If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a penguin will fly overhead backlitten for a nice shot. Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f Nikon Z6 III amzn.to/3yNZEah Nikkor 40mm f2 amzn.to/3AEcecL Nikon 600mm f6.3 amzn.to/4fR5SXH Sony ZVE1 amzn.to/4fWqzRY Zeiss 55mm f1.8 amzn.to/3MgBVm6 All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Imagine being a camera enthusiast named Tony and coming across this channel for the first time. “Wait, what did he say? Tony what?”You'd think you were losing your mind.
Maybe I am in the minority, but I enjoyed your nature walk content most. I went to portrait sessions with my channel this last year, but am trying to get back to 90% nature content as it simply puts me where I want to be and I have a great day regardless if I post the content.
SERIOUS SUGGESTION: I find myself wondering if your Nikon color problem outdoors versus indoors could be caused by the CRI on your lights (color rendition index). I know people love LEDs because they’re easy and put out a lot of light, but they don’t put out full spectrum light, especially in the reds.
@@cameraconspiraciesit’s just the way of nature. Which is why veganism is so unnatural. Sorry to collapse your world in one comment. Carnivore diet is the way to go.
I’m thinking of returning to micro 4/3. LUMIX G9II was had such steady footage. I have no dignity left. Sony A7IV is a nice image but the IBIS is lacking.
Sony is pretty stable if you use digital stab with IBIS. But the price, weight, and what, you loose one stop of DR between ISO 50 - 1200 and from 1200 to 12800 you loose half a stop. Which is definitely laughable for the price you pay.
The 4K 120 in the a6700/FX30 is super noisy and really needs to be over-exposed by two stops and having really slow super zooms would make it difficult to not have ISOs up in the thousands
To be fair you're losing 5x the light when using 120fps. Even when going from the first base iso two the second, you're still 1 full stop short on the fx30
I don't think it's as bad as the Fuji Kasey had. That was ROUGH. I have an A7S3 and FX30, hands down the A7S3 is RIDICULOUS for 4k120, not much can touch it. The FX30 is noisier overall I find, but I still love it. Seeing as how I do have the big brother though, when I want 4k120 or even HD 240, I use the A7S3.
@@snaprifice Yeah, I think the 4K120 from the FX30 can be great. I was just responding to the commenter in the video specifically asking about it as a wildlife kit. Super zooms have slow apertures and you often find yourself shooting in dim environments (forests, etc.) which means you'll be boosting the ISO a lot which isn't a great option for the 4K120 in those cameras
Not much can touch the A7S3 and FX3 for clean slowmo video with AF. Slow zooms? The only way you can get a fast tele is a 10k plus prime lens, otherwise vast majority of tele zooms are slow.
One of his talking points is how lusting after gear is pointless. I started out with an A6000 and there's nothing wrong with it. I took more of an interest in video though, something which successors do much, MUCH better than the A6000. If I was still only doing photography the A6000 would be just fine, in fact, I still have an A6600 which I use for photos still.
@@Ausknutz We're talking for video. I'm pretty much always in Normal for photos. I just shot a quick clip yesterday on my Zfc with 16-50/VR lens in Sport as I was going to pan around and it looked great.
Take R5 Mark II, there you have everything you need. Much greater dynamic range, better auto-focus, finally normal codecs for editing combined with C-Log 2 can be really magical. FullHD 240p I saw that looks stunning so with wildlife we can achieve real cinema
Idk Man, I think the R5II will be a better camera than the Z6III, but that incredible 600mm PF that you have is a lens I have been debating for a while. The 600mm F6.3 PF is going to be WAY better I think than a fixed aperture like mad budget telephoto Canon 600mm F11. I'm sure it's much lighter, and I know you are saving a lot of money in the lens. At the same time, the R5II and being able to better use your Canon glass or future Canon glass may be worth it. Just like you, I have shot pretty much all of the cameras. The R5II is one that I have not, but I suspect it to be a better camera body than the Z6III for almost certain. Best of luck in your journey Kasey.
I had the Panasonic S1R + S5 Mark II with the 24-70mm, 70-200mm f/2.8 S Pro, and 50mm f/1.4 S Pro lenses. I sold everything and got an R5 Mark II, which I got on day one. I also have a Z6 III and a Z8, and with these three cameras, you can’t go wrong. Even though, for me, the Z8 remains the best for photography, I like the R5 Mark II because I’ve always used Canon in DSLR. I gave Panasonic a chance, but the autofocus is really terrible-so bad that even the S5 Mark II couldn’t track a dog walking slowly!
Love the Channel and here is a question. I bought the Sony Zeiss 55mm t1.8 because you raved about it so much. It seemed so boring and over priced on paper but wow Iove it now that I tried it. Wondering if you have tried any other Sony Zeiss Primes like the 24mm t1.8, 35mm t1.4 or 50mm t1.4? Are they worth buying?
