The bar chart illustrates how many shirts were sold by three English football clubs between 2000 and 2003. Overall, the number of shirts sold by Leads saw a remarkable decline during this period, while Chelsea significantly increased its income from shirt sales. It is also clear that the number of shirts sold by Liverpool remained relatively unchanged, despite small fluctuations.
Overall, what can be deduced from the graph is that while Chelsea sleadily increased thoughout the timeline, Leeds underwent an opposite movement. Moreover, unlike Chelsea and Leeds, Liverpool kept relatively steady, though with minor fluctuations.
Task 1: Overall, the numbers of attendance at Chelsea Stadium was increasing consistently over the period as opposed to Leeds Stadium, the number of attendance had fallen significantly during the period. Attendance numbers of Liverpool had many fluctuations although the numbers didn't change a lot at the first of the period in comparison with the end of the period.
In overview, Leeds had a downward trend in the amount of shirts sold and on the contrary, the number of shirts sold skyrocketed for Chelsea, while Liverpool experienced a fluctuation in the amount of shirts sold over the years.
As graph depicts, in contrast to Leeds, which experienced sharp decrease, Chelsea had steady increase in sales figures. However, Liverpool's figures stayed relatively the same with slight fluctuations throughout the whole timeline.
Task 2. Overall, Chelsea had a steady increase in the sales of shirts while Leeds experienced a sharp decline over the given time period. On the other hand, Liverpool had varying fluctuations in sales within the time period..
Chris you are a super amazing teacher! Since I am watching your channel, I am no more scared about writing at all which was once my biggest fear of all time. Thanks would not be enough to show my gratitude. Just keep doing this good work.
As table demonstrates, contrary to Leeds football club, which had sharp decline in the figures, Chelsea kept spending more and more on transfers of football players. Although with some fluctuations, Liverpool also experienced a steady increase in sales figures.
The line graph shows changing trends in the attendance rate of three English football clubs from 2000 to 2008. Overall, Liverpool generally had the highest attendance level during this period. It is also clear that Chelsea increased its figure significantly, while Leads saw a notable decline in the number of fans attending its stadium.
As for table, Liverpool saw a slight increase in expenditure on transfers, while Chelsea spent dramatically more throughout the period. Unlike these two clubs, Leeds spent much less than them by the end of the timeline , despite leading in the beginning.
Overall , it is lucid from the chart that Chelsea witnessed a steady rise in number of attendants at the stadium while the figures for Leeds fell drastically from being highest to dropping to lowest. Moreover, the count for Liverpool hovered at almost same value.
This was very helpful! Thank you so much! I have always been anxious about writing and writing task 1 but now I have more confidence in myself. I will use the materials you recommend and try and improve my writing 😊
You're welcome. Glad we're able to help. If you have any questions or need our team of IELTS teachers to help you prepare for your exam, please feel free to contact us.
The line graph provides information about the number of spectators at three football stadiums over the period from 2000 to 2008. Overall, the attendance of the audience rose significantly in chelsea, while the number showed considerable decline at leeds stadium in the following years. Despite some fluctuations in trend, attendence at Liverpool stadium remained constant throughout the same time.
Overall, Chelsea's expenditure on transfers dramatically increased,whereas leeds experienced a significant decline by the end of the period. However, liverpool had a slight increase eventhough it accounted some fluctuations in between.
The number of attendance in leeds decline stedily throughout the period but significantly increased in chesla. Liverpool attendance are remain stedily over the tileline but some fluctuations in it.
The line graph illustrates attendance at football stadium from the period of 2000 to 2008. In general, Liverpool maintained a relatively constant attendance through out the session though with little fluctuations. However, Chelsea experienced a continuous increase in availability of fans while Liverpool had a significant decline across all years.
The chart shows the amount of attendance to the football stadiums in countries Liverpool, Chelsea and leads. However it is obvious that Liverpool stadiums's attendance are almost the same over the years with slightly some small changes while leads in 2000 was in the peak but with time it goes down rapidly.
Chelsea football ground attendance elevated sharply over the time period, while the attendance at Leeds stadium declined dramatically and the fluctuations were seen at Liverpool ground.
Overall,the amount of Leeds shirt sold started at a higher rate in the first year,comparing it with the other teams but throughout the time period it dramatically increased whereas Chelsea shirts began selling at a lower rate but reached the top in the final period. However,Liverpools selling rate remained stable all throughout.
The line graph illustrates frequency of attending soccer stadiums during 2000-2018. To begin with, there is a markable contrast between indexes of Chelsea and Leeds over this period. The Chelsea had a significant growth in attendance, whereas Leeds plunged by under 60 thousands until the end of 2018. Furthermore, it is observed a marginal variation of Liverpool's figure and was remained stable within 18 years.
