Several methods of fabrication of the polygonal masonry using clay/gypsum replicas, a topography translator, and reduced clay models of the stone blocks along with a 3D-pantograph are described in the article “Fabrication methods of the polygonal masonry of large tightly-fitted stone blocks with curved surface interfaces in megalithic structures of Peru” (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0087.v7). RUclips does not allow a direct link. Search by the article title.
it's fantastic how much information you put together for this! there are minor readability issues, but it is very interesting overall. i do have some musings about it that i'll leave below. careful about the wording in your paper. occasionally, you propose your methodology as fact, eg. page 22 photo 14, you write "The Wall *is* built using the method combining elements of the methods of replica...", you should leave it as a hypothetical. it all seems very plausible, but the timeframe you give does not. you should take into account other evidence, because these sites are far older than 17th century european techniques. for example, look at ancient egypt and pumapunku. in egyptian stone walls they have the exact same type of stone faceting that is seen in peru, and we know those were built far before modern times, possibly 2000 years or older. and in pumapunku, they dated organic material in the the oldest layer of mound-filling to ~536-600 AD, meaning that is when the first settlers of that area began terracing their land. by your interpretation, they people there would have been living by some other means for a thousand years in that same location... perhaps it went the other way and these techniques ended up in europe several centuries later, or were reinvented then. i think these stone carving techniques came out of sumeria and made its way across the globe from there, you can see examples of similar stonework across the globe, and they know much of them to be older than a few hundred years. i think your paper could benefit from addressing that as well, because the eurocentrism doesnt track with what we see.
>... there are minor readability issues, ... Dear Fresh, would you like to let me know about these readability issues. Actually, I am very interested in improving the article's clarity. >careful about the wording in your paper. occasionally, you propose your methodology as fact, eg. page 22 photo 14, you write "The Wall is built using the method combining elements of the methods of replica...", you should leave it as a hypothetical. Thank you for your remark. I have inserted the word "probably" in the caption to Photo.14: "The Wall is probably built using the method combining elements of the methods of replica, clay model and 3D-pantograph". The corrected description will be presented later in the next (8th) version of the article. As an author I do not see similar faults always. Feel free to let me know about these and similar faults. >for example, look at ancient egypt and pumapunku. As far as I know, there is no polygonal masonry under consideration in the Pumapunku. >... look at ancient egypt and pumapunku. in egyptian stone walls they have the exact same type of stone faceting that is seen in peru I would say that the Peruvian polygonal masonry under consideration and the Ancient Egypt polygonal masonry have just some similar features. Note, that I wrote the word "Ancient" related to Ancient Egypt in the article using inverted commas. In my opinion, most of the Ancient Egypt artifacts are recent imitations (antiquities are sold well at any time + some other reasons). >i think these stone carving techniques came out of sumeria and made its way across the globe from there If possible, give me links to the examples of the Sumerian stone carving you are meaning on.
Brilliant! I have been looking for a plausible explanation of the protuberances & your explanation seems as plausible as any I have come across. Like most things in life... I believe the answer to these mystery's will turn out to be quite simple. I think the people that possessed this knowledge found it quite easy to pull off these building techniques with relatively small labor exerted.
This is a wonderful channel! It’s about time RUclips finally exposed me to it. Been watching Bright Insight, Ancient Architects and Uncharted X for awhile now and I love them too!
You sir are the closest to solving this then any other person online. The bias energy solution is super on the nose. I hope you find the professionals to expand on this.
🤯 amazing concept... it seems to me that it’s similar to the Hutchison Effect, coined by John Hutchison. However, that seems to be mostly demonstrated on metals, but not entirely. They levitate and soften while cold and even combine with other objects. I believe both effects are achieved through Quantum Potential Envelopes where resonance plays a huge role of aligning all the random molecular motions in a coherent way.
Wow, Finally someone that shares the same idea. Although I lean completely towards sonic vibration. Glyphs ,pics, etc of the Annunaki show them with some interesting tools that in my opinion match some of the scoop and chisel lines seen in some of the stones.... True that if you can disrupt the travel of the valence electrons it could destabilize the atom and possibly cause it to move between states of positive and negative ions which might cause it to become malleable and weightless. I can see the tangs being areas that can be grabbed or held onto to position the stones in place. The notches in some of them seem to be where maybe planks were placed to hold it up while it became stable again. There may have been some time while they adjusted the stone for the next fitting. I believe the closest to this process may be the Hutchinson effect.... I believe that's where to start.
If you can soften granite and mold it, why not just make a solid granite wall while soft without joints, just pour it using forms like a house foundation, or the hoover dam?
I have studied this and connected subjects for years, lately some very interesting theories have emerged , including geopolymerisation, casting stones as if concrete to floating them with air filled animal skin floatation bags into a partially flooded arena, and the use of cymatics sound to altyer and melt solid objects, even the use of volcanic mud and strong acids to chemically melt the surface and partially soften large stone bloacks, we are a lot nearer an understanding today than we have ever been
@@zora_noamflannery2548 studying Ed Leedskalnin would give you more clarity. In his experiments he uses steel fishing line and welding rods to show how magnetism works. However everyone has written it off as a childish explanation. However if you read between the lines of his writing you may realize he told us exactly how he moved the stone. (Ed Leedskalnin Coral Castles) If you upscale the experiment with crane size cable it will get the same results. A coil of copper wire wound around a iron tube just large enough to fit the cable thru it. Place the coil approximate half its length ( experiment with welding rod and spiders web/string) when energized sends the North and South pole magnets out the opposite ends of the cable creating a "magnetic lever" . Another tool he speaks of is called a PMH. This is an iron bar shaped in a "U" with a set of coils on each side of this "U" shaped bar. These two coils a copper wire wound around an aluminum pipe that can fit around the bar. Each of these coils a wound in opposite directions one "clockwise" the other "counterclockwise". When energized and a bar is placed between the opening of the "U" it will hold the bar in place with magnetism until forced off. Now when the coil of the magnetic lever is placed between the two coils of the PMH and wired properly the lever will hold the magnetism in the cable indefinitely until the bar is removed when once energized. If several of these tools were used together you can utilize the like force magnetism to levitate the load/Stone. If you was to bury two of the side by side a few feet apart with sand as an insulator (in experiment Ed used glass to show us) you can use other magnetic levers to lift and carry the stone along the pathway of those burried beneath the sand. Perhaps cloth or animal skins (aka leather) could be used in place of the sand to insulate the two from each other during transport. As far as how they obtain the electric/Magnicity they used? Earth battery technology along with something lile his generator to enhance the electric from them. It would only take 16 of these battery to equal 24-32v depending on material used along with the acidic value used. This is where his writing on plants come in. Another story within his riddles was he would work at night as to hide his works. If researchers would look in to the earth battery hard enough they may find that the bewitching hours may offer more energy from these earth battery. The magnetism flows over the earth at night time instead of hitting it head on as it does during the daytime. Perhaps an increase in Amphour of the battery would allow his generator to actually run itself after being started by simply a few cranks of a handle. Google or Yahoo search of the subject "Ed Leedskalnin writing" will take you to his writing. However I would also express that reading an actual copy of his writing (unmolested by someone else's opinion of his work) instead of something rewritten may help. Good luck on research. His secret is ALL there if you can read between the lines.
Humans, primitive to us, were a lot smarter than they are given credit. An example in just our recent history: Before the internet and powerful computers, some humans designed and built the SR-71, using brains and slide rulers. Now you would be hard pressed to find someone who could use a slide ruler. Going back in time we are finding examples of real things the "primitive" folks actually made. Calendars from stone, clocks from brass, impossible glass objects, and tools we don't even understand... And we "modern" humans are amazed. Did ancient people have a way to shape the massive rocks? Of course, we have the rocks. But being in the "box" of conventional training, we may never reinvent or believe how. Modern education teaches folks how to fit in the "box." But not necessarily how to think and imagine. It wouldn't surprise me if an uneducated kid in some less developed part of the world, showed up with a way to mold granite. And made statuettes to sell to tourists.
Even if they could mold stone, we'd still be left wondering how they got all that stone from its source to the final building site. The megalithic structures of the ancients are all around AMAZING!
@@bloodangels-sonsofsanguini7992 None of it is documented! LoL. That's why it's such a mystery. No records found of how it was ACTUALLY done. All we have are theories. And, those theories include slave labor. Because, for some reason, modern minds can only imagine it being done using the most unskilled type of work-force known to man.
@@arnonroyna4420 sorry lad, the Roman’s have fully documented how they moved millions of tonnes of granite, over thousands of kilometres. Over mountains, oceans etc.
