What’s at the Center of a Black Hole?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
  • In this video, we try to explain what lies at the heart of black holes, where the laws of physics break down.
    WATCH ANOTHER VIDEO: Earth and a Black Hole the Mass of the Sun
    • Earth and a Black Hole...
    CHECK OUT OUR MERCH: www.teepublic....
    You are welcome to support us so we can create more quality content:
    www.buymeacoff...
    Join this channel to get access to the perks:
    / @cosmoknowledge
    SUBSCRIBE ► goo.gl/PLLFPz
    ----
    Website ► cosmoknowledge...
    Instagram ► / itscosmoknowledge
    Facebook ► / cosmoknowledge
    TikTok ► / cosmoknowledge
    Twitter ► / cosmoknowledge
    Produced, directed, and edited by:
    Ardit Bicaj
    Graphics:
    envato.com
    Music:
    Final Girl - Jeremy Blake
    A big thank you to our lovely channel members:
    Joseph Pacchetti
    john roberts
    Ali Rıza Şeren
    Heywood Tate
    Dave Jarrard
    Bethany Dean
    jaeyun tous les monde
    -
    Cosmoknowledge brings news from space.
    We love you, explorers!

Комментарии • 105

  • @Fastcarsdriveslow
    @Fastcarsdriveslow 3 месяца назад +12

    It's amazing how we can only talk about it & never understand

    • @Whatisright
      @Whatisright 3 месяца назад +1

      We can, it's a big magnet.

    • @LaurentCassaro
      @LaurentCassaro 3 месяца назад

      ​@@Whatisright🤣

    • @Whatisright
      @Whatisright 3 месяца назад

      @@LaurentCassaro Can’t tell if you’re laughing at or with so…

    • @LaurentCassaro
      @LaurentCassaro 3 месяца назад

      @@Whatisright A black hole isn't a "big magnet"

    • @Whatisright
      @Whatisright 3 месяца назад

      @@LaurentCassaro Everything in the universe is magnetism and unless I miss understand there is no magnetism at the center of any magnet. I know it itself isn’t a magnet but it’s all the same properties of magnetism. Large scale force and motion.

  • @LouieC
    @LouieC 3 месяца назад +8

    Black holes are my favorite subject. They absolutely fascinate me. Thanks for posting this!

    • @Cosmoknowledge
      @Cosmoknowledge  3 месяца назад +1

      We appreciate you being here ❤️

    • @ThomasChok
      @ThomasChok 3 месяца назад +1

      @@Cosmoknowledgemy first time that I see you comment. 🎉🎉

    • @LouieC
      @LouieC 3 месяца назад

      @@ThomasChok if that's true I am honored he chose me 😀

  • @7HillsTown
    @7HillsTown 3 месяца назад +7

    Inside the event horizon is where the Rulers of each Galaxy live. There's such a strong gravitational force in there that time stops. This is how the Rulers of the Galaxy live forever in their super advanced antigravity bubbles inside black holes. Actually that's why they don't pay us a visit very often. If they do, they get old pretty fast and they don't want that. Those who have ventured outside their black hole the most are the oldest and most experienced amongst them all.

    • @NeedMorePlebs
      @NeedMorePlebs 2 месяца назад

      How do they rule the galaxy if they never leave the event horizon?

    • @7HillsTown
      @7HillsTown 2 месяца назад

      @@NeedMorePlebs, where did I write that they never leave the event horizon? I know that today's physics says it's impossible, but after all what i wrote there is just a science fiction that I made up. A million years from now the ancestors of humanity could possibly reach that level of knowledge and technology and eventually figure it out. Who knows, right?!

    • @NeedMorePlebs
      @NeedMorePlebs 2 месяца назад

      @@7HillsTown you said they don't leave often. Hard to rule galaxy if they don't leave often.

  • @josephpacchetti5997
    @josephpacchetti5997 4 месяца назад +4

    Very good Video, I believe the other members should be watching these also, Thanks Ardit & Crew, you folks have one of the best channels, For me anyway, Cheers. 👍🇺🇸

  • @SPACETVnet
    @SPACETVnet 3 месяца назад +5

    Infinity is only know to exist in simulations and mathematics.