The bar chart displays how many shirts were sold by three English clubs. Overall, it can be clearly seen that there has been fluctuations in sales with Leeds falling down dramatically and Chelsea risings sales sharply throughout the period. Liverpool was the only one that stayed slightly stable from beginning to the end.
Liverpool fan attendance remains on the same level throughout the year, while Chelsea club recently is raising it's popularity. Unfortunately can not say the same about Leeds, that drops in attendance drastically
Overall,the attendance for the Leeds team started at a higher peak but gradually declined throughout the years whereas Chelsea dramatically increased within the time period. However,the Liverpool attendance rate remained stable all throughout even with little fluctuations.
Overall, it can be seen that whereas Liverpool maintained a high level of attendance at football stadiums, Leeds which began at a high level of attendance fell over the course of the years. Furthermore, although Chelsea began at a low level of attendance at football stadiums, they went on to increase in attendance over the years
Overall Leeds had by far the highest number of shirts sold in 2000 and suffered a decline in the numbers from 2001 up until 2003 with the lowest figures. In contrast, Chelsea which had the least number of shirts sold in 2000, however had a peak from 2001 up to 2003. Liverpool had the fewest number of shirts sold in 2000 and maintained a steady number throughout the years up to 2003
Overall, the table gives the expenditure by each club though transfer.Leeds had a decreasing flow from the given time whereas, Liverpool increased. Chelsea's figures flutauated from 2000 reaching the highest in 2006
The graphic illustrates the number of people watch football match in the stadium between Leeds, Chelsea, and Liverpool from 2000 to 2018. Overall, the data shows that Chelsea has the increasing numbers of supporters while Leeds is decreasing over period of time. However, Liverpool displays as the highest number of people who attend to watch the football competition with a small fluctuation
The graph clearly shows that the number of jersey's sold by the Leeds club has decreased steadily over the years, while those sold by Chelsea has increased. The Liverpool Club, however, kept a constant sale of shirts.
It is clear from the graph that Liverpool has the most attendance from the start to end with some fluctuations. Whereas, Leeds attendance dropped significantly and went down steadily till the end. Chelsea rocketed over time.
Overall, the attendance of Liverpool was an insignificant rise and fall just around the same level, while Chelsea grew steadily to the top from 2000 to 2018. Leeds, on the other hand, continously decreased slowly to a point, after which, we saw a rather insignificant decrease again.
From the graph it is clear that the audience turnout for Chelsea has increased steadily from the year 2000 to 2018, while Leeds saw an opposite trend over the period. Liverpool, however, kept pretty much a steady attendance, with minor fluctuations though.
The graph represents the number of shirts sold by three distinct football clubs from the year 2000 to 2008. Overall, leads experienced a continuous decline in quantities of shirts sold over the years while that of Chelsea steadily increased. However, leads performance in the past years was significant. Liverpool encountered little changes in sales across the timeline.
the table illustrates that Chelsea increased the amount from 9.2 million to 121.7 million while Leeds faced a decline from 111.1 to 5.8 million pounds, throughout the years from 2000 to 2006. Liverpool maintained a constant value, around 26.5 million, with minor fluctuations.
Task 2. Overall Chelsea and Leeds Experienced a greater rise and fall respectively in selling shirts over the given period whereas Liverpool remains consistent with little fluctuation through out the given period .
The given chart depicts;Ration of individuals visited Chelsea grew up dramatically Nonetheless the persons quantity who visited Leeds dropped to the bottom
You are simply incredible , and incredibly simple....Please Chris do post the link of pdf . Your every word and every suggestion means to me alot...Thank you so much for your support.
To start with, the attendance level at Leeds declined throughout the period while the attendance level at Chelsea increased and Liverpool remained around the top with fluctuating attendance.
Overall, there has been a significant increase in the number of people watching football matches at Chelsea over these period. Once popular Leeds stadium showed a major plummet in the football audience count recently. The stadium in Liverpool has steadily maintained its football enthusiasts crowd with slight fluctuations in between.
1. Liverpool fluctuates over the period and hold highest position in 2018. 2. Chelsea was jumped throughout the period and crossed the Leeds in the middle of the time duration. 3. Leeds was on a first position and it was drastically declined observed in the following period.
Its clearly seen that, though with minor fluctuations, most of the time the largest segment of population visited liverpool stadium. On one hand, in over a decade period of time, there is an obvious discrepancy between the proportions of Chelsea and leads’ goers. However, around 2004,the percentages of the two football stadiums attendees crossover.
Chelsea has a significant rise throughout the period, while leads showed dip declined although it had the highest number of attendance at initial period. In comparison, Liverpool had some fluctuation from beginning and still continues to the end of the period.
