One of the finest Discussion on very important topic.. thanks Dr Vikram Sampath for throwing brighter light on Veer Sawarkar and the truth behind his ple. Also you put forth rightly the contribution of many movements in freedom struggle. The Leftist history and biasing of Muslim rulers and fading the real History of Indian subcontinent...
Mr Mukherjee is telling the same narrative we were taught in schools, which was hard to believe to many even at a young age. Hats off to Mr Vikram Sampat’s broader views.
पहले तो लल्लनटॉप को साधुवाद। मैं सावरकर जी को जानता नही था, मतलब सिर्फ नाम सुना था। लेकिन इस बहस में दोनों ने दमदार बातें कहीं लेकिन फिर भी विक्रम जी की बाते कहीं न कहीं अधिक उचित रही । मैं विक्रम जी से सहमत हो पाया हुँ।
Hats off to young energetic dynamic historian Vikram ji... Bang on factual no nonsense talks... We need more scholar like u, unbiased and true to the history, not whitewash it or politically correct... Keep it on Sir ☺️☺️
Why people of North apply their logic of rajputs and tej bahadur ji' seer kata denge par jhukayenge nahi ' saab app hare the jyada idealism ko manke 😂 Shivaji maharaj ne khud ko choota batane ko strategy banaya tha called as hide your strength to fool enemy. Wo realistic the isliye mughlo ko marathe kadmo par lane me safal hue. For shivaji maharaj and savarkar ultimate result was priority rather then compromise in way to archive it. 😅
The debate continues no doubt for ever because east cannot meet west! How shrewd and shameless when you are always dragging Baba Saheb Ambedkar in so many instances!! Unfortunately this is how you people were the champions of Casteism in India!!!
@@udaymarndi139 No, it's totally opposite. Bringing Dr Ambedkar here with his views was right as he took different take than Gandhi and congress almost always but no historian will dare to take his name in bad light due to his unchallenged position in India today.........but bcz Savarkar has no following like Baba Saheb he will be abused just bcz he took congress and gandhiji head on..and this is double standard our great historians have been showing since independence.
@@udaymarndi139 and please i will like to know from you why Dr Ambedkar should not be bring?? He had written and spoken on every major issue concern to us as collective indians that is still haunting us...
After 57:30 professor ji didn't throw in facts to counter Sampath Ji.... He felt shattered and got emotional and kept flooding emotions over facts or to say he tried to keep alive his narrative driven by emotions, Vikram on the other hand kept correcting him... Debate was awesome...
What a debate! Vikram and Sai, these guys are changing the discourse of our history. Watch Sai discussion with Shashi Tharoor, the way he is destroying Shashi is worth watching.
@@kritagya.Rajawat Left has the monopoly of revolution against the State, no doubt about that, therefore all revolutionists aka "krantikaris" were leftists. The question is, what is INDn left revolting against now? against whom? the INDn State?
Dr Vikram Sampath ji completely owned this debate. I feel historians like Mukherjee are opposing these ideas just because they've written books on history only through the lens of one narrative and admitting that will lead to complete disregard of their business, but what they don't realize is that their history books will be read less and less as people of the country realize the truth.
We should put out the clemency petitions then discuss. I have read them, so poor in taste. Bhagat Singh who is just 23 yrs old, refused to file any such petition, whereas deceitful Sarvarkar by lying and prostrating to English law. Shameful!
He is maharashtrian and knows and read Savarkars and babasaheb ambedkar s books and profesor sahab toh marathi jante nahi unko sirf congress ne likha hua history pata hai 😂
Vikram Sampath rocks man…!! This is how we do peer reviewing in medicine..!! The JNU prof was looking clueless and was trying his level best to sound credible.. god save JNU if it had such low iq profs..!! If the JNU prof had to defend his thesis in front of examiners he would have failed miserably..!! Thoroughly disappointed with the JNU “History” prof…
It's apparent that Vikram Sampath's presentation of arguments and facts was incredibly compelling. While Professor Mukherjee from JNU appeared to struggle, relying more on emotional appeal rather than factual evidence. It's intriguing to note the prevalence of left-leaning intellectuals from JNU, a phenomenon that prompts further exploration. Witnessing Prof. Mukherjee's thorough dismantling by Vikram through logical arguments and factual evidence brought a sense of satisfaction.
The problem for old historian is that young people are started questioning and we believe in facts 😊 great debate Dr Vikram you have gained a new fan today 🙏💪
ए जो विद्वता का बखान कर रहे हैं ए महोदय एक दिन भी सेलुलर जेल में नहीं रहे हैं किन्तु फिर भी सावरकर को पूर्ण रूप से गलत साबित कर रहा है । यह मूर्ख मुखर्जी उनकी लाइफ के संघर्स को कमतर करके बता रहा है ये लोग बड़े कृतघ्नता में डूबे हुए हैं इनका फ्रीडम में कोई सहयोग नहीं है । किन्तु फिर भी सावरकर जैसे वीरों को गाली देते हैं । मेरे विचार से इनका मुह नोच लेना चाहिए । दोनो भाई 18से52 साल तक जेल में रहे इतना बड़ा दुख उठाया फिर भी उन्हें कायर बताते हैं इससे बड़े वेदनपूरन दूसरी बात नहीं हो सकता है
Bhai books padiye official journal read kariye phir agar savaarkar or rss ko gaali na do guarantee ha... Sahab inka rss hindu mahasabha, savaarkar ka itihaas rha ha chaakri ka
If there had to be a nutshell version of how left in India operates, Mr. Mukherjee right here in this debate is a testament to it. Thank you Dr. Sampath.
He is always like that because he is that kind of journalists who don't have .0001% of knowledge about history ...he is just good example of progressive person who achieve his position by doing "chatukarita"
I am 73 years old ,they teach us how to write applications and we are told to use ,faithfully , obedient and these kind of words in independent Indian schools
baba dhongi hote h aur bhakt gadha hote h? ye h secularism? India k muslim dekh lo 8cr se 28 cr, aur Bangladesh m hindu dekh lo 28 cr se 8cr pahonch gaye (1947 census). parivarwad desh ka gaan* mar diya h. desh ko jihadyon se nahin librandon se khatra h.
The Debate was very healthy.. Really knowledgeable and factual argument... Both are very knowledgeable person but i really liked sampat sir facts and knowledge... Thankyou team lallantop🙂
Please dont display ignorance. History is not about facts. It is about the relationships between fact and interpretation. Read E.H. Carr and tells you why Sampat is off key and has a long way to go before he calls himself a historian.
Very impress by Mr Vikram .. respect sir, you have brought so many new dimensions to the over all freedom movement - than what we have been thought in school..
Prof. Aditya Mukherjee lost his hold on Rationality and started making emotional comments, is a Testimony of his defeat in the debate.. I think, Mr Vikram Sampath made very cogent arguments without loosing his cool. He has won this debate..👍
Yes, he also made a few personal comments, while saying that ‘Vikarm bhi What’sapp jaisa narrative ki side ja rehe hain’ and fer aak politician k opinion k basis pe Savarkar ko bolna k wo Gandhi ji k murder mai involved the jab supreme court tak ne kuch ni paya….ajeeb historian h🤷🏻♂️
Aditya mukarjee jaise log, apne under kisi neural opinion wale student ko PHD karne dete honge? Never. Yahi issue h leftist historians ka, wo apne side ki hi story endorse karte hain, politician ban jate hain
Now one can Safely say that ANDH BHAKTS are everywhere in every ideology. No matter how one label themselves as Leftist, Historian , Liberal, Secular, Progressive.
