This little man with a camera is obviously someone who failed to get into the police himself and has a grudge as a result, policing is a hard enough job as it is without idiots like you making a pastime of bating law enforcement, go and do something useful like some charity work for the needy or something.
I wouldn't say it's baiting them they should know it's a legal activity and something they shouldn't waste there time with if it was hostile surveillance they wouldn't be so obvious would more like hiding in a bush
"Why are you being obnoxious [while I'm trying to violate you rights]" ??????? I think a lot more photographers should decend upon that same PUBLIC FOOTPATH just to prove that it is legal.
I thought asking for ID was suspicious I did not know that you must have permission from the police. what crime have I committed WALT DISNEY police academy
How does giving your name to security/police change anything? They always ask for ID 'just to check you out' but you could still have malicious intent. It's very hard to film anywhere anymore.
Those cops acted disgracefully. Full of aggression and on a power trip. Totally unprofessional. Had to walk away with their tails between their legs. Made themselves a laughing stock for all to see. I despair.
Gives him his name. Checks it on computer. Computer comes back with nothing. Contacts mystic meg,. Mystic meg comes back with nothing. Must not be a terrorist then. Contacts Russell G. Star sign says he was going to meet someone important today.
It's not that the Coppers are worried about the Airport suffering terrorist attack; it's that they are Coppers, and they are being defied. They didn't join the Police Force to have members of the Public winning arguments with them; they joined to push people about, which they would be unable to do without the uniform.
Ray Whitworth this doesn’t just happen at airports pal, this is happening everywhere. The police just don’t like losing arguments because they’re all full of ego, they join the ‘force’ to harass and push people around not to be told what’s right and wrong by the public. So called public servants.
Yep. Tell them to go fúck themselves. Let them falsely detain, arrest and lock you up. Then throw the book at them, report them to IPCC and professional standards. Lodge a civil case.
Just shows how “BUSY” the 🐖🐖🐖 are these days, 6-7 of them for somebody filming with a camera.. yet my Nan had to wait alone for hours when her house got robbed... seems about right..
Yeah it's tripe alright ....you can film anything you like from a public place and you don't need ANYONE'S permission but a 10 buck an hour security guard probably wouldn't know that and doesn't even appear to know they have no right's past the gate entrance to their facility
"Have I committed a crime?" "I've said my piece and now I'm going to take your details". These idiots love operating with ambiguity to confuse you into giving up your rights.
"You're clearly anti-police" because you should be asking for different permission to the one you obtained because we have just revoked that permission and you now need permission from a manager to do something you never needed permission for in the first place
Again should be using Buckingham Palace as the perfect example.... surely if you can take photos of Buckingham Palace then you can photograph a DHL building..
Pleb , Buckingham palace has security tighter than a nuns fanny . Take as many pictures as you want . Just try to climb over the fence and see what happens . It's a totally different situation.
Judge: "Officer, why did you detain, demand details, threaten to arrest and ban these people from the airport?" Officer: "They were taking pictures and video legally in a public place!" Judge: "Case dismissed, damages awarded." Plane spotters have been taking pictures for decades of planes and other things of interest around airports and people take pictures in the terminal of the planes and other passengers all the time on their phones, what is the big problem? And it is highly unlikely that terrorists would be so blatantly obvious if they wanted to surveillance the airport with obvious photographer uniforms and completely in the open.
The police would never be able to reconcile that train of thought, they have their authority and are going to act upon it, even if it is illegal for them to do so, time for individual officers to be held fully accountable for their actions.
It is a public right of way, there is a public bus route on the road. And there is an assumed right of way by it being open to the public without restriction. And of course the sergeant of the airport police station should really know the byelaws of the airport and surrounding areas isn't that in fact his job?