The line graphic shows the attendance of football fans in the stadium from year 2000 to 2028. The attendance of fans at Liverpool matches was steady and high all through to 2018. The attendance of fans at Chelsea matches steadily increased all through the year. The attendance of fans at the Leeds football club steadily experienced a decline all through the years
Overall, the attendance at Liverpool and Chelsea were higher, with the exception of Leeds. Despite, the attendance at liverpool and leeds football stadium was just under and over 60% in 2000, however, attendance at leeds dramatically fall more than halving to around 20% in mid twenties and ending to roughly 10% in 2018, whereas liverpool after fluctuation remain stabilised near to 60% since early 2018. On the other hand, attendees at Chelsea, although stared at 0% in 2000, it overtook Leeds and surged to below 60% over the period.
Overall, it is evident that when it comes to the amount of transport expenditures, Chelsea increased significantly, and Leeds decreased substantially. However, Liverpool fluctuated a little but stayed the same all thoughout the 7 year period.
Liverpool's presence at football stadium remains constant at near about sixty thousand from the year 2000 to 2018. In the meantime, Chelsea's climbed up constantly from zero to almost sixty thousand. On the contrary, the appearance of Leeds plunged down from sixty thousand to next to nothing in the same span of time.
In overview, the attendance at Liverpool stadium fluctuates throughout the years and at Chelsea football stadium, attendance experienced an exponential growth through the years while a deep fall was observed at Leeds football stadium.
task 1 This graph protrays the increase and decrease of audience for a football match from the year 2000-2008.The first thing that one see's when looking at the graph is that liverpool has had a consistent number of audience with slight increase and decrease over the years.in the second case , Chelsea has increased their audience from 0 in the 2000s to nearly a 60 k in 2018.This signifies their rising popularity.The third case , the Leeds, has experienced a huge decrease in popularity with almost zero audience members in 2018.Overall Chelsea is going soaring while Leeds is plummeting,at the same time , the liverpool is going at the same pace.
To summarize, Liverpool spend much money than others, the money spent by Chelsea was almost same over the all period at the same time Leeds tried to reduce the amount of spends by years.
Overall, in a given time period, Chelsea emerged as the top spender in terms of transfers, followed by Chelsea whilst Leeds was the least spender among all the three clubs.
Overall, The line graph clearly illustrates a substantial rise in visitors numbers in Chelsea with a steady drop in Leeds spectators with a slight plateau over a span of eight years. However, the numbers showed a constant trend with slight fluctuations for Liverpool during the entire span. The tabulated data showed the similar trend corresponds for the sales of shirts and overall expenditure on three football teams namely Chelsae, Leeds and Liverpool.
The table shows that Liverpool's expenditure on players has remained quite stable over the seven year period. Chelsea's spending, however, has increased drastically over time, while Leeds cut down its costs on transfers.
As it can seen from the graph that Chelsea had spent great amount of money on transfers. Meanwhile, Leeds spent the most money on their transfers as a second team. Furthermore, Liverpool spent less money in compare to other two teams.
The number of people that visited Liverpool football stadium fluctuates but remains steady over the years, while in Leeds, the number of those who visited dropped drastically and the numbers of those who visited Chelsea increased gradually over the years
Overall, the attendance for Liverpool fluctuated but stayed remained unchanged while lead attendance declined .Chelsea attendance increased steadily throughout the time period.
Overall, the presence off people at Chelsea escalated with the passage of time though it did not have an appreciated inceptive outlook. Furthermore, it is also evident that the number of people in Liverpool fluctuated in a continuous manner as compared to Leeds, which had a negative attendance of people by the end of the period.
Task 1. Overall, Chelsea recorded a significant increase in attendance while Leeds experienced a drastic decline over the given time period. However, with varying fluctuations, Liverpool maintained the highest number of attendees....
The graph depicts the fan following of three clubs chelsea, liverpool and leeds. It can be seen that the popularity of chelsea is seen to be growing whereas that of leeds can be seen to be dropping. Liverpool has had a constant fan following over the years.
Overall, it can been clearly seen that sales of leeds club t shirts declined in the given period whereas chelsea's rose significantly. A fluctuation is seen in liverpools sales
Overall, Chelsa's shirt sales increased throughout the given period. Despite the number of shirts sold by leeds witnessed a steady decrease up to final years. Liverpool's sales fluctuated between 2000 and 2003.
Overall, Chelsea's total attendance increased throughout the given period. Despite the Leeds went the opposite direction. The Liverpool attendance fluctuated between 2000 and 2018.
Overall, Leeds filed the highest number of attendants at the initial periods then after a gradual reduction in the numbers towards the end of years. On the other hand, Chelsea recorded the least subscribers at the beginning and an accelerated growth towards the end periods. However, Liverpool maintain the highest growth and fluctuates throughout the years but Leeds as a team documented a same level of growth with each team at a particular year period.