Hats off to Vikram Sampat ji.. The amount of research that would have gone into offering an alternative narration of history which is missing from our mainstream history is just inspiring. 🙏
@@mahboobahmad4060 n vikram sampath ji jo hua h vo usko hi to bata re h....agr tum samajhte ho ki vo galat keh re h to counter kro....democracy h ...daro ni.mobile se bahar ni ayega koi
@@mahboobahmad4060 where he called Gandhiji was not a hero....he just pointed out what is wrong is to brush aside full interpretation of other heroes like subhas Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh in order just to make Gandhi and congress even bigger than it really was ...... Point is Gandhiji was undoubtedly great but equally or even more was the role of Netaji in freeing india...... And also gandhi was hero does not mean Savarkar was villain
Shubham Trivedi:: prayer for Climency was right or wrong, is endless debate. so let us stop it. A big question is what was the contribution of sawarkar in freedom What did he do extraordinary or sacrificed for the nation for which He shuold be honourned with "Bharat Ratna."?
@@CH-ng8ei और तुम पक्के वामपंथी देश के 40 टुकड़े करने वाले चीन और भारत के युद्ध में अपने जवानों को खून नहीं देने का अभियान चलाने वाले वामपंथी कम्युनिस्ट कांग्रेस के चमचे तुम लोगों को हकीकत बताओ तो तुम लोगों को पक्का मिर्ची लग जाती है बाद में तुम्हें कुछ रहने को नहीं रहता तो तुम लोग अंधभक्त कह देते हो🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
One of the reason the discussion in Savarkar is so sensible is there is no Randeep Sardesai. Both guests are learned. I am more impressed by the logical conclusion drawn by Dr. Sampath. Congratulations Sourabh and Nikhil for your superb work.
Vikram is a veritable intellectual, erudite and very well versed with facts and nuances. He is so articulate and forms his arguments extremely well. He is a gem and I thank Lallantop to bring out such an extraordinary conversation.
Vikram Ji ki itihaas ki Jaankari dekh kar bahut khushi hui!! We should not fight over our Great Revolutionary Politicians,be it Savarkar,Gandhi Ji,Bhagat Singh,Neta Ji,Udham Singh and others!!
@@adichauhan3713 yes i did mere basic two lines that both parties are in-fact enough to say so there is no shortage of revolutionaries new names need to be dug out of history
Savarkar become evil for the society after releasing from jail and lived life on British pension.... Like before 1930-1940 jinnah never demanded separate nation and he fought with British and fought cases for Inc members, but it will not wash his Image what he did after.... All it matters what happens in the end. Savarkar is not a Veer
@@maratha8808.....sukr hai ye ni bola ki Gandhi ji ne two nation theory di th.....maafiveer k kukarmo ko chupana pd rha hai kisi ur ka naam lga kr......
57:33 professor reaction 😂😂 Tata bye bye, khel khtam, Well done Vikaram sampat Sir, truly factual analysis 🙏 there are many complex thread in history. Till now we have read only congress side history,there is strong need to reclaim the history with some other perspective! At last very good conclusion from both fine mind of history, Sampat You r doing great job 🙏
अंग्रेज़ सावरकर को पेंशन दिया करते थे, साठ रुपए महीना. वो अंग्रेज़ों की कौन सी ऐसी सेवा करते थे, जिसके लिए उनको पेंशन मिलती थी ? वो इस तरह की पेंशन पाने वाले अकेले शख़्स थे। क्योंकि वो अंग्रेजों के लिए मुखबिरी करते थे
Man Vikram Sampath is such a composed debater!! He completely owned prof. Mukherjee through his factual rebuttals. One can see that Prof. Mukherjee is complete flustered by Vikram's arguments.. I just hope Vikram continues on this path and more power to him as he has now become the prime target of the left ecosystem
Very nicely hostly debate Saurabh on such a contested topic. I am from Mumbai so I have heard about Vir Savarkar since my school days and I never knew that he was so misunderstood. Vikram Sampath did such a fine job to explain Vir Savarkar and highlight very important point that all different ideas which worked during freedom movement and Congress/MK Gandhi was not the only freedom movement. If this was a trial then my vote is for Vikram Sampat's argument.
A well organized debate on history. Thanks Saurabh for bringing the historians together and having such a civic debate. Vikram was superb with his clarity.
@@nabinbanik6664 samajh gya bhai tum political aadmi ho, tumhe facts se koi matlab nhi hai tumhe tumari vichar dhara adhik priya hai isliye tumhe tumare dwara lagaye gye aaropo ko jawab dena waste hai, kyoki tumare sabhi aaropo ka jawab is video me vikram sampat ne diya hai joki ek historian hai, fir bhi tumhe nahi manana to mai kya hi bolu
Hats off to Prof Mukherjee! Despite employing rhetoric, selective reading and no synthesis of facts, the Prof enjoyed eminent historian status for so long. Truly remarkable achievement! Need to detoxify myself after having consumed this junk during school by eminent historians.
Vikram's research in the issue is amazing and reveals a lot of facts not known to us ,he has been clearly prove that the name of saber ker is being slandered by likes of prof mukharji he has nothing new to tell us and has been doing this rhetoric in the past,
आपको हृदय से आभार सौरव जी। विक्रम संपत जी विशेष हार्दिक बधाई। इतना सुंदर इतिहास का वर्णन विक्रम जी कि हर बात का तर्क और सबूत के मजा आ गया। फिर से बधाई।💐💐💐🙏🙏🙏
Vikram sir. RESPECT. Agar hme ap jaise teacher and professors mile hote to aj Hamara future bhi kuch aur hota. Apke jaise teacher and professors har school and college me hone chahiye. Love from me sir. Humble people with great knowledge.
Brilliant discussion by Vikram Sampath, a different perspective of looking at history, thanks Lallantop for this beautiful debate on these portions of history which has been always under covers
वीर सावरकर भी स्वतंत्रता सेनानी था लेकिन भद्दे तरीके से माफी मांगने के बाद माफी वीर भारतीय स्वतंत्रता सेनानी के रूप में अप्रासंगिक हो गए हैं, लेकिन धर्म के नाम पर माफी वीर को वीर बनाया जा रहा है।
In my opinion the JNU professor not only exposed himself, but also exposed Communists (SA Dange) & Congress! His anger & hate against current BJP government is clearly visible in face & words! That victorious smile betrays defeat!
@@indianjaihind4125 what atrocities ? Atrocity , genocide , fascism , dictatorship are words which have immense meaning. Today you using them & nothing happening to you is itself proof against what you allege the current government for .
@@prayagjoshi1179 what ? Check how many time BJP shut down internet, how many they used article 124 , how many people got caught under UAPA just because of they were speaking against BJP .
@@ziaqazi41 he must be glorified because he has sacrificed his life for this country. The next generation must know about him and his ideology. You have done nothing so pls don't comment on him. I think you are from santipriya majahab
@@lawplanet2818 yeah I agreed I think we should give respect all the freedom fighters chahe vo mangal pandey ho ya tilak sayad hm sabko hi bhul gye h and iska use kisi party k mtlb k liye n ho BJP congress aayenge jayenge but we want to know truth
Awesome debate! Facts vs fiction! And its always refreshing to hear young scholars like Vikram, make their points in a very lucid and and in an informed way! I am also glad that the right wing scholars have found a place where their voices also can be counted!! Thank you saurabh dwivedi! You let us hear this wonderful debate without interrupting and trying to be one up! You have the makings of a great anchor.