Its private its owned by MAG the roads, the paths,are private,DHL own their land having bought it.the area ahead it the main gatehouse for DHL, and for deliveries via the landside areas of EMA
If its private property then it would be up to the property owner to decide, but as the police identified its a public right of way then these two guys being members of the public are being lawful, they even went out of their way to get some confirmation via email before they made their visit. How more upstanding can you get. These guys are just going about their hobby and being harassed by the filth
Matt: Which part of PACE says I have to give you my details! Which part of PACE says I have to give you my details! Which part of PACE says I have to give you my details! - Just keep asking Matt!
You have to be given the opportunity to leave before you can be criminally trespassed. You were quite happy to leave so not sure what the issue is. You not obligated to ID because you have not committed a crime. You not obligated to show them your pictures.. they cannot delete your photographs and they require a court order to view them.
What about the time and effort of two perfectly able people who's sole effort is to jam up the time of individuals at work, just to get some footage for RUclips?
Jollys Heldone I see your point but you have to understand that as much as it may look like they’re doing it to disrupt the services, it is totally legal to record from a public space, and the police and other services need to understand that and stop wasting their time on trying to enforce ‘acts’ or ‘laws’ that don’t exist. The police SHOULD know the law and because they don’t, that’s actually what is wasting their time, when they could just ignore the photographers!
'There's a public footpath sign over there, do you want to come and look at it?' Cue the tumbleweed as the copper walks away in total silence , because he knows he will be proven wrong! Surely it's their job to establish the facts to determine if they are within the law, and not checking the sign is a neglect of duty.
It is their duty to operate within the law not bullshit people into thinking that they have powers that they do not have. The second line of their oath is 'with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people' and the final part states, 'I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.' It doesn't say that they can dream laws up.
"your not obliged to give your ID" "I don't get why if you got nothing to hide, you just give your ID" just forget what the first statement means thick as a plank of wood
So at the end, the cop says you're free to go, and then says: but the manager of the airport says you've got no permission to come back on airport land taking photos. You were on a public footpath, so surely you can come back to that footpath and take pictures anytime you like, with or without the permission of the manager?
@@harrybowler4681 Private land can have public rights of way or BOATs running across them, and it is impossible to prevent members of the public from enjoying such rights.
Ok you are not a pilot and dont try to make yourself sound like one you look about 17 on your channel maybe younger however yes I can agree with you the aviation laws is "absolute tripe"😂
16:55 That is the reason you record all interactions with police becuase there ego can take charge in seconds. It is clearly not privite land based on the fact that there are council lighting near the footpath as well as a foot path with no clear instruction of land boundrys. This is an illegal stop and it also classed as an infringment of human rights freedom of expression and freedom of media. When police say your beaing problematic it basically means your exercising your rights under the law.
Yes, Brian Dunstan, to make as much trouble as is needed to grind home the point they have the Right to Photograph. They didn't need that special letter to prove anything. Notice that female was quick to scream "personal space" ? THAT is exactly what these photographers should have done. "You are invading my personal space. Back off or be charged with assault". The more "trouble", the quicker this em-passe will be resolved. Maybe draw the medias attention if lucky. The idiot is you, worried about upsetting "working" security people who should know the law better, and butt out.
Now this is where things get a bit grey,, you have to be careful not be inciting trouble or things along that line... But your on the right track, just maybe call it by another name.
@@kellyhunt3958 No. That is the point I am making. "Disturbing the peace" & " Hate Speech" are BAD Leftist laws that must be removed, and this is the way to start.
Nosey "Is this a public right of way?" ...no answer. Nosey "What's the security risk here?" ...no answer. Nosey "Is this part of East Midlands Airport?" ...no answer. Security "you are not taking pictures of that building" These 'security' are so funny. They know so little of the law or of security, they end up drawing more attention to the building than if they'd just left you alone 😂
Well done photographers standing up for your fights and Every members of the public's rights as well . Amazing how many cops turn up but when you need one , where are they ? Others that disagree are cop-suckers .
30 mph speed limit sign in last 10 secs of video.... red ringed? Is that not a national speed limit sign? If so the road is open to public an must have a publicly accessible footpath?
The last time I checked, a police officer serves the public, and airports employ their own security. Police have no rights policing a private company, its trespass and that is a civil matter.