Overall, Liverpool had the highest sale of shirts in 2000 and the lowest in 2003, as opposed to Chelsea, which sold most shirts in 2003 and the least sales in 2000. Leeds however, sold about the same quantities throughout the 4 years.
Overall the Leeds popularity lagged behind the Liverpool and chelson. Eventhough the Liverpool as well as chelson popular yet Liverpool is the most famous one.
Overall, attendance at Liverpool’s stadium increased between the periods that goes from 2001 to 2018, on the other hand it can be seen that the attendance of Chelsea’s fans increased and the attendance of Leeds’ fans decreased over the years.
Overall, Liverpool had oscillated throughout 18 years whereas Chelsea had a sharply inflated, and Leeds had rapidly fallen but from about 6 years it descended slowly.
Overall, The line graph illustrates an increasing pattern in football attendance by Chelsea fans from 2000 to 2008 while it's fluctuating by Liverpool fans. However Leeds fans had a decline which progressed drastically all through the years.
The table shows that the money spent on transfers in Leeds club showed a steady decline through the years, whereas the money spent on transfers in Chelsea club shows a steady increase in amount throughout the years. Finally, the money spent on transfers in Liverpool club shows a constant spending with only minimal changes throughout the years
Overall ,Liverpool had a significant fluctuation with the highest number of people between the year 2000 to 2018. In contrast the number of people in Chelsea rose sharply from the year 2000 to 2018.
Overall,clearly, number of attendees of Liverpool club fluctuated throughout the given period, while two other football clubs namely, Chelsea and Leeds saw a gradual and significant upward and downward trends respectively.Remarkably, Leeds attendance rate become the lowest by the end of the period despite having a considerable following in the beginning.
Overall, the money spent on players in the Liverpool team recorded a fluctuation and a dramatic increase in transfers for Chelsa's players, and Liverpool transfers receded throughout the given period.
1. football club attendance in Liverpool experienced flactuation period 2. Number of Chelsea club members increased dramatically 3. There was a period of sharp decrease in Leeds attendance
1. Overall the attendance of Liverpool remained the highest and it had very minimal fluctuations. While the attendance at Chelsa stadium experienced a steep escalation in the number of people attending. Contradicting to this, the stadium of Leeds which initially had a higher number of attendance experienced a significant downfall. 2. Overall the number of shirts sold in Leeds was the highest in the beginning, Meanwhile the number of shirts sold in Liverpool remained almost constant throughout the year, whereas the sale of shirts in the Chelsa stadium grew steadily. 3. Overall there has been an increase in the money spent on transfers by Liverpool and Chelsa stadium but the amount of money spent on transfers by Leeds stadium has decreased significantly.
Let me know your answers to the task in the comments and don't forget to subscribe for more lessons like this!
i need pdf"please put the link of pdf"
Thanks Chris! I never saw graphs that way.. Task 1 is always my problem.. Like how to analyze and choose key features.. ❤️
Chris I want the PDF please. it was great.
@2:19 from 2000 to 2018 : Liverpool - stable ; Chelsea - rise ; Leeds - decline
3:40 between 2000 and 2003 : Liverpool - unchanged ; Leeds - decreased ; Chelsea - increased. Most sales - Leeds in 2000
The bar chart illustrates how many shirts were sold by three English football clubs between 2000 and 2003. Overall, the number of shirts sold by Leads saw a remarkable decline during this period, while Chelsea significantly increased its income from shirt sales. It is also clear that the number of shirts sold by Liverpool remained relatively unchanged, despite small fluctuations.
Overall, what can be deduced from the graph is that while Chelsea sleadily increased thoughout the timeline, Leeds underwent an opposite movement. Moreover, unlike Chelsea and Leeds, Liverpool kept relatively steady, though with minor fluctuations.
You made two perfect comparisons!
Task 1:
Overall, the numbers of attendance at Chelsea Stadium was increasing consistently over the period as opposed to Leeds Stadium, the number of attendance had fallen significantly during the period. Attendance numbers of Liverpool had many fluctuations although the numbers didn't change a lot at the first of the period in comparison with the end of the period.
In overview, Leeds had a downward trend in the amount of shirts sold and on the contrary, the number of shirts sold skyrocketed for Chelsea, while Liverpool experienced a fluctuation in the amount of shirts sold over the years.
As graph depicts, in contrast to Leeds, which experienced sharp decrease, Chelsea had steady increase in sales figures. However, Liverpool's figures stayed relatively the same with slight fluctuations throughout the whole timeline.
Task 2.
Overall, Chelsea had a steady increase in the sales of shirts while Leeds experienced a sharp decline over the given time period. On the other hand, Liverpool had varying fluctuations in sales within the time period..
