Check out my written comparison of AirPulse A300 and Klipsch The Sixes here: digitalstereophony.blogspot.com/2019/05/klipsch-sixes-or-airpulse-a300-which.html
Just go Warfedale EVO 4.2 with NAD C 399 vs Air Pulse 300 or some other more expensive Powered Speakers if that is not fair:). I would rly like to compare them(Warfedale EVO 4.2) with any other Power Speakers at 2-3 k euros. That would be a interesting comparison!
they're going to be extremely subject to the youtuber's microphone, how they produce the video, youtube compression, and finally your own audio setup. so these tests aren't always the best.
I like klipsch because that's what I bought, they are high end enough. I didnt do so much research, I saw they were expensive and looked up the specs and decided on them. There is no perfect speaker or sound, there are different tastes in music so enjoy what you like and enjoy it.
Эдики детальнее, факт. Клипсш ярче. Только вот какая штука. В неподготовленное помещение, а таких большинство, клипсш брать крайне нежелательно, у них нет крутилок!.. Вы не сможете подобрать, подкрутить себе звук, так что бы он звучал именно в вашей комнате. Эквалайзер им тоже не помогает!.. Сухой звук на нетронутых крутилках у эдиков, предпочтительней. Вкрутив в них на макс басы и высокие, вы бы не почувствовали разницу в этом тесте. Кроме разве что, чуть более резкого затухания у Клипсш.
You can hear frequencies on the higher end of the A300 that is absent on the Klipsch on the track Deep. Like for those who heard that sound I was referring. It's the advantage of ribbon tweeters projected through that horn projecting horizontally for great sound stage.
The Airpulse sounds nearer the original sound recording. The Klipsch sounds boosted on the lower end w/c sounded not natural but most likely to be liked by most people who wants more bass.
Ясно слышно что середина у клипшей задвинута и в бас преобладает над остальным диапазоном; а300 имеют более сбалансированный открытый звук, и лучшее разрешение, клипш это такой дискотечный домашний вариант без претензии на аудиофилию.
The Sixes killed it here. Better bass and the far better vocals. I'm impressed. The AirPulse had that typical "box speaker" sound (Listening through HiFiMan Sundaras). Need to compare the Sixes with the Edifier S3000 PROs.
@@20puskinas1992 The biggest problem with listening via RUclips, is that the sound varies so much depending on what device you are listening through. Any sound quality conclusions anyone makes are pretty useless with this format. NOTHING replaces having the speakers in front of you. At best, you may get a comparative sense of frequency extension and that's about it.
I have listened to this comparison with my HD800 and Lavry DA11 DAC. To me, Klipsch sounded better: mids are fuller, bass deeper. Overall: Klipsch is a winner in my book. By the way, a pair of AirPulse A300 costs $1,099.99 and pair of the Klipsch The Sixes $599.99 on Amazon.
Great point regarding the pricing on these two speakers! I didn't care for the flatter neutral frequency response of the Airpulse A300's! Not a very engaging or dynamic speaker to excite you when listening to them in the 4 different song tracks! Listening to stereo speakers is a very subjective experience for people with different ideas of what a good or great speaker should sound like!
A300 obviously is not meant for on axis nearfield listening. Trebles 10k+ are very loud. This speaker i believe need big room to make it bearable, but then bass wont be suffiecient, so sub as well. Klipsch are warm retro sound for smaller to midsize rooms, but cant describe it as detailed, it lacks thick vocals or readable trebles of Edifier
Digital Stereophony Good job. Appreciate. What is your personal opinion about these audio systems? Thanks. Another question. Can your test records be available for download?
I got the Airpulse A300 recently. This is the fourth speaker you sold me on lol. For me, they are pretty unbeatable for the price in a mid-field setup. Nearfield, not so much. They need space to really shine. Sound is clean and rich, but overall tone is dark, which is what I prefer. Really great product.
I do have them setup with a couch about 3.25 to 3.5 meters back. The speakers are spaced 2.5 meters away from each other. They sound really great for music. For movies, I'll pick something else.