57:33 JNU के सर्टिफाइड बुद्धिजीवी का रिएक्शन देखकर हंसी रुकने का नाम ही नहीं ले रहा है. 😂😂😃 सत्य को परेशान किया जा सकता है पर पराजित नहीं. Well done Vikram Sir.
Being so young Dr, Vikram can be way more sarcastic than the professor yet he choose to be on point, no laughing chuckling about anyone just facts and views of many person, and so polite that itself nailed the debate on the other hand the professor knowledge and points are so weaker that it looks like did he even the right person to debate on this with Dr. Sampath. I read you Vikram and your writings with so many quoted facts gives a very large knowledge base if someone goes by each quoted facts.
This is brilliant debate and the way Vikram Sampath has put forward his 'point of view' with facts and logic is commendable. Very well organised and conducted. Saurabh Dwivedi..more power to you..
It is quite intriguing for me that people like Mr. Mukherjee is a Prof in JNU. He restored to only rhetoric, try to misquote Vikram, and more importantly very close minded for different of opinion. Vikram is just brilliant and crisp and so factual in his presentation.
Truly agreed brother....and my converation with jnu students....cohort the same mindset as they cannot accept other persons views....how come they are so great
@Abhishek Panigrahi This should not be intriguing at all. What else do you expect from a JNU prof? The only criterion to become JNU prof is to peddle leftist agenda and prof Mukherjee is doing what is expected of him. At one point he mentioned “Discovery of India” as one of the best books on Indian history. That itself is a testimony on his scholarship on Indian history.
I think every extremists , every liberal citizen must go through this intellectual debate of both the unbiased historian. I have never seen such beautiful conversations on any platform. Vikram bhaiya is my new favourite personality to follow and I will defiantly go through the written works of Prof. Mukherjee as well. Thanks to The Lallantop and Saurabh bhaiya for this episode and last but not the least Nikhil bhai is a good and active listener. Keep going. Regards ❤️🙏💐🍫
Prof. Aditya Mukherjee came across as an emotional man with a bias. He should have defended or accepted the "communist leader's" petition letter,, but he chose to ignore it, and give an emotional rhetoric. THIS itself shows that he is selective in his truth . On the other hand, Vikram came across as calm, curious and respectful. Vikram WINS Hands-down.
Jnu vale pasand is liye nahi hai. Vo mante hum kahe vo sach baki juth. Aur kuch bolte bolte vo has dege jo dekh k hi gussa aata hai. Jab samne vala professionally behave kar rah hai to tum kyu nahi kar rahe. Kuch bi bhonk k chale jate hai ye jnu vale.
By the end the JNU professor was out of quotes and facts and reasoning that he just started to outright say things like I feel sad that you r saying these things even though mr. Sampat had not said those things and in his closing statement he demeans Smapat by implying that he feels like Sampat's "reasoned" argument is based on whatsapp forward...like dude Sampat has only talked about historical references and documents so how does whatsapp forward come into the scene.. so basically the JNU professor was just a sore loser who would rather demean when he doesn't have "Actual" points to counter than just accept that he agrees with what was said by Sampat and he doesn't have anything to add or counter that.
Vikram ji was flawless. There were always doubts in my mind regarding the episode of Indian history , which I was taught in my school. Vikram ji's explanation really made things very clear.
आज भी पुलिस ने मुखबिर को बहुत स्वतंत्रता दी जाती है उसकी अभिव्यक्ति छुपाने की ऐसा ही अंग्रेजों के शासन काल से चला आ रहा है मतलब इन्होंने अगर माफी मांगी यह देश के वफादार कहां हुए बस माफीनामा ही सत्यता का प्रमाण है
मुझे बताओ देश बांटने का काम किसने किया । डिवाइड एंड रूल पॉलिसी का जनक अगर अंग्रेज नहीं होते । तो उनके बच्चे भाजपा में पैदा कहां से होते । पूछता है भारत वंदे मातरम ।
इतनी ताकत से बोल रहा है भाई मेरा कि गांधी जी ने बोला था । तो मुझे यह बताओ के यह मेरा भाई वही खड़ा था । क्या जब गांधी जी ने बोला था । अगर यह गांधीजी के साथी है । तो इनके नाम हिस्ट्री में क्यों नहीं आते हैं ।
@@ziaqazi41 How is talking about facts equates to creating hate and division? It is when the lies are caught people are divided. As you said, if the history books didn't lie about Mughals and glorified them, this hatred wouldn't have happened in the long run. Most Muslims today are not the descendants of Mughals, why should they feel bad about it? It's like Christians feeling bad when we slam the British.
@@DHIRAJKUMAR-qo1jm मैं आपको नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस द्वारा लिखित एक किताब का नाम बता रहा हूँ जिसमें सुभाष चन्द्र Bose ने अपने आप को एक Left Winger (अथवा Leftist) बुलाके पुकारा है तथा महात्मा Gandhi [i∙e∙ Mohandaas Karamchand Gaandhii] को Right Winger बुलाकर पुकारा है. उसी same किताब में Netaajii सुभाष चन्द्र बोस ने विश्लेषित किया है कि क्यूँ {एवं किन कारणों के चलते} गांधी (i·e· मोहनदास करमचन्द गान्धी) के ख़िलाफ़ उनका मतभेद था. Name of that book is *The Alternative Leadership: Speeches, Articles, Statements and Letters June 1939 － 1941* authored by নেতাজি Subhaash Chandra Bose himself.
Really liked the conversation/debate....no tamasha....Vikram Sampath is amazing genuise Historian. He's a epitome of Talented historian. Last Question asked by anchor about keeping Objectivity & truth...was very important. Hope to see more debates like this. Very knowledgeable
@@amanjha7633 Jha ji, Jha ji, mai nahi Aapke mantri ji ne kuch dino pehle kaha.🤣🤣 Mai koun hota hoon savarkar ke bare me jankari rakhne wala. Woh to mantri ji nehi batate to hum unko mafiveer kaise mante 🤣🤣
baba dhongi hote h aur bhakt gadha hote h? ye h secularism? India k muslim dekh lo 8cr se 28 cr, aur Bangladesh m hindu dekh lo 28 % se 8% pahonch gaye (1947 census). parivarwad desh ka gaan* mar diya h. desh ko jihadyon se nahin librandon se khatra h.
I greatly admire Mr Sampat for his honesty and knowledge. Salute Sir
I am totally agreed with Dr. Vikram.
from Jharkhand.
One of the finest Discussion on very important topic.. thanks Dr Vikram Sampath for throwing brighter light on Veer Sawarkar and the truth behind his ple. Also you put forth rightly the contribution of many movements in freedom struggle. The Leftist history and biasing of Muslim rulers and fading the real History of Indian subcontinent...
Mr Mukherjee is telling the same narrative we were taught in schools, which was hard to believe to many even at a young age. Hats off to Mr Vikram Sampat’s broader views.
पहले तो लल्लनटॉप को साधुवाद।
मैं सावरकर जी को जानता नही था, मतलब सिर्फ नाम सुना था। लेकिन इस बहस में दोनों ने दमदार बातें कहीं लेकिन फिर भी विक्रम जी की बाते कहीं न कहीं अधिक उचित रही । मैं विक्रम जी से सहमत हो पाया हुँ।
Hats off to young energetic dynamic historian Vikram ji...
