If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a penguin will fly overhead backlitten for a nice shot. Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f Nikon Z6 III amzn.to/3yNZEah Nikkor 40mm f2 amzn.to/3AEcecL Nikon 600mm f6.3 amzn.to/4fR5SXH Sony ZVE1 amzn.to/4fWqzRY Zeiss 55mm f1.8 amzn.to/3MgBVm6 All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Imagine being a camera enthusiast named Tony and coming across this channel for the first time. “Wait, what did he say? Tony what?”You'd think you were losing your mind.
@@cameraconspiraciesit’s just the way of nature. Which is why veganism is so unnatural. Sorry to collapse your world in one comment. Carnivore diet is the way to go.
SERIOUS SUGGESTION: I find myself wondering if your Nikon color problem outdoors versus indoors could be caused by the CRI on your lights (color rendition index). I know people love LEDs because they’re easy and put out a lot of light, but they don’t put out full spectrum light, especially in the reds.
Maybe I am in the minority, but I enjoyed your nature walk content most. I went to portrait sessions with my channel this last year, but am trying to get back to 90% nature content as it simply puts me where I want to be and I have a great day regardless if I post the content.
The 4K 120 in the a6700/FX30 is super noisy and really needs to be over-exposed by two stops and having really slow super zooms would make it difficult to not have ISOs up in the thousands
To be fair you're losing 5x the light when using 120fps. Even when going from the first base iso two the second, you're still 1 full stop short on the fx30
@snaprifice Yeah, I think the 4K120 from the FX30 can be great. I was just responding to the commenter in the video specifically asking about it as a wildlife kit. Super zooms have slow apertures and you often find yourself shooting in dim environments (forests, etc.) which means you'll be boosting the ISO a lot which isn't a great option for the 4K120 in those cameras
Not much can touch the A7S3 and FX3 for clean slowmo video with AF. Slow zooms? The only way you can get a fast tele is a 10k plus prime lens, otherwise vast majority of tele zooms are slow.
the a6700 sensor has an 1.5x crop on 4k 120fps so it is actually shooting with a smaller than a micro four thirds sensor. of course it's gonna be noisy. I researched this because I want the best 4k 120fps possible. The results were quite surprising, the best image quality + autofocus combo actually belongs to the A9 iii today.
I’m thinking of returning to micro 4/3. LUMIX G9II was had such steady footage. I have no dignity left. Sony A7IV is a nice image but the IBIS is lacking.
Sony is pretty stable if you use digital stab with IBIS. But the price, weight, and what, you loose one stop of DR between ISO 50 - 1200 and from 1200 to 12800 you loose half a stop. Which is definitely laughable for the price you pay.
Take R5 Mark II, there you have everything you need. Much greater dynamic range, better auto-focus, finally normal codecs for editing combined with C-Log 2 can be really magical. FullHD 240p I saw that looks stunning so with wildlife we can achieve real cinema
@@Ausknutz We're talking for video. I'm pretty much always in Normal for photos. I just shot a quick clip yesterday on my Zfc with 16-50/VR lens in Sport as I was going to pan around and it looked great.
Love the Channel and here is a question. I bought the Sony Zeiss 55mm t1.8 because you raved about it so much. It seemed so boring and over priced on paper but wow Iove it now that I tried it. Wondering if you have tried any other Sony Zeiss Primes like the 24mm t1.8, 35mm t1.4 or 50mm t1.4? Are they worth buying?
I had the Panasonic S1R + S5 Mark II with the 24-70mm, 70-200mm f/2.8 S Pro, and 50mm f/1.4 S Pro lenses. I sold everything and got an R5 Mark II, which I got on day one. I also have a Z6 III and a Z8, and with these three cameras, you can’t go wrong. Even though, for me, the Z8 remains the best for photography, I like the R5 Mark II because I’ve always used Canon in DSLR. I gave Panasonic a chance, but the autofocus is really terrible-so bad that even the S5 Mark II couldn’t track a dog walking slowly!
Ironically, as you were debunking the Z6 III's flickering in the shadows, I looked in your own shadows and saw flickering. It wasn't enough to notice without specifically looking for it, but it's there FWIW. P.S. count me in on the R5 II video. Nothing pleases us more than watching you spend money. I actually got my R5 II from pre-order and I'll shoot it tomorrow for the first time. If you didn't pre-order, be prepared to wait.