Other than the Klipschorn I am not usually a fan of Klipsch speakers. However, I'm in the market for a pair of powered bookshelf speakers and I'm really leaning toward The Sixes. Both of these sound really fine but for the money I'm liking the Klipsch speakers. They seem to be tuned a bit warmer than the AirPulses.
After listening to several powered speakers myself, nearly the entire Edifier signature series, both Airpulse a100 and a300 and a couple of 2.1 systems myself i came to the conclusion these comparisons here are of little to no use at all. You can't say anything from them, you need to place them in your room and test your tracks, movies, stand positioning, height, distance, sources, inputs and so on. Only after that you can conclude these stuff like, where they place vocals, forwards, middle, further back, imaging if it's narrow, u-shaped, V-shaped, scalling... and after that you can pick which you found fun the most, discover your tastes and etc. And then, if you move to a bigger house or move the speakers to another room you can discover the entire sound changed, like, from bassy and ethereal to flat and lacking. Depends on the room as well. So, all in all this channel is nice to get to know the options but it is utterly useless to "find the right speaker". i've followed these channels, this and others like Depo196 and such to experience an entirely different thing from what the videos and comments suggested. The right speaker for me ended up much much different from the suggestions. These videos didn't portray anywhere near the end experience i ended up having with the speakers i've chosen. Only buy a speaker from a place that accepts tryouts or returns, you will get very surprised after all.
смазанные низкие частоты - бубны - это у Klipshn, средние срезаны. Ощущение искусственного звучания. Airpulse - хорошо, присутствует эффект живого звука, как буд-то смотришь на выступление - сцены. . Фил Джонс - правильно расставил звук.
@@alexboegilini6135 у меня дома есть A300 и я ими постоянно пользуюсь. Еще в другой комнате есть edifier s3000pro. Есть с чем сравнить. Klipshn - удачно продал... нет надобности - сухие низкие частоты - как бубен, на средних не прослушиваются некоторые звуки - инструменты - они просто срезаны... Это можно увидеть даже по АЧХ. Ленточный рупорный твитер - создает объем звучание, что не может это сделать Klipsch. Послушайте последний трек данного видео - это очевидно. Это как пример. Читайте статью данного блогера, очень хорошо все расписал . Цитирую (Digital Stereophony).
Цитата (перевод): Klipsch-это веселый динамик с большим и смелым звуком, который приятно слушать, не вдаваясь в мелкие детали музыки, в то время как AirPulse является более хирургическим, прозрачным и честным динамиком, который ближе к очень хорошему студийному монитору Tha HiFi speaker. Оба хороши в том, что они делают, поэтому выберите тот, который больше подходит к вашей философии слушания. Для меня AirPulse является здесь главным спикером, потому что я люблю свою музыку честной и верной исходному материалу.
@@benrise4775 No he isn't! They are actually $500 more and not worth it in my opinion either unless you like a flat neutral sounding speaker which lots of people mixing tracks in studios do!
Im hesitating between The Sixes, and Airpulse A200. I prefer the retro look of The Sixes, but Im not sure which of these speakers sounds better. The price in my country is the same for both.
In my opinion, AirPulse sound like more neutral, warm and monitor style with more accents of midrange and clarity, and the Klipsch sound more bright, more bass, just like "let's dance" style. So, it is not about better sound, it is about different styles.
This is silly. You can’t judge a speakers sound quality through a youtube clip. It would be better with just a visual presentatin and a description of how they differ soundwise.
This is hard, but I'd go for Klipsch. It sounds warmer, deeper bass and the most importance It's more relax for my ears than A300, which is great but too much treble to me.
That's incredibly weird, every Klipsch I've ever owned and heard are bright as hell. Like it's dialed up the intensity a bit instead of reproducing the actual highs accurately.
Ah..can not sey which is better....depending of a taste. Maybe in lover volume airplus ...and on higher volumes Klipsch. Listened on Bang & Ol...H4 headphones
Thanks for comparison! Having heard to all fragments of melodies has understood one - that the original sounds much more interesting :(, than that that is reproduced by both these models (interesting on what equipment entry was made? What source of a sound was used? What quality there were musical tracks? There can be problems in it?). And to compare them it is difficult, as against an original track they sound almost equally poorly (the only thing that was pleasant is a voice-frequency balance, though high frequencies are a little lifted) through youtube (can in life play better) with very small advantage of model klipsch
Y love how people say they can hear the suble differences in a video with audio heavily encoded. This cant represent any of the speakers. You need to hear them in person. Any difference you hear is made by the mic, the encoding and your speakers. So its not real
The A300s are definitely 'brighter' than the Klipsch, and thats saying something. It use to be Klipsch that people thought fatiguing with such a high hitting horned tweeter, but the A300 are worse.. and at 2x the cost that is a real deal breaker.
