Love how they call it "clean energy"but we have to store the carbon under you rather than over you or whatever.polutiion is pollution no matter where it's stored.want clean energy just build my contraption that uses a magnifying glass to heat water on a larger scale and make steam to turn a turbine on sunny days anyway.not that complicated really.but whatever you do don't call it clean energy that just makes it dirty on another level.fact is they have no clue what the effects of storing the pollution under ground will be on the environment, it just happens to be something that sounds good and the government is handing out money for right now.look at the disaster that bayou corne turned into.these people have no idea what they're doing and Louisiana will be their guinea pig.agaun.for a dollar.
Considering the natural gas came from under the ground to begin with it doesn't seem like such a terrible trade off. They also didn't call it clean energy. They narrator specifically said it was a trade off to lower carbon output in the near term until green/renewable energy capacity is high enough (and more efficient catalysts exist) to produce it all from water using electricity. Or perhaps they can just cut out the hydrogen fuel middle man entirely with some future laser/saser hybrid device for high intensity thermal phonon radiation.
Super explanation madam
Great
Blue hydrogen is a pragmatic solution, but it's work
poor efficiencies - 14g of Hydrogen produced 44g of CO2 during blue hydrogen production
Love how they call it "clean energy"but we have to store the carbon under you rather than over you or whatever.polutiion is pollution no matter where it's stored.want clean energy just build my contraption that uses a magnifying glass to heat water on a larger scale and make steam to turn a turbine on sunny days anyway.not that complicated really.but whatever you do don't call it clean energy that just makes it dirty on another level.fact is they have no clue what the effects of storing the pollution under ground will be on the environment, it just happens to be something that sounds good and the government is handing out money for right now.look at the disaster that bayou corne turned into.these people have no idea what they're doing and Louisiana will be their guinea pig.agaun.for a dollar.
Considering the natural gas came from under the ground to begin with it doesn't seem like such a terrible trade off.
They also didn't call it clean energy.
They narrator specifically said it was a trade off to lower carbon output in the near term until green/renewable energy capacity is high enough (and more efficient catalysts exist) to produce it all from water using electricity.
Or perhaps they can just cut out the hydrogen fuel middle man entirely with some future laser/saser hybrid device for high intensity thermal phonon radiation.