Interesting idea about the possible origin of those nubs. I don't know if you're familiar with the Thunderbolts Project, but they have a few ideas that may sound radical when you first hear about them, but are all based on solid science, and may contain some of that missing information that is needed to understand how these structures were made. (although in my opinion, the most likely candidate would also seem to preclude any attempts to replicate them today) To summarize the basic idea, what if the Earth's gravity and density were less in the distant past, and the materials that make up these structures only became these massively heavy, hard, and dense objects that we know today, during the Younger Dryas period, at the end of the last ice age... which is when all the megafauna either disappeared due to extinction, or became the smaller versions of those same creatures, that are still around today. This concept of large animals shrinking in size would likely also apply to humans, and there is much evidence, both in the fossil record, (especially in North America) and in the legends of ancient cultures, for humans that were much larger than we currently are today. So if the people really were that much larger, and the rocky material they used for construction were lighter and less dense, then that could explain why they could achieve then, what we cannot achieve today... but it would also seem to imply that, unless the planet (and everything on or in it) were to somehow return to that previous state, we probably will not be reproducing them anytime soon. Perhaps in 2046 that could all change, but I won't speculate too much on that right now, because I would like to avoid sounding like a crazy man, but there are some very good reasons for thinking that it possibly could, and that would be the approximate time frame that these ideas seem to indicate as a likely probability. ruclips.net/user/ThunderboltsProjectvideos --> (which you may find interesting, even if you were to conclude that I'm just some kind of a nut) ruclips.net/user/ThunderboltsProjectplaylists Gravity Playlist: ruclips.net/p/PLwOAYhBuU3Uf4IJtxULr14MQ3_a4s_GoC (there is no short version on this) a brief summary would be... gravity is variable, and changes over time, and is proportional to the charge density in an object or region of space. distant past equals HUGE animals on Earth - over time they give way to the megafauna - then later replaced by things of todays scale - then... who knows? but many of the people already alive today, may get the opportunity to find out. ---------------- and then, there's this... ruclips.net/video/qzyDm_BegGA/видео.html (the short version + a longer more detailed version is also available) as it turns out, it doesn't always take millions of years for fossilization to occur, and with a very high voltage current present, can and does happen in just a couple of hours. (wood, to rock... in just a couple of hours)
I think your toughts have merits . Giants have been found and there skeletons seem to go missing. We dont have all the answers and its seems that some history has been kept from us or destroyed. Alien and ufo seem to be real. At least we see there ships. What physics would a advanced race know.? Dont we know enough to live in peace and harmony?
@@johnramirez5032 We've had enough knowledge to live in peace and harmony for a long time... what it seems we lack is the desire to do so. There are too many people who have felt weak for far too long, and when such people get a hold of any ;ittle bit of power at all, they almost always choose to abuse it, by extracting benefits for themselves, and exercising control over others when they can... (leaving those people with a sense of powerlessness) which then perpetuates this cycle. It's not a new problem, and it's not likely to go away any time soon.
@@Severe_CDO_Sufferer great observation. People seem to want to give away their power and exspect the wizard in charge to preform miracles. I wonder where that comes from ? Do people not know its complicated ? Its my team against your team. Seem ludicrous to me. I think if people were to agree on a specific direction then we could have less of that. I think the world could use a conscious upgrade. Fighting war is not the answer. Mabe we are not aware that we all create the world we live in. Think good thoughts and act on them. The power is in the people. It always has been . That power is people working together. Seems simple but everyone points their finger at everyone else.
I’m not sure I understand what is being said here. The theory discussed is used to describe the bonds of molecules, not the state of atoms. So are you saying by exciting an electron or changing it’s spin you would break these bonds? In that case you wouldn’t soften the stone, but have a bunch of I bonded atoms which would cease to be granite. I’m not sure the science checks out, but I’d like to hear more explanations
I hate to be reaching (not really)...so maybe aliens did build this or maybe it was ourselves from the future, or maybe ourselves from the past and we moderns are just ignorant.
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 Good, let's hear that clearer explanation as it should be fun to watch you flounder around like a fish out of water as you attempt to make what you are saying here have any resemblance to reality. Let's start with wtf neutralization has to do with gravity for starters.... GO!....
This is exactly how Glass Works except for the temperature is obviously very high when you soften it but it is exactly you can shape it that way and you even have nubs if you don't clean them off exactly like the rocks.
Thankyou. And we should study the authentic cone-head people, because where there are megalithic stone structures there are cone-head skulls. They had 25% greater brain capacity and very different skull features, perhaps their soft tissue was also different and they could produce a ‘sound’ which we no longer have the ability to do. I wonder why Neanderthals and Denisovans are being studied while Paracas and Crimean skulls are being ignored???
Dude, how is it that you have so little subs? Your theory is really good, and could truly go somewhere. I've seen how many down votes other vids of yours got, but please don't be discouraged, people is really stupid, they are subconsciously scared of the subject as it could easily rewrite not only history, but our understanding of human origins, which is why it is so frowned upon by institutions. I've been researching this topic since I was 13, I'm 42 now, and passion for it hasn't gone anywhere, I'm still excited when I read or hear something new, and this sure as hell applies. Are you familiar with the Electric Universe theory? I'm sure you'll find a lot of helping clues there, as it's the future of science. Thanks for the great work so far, please keep at it 🖤👍🏻
Thank You Nick! Yes, the Trolls can be a bummer,, but they also indicate that I’m striking a chord! I will keep up the videowork! I wish I could get Brien Foerster or Matt from Uncharted X to share my video!
Exactly...Happy to recommend someone/channel of someonejust who has done several "hands on" videos showing the incredible talents and feats achieved by a mere mortals hands. The channel is (Sacred Geometry Decoded) and is the premiere destination for those looking to regain the power and mastery of talents their ancestors and anyone who helped possesed.
Amazing theory, this explains the nubs much better then some sort of lifting point. Absolutely the best explanation I've found so far. Can you point me to more info? Do you think this is possible today? I've been following all the channels you recommended at the end of the video for a few years. Surprised I have heard your theory before.
Thank You! and Sorry for this late reply. It's been a busy year and I should have responded sooner! Did I really produce this video a year ago?! Wow. Yes,, we are missing something huge here. It's like with foil boards. Can you imagine Surfing for decades,, being like a hugely famous surfer and spending your entire life surfing ON the wave,, and then seeing the FOIL surfing that is happening now! Yah,, I'd be like,, "I wasted my entire surfing life by actually being ON the water,, not knowing that I could be above the water,,,.. Thank You for Watching. I'll have more videos soon.
@@FenixDown147 Calling this a theory would require that it has been tested. Barring that the best that can be said is that this is a hypothesis which is a possible explanation for phenomena that is currently a mystery. This video also no explanation for how this neutralizing force could be created. Considering that nothing like this is proposed even by the best scientists, to my knowledge it may remain another wild guess, but who knows what the future holds??
I don't really understand what you're saying , but for someone with little to no knowledge of math and science I can now somewhat see how people say large stones were shaped so beautifully and moved into the sky by softening the stone. What I'm trying to say is thank-you. PS, I live for cyclopean and polygonal masonry.
Interesting thoughts. Definitely lost ancient advanced technology. Even some of the “concrete “ theories out there have their difficulties. Keep up the good work!
Mass does effect time. The larger the mass, the more gravity it creates, therefore mass effects time through gravitational time dilation. It’s real and it’s repeatable in experiments. Gravitational Time Dilation.
I've always known some how that frequency had a role to play. This theory makes alot of sence. Nikola Tesla said if you want to understand the universe think in terms of energy frequency and vibration. Tesla was one of our untapped resources. If only money was never a factor and greed sank into the ocean. Maybe one day THEY will tell us the truth about the world we live in, until then keep your eyes open.
You're never too old for learning something new, I'm 51 and learning new things all the time. I've recently learnt about geopolymers, and accounts of how the Chinese builders mixed their cement. On some of the older sections of the great Wall. I've seen industry videos highlighting it as an alkaline activated geopolymer. The modern recipe includes 2 chemical parts, 2 different grades of aggregates and fly ash (really fine ash}. Scientists discovered that one ancient ingredient, contained a protein that forms chains of molecules. This process is accelerated when it comes into contact with an alkali. I don't know the ratio of the ingredients, it was something that wasn't covered. The 2 old ingredients were pigs blood and urine, pigs blood contains the protein and (providing that no caffeine or other stimulants are consumed) urine is alkaline. I think that the construction industry would like to make lots of money from this quite simple technique, which is why I have just blurted the simple version out. 😁👍
There is so much going here. From the ultra-precise fitting of the stones to the flat polished surfaces and all the drill holes... I think 'They' used sound for the stones. The drills hole's we're made from machines. No other way around it. Also, there is so much more area that is still buried. With that, the mystery just gets deeper.
PV=nRT describes the behavior of a gas. Apologies if I sound ignorant and pardon my lack of understanding. What is a valance neutralization theory? I couldn’t understand from your video. A phase diagram is typically constructed and used to understand phase transition of materials and the ideal gas law is only applicable for the gaseous phase of matter. How does any of this explain changing the weight or hardness of stone? What am I missing? I really want to understand what you are saying and see if your theory makes sense. P.S. you kept pronouncing silicone for the element silicon, two different things… By neutralization, do you mean somehow pairing the valence electrons with additional electrons without covalent bonding?
As a geologist and an engineer I concluded that the contacts between these monolithic structures especially in Peru, are from soft depositions features, meaning that at the contact point the rocks were pliable. This explains my theory somewhat. Just how. Also look up Coral Castle as the recent Lithuanian said that he "knew how the pyramids were built"
I come from an entrepreneurial background. After watching a few of your videos it's quiet clear your ability to think out of the box is extraodinary. You really should approach an open minded person at MIT for example and lay out your hypothesis to see if you could get some traction. I've now subbed and hope you choose to do such a thing and publish here on YT. Your viewership should go up exponentially if you could get some community support from, for example Brien Forster, or Bright Insight and Uncharted X. Absolutely worth a go. Thank you for your contribution.