    • @Whatisright
      @Whatisright 3 месяца назад +2

      There's no infinity, only Eternity in my view. Infinity is the lack or loss of an end point. Eternity is both lacking of a starting and end points. I think infinity is an assumption. As time can theoretically go on forever, the problem is time isn't a real thing in nature. It's a unit of measurement for conceptualization to mark change. Change is eternal and therefore all there is, was, and will be.
      Long ass way to say I agree with you. Sorry.

    • @SPACETVnet
      @SPACETVnet 3 месяца назад

      @@Whatisright 1 ÷ 3 = 0.333333 (to infinity) or ⅓
      This simple calculation easily demonstrates infinity is real.

    • @SPACETVnet
      @SPACETVnet 3 месяца назад

      ​@@Whatisright There is infinity, and it can be demonstrated easily with this simple calculation:
      1 ÷ 3 = 0.333333333 (to infinity).

    • @Whatisright
      @Whatisright 3 месяца назад

      @@SPACETVnet I get that but it’s not something that appears as an occurrence in nature naturally outside our doing math. Like there’s no multiplication in nature only addition. Nothing multiplies consistently or predictably.

    • @EternalNico1
      @EternalNico1 3 месяца назад

      @@WhatisrightJust because we don’t fully understand it right now doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist

  • @wizardoffrobozz
    @wizardoffrobozz 3 месяца назад +7

    the other side of a black hole is another big-bang

  • @charlielucas3386
    @charlielucas3386 3 месяца назад

    A singularity: an infinitely dense point smaller than a speck of dust where time stops and matter becomes nonexistent

  • @Stick-xh5tb
    @Stick-xh5tb 3 месяца назад +1

    0:19 rip planet

  • @Sumpydumpert
    @Sumpydumpert 3 месяца назад +1

    I’ve been making post all over trying throw concepts out there on Reddit grand unified theory, space dust live and this RUclips community I’d love feedback from anyone

  • @michaelrobison703
    @michaelrobison703 3 месяца назад +1

    0:37 #Gennissperiod

    • @michaelrobison703
      @michaelrobison703 3 месяца назад

      3:15 33:33:33. 4:56 #brainfuctionssimalationverycoolthankyouperiod
      55:55:55.1
      :39:6 4 22 9 18 3:16

  • @janithdulanga1078
    @janithdulanga1078 3 месяца назад

    Can you please answer to me is that universe expanding because of the dark energy or universe expanding accelerate because of the dark energy

  • @redd605
    @redd605 3 месяца назад

    At this point in time voyager 1 could be near one , what has happened to it?

    • @bens7622
      @bens7622 3 месяца назад

      The voyager one is not going nearly fast enough to get to a black hole. They (black holes) are several light years away and would take millions of years to reach with current tech.

  • @Juicycouturebubblegumwhore
    @Juicycouturebubblegumwhore 3 месяца назад +5

    Well that sucks, no pun intended.

  • @jesusaguilar-sanchez8336
    @jesusaguilar-sanchez8336 Месяц назад

    What if black holes instead of giving back particles it gives back time which is why as you get near a black hole 🕳 time speeds up for you as you look back into the universe idk im just throwing ideas thinking outside the box hajaha but you never know.

  • @HeLLFiREGM
    @HeLLFiREGM 3 месяца назад

    if Horizon stop time. the black hole never grow up. singularity is very high mass object. that's it

  • @darylbrown8834
    @darylbrown8834 3 месяца назад

    Space itself is just merely a shadow' time is just a man made tool used for measuring mass and magnitudes. You can't bend or stretch one no more than you can the other. They are not things. What is doing all the bending and stretching are magnetic fields permeating throughout space due to being in the vicinity of others causing those interactions. Alot of us have seen a magnet on a ferrocell. In some cases two or more on a ferrocell. Two magnets coming close to each other without touching creates what looks like another counter space between them. Who's to say black holes are only created by stellar collapse? I myself believe there is another way. Two magnetic fields nearing each other. Analogy: ➗ magnet on ferrocell' or side view of spiral galaxy, plane of inertia with two poles or fermibubbles.