Remember all the Canon Ads in National Geographic and Other Magazines? Great Wildlife Shots and Listed Which Model and Lens Back then Canon AE-1 was the Shitz
3:24 - Commenter is Wrong. ... Nikon Z6 III is not perfect camera, yes is Nikon Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens is very expensive lens yes this BUT the image is magic. Did you see deer footage. Deer video: "We Aren't Worthy... Nikon Z6 III Wildlife Review with 600mm f6.3"
I currently use Olympus micro, 4/3 with three f/1.8 premium primes, thinking about jumping ships to full frame, The Nikon D850 & Z7II are both cheaper than OM-1 MK2, Do you think OM systems is dying system.
I was watching a R5ii wildlife video and he was shooting a Magnificent riflebird dancing. Wish we had those around here… really cool. Not that you asked….
I never bought another camera since Nikon D200 and my photos always win photo contests and clients give me millions for my portraits. I never buy anything new cause my skills are timeless.
I enjoy your channel, but I’m going to go into grumpy old man mode for a moment and criticize… You spend a lot of time addressing the shortcomings of camera features like AF and IBIS. That’s fair, because neither is perfect, especially when you are using them to make up for shortcomings in your chosen methods. I grew up in a photography world without either (without video, too, although what I’m saying applies to video as well as stills). In those days if you wanted photos that weren’t blurry, you had to learn some technique. Using a telephoto or macro lens almost always required a good tripod. Today when I am using a long (VR) lens (on a body with IBIS) to photograph a bird, it would never occur to me to try to hand hold it. I have a sturdy tripod with a Wimberley gimbal (I tried a Chinese knockoff gimbal and it didn’t work), and I’ve learned to use it to follow moving subjects. Smoothly. The VR and IBIS doesn’t jerk because the camera movements are smooth. Technology has come a long way, but it works best when combined with skill. Developing skill, at least for me, adds to the joy of my photography. I know you want a perfect camera that takes care of such things, but maybe it’s a wild goose chase.
Even Sony didn't jerk around like this Nikon. Panasonic and Olympus have it figured out. And for the most part it's perfectly stable until moving around. Technology is already here to ditch the useless tripod.
Call me mad, but I think we wouldn't need any IBIS at all if manufacturers hadn't gone all-in on rolling shutter chasing the dynamic range dream. It's actually ridiculous to me that the devices we use specifically to capture motion are BAD AT CAPTURING MOTION. I have a 4k video camera with global shutter, and though it's weird and frustrating to use in ways I won't go into here, I have found camera shake literally doesn't matter at all any more, because it looks fine when the entire image moves instead of the everything turning to jelly. Vibration is a normal thing your eyes/brain can compensate for in a video, but jellied mess is not. (Also, I love whip pans and crash zooms and can do them all the time without them looking terrible). Sony have got the idea with the A9 III - we had correct motion in the film era, and it's time it returned. A return to global shutter for video will make all current video cameras, regardless of their bells & whistles, obsolete, and those in the future will wonder why we put up with rolling shutter at all.
@@C.I... Well now I want to hear about the weird and frustrating ways of global shutter! Never been a fan of IBIS for video especially on slower rolling shutter sensors.
@@cameraconspiraciesevery single canon and Sony wildlife photographer that also used Nikon agrees Nikon is top for telephoto VR (Duade, Jan, Steve, Fabian, Wild Alaska etc). Vlogging ibis is a different story with the Z6iii/Zf and its focus point ibis. The jerkiness in your wildlife footage is a technique or setting issue. Or should we believe you and your 3 uses of the camera is really demonstrating its full capabilities?
@@livejames9374 None of them are doing handheld video of moving subjects. It works great if you're not moving. The only other mode is sports mode which never looks good.
Idk Man, I think the R5II will be a better camera than the Z6III, but that incredible 600mm PF that you have is a lens I have been debating for a while. The 600mm F6.3 PF is going to be WAY better I think than a fixed aperture like mad budget telephoto Canon 600mm F11. I'm sure it's much lighter, and I know you are saving a lot of money in the lens. At the same time, the R5II and being able to better use your Canon glass or future Canon glass may be worth it. Just like you, I have shot pretty much all of the cameras. The R5II is one that I have not, but I suspect it to be a better camera body than the Z6III for almost certain. Best of luck in your journey Kasey.
It's a camera I would probably pounce on if I saw the right deal. I NEVER see deals on it lol. Cheapest I've seen is $5997 with tax new, and like $5300 used. Too high I think.
@@cameraconspiracies I see it's $5K USD new on BHphoto and $4,2K used there. But I'm guessing you'd have to pay import tax in Canada to buy it from the US?
"Stabilization is very jerky for slow motion street videography." - that's caused by over-compensation. It seems to default to something similar to the "Boost IS" mode of Lumix cameras. The latter produce exactly the same jerky movements. Fortunately, Boost IS can be disabled on Lumixes.