I am a Patreon to Ben(UnchartedX), but I don't think he's had any time to watch other people's videos lately! Thank You for your kind and encouraging words! I think my channel will grow soon. One of my videos is attracting a lot of trolls though,, Ugh.
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 trolls! Funny how many people with limited knowledge can judge others. Time and space is flexable. We have much to learn. Conspiracy theories based on little no know fact are killing the possibilities. What are the odds we are still alive aftervall these stupid war and asteroids and everything else.? I think pretty slim. I think we had help. We are a funny spesies. We know so little but think we have it all figured out
You could be on to something. I set a butter knife on a piece of granite and then played Slim Whitman’s greatest hits at full volume and when I was done, the knife had fallen off the rock.
So this guy is telling me that whoever built this walls had extensive knowledge of nuclear physics and chemistry? So, we are adknowledging here that the walls were not built by the Incas, or Egyptians or the primitive people of Baalbek, and so on? Glad you are coming to understand that there was a very advanced civilization roaming the planet long before the cataclysmic event of the younger dryas period.
@@al2207 I think the pink granite is cut and the grand gallery is a lifting ramp, the outer basalt was poured geopolimer perfectly fitting casing stone, and the sand stone is a mix of poured and cut rock. So they used all three technology's just like we do today.
Very good,I have learned alot ,thank you ,I'm still trying to get my head around how they transported some of those huge things for 100s of miles of bad terrain and rivers ,,its just crazy.
They made it because it was easy but hard. The block today has stone appearance isn’t formed naturally but artificial by a chemical process named geopolymer. Just because share same compositions and proportions don’t make them out of same origin. Major difference between modern and ancient concrete is by the binder cement. Modern cement need high heat to brew while geopolymer cement are naturally available and no further heat is required once mined. The principle is the same. Some of those we call natural may also follow a natural process with no human involved. Sand crystals of a specific ingredient and proportion often rain down deposits follow by acid or alkaline rain, soon we have solid natural stone. Ancient men have study the process and learn how to reproduce those stone only this time they play with it before it sets hard into what we call “natural” stone. They also know a time windows in which they can shape it before it became too hard on their ancient tool, alternatively to “flow mold” the liquid material into polygonal blocks, other times to shape it into a statue with bamboo sticks.
As an actual real life stone Mason " like a real one, not the secret club" I work on restorations of extremely old churches., and build new buildings. To say we can't build what was built before is just stupid. Even without electromagnetic harmonics... pulleys, block and tackles, leverage In itself could have got it done. There's still shadow boxes in the churches I've worked in showing black and white photos of just that. 3 ton blocks of granite being set in place with block and tackle in the early 1800's
I think you should also consider the the fact that many of the ancient megalithic sites were places where the materials couldn't be found for sometimes up to hundreds of miles away like Stonehenge and the Great Pyramids. To move vast amounts of extremely large materials like that over such distances, and especially in a realistic time frame, is an absolute phenomenon in and of itself. Belief was all they had back then, so it certainly could have been possible, but very hard to wrap your head around. Imagine a large amount men working together to move rocks the size of dump trucks for hundreds of miles. Even with slaves, the effort just to feed everybody along the journey seems unreasonable. I imagine it would take months, if not years, just to move a single stone considering terrains and what technology we currently believe they might have had then.
Where are the tools? Where is the language, the written blueprints? These things are required to carry out such constructions. It hints at extreme antiquity. It suggests cycles of civilization rather than linear progression or even evolution. You can’t build the great pyramid. You couldn’t even comprehend it.
@@loosepockettobacco you realise that the Roman’s moved granite columns 1,000’s of kilometres. It was common’s practice, honestly it was a thriving business transporting large stones . That being said, I can’t work out how these stones are laid
Wow, really detailed theory but pretty manageable. Like it. Actually quite mind blowing, how deep into chemistry it went, could well be the key. Have watched a fair few videos on the pyramids of giza , Egypt and the megalithic structures of the world.Keep up the research.
The problem with the softening theory in my view is that the back side of the stones contains chinking and doesn't match up as perfectly as the front. If the stones were softened they would likely match perfectly on all sides.
@@GroberWeisenstein That's where the strength lies. In its symmetry. The chinking most likely came from a heat source. Even with the known variables and math. The question still arises. How did they do it. Even if they knew the math, how would they have done this? They had help.
Take a piece of granite from the bedrock, near such a building site at the quarry, analyze it completely, including it's crystalline structure and compounds that it's made up of. Then cut the rounded face of a block that has been used to build such a wall nearby. Do the same analysis. See if there is a chance and if so, what. This might offer yet another clue. Or even proof for certain techniques being used.
I have always felt that they were simply hot when laid. The nubs are where the heating electrodes were pulled out once they were set. It looks obvious to me.
Thank you Harvey, I’m very impressed with your theories on stone softening and levitation! I personally believe that the ancients had great knowledge of a more natural and sustainable high technology. I hope we can start experimenting with some of your ideas and opening doors that have been hidden, perhaps even suppressed over time. Thank you for your hard work,research and production, I’m going to watch all of your videos today! 🐄
Excellent! Thank You for your purchase and for letting me know! Please leave a review for the book too! I'm going to go and check out your channel now,, Thanks Again! -H
I have a question. It seems that the reason to set down malleable stones, is to fit them into lower stones that have unusual shapes. I get that. But why are the lower stones molded into jagged and/or unusually shaped stones to begin with? Isn't it ideal to be able to lay a flat stone upon a flat surface and create a more simple and homogenous series of stones, instead of each stone being a unique shape?
I don't know if you know this, but there was a geological survey, due to the site being at risk of collapse, at Ollantaytambo and the conclusion was that the largest rocks, at their core, are formed by fragments of other smaller rocks covered with a geopolimer made from the rocks from the quary where it is said the rocks were harvested from, and the smaller blocks were only this geopolimer. As to the pyramids and the sandstone, a french quemist alredy demontrated that with products available to the Egypcians, they could solve the sandstone, take it in buckets and pour it in a mould that, once dried, was indestinguishable from the original rock, mantaining the same composition. This would explain the fact that no razor blade can be put through the stone joins. they just move the mold, pour in the next block in the desired shape, and let it dry. The time to build a structure would eventually be the same as needed to move the material. But then there are locations when nulifying the state of matter make sence, like the making of khailash temple or moving the stones at baalbek. Sorry for any grammar mistakes, as English is not my first language :)
The Egyptians had colonies in Utah long ago. They came for gold and silver. They learned how to soften stone from the local natives. The chamisa plant when burned can be a source to extract salts from the soil. These salts would soften clay pots so the women always used wooden ones. When Egyptian engineers saw the softening effect they studied it further to determine the process and applied it to building methods.
Please stop calling it a theorem. You mean theory. Moreover, it is not a theory. It is at best a hypothesis, and not a good one because it provides zero ideas about how to test it. It also relies on things we already know to be wrong. Even if you mess with valence electrons, the mass of any atom is mostly in the nucleus, so your not going to turn granite into something light by messing with its components’ valence electrons. That’s just one issue, but that’s all it takes.
The " what IF there were another variable" is only a hopeful hypothesis & not testable yet by scientific means. Speaking of cornerstones, the cornerstone of science is that you have a series of testable hypotheses which help to prove a " theory" AND that's not all, your work has to be repeatable by others using your methods...I learned these things early in my public high school years & THOSE approaches to fact finding have not been superceded yet by fake science, mystics, gurus, shamans, or conspiracy theorists. I'm waiting...
There are plenty of stone softening theories on RUclips to explain how such large blocks of stone fit together so closely. I would think that in this day and age, that someone, somewhere, would have tested these theories to see if any might be proven.
So basically it was done by magic ? Okay that's cool dude, thanks for explaining this. 😅😂🤣 Of course if we suspend the laws of physics we can do some incredible things.
@@brindlebriar No we believe them because they have been proven. The creator of this video just talks out of his lying ass and spreads stupidity to the masses.
@@seditt5146 I have likewise been told that the laws of physics have been proven. But since they have not been proven to me personally, it would be unscientific for me to believe that, as to do so would constitute having blind faith in proclamations of other men. It would be to relate to scientists as if they were a clergy. I'm sure they would not want that.
@@brindlebriar all physics as we understand them inside this are the way they are. When you take the same ingredients and exspose the to different pressures ,vacuums electrical and somic waves in a weightless in enviourment you get different results. We are performing weightless exspiraments in space for a while . Perhaps there are answers there? We are learning new things daily i would think. Application is a different beast. I think honest scientists will tell you we have a lot to learn.
@Ra Akhanaten Everything must be explained to me personally in order for me to know it. If you have some magical thinking that allows you to know things by some other means, I was not endowed with such magic, sadly. Thus, I must employ the scientific approach, which is that one can know only what his been demonstrated to him to the satisfaction of all his doubts and critiques. If you are able to know that something is true merely be someone having told you it is true, you are very lucky in that. But I must say I wonder about the reliability of that method.