He has a cheek asking a growen man to tell him what his friends name is. Thats cops for you always useing low handed tactic. Then they go home and sleep well at night.
I’m not quite sure why the sergeant thinks he can talk to members of the public in that way. The police are very unprofessional in their interaction here. Very poor.
Well they got your name from the email, got you banned from the airport and managed to move you on. Looks like the police won this round, I also noticed you kept saying you had permission? You don't need permission you should've just stood where you took the photos and stayed there
If you have any understanding of aviation security, photographs of any building or aviation site are prohibited for security due to a photograph of a building could be used in a terrorist attack. Mobile phones are prohibited when working in and around the buildings unless you are granted access to do so
@@purplemonkey4442 it doesn't matter what security policy is - it never trumps the law of the land. If you are on public property then you can film anything you can see.
@@purplemonkey4442 God you're stupid. You need to report google while you're at it. www.google.com/maps/@52.8243017,-1.34691,3a,75y,342.81h,87.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTjEnd3cM1gYpT7ksZc7Wnw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Not really, the police wanted their details and failed to acquire them. Therefore the photographers won the round. You can clearly tell they weren't there for any actual photography, most of these audits aren't there for photography but to troll the police when they try to acquire about their actual business.
@@mjb1957uk so if your at home and someone is recording your children in your home at any time of the day while on public property thats perfectly fine??
As a Security Officer with 18 Years of Experience take it from Me that some people are simply not worth talking too, because no matter what you say they are not Listening and simply want to be Argumentative. Until someone is actually prepared to Arrest you, no one is worth Arguing with.
It's like you are bored with life and intentionally go out looking for trouble because you believe you know the Law and the camera protects you in your mind.
@@DavidSmith-dv7ih 2 more than you then, but then its not about me. Keep firing, you never know, one day you may hit something, even though your insults are as lame as your spelling and punctuation. Clearly you have the courage of your convictions!
i hate the police when they act like this, no crime walk away do not talk to them and do not say anything to them without a solicitor. i know i never will, and if arrested it will pay for a better camera and a better way of life
This little man with a camera is obviously someone who failed to get into the police himself and has a grudge as a result, policing is a hard enough job as it is without idiots like you making a pastime of bating law enforcement, go and do something useful like some charity work for the needy or something.
I totally agree.
No the police should learn the law and stop being bully’s.
You sound like a policeman or someone who failed to get into the police. No law is being broken so what is the problem.
I wouldn't say it's baiting them they should know it's a legal activity and something they shouldn't waste there time with if it was hostile surveillance they wouldn't be so obvious would more like hiding in a bush
He's a law abiding citizen he can do what he wants without giving his details to brown shirts
If the policeman thinks it’s “anti police” to stand up for your rights, that says more about him than you...
Typical pig, if you don't slavishly bow down and kiss the boot you are a troublemaker and anti-cop
Police hate transparency
"Why are you being obnoxious [while I'm trying to violate you rights]" ???????
I think a lot more photographers should decend upon that same PUBLIC FOOTPATH just to prove that it is legal.
"You're not detained but I'm going to stop you leaving while we find out if we have legal grounds to detain you"
Clever bunch.
Notice that Mr. Crewcut said, "but if things are escalated....." Who said anything about escalation but the cop?
I thought asking for ID was suspicious
I did not know that you must have permission from the police. what crime have I committed WALT DISNEY police academy
Thinking the same myself so he was detained because he didn’t state it he should have just carried on
How does giving your name to security/police change anything? They always ask for ID 'just to check you out' but you could still have malicious intent. It's very hard to film anywhere anymore.
Those cops acted disgracefully. Full of aggression and on a power trip. Totally unprofessional. Had to walk away with their tails between their legs. Made themselves a laughing stock for all to see. I despair.
They just can't compute it when people stand up to their idle threats
So upholding your rights makes you "anti police"?
That meaning police must be about violating your rights...
Yep sounds about right.
Makes you wonder if there anti public ?