    • @LaurentCassaro
      @LaurentCassaro 3 месяца назад

      You're aware that magnetic fields don't generate gravity?

  • @solankies
    @solankies 3 месяца назад

    Bro few days ago you were explaining crypto!!!

  • @timothy8426
    @timothy8426 3 месяца назад

    Space is a weak external magnetic field filled with dark heat energy outside of the entanglement of mass. Stars decay their atmospheres as heat waves resonate outward force of pressure as minimum force of pressure and maximum distance traveling as normal space filled with dark heat energy. When a star decays its external magnetic fields and they weaken and get pulled into itself through the internal magnetic field grounding currents through the nucleus or core where external heat energy force overwhelming its nucleus or core explodes outward force of pressure expelling all heat energy outward leaving behind unoccupied space as voids of absolute zero heat energy as cold repulsion of space to heat energy propulsion outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable heat energy when entanglement with mass occurs. Space as a weak external magnetic field filled with dark heat energy can only be collected around the perimeter of absolute zero energy voids and can't penetrate these monopoles of pure fabric of cold space itself. Gravity doesn't exist. Magnets show internal magnetic fields grounding currents into itself through the nucleus or core like earth's internal magnetic field. Heat waves as renewable energy striking mass as force of pressure known as weight are currents of heat waves passing through all masses in its path until resistance is overcome by open space itself and returns to dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable energy when entanglement with mass occurs again. Liquidity infinity to illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity. Magnetic fields are stronger at their cores. Magnetic fields are cold repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion as perpetual motion. Unification of unidirectional flow cycling backward into itself and surrounding mass as directional force of pressure grounding currents through the nucleus or core exchanging singularities point to point chain reactions through all masses in its path. Internal magnetic fields cycling circulation patterns through the nucleus or core. External magnetic fields don't ground currents of heat energy as pure repulsion to heat energy. Magnetism circulation patterns outside of external magnetic fields don't flow through the nucleus or core but around the perimeter of absolute zero energy within as monopoles of pure repulsion to heat energy. Grounding currents is necessary for mass to exist. Heat accumulates as fire or internal magnetic fields decaying as disolving internal magnetic fields outward in proximity to external magnetic fields that don't ground but disrupt normal repulsion of space itself by neutralized repulsion to proximity mass in its stronger external magnetic field. Internal magnetic fields are outward the force of pressure known as weightless outside of a greater internal magnetic field like earth's internal magnetic field grounding currents back into itself through the nucleus or core. External magnetic fields don't ground energy but have massive magnetic fields of forced circulation cycling patterns created around these generators of pure cold repulsion of space itself to heat propulsion. Anti matter is the event horizon acts as a generator for potentially faster repulsion to heat propulsion. Normal space is filled with dark heat energy outside of entanglement. Distance traveling increases, and force of pressure decreases outside of entanglement of mass. Hydrogen has the strongest internal magnetic field of force of pressure and the minimum distance traveling. Hydrogen under extreme pressure expands into helium. Helium occupies more space than hydrogen. Mass occupies space as space within neutralized cold repulsion as outward force of pressure known as weightless outside of a greater internal magnetic field like earth's. Inside of earth's internal magnetic field grounding currents through all masses in its path as renewable energy incoming exchanging singularities outgoing to maintain temperature equalization as mass. Helium occupies more space, and the force of pressure decreases, and distance traveling increases in equalization to pressure within and without. Mass falls in equalization to force of pressure within and without entanglement. Force and distance traveling equalization to outward repulsion of pressure to Inside force of pressure. External magnetic fields disrupt outward force of pressure as neutralized repulsion within the accretion disk around the perimeter and proximity mass as the outward force of pressure disolves its internal magnetic fields grounding towards the greater external magnetic field flow and the weakest point of repulsion around these external magnetic fields. Force of pressure is maintained in and out of entanglement of mass in equalization. Heat has to ground through the core or nucleus of internal magnetic fields as temperature equalization of pressure. The force of pressure currents grounding themselves through all masses in its path is known as weight. Table of elements proves hypothesis. As mass expands, its force of pressure weakens, and distance traveling increases. The closer to the core, the more heat currents passing through mass as molten masses or fire. Fire is external energy releasing heat energy outside of entanglement of internal magnetic fields disolving into external energy flow towards the weakest point of resistance. Proximity mass loses its ability to cycle circulation patterns grounding currents and disolves internal grounding magnetic fields as repulsion without is disrupted by occupational external energy flow towards the weakest point of repulsion. Fire spreading. Lightning burns through atmospheres, disolving internal magnetic fields of gasses of atmospheres. Releasing heat energy and unoccpying space within the earth's atmosphere as pure cold repulsion of space itself. But the surrounding atmospheres are stronger than the void created by the breakdown of mass and slamming shut on the void as rolling thunder heat resonates outwardly force as pressure equalization. In space voids created by stars exploding away, their heat energy outward force hasn't the force needed to fill the void created. Space as a weak external magnetic field filled with dark heat energy can only accumulate around these perimeters of monopoles of pure fabric of cold space. Creating an external magnetic field synchronization of flow. Disrupted normal space repulsion outside of the sphere. Spheres are proof of cold repulsion of space itself throughout space. Centrifugal force of pressure is maintained by galaxies in external magnetic fields. Heat loss is decay or aging depending on the amount. Rapid heat exchanging through mass as renewable energy exchanging singularities striking sparks (electrons) lighting up surrounding atmospheres as daylight. Lightning burns through atmospheres, striking sparks lighting up the darkness of night in a flash. Electrons are sparks of striking resistance of particles exchanging singularities or decaying mass. Lightning decaying mass. Daylight is normal space exchanging heat singularities through grounding currents towards the greater magnetic field flow as weight of force of pressure towards the weakest point of repulsion flowing currents into synchronization of external energy exchanging points through mass as renewable heat energy. Magnetism circulation patterns of force recycling energy within and without as entanglement of external energy flow. Liquidity infinity to illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity. Heat is always liquidity infinity in and out of entanglement of mass. Cycling circulation varies according to occupational space. Table of elements proves hypothesis. As mass expands, it occupies more cold space, and distance traveling increases, and the force of pressure decreases. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Mass is an outward force of pressure known as heat. External heat energy. Electricity is rapid heat exchanging through mass and has to ground. Sparks are electrons quantumized as daylight. Light doesn't travel heat waves do. Heat magnification of light refraction throughout space and atmospheres. Light doesn't travel heat does. Heat magnification of refraction of light throughout space and atmospheres.

