problem is alot of sufis use mathhabs as a cover for bidah. if a non Muslim lies on Quran and Sunnah you have them in front of you. if a sufi lied in the name of mathhab, where is that book in front of you its usually not there. why create an artificial vulnerability, in fact mathhabs teach I am a means to sunnah and follow any hadith i miss on a topic , in context of course. so where is there transparency between Muslims and non Muslims but not between Muslims, especially when Islam is perfect why use the mathhabs wrong and create a vulnerability to promote sufi blind following and bida? this not only opposes the Quran like in Quran 12,108 but the mathhabs as well who say we are only a means to the Sunnah! this opposes the meaning of Muhammadur RAsulalah that our isnad ends with the Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him when able. Look at the book Prophets's prayer by sheikh Albani on the quotes of the 4 mathhabs on how they are a means of unity on sunnah, not division without sunnah as many imams use them and even divided into 4 jamats in their name, thats not Islam, thats cultism. reject cultism and follow the Prophet peace and blessings on him directly as even the 4 mathhabs said! Following the Prophet peace and blessings on him is following perfection, we are human but we aim for the best! 1) Imam Abu Hanifah - whatever is sahih is my mathhab, 2) Imam Malik - Exveryone can be accepted or rejected not the Prophet peace and blessings on him! 3) Imam Shafi - Sunnah reaches and escapes all of us, 4) Imam Ahmad - don't just look to us but see where from the sunnah we take from!
"The sufis use mathhabs as a cover for bidah". LOL! The only real problem here is with you, and the dubious sources from which you get your "knowledge".
@Faizal Abubaker LOL! What planet are you living on? Here's a little homework problem for you: do a little bit of research and make a list yourself. Hint: Start in chronological order from the time of the Prophet (as) and for each shaykh note down which shaykhs he learnt from, which school of thought he followed if applicable and also which tariqah, if applicable. Perhaps also make a note of the works which they are famous for and why they wrote them. Maybe you will learn something you didn't know before and more importantly realise how foolish your question is and how tunnel-visioned your current thinking is.
Subhanallah. How miraculous these tapes can now be played infinitely for all to breathe in the beauty and purity of Shaykh Albani’s wisdom, patience and eloquence. Masyallah, these tapes teach scholars and non-scholars alike.
Imam Malik may Allah Ta’ala be pleased with him is reported to have said “learn good manners before seeking knowledge” Something to ponder over greatly in this day age.
Alhamdullillah we are following islam regarding with madhab,it help to follow islam properly with quran and sunnah of prophet ﷺ.May Allah guide you All
SubhanAllah he made the topic so easy to understand!! For decades now this has been a topic of discussion amongst the youth in my lifetime. Yet here, the shaykh (الله يرحمه) made it so easy in a matter of minutes!!
Albani is using fallacious logic. He is saying reject the madhab and agree with ME! As all Salafi scholars expect blind Taqlid from their Salafi laymen.
@@ibbydread6092 he didn't say that. What I understood is he basically said follow whoever gives you better proof. Proof = Allah said, The Messenger (saw) said which is Quran and Sunnah.
May Allah save all common 'layman' Muslims from confusion in the matter of Deen and hold them firmly onto one amongst the well established 4 school of thoughts of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaat of our pious Salaf i.e. the schools of the 4 Imams of the Ahlus Sunnah. There is a reason y all of these 4 schools have been deemed correct as they dealt with and have solutions of all the known and established matters of Deen and Shariah and therefore the door of Ijtihaad was closed on these matters centuries back when majority of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah back then after the Imams studied, understood and came to a conclusion that all the matters have been covered by the school of these Imams and the Hadith evidence used in all the rulings cannot be argued against n thus all of them are correct. Ijtihaad thus is only required for new matters that keep coming up with time and rulings on these new matters are given based upon the well established Usuul e Deen. N these Usuul e Deen themselves just to b clear in all these schools of thought are based upon the understanding of the great Imams of how the Sahaba RA and the Tabaeen used to deduce rulings on matters with the knowledge of all the acts, teachings and sayings of Rasulullah SAW available to them.
At the end of the day, it's about deciding whether you want to follow your own analysis or the analysis of the 4 imams who were from the Salaf us Saliheen.
