Wow, I've always hoped something like this existed, now I know it was done all the way back in 2007. Also, the speaker's audio was higher quality than many zoom talks and this was 13 years ago, apparently they even had people in a video conference.
Interesting, but I think you're not being critical enough. When I "learn programming" I use an app. An app called a "language." And I use typing (typing with a lower case 't.') to program. manually. When I create video game levels, or input forms, I create an app to do it visually. Of course I have to do this "conventionally" with typing, in a language. But this convention is the victim of history, not the profit of evolution.
not to be critical, but this is pointless, it totally likes the power of actual programming, how are the functions used created? you would still have to program them manually correct? If one wants to program, learn programming, if not, don't. There is no need for this, in the end it's just another app, which is what he said he was trying to avoid in the beginning...
"In a functional language you not 'doing' anything". This is opposite of simplicity. Learn Object-Oriented programming - the real way to achieve simplicity. Functional programming - just way do do something simple very hard way. BTW - Linux pipes is as useful as wooden stove these days
Wow, I've always hoped something like this existed, now I know it was done all the way back in 2007. Also, the speaker's audio was higher quality than many zoom talks and this was 13 years ago, apparently they even had people in a video conference.
A very prescient comment at the end about string diagrams!
Awesome talk! Blew my mind
Bret Victor gave talks on the same theme.
I seriously like this guy
This is brilliant.
I think LightTable IDE implements these concepts very well :)
I think it might be hard to program without seeing the program anymore.
Brilliant!
Scope for imagining imaging.
Way semasiographic.
Art Scott -- Artist, Semasiographologist
I use LINEAR SYNTAX to program. I don't know what anything else would look like. Please, someone help me.
Now if only they can make youtube tangible and functional.
Being sold or not is not really important now is it? It either works for you or it doesn't. And in certain environments you just don't have a choice.
You didn't get it, man
Interesting, but I think you're not being critical enough. When I "learn programming" I use an app. An app called a "language." And I use typing (typing with a lower case 't.') to program. manually. When I create video game levels, or input forms, I create an app to do it visually. Of course I have to do this "conventionally" with typing, in a language. But this convention is the victim of history, not the profit of evolution.
Welcome to max/msp
not to be critical, but this is pointless, it totally likes the power of actual programming, how are the functions used created? you would still have to program them manually correct? If one wants to program, learn programming, if not, don't. There is no need for this, in the end it's just another app, which is what he said he was trying to avoid in the beginning...
"In a functional language you not 'doing' anything". This is opposite of simplicity. Learn Object-Oriented programming - the real way to achieve simplicity. Functional programming - just way do do something simple very hard way. BTW - Linux pipes is as useful as wooden stove these days
"VirtualAbstractFactoryBeanSingleton()"
yeah, simple...