No, the Klipsch don't provide deep bass. They over-pronounce upper bass so they sound bass'ier but they sacrifice details in the low end with this tuning.
A300 is a bit more clinical in bass response, a bit more dry compared to S3000Pro. I do not think you need a subwoofer with A300 tough, at least not for music listening
My impression from the video (and from owning The Sixes) is that the A300 has a little more resolution on the high end. Almost artificially so when compared to the reference track. It sounds little to open and spacious. Meanwhile the The Sixes are a little more harsh in the treble. I think I prefer the sound of the A300, but I think I prefer the sound of the A300 but I wouldn't necessarily say it's better. On the low end The Klipsch sound stronger. Which surprisingly seems to match the reference track. In personal use I've found The Sixes to be a little too boomy in the bass region, but that has a lot to do with placement. The Airpulse might be a little more forgiving in that regard, it's hard to say. As for the mids my impression is that the A300 is a little thin sounding while the Klipsch is a bit hollow. I think the extra bass of The Sixes bleeds into the mids a little giving them a warmer sound (one of things that annoys me about them). I'd prefer the A300 for any sort of mixing. All around though The Sixes held their own way better than I expected. I thought the ribbon tweeter of the Airpulse would blow the titanium dome tweeter in The Sixes out of the water.
@@midniteoyl8913 I haven't replaced them with anything yet. I nearly bought the A300, but after listening to some of the comparison on here decided they probably aren't what I'm looking for either.
@@aimrichman ленточный твитер не может никак звучать в акустике с помощью которой вы слушаете этот обзор. Технически не возможно услышать. Ленточник обгоняет этот рупор с обычной головкой по атаке как стоячего. Все это можно услышать в подготовленной команте но не на ютубе через наушники... к сожалению
@@fannigurt Сам придумал и сам оправдался называется? Где я писал что слушаю через ленточный твитер? Все равно что мне написать что у вас нет ушей на голове, не видя вас
One of my friends bought the Sixes and we made an audition with blackjack and hookers and though they sound pretty decent, there was something in them that I didn't like. Too much bass and lack of mids. Of course may be we should have used eq or something to fix it, but we didn't, so that's it. I prefer acoustic with more air in sound. As for this comparison, I vote for AirPulse.
Klipsch слышно в рок композиции интересней играют. Обычно на многой акустике в рок музыке не хватает низких, а тут всё как надо! У A300 огромный брак с НЧ динамиком, жалоб много. У Klipsch обалденная отделка)
@@user-wg7nv9mt2v отделка у клипшей просто вышак. По звуку судить конечно сложно по записи ютуба. В живую тоже не доводилось слушать ни одни ни другие.
klipsch are good for tv movies etc for their bright crisp clear vocals (my oldman loves them) but VERY bad for monitoring..they are NOT monitors. and for music listening they can be fatiguing...very fatiguing very soon...a calmer flatter speaker is always better to the ears health.
Поддерживаю прозвучавший вопрос о том, на каком оборудовании воспроизводился оригинал трека. Это звучание было наиболее комфортным и широким. Хотя на мой слух клипш звучал приятнее А300, которые долго слушать не очень комфортно. Прошу автора обязательно ответить.Спасибо.
How much more ridiculous could your comparison be considering the Edifer Airpulse A300's sell for $1499 and the Klipsch Sixes sell for $599! Good lord! I wouldn't even consider paying half the actual price of the Airpulse A300's! To each his own on their idea of a great sounding speaker!