3:24 - Commenter is Wrong. ... Nikon Z6 III is not perfect camera, yes is Nikon Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens is very expensive lens yes this BUT the image is magic. Did you see deer footage. Deer video: "We Aren't Worthy... Nikon Z6 III Wildlife Review with 600mm f6.3"
I have a Spyder Checkr 24, which it appears you do as well. It's not as good as a "Video Checker" as it does not use the same primaries to reference, BUT Davinci Resolve has a panel to correct for it. I have found it somewhat tricky to get working properly, however, when it does, it does really well. I have a Sony A7SIII and FX30, I've been converting from SLog3 to Black Magic Video gamma's and gamut's and I've been pretty happy with the results doing that. Even if I don't color correct using the color chart panel, I still like the results of Black Magic's "look". Something to play with maybe. I will say, I think Fuji, Nikon, and Canon have better color rendering out of the box even if it's not "accurate", it's more pleasing than Sony's to be sure.
OK, I will get serious in the comments section of Camera Conspiracies channel (I apologize for my inappropriate behavior) but here we go - I do like buying different camera brands and models to compare. (A bit what Kasey is doing, but not so intensely). I'm convinced, that for video one should not buy Nikon, Olympus or Fuji. The brands that make best cameras for video are Panasonic, Sony and to some extend Canon. (Now, obviously, I do not talk about high-end cinema cameras here). These three brands (Nikon, Oly and Fuji) feel somehow "photography oriented" if that makes sense. Of course, one can record gorgeous video with pretty much any late model camera. The end result is entirely dependent on the skills and effort of the user, not that much on the camera used. That's not the point. My theory is, that with these brands, the way video is implemented - feature, ease of use etc. - feels like an afterthought. And just to add, that I say that as a proud owner of a Nikon system (Z6 II and 4 lenses), so if I was a brainless fanboy I would praise my own brand and choice.
Ironically, as you were debunking the Z6 III's flickering in the shadows, I looked in your own shadows and saw flickering. It wasn't enough to notice without specifically looking for it, but it's there FWIW. P.S. count me in on the R5 II video. Nothing pleases us more than watching you spend money. I actually got my R5 II from pre-order and I'll shoot it tomorrow for the first time. If you didn't pre-order, be prepared to wait.
I was watching a R5ii wildlife video and he was shooting a Magnificent riflebird dancing. Wish we had those around here… really cool. Not that you asked….
okay mr know-it-all here but when you said that with the apsc a6700 you get an equivalent focal length of 166-830mm which is correct, but then you also multiplied the aperture with the crop factor which is not correct. when you add an optical teleconverter it will give a smaller effective aperture, e.g 9 instead of 6.3 with a 1.4x, which affects light gathering and toneh, but while the crop of a smaller sensor n and digital crop will effectively change the focal length, it will not change the toneh and light gathering. the reason you get less toneh on a crop sensor is that you have to back up to fit the same subject in the frame, you have to be further from the subject which makes the relative distance between the subject and the background smaller which means less toneh. however when you film wildlife you almost never fill the frame, especially with birds, so you won’t get any less subject separation with apsc. only in the rare cases where you are close enough to fit the entire bird on a full frame sensor so that with an apsc you have to step backwards or zoom out will you get less toneh separation
I want to see the R6 III whenever that is released. R6 II is a great camera for its price. No ibis wobble, more video features and better af is my wishlist, besides more lenses obviously hehe. Love my R6 but its showing its age.
Add deeper buffer, upgraded EVF and LCD - from the old R5 parts bin - perhaps the new LP(P) battery extending battery life and 4K 120. Be a great start.
It's a camera I would probably pounce on if I saw the right deal. I NEVER see deals on it lol. Cheapest I've seen is $5997 with tax new, and like $5300 used. Too high I think.
@@cameraconspiracies I see it's $5K USD new on BHphoto and $4,2K used there. But I'm guessing you'd have to pay import tax in Canada to buy it from the US?
Remember all the Canon Ads in National Geographic and Other Magazines? Great Wildlife Shots and Listed Which Model and Lens Back then Canon AE-1 was the Shitz
I never bought another camera since Nikon D200 and my photos always win photo contests and clients give me millions for my portraits. I never buy anything new cause my skills are timeless.
I currently use Olympus micro, 4/3 with three f/1.8 premium primes, thinking about jumping ships to full frame, The Nikon D850 & Z7II are both cheaper than OM-1 MK2, Do you think OM systems is dying system.
"Stabilization is very jerky for slow motion street videography." - that's caused by over-compensation. It seems to default to something similar to the "Boost IS" mode of Lumix cameras. The latter produce exactly the same jerky movements. Fortunately, Boost IS can be disabled on Lumixes.