Bang on factual no nonsense talks...
We need more scholar like u, unbiased and true to the history, not whitewash it or politically correct...
Keep it on Sir ☺️☺️
He is 43 .
@@krishnashrivastava8364rahul is still a young netaji after crossing the age of 50
Why people of North apply their logic of rajputs and tej bahadur ji' seer kata denge par jhukayenge nahi ' saab app hare the jyada idealism ko manke 😂
Shivaji maharaj ne khud ko choota batane ko strategy banaya tha called as hide your strength to fool enemy.
Wo realistic the isliye mughlo ko marathe kadmo par lane me safal hue.
For shivaji maharaj and savarkar ultimate result was priority rather then compromise in way to archive it. 😅
unbiased?😂
@@KumarRohit_1206 Better than Niranjan Takle.
Another one bites the dust.. Kudos to Vikram 😀😀
Thousand kudos to the podcast and Mr Sampat for the truth and the total animical stance of the Commies and Congress to our Bharat
I am totally sold by Vikram Sampath's logical arguments.
What a great man!
Bikram Sampath rocks . History should be unbiased
Amazing debate! Vikram is amazing, and well informed historian.
The debate continues no doubt for ever because east cannot meet west! How shrewd and shameless when you are always dragging Baba Saheb Ambedkar in so many instances!! Unfortunately this is how you people were the champions of Casteism in India!!!
@@udaymarndi139 No, it's totally opposite.
Bringing Dr Ambedkar here with his views was right as he took different take than Gandhi and congress almost always but no historian will dare to take his name in bad light due to his unchallenged position in India today.........but bcz Savarkar has no following like Baba Saheb he will be abused just bcz he took congress and gandhiji head on..and this is double standard our great historians have been showing since independence.
@@udaymarndi139 and please i will like to know from you why Dr Ambedkar should not be bring??
He had written and spoken on every major issue concern to us as collective indians that is still haunting us...
@@udaymarndi139 baba saheb vi anrej o ka chusta tha. 😂. Unka khuda writings paro , fir ana bak bak karne.
वीर सावरकर जी ने 11वर्ष काला पानी की सजा भोगी हे अत्यंत कठीन परिस्थिती मे जीवित रहे सिर्फ अपने देश भक्ति को समर्पित किया. नमन शत शत नमन
विक्रम जी की जानकारी अद्भुत है , कई सवालों के जवाब मिले । धन्यवाद
Vikram is making me realize that we the younger generation can also create change . Thanks Vikram
What change you want? Everything is great under Modi and Shah ? Sampath is also right wing and like many minor bhakts ready to display his ignorance.
@@ladusingh2141 aa gaye leftist libtards to spread hate. Bachpan ka pyaar for leftist is hate.
He is giving reference of so called politician private secret chats, was he gone there with Time machine. Typical whatsapp chutiyapa
@@AvinashKumar-xl2vv he is a historian - only if you understand that
@@ladusingh2141 so what you want we should only read pigfan habib? that third rated lier?
Mr. sampat was absolutely bang on!!! What a lovely discussion by him. That man was factually so strong to the point.
After 57:30 professor ji didn't throw in facts to counter Sampath Ji.... He felt shattered and got emotional and kept flooding emotions over facts or to say he tried to keep alive his narrative driven by emotions, Vikram on the other hand kept correcting him...
Debate was awesome...
What a debate! Vikram and Sai, these guys are changing the discourse of our history. Watch Sai discussion with Shashi Tharoor, the way he is destroying Shashi is worth watching.
Sanjeev Sanyal is also worth listening.
@@anuragmishra6691 👌
@Vidhi ....very true
Mukherjee just putting his interpretation and opinion but Vikram putting Facts.
Maza aa gaya.
JNU Leftist Professor so poor with facts.
Well done Vikram Sampath 👍
Bhagat singh & Netaji leftist thhe woh bhi poor 🥹?
@@kritagya.Rajawat are bhai tab right wing matlab Congress gandhi ka sath tab. to leftist ka alag hi defination tha
@@kritagya.Rajawat Left has the monopoly of revolution against the State, no doubt about that, therefore all revolutionists aka "krantikaris" were leftists. The question is, what is INDn left revolting against now? against whom? the INDn State?
@@kritagya.Rajawat who said wo log leftist the
@@kritagya.Rajawat yha sentence m noun professor hain, or adjective leftist h....so don't mix bhagat singh (the Legend) with these rascals
Dr Vikram Sampath ji completely owned this debate. I feel historians like Mukherjee are opposing these ideas just because they've written books on history only through the lens of one narrative and admitting that will lead to complete disregard of their business, but what they don't realize is that their history books will be read less and less as people of the country realize the truth.
They have written history on the basis of patronage
They are not historian but Congressi Pet !!
विक्रम सम्पत चोर है
We should put out the clemency petitions then discuss. I have read them, so poor in taste. Bhagat Singh who is just 23 yrs old, refused to file any such petition, whereas deceitful Sarvarkar by lying and prostrating to English law. Shameful!
@@suchmooch603 Did you not hear the explanation given with examples by Vikram and Mukherjee?
Very impressed with Vikram's knowledge and belief system. And I agree with Saurabh, Rahul S should write a book. I for one will read it for sure
M also fan of sampath g bcz ye neutral hokar fact pe baat karte hain
Go to Pakistan
No word for Vikram . what a historien and knowleage he has .One of the best netanagri épisode
Mr.Mukherjee is struggling to present his version of history😀😀😀 and mr. Sampat just nailed it throughout the debate👍👍👍
He is maharashtrian and knows and read Savarkars and babasaheb ambedkar s books and profesor sahab toh marathi jante nahi unko sirf congress ne likha hua history pata hai 😂
Vikram is Treasure. Not because of the narrative but the honest efforts in bringing out the truth backed by facts
ऐसी तर्क संगत बहस हमेशा होते रहनी चाहिये संपत जी के तर्क बहुत शानदार थे |आशा करती हूँ कि आप फिर से किसी विषय को लेकर संपत जी से बात करें |
What logic he gave instead of being emotional partial ???
@@aakashsharma920 listen 👂
@@aakashsharma920 other guy was being emotional partial not Vikram
😱😱😱@@aakashsharma920
Vikram Sampath rocks man…!! This is how we do peer reviewing in medicine..!! The JNU prof was looking clueless and was trying his level best to sound credible.. god save JNU if it had such low iq profs..!! If the JNU prof had to defend his thesis in front of examiners he would have failed miserably..!! Thoroughly disappointed with the JNU “History” prof…
Which peer-reviewed Paper (or Thesis) is in favour of Vikram Sampath's sayings?
Which peer-reviewed Paper {or Thesis} is against Professor Aaditya Mukherjee?
You can't say about JNU they also have graduates like saurabh ❤
Sampat has agreed on almost all the count of what the prof said but in another tone.
Leftists are lo w IQ
Vikram Bhaiya, you are a shining light in appropriating Indian History in the very correct way🙏🏻
It's apparent that Vikram Sampath's presentation of arguments and facts was incredibly compelling. While Professor Mukherjee from JNU appeared to struggle, relying more on emotional appeal rather than factual evidence. It's intriguing to note the prevalence of left-leaning intellectuals from JNU, a phenomenon that prompts further exploration.
Witnessing Prof. Mukherjee's thorough dismantling by Vikram through logical arguments and factual evidence brought a sense of satisfaction.