Dear Harvey, your theory looks impressive, what would you consider to be required in terms of scientific support and resources in order to test its feasibility? Further, does the term Phonon say anything to you? It is defined as a collective excitation in a periodic, elastic arrangement of atoms or molecules in condensed matter, specifically in solids and some liquids. Recent research has shown that phonons and rotons may have a non-negligible mass and be affected by gravity just as standard particles are. From this, it is predicted that phonons would deflect away as it detects the difference in densities, exhibiting the qualities of a negative gravitational field. Although the effect would be too small to measure, it is possible that future equipment could lead to successful results. In 2019, researchers were able to isolate individual phonons without destroying them for the first time. (Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon?oldformat=true )
I'd like to be completely open minded and I have no prejudice. You have a theory and that is great. Call me a doubting Thomas or what ever but I need to see this demonstrated on this grand scale using the same tools that were available at the time. Melting pebbles in a Petri dish isn't going to cut it. The way I see it right now, either these people had advanced technologies we did not suspect or they had outside help. I would love to see proof that a people of ancient times had the ability to do things we can not do today.
Excellent video. Solid explanations backed by Evidence and pictures, not just THEORY. A+ dude! I have seen this technology done to stone. Cut it like soft room temperature butter and put in place by a weightless arm & aligned to perfection. How?
Almost sounds like if you countered the spin and strong force present in valence electrons turning them into neutrons/creating a net 0 electronic force then the material would act like a solid fluid. Similar to how superfluid helium exists with a homogenous molecular potential across the matter, if there was a net 0 valence spin then I imagine the material would be static but would also completely ducile to the touch. Now I think such a material would act like a kinetic conductor, where the valence forces applied to the stone afterwards would be the influencing factor for its state of matter. If that were the case I bet you could take a chisel and with a precise tap cleave a stone in 2 simply because the kinetic force will activate those neutralized valence shells from one to another as the shells are reneutralized and the kinetic force travels from particle to particle. So the question is how do you neutralize the valence electron spin in a highly resistive material without lowering the temperature or pressure? Maybe if you could like inversely resonate just one valence electron after enough time you would eventually neutralize the material so long as the valence shells are interacting, though it's ultimatly a supertask to incrementally neutralize spin like that: you could keep neutralizing valence potential with frequency but will never reach an end point of 0.
Try prolonged powerful low frequency sound waves. After that, try powerful high frequency radio waves. After that, try both at the same time. After that, try harmonics, the possibilities are almost endless.
It can’t. 99.95% of an atom’s mass is in its nucleus, and messing with the electrons won’t change that. It CAN let you use electrostatic forces to oppose gravity (like how static lets your hair stand on end), but IF you could get a stone block to hover a mm above another block similarly chargesdwith extra electrons, God help anyone near it when it all discharges.
Well done. Would this be scalable enough to deal with an oncoming outer space object? Some of us are already practicing telekinesis for that very reason.
People with the level of technology you are advocating, a technology beyond where we are today, would be doing other things with it and all the other technology that goes along with it just like we are.
@Todd Hendrix I do not see anything that regular people could not do with the great pyramid. The hardest job would be cutting the pink granite for the king's chamber. If you have the time regular ppl can cut it.
Plants can eat through stone. Soaking the rocks in water with some type of plants are one way this was done. I have seen interviews of tribes people explaining this.
Dude, I searched "how was megalithic structures built" and you came up. Keep it up man. Clearly, the ancients used some technique not known to us and clearly they used a tool that we are not aware of - clearly. Don't stop. We are all still watching, even in 2021. Conventional thinking will get us nowhere. Remember, Jimmy started out just like you. Today's travelling with Brien.
I got an email from Ben yesterday. He's in Cusco with Brien filming some new stuff. Jimmy's there too? God I'd love to listen in on that fun! I'll just have to wait for the video!
What about (dare i say it) the Geopolymer theory?? It gets frowned upon but that is the likeliest theory for me. Also explains why some granite blocks are degrading "inside out" and how some rocks look like they have melted. The nubs are the red herring though... How were these produced/left using the geopolymer theory if the blocks were "poured" in place? Fascinating stuff.
Great video.. I agree.. There must have been some kind of technology that is unknown to modern man.. I also think they used natural stuff such as ice,, for friction, movement and precision. Ice is extremely powerful when it expands and can easily withstand hundreds of tons if the ice sheet is on solid ground even if the ice sheet is a few millimeter thick,,, Ice causes friction with granite and you can place heavy objects with precision.. And if some of the megalithic monuments are older than 15000 years then im sure they used ice as a tool/method, but unfortunately when ice is mentioned it is not even being considered because of the timeline to the old kingdom and such,, But,, if they knew how to create ice or if they had the temperature for water to become ice, then moving 100-ton blocks in serapeum would be much easier than any other method because of the friction. Of course i'm not claiming anything, it is just a thought. Thanx for the video, i found it very interesting. Cheers.
It seems to me that we need to study the mating surfaces of two adjacent rocks. If rock softening was done you would expect to be able to deduce the sequence as there should always be a bulging unbound surface which is later mated to a new block.
The one key component that ancient people utilized to achieve such exactness that no modern man can definitely understand this concept due to these Struthers already existing is. Simply. Time. Science and historians theorize, surmise and hypothesize the advent of these structures but even with that, people can't grasp the actual concept of how long it took native people(s) to build such a structure. It didn't take advanced level math and computations it was just feel like a master machinist holding precision measurements in microns as oppose to a greenhorn machinist going into the trade. The time it takes the greenhorn to develope the "feel" of a master machinist may have been the equivalent for ancient people to do the same in the most simplist ways as to be unacceptable by the best scientific minds. So, is it any wonder, these may be one of the wonders of the world?
damn this sounds legit. great explanation of the nubs. many ancient myths revolving around sound and its power i think they already know a lot they arent telling us. great presentation
Such a good channel. I wish RUclips recommended it to me sooner!
Several methods of fabrication of the polygonal masonry using clay/gypsum replicas, a topography translator, and reduced clay models of the stone blocks along with a 3D-pantograph are described in the article “Fabrication methods of the polygonal masonry of large tightly-fitted stone blocks with curved surface interfaces in megalithic structures of Peru” (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0087.v7). RUclips does not allow a direct link. Search by the article title.
it's fantastic how much information you put together for this! there are minor readability issues, but it is very interesting overall. i do have some musings about it that i'll leave below.
careful about the wording in your paper. occasionally, you propose your methodology as fact, eg. page 22 photo 14, you write "The Wall *is* built using the method combining elements of the methods of replica...", you should leave it as a hypothetical.
it all seems very plausible, but the timeframe you give does not. you should take into account other evidence, because these sites are far older than 17th century european techniques. for example, look at ancient egypt and pumapunku. in egyptian stone walls they have the exact same type of stone faceting that is seen in peru, and we know those were built far before modern times, possibly 2000 years or older. and in pumapunku, they dated organic material in the the oldest layer of mound-filling to ~536-600 AD, meaning that is when the first settlers of that area began terracing their land. by your interpretation, they people there would have been living by some other means for a thousand years in that same location... perhaps it went the other way and these techniques ended up in europe several centuries later, or were reinvented then.
i think these stone carving techniques came out of sumeria and made its way across the globe from there, you can see examples of similar stonework across the globe, and they know much of them to be older than a few hundred years. i think your paper could benefit from addressing that as well, because the eurocentrism doesnt track with what we see.
>... there are minor readability issues, ...
Dear Fresh, would you like to let me know about these readability issues. Actually, I am very interested in improving
the article's clarity.
>careful about the wording in your paper. occasionally, you propose your methodology as fact, eg. page 22 photo 14,
you write "The Wall is built using the method combining elements of the methods of replica...", you should leave it as
a hypothetical.
Thank you for your remark. I have inserted the word "probably" in the caption to Photo.14: "The Wall is probably built
using the method combining elements of the methods of replica, clay model and 3D-pantograph". The corrected
description will be presented later in the next (8th) version of the article. As an author I do not see similar faults
always. Feel free to let me know about these and similar faults.
>for example, look at ancient egypt and pumapunku.
As far as I know, there is no polygonal masonry under consideration in the Pumapunku.
>... look at ancient egypt and pumapunku. in egyptian stone walls they have the exact same type of stone faceting
that is seen in peru
I would say that the Peruvian polygonal masonry under consideration and the Ancient Egypt polygonal masonry have
just some similar features. Note, that I wrote the word "Ancient" related to Ancient Egypt in the article using inverted
commas. In my opinion, most of the Ancient Egypt artifacts are recent imitations (antiquities are sold well at any
time + some other reasons).
>i think these stone carving techniques came out of sumeria and made its way across the globe from there
If possible, give me links to the examples of the Sumerian stone carving you are meaning on.
The 8th article edition (DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0087.v8) is posted at Preprints. Search the article by DOI or by title.
Brilliant! I have been looking for a plausible explanation of the protuberances & your explanation seems as plausible as any I have come across. Like most things in life... I believe the answer to these mystery's will turn out to be quite simple. I think the people that possessed this knowledge found it quite easy to pull off these building techniques with relatively small labor exerted.
This is a wonderful channel! It’s about time RUclips finally exposed me to it. Been watching Bright Insight, Ancient Architects and Uncharted X for awhile now and I love them too!
Yes,, and I'm an Uncharted X Patreon. He is willing to put forth his theories. He goes the extra mile with his research!