Chris you are a super amazing teacher! Since I am watching your channel, I am no more scared about writing at all which was once my biggest fear of all time.
Thanks would not be enough to show my gratitude. Just keep doing this good work.
As table demonstrates, contrary to Leeds football club, which had sharp decline in the figures, Chelsea kept spending more and more on transfers of football players. Although with some fluctuations, Liverpool also experienced a steady increase in sales figures.
The line graph shows changing trends in the attendance rate of three English football clubs from 2000 to 2008. Overall, Liverpool generally had the highest attendance level during this period. It is also clear that Chelsea increased its figure significantly, while Leads saw a notable decline in the number of fans attending its stadium.
As for table, Liverpool saw a slight increase in expenditure on transfers, while Chelsea spent dramatically more throughout the period. Unlike these two clubs, Leeds spent much less than them by the end of the timeline , despite leading in the beginning.
Overall , it is lucid from the chart that Chelsea witnessed a steady rise in number of attendants at the stadium while the figures for Leeds fell drastically from being highest to dropping to lowest. Moreover, the count for Liverpool hovered at almost same value.
This was very helpful! Thank you so much! I have always been anxious about writing and writing task 1 but now I have more confidence in myself. I will use the materials you recommend and try and improve my writing 😊
You're welcome. Glad we're able to help. If you have any questions or need our team of IELTS teachers to help you prepare for your exam, please feel free to contact us.
The line graph provides information about the number of spectators at three football stadiums over the period from 2000 to 2008.
Overall, the attendance of the audience rose significantly in chelsea, while the number showed considerable decline at leeds stadium in the following years. Despite some fluctuations in trend, attendence at Liverpool stadium remained constant throughout the same time.
Overall, Chelsea's expenditure on transfers dramatically increased,whereas leeds experienced a significant decline by the end of the period. However, liverpool had a slight increase eventhough it accounted some fluctuations in between.
I'm writing an IELTS exam tomorrow and this video is an absolute game changer! Thank You
We're always happy to help. Best of luck with your exam.
The number of attendance in leeds decline stedily throughout the period but significantly increased in chesla. Liverpool attendance are remain stedily over the tileline but some fluctuations in it.
The line graph illustrates attendance at football stadium from the period of 2000 to 2008.
In general, Liverpool maintained a relatively constant attendance through out the session though with little fluctuations. However, Chelsea experienced a continuous increase in availability of fans while Liverpool had a significant decline across all years.
The chart shows the amount of attendance to the football stadiums in countries Liverpool, Chelsea and leads. However it is obvious that Liverpool stadiums's attendance are almost the same over the years with slightly some small changes while leads in 2000 was in the peak but with time it goes down rapidly.
Chelsea football ground attendance elevated sharply over the time period, while the attendance at Leeds stadium declined dramatically and the fluctuations were seen at Liverpool ground.
Overall,the amount of Leeds shirt sold started at a higher rate in the first year,comparing it with the other teams but throughout the time period it dramatically increased whereas Chelsea shirts began selling at a lower rate but reached the top in the final period. However,Liverpools selling rate remained stable all throughout.
The line graph illustrates frequency of attending soccer stadiums during 2000-2018. To begin with, there is a markable contrast between indexes of Chelsea and Leeds over this period. The Chelsea had a significant growth in attendance, whereas Leeds plunged by under 60 thousands until the end of 2018. Furthermore, it is observed a marginal variation of
Liverpool's figure and was remained stable within 18 years.
The bar chart displays how many shirts were sold by three English clubs.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that there has been fluctuations in sales with Leeds falling down dramatically and Chelsea risings sales sharply throughout the period. Liverpool was the only one that stayed slightly stable from beginning to the end.
Liverpool remained steady till 2003,
Chelsea rise sales of shirts from 2000 to 2003,
Leeds mitigate sales of shirts during the same span .
Liverpool fan attendance remains on the same level throughout the year, while Chelsea club recently is raising it's popularity. Unfortunately can not say the same about Leeds, that drops in attendance drastically
Overall,the attendance for the Leeds team started at a higher peak but gradually declined throughout the years whereas Chelsea dramatically increased within the time period. However,the Liverpool attendance rate remained stable all throughout even with little fluctuations.
Overall, it can be seen that whereas Liverpool maintained a high level of attendance at football stadiums, Leeds which began at a high level of attendance fell over the course of the years.
