At last Riemann Hypothesis is proved
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 дек 2023
- Link: www.academia.edu/122384584/Nu...
riemann hypothesis
riemann zeta function
did you know
fermat's last theorem
imaginary numbers
riemann
complex numbers engineering mathematics
numerische integration
zeta function
analytic number theory
bernhard riemann
calculus and analytic geometry
collatz conjecture
complex analysis engineering mathematics
complex numbers
computational finance
critical value hypothesis testing
fast fourier transform
fermat's last theorem proof
formula de euler
functions of logistics management
hypothesis in research
indian mathematics
jacques vallee
mathematics
physics
plugged
prime numbers
real numbers and imaginary numbers
riemann hypothesis explained
riemann hypothesis proof
simplex
simplex method in operation research
testing of hypothesis engineering mathematics
theoretical framework in research Did you know
didyouknow
did you know
did you know channel
did you know daily
did you know it
#didyouknow #didyouknowfacts Link: www.academia.edu/114228221/NU...
#riemanhypothesis #riemannhypothesis #riemannhypothesisexplained #riemannhypothesissolved #riemannhypothesisproof #riemannhypothesisnumberphile #riemannhypothesisprimenumbers #riemannhypothesisveritasium #riemannhypothesisquora #riemannhypothesisinhindi #riemannhypothesislecture #riemannhypothesisterencetao #riemannhypothesissolution #riemannhypothesismathologer #riemannhypothesisproofattempts #riemannhypothesisanalyticcontinuation #riemanhypothesisand #riemannhypothesisandprimenumbers #riemannhypothesisandquantummechanics #riemannhypothesisandprimes #riemannhypothesisscienceandmyths #riemannzetafunctionandprimes #riemannhypothesisof1859
#zetazeros #zetafunctionzeros #riemannzetazeros #zetazero0.5 #zetazero0.5zillakami #zetazero0.5instrumental #zetazero0.5reaction #zetazeroslowed #zetazeroalphadisperatoamore #zetazerodarkbeach(slowed+reverb) #zetazeroorbital
#zetazerosand #zetazerosandprimenumbers
Dear Science Community,
I am pleased to present my proof of the Riemann Hypothesis. After 10 years of research and experimentation, I have successfully demonstrated that the Riemann Hypothesis is true. My proof is based on harmonic conjugate of zeta function and its functional equation.
The Riemann hypothesis has been proven in three different ways, each with varying levels of complexity. One approach involves utilizing the functional equation and introducing the concept of the Delta function and the periodic harmonic conjugate of the Gamma and Delta functions, similar to the Gamma and Pi functions. The other two proofs are derived using Euler's formula and elementary algebra. By analytically continuing the zeta function to an extended domain, the poles and zeros of zeta values are redefined. Furthermore, other prime conjectures such as the Goldbach conjecture and the Twin prime conjecture have been proven based on a new understanding of primes and numbers as three-dimensional entities, as elucidated by Hamilton's four-dimensional quaternions. The imaginary number iota is defined as the natural logarithm of two, and the logarithm of negative and complex numbers is redefined using an extended number system. Additionally, the factorial of negative and complex numbers is redefined through the use of the Delta function and the periodic harmonic conjugate of the Gamma and Delta functions.
The Riemann Hypothesis is one of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics. Its proof has eluded mathematicians for over a century. My proof not only solves this problem but also opens up new avenues of research in the field of mathematics.
The implications of my proof are far-reaching. It has the potential to revolutionize the way we think about prime numbers and their distribution in the number line. It could also have applications in other fields such as physics, computer science, and engineering.
I am sharing my proof with the science community in the hope that it will inspire others to build on my work and advance the field of mathematics. I am not seeking any monetary compensation for my work. My only goal is to contribute to the advancement of humankind.
Thank you for your attention.
Big congrats on cracking the Riemann Hypothesis! Your approach with the zeta function is pretty cool. The impact on prime numbers and other fields is exciting stuff. Good luck sharing your work! Throw in some hashtags for more visibility. Your passion for advancing knowledge without asking for cash is awesome. Nice one, and good luck ahead
Thanks for the tips!
cracking? There are obvious math errors so to say that someone cheated to "crack" the Riemann hypothesis would be an understatement
@@ambasing_omaygot You can help by pointing out the errors, and a lot of people will appreciate your expert opinion.
Just to prevent people being misled by this video. This isn't a proof. Apart from the many many red flags, such as talking about dozens of famous problems, citing wikipedia and youtube, not even attempting a peer review process and many others, there are obvious factual errors here.