I want to see the R6 III whenever that is released. R6 II is a great camera for its price. No ibis wobble, more video features and better af is my wishlist, besides more lenses obviously hehe. Love my R6 but its showing its age.
Add deeper buffer, upgraded EVF and LCD - from the old R5 parts bin - perhaps the new LP(P) battery extending battery life and 4K 120. Be a great start.
okay mr know-it-all here but when you said that with the apsc a6700 you get an equivalent focal length of 166-830mm which is correct, but then you also multiplied the aperture with the crop factor which is not correct. when you add an optical teleconverter it will give a smaller effective aperture, e.g 9 instead of 6.3 with a 1.4x, which affects light gathering and toneh, but while the crop of a smaller sensor n and digital crop will effectively change the focal length, it will not change the toneh and light gathering. the reason you get less toneh on a crop sensor is that you have to back up to fit the same subject in the frame, you have to be further from the subject which makes the relative distance between the subject and the background smaller which means less toneh. however when you film wildlife you almost never fill the frame, especially with birds, so you won’t get any less subject separation with apsc. only in the rare cases where you are close enough to fit the entire bird on a full frame sensor so that with an apsc you have to step backwards or zoom out will you get less toneh separation
OK, I will get serious in the comments section of Camera Conspiracies channel (I apologize for my inappropriate behavior) but here we go - I do like buying different camera brands and models to compare. (A bit what Kasey is doing, but not so intensely). I'm convinced, that for video one should not buy Nikon, Olympus or Fuji. The brands that make best cameras for video are Panasonic, Sony and to some extend Canon. (Now, obviously, I do not talk about high-end cinema cameras here). These three brands (Nikon, Oly and Fuji) feel somehow "photography oriented" if that makes sense. Of course, one can record gorgeous video with pretty much any late model camera. The end result is entirely dependent on the skills and effort of the user, not that much on the camera used. That's not the point. My theory is, that with these brands, the way video is implemented - feature, ease of use etc. - feels like an afterthought. And just to add, that I say that as a proud owner of a Nikon system (Z6 II and 4 lenses), so if I was a brainless fanboy I would praise my own brand and choice.
Would love to see you cover how Fuji destroyed its autofocus in it's top of the line cams with its latest firmware... and refuses to acknowledge there is a problem. A dude named "edvard" on RUclips has some great videos about this issue.
Yea he has mentioned edvard before. He is entertaining but I got the point already and now he is on a new tangent about a sentence someone said, let’s make a whole video about my hurt feelings.
Would you ever consider renting gear?. I know it can be expensive on some of the stuff. I think the camera companies are afraid to send you their products to review as they want yes men reviewers and there are plenty of those on youtube.
T14 with an almost 1 inch sensor though. T11 is full frame and a prime lens. It would be way worse than my Nikon prime, but I don't think I need super high end wildlife gear.
Hi! They say that the perspective on 4/3 is different from full frame. Could you shoot a video on one of your 3D POP lenses, and then attach it to the m4/3 via a speed booster and set the same exposure for false color, will you see the difference in the video?
Remember that $10,000 was after the incredible Camera Canada discount and on top of that open box price on the lens. Probably like $20,000 normal people money
You need to get out more to do wildlife. I think that your focussing is off with the Nikon as well. The lens is much more capable. You need to sell the Nikon and go back to your beloved Canon until it lets you down again. And then maybe Sony again? It’s never ending!
I really don't see any magic in the Nikon. The best 2 cams you had for wildlife were the GH6 and the Canon R5. You resisted the ZV E-1. Don't resist the R5ii. But maybe it's not your cup of tea. And why not try the ZV E-1 for wildlife too?
For canon APS-C(even for fullframe) for wildlife.. you really should consider the "Sigma 150-600mm F5-6,3 DG OS HSM".. i know you sh!t on sigma alot and "nO 3d PoPp!!1".. But you really should at least check it out.
I think Nikon strikes an awesome balance of colour science and performance…to me it sits between Fujis Colours and Sonys performance…ive shot and tested all systems…Nikon has a nice lens lineup (28-400, 150-600)…also they have a natural rendering… BUT: having shot Canon with adapter before, since you love old Canon glass Canon makes a LOT of Sense…superb AF, superb video, good slomo, ok Dynamic range, very good old Lenses performance… But then you get the canon „look…“…man i got tired of that quick, after half a year i couldnt stand it anymore, it tries to beautify everithing but making it all look very unnatural…Nikon i can make look the same, but i cant make Canon look natural, always that silvery vaseline like smear over everything with too much edge sharpness… Just my opinion ofc… and in real world use the z6iii for example performed amazing tbh…was very pleased with EVERY shoot i did…limited dr in RAW when pushed is the only downside…the Photo files are awesome
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a penguin will fly overhead backlitten for a nice shot.
Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f
Nikon Z6 III amzn.to/3yNZEah
Nikkor 40mm f2 amzn.to/3AEcecL
Nikon 600mm f6.3 amzn.to/4fR5SXH
Sony ZVE1 amzn.to/4fWqzRY
Zeiss 55mm f1.8 amzn.to/3MgBVm6
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Imagine being a camera enthusiast named Tony and coming across this channel for the first time. “Wait, what did he say? Tony what?”You'd think you were losing your mind.
He is, his name is Tony Northrup and look up this channels video from 4 years ago called "Tony Northrup's Bokeh Addiction Intervention".
Tony 2
So many Tony mentioned in this video but there can only be ONE 💪
Casey got famous because of Tony
I don't know why I watch content that doesn't interest me with my a6000. But you make me click on the video every time.😂
That chickadee stole a spider's egg case. Hundreds of spiderlings inside. It knew what it was doing!
Birds are dicks lol.
@@cameraconspiraciesit’s just the way of nature. Which is why veganism is so unnatural. Sorry to collapse your world in one comment. Carnivore diet is the way to go.
I read in an article that in winter, coal tits ambush sleeping pipistrelle bats and kill them to eat them. There are also photos of them eating mice.
@@cameraconspiracies They are continuing their proud and may I say dickish legacy of their dinosaur ancestors.
@@Zimmy123 what a tit.
SERIOUS SUGGESTION: I find myself wondering if your Nikon color problem outdoors versus indoors could be caused by the CRI on your lights (color rendition index). I know people love LEDs because they’re easy and put out a lot of light, but they don’t put out full spectrum light, especially in the reds.
Maybe I am in the minority, but I enjoyed your nature walk content most. I went to portrait sessions with my channel this last year, but am trying to get back to 90% nature content as it simply puts me where I want to be and I have a great day regardless if I post the content.
The 4K 120 in the a6700/FX30 is super noisy and really needs to be over-exposed by two stops and having really slow super zooms would make it difficult to not have ISOs up in the thousands
To be fair, the 4k120 on the z6III is REALLY noisy too.
To be fair you're losing 5x the light when using 120fps. Even when going from the first base iso two the second, you're still 1 full stop short on the fx30
@snaprifice Yeah, I think the 4K120 from the FX30 can be great. I was just responding to the commenter in the video specifically asking about it as a wildlife kit. Super zooms have slow apertures and you often find yourself shooting in dim environments (forests, etc.) which means you'll be boosting the ISO a lot which isn't a great option for the 4K120 in those cameras
Not much can touch the A7S3 and FX3 for clean slowmo video with AF. Slow zooms? The only way you can get a fast tele is a 10k plus prime lens, otherwise vast majority of tele zooms are slow.
the a6700 sensor has an 1.5x crop on 4k 120fps so it is actually shooting with a smaller than a micro four thirds sensor. of course it's gonna be noisy. I researched this because I want the best 4k 120fps possible. The results were quite surprising, the best image quality + autofocus combo actually belongs to the A9 iii today.
the look of this Nikon vid is more 3D…. pops out .. colours less warm but real
Yeah R5ii would be sweet to see the comparisons. The search goes on. Your channel lives on 😅
Nikon looks better
Where can I get the Alien Aids LUT? Thinking of switching to using that instead of the Subterranean Leprosy Blaster LUT.
I want a copy of the alien AIDS LUT too. I want it really bad.
I am so glad I watch everything. Nicely done.
Conspiracy Geographic
I’m thinking of returning to micro 4/3. LUMIX G9II was had such steady footage. I have no dignity left. Sony A7IV is a nice image but the IBIS is lacking.
Hold fast the a7s iv will be out soon
Just wait, Sony is coming out with the a7s iv really soon
Sony is pretty stable if you use digital stab with IBIS.
But the price, weight, and what, you loose one stop of DR between ISO 50 - 1200 and from 1200 to 12800 you loose half a stop. Which is definitely laughable for the price you pay.
I always forget what amazing, terrifying creatures spiders are - and then I see incredible macro shots like we witnessed today.
I watched your videos on Nikon , had a talk with Ted pickle and bought the zf ; my bread will never be frozen in time itself
Happy with my set-up, Z9 and added Z6III, nothing to complain..love this combo.