    • @LaurentCassaro
      @LaurentCassaro 3 месяца назад

      A giant wall of word salad about science soup of the RUclips Academy.
      🤦‍♂️

  • @geraldleuven169
    @geraldleuven169 3 месяца назад +1

    Look guys I'm unique, I'm a cosmo nerd but I also have a huge arm tattoo.
    I'm special.

  • @alexanderhugestrand
    @alexanderhugestrand 3 месяца назад

    At the center of a black hole is a division by zero. The center is a boundary condition the theory doesn't handle. As such, the theory is at best incomplete. At worst, it's completely wrong and needs to be replaced.
    Also, since there's a man who seems to be more intelligent than both Einstein and the entire astrophysical community that followed after him, by the name Stephen Crothers, who's analyzed the math and showed beyond any doubt that the math black holes rely on is incorrect, I think we know which one it is.

    • @LaurentCassaro
      @LaurentCassaro 3 месяца назад

      🤣
      Stephen who? The gardener?
      🤣

    • @alexanderhugestrand
      @alexanderhugestrand 3 месяца назад

      @@LaurentCassaro You're offering a perfect example of someone who doesn't want to take in a different perspective. Maybe you don't even understand what he says, which is also extremely likely. The ad hominem fallacy isn't far away.

    • @LaurentCassaro
      @LaurentCassaro 3 месяца назад

      @@alexanderhugestrand Yeah, "sure", whatever you said.
      🤦‍♂️
      I just had a look at this man's sulfurous history, and the plethora of publications he's made. He's basically the Samuel Rowbotham of astrophysics, or the Kent Hovind of young Earth creationism. Comparing him to Einstein is just ... hilarious.
      The man still argue that black holes don't exist, even with all the evidences. And claims general relativity is full of fallacies and errors. He's also a supporter of the Electric Universe.
      To resume in a few words, a gigantic waste of time.