@@pauldrakeley7647 They are, they demonstrate that every day. The way they talk to people no wonder people dislike them so much. A total disgrace.
Absolutely spot onn with this comment
Problem with cops is they can't bare to lose face, by backing down, They need to show their powers and win all conflicts.
Spelt bear wrong
@@kennykewn5182 He can spell it how it wants!
@@hearmenow909 ah no, he can't!
@@kennykewn5182 Maybe he's dyslexic, would you excuse him then?!
@@hearmenow909 course I would, I'm a grammar nazi, not a monster!!🤪
The police’s attitude makes my blood boil
Tyrant: “You need permission!”
Citizen: “No I don’t.”
Tyrant: “But you could be a terrorist!”
Citizen: “They don’t need permission either 😐”
then flip it on them a terrorist be working in there for ur more fucked
Gives him his name.
Checks it on computer. Computer comes back with nothing.
Contacts mystic meg,. Mystic meg comes back with nothing.
Must not be a terrorist then.
Contacts Russell G. Star sign says he was going to meet someone important today.
The first sign that the police don't have any authority to detain you is when they start accusing you of not talking to them very nicely
The Police were appalling here. Couldn’t cite any crime, refused to tell you if you were detained, a barrage of intrusive questions. Terrible.
It's not that the Coppers are worried about the Airport suffering terrorist attack; it's that they are Coppers, and they are being defied. They didn't join the Police Force to have members of the Public winning arguments with them; they joined to push people about, which they would be unable to do without the uniform.
I would not say 100% of coppers are like that, but it seems that you are getting more and more spot on as time goes by.
And they are also the same folk making it safe for you folk to fly. Think about it!!! Idiot!!!
Ray Whitworth this doesn’t just happen at airports pal, this is happening everywhere. The police just don’t like losing arguments because they’re all full of ego, they join the ‘force’ to harass and push people around not to be told what’s right and wrong by the public. So called public servants.
@@raywhitworth7444 How does acting outside of their powers achieve anything but distract them from their proper and lawful duties duties?
@@raywhitworth7444 says idiot
The 3 cops were so argumentative to try and show they are in charge
Tell them BOLLOCKS
Repeat tell them BOLLOCKS....that's all...Remember, tell them BOLLOCKS.
They weren't cops. They were PCSO's which ruin the image for the PC's
That would get arrested for obscene language and that's their ploy ,to get you rattled . But this time the shoe was on the other foot
Yep. Tell them to go fúck themselves. Let them falsely detain, arrest and lock you up. Then throw the book at them, report them to IPCC and professional standards. Lodge a civil case.
The police are employed by LEICESTERSHIRE CONSTABULARY so they are not PCSO. You need permission from EMA
Just shows how “BUSY” the 🐖🐖🐖 are these days, 6-7 of them for somebody filming with a camera.. yet my Nan had to wait alone for hours when her house got robbed... seems about right..
According to G4s and a few thick coppers, terrorists apparently go around with a camera crew...
And suspiciously use a PUBLIC FOOTPATH...
"But you can't stereotypy somebody " and yet she has done, comedy gold.
That's what I said to her lol
The cops in the UK are more polite than they are here in the USA but they are just as ignorant
Spot on to true
Yeah it's tripe alright ....you can film anything you like from a public place and you don't need ANYONE'S permission but a 10 buck an hour security guard probably wouldn't know that and doesn't even appear to know they have no right's past the gate entrance to their facility
Yes, very true.....
Yes its becoming a proplem
"Have I committed a crime?" "I've said my piece and now I'm going to take your details". These idiots love operating with ambiguity to confuse you into giving up your rights.
What a bunch of bell ends I'm in security industry for over 10 years this is an embarrassment
Sam King why do the police not try to learn the law ? Fucking parasites
'Am I being detained?'