I enjoy your channel, but I’m going to go into grumpy old man mode for a moment and criticize… You spend a lot of time addressing the shortcomings of camera features like AF and IBIS. That’s fair, because neither is perfect, especially when you are using them to make up for shortcomings in your chosen methods. I grew up in a photography world without either (without video, too, although what I’m saying applies to video as well as stills). In those days if you wanted photos that weren’t blurry, you had to learn some technique. Using a telephoto or macro lens almost always required a good tripod. Today when I am using a long (VR) lens (on a body with IBIS) to photograph a bird, it would never occur to me to try to hand hold it. I have a sturdy tripod with a Wimberley gimbal (I tried a Chinese knockoff gimbal and it didn’t work), and I’ve learned to use it to follow moving subjects. Smoothly. The VR and IBIS doesn’t jerk because the camera movements are smooth. Technology has come a long way, but it works best when combined with skill. Developing skill, at least for me, adds to the joy of my photography. I know you want a perfect camera that takes care of such things, but maybe it’s a wild goose chase.
Even Sony didn't jerk around like this Nikon. Panasonic and Olympus have it figured out. And for the most part it's perfectly stable until moving around. Technology is already here to ditch the useless tripod.
Call me mad, but I think we wouldn't need any IBIS at all if manufacturers hadn't gone all-in on rolling shutter chasing the dynamic range dream. It's actually ridiculous to me that the devices we use specifically to capture motion are BAD AT CAPTURING MOTION. I have a 4k video camera with global shutter, and though it's weird and frustrating to use in ways I won't go into here, I have found camera shake literally doesn't matter at all any more, because it looks fine when the entire image moves instead of the everything turning to jelly. Vibration is a normal thing your eyes/brain can compensate for in a video, but jellied mess is not. (Also, I love whip pans and crash zooms and can do them all the time without them looking terrible). Sony have got the idea with the A9 III - we had correct motion in the film era, and it's time it returned. A return to global shutter for video will make all current video cameras, regardless of their bells & whistles, obsolete, and those in the future will wonder why we put up with rolling shutter at all.
@@C.I... Well now I want to hear about the weird and frustrating ways of global shutter! Never been a fan of IBIS for video especially on slower rolling shutter sensors.
@@cameraconspiraciesevery single canon and Sony wildlife photographer that also used Nikon agrees Nikon is top for telephoto VR (Duade, Jan, Steve, Fabian, Wild Alaska etc). Vlogging ibis is a different story with the Z6iii/Zf and its focus point ibis. The jerkiness in your wildlife footage is a technique or setting issue. Or should we believe you and your 3 uses of the camera is really demonstrating its full capabilities?
@@livejames9374 None of them are doing handheld video of moving subjects. It works great if you're not moving. The only other mode is sports mode which never looks good.
Would you ever consider renting gear?. I know it can be expensive on some of the stuff. I think the camera companies are afraid to send you their products to review as they want yes men reviewers and there are plenty of those on youtube.
For canon APS-C(even for fullframe) for wildlife.. you really should consider the "Sigma 150-600mm F5-6,3 DG OS HSM".. i know you sh!t on sigma alot and "nO 3d PoPp!!1".. But you really should at least check it out.
You need to get out more to do wildlife. I think that your focussing is off with the Nikon as well. The lens is much more capable. You need to sell the Nikon and go back to your beloved Canon until it lets you down again. And then maybe Sony again? It’s never ending!
Why don't u sell your footage to someone or somewhere? It looks great and professional, the camera will pay itself and u have a second income instead of relying on RUclips views
Hi! They say that the perspective on 4/3 is different from full frame. Could you shoot a video on one of your 3D POP lenses, and then attach it to the m4/3 via a speed booster and set the same exposure for false color, will you see the difference in the video?
When are you going to compare classic Nikon glass to your beloved canon classic glass? And you are already getting bored with one of if not the best 600mm prime lens? Will you weaken and go back to a zoom lens for wildlife? Who knows.
T14 with an almost 1 inch sensor though. T11 is full frame and a prime lens. It would be way worse than my Nikon prime, but I don't think I need super high end wildlife gear.
Definitely go Canon! It's boring kit but you haven't wasted enough money on it yet. Then, after finding out it's boring, you'll sell everything for a new 'wildlife phone that does 1048 fps in a banned Chinese raw format, before finally switching to medium format Fuji and hiring an assistant to bring a tripod, winch and extra bag of batteries and a truck. This channel is fantasy!
A law "tends" to happen, a theory is a pigeon holed law, 'there's a 90% chance this is true'. But it's because nobody could pass the curriculum unless they agreed with that theory. In calculus two, it's called polynomial order of magnitude. If a comet has more than five pieces, due to force decoupling harmonics as it nears a star, there is as much gravitation within the asteroids as betwean the other bodies. So it's a time wise solution, smellovision. Superfluids decouple, but the easier solution is that it's a freeway, Hyundai always goes as slower as pope mobile, it's just his hat, big white cardinal hat to eat lucky charms and listen to Pantera, no big deal if you can build a case. Thus matter slows down for the Macy's Day sale event, everything been sold out in the 1888 big horsehair calendar. The floats just keep the warehouse warm until it's made into an airport goat shoot. If you fill enough crap, you get a ladenfrost fire from the Nephilim Mormon sisters of christ. But she's bound to get a forest green Rubicon because work is always more than jerk, she really couldn't be Satan. A monstrous camera would be overbearing, at least get a million dollars. Gotta sell my truck, if you keep buying stuff, they would have a million dollars in the transformers universe, have you ever seen two ships with same name? Their not even the same ships. But rich people have daycare, it's got all sorts of functionality, tenebrous war shelters in the Japanese DJ Antoine missing 2008 Le Fat Hombre, before Dubai.