OMG that "alien AIDS LUT" could be amazing for someone doing a They Live Remake.
Can you please make it available for download?
I really like how measuring aperture in Toneh is getting a common thing in this videos. I't simply more accurate and allows more beautiful bokeh.
At 17:36 confirms there are no flickering on Nikon Z6iii, Robert may have bad copy or auto iso settings. Z6iii looks good on my screen
Flickering is a real thing.
@@livejames9374 maybe, but it's not bad as some had reported, there are many pro users of Z6iii already and i see only a few are complaining
@@livejames9374,on all cameras.
anyone has a link to the alien aids LUT?? Need it for a cinematic. for a friend. An Online friend.
Dude! That's me you're looking for it for. So like, work faster! I really need it. It's gonna make my They Live reimagination much easier to shoot.
@iamionscat9035 heeyyyy online friend and happy birthing day too :)))
@@auviance222 Thanks man! You're the best!
On some cameras you can choose which VR mode to use: Look for something like "sports" which will help with moving subjects.
Another incredible information video on camera gear.
Wow that wildlife intro animation was fire. 😄
Take R5 Mark II, there you have everything you need. Much greater dynamic range, better auto-focus, finally normal codecs for editing combined with C-Log 2 can be really magical. FullHD 240p I saw that looks stunning so with wildlife we can achieve real cinema
Nah! Double the price 😂
4k60 lineskiped, yeah.
@@planetfun85 Only you haven't seen what it looks like, and I have.
@@planetfun85I have it and it actually looks good. It’s not like the previous R5.
@@RKusz ,compared to what ? For 4300$ there are better options.
what would an R7 with the Canon 100-300 f2.8 do for you - is 480mm full frame equiv good enough?
The Fuji XS20 groups, on Facebook, are just people complaining about their cameras overheating when they turn them on.
Seriously, Sport mode for VR when panning/moving around, otherwise you get the large jerks.
I found Sport mode to be worse when shooting motorsports. I felt I got sharper photos with the "normal" VR on my 70-200 f/4
@@Ausknutz We're talking for video. I'm pretty much always in Normal for photos.
I just shot a quick clip yesterday on my Zfc with 16-50/VR lens in Sport as I was going to pan around and it looked great.
Love the Channel and here is a question. I bought the Sony Zeiss 55mm t1.8 because you raved about it so much. It seemed so boring and over priced on paper but wow Iove it now that I tried it. Wondering if you have tried any other Sony Zeiss Primes like the 24mm t1.8, 35mm t1.4 or 50mm t1.4? Are they worth buying?
Great video! Entertaining and informative. You make some good points.
Something I figured out to help the jerk while following a subject on Nikon ibis is to switch to the sport mode for.
I had the Panasonic S1R + S5 Mark II with the 24-70mm, 70-200mm f/2.8 S Pro, and 50mm f/1.4 S Pro lenses. I sold everything and got an R5 Mark II, which I got on day one. I also have a Z6 III and a Z8, and with these three cameras, you can’t go wrong. Even though, for me, the Z8 remains the best for photography, I like the R5 Mark II because I’ve always used Canon in DSLR. I gave Panasonic a chance, but the autofocus is really terrible-so bad that even the S5 Mark II couldn’t track a dog walking slowly!
Canon doesnt even offer 4k 60fps on these new cams. Lol
Ironically, as you were debunking the Z6 III's flickering in the shadows, I looked in your own shadows and saw flickering. It wasn't enough to notice without specifically looking for it, but it's there FWIW.
P.S. count me in on the R5 II video. Nothing pleases us more than watching you spend money. I actually got my R5 II from pre-order and I'll shoot it tomorrow for the first time. If you didn't pre-order, be prepared to wait.
Debating on waiting for the R6 III, but who knows when that will come.
@@cameraconspiracies there are strong rumors that the R6 III will come out this fall! That's probably before the next shipment of R5 IIs arrives.
@@cameraconspiracies Make the switch jabroni.
It’s in stock a lot of places
I didn't notice it.
Remember all the Canon Ads in
National Geographic
and Other Magazines?
Great Wildlife Shots
and Listed Which
Model and Lens
Back then Canon AE-1
was the Shitz
Nice greens in that shot... ideal light was fortunate at that moment
Can you find out if the ttartisan 500mm has the budget friendly magic for wildlife?
I've reviewed it, yes.
@@cameraconspiracies I am a moron
Am I dreaming or was the best wildlife footage Kasey got, filmed either on the Sony A7s3 or the GH6, like seriously.