Klips have more "life" and yet a warmer sound, probably down to the horn. Could listen to the Klips for longer without fatigue, the highs have much less sibilance but still have detail. However the A300 is more neutral, a good deal less bass more raw and probably less flattering of poorer mastering. Hmmmm the Sixes and the Heritage DAC/Headphone amp could be a very nice combo
Check out my written comparison of AirPulse A300 and Klipsch The Sixes here: digitalstereophony.blogspot.com/2019/05/klipsch-sixes-or-airpulse-a300-which.html
Give music from video
@@hardwarex1663 NEED edifier s3000pro vs Klipsch The Sixes !!!!
Thank you!
Just go Warfedale EVO 4.2 with NAD C 399 vs Air Pulse 300 or some other more expensive Powered Speakers if that is not fair:). I would rly like to compare them(Warfedale EVO 4.2) with any other Power Speakers at 2-3 k euros. That would be a interesting comparison!
The first channel on You Tube with real sound comparisons of speakers. I like it.
they're going to be extremely subject to the youtuber's microphone, how they produce the video, youtube compression, and finally your own audio setup. so these tests aren't always the best.
@@neby_nebs you shouldnt be on these vids then.
@@neby_nebs that’s why ppl seek reference equipment mate
I like klipsch because that's what I bought, they are high end enough. I didnt do so much research, I saw they were expensive and looked up the specs and decided on them. There is no perfect speaker or sound, there are different tastes in music so enjoy what you like and enjoy it.
Klipsch the sixes are better than the nines!
Great work! It would be fantastic if you can pit the Sixes to the new S3000pro from Edifier. Similar market and price. !
Эдики детальнее, факт. Клипсш ярче. Только вот какая штука. В неподготовленное помещение, а таких большинство, клипсш брать крайне нежелательно, у них нет крутилок!.. Вы не сможете подобрать, подкрутить себе звук, так что бы он звучал именно в вашей комнате. Эквалайзер им тоже не помогает!.. Сухой звук на нетронутых крутилках у эдиков, предпочтительней. Вкрутив в них на макс басы и высокие, вы бы не почувствовали разницу в этом тесте. Кроме разве что, чуть более резкого затухания у Клипсш.
would love to see the klipsch sixes vs airpulse A100, probably the two best speakers on the channel so far imo
no comparison, A100 is much better
@@wimax802 why, aren’t the a300s better than the a100s?
I love this oldschool design of the Klipsch ones, but the Edifier sounds better in my opinion.
Думаю Klipsch не просто так сделали перегруженными по басу. На широкую аудиторию, чтоб большинству зашла. Людям далеким от качественного звука.
You can hear frequencies on the higher end of the A300 that is absent on the Klipsch on the track Deep. Like for those who heard that sound I was referring. It's the advantage of ribbon tweeters projected through that horn projecting horizontally for great sound stage.
My goodness but those Airpulse are just so clean you can almost ping 'em with a finger.
With the "Deep" track the Klipsch sounds uncontrolled and all over the place. Very big difference with the AirPulse.
The Airpulse sounds nearer the original sound recording. The Klipsch sounds boosted on the lower end w/c sounded not natural but most likely to be liked by most people who wants more bass.
Ясно слышно что середина у клипшей задвинута и в бас преобладает над остальным диапазоном; а300 имеют более сбалансированный открытый звук, и лучшее разрешение, клипш это такой дискотечный домашний вариант без претензии на аудиофилию.
The Sixes killed it here. Better bass and the far better vocals. I'm impressed. The AirPulse had that typical "box speaker" sound (Listening through HiFiMan Sundaras). Need to compare the Sixes with the Edifier S3000 PROs.
ruclips.net/video/LM0dxPj127o/видео.html
More \louder bass does not mean better bass.
@@rdolle990 I agree. I just said “better”, not “more” or “louder”
Sixes sound low fi. cant hear anything special.
@@20puskinas1992 The biggest problem with listening via RUclips, is that the sound varies so much depending on what device you are listening through. Any sound quality conclusions anyone makes are pretty useless with this format. NOTHING replaces having the speakers in front of you. At best, you may get a comparative sense of frequency extension and that's about it.
Both are great and at top of the line. The sixes sound more dynamic while A300 is clean/clear. A300 offers brightsound and more like Adam
They both are great it’d be great to find a speaker that kind of encompass the quality of both
Superb comparison, I may not agree with some of the opinions but appreciate the recording effort!