The most important one is that the problem is impossible to even formulate without extending the domain of the series in question, because the critical strip (which is what the entire problem is about) is completely outside the region where this series converges. Not converging here means that the series doesn't define any value of the zeta-function for these inputs. Therefore, you need to use an extension method (such as through the Gamma function) to formulate the problem of zeroes in critical strip. No amount of "I visualized the problem" could possibly replace this.
Secondly, an easy thing for everyone to check is at 9:48 where is says "zeta(1)=1", which is just a blatantly nonsensical claim, as 1 is a pole of order 1 of the zeta function. This means that zeta(1) is not defined and you can't possibly define it, as a complex number, as that would imply that the order of the pole is 0. Just putting zeta(1) in e.g. Wolfram-Alpha or checking the wikipedia article will confirm that.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particular_values_of_the_Riemann_zeta_function
can you please explain that?
Just saying it's impossible and doing nothing to show that I am possible is the safest escape from the problem. Yes I have extended it further with both Gamma and my own delta function, and once I felt I have completed the circle then I changed the sign of integration also to restore the zero state. Please don't show off your conventional knowledge. I will definitely debate if you say that another variant of zeta function which works with Riemann zeta function to produce zeros at critical line is not allowed. That actually happens due to algebraic cycles.
@kekw8105 sure, zeta -1 is responsible for six quarks filed and and six lepton fields, zeta -3 is responsible for the disagreement between quantum vaccum energy and observed energy density of empty space and so on... As the experimental science keeps on bringing the points of difference.
@@kekw8105what exactly do you want to be explained?
Wanna bet Riemann has not been solved!?
exactly
Yes officially it's unsolved. Mathemeticians need to grow up little bit like the physicists have learned to live with quantum duality, they should also bring duality in maths then RH will be a piece of cake. If we expect a proof out of original zeta and gamma function alone, it will be same asking male species to produce babies which may not be possible unless we juxtapose the male/female terms in our dictionary. It's very unlikely that I have got the wrong pulse, the world can continue the search, I claim that, once the final proof is achieved and declared by clay institute, that proof has shall be equivalent of mine in terms of predictions.
@@rhsolvedI'm confused. Is this video a valid RH proof?
You can download it from the link in the description and clear your confusion.
@@rhsolved You might be projecting. I am not confused.
I stumbled upon your video on RUclips, and I am interested in mathematics. I am currently in 8th grade and learning real analysis from Rudin. I want to become a mathematician one day, and I would love your advice on learning more.
I got my grip over number system attempting to understand the reasons, why nature is fond of some special numbers, why some numbers shows up every where again and again. If you really want my advice then I would suggest skim the creamy layers first otherwise it will soon become boring and you may loose interest. You can start with the clock numbers, can you speak about the clock numbers for an hour each?
Please don't take advice from someone that posts nonsense on the internet, such as this video. Ask your math teachers, if you can build up connections to a university/professors (likely only possible when older). A good resource for learning are university scripts you can find online for free and exercise sheets. Doing exercises is very important and making sure that your proofs are tight. Even if you are sure that your proof works out, it can easily happen that when you write it down, you'll discover gaps you have to fix.
I agree with you completely, but imitating the same thing, copy pasting doesn't solve the problem. I will suggest everybody to have the courage to think beyond the horizon and feel free to express your ideas howsoever radical it may sound.
I'd advice you prepare for ISI, IISc, IISERs
good for you bhai. lets hope this goes viral
Thank you Bhai.
Fantastic work, i hope you are successful in drawing attention to it.
Thank you so much 😀
Bro.. why are you talking about climate change and astronomical data in a mathematics paper? LOL
Because it's all connected and mathematicians do not have imagination beyond imaginary number, and physicists have no control over their imagination as they theorise everything driven by standard illusion. We the middle dimension population suffer as lot's of public money are spent without any direction or in a totally wrong direction. Hope you got your answer, please don't take anything personally.
darun kaj. submit korun review er jonno kono journal e
Trying.
Havw you tried to submit this to officials?
Trying.
Proved isnt a word
Okay. Noted .
@@rhsolved WHAT
proven must be past perfect tense ig
smh i cant say i soeak english ;-; im obly conversational
i apologise, proved is a word
It's okay.
@@rhsolved
"Proved" is used in a sentence when "x proved y".
An example of a reworked title structure with "proved" would be "At last, the Riemann Hypothesis has proved to be true"
Another would be "At last, [I have] proved the Reimann Hypothesis"
An example without "proved" would be "At last, the Reimann Hypothesis has been proven"
Hope this helps
Wtf is this?
This is FTW, Fine tuned world 🌍