Cross Examination - Leading Questions
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
- This video focuses on the skill of cross examination in a criminal trial and specifically, the importance of asking leading questions. The techniques demonstrated also apply to cross examination in civil trials. Please note that there are limited circumstances where non-leading questions will be applicable. We will explore the circumstances in a later video.
Timestamps:
00:00 - Intro
00:34 - What is a leading question
00:52 - How to get the witness to say 'yes' or 'no'
01.15 - Demonstration of how NOT to cross examine a witness
02.20 - Analysis of what went wrong
03:11 - Consequences of not asking leading questions
03:45 - Demonstration of how to ask leading questions
📚 Important Information: Please note, any resemblance to any person in this video is entirely coincidental. The characters are not based on any individual person.
Thank you for watching! Please hit the 'like' button and consider subscribing if you like my channel. I post new videos every 2 weeks! Please see below for more resources:
GET MY FREEBIE HERE:
Case analysis toolkit - www.advocacytutor.com/case-an...
SHOP MY ONLINE COURSE:
How to Cross-Examine Effectively and Strategically - www.advocacytutor.com/course-...
VISIT MY WEBSITE:
The Advocacy Tutor - www.advocacytutor.com/
#crossexamination #leading questions #Jury trial #AdvocacyTutorial #AdvocacyTraining #OralAdvocacy #questioningskills
Objection: Leading
Sustained!!!
Grounds?
On point, helpful, totally impressive!!! A lot of thought went into the presentation of this series. I thank you Advocacy Tutor.
Thank you so much for your feedback Esther. More videos to come.
Thank you for producing this wonderful clip.
You are more than welcome.
Excellent. Hope to see more videos on court's procedure.
Thank you Amir. Yes, more to come.
more please, i love these
Thank you for your comment. I will definitely posting more videos.
Great explanation!
Glad it was helpful Davi.
Thanks, want more of this😊
More to come!
Very impressive indeed
Thank you Yogesh
Very nice ..thanks
Thank you.
It is the outburst of the Defence Counsel at end of the Cross-Examination for me. 😂
Excellent video!
Yes, she was crushed 😂😂. Thank's for your comment.
5:15: Phrased as statements rather than questions
I love your voice 😊and great video
❤️❤️
very helpful.
Glad it was helpful!
@@advocacytutor6354 plz hindi m kijiye
Love animation
Thank you Mili Mat.
I like this
Thanks Cynthia, I'm glad you found the video useful.
Needed this for the amber heard trial 😂
👍👍👍
I think we all did
@@madisonthompson8325 Thank you so much.
Good
Nice
Thank you
👍🏽
Thank you Shakur Capital.
nice
Glad you like it.
Nice video and very imformative, but I don't really think the music matches the mood. Other than that, this video is great.
Thank you for the constructive feedback and for taking the time to comment. Much appreciated.
Isn’t a leading question used only in direct examination?
Leading questions should not be asked in direct examination, (except in limited circumstances). If you've been watching the Depp v Heard trial you will have seen Camille Vasquez's objections to the leading questions asked by Amber Heard's counsel.
Would you be so kind to clarify - if it is it important to ask leading questions why are they objected then?
Lawyers object to questions in cross examination not because they are formulated as leading questions, but for other reasons such as lack of relevance, lack of foundation, the questions are compound (more than one fact/question at once), or the witness has already answered the question.
@@advocacytutor6354 But what about when the lawyer says: "Objection:leading"? According to the webpage - dictionary law com such an objection means: "Leading is improper if the attorney is questioning a witness called by that attorney and presumably friendly to the attorney's side of the case."
@@TheThelenita Correct. In examination in chief (direct examination) leading questions are not permissible, except in limited circumstances. I have a video that explains this in detail: ruclips.net/video/N34DzMMWIZU/видео.html
@@advocacytutor6354 Thank you very much for clarifying.
What if any leading questions can be asked ?
👏👏👏👏
College students are here
👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Every time I take a cop to trial I win tickets get dismissed because of no evidence !! 🐽🐽🐽🐽🎥🎥🎥🐷🐷🐷😂😂😂😂
👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾
Where is the logic here? Not all assault results in noticeable physical injury. Yes, the defendant might have acted disproportionately by stabbing in response to the physical assault...But how was he to know the attacker would not injure him severely?
A redirect examination may help here. The defendant's attorney would then need to ask him about stuff the prosecution said, and allow him to testify about stuff like why he believed he was being assaulted even though he sustained no injuries. Of course, a redirect examination would need to be followed up by another cross-examination.
Kya koi is vedio ki hindi kr skta h
Where's the band? lol
😱😱😱
coming hear amber heard trial
👏👏👏👏
The central content is good, but the presentation style is really wooden. It needs to speed up. It sounds like a child reading in class - it needs to sound more conversational. Drop the music - it doesn't add anything at all and distracts from the content, when the content is all talking. I get why you added the 'humour' at the end but in my view it doesn't work, not entirely appropriate and just slows down the video. Even when you're learning stand-up comedy they treat it seriously and don't add unnecessary humour. The animation is fine but doesn't add much, but script appearing on the screen would work just as well and would benefit some people more than the animation. The example is useful though.
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
.. was that a cross? It sounded like an extension of the other's sides examination in chief
The first cross-examination was basically how NOT to do it.
Why are people wearing wigs?
Evil. The poor guy was assaulted and you don't care. You just want a conviction because "the police arrested him".
Sir, how long have you been your wife?