Following an Ijteehad of a scholar is in essence following the way of the sunnah given the scholar avoids bida,shirk and is on sound aqeeda and is upon the (4 school of thoughts) moreover how any scholar of any of these 4 school of thoughts come to conclusion is called usool ( method of deriving a ruling) This is where differences of opinion arises such differences existed during the first 3 generations. So for anyone ( with all due respect to each and everyone of them)to claim following opinions of any of those usool i.e method so long as they meet the prerequisites of correct aqeeda, and Tawhid are not from the people of the sunnah fails to see the very opinion they are promoting of obeying sunnah and to ask the scholars for opinion regarding any given matter. May God protect every believer and forgive those on earth and those who have departed laymen or scholars.
As Salaam alaikum In every generation there are people who would strive to remain as close to quran and hadeeth as possible. And there would be a group of people who would try to justify their position. We need to ask ourselves, to which group do we belong. Companions of our beloved prophet would instantaneously resort to a position where stronger evidence were brought.
I read the comments, then saw the video. The comments make it seem like this video is absolutely golden... but i watched it and it was only a simple discussion, with a lot of side-discussed which swayed from the main discussion. Skip to 14 minutes for the more relevant parts. The first 14 minutes was just a bit of jostling between the questioner and questioned.
Allahu alem if this answered the question Muslims continue to ask. The issue of following a Madhab as a framework is surely the best way - it is not following blindly as they are all based on evidences and the manner in which the evidences are graded is also different within each school (so the notion of rejecting an opinion if a stronger opinion is presented is also open to interpretation). If anything the Sheikh confirmed what Scholars have said for centuries, nobody is saying to blindly follow, so I am confused as to where this idea arises from? Is it also not a form of taqlid to follow those who say not to follow an established school of thought, developed over centuries with access to sources and people who were close to the early Muslims? Again, how can the average Muslim (i.e.99.99%) live their Islam without a framework? How would an average person know if this opinion is right over the other, when another Scholar says otherwise? The tide has turned back to referring to established schools as 1400 years of scholarship cannot be wrong, and away from this confusion. I reiterate, the fact these questions are being repeatedly asked, is surely evidence that following an established framework is the safest option. Wa Allah Alem.
As Salaamu Alaikum According to consensus of the scholars it is Obligatory for a laymen to follow a methaab this Salafi nonsense destroy the islamic community in America base of Al Abaani understanding of the deen
The Idea is madhhabs exist to guide people to following Islam properly. But if you do not know something, do you check the madhab or the quran/sunnah, if you check with your madhhab over the words of Allah and Muhammed(SAW) then you simply are a slave to the madhhab and not Islam. Madhhab is for reference not a Rulebook. Quran is the Rulebook. I did not mean to offend anyone. I agree that you see someone following a madhhab is better for a layman as you have easier access to it, but it is not greater than following the Quran and Sunnah, the precise way the Prophet has taught Islam, the religion of Allah. The way it was meant to be followed.
He did not say to leave the framework of madhab but to leave following opinion blindly . He only ask ulema to follow quran and sunnah and manhaj alsalf so they guid layman accordingly. For layman they should not ask about madhab opinion but to ask for evidence from quran, sunnah. And salf manhaj. Regarding ijtahad matter you seek what most big ulema say about the matter also according to Quran, sunnah and manhaj alsalf.
The Shaykh’s logic falls over on itself. If it’s an obligation on a lay person to ask a person of knowledge, and he acts upon the answer, that entails putting trust into that scholars opinion. So what is the difference between that, and a person taking from the madhhabs? In both cases, the lay person is following a person of knowledge.
I don't think the Shaykh is opposed to following a madhab. I think the discussion was more about it shouldn't be obligatory to follow a madhab and that it shouldn't be obligatory to follow one madhab exclusively. This is because there were Muslims before the madhabs that would have died as Muslims. He's refuting people that say 'you HAVE to follow a madhab and HAVE to follow everything from that single madhab or your Islam is wrong'
The Idea is sometimes a madhhab has a different answer to a problem compared to the Quran and Sunnah(which is greater that the opinion of a Sheikh). He says to follow the Quran and Sunnah and when it comes to doubtful subjects ask a scholar, it may be Sheikh Al-Albani or Sheikh Ahmed ibn Hanbal. Since both are scholars. TLDR: No need for opinions on matters regarding which Allah has already addressed. As you may know the Hanafis pray dhuhr and asr at a later time than the time intended for it by God. So Here we follow the Quran over the Madhhabs, as their existence(the madhhabs) is to help us follow the quran.