Furthermore, although Chelsea began at a low level of attendance at football stadiums, they went on to increase in attendance over the years
Overall Leeds had by far the highest number of shirts sold in 2000 and suffered a decline in the numbers from 2001 up until 2003 with the lowest figures. In contrast, Chelsea which had the least number of shirts sold in 2000, however had a peak from 2001 up to 2003. Liverpool had the fewest number of shirts sold in 2000 and maintained a steady number throughout the years up to 2003
Overall, the table gives the expenditure by each club though transfer.Leeds had a decreasing flow from the given time whereas, Liverpool increased. Chelsea's figures flutauated from 2000 reaching the highest in 2006
The graphic illustrates the number of people watch football match in the stadium between Leeds, Chelsea, and Liverpool from 2000 to 2018. Overall, the data shows that Chelsea has the increasing numbers of supporters while Leeds is decreasing over period of time. However, Liverpool displays as the highest number of people who attend to watch the football competition with a small fluctuation
The graph clearly shows that the number of jersey's sold by the Leeds club has decreased steadily over the years, while those sold by Chelsea has increased. The Liverpool Club, however, kept a constant sale of shirts.
you're a excellent person who I can understand only your lessons especially writing 😊
Liverpool had steady decrease in shirt sale while Chelsea had steady increase in sales. Whereas 3rd one had insignificant growth in sales
It is clear from the graph that Liverpool has the most attendance from the start to end with some fluctuations. Whereas, Leeds attendance dropped significantly and went down steadily till the end. Chelsea rocketed over time.
Its difficult to write about the table. I lost in the information…
But the way he tell about the kry points that’s awesome.
Overall, the attendance of Liverpool was an insignificant rise and fall just around the same level, while Chelsea grew steadily to the top from 2000 to 2018. Leeds, on the other hand, continously decreased slowly to a point, after which, we saw a rather insignificant decrease again.
Chelsea tema has a rose surpraisily. Leeds decrease sharply in the years from 200-2001 and the other say static with few changes in the years period
From the graph it is clear that the audience turnout for Chelsea has increased steadily from the year 2000 to 2018, while Leeds saw an opposite trend over the period. Liverpool, however, kept pretty much a steady attendance, with minor fluctuations though.
Thank you so much for all the very informative and practical tips about IELTS.
You're very welcome!
The graph represents the number of shirts sold by three distinct football clubs from the year 2000 to 2008.
Overall, leads experienced a continuous decline in quantities of shirts sold over the years while that of Chelsea steadily increased. However, leads performance in the past years was significant. Liverpool encountered little changes in sales across the timeline.
the table illustrates that Chelsea increased the amount from 9.2 million to 121.7 million while Leeds faced a decline from 111.1 to 5.8 million pounds, throughout the years from 2000 to 2006. Liverpool maintained a constant value, around 26.5 million, with minor fluctuations.
Task 2. Overall Chelsea and Leeds Experienced a greater rise and fall respectively in selling shirts over the given period whereas Liverpool remains consistent with little fluctuation through out the given period .
At 7:55 you blew my mind!!!!!!!!!!! OMG
you are the best teacher ever!
It is about how many people attend football matches of three English clubs between the years 2000 and 2018
The given chart depicts;Ration of individuals visited Chelsea grew up dramatically Nonetheless the persons quantity who visited Leeds dropped to the bottom
You are simply incredible , and incredibly simple....Please Chris do post the link of pdf . Your every word and every suggestion means to me alot...Thank you so much for your support.
You're very welcome! Keep an eye on this video and I will post the link to the pdf
@@Ieltsadvantage I always look forward to seeking advice from you...
I follow your instructions religiously...You are an Angel for me. I got my prayer answered in the form of you..
To start with, the attendance level at Leeds declined throughout the period while the attendance level at Chelsea increased and Liverpool remained around the top with fluctuating attendance.
Overall,the Liverpool followed a stable equilibrium over 3 years. while both Liverpool and Leeds sold reciprocally jumbed up pattern of flow.
I understand that is the right teacher to teach me when you stop making shortcuts... Lovely!
Overall, there has been a significant increase in the number of people watching
football matches at Chelsea over these period. Once popular Leeds stadium showed a
major plummet in the football audience count recently. The stadium in Liverpool has steadily maintained
its football enthusiasts crowd with slight fluctuations in between.
1. Liverpool fluctuates over the period and hold highest position in 2018.
2. Chelsea was jumped throughout the period and crossed the Leeds in the middle of the time duration.
3. Leeds was on a first position and it was drastically declined observed in the following period.
Thanks for your answers. If you need our team to help you prepare for your IELTS test, please visit our website or contact us anytime.
Its clearly seen that, though with minor fluctuations, most of the time the largest segment of population visited liverpool stadium.
On one hand, in over a decade period of time, there is an obvious discrepancy between the proportions of Chelsea and leads’ goers. However, around 2004,the percentages of the two football stadiums attendees crossover.
Thanks for participating! If you need our team to help you prepare for your IELTS test, please email us anytime and we'll be happy to help.