I think most tests show that the GH7 is better in DR than the Z6iii, actually. Thanks to the combination of DR Boost in the GH7 and Z6iii's "partially stacked" sensor I suppose.
![Kodak Black - Catch Fire [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A4ch-olIuZo/mqdefault.jpg)
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a penguin will fly overhead backlitten for a nice shot.
Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f
Nikon Z6 III amzn.to/3yNZEah
Nikkor 40mm f2 amzn.to/3AEcecL
Nikon 600mm f6.3 amzn.to/4fR5SXH
Sony ZVE1 amzn.to/4fWqzRY
Zeiss 55mm f1.8 amzn.to/3MgBVm6
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Imagine being a camera enthusiast named Tony and coming across this channel for the first time. “Wait, what did he say? Tony what?”You'd think you were losing your mind.
He is, his name is Tony Northrup and look up this channels video from 4 years ago called "Tony Northrup's Bokeh Addiction Intervention".
Tony 2
So many Tony mentioned in this video but there can only be ONE 💪
Casey got famous because of Tony
Maybe I am in the minority, but I enjoyed your nature walk content most. I went to portrait sessions with my channel this last year, but am trying to get back to 90% nature content as it simply puts me where I want to be and I have a great day regardless if I post the content.
Nikon looks better
SERIOUS SUGGESTION: I find myself wondering if your Nikon color problem outdoors versus indoors could be caused by the CRI on your lights (color rendition index). I know people love LEDs because they’re easy and put out a lot of light, but they don’t put out full spectrum light, especially in the reds.
I am so glad I watch everything. Nicely done.
the look of this Nikon vid is more 3D…. pops out .. colours less warm but real
That chickadee stole a spider's egg case. Hundreds of spiderlings inside. It knew what it was doing!
Birds are dicks lol.
@@cameraconspiraciesit’s just the way of nature. Which is why veganism is so unnatural. Sorry to collapse your world in one comment. Carnivore diet is the way to go.
I read in an article that in winter, coal tits ambush sleeping pipistrelle bats and kill them to eat them. There are also photos of them eating mice.
@@cameraconspiracies They are continuing their proud and may I say dickish legacy of their dinosaur ancestors.
@@Zimmy123 what a tit.
Conspiracy Geographic
Yeah R5ii would be sweet to see the comparisons. The search goes on. Your channel lives on 😅
I’m thinking of returning to micro 4/3. LUMIX G9II was had such steady footage. I have no dignity left. Sony A7IV is a nice image but the IBIS is lacking.
Hold fast the a7s iv will be out soon
Just wait, Sony is coming out with the a7s iv really soon
Sony is pretty stable if you use digital stab with IBIS.
But the price, weight, and what, you loose one stop of DR between ISO 50 - 1200 and from 1200 to 12800 you loose half a stop. Which is definitely laughable for the price you pay.
Where can I get the Alien Aids LUT? Thinking of switching to using that instead of the Subterranean Leprosy Blaster LUT.
I want a copy of the alien AIDS LUT too. I want it really bad.
The 4K 120 in the a6700/FX30 is super noisy and really needs to be over-exposed by two stops and having really slow super zooms would make it difficult to not have ISOs up in the thousands
To be fair, the 4k120 on the z6III is REALLY noisy too.
To be fair you're losing 5x the light when using 120fps. Even when going from the first base iso two the second, you're still 1 full stop short on the fx30
I don't think it's as bad as the Fuji Kasey had. That was ROUGH. I have an A7S3 and FX30, hands down the A7S3 is RIDICULOUS for 4k120, not much can touch it. The FX30 is noisier overall I find, but I still love it. Seeing as how I do have the big brother though, when I want 4k120 or even HD 240, I use the A7S3.
@@snaprifice Yeah, I think the 4K120 from the FX30 can be great. I was just responding to the commenter in the video specifically asking about it as a wildlife kit. Super zooms have slow apertures and you often find yourself shooting in dim environments (forests, etc.) which means you'll be boosting the ISO a lot which isn't a great option for the 4K120 in those cameras
Not much can touch the A7S3 and FX3 for clean slowmo video with AF. Slow zooms? The only way you can get a fast tele is a 10k plus prime lens, otherwise vast majority of tele zooms are slow.
I don't know why I watch content that doesn't interest me with my a6000. But you make me click on the video every time.😂
One of his talking points is how lusting after gear is pointless. I started out with an A6000 and there's nothing wrong with it. I took more of an interest in video though, something which successors do much, MUCH better than the A6000. If I was still only doing photography the A6000 would be just fine, in fact, I still have an A6600 which I use for photos still.