@@LegitMHx the madhahib make sure there are no transgressions. They are a safe hold for the Muslims who came after. To move out of the madhahib means to move on thin ice.
@@LegitMHx *you have to follow a madhab and have to follow everything from that single madhab or your Islam is wrong" Who claimed that. Where? Show me.
@@diefaust4252 I believe some people might actually think that. It's not like I have a source to tell you, I'm just trying to explain what the Shaykh was saying
Albani is right. And it is common sense that Madhabs must be rejecyed on areas where it directly opposes Allah and our prophet. Unfortunately i know some malikis who are fine with dogs saliva, even though its against rest of the three madhabs and salaf and hadeeths. Thats what madhabs does. Its another religion. And Unfortunately, there are fake salafi scholars promoting madhabs nowadays, saying the excuse that laymen doesn't have any other option. While laymen could easily ask salafi scholars or easily read salafi books, as albani said. Why should the laymen go and ask madhabi scholars and madhab books, while a stronger opinion is available?
MashAllah brother, thanks for the upload, may Allah bless you. I just dont know why he is labelled as a madhabi or a so called ‘madhab-supporter’. This wording is strange, as i only see him as a man seeking knowledge. Is it just for clarification? JazakAllahu Khair akhi!
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم اَلسَّلاَ مُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَا تُهُ لاحول ولاقوة الا بالله العلي العظيم الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ May the Almighty Lord have Mercy on you, جزاك اللهُ خيرًا سبحان الله I am amazed by the Doctor's question and his demeanor in dealing with the Sheikh. Please forgive me for my knowledge of Islam is next to zero, it's shameful to say I'm like this despite the favor that has been bestowed upon me since my birth, coming from a religious Muslim family for centuries. When I was little my grandmother told me that we are Shafi'. LOL, I didn't even know what that meant, but later on as I am learning about this beautiful Deen, my poor grandmother, may The Lord Almighty have mercy on her, was confused on certain things and unfortunately had Sufi ideology which she was not aware it was Sufism. Believing everything came to existence for the sake of the Prophet, ﷺ and Allah سبحان وتلا is everywhere here in Earth. الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ I am not in India, people say living here in the US, land of the kufr will make you bad, is not true! لا حول ولاقوة إلا بالله He has the power to bring anyone out of darkness into light Even with my little knowledge in the Deen of Islam and in my little intellectual ability, الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ I am to comprehend that we should not have divisions in Islam. However, it's very hard to digest when someone like this guy: ruclips.net/video/tWJD92d1D70/видео.html comes to tell the people that we no longer need the Noble Qur'an and Sunnah because of our traditions and that our scholars have given us enough details of the religion to what Allah سبحان وتلا wants from us. I haven't even gone past 7:34min, سبحان الله the Sabr of this great sheikh in dealing with this Dr who seams to be under the impression that he is so intelligent, maybe due to his degree, unfortunately he has not gained any wisdom, maybe it's due to his lack of understanding the Deen. May the Almighty Lord guide us all and forgive us all, اَمِين, اَمِين يَا رَبَّ الْعَالَمِيْن. الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ عَلَى كُلِّ حَالٍ
is it me or did the sheikh beat about the bush in answering the question of should one follow a madhab? he said it in a way to suggest no you shouldnt follow madhab but that is a contradiction to earlier admission that there are 2 sets of people, those that are scholars and those who are not and only scholars can be mujtahids. and one must be mujtahid to understand the strength and explanations of quran and hadeeth.
Muhammad Mustafiz What Sheikh Al-albani essentially said was that it is not obligatory to follow a mazhab. What was obligatory was to ask the people of knowledge (Ahl Al-Dzikr), whether they are Hanbali, Hanafi, Maliki or Syafi'i.