Chelsea has a significant rise throughout the period, while leads showed dip declined although it had the highest number of attendance at initial period. In comparison, Liverpool had some fluctuation from beginning and still continues to the end of the period.
The line graphic shows the attendance of football fans in the stadium from year 2000 to 2028. The attendance of fans at Liverpool matches was steady and high all through to 2018. The attendance of fans at Chelsea matches steadily increased all through the year. The attendance of fans at the Leeds football club steadily experienced a decline all through the years
Overall, the attendance at Liverpool and Chelsea were higher, with the exception of Leeds.
Despite, the attendance at liverpool and leeds football stadium was just under and over 60% in 2000, however, attendance at leeds dramatically fall more than halving to around 20% in mid twenties and ending to roughly 10% in 2018, whereas liverpool after fluctuation remain stabilised near to 60% since early 2018.
On the other hand, attendees at Chelsea, although stared at 0% in 2000, it overtook Leeds and surged to below 60% over the period.
Thanks for your answers. If you need further help, please don't hesitate to reach out to us.
Overall, it is evident that when it comes to the amount of transport expenditures, Chelsea increased significantly, and Leeds decreased substantially. However, Liverpool fluctuated a little but stayed the same all thoughout the 7 year period.
Liverpool's presence at football stadium remains constant at near about sixty thousand from the year 2000 to 2018. In the meantime, Chelsea's climbed up constantly from zero to almost sixty thousand. On the contrary, the appearance of Leeds plunged down from sixty thousand to next to nothing in the same span of time.
Thank you Chris...for your simple approach to the problems..
You're very welcome!
In overview, the attendance at Liverpool stadium fluctuates throughout the years and at Chelsea football stadium, attendance experienced an exponential growth through the years while a deep fall was observed at Leeds football stadium.
The bar chart represents the number of shirts sold in different cities in years 200 to 2003
Shirts sales were the highest in Leeds but decreased steady while Chelsea is the opposite and Liverpool's continued to be at a low rate.
task 1
This graph protrays the increase and decrease of audience for a football match from the year 2000-2008.The first thing that one see's when looking at the graph is that liverpool has had a consistent number of audience with slight increase and decrease over the years.in the second case , Chelsea has increased their audience from 0 in the 2000s to nearly a 60 k in 2018.This signifies their rising popularity.The third case , the Leeds, has experienced a huge decrease in popularity with almost zero audience members in 2018.Overall Chelsea is going soaring while Leeds is plummeting,at the same time , the liverpool is going at the same pace.
To summarize, Liverpool spend much money than others, the money spent by Chelsea was almost same over the all period at the same time Leeds tried to reduce the amount of spends by years.
Sir You have Sample tast for Task 1 Like Task 2 Really Help
Key features are
Rise in the attendance of chelsea group, fall in the attendance of Leeds group and fluctuations in the attenda6of Liverpool group
Overall, in a given time period, Chelsea emerged as the top spender in terms of transfers, followed by Chelsea whilst Leeds was the least spender among all the three clubs.
Overall, The line graph clearly illustrates a substantial rise in visitors numbers in Chelsea with a steady drop in Leeds spectators with a slight plateau over a span of eight years. However, the numbers showed a constant trend with slight fluctuations for Liverpool during the entire span. The tabulated data showed the similar trend corresponds for the sales of shirts and overall expenditure on three football teams namely Chelsae, Leeds and Liverpool.
Thanks for sharing your answer! If you need help with your IELTS test preparation, please feel free to contact us.
@@Ieltsadvantage Thanks for the feedback
my writing is bad... i hope with the joining your class... my writing will be better.... thanks chris....
You're welcome!
The table shows that Liverpool's expenditure on players has remained quite stable over the seven year period. Chelsea's spending, however, has increased drastically over time, while Leeds cut down its costs on transfers.
As it can seen from the graph that Chelsea had spent great amount of money on transfers. Meanwhile, Leeds spent the most money on their transfers as a second team. Furthermore, Liverpool spent less money in compare to other two teams.
Only channel which I felt genuine
The number of people that visited Liverpool football stadium fluctuates but remains steady over the years, while in Leeds, the number of those who visited dropped drastically and the numbers of those who visited Chelsea increased gradually over the years
number of shirts sold:
1. # of shirt sold in increased in Chelsea whereas that in Leeds decreased
2. shirts sold in Leeds has been consistent
Overall, the attendance for Liverpool fluctuated but stayed remained unchanged while lead attendance declined .Chelsea attendance increased steadily throughout the time period.
Overall, the presence off people at Chelsea escalated with the passage of time though it did not have an appreciated inceptive outlook. Furthermore, it is also evident that the number of people in Liverpool fluctuated in a continuous manner as compared to Leeds, which had a negative attendance of people by the end of the period.
Task 1.