I really like how measuring aperture in Toneh is getting a common thing in this videos. I't simply more accurate and allows more beautiful bokeh.
I always forget what amazing, terrifying creatures spiders are - and then I see incredible macro shots like we witnessed today.
Seriously, Sport mode for VR when panning/moving around, otherwise you get the large jerks.
I found Sport mode to be worse when shooting motorsports. I felt I got sharper photos with the "normal" VR on my 70-200 f/4
@@Ausknutz We're talking for video. I'm pretty much always in Normal for photos.
I just shot a quick clip yesterday on my Zfc with 16-50/VR lens in Sport as I was going to pan around and it looked great.
OMG that "alien AIDS LUT" could be amazing for someone doing a They Live Remake.
Can you please make it available for download?
On some cameras you can choose which VR mode to use: Look for something like "sports" which will help with moving subjects.
The Fuji XS20 groups, on Facebook, are just people complaining about their cameras overheating when they turn them on.
Take R5 Mark II, there you have everything you need. Much greater dynamic range, better auto-focus, finally normal codecs for editing combined with C-Log 2 can be really magical. FullHD 240p I saw that looks stunning so with wildlife we can achieve real cinema
Nah! Double the price 😂
4k60 lineskiped, yeah.
@@planetfun85 Only you haven't seen what it looks like, and I have.
@@planetfun85I have it and it actually looks good. It’s not like the previous R5.
@@RKusz ,compared to what ? For 4300$ there are better options.
Idk Man, I think the R5II will be a better camera than the Z6III, but that incredible 600mm PF that you have is a lens I have been debating for a while. The 600mm F6.3 PF is going to be WAY better I think than a fixed aperture like mad budget telephoto Canon 600mm F11. I'm sure it's much lighter, and I know you are saving a lot of money in the lens. At the same time, the R5II and being able to better use your Canon glass or future Canon glass may be worth it. Just like you, I have shot pretty much all of the cameras. The R5II is one that I have not, but I suspect it to be a better camera body than the Z6III for almost certain. Best of luck in your journey Kasey.
I watched your videos on Nikon , had a talk with Ted pickle and bought the zf ; my bread will never be frozen in time itself
Happy with my set-up, Z9 and added Z6III, nothing to complain..love this combo.
I had the Panasonic S1R + S5 Mark II with the 24-70mm, 70-200mm f/2.8 S Pro, and 50mm f/1.4 S Pro lenses. I sold everything and got an R5 Mark II, which I got on day one. I also have a Z6 III and a Z8, and with these three cameras, you can’t go wrong. Even though, for me, the Z8 remains the best for photography, I like the R5 Mark II because I’ve always used Canon in DSLR. I gave Panasonic a chance, but the autofocus is really terrible-so bad that even the S5 Mark II couldn’t track a dog walking slowly!
Canon doesnt even offer 4k 60fps on these new cams. Lol
Love the Channel and here is a question. I bought the Sony Zeiss 55mm t1.8 because you raved about it so much. It seemed so boring and over priced on paper but wow Iove it now that I tried it. Wondering if you have tried any other Sony Zeiss Primes like the 24mm t1.8, 35mm t1.4 or 50mm t1.4? Are they worth buying?
3:24 - Commenter is Wrong. ... Nikon Z6 III is not perfect camera, yes is Nikon Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens is very expensive lens yes this BUT the image is magic. Did you see deer footage. Deer video: "We Aren't Worthy... Nikon Z6 III Wildlife Review with 600mm f6.3"
I have a Spyder Checkr 24, which it appears you do as well. It's not as good as a "Video Checker" as it does not use the same primaries to reference, BUT Davinci Resolve has a panel to correct for it. I have found it somewhat tricky to get working properly, however, when it does, it does really well. I have a Sony A7SIII and FX30, I've been converting from SLog3 to Black Magic Video gamma's and gamut's and I've been pretty happy with the results doing that. Even if I don't color correct using the color chart panel, I still like the results of Black Magic's "look". Something to play with maybe. I will say, I think Fuji, Nikon, and Canon have better color rendering out of the box even if it's not "accurate", it's more pleasing than Sony's to be sure.
Another incredible information video on camera gear.
I have Fuji xh2s and use 100-400. I’d like the 150-600 Shoot motor sport and sheepdog trials. It’s fine
Great video! Entertaining and informative. You make some good points.
canon yes.
Something I figured out to help the jerk while following a subject on Nikon ibis is to switch to the sport mode for.