Muhammad Mustafiz "Allow the haram and further haram to continue" Please explain this, as I don't understand what you mean? "The Wahabi'ist were installed as puppet rulers after the breakup of the khalifa" The Third Saudi state under Abdul Aziz ibn Saud? No doubt, as with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and also the (now defunct) Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq. That doesn't mean the scholars there are corrupt also. In fact, some of the best hadith scholars of today comes from Iraq, such as Sheikh Mahir Yasin Al-Fahl.
Muhammad Mustafiz It wasn't Al-albani who gave the fatwa to allow American Military to build bases in Saudi Arabia. It's Ibn Baz. In fact, Al-albani condemned that fatwa, albeit indirectly. As far as I know, Sheikh Al-albani was very apolitical in nature; he doesn't associate himself with any governments nor political parties.
I am very greatful to o Allah swt to help me recieve such beautiful packets of knowledge. It's a blessing from. Allah to be able to get knowledge and be able to make it a way of our life
As salaam Alaikum Can we get the written transcript of this whole conversation as sometimes reading the video tends to be a little difficult according to the situations. It would be real helpful to have a pdf or document of the conversation transcript. Jazakallah khairan
WOW I'm shocked, Albani really defends being madhabless and comments are praising him, and all these people probably think they are from Ahlel Sunnah. Astaghfirullah, Ya Rabii where is this ummah going? I'm about to cry. People don't follow misguidance, 4 madhabs are the accepted core schools of thought of Ahle Sunnah wal Jamaah.
They are, but here he is not denying that, he is simply saying that the Scholar should not limit himself to learning just one madhab, rather he should learn all 4 and then give fatawa according to the view that is closest to the Quran and Sunnah. As for the layman he cannot study all 4 madahib so he should stick to whatever fatwa he gets from the 4 madahib, from a trusted scholar, but if he is presented a view by a scholar from the other 3 that is closer to the Quran and Sunnah then he should follow that view. This is what I have understood from this debate. May Allah SWT forgive me for my shortcomings and grant us all Jannat Al Firdaus, Ameen.
The sheikh says not to follow a madhab, so if you follow what the sheikh says and follow his advice ,then you following his madhab. In essence a madhab is merely the opinion of a scholar on a particular matter, So whats' the difference six of one or half a dozen of the other, Allah knows best.
No, that’s wrong. following a madhab is following 1 scholar in EVERY aspect of religion. A madhab is not an opinion, it is a way in all or majority of religion. Sheik Ahmad, shafi’i etc ALL said not to follow them blindly and if something in the Quran and sunnah is against them, to follow the Quran and sunnah.
@@monkmodemalik8225 no one is following blindly. Each madhab and each salaf is following what they feel is most correct. There will always be differences of opinions. Imam shafi and hanifa couldnt disprove each other and respected each others opinion.
imaam shafi and imaan hanafi could not disprove each other. Both followed what they believed was the quran and sunnah. This proves that it's not easy to say one proof is stronger than the other. There will always be scholars who will differ on which is stronger. It doesnt matter whether you're a salafi or a madhabi...there will always be different opinions on which proof is stronger. Therefore madhabs will always exist and so will the salafis.
You should ask scholars who answer your question using proof from quran and sunnah and manhaj of companions. Dont ask who just give you an opinion without supporting proof. Even in case of things that need ijtihad try to reach for big scholars who have knowledge.
No one today is near to the taqwa and wisdom of the 4 imaams of the islam And without following them One cannot progress or live through the deen of Allah Without madhab there's no path.. Madhab is the path And no one can engage in hadiths and quran like the 4 imaam does Not even Sheik albani
@@hariss8876 🤦🤦🤦It's aggravating when people say "blindly follow". The scholars othat are following madhahibs are taught and made to understand the reasoning. As for the people "blindly following" it's hard enough to encourage them to pray let alone making them open bukhari and understand it for themselves. For people who don't have time to be a scholar I think them "blindly following" in'shaAllah should be sufficient!