The problem for old historian is that young people are started questioning and we believe in facts 😊 great debate Dr Vikram you have gained a new fan today 🙏💪
I second u
Me too
Why are u fan of a historian?
@@ahan106 because we are not fan of ganjediyans
ए जो विद्वता का बखान कर रहे हैं ए महोदय एक दिन भी सेलुलर जेल में नहीं रहे हैं किन्तु फिर भी सावरकर को पूर्ण रूप से गलत साबित कर रहा है । यह मूर्ख मुखर्जी उनकी लाइफ के संघर्स को कमतर करके बता रहा है ये लोग बड़े कृतघ्नता में डूबे हुए हैं इनका फ्रीडम में कोई सहयोग नहीं है । किन्तु फिर भी सावरकर जैसे वीरों को गाली देते हैं । मेरे विचार से इनका मुह नोच लेना चाहिए । दोनो भाई 18से52 साल तक जेल में रहे इतना बड़ा दुख उठाया फिर भी उन्हें कायर बताते हैं इससे बड़े वेदनपूरन दूसरी बात नहीं हो सकता है
विक्रम सम्पत जी, जे॰एन॰यू॰ गैंग को आज आपने अक़ेले ही धो डाला।
वाह लाजवाब।
“सत्य प्रताड़ित हो सकता है लैकिन परास्त नहीं हो सकता।”
🙏🙏🙏🙏
So JNU se to saurabh dewedi bhi h kya unko bhi bol rhe and second JNU is best collage of India
Sampath Dalal Jo mafi mange Veer nahin ho sakta Vada Lal aur Gaddar angrejon ka Dalal angrejon ka
Sampat saral sabko pata hai Veer kabhi mafi nahin manta
Sab log mafi mangte to Desh Azad Ho Gaya hota
Tum jaise angrejo ke Dalal
Sampat Rocks....India needs more historians like Vikram Sampat
Not Dear Like Vikram Sir
Bhai books padiye official journal read kariye phir agar savaarkar or rss ko gaali na do guarantee ha... Sahab inka rss hindu mahasabha, savaarkar ka itihaas rha ha chaakri ka
@@shubham-uc6ih they trust only 5 years old history of what's app. 🤣
@@jalkaura ye flat earth gang.
He is whatsapp 🌟
I am totally agreed with Dr. Vikram
from Jharkhand.
If there had to be a nutshell version of how left in India operates, Mr. Mukherjee right here in this debate is a testament to it. Thank you Dr. Sampath.
rightly said
And also how the right operates Sampath chap is a testament to that!!!!!
very good discussions &argument a treat to the brain .
@@truth7653 why your ass Is burning, bawasir ho gya hai to dawa le lo
shubham tiwari, here comes an RSS bajrang dal Godse wala thug. Kala topi, half pant, stick in hand Mohan Bhagwat stooge!!
Vikram Sampath is truly a historian...truthful, honest,unbiased and above all Very very ARTICULATE..Kudos to him🙏👍
Nikhil is the most disappointed person here because today he got some knowledge about the *History*
Love You Sampath, Sir!!! Killed it❤️
El bar ko lga nikhil bhai apna screen pause markar chale gye
निखिल जी समझदार हैं उनको यह अच्छे से मालूम है कि कहां मुँह बिल्कुल नहीं खोलना है।
@@dushyantks haha .. vaise uska contribution bhi etana hi hai 🤣
He is always like that because he is that kind of journalists who don't have .0001% of knowledge about history ...he is just good example of progressive person who achieve his position by doing "chatukarita"
@@amitsingh-si8vd true 😂
I am 73 years old ,they teach us how to write applications and we are told to use ,faithfully , obedient and these kind of words in independent Indian schools
44th minute onwards is pure gold . Vikram
Sampath completely roasts the JNU professor.
Khud roast hogaya Vikram uske age ka dekho😂
Abe bhang kha k dekh rha hai kya??
baba dhongi hote h aur bhakt gadha hote h? ye h secularism?
India k muslim dekh lo 8cr se 28 cr, aur Bangladesh m hindu dekh lo 28 cr se 8cr pahonch gaye (1947 census). parivarwad desh ka gaan* mar diya h.
desh ko jihadyon se nahin librandon se khatra h.
@@pratham665 age matter nhi krti facts krte h. Narratives bna k history ni chalti.
@@AshishSharma-bj8hh ye yhi krte h victim nd lachari card khelenge
The Debate was very healthy.. Really knowledgeable and factual argument... Both are very knowledgeable person but i really liked sampat sir facts and knowledge... Thankyou team lallantop🙂
👍👍👍
Nice debate. Young historian Vikram Sampat was so much factual. Hats off. We need this type of scholars in every field in India🇮🇳.
Leftist destroyed..they are intellectual till no one question them.. the moment they are questioned they start rhetoric.
He is a closet sanghi...but with a charming smile
He is not a historian
Please dont display ignorance. History is not about facts. It is about the relationships between fact and interpretation. Read E.H. Carr and tells you why Sampat is off key and has a long way to go before he calls himself a historian.
@@ladusingh2141 historians should display the findings not to interp...
1:17:05 - Vikram Sampath completely demolished Mukherjee's argument in roughly 35 secs 👍
Absolutely
Very impress by Mr Vikram .. respect sir, you have brought so many new dimensions to the over all freedom movement - than what we have been thought in school..
Prof. Aditya Mukherjee lost his hold on Rationality and started making emotional comments, is a Testimony of his defeat in the debate.. I think, Mr Vikram Sampath made very cogent arguments without loosing his cool. He has won this debate..👍
That's the problem with leftist
agree with you
Yes, he also made a few personal comments, while saying that ‘Vikarm bhi What’sapp jaisa narrative ki side ja rehe hain’ and fer aak politician k opinion k basis pe Savarkar ko bolna k wo Gandhi ji k murder mai involved the jab supreme court tak ne kuch ni paya….ajeeb historian h🤷🏻♂️
Aditya mukarjee jaise log, apne under kisi neural opinion wale student ko PHD karne dete honge? Never. Yahi issue h leftist historians ka, wo apne side ki hi story endorse karte hain, politician ban jate hain
Now one can Safely say that ANDH BHAKTS are everywhere in every ideology. No matter how one label themselves as Leftist, Historian , Liberal, Secular, Progressive.
Hats off to Vikram Sampat ji.. The amount of research that would have gone into offering an alternative narration of history which is missing from our mainstream history is just inspiring. 🙏
Sampat means ghandh
Is not hero of India independent.sawaker is the hero of our country
@@mahboobahmad4060 n vikram sampath ji jo hua h vo usko hi to bata re h....agr tum samajhte ho ki vo galat keh re h to counter kro....democracy h ...daro ni.mobile se bahar ni ayega koi
@@mahboobahmad4060 Abdul sometimes think rationally beyond ur religion
@@mahboobahmad4060 where he called Gandhiji was not a hero....he just pointed out what is wrong is to brush aside full interpretation of other heroes like subhas Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh in order just to make Gandhi and congress even bigger than it really was ......
Point is Gandhiji was undoubtedly great but equally or even more was the role of Netaji in freeing india......
And also gandhi was hero does not mean Savarkar was villain
Shubham Trivedi:: prayer for
Climency was right or wrong, is endless debate. so let us stop it.
A big question is what was the contribution of sawarkar in freedom
What did he do extraordinary or sacrificed for the nation for which He shuold be honourned with "Bharat Ratna."?
Most civilised and fact based debate of this century I would say👏👏
Vikram sir seems quite rational.... I was shocked listening to him.