You sir are the closest to solving this then any other person online. The bias energy solution is super on the nose. I hope you find the professionals to expand on this.
Pretty darned thrilling compelling theoretical plausibilities and thankyou for them !
🤯 amazing concept...
it seems to me that it’s similar to the Hutchison Effect, coined by John Hutchison.
However, that seems to be mostly demonstrated on metals, but not entirely. They levitate and soften while cold and even combine with other objects.
I believe both effects are achieved through Quantum Potential Envelopes where resonance plays a huge role of aligning all the random molecular motions in a coherent way.
Wow, Finally someone that shares the same idea. Although I lean completely towards sonic vibration. Glyphs ,pics, etc of the Annunaki show them with some interesting tools that in my opinion match some of the scoop and chisel lines seen in some of the stones.... True that if you can disrupt the travel of the valence electrons it could destabilize the atom and possibly cause it to move between states of positive and negative ions which might cause it to become malleable and weightless. I can see the tangs being areas that can be grabbed or held onto to position the stones in place. The notches in some of them seem to be where maybe planks were placed to hold it up while it became stable again. There may have been some time while they adjusted the stone for the next fitting. I believe the closest to this process may be the Hutchinson effect.... I believe that's where to start.
Holy shit, I just spent 4 hours trying to find your channel again. Found you.
Sorry,, I changed my channel name! I won't do that again,, I promise.
Keeping the "mystery" alive keeps the tourists dollars flowing in.
If you can soften granite and mold it, why not just make a solid granite wall while soft without joints, just pour it using forms like a house foundation, or the hoover dam?
@@GroberWeisenstein why make such huge unwieldy blocks, rather than bricks or 12 in. Blocks?
Your mind is within resonance of the ancient ones. You are worthy of the mystery school teachings brother. Hinc Sapientia
I have studied this and connected subjects for years, lately some very interesting theories have emerged , including geopolymerisation, casting stones as if concrete to floating them with air filled animal skin floatation bags into a partially flooded arena, and the use of cymatics sound to altyer and melt solid objects, even the use of volcanic mud and strong acids to chemically melt the surface and partially soften large stone bloacks, we are a lot nearer an understanding today than we have ever been
- Melting stones in situ is one thing, transporting them over many miles of unforgiving territory has yet to be addressed.
@@zora_noamflannery2548 studying Ed Leedskalnin would give you more clarity. In his experiments he uses steel fishing line and welding rods to show how magnetism works. However everyone has written it off as a childish explanation. However if you read between the lines of his writing you may realize he told us exactly how he moved the stone. (Ed Leedskalnin Coral Castles) If you upscale the experiment with crane size cable it will get the same results. A coil of copper wire wound around a iron tube just large enough to fit the cable thru it. Place the coil approximate half its length ( experiment with welding rod and spiders web/string) when energized sends the North and South pole magnets out the opposite ends of the cable creating a "magnetic lever" . Another tool he speaks of is called a PMH. This is an iron bar shaped in a "U" with a set of coils on each side of this "U" shaped bar. These two coils a copper wire wound around an aluminum pipe that can fit around the bar. Each of these coils a wound in opposite directions one "clockwise" the other "counterclockwise". When energized and a bar is placed between the opening of the "U" it will hold the bar in place with magnetism until forced off. Now when the coil of the magnetic lever is placed between the two coils of the PMH and wired properly the lever will hold the magnetism in the cable indefinitely until the bar is removed when once energized. If several of these tools were used together you can utilize the like force magnetism to levitate the load/Stone. If you was to bury two of the side by side a few feet apart with sand as an insulator (in experiment Ed used glass to show us) you can use other magnetic levers to lift and carry the stone along the pathway of those burried beneath the sand. Perhaps cloth or animal skins (aka leather) could be used in place of the sand to insulate the two from each other during transport. As far as how they obtain the electric/Magnicity they used? Earth battery technology along with something lile his generator to enhance the electric from them. It would only take 16 of these battery to equal 24-32v depending on material used along with the acidic value used. This is where his writing on plants come in. Another story within his riddles was he would work at night as to hide his works. If researchers would look in to the earth battery hard enough they may find that the bewitching hours may offer more energy from these earth battery. The magnetism flows over the earth at night time instead of hitting it head on as it does during the daytime. Perhaps an increase in Amphour of the battery would allow his generator to actually run itself after being started by simply a few cranks of a handle. Google or Yahoo search of the subject "Ed Leedskalnin writing" will take you to his writing. However I would also express that reading an actual copy of his writing (unmolested by someone else's opinion of his work) instead of something rewritten may help. Good luck on research. His secret is ALL there if you can read between the lines.
@@zora_noamflannery2548 the Roman’s transported huge columns all over the known world, this is well documented .
Humans, primitive to us, were a lot smarter than they are given credit. An example in just our recent history: Before the internet and powerful computers, some humans designed and built the SR-71, using brains and slide rulers. Now you would be hard pressed to find someone who could use a slide ruler.
Going back in time we are finding examples of real things the "primitive" folks actually made. Calendars from stone, clocks from brass, impossible glass objects, and tools we don't even understand... And we "modern" humans are amazed.
Did ancient people have a way to shape the massive rocks? Of course, we have the rocks. But being in the "box" of conventional training, we may never reinvent or believe how. Modern education teaches folks how to fit in the "box." But not necessarily how to think and imagine.
It wouldn't surprise me if an uneducated kid in some less developed part of the world, showed up with a way to mold granite. And made statuettes to sell to tourists.
Even if they could mold stone, we'd still be left wondering how they got all that stone from its source to the final building site.
The megalithic structures of the ancients are all around AMAZING!
@@arnonroyna4420 it’s fully documented on how the rocks were moved. That’s not secret and or wonder .
@@bloodangels-sonsofsanguini7992 None of it is documented! LoL. That's why it's such a mystery.
No records found of how it was ACTUALLY done. All we have are theories. And, those theories include slave labor. Because, for some reason, modern minds can only imagine it being done using the most unskilled type of work-force known to man.
@@arnonroyna4420 sorry lad, the Roman’s have fully documented how they moved millions of tonnes of granite, over thousands of kilometres. Over mountains, oceans etc.
@@bloodangels-sonsofsanguini7992 The Roman's built the Pyramids in Egypt? 🤨
thank you for sharing this information
Interesting idea about the possible origin of those nubs.
I don't know if you're familiar with the Thunderbolts Project, but they have a few ideas that may sound radical when you first hear about them, but are all based on solid science, and may contain some of that missing information that is needed to understand how these structures were made. (although in my opinion, the most likely candidate would also seem to preclude any attempts to replicate them today)
To summarize the basic idea, what if the Earth's gravity and density were less in the distant past, and the materials that make up these structures only became these massively heavy, hard, and dense objects that we know today, during the Younger Dryas period, at the end of the last ice age... which is when all the megafauna either disappeared due to extinction, or became the smaller versions of those same creatures, that are still around today.
This concept of large animals shrinking in size would likely also apply to humans, and there is much evidence, both in the fossil record, (especially in North America) and in the legends of ancient cultures, for humans that were much larger than we currently are today.
So if the people really were that much larger, and the rocky material they used for construction were lighter and less dense, then that could explain why they could achieve then, what we cannot achieve today... but it would also seem to imply that, unless the planet (and everything on or in it) were to somehow return to that previous state, we probably will not be reproducing them anytime soon.
Perhaps in 2046 that could all change, but I won't speculate too much on that right now, because I would like to avoid sounding like a crazy man, but there are some very good reasons for thinking that it possibly could, and that would be the approximate time frame that these ideas seem to indicate as a likely probability.
ruclips.net/user/ThunderboltsProjectvideos --> (which you may find interesting, even if you were to conclude that I'm just some kind of a nut)
ruclips.net/user/ThunderboltsProjectplaylists
Gravity Playlist: ruclips.net/p/PLwOAYhBuU3Uf4IJtxULr14MQ3_a4s_GoC (there is no short version on this)
a brief summary would be... gravity is variable, and changes over time, and is proportional to the charge density in an object or region of space.
distant past equals HUGE animals on Earth - over time they give way to the megafauna - then later replaced by things of todays scale - then... who knows?
but many of the people already alive today, may get the opportunity to find out.
----------------
and then, there's this... ruclips.net/video/qzyDm_BegGA/видео.html (the short version + a longer more detailed version is also available)
as it turns out, it doesn't always take millions of years for fossilization to occur, and with a very high voltage current present, can and does happen in just a couple of hours.
(wood, to rock... in just a couple of hours)
I think your toughts have merits . Giants have been found and there skeletons seem to go missing. We dont have all the answers and its seems that some history has been kept from us or destroyed. Alien and ufo seem to be real. At least we see there ships. What physics would a advanced race know.? Dont we know enough to live in peace and harmony?
@@johnramirez5032 We've had enough knowledge to live in peace and harmony for a long time... what it seems we lack is the desire to do so.
There are too many people who have felt weak for far too long, and when such people get a hold of any ;ittle bit of power at all, they almost always choose to abuse it, by extracting benefits for themselves, and exercising control over others when they can... (leaving those people with a sense of powerlessness) which then perpetuates this cycle.
It's not a new problem, and it's not likely to go away any time soon.
