Thank you for helping me understand philosophy and have a broader view on books regarding the subject. I always watch your videos before my university lectures and make a world's difference in my education. Your videos are absolutely wonderful, Profesor.
This guy makes awesome videos. I'm trying to chisel my own politics into a finer point and when I read and need more info on a reference my heart lights up when I see this guy has a video on it. Keep up the lord's work!
There are no known portraits of Hooke, and I think that they used Newton in as a bit of bit tongue-in-cheek because Newton allegedly destroyed the only known portrait that existed of Hooke.
@@nexus1g And are images like this upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/17_Robert_Hooke_Engineer.JPG just artistic depictions made after he died?
When the europeans discovered central- and southern africans, they didn't actually believe that they where humans. And that legitimized, in their perception, the treatment of them as livestock. That perception lasted quite for some time before it became questioned. That eventually sparked the questioning even in america which gave rise to abolitionist movement.
Could you please provide quotes from John Locke indicating that he thought toleration should not be extended to Catholics? (I will ask about atheists later.)
"But yet there are two cases or circumstances which may still upon the same grounds vary the magistrate’s usage of the men that claim this right to toleration. 1. Since men usually take up their religion in gross, and assume to themselves the opinions of their party all at once in a bundle, it often happens, that they mix with their religious worship, and speculative opinions, other doctrines absolutely destructive to the society wherein they live, as is evident in the Roman Catholics that are subjects of any prince but the pope. These therefore blending such opinions with their religion, reverencing them as fundamental truths, and submitting to them as articles of their faith, ought not to be tolerated by the magistrate in the exercise of their religion unless he can be secured, that he can allow one part, without the spreading of the other, and that the propagation of these dangerous opinions may be separated from their religious worship, which I suppose is very hard to be done." - An Essay Concerning Toleration 1667 The problem appears to be that Catholics' purported allegiance to the Pope could interfere with the sovereign's authority. The more complicated version of the argument is that while theoretically, it may be possible to tolerate Catholics, the uncivil nature of their views, insofar as they seem to follow the moral "fundamental truths" set out by the Pope, makes them a threat to civil society and an exception to claims to toleration.
@@James_Muldoon It seems that you are quoting from an unpublished work of John Locke where he is working out his views. This seems like a dubious way of arriving at John Locke's views, no? Wouldn't if be fair to say that John Locke seems to have concluded that these earlier views of his were not that tolerant and that he, therefore, decided not to include them in his "Letter"?
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for helping me understand philosophy and have a broader view on books regarding the subject. I always watch your videos before my university lectures and make a world's difference in my education. Your videos are absolutely wonderful, Profesor.
This guy makes awesome videos. I'm trying to chisel my own politics into a finer point and when I read and need more info on a reference my heart lights up when I see this guy has a video on it. Keep up the lord's work!
Thank you for the clarity of the presentation. Subscribed
Thank you very much for these enthusiastic and intelligible videos.
Exam later today. last year of undergrad!! thank you for your videos!!! much appreciated!
bro looks like hes got a trained sniper on him at all times
Great resource, thanks a million.
Expecting more videos from you
i owe my life to this guy, like if he asked me for my firstborn id give it gladly
thank you; youre a life saver
Member of spirit
Thank you so muchhhhh
can you make one on adam smith and his book the wealth of nations
Thank you very much, this helps me so much ☺️
4:11 isn't that Newton?
Actually, your right! lol
There are no known portraits of Hooke, and I think that they used Newton in as a bit of bit tongue-in-cheek because Newton allegedly destroyed the only known portrait that existed of Hooke.
@@nexus1g And are images like this upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/17_Robert_Hooke_Engineer.JPG just artistic depictions made after he died?
I love John Locke.
You constantly look like you're telling a dad joke, and you're trying to not laugh at the punchline you know is coming.
When the europeans discovered central- and southern africans, they didn't actually believe that they where humans. And that legitimized, in their perception, the treatment of them as livestock. That perception lasted quite for some time before it became questioned. That eventually sparked the questioning even in america which gave rise to abolitionist movement.
Could you please provide quotes from John Locke indicating that he thought toleration should not be extended to Catholics? (I will ask about atheists later.)
"But yet there are two cases or circumstances which may still upon the same grounds vary the magistrate’s usage of the men that claim this right to toleration.
1. Since men usually take up their religion in gross, and assume to themselves the opinions of their party all at once in a bundle, it often happens, that they mix with their religious worship, and speculative opinions, other doctrines absolutely destructive to the society wherein they live, as is evident in the Roman Catholics that are subjects of any prince but the pope. These therefore blending such opinions with their religion, reverencing them as fundamental truths, and submitting to them as articles of their faith, ought not to be tolerated by the magistrate in the exercise of their religion unless he can be secured, that he can allow one part, without the spreading of the other, and that the propagation of these dangerous opinions may be separated from their religious worship, which I suppose is very hard to be done." - An Essay Concerning Toleration 1667
The problem appears to be that Catholics' purported allegiance to the Pope could interfere with the sovereign's authority. The more complicated version of the argument is that while theoretically, it may be possible to tolerate Catholics, the uncivil nature of their views, insofar as they seem to follow the moral "fundamental truths" set out by the Pope, makes them a threat to civil society and an exception to claims to toleration.
Are you sure that is a quote from *A letter concerning toleration*?
@@TylerJTube good pick up. It's from "An Essay concerning Toleration". Typo amended.
@@James_Muldoon
It seems that you are quoting from an unpublished work of John Locke where he is working out his views. This seems like a dubious way of arriving at John Locke's views, no? Wouldn't if be fair to say that John Locke seems to have concluded that these earlier views of his were not that tolerant and that he, therefore, decided not to include them in his "Letter"?
Define man.