Are the moslims bifeur the 4 imams are gaided or net !!! Ther for we tek from the 4 madhabs and ather madabs like imam thawri an alawzai and alath ibn saad and ... But the must oppen us as moslims is following quran an souna
17:20 As long as you're intelligent enough to be able to differ with the reasoning and intellect of the Imams of the four maddhaahibs and scholars who contribute and tweak the maddhaahibs (may ALLAH have mercy upon them all), and you have the same sincerity and hard work that they put in, maybe then you can start picking and choosing according to the Qur'an and Hadith with your own understanding and abilities to read and research.
As Salamu alaikum Akhi, I think you did the wrong interpretation. It is not upon laymen to pick and chose according to their umderstanding. Rather what he said is that if I as a laymen start following a madhab then I am allowed to do that until a scholar or an imam provides me an evidence from Quran and Sunnah which is stronger or even against what I follow in that Madhab. And if still I follow that particular ruling of a madhab when the truth is crystal clear upon the evidence provided then it is haram and I am upon falsehood. So we can offcourse follow madhabs for time being and can follow a ruling and give preference over another ruling from another madhab. But if the other is crystal clear and in accordance with Quran and sunnah then I shouldn't do that.
@@intekabalom8863 yes your understanding is correct from what I understood too. I don't get how someone can listen and read something that is so basic and crystal clear and completely interpret it the wrong way.
the madhabs were just famous imams from their time. eg abu hanifa was a big and famous imam and people treated him the same way we treat albani. they didnt want a madhab. however they trusted a learned man and his rulings. over time, people preferred his teachings and reasoning. eventually, people who thought a certain way due to the influence of abu hanifa were called hanifis. they compiled and did a lot of work to answer questions for the average person. that's why people who say madhab are pro madhab.
I don't understand why people are making FIRKHA? We all are Ummaties of our Lovely Prophet Muhammad S A W. Allah save us from becoming FIRKHA. I ameen Ya Rabbul Alameen.
The concept is clear and Simple.....Follow Imam Abu Hanifa, Ash Shafai, Malik bin Anas, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, At Thawri, Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, or any one else with proper knowledge of deen.... But when u find a clear cut evidence that a particular ruling of a particular madhab is against the Quran and Sunnah, then it is Waajib for you to reject the ruling..... Are the Imams Infallible? (like the Rafidis make claims of their 12 Imams) Answer: No...Because TO ERR IS HUMAN EVERY SON OF ADAM MAKES MISTAKES AND ALLAH LIKES THOSE YOU REPENT FOR THEIR MISTAKES For example, it is stated in the books of Hanifi Fiqh that it is permissible to offer salah with a dog on your lap, it is not haram to take Riba in Darul Harb, it is not punishable if a man drinks alcohol and he is not unconscious...and many other fatwas..... My intention here is not to point out mistakes in the Hanifi Fiqh but to make my beloved brothers understand that no man acccept the prophet is infallible....So, it is not beffitting for the Ummah of prophet saw to hold fast to a particular madhab especially when u clearly see truth
@I witnessed coronavirusAbout other Madhabs I am not sure of what they said regarding consumption of alcohol and not losing consciousness. But in Hanafi fiqh it is not punishable.
@@intekabalom8863 oh gosh there's no such thing as you say about alcohol May allah bless you with the knowledge Can you show me the reference if I may ask?
I am a bit confused by this video the Sheilh May Allah have Mercy on Him said if someone's starts with Asalamu alaykum wa rahmatullah wa barakaatuhu you should add wa maghfiratuhu in the reply but in the book of Manners this is called as an innovation and to make it more confusing when you go on islamqa they also say its bidah and site the sheikh as reference if someone could clarify it would be appreciated. May Allah make it just a search for the truth, after watching this video I was actually adding "wa maghfiratahu" in reply to the full asalamu alaykum........ until I read the book of Manners. May Allah have Mercy on the Sheikh and accept His efforts for Islam
if salam is like assalamualaikum wa rahmatulla wa barakatuhu then it's sunnah to add wa maghfiratuhu. but it's bidah to add wa maghfiratu if salam is only assalamualaikum. sheikh Albani corrected a student. and allah knows the best. ruclips.net/video/Q1YWV_gHOkg/видео.html
We ask ahlul thikr as in Quran 21 :7... h/e we are to learn the evidence which is linked to TAwhid, Quran 12 :108, and we learn context from the Sahabas RAdiyallahu anhum... 9,100 and we don't reject the evidence for the words of a scholar because that is a means or rejecting the din and shirk as seen in Quran 9,31! we call others to patience and haqq, Surah Asr, and Islam is a preserved faith, Quran 6 :89 or Quran 15 :9!