    • @LaurentCassaro
      @LaurentCassaro 3 месяца назад

      @@alexanderhugestrand "maybe you don't even understand"
      Says the guy who wrote that there's a "division by zero" at the center of a black hole. Infinitely small and zero are two different things, mathematically.
      But that doesn't stop you to conclude that the theory is incomplete/completely wrong...

    • @alexanderhugestrand
      @alexanderhugestrand 3 месяца назад

      @@LaurentCassaro So the singularity is all of a sudden not of zero volume, but only infinitesimally small? And you don't see a problem with that?
      You know, there is a simple proof that 0.9999... is numerically equal to 1. So it's equally easy to show that 0.0000...1 is numerically equal to 0.
      x = 0.999...
      10x = 9.999...
      10x - x = 9x = 9
      So x = 1.

  • @Khannea
    @Khannea 3 месяца назад +3

    Nope. The innermost region of a black hole Dense Neutronium or Quark matter which is frozen in time, unchanged from its moment of formation. The universe censors anything more dense than that by simply stopping the flow of time. It takes an infinite amount of time for a singularity collapse to occur. All matter that rains down into a black hole freeze in time at the event horizon, and extends the event horizon a bit outward. The moment matter gets to crossing the event horizon it stays there forever and ever.
    A typical neutron star is just a few kilometers diameter. If you postulate a ball of neutronium that weighs 4 million solar masses (such as Sagittarius A*) it's only 6000 or so kilometers big, bit that mass projects an event horizon that's 44 million kilometers big.

    • @PhoenixLegends99
      @PhoenixLegends99 3 месяца назад +1

      Pretty much all of this is wrong. It doesn't take an infinite amount of time for collapse to a singularity to occur - time from any given reference frame always appears to move normally, it's just from our reference frame something would take infinite time to pass the event horizon. As for comparing a neutron star with a black hole for size, you can't do that either, because the gravity of a black hole exceeds the outward push of neutron degeneracy pressure which is what prevents neutron stars collapsing further inwards.

    • @HostyleMedia
      @HostyleMedia 3 месяца назад

      Where did you get this information that you are so certain about. Even Stephen Hawking was not 100% certain. You probably listen to Neil D Tyson.😂

    • @PhoenixLegends99
      @PhoenixLegends99 3 месяца назад +1

      ​@@HostyleMedia They're a good example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. They've studied enough to know about stuff like time dilation, but not enough to realise all the implications of it. Because they know more than most of the people they know, they assume they're an expert on the subject, but they haven't learnt enough to recognise just how much stuff they still don't understand.

    • @HostyleMedia
      @HostyleMedia 3 месяца назад

      @@PhoenixLegends99 correct.👍🏼 i feel like the information a few years old is likely irrelevant and incorrect. Unless it’s a fundamental proven equation . All other information is irrelevant and obsolete. We are back to square one. It’s a guessing game. No one can guess wrong because we have little to no evidence. How can we even guess when we have yet to visualize a black hole? A true physicist answer is he or she is not certain. The more you study astrophysics the farther you are from reaching a conclusion. The universe is incomprehensible even to Einstein. He was boggled by how complex is quantum theory. The more we study the cosmos the less we know.

  • @bens7622
    @bens7622 3 месяца назад

    I think it’s just a really fast fidget spinner

  • @ZubairMobile-sh3ey
    @ZubairMobile-sh3ey 3 месяца назад

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @Brett-yq7pj
    @Brett-yq7pj 3 месяца назад

    I heard it was a timbit

  • @ZubairMobile-sh3ey
    @ZubairMobile-sh3ey 3 месяца назад

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @Whatisright
    @Whatisright 3 месяца назад +1