OK, I will get serious in the comments section of Camera Conspiracies channel (I apologize for my inappropriate behavior) but here we go - I do like buying different camera brands and models to compare. (A bit what Kasey is doing, but not so intensely). I'm convinced, that for video one should not buy Nikon, Olympus or Fuji. The brands that make best cameras for video are Panasonic, Sony and to some extend Canon. (Now, obviously, I do not talk about high-end cinema cameras here). These three brands (Nikon, Oly and Fuji) feel somehow "photography oriented" if that makes sense. Of course, one can record gorgeous video with pretty much any late model camera. The end result is entirely dependent on the skills and effort of the user, not that much on the camera used. That's not the point. My theory is, that with these brands, the way video is implemented - feature, ease of use etc. - feels like an afterthought. And just to add, that I say that as a proud owner of a Nikon system (Z6 II and 4 lenses), so if I was a brainless fanboy I would praise my own brand and choice.
You were unlucky with the seagull. Our forests are full of them digging their burrows.
what would an R7 with the Canon 100-300 f2.8 do for you - is 480mm full frame equiv good enough?
Ironically, as you were debunking the Z6 III's flickering in the shadows, I looked in your own shadows and saw flickering. It wasn't enough to notice without specifically looking for it, but it's there FWIW.
P.S. count me in on the R5 II video. Nothing pleases us more than watching you spend money. I actually got my R5 II from pre-order and I'll shoot it tomorrow for the first time. If you didn't pre-order, be prepared to wait.
Debating on waiting for the R6 III, but who knows when that will come.
@@cameraconspiracies there are strong rumors that the R6 III will come out this fall! That's probably before the next shipment of R5 IIs arrives.
@@cameraconspiracies Make the switch jabroni.
It’s in stock a lot of places
I didn't notice it.
I was watching a R5ii wildlife video and he was shooting a Magnificent riflebird dancing. Wish we had those around here… really cool. Not that you asked….
@@dccoletrain Jan Wegener is the best
okay mr know-it-all here but when you said that with the apsc a6700 you get an equivalent focal length of 166-830mm which is correct, but then you also multiplied the aperture with the crop factor which is not correct. when you add an optical teleconverter it will give a smaller effective aperture, e.g 9 instead of 6.3 with a 1.4x, which affects light gathering and toneh, but while the crop of a smaller sensor n and digital crop will effectively change the focal length, it will not change the toneh and light gathering. the reason you get less toneh on a crop sensor is that you have to back up to fit the same subject in the frame, you have to be further from the subject which makes the relative distance between the subject and the background smaller which means less toneh. however when you film wildlife you almost never fill the frame, especially with birds, so you won’t get any less subject separation with apsc. only in the rare cases where you are close enough to fit the entire bird on a full frame sensor so that with an apsc you have to step backwards or zoom out will you get less toneh separation
For the equivalent scene, you have to multiply the aperture like I did.
16:06 Getting Kasey angry is why we are all here, the video stuff…😴
Macro photography wedding rings are my niche AMA
No queations. Macro is easy
I want to see the R6 III whenever that is released. R6 II is a great camera for its price. No ibis wobble, more video features and better af is my wishlist, besides more lenses obviously hehe. Love my R6 but its showing its age.
Add deeper buffer, upgraded EVF and LCD - from the old R5 parts bin - perhaps the new LP(P) battery extending battery life and 4K 120. Be a great start.
I'd love to see you review the Canon C70. Considering how much you like the look of the C100, it would probably be amazing :)
P.S. It's on sale now ;)
It's a camera I would probably pounce on if I saw the right deal. I NEVER see deals on it lol. Cheapest I've seen is $5997 with tax new, and like $5300 used. Too high I think.
@@cameraconspiracies I see it's $5K USD new on BHphoto and $4,2K used there. But I'm guessing you'd have to pay import tax in Canada to buy it from the US?
@@yawningmarmot Yea $6431, more than brand new lol.
@@cameraconspiracies Woah, that's far out!
I started seeking out EF glass after picking up a cheap 5d III. If you keep talking about it you’ll drive the price up 😢
Remember all the Canon Ads in
National Geographic
and Other Magazines?
Great Wildlife Shots
and Listed Which
Model and Lens
Back then Canon AE-1
was the Shitz
If the z8 had hd240, it would be close to a perfect camera imo. Personally I would use that feature often, but would still be useful from time to time
Am I dreaming or was the best wildlife footage Kasey got, filmed either on the Sony A7s3 or the GH6, like seriously.
Kasey, what should I buy? I'll photograph anything. I don't care. I just want a camera and a lens. Moto G Power?
I never bought another camera since Nikon D200 and my photos always win photo contests and clients give me millions for my portraits.
I never buy anything new cause my skills are timeless.
Millions for a nikon photo? Lies
At 17:36 confirms there are no flickering on Nikon Z6iii, Robert may have bad copy or auto iso settings. Z6iii looks good on my screen
Flickering is a real thing.
@@livejames9374 maybe, but it's not bad as some had reported, there are many pro users of Z6iii already and i see only a few are complaining
@@livejames9374,on all cameras.
For different colors I think you could try before switching systems calibrate your monitor. It would be cheaper although less fun.