@@Severe_CDO_Sufferer great observation. People seem to want to give away their power and exspect the wizard in charge to preform miracles. I wonder where that comes from ? Do people not know its complicated ? Its my team against your team. Seem ludicrous to me. I think if people were to agree on a specific direction then we could have less of that. I think the world could use a conscious upgrade. Fighting war is not the answer. Mabe we are not aware that we all create the world we live in. Think good thoughts and act on them. The power is in the people. It always has been . That power is people working together. Seems simple but everyone points their finger at everyone else.
@@johnramirez5032 Good Thoughts
Good Words
and Good Deeds
All the wars are fabricated, to make money (mono-eye) for the banksters.
I’m not sure I understand what is being said here. The theory discussed is used to describe the bonds of molecules, not the state of atoms. So are you saying by exciting an electron or changing it’s spin you would break these bonds? In that case you wouldn’t soften the stone, but have a bunch of I bonded atoms which would cease to be granite. I’m not sure the science checks out, but I’d like to hear more explanations
That's it. You nailed it.
Loved the explanation for the nubs. Makes perfect sense.
Thank You! I'll be doing a nubs video again next year. More illustrations! And a Clearer explanation.
I hate to be reaching (not really)...so maybe aliens did build this or maybe it was ourselves from the future, or maybe ourselves from the past and we moderns are just ignorant.
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 Good, let's hear that clearer explanation as it should be fun to watch you flounder around like a fish out of water as you attempt to make what you are saying here have any resemblance to reality. Let's start with wtf neutralization has to do with gravity for starters.... GO!....
Nice theory, when are you going to provide the proof and solution?
This is exactly how Glass Works except for the temperature is obviously very high when you soften it but it is exactly you can shape it that way and you even have nubs if you don't clean them off exactly like the rocks.
Thankyou. And we should study the authentic cone-head people, because where there are megalithic stone structures there are cone-head skulls. They had 25% greater brain capacity and very different skull features, perhaps their soft tissue was also different and they could produce a ‘sound’ which we no longer have the ability to do. I wonder why Neanderthals and Denisovans are being studied while Paracas and Crimean skulls are being ignored???
Re watch the movie Idiocracy to see how smaller brains won out in evolution.
I learned a lot! I had learned years ago that a special music key was used to short out gravity. And, it caused the stone to be as light as a feather!
Tuning forks
I wonder if this is how the wall of Jericho fell
Dude, how is it that you have so little subs? Your theory is really good, and could truly go somewhere. I've seen how many down votes other vids of yours got, but please don't be discouraged, people is really stupid, they are subconsciously scared of the subject as it could easily rewrite not only history, but our understanding of human origins, which is why it is so frowned upon by institutions. I've been researching this topic since I was 13, I'm 42 now, and passion for it hasn't gone anywhere, I'm still excited when I read or hear something new, and this sure as hell applies.
Are you familiar with the Electric Universe theory? I'm sure you'll find a lot of helping clues there, as it's the future of science. Thanks for the great work so far, please keep at it 🖤👍🏻
Thank You Nick! Yes, the Trolls can be a bummer,, but they also indicate that I’m striking a chord! I will keep up the videowork! I wish I could get Brien Foerster or Matt from Uncharted X to share my video!
Fascinating work! Frequency is everything.
Cool idea, can you show me actually softening granite and cutting it with a butter knife?
Tons of people talk about it but ZERO evidence
Exactly...Happy to recommend someone/channel of someonejust who has done several "hands on" videos showing the incredible talents and feats achieved by a mere mortals hands. The channel is (Sacred Geometry Decoded) and is the premiere destination for those looking to regain the power and mastery of talents their ancestors and anyone who helped possesed.
@@rfn74 that channel doesn't show evidence, just more guessing.
That's ok to guess, it's NOT OK TO MAKE CLAIMS WITHOUT EVIDENCE.
@@growthisfreedomunitedearth7584 urdumb
@@rfn74 good one....
@@growthisfreedomunitedearth7584 be well fren...
Amazing theory, this explains the nubs much better then some sort of lifting point. Absolutely the best explanation I've found so far. Can you point me to more info? Do you think this is possible today? I've been following all the channels you recommended at the end of the video for a few years. Surprised I have heard your theory before.
Thank You! and Sorry for this late reply. It's been a busy year and I should have responded sooner! Did I really produce this video a year ago?! Wow. Yes,, we are missing something huge here. It's like with foil boards. Can you imagine Surfing for decades,, being like a hugely famous surfer and spending your entire life surfing ON the wave,, and then seeing the FOIL surfing that is happening now! Yah,, I'd be like,, "I wasted my entire surfing life by actually being ON the water,, not knowing that I could be above the water,,,.. Thank You for Watching. I'll have more videos soon.
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 Awesome can't wait!
Polygonal walls constructed with geo-polymers using bags explains this without the woowoo!
ruclips.net/video/3CPMXeuSWq4/видео.html
@@FenixDown147 Calling this a theory would require that it has been tested. Barring that the best that can be said is that this is a hypothesis which is a possible explanation for phenomena that is currently a mystery.
This video also no explanation for how this neutralizing force could be created. Considering that nothing like this is proposed even by the best scientists, to my knowledge it may remain another wild guess, but who knows what the future holds??
I don't really understand what you're saying , but for someone with little to no knowledge of math and science I can now somewhat see how people say large stones were shaped so beautifully and moved into the sky by softening the stone. What I'm trying to say is thank-you. PS, I live for cyclopean and polygonal masonry.
Interesting thoughts. Definitely lost ancient advanced technology. Even some of the “concrete “ theories out there have their difficulties. Keep up the good work!
Civilisation started way sooner than it is depicted
WTF? What does the term "valence neutralization" refer to, and how does it cause weightlessness?
Nowhere is that in the math OR the science!
Was it not harmonics which brought down the walls of Jerico?
Brilliant deduction. you should have so many more subs!! I totally agree with the idea that the nubs were not removed before the rocks re-solidified..
Some are saying that gravity is a result of changes in time on a body (top vs bottom). So maybe we should be looking at how mass effects time.
Mass does effect time. The larger the mass, the more gravity it creates, therefore mass effects time through gravitational time dilation. It’s real and it’s repeatable in experiments. Gravitational Time Dilation.
@@jasontheflyingfarrierhays so is all we need is to get anti mass to reverse time gradients. Will anti matter cause things to float by effecting time?
I've always known some how that frequency had a role to play. This theory makes alot of sence. Nikola Tesla said if you want to understand the universe think in terms of energy frequency and vibration. Tesla was one of our untapped resources. If only money was never a factor and greed sank into the ocean. Maybe one day THEY will tell us the truth about the world we live in, until then keep your eyes open.
I like your thinking. Wish I was younger and had focused my time and mind on physics
I wish I was younger and had focused more of my time on hieroglyphics! I'm not smart enough for advanced physics,,
You're never too old for learning something new, I'm 51 and learning new things all the time. I've recently learnt about geopolymers, and accounts of how the Chinese builders mixed their cement. On some of the older sections of the great Wall.
I've seen industry videos highlighting it as an alkaline activated geopolymer.
The modern recipe includes 2 chemical parts, 2 different grades of aggregates and fly ash (really fine ash}.
Scientists discovered that one ancient ingredient, contained a protein that forms chains of molecules. This process is accelerated when it comes into contact with an alkali. I don't know the ratio of the ingredients, it was something that wasn't covered. The 2 old ingredients were pigs blood and urine, pigs blood contains the protein and (providing that no caffeine or other stimulants are consumed) urine is alkaline.
I think that the construction industry would like to make lots of money from this quite simple technique, which is why I have just blurted the simple version out. 😁👍
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 wish I was younger, I'd learn hieroglyphics and physics.
There is a Book in Russian about 100years Old that Explains how to soften Stone & how to Cast statues.
There is so much going here. From the ultra-precise fitting of the stones to the flat polished surfaces and all the drill holes... I think 'They' used sound for the stones. The drills hole's we're made from machines. No other way around it. Also, there is so much more area that is still buried. With that, the mystery just gets deeper.
PV=nRT describes the behavior of a gas. Apologies if I sound ignorant and pardon my lack of understanding. What is a valance neutralization theory? I couldn’t understand from your video. A phase diagram is typically constructed and used to understand phase transition of materials and the ideal gas law is only applicable for the gaseous phase of matter. How does any of this explain changing the weight or hardness of stone? What am I missing? I really want to understand what you are saying and see if your theory makes sense. P.S. you kept pronouncing silicone for the element silicon, two different things… By neutralization, do you mean somehow pairing the valence electrons with additional electrons without covalent bonding?
great job. nice work!
Thank You! -H
As a geologist and an engineer I concluded that the contacts between these monolithic structures especially in Peru, are from soft depositions features, meaning that at the contact point the rocks were pliable. This explains my theory somewhat. Just how.
Also look up Coral Castle as the recent Lithuanian said that he "knew how the pyramids were built"
Yes, it seems like it was softened.
I am working on actually reproducing that, however I am not like these goons that make claims without evidence.
I come from an entrepreneurial background. After watching a few of your videos it's quiet clear your ability to think out of the box is extraodinary.
You really should approach an open minded person at MIT for example and lay out your hypothesis to see if you could get some traction. I've now subbed and hope you choose to do such a thing and publish here on YT. Your viewership should go up exponentially if you could get some community support from, for example Brien Forster, or Bright Insight and Uncharted X.