3:24 - Commenter is Wrong. ... Nikon Z6 III is not perfect camera, yes is Nikon Z 600mm f/6.3 VR S lens is very expensive lens yes this BUT the image is magic. Did you see deer footage. Deer video: "We Aren't Worthy... Nikon Z6 III Wildlife Review with 600mm f6.3"
I currently use Olympus micro, 4/3 with three f/1.8 premium primes, thinking about jumping ships to full frame, The Nikon D850 & Z7II are both cheaper than OM-1 MK2, Do you think OM systems is dying system.
I was watching a R5ii wildlife video and he was shooting a Magnificent riflebird dancing. Wish we had those around here… really cool. Not that you asked….
@@dccoletrain Jan Wegener is the best
If the z8 had hd240, it would be close to a perfect camera imo. Personally I would use that feature often, but would still be useful from time to time
That spider egg shot was great!
I have Fuji xh2s and use 100-400. I’d like the 150-600 Shoot motor sport and sheepdog trials. It’s fine
Have you tested VR set to 'sport' on the Z6iii? This is supposed to optimise panning shots, especially on those long lenses.
Yes, it makes static shots much less stable.
@@cameraconspiracies Aah, it would also be irritating having to switch between the two modes I'd imagine, unless it could be mapped to my menu.
I never bought another camera since Nikon D200 and my photos always win photo contests and clients give me millions for my portraits.
I never buy anything new cause my skills are timeless.
Millions for a nikon photo? Lies
I enjoy your channel, but I’m going to go into grumpy old man mode for a moment and criticize… You spend a lot of time addressing the shortcomings of camera features like AF and IBIS. That’s fair, because neither is perfect, especially when you are using them to make up for shortcomings in your chosen methods. I grew up in a photography world without either (without video, too, although what I’m saying applies to video as well as stills). In those days if you wanted photos that weren’t blurry, you had to learn some technique. Using a telephoto or macro lens almost always required a good tripod. Today when I am using a long (VR) lens (on a body with IBIS) to photograph a bird, it would never occur to me to try to hand hold it. I have a sturdy tripod with a Wimberley gimbal (I tried a Chinese knockoff gimbal and it didn’t work), and I’ve learned to use it to follow moving subjects. Smoothly. The VR and IBIS doesn’t jerk because the camera movements are smooth. Technology has come a long way, but it works best when combined with skill. Developing skill, at least for me, adds to the joy of my photography. I know you want a perfect camera that takes care of such things, but maybe it’s a wild goose chase.
Even Sony didn't jerk around like this Nikon. Panasonic and Olympus have it figured out. And for the most part it's perfectly stable until moving around. Technology is already here to ditch the useless tripod.
Call me mad, but I think we wouldn't need any IBIS at all if manufacturers hadn't gone all-in on rolling shutter chasing the dynamic range dream. It's actually ridiculous to me that the devices we use specifically to capture motion are BAD AT CAPTURING MOTION.
I have a 4k video camera with global shutter, and though it's weird and frustrating to use in ways I won't go into here, I have found camera shake literally doesn't matter at all any more, because it looks fine when the entire image moves instead of the everything turning to jelly. Vibration is a normal thing your eyes/brain can compensate for in a video, but jellied mess is not.
(Also, I love whip pans and crash zooms and can do them all the time without them looking terrible).
Sony have got the idea with the A9 III - we had correct motion in the film era, and it's time it returned. A return to global shutter for video will make all current video cameras, regardless of their bells & whistles, obsolete, and those in the future will wonder why we put up with rolling shutter at all.
@@C.I... Well now I want to hear about the weird and frustrating ways of global shutter! Never been a fan of IBIS for video especially on slower rolling shutter sensors.
@@cameraconspiraciesevery single canon and Sony wildlife photographer that also used Nikon agrees Nikon is top for telephoto VR (Duade, Jan, Steve, Fabian, Wild Alaska etc). Vlogging ibis is a different story with the Z6iii/Zf and its focus point ibis. The jerkiness in your wildlife footage is a technique or setting issue. Or should we believe you and your 3 uses of the camera is really demonstrating its full capabilities?
@@livejames9374 None of them are doing handheld video of moving subjects. It works great if you're not moving. The only other mode is sports mode which never looks good.
You were unlucky with the seagull. Our forests are full of them digging their burrows.
Idk Man, I think the R5II will be a better camera than the Z6III, but that incredible 600mm PF that you have is a lens I have been debating for a while. The 600mm F6.3 PF is going to be WAY better I think than a fixed aperture like mad budget telephoto Canon 600mm F11. I'm sure it's much lighter, and I know you are saving a lot of money in the lens. At the same time, the R5II and being able to better use your Canon glass or future Canon glass may be worth it. Just like you, I have shot pretty much all of the cameras. The R5II is one that I have not, but I suspect it to be a better camera body than the Z6III for almost certain. Best of luck in your journey Kasey.