'Well we'll know in about 10 seconds' *whilst blocking path, effectively detaining them*
"You're clearly anti-police" because you should be asking permission to do something you don't need permission for...
lecu1967 hahah
lecu1967 hahah
"You're clearly anti-police" because you should be asking for different permission to the one you obtained because we have just revoked that permission and you now need permission from a manager to do something you never needed permission for in the first place
Again should be using Buckingham Palace as the perfect example.... surely if you can take photos of Buckingham Palace then you can photograph a DHL building..
Not according to Rent-a-gob
Pleb , Buckingham palace has security tighter than a nuns fanny . Take as many pictures as you want . Just try to climb over the fence and see what happens . It's a totally different situation.
@ They were not 'climbing over a fence'. Please stick to relevant comments.
scott fulton didn’t someone get in the Queens bedroom 35 years ago?
@ I shagged a nun once and she had a fanny like a bucket. It cost a fortune but the agency assured me she was a genuine nun.
“Why are you being difficult, i just wanna ban you from ever coming to this airport”
😂😂😂jokers
Judge: "Officer, why did you detain, demand details, threaten to arrest and ban these people from the airport?" Officer: "They were taking pictures and video legally in a public place!" Judge: "Case dismissed, damages awarded." Plane spotters have been taking pictures for decades of planes and other things of interest around airports and people take pictures in the terminal of the planes and other passengers all the time on their phones, what is the big problem? And it is highly unlikely that terrorists would be so blatantly obvious if they wanted to surveillance the airport with obvious photographer uniforms and completely in the open.
The police would never be able to reconcile that train of thought, they have their authority and are going to act upon it, even if it is illegal for them to do so, time for individual officers to be held fully accountable for their actions.
Police officers seem to forget they are public servants
Pissoffprick
It is a public right of way, there is a public bus route on the road. And there is an assumed right of way by it being open to the public without restriction. And of course the sergeant of the airport police station should really know the byelaws of the airport and surrounding areas isn't that in fact his job?
Its private its owned by MAG the roads, the paths,are private,DHL own their land having bought it.the area ahead it the main gatehouse for DHL, and for deliveries via the landside areas of EMA
"Guy takes one step towards woman"
"GET OUT OF MY SPACE WITH YOUR THREATENING BEHAVIOUR"
Hilarious...
That was pathetic of her. Bet she loves to play the victim in life, I've met that type before.
If its private property then it would be up to the property owner to decide, but as the police identified its a public right of way then these two guys being members of the public are being lawful, they even went out of their way to get some confirmation via email before they made their visit. How more upstanding can you get. These guys are just going about their hobby and being harassed by the filth
If chimpanzees could talk, you'd have this same "conversation."
Hey Sam chimps are highly intelligent if you dont mind
But with more intelligent answers.
Matt: Which part of PACE says I have to give you my details! Which part of PACE says I have to give you my details! Which part of PACE says I have to give you my details! - Just keep asking Matt!
Rent-a-gob "I don't care about the law"
Wonder if she put that on her CV when she applied at G4S
Whatever she's getting paid is way too much!
@@NBMedia8928 Aint G4S the prime ministers husbands corrupt company or had some dodgy shares in it.
So we're led to believe
Have some sympathy, she needs to get laid.
@@coolbreez773 Is there a man out there brave enough to give that horror 1? Even her vibrator killed it's battery so she could not use it.
Difficult my arse, it only becomes difficult when you are aware of your rights..
Do you know all the airport bylaws as its private property.
@@patrickwatters7555 we weren't stood on private property that's the difference
Again!! 16mins in and the copper says you don't have to give me your name at the moment.., but if we escalate things then you will lol
You have to be given the opportunity to leave before you can be criminally trespassed. You were quite happy to leave so not sure what the issue is.
You not obligated to ID because you have not committed a crime.
You not obligated to show them your pictures.. they cannot delete your photographs and they require a court order to view them.
I've had dealings with G4S before and boy, they don't half employ some thickos. They must have to pass a stupidity exam to get a job with G4S :)))))
The amount of time and resources wasted just to try and jamb up and ban 2 photographers in mind boggling. Really uncalled for.