Only difference i hear that a Klipsch vocal not so clean as Airpulse and Klipsch have more bass, low frequency. Good comparsion.
yes, but AirPulse sounds closer to the source than Klipsch.
More uncontrolled bass that's all over the place...
Hello,
A300 or A200? What is your opinion?
I have listened to this comparison with my HD800 and Lavry DA11 DAC. To me, Klipsch sounded better: mids are fuller, bass deeper.
Overall: Klipsch is a winner in my book. By the way, a pair of AirPulse A300 costs $1,099.99 and pair of the Klipsch The Sixes $599.99 on Amazon.
Great point regarding the pricing on these two speakers! I didn't care for the flatter neutral frequency response of the Airpulse A300's! Not a very engaging or dynamic speaker to excite you when listening to them in the 4 different song tracks! Listening to stereo speakers is a very subjective experience for people with different ideas of what a good or great speaker should sound like!
Yep but A300 look better :))
I have Klipsch! Awesome Sound!Awesome design!
did you compared your Sixes with other speakers?
Airpulse giving more details although the bass was a bit weak,but klipsch feels a bit muffled on mid tone.
A300 obviously is not meant for on axis nearfield listening. Trebles 10k+ are very loud. This speaker i believe need big room to make it bearable, but then bass wont be suffiecient, so sub as well. Klipsch are warm retro sound for smaller to midsize rooms, but cant describe it as detailed, it lacks thick vocals or readable trebles of Edifier
Digital Stereophony
Good job. Appreciate. What is your personal opinion about these audio systems? Thanks. Another question. Can your test records be available for download?
I'm so exited to get my sixes. They sound awesome. They're pricey but you get the quality.
I got the Airpulse A300 recently. This is the fourth speaker you sold me on lol. For me, they are pretty unbeatable for the price in a mid-field setup. Nearfield, not so much. They need space to really shine. Sound is clean and rich, but overall tone is dark, which is what I prefer. Really great product.
Nice :D
how do you think these would go in a livingroom/TV setup, maybe 2-3m from a sofa?
I do have them setup with a couch about 3.25 to 3.5 meters back. The speakers are spaced 2.5 meters away from each other. They sound really great for music. For movies, I'll pick something else.
I have both and Airpulse 300 is the far better speaker..
Other than the Klipschorn I am not usually a fan of Klipsch speakers. However, I'm in the market for a pair of powered bookshelf speakers and I'm really leaning toward The Sixes. Both of these sound really fine but for the money I'm liking the Klipsch speakers. They seem to be tuned a bit warmer than the AirPulses.
Klipsh = warm and natural and details
A300 = much clear and balance sound
Close call guys = I choose Klipsh, I like the design more 😁
Agreed
After listening to several powered speakers myself, nearly the entire Edifier signature series, both Airpulse a100 and a300 and a couple of 2.1 systems myself i came to the conclusion these comparisons here are of little to no use at all. You can't say anything from them, you need to place them in your room and test your tracks, movies, stand positioning, height, distance, sources, inputs and so on. Only after that you can conclude these stuff like, where they place vocals, forwards, middle, further back, imaging if it's narrow, u-shaped, V-shaped, scalling... and after that you can pick which you found fun the most, discover your tastes and etc. And then, if you move to a bigger house or move the speakers to another room you can discover the entire sound changed, like, from bassy and ethereal to flat and lacking. Depends on the room as well. So, all in all this channel is nice to get to know the options but it is utterly useless to "find the right speaker". i've followed these channels, this and others like Depo196 and such to experience an entirely different thing from what the videos and comments suggested. The right speaker for me ended up much much different from the suggestions. These videos didn't portray anywhere near the end experience i ended up having with the speakers i've chosen. Only buy a speaker from a place that accepts tryouts or returns, you will get very surprised after all.
смазанные низкие частоты - бубны - это у Klipshn, средние срезаны. Ощущение искусственного звучания. Airpulse - хорошо, присутствует эффект живого звука, как буд-то смотришь на выступление - сцены. . Фил Джонс - правильно расставил звук.
А вы вживую слушали А300 ?)