Absolutely worth a go.
Thank you for your contribution.
I am a Patreon to Ben(UnchartedX), but I don't think he's had any time to watch other people's videos lately! Thank You for your kind and encouraging words! I think my channel will grow soon. One of my videos is attracting a lot of trolls though,, Ugh.
Polygonal walls constructed with geo-polymers using bags explains this without the woowoo!
ruclips.net/video/3CPMXeuSWq4/видео.html
@@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764 trolls! Funny how many people with limited knowledge can judge others. Time and space is flexable. We have much to learn. Conspiracy theories based on little no know fact are killing the possibilities. What are the odds we are still alive aftervall these stupid war and asteroids and everything else.? I think pretty slim. I think we had help. We are a funny spesies. We know so little but think we have it all figured out
You could be on to something. I set a butter knife on a piece of granite and then played Slim Whitman’s greatest hits at full volume and when I was done, the knife had fallen off the rock.
“History is a set of lies agreed upon”
-Napolean Bonaparte
Has anyone in modern day been able to successfully soften granite without ruining it?
It’s all about the sounds 🖖🏼
So this guy is telling me that whoever built this walls had extensive knowledge of nuclear physics and chemistry? So, we are adknowledging here that the walls were not built by the Incas, or Egyptians or the primitive people of Baalbek, and so on? Glad you are coming to understand that there was a very advanced civilization roaming the planet long before the cataclysmic event of the younger dryas period.
agree , made by aliens civilization some 20,000 years ago
Or it's primitive people using geopolimer.
@@DANTHETUBEMAN there is no geopolymer for any igneous rock like granite and andesite
@@al2207 I think the pink granite is cut and the grand gallery is a lifting ramp, the outer basalt was poured geopolimer perfectly fitting casing stone, and the sand stone is a mix of poured and cut rock. So they used all three technology's just like we do today.
@@DANTHETUBEMAN no, sand stone is made of sand solidified by time and mineralisation
Very good,I have learned alot ,thank you ,I'm still trying to get my head around how they transported some of those huge things for 100s of miles of bad terrain and rivers ,,its just crazy.
They made it because it was easy but hard.
The block today has stone appearance isn’t formed naturally but artificial by a chemical process named geopolymer. Just because share same compositions and proportions don’t make them out of same origin. Major difference between modern and ancient concrete is by the binder cement. Modern cement need high heat to brew while geopolymer cement are naturally available and no further heat is required once mined. The principle is the same.
Some of those we call natural may also follow a natural process with no human involved. Sand crystals of a specific ingredient and proportion often rain down deposits follow by acid or alkaline rain, soon we have solid natural stone.
Ancient men have study the process and learn how to reproduce those stone only this time they play with it before it sets hard into what we call “natural” stone. They also know a time windows in which they can shape it before it became too hard on their ancient tool, alternatively to “flow mold” the liquid material into polygonal blocks, other times to shape it into a statue with bamboo sticks.
As an actual real life stone Mason " like a real one, not the secret club" I work on restorations of extremely old churches., and build new buildings. To say we can't build what was built before is just stupid. Even without electromagnetic harmonics... pulleys, block and tackles, leverage In itself could have got it done. There's still shadow boxes in the churches I've worked in showing black and white photos of just that. 3 ton blocks of granite being set in place with block and tackle in the early 1800's
Yes but not melted like in peru. Its Eve different than the pyramids and older structures in Peru itself. Newer versus the most ancient.
I think you should also consider the the fact that many of the ancient megalithic sites were places where the materials couldn't be found for sometimes up to hundreds of miles away like Stonehenge and the Great Pyramids. To move vast amounts of extremely large materials like that over such distances, and especially in a realistic time frame, is an absolute phenomenon in and of itself. Belief was all they had back then, so it certainly could have been possible, but very hard to wrap your head around. Imagine a large amount men working together to move rocks the size of dump trucks for hundreds of miles. Even with slaves, the effort just to feed everybody along the journey seems unreasonable. I imagine it would take months, if not years, just to move a single stone considering terrains and what technology we currently believe they might have had then.
Where are the tools? Where is the language, the written blueprints? These things are required to carry out such constructions. It hints at extreme antiquity. It suggests cycles of civilization rather than linear progression or even evolution. You can’t build the great pyramid. You couldn’t even comprehend it.
There are two sites that I think all disbelievers need to see,, Baalbek and Ollantaytambo. Then there are a dozen more after that,,,,
@@loosepockettobacco you realise that the Roman’s moved granite columns 1,000’s of kilometres. It was common’s practice, honestly it was a thriving business transporting large stones . That being said, I can’t work out how these stones are laid
Wow, really detailed theory but pretty manageable. Like it. Actually quite mind blowing, how deep into chemistry it went, could well be the key. Have watched a fair few videos on the pyramids of giza , Egypt and the megalithic structures of the world.Keep up the research.
Thank You. Will do. It's a lot of unexplainable stuf tho-
Absolutely , every day is a school.
The problem with the softening theory in my view is that the back side of the stones contains chinking and doesn't match up as perfectly as the front. If the stones were softened they would likely match perfectly on all sides.
Actually no. More strength in the odd shapes they take on.
@@GroberWeisenstein
That's where the strength lies. In its symmetry. The chinking most likely came from a heat source. Even with the known variables and math. The question still arises. How did they do it. Even if they knew the math, how would they have done this? They had help.
@@GroberWeisenstein
They came out of the quarry already fitted, or are you saying the natives worked with the lava to form the shapes?
And the drill holes and saw marks?
@@GroberWeisenstein
You didn't answer the question?
Take a piece of granite from the bedrock, near such a building site at the quarry, analyze it completely, including it's crystalline structure and compounds that it's made up of. Then cut the rounded face of a block that has been used to build such a wall nearby. Do the same analysis.
See if there is a chance and if so, what. This might offer yet another clue. Or even proof for certain techniques being used.
I have always felt that they were simply hot when laid. The nubs are where the heating electrodes were pulled out once they were set. It looks obvious to me.
Thank you Harvey, I’m very impressed with your theories on stone softening and levitation! I personally believe that the ancients had great knowledge of a more natural and sustainable high technology. I hope we can start experimenting with some of your ideas and opening doors that have been hidden, perhaps even suppressed over time. Thank you for your hard work,research and production, I’m going to watch all of your videos today! 🐄
Your book came today from Amazon, thanks for sharing your thought, I really think you are on to something!b🐄🌞🌟🌓🐄
Excellent! Thank You for your purchase and for letting me know! Please leave a review for the book too! I'm going to go and check out your channel now,, Thanks Again! -H
I have a question. It seems that the reason to set down malleable stones, is to fit them into lower stones that have unusual shapes. I get that. But why are the lower stones molded into jagged and/or unusually shaped stones to begin with? Isn't it ideal to be able to lay a flat stone upon a flat surface and create a more simple and homogenous series of stones, instead of each stone being a unique shape?
So they don't slide.
@@gookumpucky4842 Oh please!
Claim after claim... where's the demonstration?
I don't know if you know this, but there was a geological survey, due to the site being at risk of collapse, at Ollantaytambo and the conclusion was that the largest rocks, at their core, are formed by fragments of other smaller rocks covered with a geopolimer made from the rocks from the quary where it is said the rocks were harvested from, and the smaller blocks were only this geopolimer. As to the pyramids and the sandstone, a french quemist alredy demontrated that with products available to the Egypcians, they could solve the sandstone, take it in buckets and pour it in a mould that, once dried, was indestinguishable from the original rock, mantaining the same composition. This would explain the fact that no razor blade can be put through the stone joins. they just move the mold, pour in the next block in the desired shape, and let it dry. The time to build a structure would eventually be the same as needed to move the material. But then there are locations when nulifying the state of matter make sence, like the making of khailash temple or moving the stones at baalbek.
Sorry for any grammar mistakes, as English is not my first language :)
The Egyptians had colonies in Utah long ago. They came for gold and silver. They learned how to soften stone from the local natives.
The chamisa plant when burned can be a source to extract salts from the soil. These salts would soften clay pots so the women always used wooden ones. When Egyptian engineers saw the softening effect they studied it further to determine the process and applied it to building methods.
And how do you know that? 😊
grabbing my didgeridoo and gonna go soften some stones.
Please stop calling it a theorem. You mean theory. Moreover, it is not a theory. It is at best a hypothesis, and not a good one because it provides zero ideas about how to test it. It also relies on things we already know to be wrong. Even if you mess with valence electrons, the mass of any atom is mostly in the nucleus, so your not going to turn granite into something light by messing with its components’ valence electrons. That’s just one issue, but that’s all it takes.
The 'binder' to geopolymer is nano powdered rock - processed via sonic wave.
Some cutting of rock, the waste processed into geopolymer.
The 6 th gear in your manual transmission (THE ANGEL GEAR) 🤔
Well Done !
If you can’t reproduce it, it’s just another theory.
The " what IF there were another variable" is only a hopeful hypothesis & not testable yet by scientific means. Speaking of cornerstones, the cornerstone of science is that you have a series of testable hypotheses which help to prove a " theory" AND that's not all, your work has to be repeatable by others using your methods...I learned these things early in my public high school years & THOSE approaches to fact finding have not been superceded yet by fake science, mystics, gurus, shamans, or conspiracy theorists. I'm waiting...