What about the time and effort of two perfectly able people who's sole effort is to jam up the time of individuals at work, just to get some footage for RUclips?
Jollys Heldone I see your point but you have to understand that as much as it may look like they’re doing it to disrupt the services, it is totally legal to record from a public space, and the police and other services need to understand that and stop wasting their time on trying to enforce ‘acts’ or ‘laws’ that don’t exist. The police SHOULD know the law and because they don’t, that’s actually what is wasting their time, when they could just ignore the photographers!
@@jollysheldone425 nobody forced the guard to leave there property
Jollys Heldone what a completely stupid comment
@@jollysheldone425 They were acting ultra vires.
Haha..."without your details we cant ban you from the airport"...see ya then next week Muppet lol!!!
Doug Blue 😂
That woman airport security worker was vicious as hell!
Imagine being married to here with five little scrotes lad!
“I will get ratty if I want to get ratty” 🤣🤣🤣 I’ll throw my dummy out of the pram when ever I want to 🤣😭😭😭 knob
09:07 GET OUT OF MAH PERSONAL SPAYCE! MAH PURSONAL SPAAAAYCE!
What a boot..give her a slap 😂😂
Wow, I didn't know Waynetta Slob was working for DHL.
Lol, "Wayne? Where's the baby?"´ "He's in the boot( trunk if in USA) with the pizza!" Spot on East field!
ha nice one
Good one!
Excellent!
😂😂😂🤣🤣
'There's a public footpath sign over there, do you want to come and look at it?' Cue the tumbleweed as the copper walks away in total silence , because he knows he will be proven wrong! Surely it's their job to establish the facts to determine if they are within the law, and not checking the sign is a neglect of duty.
It is their duty to operate within the law not bullshit people into thinking that they have powers that they do not have.
The second line of their oath is 'with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people' and the final part states, 'I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.'
It doesn't say that they can dream laws up.
Unbelievable....those last cops were determined! To make a fool of themselves 😂😂no wonder crime is on the rise 🤔
They'll stoop to all sorts of levels
They are so eager to show the world how rude and ignorant they are.
“If I can’t get your details, I can’t ban you from the airport”😂
"You could be a terroist"
"Anybody can be a terrorist"
"You cant just stereotype"
3 statements back to back in just 5 seconds. WOW.
"your not obliged to give your ID"
"I don't get why if you got nothing to hide, you just give your ID"
just forget what the first statement means
thick as a plank of wood
And the police wonder why people are becoming anti police with attitudes like that
So at the end, the cop says you're free to go, and then says: but the manager of the airport says you've got no permission to come back on airport land taking photos.
You were on a public footpath, so surely you can come back to that footpath and take pictures anytime you like, with or without the permission of the manager?
Spot on lol
Banned from the airport for taking pictures on a public footpath... seems fair treatment
Airport owns the land so technically it is private land
Harry Bowler Under British law, private land does not trump “right of way” unless said “right of way” has not been used for 7 year”, end of!
@@harrybowler4681 Private land can have public rights of way or BOATs running across them, and it is impossible to prevent members of the public from enjoying such rights.
@@harrybowler4681 since when did airports become private property?
I am a pilot and what these people are saying about "AvIaTiOn LaWs" is absolute tripe.
Ok you are not a pilot and dont try to make yourself sound like one you look about 17 on your channel maybe younger however yes I can agree with you the aviation laws is "absolute tripe"😂
Youre 14
FlannelDriver don’t know if that was aimed towards me or him but 😂
@@alphadeltaaviation812 Sorry to him, it was aimed at the kid. He even says in his video that hes 14 lol
@@alphadeltaaviation812 in the uk you have to be 17 to gain a pilot's licence, there is no legal age limit to begin flight training
10:00 can you photograph the airplanes for your collectors book ? Is that banned these days and is a section 43.
You both stay very calm and urban looked like he was a good meter from mouth almighty cant see how he was in her personal space. Great video take care
That scruff bird needs to go and get an education.