@@alexboegilini6135 у меня дома есть A300 и я ими постоянно пользуюсь. Еще в другой комнате есть edifier s3000pro. Есть с чем сравнить. Klipshn - удачно продал... нет надобности - сухие низкие частоты - как бубен, на средних не прослушиваются некоторые звуки - инструменты - они просто срезаны... Это можно увидеть даже по АЧХ. Ленточный рупорный твитер - создает объем звучание, что не может это сделать Klipsch. Послушайте последний трек данного видео - это очевидно. Это как пример. Читайте статью данного блогера, очень хорошо все расписал . Цитирую (Digital Stereophony).
Цитата (перевод): Klipsch-это веселый динамик с большим и смелым звуком, который приятно слушать, не вдаваясь в мелкие детали музыки, в то время как AirPulse является более хирургическим, прозрачным и честным динамиком, который ближе к очень хорошему студийному монитору Tha HiFi speaker. Оба хороши в том, что они делают, поэтому выберите тот, который больше подходит к вашей философии слушания. Для меня AirPulse является здесь главным спикером, потому что я люблю свою музыку честной и верной исходному материалу.
@@dimadomen6790 а если сравнить допустим например с пассивными напольниками JBL 180 , не сильно они лучше будут чем А300 ?
@@dimadomen6790 а Рамштайн на А300 круто будет звучать?)
The AirPulse doesn't sound $400 better than the Klipsch... 😉 Thanks for the comparison.
U wrong :)
@@benrise4775 No he isn't! They are actually $500 more and not worth it in my opinion either unless you like a flat neutral sounding speaker which lots of people mixing tracks in studios do!
Leave a link to download the original recording from the microphone to compare the speakers.
The klipsch now on Amazon United States costs $ 499. Great price. Run for it 🙈🙊🙉
Im hesitating between The Sixes, and Airpulse A200.
I prefer the retro look of The Sixes, but Im not sure which of these speakers sounds better.
The price in my country is the same for both.
Hi do u maybe know a store in EU where is possible to order them but that it ships to all eu countries? Thx
In my opinion, AirPulse sound like more neutral, warm and monitor style with more accents of midrange and clarity, and the Klipsch sound more bright, more bass, just like "let's dance" style. So, it is not about better sound, it is about different styles.
Klipsch is an absolute winner. A300 are honest, like monitors, but The Sixes are beautiful, like a dream!
Los mejores videos!!
Ojalá hicieran comprarciones de Klipsch the nines vs Airpulse A300
Слушал на а300 и edifier s3000 pro клипч побасистее но а 300 красивее играют
Lol at the people hyping the a300s the fives walked away from them at 40% of the MSRP.
Air pulse is more clear sound and natural, klipsch seems a little warm and alterated sound, not so natural, i'd go for airpulse if i had to choose!
how can one judge a speaker being played then recorded via X then played out of a different Y speaker?.....
This is silly. You can’t judge a speakers sound quality through a youtube clip. It would be better with just a visual presentatin and a description of how they differ soundwise.
This is hard, but I'd go for Klipsch. It sounds warmer, deeper bass and the most importance It's more relax for my ears than A300, which is great but too much treble to me.
That's incredibly weird, every Klipsch I've ever owned and heard are bright as hell. Like it's dialed up the intensity a bit instead of reproducing the actual highs accurately.
Klipsch is more cheap than Edifier and has a good sound quality. For me Klipsch is better
*cheaper than
it's the opposite in my country.. im sad now
@@adriannasyraf3534, і в моїй також)
cheaper than edifier, are you drunk?
@@SSchithFoo *douchier than
Hi! Which speaker on the market is the best for jazz and this kind of music?
Airpulse has a little more clear highs and Sixes more warm sound and bass.
Klipsch has more solid bass and natural high, middle is more open.
Klipsch sounds better for me.
Klipsch👍
Airpulse is incredible
Ah..can not sey which is better....depending of a taste.
Maybe in lover volume airplus ...and on higher volumes Klipsch.
Listened on Bang & Ol...H4 headphones
which was the treble bass setting on the back off a300? thank you!