विक्रम पक्का अंधभक्त है,
@@CH-ng8ei और तुम पक्के वामपंथी देश के 40 टुकड़े करने वाले चीन और भारत के युद्ध में अपने जवानों को खून नहीं देने का अभियान चलाने वाले वामपंथी कम्युनिस्ट कांग्रेस के चमचे तुम लोगों को हकीकत बताओ तो तुम लोगों को पक्का मिर्ची लग जाती है बाद में तुम्हें कुछ रहने को नहीं रहता तो तुम लोग अंधभक्त कह देते हो🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@CH-ng8ei Prof. Mukherjee real account se aao 🙄
Vikram Sampath has nailed this show!!
One of the reason the discussion in Savarkar is so sensible is there is no Randeep Sardesai. Both guests are learned. I am more impressed by the logical conclusion drawn by Dr. Sampath.
Congratulations Sourabh and Nikhil for your superb work.
Jabardast Vikram sampath ji... Pranam🙏🕉🚩
Vikram is a veritable intellectual, erudite and very well versed with facts and nuances. He is so articulate and forms his arguments extremely well. He is a gem and I thank Lallantop to bring out such an extraordinary conversation.
Would RSS, BJP and all fringe elements of these feel shame 4 their andhbhakti towards coward savarkar..
@@sujoybiswas7147 Well done bro...your first point is superb...
@@ajazsayed5327 have you read about savarkar Or just got your knowledge from what's app university??
they are all are dancing on Bjp songs ...
1942 movement involved India's p
Vikram Ji ki itihaas ki Jaankari dekh kar bahut khushi hui!!
We should not fight over our Great Revolutionary Politicians,be it Savarkar,Gandhi Ji,Bhagat Singh,Neta Ji,Udham Singh and others!!
Kya baat boli vaah debate dialogue theek h jhagda karoge toh azadi ka balidaan toh vyarth gya
@@ahan106 hmm..
I hope,that politicians should also understand that!!
Dont write savarkar or maafkars name along with them not even before tham
@@dapinderjitsingh did you even watch the whole debate?
@@adichauhan3713 yes i did mere basic two lines that both parties are in-fact enough to say so there is no shortage of revolutionaries new names need to be dug out of history
आज सावरकर जी के प्रति मेरा विचार बदलने के लिए धन्यवाद विक्रम सर
🙏
@@ziaqazi41 Har jagah comment kar raha hai, thoda open mind se video to dekh le
थैंक्स विक्रम संपत सर, आपने सावरकर की इज्जत पर बहुत शानदार बात कही है, वामपंथियों को तगड़ा जबाब दिया है.
Vikram Sampath changed my opinion on Veer Savarkar.He put facts brilliantly. Going to buy his book for sure.
True💯 Agree with you brother
Savarkar become evil for the society after releasing from jail and lived life on British pension.... Like before 1930-1940 jinnah never demanded separate nation and he fought with British and fought cases for Inc members, but it will not wash his Image what he did after.... All it matters what happens in the end. Savarkar is not a Veer
@@sarfarazafzal7038 half truths. Read the book.
@@sarfarazafzal7038 सैयद अहमद खां ने टू नेशन थ्योरी दी थी!
गद्दार, गद्दार ही रहेगे, आखिर अरबों के गुलाम जो है
@@maratha8808.....sukr hai ye ni bola ki Gandhi ji ne two nation theory di th.....maafiveer k kukarmo ko chupana pd rha hai kisi ur ka naam lga kr......
57:33 professor reaction 😂😂 Tata bye bye, khel khtam, Well done Vikaram sampat Sir, truly factual analysis 🙏 there are many complex thread in history.
Till now we have read only congress side history,there is strong need to reclaim the history with some other perspective! At last very good conclusion from both fine mind of history,
Sampat You r doing great job 🙏
अंग्रेज़ सावरकर को पेंशन दिया करते थे, साठ रुपए महीना. वो अंग्रेज़ों की कौन सी ऐसी सेवा करते थे, जिसके लिए उनको पेंशन मिलती थी ? वो इस तरह की पेंशन पाने वाले अकेले शख़्स थे। क्योंकि वो अंग्रेजों के लिए मुखबिरी करते थे
@@CH-ng8ei Read books, puncture waley!
This Prof😄 is a joke .. he couldn't stand facts .. he felt like a fish 🐟out of water 💧
😂😂 some people are just follower. All history not mentioned in discovery of India.
@@CH-ng8ei jaake whatsApp pe padhai kr e😁😁😁😁😁
Man Vikram Sampath is such a composed debater!! He completely owned prof. Mukherjee through his factual rebuttals. One can see that Prof. Mukherjee is complete flustered by Vikram's arguments.. I just hope Vikram continues on this path and more power to him as he has now become the prime target of the left ecosystem
Very nicely hostly debate Saurabh on such a contested topic. I am from Mumbai so I have heard about Vir Savarkar since my school days and I never knew that he was so misunderstood. Vikram Sampath did such a fine job to explain Vir Savarkar and highlight very important point that all different ideas which worked during freedom movement and Congress/MK Gandhi was not the only freedom movement. If this was a trial then my vote is for Vikram Sampat's argument.
Vikram, please keep up the good work. I have just bought your book after listening to this as I am sure I will learn a lot from your book.
A well organized debate on history. Thanks Saurabh for bringing the historians together and having such a civic debate. Vikram was superb with his clarity.
Thanks Nairjee.,I do agreed with your opinion but Saurabhjee should have taken more initiative to find out other hidden truths which are yet to come.
@@ramanathdash4394 l
A
@@fakhruddinarif6527 njk
History past politics aristotle
गजब की बहस! विक्रम जी की जानकारी अद्भूत है मजा आ गई ऐसी बहसों से हमारा भी ज्ञानवर्धन होता है।बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद सौरभ जी!
@@nabinbanik6664 video dekh lo, pta chal jayega agar neutral hoge to, varna mat dekho
@@nabinbanik6664 Muhammad jaise terrorist par kaun likhta hai book?
@@donalduncleusa6552 kalki abatar ji ta mohammad (s).....gita me likha hain
@@indiamylove4833 😂 nahi likha . Muhammad terrorist tha. Islam terrorism hai
@@nabinbanik6664 samajh gya bhai tum political aadmi ho, tumhe facts se koi matlab nhi hai tumhe tumari vichar dhara adhik priya hai isliye tumhe tumare dwara lagaye gye aaropo ko jawab dena waste hai, kyoki tumare sabhi aaropo ka jawab is video me vikram sampat ne diya hai joki ek historian hai, fir bhi tumhe nahi manana to mai kya hi bolu
Hats off to Prof Mukherjee! Despite employing rhetoric, selective reading and no synthesis of facts, the Prof enjoyed eminent historian status for so long. Truly remarkable achievement! Need to detoxify myself after having consumed this junk during school by eminent historians.
savage
😄😄😄😄👍
How savage 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Eminent historians don't try to smile and distort fact
Gajab 👌👌
No JNU professors 👨🏫 will face Vikram Sampath! You nailed him
Always hearing Mr Sampat and his Analysis on Veer Savarkar is eye opening.