...and also go to the hairdressers and the beautitions
"Why can't you be polite, mate, and say, 'Here's my ID, here are my papers, here's me bum so you can put a scope up it."?
👍👍 👍👍 Nice One !!!
16:55 That is the reason you record all interactions with police becuase there ego can take charge in seconds.
It is clearly not privite land based on the fact that there are council lighting near the footpath as well as a foot path with no clear instruction of land boundrys.
This is an illegal stop and it also classed as an infringment of human rights freedom of expression and freedom of media. When police say your beaing problematic it basically means your exercising your rights under the law.
Why is it Security companies insist on employing staff with the intelligence of earthworms?
😂😂😂 That's a bit of an insult to earthworms
100's maybe 1000's of Photographers should meet up at this and other airports!
Why?to make more trouble for working people,, grow up idiot,
Yes, Brian Dunstan, to make as much trouble as is needed to grind home the point they have the Right to Photograph.
They didn't need that special letter to prove anything.
Notice that female was quick to scream "personal space" ?
THAT is exactly what these photographers should have done.
"You are invading my personal space. Back off or be charged with assault".
The more "trouble", the quicker this em-passe will be resolved. Maybe draw the medias attention if lucky.
The idiot is you, worried about upsetting "working" security people who should know the law better, and butt out.
@@Kinarr. There was a female in this vid? LOL
Now this is where things get a bit grey,, you have to be careful not be inciting trouble or things along that line... But your on the right track, just maybe call it by another name.
@@kellyhunt3958 No. That is the point I am making. "Disturbing the peace" & " Hate Speech" are BAD Leftist laws that must be removed, and this is the way to start.
I feel bad for the baldy. I bet he is still asking from his wife WHY??? LOL 😂
Nosey "Is this a public right of way?" ...no answer.
Nosey "What's the security risk here?" ...no answer.
Nosey "Is this part of East Midlands Airport?" ...no answer.
Security "you are not taking pictures of that building"
These 'security' are so funny. They know so little of the law or of security, they end up drawing more attention to the building than if they'd just left you alone 😂
Exercise your rights and you're awkward? That pig had a massive vendetta. This is why people hate the police more and more now
The old man cop changed his tone when he realised he was being filmed.
security ha couldnt secure a custard tart in a bakery lad
Upsetting that airport police do not know the bye-laws.I wonder!!!
Insane ! I go to RAF bases and film planes with no problem.
You can’t film at an airport???. WTF!?!? Better get ready to arrest every Chinese tourist going through Heathrow airport!
When "the law" doesn't know the law 😂😂😂
“What guessing games you playing ?” Comedy gold 😂😂
Just gone on Google street you can see all the buildings ect what a bunch off clowns DHL and police are 🤣🤣😋🤣😋😋
Have you checked it out
DHL deliver petrol to sainbury that why you get diesel mixed in with unleaded there thicko drivers
Ye google earth shows you all of it
Then why don’t you stay at home and use google earth you douché
@muskyERA it's e.t.c. learn to spell,,,etc you thick prick,,
Thick staff, Go back to work.. my parcel is now late!!
Well done photographers standing up for your fights and Every members of the public's rights as well . Amazing how many cops turn up but when you need one , where are they ? Others that disagree are cop-suckers .
30 mph speed limit sign in last 10 secs of video.... red ringed? Is that not a national speed limit sign? If so the road is open to public an must have a publicly accessible footpath?
Its nit a public right away refusal can be made, its monitored by cameras, ANPR
If you don't want people not to take photographs or video what is not legal to take photographs or video then build a wall around it.
Another puppet for the corporate vultures.
And that female is so rude and needs a lesson in manners.
Rag Rag she was probably brought up by single mun
She reminds me of that gobby old bitch at the golden wonder factory
The inevitable oyster the monty python sketch!
Rag Rag was that a female?
A slap
Did that copper go through your phone and pull it away when you reached for it.
That really got my blood boiling.
The camera have become the plods enemy. Frankenstein has turned on its master.