Overall, Chelsea recorded a significant increase in attendance while Leeds experienced a drastic decline over the given time period. However, with varying fluctuations, Liverpool maintained the highest number of attendees....
The graph depicts the fan following of three clubs chelsea, liverpool and leeds. It can be seen that the popularity of chelsea is seen to be growing whereas that of leeds can be seen to be dropping. Liverpool has had a constant fan following over the years.
Overall , Chelsea experienced an increase through out the years whereas lead had a decreasing trend and Liverpool attendance fluctuated all through .
Overall, it can been clearly seen that sales of leeds club t shirts declined in the given period whereas chelsea's rose significantly. A fluctuation is seen in liverpools sales
Overall, Chelsa's shirt sales increased throughout the given period. Despite the number of shirts sold by leeds witnessed a steady decrease up to final years. Liverpool's sales fluctuated between 2000 and 2003.
Thank you Chris, for this amazing video...
Overall, the people who were present at the football stadium in the year 2000 to 2018 ascended a lot more.
Overview, it is evident that attendance in liver pool has remians stable over given period.
Overall, Chelsea's total attendance increased throughout the given period. Despite the Leeds went the opposite direction. The Liverpool attendance fluctuated between 2000 and 2018.
Thankyou Chris for the lesson on how to select key features, 've learned something. I really appreciate. Justina from Zambia
You're welcome!
If you have any questions or need our team of IELTS teachers to help you prepare for your exam, please feel free to contact us.
Overall, Leeds filed the highest number of attendants at the initial periods then after a gradual reduction in the numbers towards the end of years. On the other hand, Chelsea recorded the least subscribers at the beginning and an accelerated growth towards the end periods. However, Liverpool maintain the highest growth and fluctuates throughout the years but Leeds as a team documented a same level of growth with each team at a particular year period.
Overall, Liverpool had the highest sale of shirts in 2000 and the lowest in 2003, as opposed to Chelsea, which sold most shirts in 2003 and the least sales in 2000. Leeds however, sold about the same quantities throughout the 4 years.
Overall the Leeds popularity lagged behind the Liverpool and chelson. Eventhough the Liverpool as well as chelson popular yet Liverpool is the most famous one.
Overall, attendance at Liverpool’s stadium increased between the periods that goes from 2001 to 2018, on the other hand it can be seen that the attendance of Chelsea’s fans increased and the attendance of Leeds’ fans decreased over the years.
can we write date in overview?
Overall, Liverpool had oscillated throughout 18 years whereas Chelsea had a sharply inflated, and Leeds had rapidly fallen but from about 6 years it descended slowly.
Overall, The line graph illustrates an increasing pattern in football attendance by Chelsea fans from 2000 to 2008 while it's fluctuating by Liverpool fans. However Leeds fans had a decline which progressed drastically all through the years.
The table shows that the money spent on transfers in Leeds club showed a steady decline through the years, whereas the money spent on transfers in Chelsea club shows a steady increase in amount throughout the years. Finally, the money spent on transfers in Liverpool club shows a constant spending with only minimal changes throughout the years
Are you gonna do for General Task 1 ? Please do. Thanks Chris.
This may be something we do in the future, subscribe to the channel to be notified when we go live.
Overall ,Liverpool had a significant fluctuation with the highest number of people between the year 2000 to 2018. In contrast the number of people in Chelsea rose sharply from the year 2000 to 2018.
Overall,clearly, number of attendees of Liverpool club fluctuated throughout the given period, while two other football clubs namely, Chelsea and Leeds saw a gradual and significant upward and downward trends respectively.Remarkably, Leeds attendance rate become the lowest by the end of the period despite having a considerable following in the beginning.
Overall, the money spent on players in the Liverpool team recorded a fluctuation and a dramatic increase in transfers for Chelsa's players, and Liverpool transfers receded throughout the given period.
Of course to me I listen to you always and so thanks
hi sir Wow Wow i like your way and your strait way to the point
1. football club attendance in Liverpool experienced flactuation period
2. Number of Chelsea club members increased dramatically
3. There was a period of sharp decrease in Leeds attendance
1. Overall the attendance of Liverpool remained the highest and it had very minimal fluctuations. While the attendance at Chelsa stadium experienced a steep escalation in the number of people attending. Contradicting to this, the stadium of Leeds which initially had a higher number of attendance experienced a significant downfall.
2. Overall the number of shirts sold in Leeds was the highest in the beginning, Meanwhile the number of shirts sold in Liverpool remained almost constant throughout the year, whereas the sale of shirts in the Chelsa stadium grew steadily.
3. Overall there has been an increase in the money spent on transfers by Liverpool and Chelsa stadium but the amount of money spent on transfers by Leeds stadium has decreased significantly.
it was so useful, thank you!
Hope you can make youtube live videos again.