched upon - labelling Indian Men as "Oppressor" - can you kindly address this "directly" ( not beating the Bush). Perhaps, then after you can address Indian Men to turn the pages of history and learn...
Sati pratha did exist atleast in my state bengal. We have so many folk tales about it. And a famous place called sati ghat from murshidabad.
Medievel bengali texts from tantra and krishna bhakti also talks about sati.
Exactly Sati Daho k myth bolle oi bechari meyeder k opomaan kora. Sobai k to korano hotho na jaar theke sompotti newa joto takei Sati daho kora hoto...else oi meye k bhokkon koratai hoto.
Razia Sultana of Delhi Sultanate
There were very few women who wrote the rig veda. What about the proportional justice sir?
Same with the ruler, apart from Rudramadevi and prabhavati Gupta, who else be ruler??
Domingo peas came during the time of vijaynagar time period, is there any post held by women ? Answer is no
You talk about the Rajashri and sanghamitra They belong to the novel family's current scenario like Indira Gandhi. What about the common people? even the condition is worse in the past.
Then give me the name of any religious book which forms the bases of a civilization like the vedas do for ours, which was written by atleast 1 women. So you'll get your answer.
And even Gargi and Maitreyi?@@AGreatRuler
Amish, I am a fan of yours and really appreciate your views on sanatan....but today at the end of the video, you too, spoke what the mainstream media and propagandist lobby tries to show....
Do you really know the truth of Indian men today ? 60% of suicide are done by men, because Men has no law on domestic violence by women....go to any family court or Mahila Police Thana....you will get to see the real truth of Indian woman....how Indian women are bringing false rape cases, 498A cases against a person and his entire family and demanding crores of Rupees....Atul Shubash is just an example....you may think that these are exceptions....but the numbers dont say so....family courts and mahila police stations are a bazaar today, jaha ek ladka ko bithake legal extortions chalta hain and our judiciary and polticals leaders are all a part of the game....
I am sad and disheartened that you too spoke only what the propaganda lobby tries to establish that Indian men are all devils and Indian women are all victims....criminal has no Gender and crime happens with both Indian both Men and Women....
I am sorry to say that you did the same what our school text books did with us - they propagated the false narrative of the western lobby....
Amish thoda pad liya vi koro ,Kisi ka nehi to Rammohan Roy ka naam suna he, history class bunk na kiya ho to
Well can you tell me why he was given title of raja hence sir name Roy or as we spoke rai?
@vinayakscorpion are you from Bihar ? in Bengal it Roy or Ray (রায় in bengali Script , राय in nagri)
Bhai british india se pehle kitne roy hai, woh bhi bta do plz
@@thehindu8461 kyu bhai iska achar dalo ge kiya
@@praloybratarakshit8685 i am from Rajasthan which was named Raisthan by Col James Tod who wrote history Raithan. Even if I was from Bihar history remains the same.
If anyone can say that Ramayana and Mahabharata is myth then all the justification becomes invalid
To Bharat nam vi myth hi hoga,is des ka nam British ane se pehele India tha to kya tha? Ahi puchna chahiye
@@merrybhowmickdas3246 Bharat naam myth kaise he Mahabharat myth ho ya itihas lekin woh book exists toh karti he it is undenyable archeological evidence. Mahabharat matlab Akhand Bharat. lekin merry naam toh Bhartiya nahi he. aapka Bharat se kya sambandh he?
Sir apko ek video banani chahya ki kaisa mainstream media narrative ka ulat Karn sirf greatest warrior hi nahi woh toh the greatest character of Mahabharat bhi tha!,kyuki har ek Hindu ko ya baat realise karni chahya ki kaisa Karn hi Mahabharat ka asli Hero tha,woh video bohat jaruri hai!🔱🕉️
Lol.. Droupadi ko r@ndi bolne wala Karn tha, Duryodhana ko Yuddh ke liye bhadkane wala Karn tha👎
No you are absolutely wrong
@@Aniedit4 Typical Arjun Fan!,bata kuch jaka Sanatan Supremacy ki videos dakhna suer kar da usna Karn ka upar laga Sara Fake claims jinko Arjun Andhbhakto ka lagai tga un sabko debunk kar diya hai aur raha hai!😍😂😂😂
@@Anubhavsengupta1902 you are typical karna andhbhakt
@@Aniedit4Arjun Andhbhakts logic in a Nutshell-
Arjun- Hazrat Mohammad
Arjun Fans- Muslims
अंग्रेज इन्होने उन्होने तो किया ही होगा पर भारत के लोग भी भारत के बारे मे अच्छी चीजे नही बतेते इसका बडा उदाहरण आपके शिव के बारे लिखे पुस्तको से पता चलता है। मित्र शत्रु कोई भी हो सकता है ये एक मानवीय स्वभाव है पर केवल मे सही और मेरा ही सच ऐसे किसी का भी कभी भी नही होता
Somehow you did forget to consider Queen Victoria and Elizabeth. They were significant in English history.
you are doing an exceptional job