There are plenty of stone softening theories on RUclips to explain how such large blocks of stone fit together so closely. I would think that in this day and age, that someone, somewhere, would have tested these theories to see if any might be proven.
So basically it was done by magic ?
Okay that's cool dude, thanks for explaining this.
😅😂🤣
Of course if we suspend the laws of physics we can do some incredible things.
The laws of physics are magic, and you believe them because you were told to.
@@brindlebriar No we believe them because they have been proven. The creator of this video just talks out of his lying ass and spreads stupidity to the masses.
@@seditt5146 I have likewise been told that the laws of physics have been proven. But since they have not been proven to me personally, it would be unscientific for me to believe that, as to do so would constitute having blind faith in proclamations of other men. It would be to relate to scientists as if they were a clergy. I'm sure they would not want that.
@@brindlebriar all physics as we understand them inside this are the way they are. When you take the same ingredients and exspose the to different pressures ,vacuums electrical and somic waves in a weightless in enviourment you get different results. We are performing weightless exspiraments in space for a while . Perhaps there are answers there? We are learning new things daily i would think. Application is a different beast. I think honest scientists will tell you we have a lot to learn.
@Ra Akhanaten Everything must be explained to me personally in order for me to know it. If you have some magical thinking that allows you to know things by some other means, I was not endowed with such magic, sadly. Thus, I must employ the scientific approach, which is that one can know only what his been demonstrated to him to the satisfaction of all his doubts and critiques.
If you are able to know that something is true merely be someone having told you it is true, you are very lucky in that. But I must say I wonder about the reliability of that method.
The clip you used of the gear shift had 6 gears (5 forward, 1 reverse) + neutral, so neutral would be the "7th gear" not the 6th.
How many gears to I have while rolling forward?
Dear Harvey, your theory looks impressive, what would you consider to be required in terms of scientific support and resources in order to test its feasibility?
Further, does the term Phonon say anything to you? It is defined as a collective excitation in a periodic, elastic arrangement of atoms or molecules in condensed matter, specifically in solids and some liquids. Recent research has shown that phonons and rotons may have a non-negligible mass and be affected by gravity just as standard particles are. From this, it is predicted that phonons would deflect away as it detects the difference in densities, exhibiting the qualities of a negative gravitational field. Although the effect would be too small to measure, it is possible that future equipment could lead to successful results. In 2019, researchers were able to isolate individual phonons without destroying them for the first time. (Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon?oldformat=true )
I need to make better quality videos and continue to get thoughts and opinions from as many viewers as possible!
I'd like to be completely open minded and I have no prejudice. You have a theory and that is great. Call me a doubting Thomas or what ever but I need to see this demonstrated on this grand scale using the same tools that were available at the time. Melting pebbles in a Petri dish isn't going to cut it. The way I see it right now, either these people had advanced technologies we did not suspect or they had outside help. I would love to see proof that a people of ancient times had the ability to do things we can not do today.
Excellent video. Solid explanations backed by Evidence and pictures, not just THEORY. A+ dude!
I have seen this technology done to stone. Cut it like soft room temperature butter and put in place by a weightless arm & aligned to perfection. How?
Where is the evidence?
Almost sounds like if you countered the spin and strong force present in valence electrons turning them into neutrons/creating a net 0 electronic force then the material would act like a solid fluid. Similar to how superfluid helium exists with a homogenous molecular potential across the matter, if there was a net 0 valence spin then I imagine the material would be static but would also completely ducile to the touch.
Now I think such a material would act like a kinetic conductor, where the valence forces applied to the stone afterwards would be the influencing factor for its state of matter.
If that were the case I bet you could take a chisel and with a precise tap cleave a stone in 2 simply because the kinetic force will activate those neutralized valence shells from one to another as the shells are reneutralized and the kinetic force travels from particle to particle.
So the question is how do you neutralize the valence electron spin in a highly resistive material without lowering the temperature or pressure? Maybe if you could like inversely resonate just one valence electron after enough time you would eventually neutralize the material so long as the valence shells are interacting, though it's ultimatly a supertask to incrementally neutralize spin like that: you could keep neutralizing valence potential with frequency but will never reach an end point of 0.
Im sick of not being told the real truth about our history and worse is being fed answers that undermine my intelligence.
I always favored a chemical agent as being responsible for "melting" the stones into a seemless wall
Try prolonged powerful low frequency sound waves. After that, try powerful high frequency radio waves. After that, try both at the same time. After that, try harmonics, the possibilities are almost endless.
Very cool and very interesting
I'm still stuck on the beaver problem.
they wont let you tear down a pyramid for science... ancient ruins are protected from ideas like this so that we will still have them in the future.
Can you elaborate on the weight loss of the rocks? I don’t quite understand how something can lose weight?
It can’t. 99.95% of an atom’s mass is in its nucleus, and messing with the electrons won’t change that. It CAN let you use electrostatic forces to oppose gravity (like how static lets your hair stand on end), but IF you could get a stone block to hover a mm above another block similarly chargesdwith extra electrons, God help anyone near it when it all discharges.
So would that permit folding granite as well as cutting it? Are there examples anywhere?
Well done. Would this be scalable enough to deal with an oncoming outer space object? Some of us are already practicing telekinesis for that very reason.
❤️ beautiful channel, thank you sir, +1 like and sub
Nah dude.. I don't want theories.. I want videos. This shit is a cop out.
So prove your theory by example
People with the level of technology you are advocating, a technology beyond where we are today, would be doing other things with it and all the other technology that goes along with it just like we are.
@Todd Hendrix I do not see anything that regular people could not do with the great pyramid. The hardest job would be cutting the pink granite for the king's chamber. If you have the time regular ppl can cut it.
real knowledge is allways kept away from common people ,otherwise you cannot control them....
Interesting. In Iron age Scotland we melted basalt by using the charcoals from burning gorse.
Plants can eat through stone. Soaking the rocks in water with some type of plants are one way this was done. I have seen interviews of tribes people explaining this.
Similar to Sonic welders used today. Atleast to assemble resin parts in auto industry.
Hey guys we gotta hurry,these rocks are starting to get heavy,
Total new meaning!
Valence Neutralisation Theorem. Got it!
Dude, I searched "how was megalithic structures built" and you came up. Keep it up man. Clearly, the ancients used some technique not known to us and clearly they used a tool that we are not aware of - clearly. Don't stop. We are all still watching, even in 2021. Conventional thinking will get us nowhere. Remember, Jimmy started out just like you. Today's travelling with Brien.
I got an email from Ben yesterday. He's in Cusco with Brien filming some new stuff. Jimmy's there too? God I'd love to listen in on that fun! I'll just have to wait for the video!
What about (dare i say it) the Geopolymer theory?? It gets frowned upon but that is the likeliest theory for me. Also explains why some granite blocks are degrading "inside out" and how some rocks look like they have melted. The nubs are the red herring though... How were these produced/left using the geopolymer theory if the blocks were "poured" in place? Fascinating stuff.
Great video.. I agree.. There must have been some kind of technology that is unknown to modern man..
I also think they used natural stuff such as ice,, for friction, movement and precision. Ice is extremely powerful when it expands and can easily withstand hundreds of tons if the ice sheet is on solid ground even if the ice sheet is a few millimeter thick,,, Ice causes friction with granite and you can place heavy objects with precision.. And if some of the megalithic monuments are older than 15000 years then im sure they used ice as a tool/method, but unfortunately when ice is mentioned it is not even being considered because of the timeline to the old kingdom and such,, But,, if they knew how to create ice or if they had the temperature for water to become ice, then moving 100-ton blocks in serapeum would be much easier than any other method because of the friction. Of course i'm not claiming anything, it is just a thought.
Thanx for the video, i found it very interesting. Cheers.
They completely dismantled Stonehenge and rebuilt it.
It seems to me that we need to study the mating surfaces of two adjacent rocks. If rock softening was done you would expect to be able to deduce the sequence as there should always be a bulging unbound surface which is later mated to a new block.
The one key component that ancient people utilized to achieve such exactness that no modern man can definitely understand this concept due to these Struthers already existing is. Simply. Time. Science and historians theorize, surmise and hypothesize the advent of these structures but even with that, people can't grasp the actual concept of how long it took native people(s) to build such a structure. It didn't take advanced level math and computations it was just feel like a master machinist holding precision measurements in microns as oppose to a greenhorn machinist going into the trade. The time it takes the greenhorn to develope the "feel" of a master machinist may have been the equivalent for ancient people to do the same in the most simplist ways as to be unacceptable by the best scientific minds. So, is it any wonder, these may be one of the wonders of the world?
Could this valence neutralization be achieved via plant extracts?
Not by itself. I think there are several ingredients that need to applied,,, sonics, energy, plant extracts and more,,
Stone can be easily softened. Just heat it sufficiently. QED. No gas laws modified.
What is the chemical components of granite?
mostly silica larger than 65 % and minimum quartz content of 20 %
@@GroberWeisenstein all of these are part of granite with similar silica content
damn this sounds legit. great explanation of the nubs. many ancient myths revolving around sound and its power i think they already know a lot they arent telling us. great presentation