Yep fuj xt5 240 fps buddy needs the 100 - 400 / and or 150-600 f8 need light but toneh comes around just get low . And wait for that 500 prime
It’s funny how smitten you were with that camera. Now…. It just shows that we as humans are NEVER happy
you need to switch to sport ibis mode. it's made for video. you'll have less catch-up-jerks
And less stable static shots.
I currently use Olympus micro, 4/3 with three f/1.8 premium primes, thinking about jumping ships to full frame, The Nikon D850 & Z7II are both cheaper than OM-1 MK2, Do you think OM systems is dying system.
Wow that wildlife intro animation was fire. 😄
Sometime we must go a long way out of our way to go a short distance.
"Stabilization is very jerky for slow motion street videography." - that's caused by over-compensation. It seems to default to something similar to the "Boost IS" mode of Lumix cameras. The latter produce exactly the same jerky movements. Fortunately, Boost IS can be disabled on Lumixes.
Nice greens in that shot... ideal light was fortunate at that moment
Of course we want to see you get the canon stuff to compare against the nikon stuff
I prefer the stabilization in sport mode for most things...seems to be less jerky...but yea, it's not Panasonic level.
honestly checking out the canon seems like a decent idea. Maybe it's better, who knows
That spider egg shot was great!
spider egg, amazing footage!
3x stacked 2x teleconverters solve all problems
I think there is an aftermarket accessory to add a mind-controlled robotic third arm for the Nikon. Fixed.
Nicky boy has beautiful wildlife, what are we doing? I feel like we should enjoy what we have for now.
Makes sense to go to something else since Nikon has been the pinnacle of image quality on this channel.
I enjoy your channel, but I’m going to go into grumpy old man mode for a moment and criticize… You spend a lot of time addressing the shortcomings of camera features like AF and IBIS. That’s fair, because neither is perfect, especially when you are using them to make up for shortcomings in your chosen methods. I grew up in a photography world without either (without video, too, although what I’m saying applies to video as well as stills). In those days if you wanted photos that weren’t blurry, you had to learn some technique. Using a telephoto or macro lens almost always required a good tripod. Today when I am using a long (VR) lens (on a body with IBIS) to photograph a bird, it would never occur to me to try to hand hold it. I have a sturdy tripod with a Wimberley gimbal (I tried a Chinese knockoff gimbal and it didn’t work), and I’ve learned to use it to follow moving subjects. Smoothly. The VR and IBIS doesn’t jerk because the camera movements are smooth. Technology has come a long way, but it works best when combined with skill. Developing skill, at least for me, adds to the joy of my photography. I know you want a perfect camera that takes care of such things, but maybe it’s a wild goose chase.
Even Sony didn't jerk around like this Nikon. Panasonic and Olympus have it figured out. And for the most part it's perfectly stable until moving around. Technology is already here to ditch the useless tripod.
Call me mad, but I think we wouldn't need any IBIS at all if manufacturers hadn't gone all-in on rolling shutter chasing the dynamic range dream. It's actually ridiculous to me that the devices we use specifically to capture motion are BAD AT CAPTURING MOTION.
I have a 4k video camera with global shutter, and though it's weird and frustrating to use in ways I won't go into here, I have found camera shake literally doesn't matter at all any more, because it looks fine when the entire image moves instead of the everything turning to jelly. Vibration is a normal thing your eyes/brain can compensate for in a video, but jellied mess is not.
(Also, I love whip pans and crash zooms and can do them all the time without them looking terrible).
Sony have got the idea with the A9 III - we had correct motion in the film era, and it's time it returned. A return to global shutter for video will make all current video cameras, regardless of their bells & whistles, obsolete, and those in the future will wonder why we put up with rolling shutter at all.
@@C.I... Well now I want to hear about the weird and frustrating ways of global shutter! Never been a fan of IBIS for video especially on slower rolling shutter sensors.
@@cameraconspiraciesevery single canon and Sony wildlife photographer that also used Nikon agrees Nikon is top for telephoto VR (Duade, Jan, Steve, Fabian, Wild Alaska etc). Vlogging ibis is a different story with the Z6iii/Zf and its focus point ibis. The jerkiness in your wildlife footage is a technique or setting issue. Or should we believe you and your 3 uses of the camera is really demonstrating its full capabilities?
@@livejames9374 None of them are doing handheld video of moving subjects. It works great if you're not moving. The only other mode is sports mode which never looks good.
Funny how you called that spider a daddy long legs. We call crane flies - daddy long legs and as the name implies they're not a spider.
7:17 that made me chuckle
Have you tested VR set to 'sport' on the Z6iii? This is supposed to optimise panning shots, especially on those long lenses.
Yes, it makes static shots much less stable.
@@cameraconspiracies Aah, it would also be irritating having to switch between the two modes I'd imagine, unless it could be mapped to my menu.
Go for it. I'm curious how it looks compared to c100 on aps-c.
What is that finger speed rate in your intro? Is that a new chair? Have a great weekend....
Can you find out if the ttartisan 500mm has the budget friendly magic for wildlife?
I've reviewed it, yes.