Thanks for comparison! Having heard to all fragments of melodies has understood one - that the original sounds much more interesting :(, than that that is reproduced by both these models (interesting on what equipment entry was made? What source of a sound was used? What quality there were musical tracks? There can be problems in it?). And to compare them it is difficult, as against an original track they sound almost equally poorly (the only thing that was pleasant is a voice-frequency balance, though high frequencies are a little lifted) through youtube (can in life play better) with very small advantage of model klipsch
Author your choice ls50w II or Airpulse a300 pro?
As duas são muito boas.
Pra mim praticamente um EMPATE 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻✅✅
If the microphones were positioned the same, it would seem the klipsch have a broader imaging.
Y love how people say they can hear the suble differences in a video with audio heavily encoded. This cant represent any of the speakers. You need to hear them in person. Any difference you hear is made by the mic, the encoding and your speakers. So its not real
Its for side by side comparison
The A300s are definitely 'brighter' than the Klipsch, and thats saying something. It use to be Klipsch that people thought fatiguing with such a high hitting horned tweeter, but the A300 are worse.. and at 2x the cost that is a real deal breaker.
Don't confuse better with more clarity. Klipsch's high frequencies have almost no detail yet still emphasized
Klipsch replays the deep base that is the Edifier can't do
S3000 Pro is superior fo the Sixes in every way. Air pulse A300 was not the right comparison. It’s more clarity than just bass.
No, the Klipsch don't provide deep bass. They over-pronounce upper bass so they sound bass'ier but they sacrifice details in the low end with this tuning.
@@morespinach9832 Please tell me more about the Edifier S3000 Pro.
Does a300 preform like s3000? Punchy bass? Or its better to add a sub for a300?
A300 is a bit more clinical in bass response, a bit more dry compared to S3000Pro. I do not think you need a subwoofer with A300 tough, at least not for music listening
@@DSAUDIOreview if you have to choose a300 or s3000?
Great timing! I was just thinking about replacing my set of The Sixes with the A300. Do you have any thoughts on which is better?
My impression from the video (and from owning The Sixes) is that the A300 has a little more resolution on the high end. Almost artificially so when compared to the reference track. It sounds little to open and spacious. Meanwhile the The Sixes are a little more harsh in the treble. I think I prefer the sound of the A300, but I think I prefer the sound of the A300 but I wouldn't necessarily say it's better. On the low end The Klipsch sound stronger. Which surprisingly seems to match the reference track. In personal use I've found The Sixes to be a little too boomy in the bass region, but that has a lot to do with placement. The Airpulse might be a little more forgiving in that regard, it's hard to say. As for the mids my impression is that the A300 is a little thin sounding while the Klipsch is a bit hollow. I think the extra bass of The Sixes bleeds into the mids a little giving them a warmer sound (one of things that annoys me about them). I'd prefer the A300 for any sort of mixing. All around though The Sixes held their own way better than I expected. I thought the ribbon tweeter of the Airpulse would blow the titanium dome tweeter in The Sixes out of the water.
@@ChristopherAKAO4 - Are you selling your Klipsch?
@@midniteoyl8913 I haven't replaced them with anything yet. I nearly bought the A300, but after listening to some of the comparison on here decided they probably aren't what I'm looking for either.
@@ChristopherAKAO4 - Good choice :)
@@ChristopherAKAO4 Hi do u maybe know a store in EU where is possible to order them but that it ships to all eu countries? Thx
Excellent!. Both are excellent with very few differences. Slightly more bass from the Klipsch but both would be welcomes in my home for sure.
Klipsch звук мне больше по кайфу, но и AirPulse A300 хорош...
AirPulse недотягивают
@@aimrichman ленточный твитер не может никак звучать в акустике с помощью которой вы слушаете этот обзор. Технически не возможно услышать. Ленточник обгоняет этот рупор с обычной головкой по атаке как стоячего. Все это можно услышать в подготовленной команте но не на ютубе через наушники... к сожалению
@@fannigurt Сам придумал и сам оправдался называется? Где я писал что слушаю через ленточный твитер? Все равно что мне написать что у вас нет ушей на голове, не видя вас
One of my friends bought the Sixes and we made an audition with blackjack and hookers and though they sound pretty decent, there was something in them that I didn't like. Too much bass and lack of mids. Of course may be we should have used eq or something to fix it, but we didn't, so that's it. I prefer acoustic with more air in sound. As for this comparison, I vote for AirPulse.
