I think that Yendel penalty 4:30 ish in has to be a yellow such a quick attack ruined thoughts ? It needs to be taken out the game smart pen or ruing running rugby making it more stop start ??
English commentary is too much explanation and bullshit. NZ and Australian commentators are better. English commentators need not to repeat a sequence of play by explaining. We're watching it of course. Over explanation is a bit noisy.
Helps the casual viewer understand what’s going on but I agree it can sometimes be a bit much. Commentary needed a bit more energy at times this game since there were some good tries and breaks made
I don't particularly agree with you. I watch a fair bit of super rugby & the rugby championship, the antipodeans follow the US model of sports commentary and don't know when actions speak louder than words and just talk for the sake of it (often just rubbish). I find that very annoying. It's a TV, not a radio - we can see what's happening and the commentary is there to 'add value'. But if you prefer that then I can only think that it's what you're used to.
@@tattyheid7279 bruh there was a break by the Bath team and one of the commentators was just full explaining the previous play. The second commentator needs to know when he should keep quite and give the lead commentator to commentate the game.
@@RushRiverside Agreed, I'm not suggesting it's perfect. I know Banahan is fairly new to the media game, hopefully he'll be debriefed. This style can be fairly slick when done properly - I definitely prefer it.
58:15 I am obsessed with this try
Thanks for this..😀Great game.
Everyone is playing too win a championship 🏆🏉 it’s going to be amazing game 🏉
Love this. Thanks for sharing
Great game, well done!
I think that Yendel penalty 4:30 ish in has to be a yellow such a quick attack ruined thoughts ? It needs to be taken out the game smart pen or ruing running rugby making it more stop start ??
Underhill as MOTM? A joke. He knocked the ball on twice, gave up two pens and then on line break failed to make an easy pass for a walk in try.
English commentary is too much explanation and bullshit. NZ and Australian commentators are better.
English commentators need not to repeat a sequence of play by explaining. We're watching it of course.
Over explanation is a bit noisy.
Helps the casual viewer understand what’s going on but I agree it can sometimes be a bit much. Commentary needed a bit more energy at times this game since there were some good tries and breaks made
Matt Banahan is a former player and not a commentator so that’s why he’s basically just explaining everything.
I don't particularly agree with you. I watch a fair bit of super rugby & the rugby championship, the antipodeans follow the US model of sports commentary and don't know when actions speak louder than words and just talk for the sake of it (often just rubbish). I find that very annoying. It's a TV, not a radio - we can see what's happening and the commentary is there to 'add value'. But if you prefer that then I can only think that it's what you're used to.
@@tattyheid7279 bruh there was a break by the Bath team and one of the commentators was just full explaining the previous play. The second commentator needs to know when he should keep quite and give the lead commentator to commentate the game.
@@RushRiverside Agreed, I'm not suggesting it's perfect. I know Banahan is fairly new to the media game, hopefully he'll be debriefed. This style can be fairly slick when done properly - I definitely prefer it.
Why the gay flags on your profile?! Unsubscribed.