I'd love to see you review the Canon C70. Considering how much you like the look of the C100, it would probably be amazing :)
P.S. It's on sale now ;)
It's a camera I would probably pounce on if I saw the right deal. I NEVER see deals on it lol. Cheapest I've seen is $5997 with tax new, and like $5300 used. Too high I think.
@@cameraconspiracies I see it's $5K USD new on BHphoto and $4,2K used there. But I'm guessing you'd have to pay import tax in Canada to buy it from the US?
@@yawningmarmot Yea $6431, more than brand new lol.
@@cameraconspiracies Woah, that's far out!
16:06 Getting Kasey angry is why we are all here, the video stuff…😴
Macro photography wedding rings are my niche AMA
No queations. Macro is easy
Good morning everyone! I hope you all enjoy this video as much as I surely will🙌🏽
It’s funny how smitten you were with that camera. Now…. It just shows that we as humans are NEVER happy
I started seeking out EF glass after picking up a cheap 5d III. If you keep talking about it you’ll drive the price up 😢
Go for it. I'm curious how it looks compared to c100 on aps-c.
"Stabilization is very jerky for slow motion street videography." - that's caused by over-compensation. It seems to default to something similar to the "Boost IS" mode of Lumix cameras. The latter produce exactly the same jerky movements. Fortunately, Boost IS can be disabled on Lumixes.
spider egg, amazing footage!
I want to see the R6 III whenever that is released. R6 II is a great camera for its price. No ibis wobble, more video features and better af is my wishlist, besides more lenses obviously hehe. Love my R6 but its showing its age.
Add deeper buffer, upgraded EVF and LCD - from the old R5 parts bin - perhaps the new LP(P) battery extending battery life and 4K 120. Be a great start.
Kasey, what should I buy? I'll photograph anything. I don't care. I just want a camera and a lens. Moto G Power?
15:34 You looked like a Chernobyl firefighter.
I prefer the stabilization in sport mode for most things...seems to be less jerky...but yea, it's not Panasonic level.
i'd be interested in the canon 600 f11 comparison :)
For different colors I think you could try before switching systems calibrate your monitor. It would be cheaper although less fun.
Please get the r5ii
okay mr know-it-all here but when you said that with the apsc a6700 you get an equivalent focal length of 166-830mm which is correct, but then you also multiplied the aperture with the crop factor which is not correct. when you add an optical teleconverter it will give a smaller effective aperture, e.g 9 instead of 6.3 with a 1.4x, which affects light gathering and toneh, but while the crop of a smaller sensor n and digital crop will effectively change the focal length, it will not change the toneh and light gathering. the reason you get less toneh on a crop sensor is that you have to back up to fit the same subject in the frame, you have to be further from the subject which makes the relative distance between the subject and the background smaller which means less toneh. however when you film wildlife you almost never fill the frame, especially with birds, so you won’t get any less subject separation with apsc. only in the rare cases where you are close enough to fit the entire bird on a full frame sensor so that with an apsc you have to step backwards or zoom out will you get less toneh separation
For the equivalent scene, you have to multiply the aperture like I did.
you need to switch to sport ibis mode. it's made for video. you'll have less catch-up-jerks
And less stable static shots.
What is that finger speed rate in your intro? Is that a new chair? Have a great weekend....
7:17 that made me chuckle
Sometime we must go a long way out of our way to go a short distance.
I think there is an aftermarket accessory to add a mind-controlled robotic third arm for the Nikon. Fixed.
OK, I will get serious in the comments section of Camera Conspiracies channel (I apologize for my inappropriate behavior) but here we go - I do like buying different camera brands and models to compare. (A bit what Kasey is doing, but not so intensely). I'm convinced, that for video one should not buy Nikon, Olympus or Fuji. The brands that make best cameras for video are Panasonic, Sony and to some extend Canon. (Now, obviously, I do not talk about high-end cinema cameras here). These three brands (Nikon, Oly and Fuji) feel somehow "photography oriented" if that makes sense. Of course, one can record gorgeous video with pretty much any late model camera. The end result is entirely dependent on the skills and effort of the user, not that much on the camera used. That's not the point. My theory is, that with these brands, the way video is implemented - feature, ease of use etc. - feels like an afterthought. And just to add, that I say that as a proud owner of a Nikon system (Z6 II and 4 lenses), so if I was a brainless fanboy I would praise my own brand and choice.