I am so impressed by dr Vikram ji he is an amazing and well knowledged historian
❤️❤️❤️
Vikram's research in the issue is amazing and reveals a lot of facts not known to us ,he has been clearly prove that the name of saber ker is being slandered by likes of prof mukharji he has nothing new to tell us and has been doing this rhetoric in the past,
@@lalitsingh-hx2ts agree
आपको हृदय से आभार सौरव जी।
विक्रम संपत जी विशेष हार्दिक बधाई।
इतना सुंदर इतिहास का वर्णन विक्रम जी कि हर बात का तर्क और सबूत के मजा आ गया।
फिर से बधाई।💐💐💐🙏🙏🙏
Vikram sir. RESPECT.
Agar hme ap jaise teacher and professors mile hote to aj Hamara future bhi kuch aur hota.
Apke jaise teacher and professors har school and college me hone chahiye. Love from me sir.
Humble people with great knowledge.
First time ,I am seeing emerging scholars from other side. Sampath totally slayed the so called left intellectual.
बोहोत है लेकिन कोई सुनता नहीं. thanks lallantop ये लोग ने atleqst बुलाया
So called? Leftists are para site
Brilliant discussion by Vikram Sampath, a different perspective of looking at history, thanks Lallantop for this beautiful debate on these portions of history which has been always under covers
1000% true
Very nice narrated by Vikram Sampath about truth ideology of Veer Savarkar. Salute to him.
वीर सावरकर भी स्वतंत्रता सेनानी था लेकिन भद्दे तरीके से माफी मांगने के बाद माफी वीर भारतीय स्वतंत्रता सेनानी के रूप में अप्रासंगिक हो गए हैं, लेकिन धर्म के नाम पर माफी वीर को वीर बनाया जा रहा है।
@@reviewbyaslam bhai to fir indira gandhi ne unka stsmp q launch kiya ratnagiri maharastra me unka mandir q h?
@@reviewbyaslam rg ne b uncondional sorry kaha tha after chowkidar chor h jibe to iska matlab ye h ki rg modi praiser ban gaye chutne bad?
In my opinion the JNU professor not only exposed himself, but also exposed Communists (SA Dange) & Congress! His anger & hate against current BJP government is clearly visible in face & words! That victorious smile betrays defeat!
No one is happy with the atrocities of the current govt 😒
An average JHOLATARD is a Good for nothingJunk
@@indianjaihind4125 what atrocities ? Atrocity , genocide , fascism , dictatorship are words which have immense meaning. Today you using them & nothing happening to you is itself proof against what you allege the current government for .
@@prayagjoshi1179 what ? Check how many time BJP shut down internet, how many they used article 124 , how many people got caught under UAPA just because of they were speaking against BJP .
@@indianjaihind4125 ...
Come with your real name if you are not librandu or commie
Mr.Dwivedi ,It is expected that at least you will address Mr. SAVARKAR with due respect.
Discussing Savarkar without the burden of agreeing or disagreeing, is definitely a welcome change. History has to be unbiased.
@@ziaqazi41 he must be glorified because he has sacrificed his life for this country. The next generation must know about him and his ideology.
You have done nothing so pls don't comment on him. I think you are from santipriya majahab
@@ziaqazi41 As Vikram told ; history is not about "nation building" but knowing truth.
@@lawplanet2818 bhai tu gumnaam hi reh
@@nsitpoison aur tu mallech hi reh
@@lawplanet2818 yeah I agreed I think we should give respect all the freedom fighters chahe vo mangal pandey ho ya tilak sayad hm sabko hi bhul gye h and iska use kisi party k mtlb k liye n ho BJP congress aayenge jayenge but we want to know truth
Vikram Sampat Ji has highlighted the need and importance of Historiography
Awesome debate! Facts vs fiction! And its always refreshing to hear young scholars like Vikram, make their points in a very lucid and and in an informed way! I am also glad that the right wing scholars have found a place where their voices also can be counted!!
Thank you saurabh dwivedi! You let us hear this wonderful debate without interrupting and trying to be one up! You have the makings of a great anchor.
Vikarm is not a right winger, he is a non-left personality.
@@avengers464 well , even if he is a centrist, atleast one hears that side of the argument, which were denied to us before! So , more power to him!!
India will always indebted by the sacrifices of Veer Savarkar.
Sadar Naman
🙏🙏🙏🙏
विक्रम संपत जी ने आपने मुद्दौं को बहुत शांत, संयमी पद्धत से कहा.
प्रणाम संपत जी 🙏
57:33 JNU के सर्टिफाइड बुद्धिजीवी का रिएक्शन देखकर हंसी रुकने का नाम ही नहीं ले रहा है. 😂😂😃
सत्य को परेशान किया जा सकता है पर पराजित नहीं. Well done Vikram Sir.
Mene bhi dekha 😁😁
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Absolute class.. Proff Mukherjee has not been able to defend himself.
अंधभक्तों से कोई नहीं जीत सकता
Well said
@@CH-ng8ei peaceful
@@CH-ng8ei aur tum landbhakto sai bhi😅😅😅😅
He got stunned at the last moment when Class 7 history book was referred
Inspite of true sincere historian, mr sampat has a great sense of patriotism!!thanks!! Hats off.
With due respect, Aditya is just trying to prove the government wrong instead of focussing on the facts and the agenda on hand.
शौरभ जी इतिहास के दो विद्वानों के साथ इतना हृदय स्पर्शी चर्चा के लिले धन्यवाद 👏
सौरभ जी
@@AmitJain-hf5su वर्तनी सुधार के लिए धन्यवाद 👏आप का
@16:27 That smile on Vikram's face... when you are so sure and honest about your work 😊
Hats off vikram . Joy netaji. Joy revolutionaries ❤❤❤
Its great to listen Vikram sir. We need balance.
Vikram sir just nailed ittt!!!!
वीर सावरकर को नमन 🙏🙏
Being so young Dr, Vikram can be way more sarcastic than the professor yet he choose to be on point, no laughing chuckling about anyone just facts and views of many person, and so polite that itself nailed the debate on the other hand the professor knowledge and points are so weaker that it looks like did he even the right person to debate on this with Dr. Sampath. I read you Vikram and your writings with so many quoted facts gives a very large knowledge base if someone goes by each quoted facts.
This is brilliant debate and the way Vikram Sampath has put forward his 'point of view' with facts and logic is commendable. Very well organised and conducted. Saurabh Dwivedi..more power to you..
It is quite intriguing for me that people like Mr. Mukherjee is a Prof in JNU. He restored to only rhetoric, try to misquote Vikram, and more importantly very close minded for different of opinion. Vikram is just brilliant and crisp and so factual in his presentation.
beacuse of professors like him students of jnu are miaguided and have become antigovt anti indic
Truly agreed brother....and my converation with jnu students....cohort the same mindset as they cannot accept other persons views....how come they are so great
Vikram is giving opinions. Sampath is providing facts.
Looks like planted.
@Abhishek Panigrahi
This should not be intriguing at all. What else do you expect from a JNU prof?
The only criterion to become JNU prof is to peddle leftist agenda and prof Mukherjee is doing what is expected of him.
At one point he mentioned “Discovery of India” as one of the best books on Indian history. That itself is a testimony on his scholarship on Indian history.
Vikram sampat is spot on about the history of Savarkar and Independence movement his learning are insane 👍🙏 salute your research and knowledge.
Nice presentation Vikram Sampat Sir. 🙏
I think every extremists , every liberal citizen must go through this intellectual debate of both the unbiased historian. I have never seen such beautiful conversations on any platform. Vikram bhaiya is my new favourite personality to follow and I will defiantly go through the written works of Prof. Mukherjee as well. Thanks to The Lallantop and Saurabh bhaiya for this episode and last but not the least Nikhil bhai is a good and active listener. Keep going.