Klipsch sounds closer to the source.
owww check your ears mate
@@endrizo my ears are fine, so check yours.
You are deaf
Одни играют натуральнее, другие приятнее слушать, ну что за...фиг выберешь.
Klipsch слышно в рок композиции интересней играют. Обычно на многой акустике в рок музыке не хватает низких, а тут всё как надо!
У A300 огромный брак с НЧ динамиком, жалоб много. У Klipsch обалденная отделка)
@@user-wg7nv9mt2v отделка у клипшей просто вышак.
По звуку судить конечно сложно по записи ютуба. В живую тоже не доводилось слушать ни одни ни другие.
Careless Angel Мне лично так и не довелось Klipsch послушать, но два знакомых кто их слушал сказали, что звук не соответствует их внешности!
Обе модели хороши, у Клипш более детально проработан звук и более выразительный басс но и более выразительная цена, спасибо за классный видос!
Клипхш дешевле
Airpulse: thim sound
Klipsch: almost same sound signature just balanced with the bass
klipsch are good for tv movies etc for their bright crisp clear vocals (my oldman loves them) but VERY bad for monitoring..they are NOT monitors. and for music listening they can be fatiguing...very fatiguing very soon...a calmer flatter speaker is always better to the ears health.
Airpulse A300 sounds better surely
how about comparing them with Swans m300
Air pulse is better for jazz and classic music. I would ad a acoustic studio subwoofer to it
Who wins? Who has louder sound?
Tell me to Klipsch 15PM what sbuffer better to take the Subwoofer R-10SW or Subwoofer R-12SW?
R12SW
With the song heart afire the air pulse have a shrill harshness at high volume listen then you will hear the sixes are just better
Neither of these sounds close to the source tracks, but the Klipsch sounds better IMO.
klipsch best..
Could someone share link to Man On Fire song please?
Heres his whole testing playlist.. ruclips.net/p/PLvAQtW1hCnr-13tqb-3x6Z3GYGzAV5rKd
sounds like A300 got a lot bass problem need to fix...try A300 pro nexxtime
Поддерживаю прозвучавший вопрос о том, на каком оборудовании воспроизводился оригинал трека. Это звучание было наиболее комфортным и широким. Хотя на мой слух клипш звучал приятнее А300, которые долго слушать не очень комфортно. Прошу автора обязательно ответить.Спасибо.
Оригинал вообще не проигрывался =) Его просто импортировали как файл и сравнили с записями с инструментальных микрофонов
Listened to Klipsch sixes in the store. Open sound but not enough clarity. the bass is booming and not deep. Not like.
How much more ridiculous could your comparison be considering the Edifer Airpulse A300's sell for $1499 and the Klipsch Sixes sell for $599! Good lord! I wouldn't even consider paying half the actual price of the Airpulse A300's! To each his own on their idea of a great sounding speaker!
Thank a lot 🎉🙏🏼
i prefer the source track ... seriously they sound more similar than different to me. I like both. Great comparison ! i am subscribing Bye gino
Klipsch The Sixes -КЛАСС.
the sixes vs a100?
Klipsch!
A 300 cool
Klips have more "life" and yet a warmer sound, probably down to the horn. Could listen to the Klips for longer without fatigue, the highs have much less sibilance but still have detail. However the A300 is more neutral, a good deal less bass more raw and probably less flattering of poorer mastering. Hmmmm the Sixes and the Heritage DAC/Headphone amp could be a very nice combo
Hi do u maybe know a store in EU where is possible to order them but that it ships to all eu countries? Thx
Klipsch are more balanced and bring the songs alive
AirPulse A300👍
Edifier gooooood
Klipsch The Sixes won
In china airpulse a300 cost you 600 us $
+1 for Klipsch
S3000pro
Sixes - The Hiss Masters
Klipsch sound better
А300
Klipsch
a300 sounds better. Less bass but highs are definitely clearer, which is the most important thing.
A300
Hi do u maybe know a store in EU where is possible to order them but that it ships to all eu countries? Thx