    At the center of a black hole is exactly what "we see" when we look at a black hole. Like a whirlpool doesn't have any water in the middle of it. When you get the smallest swirling point the swirling water simply dissipates back into the surrounding water or "space." It's force and motion that makes a whirlpool what it is. There's nothing at the center, like a donut or bagel has nothing at the center. But that nothing isn't nothing, it's not a void. In renderings of black holes that black unmoving bubble in the center is the Aether or Space. The light show swirling around it is space in motion. Same exact stuff that's is the black mass just in motion. If stars create space, black holes create motion. If you ask where does the light show we see come from, it is the light. Light doesn't move through space, it is space. Time, like inches, is a measure of something, not an actual real thing itself. Not unlike a shadow which isn't real just the illusion of real because we observe them. In a lot of ways none of these things are objects, not a star or a black hole. There's a question of what is an object in nature and what is something happening. For stars, black holes, super novas, planets etc they aren't objects but rather events occurring in nature. These aren't things that became something, it's all simply things happening. The black mass and the swirling matter around it are all the same just in different states. That black spot is the only real "stillness" we'll find in the cosmos. Like the Planet Express Ship in Futurama that Dr. Farnsworth built (he deserves a real award for that), the engines doesn't move the ship instead it moves the Universe around it, exactly like a black hole. A star creates space and zips around the cosmos, a black hole creates force and motion and moves the universe around itself. Looking for a singularity I'd say there is none, what we see is it, that's the point, the hole itself is it. The unmoving mover, unchanging changer. Creating but never created. A formless form. A whirlpool isn't what's inside it, it's what makes it. It's the force and motion itself churning the water that is the point. All the action we see is what we're looking for, we don't look for the missing center of a bagel or donut. Matter, information, energy or whatever we want to call it cannot be destroyed so what happens to it inside a black hole? If we poured store bought water into the ocean, what happened to or became of our water, nothing. It went back to being part of the big water it always was and where it would ultimately end up regardless. Ask what the cause of force and motion is it's magnetism.
    An interesting thought exercise is a big invisible water ballon underwater in a pool. The balloon is invisible but not the water in it. The mass is moving with the water in the pool but not as a part of it, it's its own "object." It would look weird compared to the rest of the surroundings which is also water, because while it is moving it's not moving really. I imagine this to be like a black hole minus the vortex and those effects. It's all magnetic forces at the center of all magnets there is no magnetism. But how would things look if the balloon was spun? Still or spun it would only be observable by how the water around it behaves. All the action between their states of motion or non motion happens at the boundary. Compressing down whatever comes within a black hole seems too complicated. If our balloon gets too full it'd pop to release the excess water. For a black hole, because the forces involved are magnetic, excess matter is ejected at the poles. Matter in the disk is essentially being converted back into it's basic form and ejected back out into the cosmos at the poles. Sounds far easier than compressing it into tiny space. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. We're from the Earth and will go back to it. Why do those rules not apply to the rest of the universe? How does matter change it's state and back again? Stars and black holes. If energy aka light aka matter, cannot be created or destroyed then it has to be cycled. Stars to black holes are all part of the system that transforms, recycles, and redistributes energy. Energy being light or matter.
    This is where it's either our understanding or our way of understanding that's flawed. A black hole isn't anomaly, they're very existence proves their necessity. Whatever theories that got us this far that didn't account for them is what is flawed otherwise they would have. For some reason the programing in a calculator stops working with these things. What's missing at the center of all these holes isn't water, matter, or bread, it's force and motion. It's not an absence or compression of matter, it's the absence of movement.

  • @BigNewGames
    @BigNewGames 3 месяца назад +13

    At the center of black holes is massive amounts of pressure and heat. There's no wormhole or other dimension. Be real.

    • @LouieC
      @LouieC 3 месяца назад +14

      You've been there I see 🙄

    • @charlesgaines-g4u
      @charlesgaines-g4u 3 месяца назад +4

      There's no heat, it's cold

    • @sharmaxop
      @sharmaxop 3 месяца назад +2

      dont know about dimension or wormhole bcoz who know what is there in the blackhole until someone goes in it. There is a also a possibility of other dimension and wormhole as same as interstellar movie

    • @AmateurHistorian999
      @AmateurHistorian999 3 месяца назад

      You just haven't watched enough sci-fi.

    • @maddietrujilpo5526
      @maddietrujilpo5526 3 месяца назад

      @@charlesgaines-g4uit’s a mix of both the event horizon is extremely hot while the blackhole itself is extremely cold