Regards
❤️🙏💐🍫
Sorry but one biased and other unbiased
@@arunachalmudgerikar2898 Sir I wrote that "I THINK". may be I am wrong but I think so. There's no need to be sorry. 🙏💐🍫
What he(Savarkar) does after "hook-n-crook" methodology, is yet untold by vikram.
@@KitaalFisabilillah he clearly told that up to 1937 he was like under house arrest condition and after that he formed abhinav bharat
Vikram has stated the truth.
Professor Mukherjee is a biased man .
Prof. Aditya Mukherjee came across as an emotional man with a bias. He should have defended or accepted the "communist leader's" petition letter,, but he chose to ignore it, and give an emotional rhetoric. THIS itself shows that he is selective in his truth . On the other hand, Vikram came across as calm, curious and respectful. Vikram WINS Hands-down.
One is historian, other is history professor in one of the most political college of the nation
@@mandarrane history professor aur historian Abbi isme farak kya hai
@@pratham665 historian will state facts. Professor will bring political angle to cover the fact
Jnu vale pasand is liye nahi hai. Vo mante hum kahe vo sach baki juth. Aur kuch bolte bolte vo has dege jo dekh k hi gussa aata hai. Jab samne vala professionally behave kar rah hai to tum kyu nahi kar rahe. Kuch bi bhonk k chale jate hai ye jnu vale.
It’s opposite Vikram is biased, in fact he is challenging the freedom movement and attempts to demonise Gandhi
By the end the JNU professor was out of quotes and facts and reasoning that he just started to outright say things like I feel sad that you r saying these things even though mr. Sampat had not said those things and in his closing statement he demeans Smapat by implying that he feels like Sampat's "reasoned" argument is based on whatsapp forward...like dude Sampat has only talked about historical references and documents so how does whatsapp forward come into the scene.. so basically the JNU professor was just a sore loser who would rather demean when he doesn't have "Actual" points to counter than just accept that he agrees with what was said by Sampat and he doesn't have anything to add or counter that.
That's the typical commie.. always cry and does personal attacks when faced with facts
👍👍👍👍
हारने पर विक्टिम सा बन कर दिखा रहा है 😂😂 ट्रेडिशनल स्टाइल है इनका
You said it.
They are tool kit Leli jargons, like whatsapp university, whataboutry, , Sanghi etc when they don't have any logical arguments.
Absolutely civilised debate
Thank you
Sampat sir is having point seems to be more correct , hope new generation is not deprived of real history
What a great conversation. Hope to watch more of Vikram Sampath sir.
Vikram ji was flawless. There were always doubts in my mind regarding the episode of Indian history , which I was taught in my school. Vikram ji's explanation really made things very clear.
आज भी पुलिस ने मुखबिर को बहुत स्वतंत्रता दी जाती है उसकी अभिव्यक्ति छुपाने की ऐसा ही अंग्रेजों के शासन काल से चला आ रहा है मतलब इन्होंने अगर माफी मांगी यह देश के वफादार कहां हुए बस माफीनामा ही सत्यता का प्रमाण है
और कितना देश को गांधी जी को बदनाम करोगे
मुझे बताओ देश बांटने का काम किसने किया । डिवाइड एंड रूल पॉलिसी का जनक अगर अंग्रेज नहीं होते । तो उनके बच्चे भाजपा में पैदा कहां से होते । पूछता है भारत वंदे मातरम ।
इतनी ताकत से बोल रहा है भाई मेरा कि गांधी जी ने बोला था । तो मुझे यह बताओ के यह मेरा भाई वही खड़ा था । क्या जब गांधी जी ने बोला था । अगर यह गांधीजी के साथी है । तो इनके नाम हिस्ट्री में क्यों नहीं आते हैं ।
अब जाके सही जा रहा है
Vikram Sampath's Hindi, Kannada, English - wow. Command on each language more than the other. What a man.
@@ziaqazi41 Hey just stop your propaganda 😂
@@ziaqazi41 pls stop frustrated failed leftist pls stop
@@ziaqazi41 How is talking about facts equates to creating hate and division? It is when the lies are caught people are divided. As you said, if the history books didn't lie about Mughals and glorified them, this hatred wouldn't have happened in the long run. Most Muslims today are not the descendants of Mughals, why should they feel bad about it? It's like Christians feeling bad when we slam the British.
@@DHIRAJKUMAR-qo1jm मैं आपको नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस द्वारा लिखित एक किताब का नाम बता रहा हूँ जिसमें सुभाष चन्द्र Bose ने अपने आप को एक Left Winger (अथवा Leftist) बुलाके पुकारा है तथा महात्मा Gandhi [i∙e∙ Mohandaas Karamchand Gaandhii] को Right Winger बुलाकर पुकारा है.
उसी same किताब में Netaajii सुभाष चन्द्र बोस ने विश्लेषित किया है कि क्यूँ {एवं किन कारणों के चलते} गांधी (i·e· मोहनदास करमचन्द गान्धी) के ख़िलाफ़ उनका मतभेद था.
Name of that book is *The Alternative Leadership: Speeches, Articles, Statements and Letters June 1939 － 1941* authored by নেতাজি Subhaash Chandra Bose himself.
@@anonymoushandle007 Which history book (exactly) has glorified the Mughals? Be specific. Name such a book. Tell me it's name.
Really liked the conversation/debate....no tamasha....Vikram Sampath is amazing genuise Historian. He's a epitome of Talented historian.
Last Question asked by anchor about keeping Objectivity & truth...was very important.
Hope to see more debates like this. Very knowledgeable
MY GOD WHAT A DISCUSSIONS. ONE OF THE BEST YET. THANKS TO THE HISTORIANS AND LALLANTOP.
Sampat जी की बाते तर्क sangat है shandar 👌👌🙏🙏
Mafiveer ki pairavi ho gayi? Tum bhi mafi manglena 2022 aur 2024 me kisano ke upar Thar chalene par aur apne anginat gunaho par. Vote mil jayega.🤣🤣
@@nabinbanik6664 😅 epic reply
@@nabinbanik6664 jab wo mafi mange the tab tu wahi tha kya?
@@amanjha7633 Jha ji, Jha ji, mai nahi Aapke mantri ji ne kuch dino pehle kaha.🤣🤣 Mai koun hota hoon savarkar ke bare me jankari rakhne wala. Woh to mantri ji nehi batate to hum unko mafiveer kaise mante 🤣🤣
@@amanjha7633 Jha ji Jha ji, ek aur baat sunkar jaa ji! 🤣 Mafiveer ne maafi hi nahi mangi thi, pension bhi liya tha angrezon se. 🤣🤣
Prof. Mukherjee looks so rattled...Kudos to Vikram Sampath
One who follow republic tv and says prof Mukherjee rattled🤡
Lol
He is an old man n that's how u reacts.
@@pratham665 kuch aur bhi bolne kai liye hai bhi ki nahi😂😂😂😂
baba dhongi hote h aur bhakt gadha hote h? ye h secularism?
India k muslim dekh lo 8cr se 28 cr, aur Bangladesh m hindu dekh lo 28 % se 8% pahonch gaye (1947 census). parivarwad desh ka gaan* mar diya h.
desh ko jihadyon se nahin librandon se khatra h.
@@pratham665 Seems like you don’t watch republic tv and you are also rattled.
Hats off to you Vikram bhai... Love u alot.