Yep fuj xt5 240 fps buddy needs the 100 - 400 / and or 150-600 f8 need light but toneh comes around just get low . And wait for that 500 prime
Funny how you called that spider a daddy long legs. We call crane flies - daddy long legs and as the name implies they're not a spider.
Of course we want to see you get the canon stuff to compare against the nikon stuff
Nicky boy has beautiful wildlife, what are we doing? I feel like we should enjoy what we have for now.
Makes sense to go to something else since Nikon has been the pinnacle of image quality on this channel.
Would love to see you cover how Fuji destroyed its autofocus in it's top of the line cams with its latest firmware... and refuses to acknowledge there is a problem. A dude named "edvard" on RUclips has some great videos about this issue.
Yea he has mentioned edvard before. He is entertaining but I got the point already and now he is on a new tangent about a sentence someone said, let’s make a whole video about my hurt feelings.
Would you ever consider renting gear?. I know it can be expensive on some of the stuff. I think the camera companies are afraid to send you their products to review as they want yes men reviewers and there are plenty of those on youtube.
honestly checking out the canon seems like a decent idea. Maybe it's better, who knows
Disgusting footage with a Toneh 10.4 to 14 but yet you are considering buying the RF 600mm F11
T14 with an almost 1 inch sensor though. T11 is full frame and a prime lens. It would be way worse than my Nikon prime, but I don't think I need super high end wildlife gear.
3x stacked 2x teleconverters solve all problems
Hi! They say that the perspective on 4/3 is different from full frame. Could you shoot a video on one of your 3D POP lenses, and then attach it to the m4/3 via a speed booster and set the same exposure for false color, will you see the difference in the video?
Funny thing is, when jump cut out of what the f… then shows us the cinema by leaving in bullsh!t
Good content
Remember that $10,000 was after the incredible Camera Canada discount and on top of that open box price on the lens.
Probably like $20,000 normal people money
It's Dirk Dwindlehammer. I don't know what that chickadee had. Whatever it was he was feasting.
Do you think you could still get your Sony a7s3 back
I wouldn't want it back.
But why would you want to be cheap when you could be exotic?
You could sell the left handed Nikon and buy a Sony 600mm f4 for even more money and slap it on the zv10 mkii.
You need to get out more to do wildlife. I think that your focussing is off with the Nikon as well. The lens is much more capable. You need to sell the Nikon and go back to your beloved Canon until it lets you down again. And then maybe Sony again? It’s never ending!
I hear it in your voice already, The cannon r5 mark ii is coming in your future.
canon yes.
He sounded like Mark Smith 😂
I really don't see any magic in the Nikon. The best 2 cams you had for wildlife were the GH6 and the Canon R5. You resisted the ZV E-1. Don't resist the R5ii. But maybe it's not your cup of tea. And why not try the ZV E-1 for wildlife too?
This video offended me greatly. I enjoy both drinking milk and lobster meat. I have been personally attacked.
For canon APS-C(even for fullframe) for wildlife.. you really should consider the "Sigma 150-600mm F5-6,3 DG OS HSM".. i know you sh!t on sigma alot and "nO 3d PoPp!!1"..
But you really should at least check it out.
Hey mate! Could you try a dx 16-50vr lens on z6iii in 4k120 creep motion?
If you work for Nat Geo, or rich with bitcoins, $10k is nuttin.
G'day.
15:40 lmao
I hope the R5ii is better than the Z6iii, for almost double the price... $4,200 Big American inflated doll hairs.
i saw comments with huge production flaws of R5II
@@FessoidI ordered two. One was DOA. Canon will iron out production issues. Stuff happens
I think Nikon strikes an awesome balance of colour science and performance…to me it sits between Fujis Colours and Sonys performance…ive shot and tested all systems…Nikon has a nice lens lineup (28-400, 150-600)…also they have a natural rendering…
BUT: having shot Canon with adapter before, since you love old Canon glass Canon makes a LOT of Sense…superb AF, superb video, good slomo, ok Dynamic range, very good old Lenses performance…
But then you get the canon „look…“…man i got tired of that quick, after half a year i couldnt stand it anymore, it tries to beautify everithing but making it all look very unnatural…Nikon i can make look the same, but i cant make Canon look natural, always that silvery vaseline like smear over everything with too much edge sharpness…
Just my opinion ofc… and in real world use the z6iii for example performed amazing tbh…was very pleased with EVERY shoot i did…limited dr in RAW when pushed is the only downside…the Photo files are awesome