@@cameraconspiracies I am a moron
15:34 You looked like a Chernobyl firefighter.
i'd be interested in the canon 600 f11 comparison :)
I hear it in your voice already, The cannon r5 mark ii is coming in your future.
Would you ever consider renting gear?. I know it can be expensive on some of the stuff. I think the camera companies are afraid to send you their products to review as they want yes men reviewers and there are plenty of those on youtube.
Good morning everyone! I hope you all enjoy this video as much as I surely will🙌🏽
It's Dirk Dwindlehammer. I don't know what that chickadee had. Whatever it was he was feasting.
G'day.
If you work for Nat Geo, or rich with bitcoins, $10k is nuttin.
But why would you want to be cheap when you could be exotic?
You could sell the left handed Nikon and buy a Sony 600mm f4 for even more money and slap it on the zv10 mkii.
For canon APS-C(even for fullframe) for wildlife.. you really should consider the "Sigma 150-600mm F5-6,3 DG OS HSM".. i know you sh!t on sigma alot and "nO 3d PoPp!!1"..
But you really should at least check it out.
You need to get out more to do wildlife. I think that your focussing is off with the Nikon as well. The lens is much more capable. You need to sell the Nikon and go back to your beloved Canon until it lets you down again. And then maybe Sony again? It’s never ending!
I hope the R5ii is better than the Z6iii, for almost double the price... $4,200 Big American inflated doll hairs.
i saw comments with huge production flaws of R5II
@@FessoidI ordered two. One was DOA. Canon will iron out production issues. Stuff happens
Funny thing is, when jump cut out of what the f… then shows us the cinema by leaving in bullsh!t
Good content
Please get the r5ii
Why don't u sell your footage to someone or somewhere? It looks great and professional, the camera will pay itself and u have a second income instead of relying on RUclips views
Hi! They say that the perspective on 4/3 is different from full frame. Could you shoot a video on one of your 3D POP lenses, and then attach it to the m4/3 via a speed booster and set the same exposure for false color, will you see the difference in the video?
C’mon, you’ve actually never looked better than with Nikon color. 😁 Nikon’s fine. Your eyes are miscalibrated. 👀
When are you going to compare classic Nikon glass to your beloved canon classic glass? And you are already getting bored with one of if not the best 600mm prime lens? Will you weaken and go back to a zoom lens for wildlife? Who knows.
anyone has a link to the alien aids LUT?? Need it for a cinematic. for a friend. An Online friend.
Dude! That's me you're looking for it for. So like, work faster! I really need it. It's gonna make my They Live reimagination much easier to shoot.
@iamionscat9035 heeyyyy online friend and happy birthing day too :)))
@@auviance222 Thanks man! You're the best!
Disgusting footage with a Toneh 10.4 to 14 but yet you are considering buying the RF 600mm F11
T14 with an almost 1 inch sensor though. T11 is full frame and a prime lens. It would be way worse than my Nikon prime, but I don't think I need super high end wildlife gear.
Definitely go Canon! It's boring kit but you haven't wasted enough money on it yet. Then, after finding out it's boring, you'll sell everything for a new 'wildlife phone that does 1048 fps in a banned Chinese raw format, before finally switching to medium format Fuji and hiring an assistant to bring a tripod, winch and extra bag of batteries and a truck. This channel is fantasy!
This video offended me greatly. I enjoy both drinking milk and lobster meat. I have been personally attacked.
A law "tends" to happen, a theory is a pigeon holed law, 'there's a 90% chance this is true'. But it's because nobody could pass the curriculum unless they agreed with that theory. In calculus two, it's called polynomial order of magnitude. If a comet has more than five pieces, due to force decoupling harmonics as it nears a star, there is as much gravitation within the asteroids as betwean the other bodies. So it's a time wise solution, smellovision. Superfluids decouple, but the easier solution is that it's a freeway, Hyundai always goes as slower as pope mobile, it's just his hat, big white cardinal hat to eat lucky charms and listen to Pantera, no big deal if you can build a case. Thus matter slows down for the Macy's Day sale event, everything been sold out in the 1888 big horsehair calendar. The floats just keep the warehouse warm until it's made into an airport goat shoot. If you fill enough crap, you get a ladenfrost fire from the Nephilim Mormon sisters of christ. But she's bound to get a forest green Rubicon because work is always more than jerk, she really couldn't be Satan. A monstrous camera would be overbearing, at least get a million dollars. Gotta sell my truck, if you keep buying stuff, they would have a million dollars in the transformers universe, have you ever seen two ships with same name? Their not even the same ships. But rich people have daycare, it's got all sorts of functionality, tenebrous war shelters in the Japanese DJ Antoine missing 2008 Le Fat Hombre, before Dubai.
I think most tests show that the GH7 is better in DR than the Z6iii, actually. Thanks to the combination of DR Boost in the GH7 and Z6iii's "partially stacked" sensor I suppose.
Maybe it’s time to invest in some skincare babes.