Standing on your rights is not being difficult or obstuctive
Thanks for standing up for our rights.
If you never had a camera recording in situations like this there would be one outcome,arrested and up in court
This is a prime example of why they pay security peanuts. Little in the way of brain cells.
It’s security mate. It’s security mate. It’s security mate
The last time I checked, a police officer serves the public, and airports employ their own security. Police have no rights policing a private company, its trespass and that is a civil matter.
These are cops who hate people exercising their rihts
Ha the mouthiest cop was far more difficult in his questions by far than the photographers. Classic reversal of blame
It's nice to see DHL are an equal opportunity employer! Ah bless em, ✌🏼️
He has a cheek asking a growen man to tell him what his friends name is. Thats cops for you always useing low handed tactic.
Then they go home and sleep well at night.
"Get your mouth out of my ears!" haha, I laughed too hard at that.
There is a viewing area in the airport where you can take as many pictures as you want. Yet to stand outside is no acceptable ha ha what a joke
G4S do make me laugh, no professionalism whatsoever,handbag and coat over the shoulder. Bloody tart.
you are arguing with 'people' who are completely devoid of critical thinking.. they are like mindless 1980s computers :(
reakingringpiece don’t insult the zx81
Don't say that top my Amiga!
Nooo my beautiful IBM 5150 is very clever!
I’m not quite sure why the sergeant thinks he can talk to members of the public in that way. The police are very unprofessional in their interaction here. Very poor.
7:40 Waynetta Slob! - Upset that she never got a Brown Baby!
What I gather from a lot of these videos is the role of the police in this, are they glorified security guards now?
And revenue collectors for the corporations.
Well they got your name from the email, got you banned from the airport and managed to move you on. Looks like the police won this round, I also noticed you kept saying you had permission? You don't need permission you should've just stood where you took the photos and stayed there
If you have any understanding of aviation security, photographs of any building or aviation site are prohibited for security due to a photograph of a building could be used in a terrorist attack. Mobile phones are prohibited when working in and around the buildings unless you are granted access to do so
@@purplemonkey4442 it doesn't matter what security policy is - it never trumps the law of the land. If you are on public property then you can film anything you can see.
@@purplemonkey4442 God you're stupid. You need to report google while you're at it.
www.google.com/maps/@52.8243017,-1.34691,3a,75y,342.81h,87.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTjEnd3cM1gYpT7ksZc7Wnw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Not really, the police wanted their details and failed to acquire them. Therefore the photographers won the round. You can clearly tell they weren't there for any actual photography, most of these audits aren't there for photography but to troll the police when they try to acquire about their actual business.
@@mjb1957uk so if your at home and someone is recording your children in your home at any time of the day while on public property thats perfectly fine??
Why don’t the security guard’s go back we’re thay work instead of wondering rond the streets thinking thay work everywhere
G4S bottom feeders that's why
Legend has it, the bald thug is stood there still asking 'Why you taking pictures of this building?'
*Some trucks, a warehouse, and a loading bay*
These guys: This cannot be photographed at all costs.
As a Security Officer with 18 Years of Experience take it from Me that some people are simply not worth talking too, because no matter what you say they are not Listening and simply want to be Argumentative.
Until someone is actually prepared to Arrest you, no one is worth Arguing with.
It's like you are bored with life and intentionally go out looking for trouble because you believe you know the Law and the camera protects you in your mind.
David Smith agreed! Muppets!
Strange how its only the ones with fake user accounts that make dissenting comments!
@@shush_ya_mush ... What ever makes you happy chappy . With you're 2 subscribers I'm sure you might reach 10 by 2025.
@@DavidSmith-dv7ih 2 more than you then, but then its not about me. Keep firing, you never know, one day you may hit something, even though your insults are as lame as your spelling and punctuation. Clearly you have the courage of your convictions!
i hate the police when they act like this, no crime walk away do not talk to them and do not say anything to them without a solicitor. i know i never will, and if arrested it will pay for a better camera and a better way of life
And yet for some reason racial profiling is considered wrong.