I have heard of this Shaykh, he's the one who wrote the book about praying like the Prophet (saw). I guess Muslims have been praying incorrectly for 1400 years but now thanks to his book Muslims can pray correctly. I just want to know why suvh a basic thing like the pray can be performed incorrectly for such a long time without being noticed.
Dear brother, Albani never claimed the muslims were praying incorrect for 1400 years, that's your conclusion, however he wanted to make a beneficial book, within it hadeeth he deemed to be most authentic in the way to pray, and nobody is forced to follow it, it's your choice
@Marcelinho Polo Have you read the book? Do you know what references he gives? If you would just read the chapter of prayer in the Hadith collection of for example Bukhari and Muslim, you would see that many people do not pray exactly the way the Prophet salallahu alaihi wasallam prayed. Does that mean that their prayer is invalid? The answer is no, because the prayer has its pillars (like Surah Fatiha, standing if healthy, bowing, standing up, prostrating, being calm in all that and having the right order etc.) without them the prayer is invalid. Then you have the obligatory parts, like saying Takbeer when bowing, sitting for Tashahudd etc, for which you have to make Sujud as Sahu if you miss them, and then you have the Sunnan parts, like raising the hands after bowing, repeating the glorification three times when bowing and prostration etc. If you do not do them, then your prayer is still valid, but it is not exactly like it is transmitted to us by the companions. But tell me know - in your environment have you ever seen normal people going a book of Sunnah to get the most authentic prayer? Then how are you suprised that so many people pray in different ways when instead of harkening to the Sunnah they prefer the way of their forefathers?
@@peopleofknowledge1 Do you have these discussions as PDFs in English so it can be read continuously rather than video with translation. Would save me alot of time and i can benefit from reading more discussions. Jazak Allah Khair
problem is alot of sufis use mathhabs as a cover for bidah. if a non Muslim lies on Quran and Sunnah you have them in front of you. if a sufi lied in the name of mathhab, where is that book in front of you its usually not there. why create an artificial vulnerability, in fact mathhabs teach I am a means to sunnah and follow any hadith i miss on a topic , in context of course. so where is there transparency between Muslims and non Muslims but not between Muslims, especially when Islam is perfect why use the mathhabs wrong and create a vulnerability to promote sufi blind following and bida? this not only opposes the Quran like in Quran 12,108 but the mathhabs as well who say we are only a means to the Sunnah! this opposes the meaning of Muhammadur RAsulalah that our isnad ends with the Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him when able. Look at the book Prophets's prayer by sheikh Albani on the quotes of the 4 mathhabs on how they are a means of unity on sunnah, not division without sunnah as many imams use them and even divided into 4 jamats in their name, thats not Islam, thats cultism. reject cultism and follow the Prophet peace and blessings on him directly as even the 4 mathhabs said! Following the Prophet peace and blessings on him is following perfection, we are human but we aim for the best! 1) Imam Abu Hanifah - whatever is sahih is my mathhab, 2) Imam Malik - Exveryone can be accepted or rejected not the Prophet peace and blessings on him! 3) Imam Shafi - Sunnah reaches and escapes all of us, 4) Imam Ahmad - don't just look to us but see where from the sunnah we take from!
Hah, funny. Ya'all need to either read the book (Laa Madhhabiyya) or hear the debate between sheikh albani and sheikh al-buti. That was the real debate. This is just a question and an answer without a real challenge to Albani
What Albani Rahima'Aallaho said, does he mean we should do away with calling and identifing ourselves with suffixes of Hanafi, Malaki, Shafai, Hanbali, Ahali-Hadith, Salafi....?. I have become fed up with all these sects and Sectarianism. Muslim and Islam is enough and sufficient nomenclature for us to get "hold fast the rope of Allah-Quran and authenticated Sunnat".
Asalamoe Alaikom akhee, what about Imam at-tahawi, because his expertice is based on the expertise of abu hanifah imam al qurtubi who deposit himself completely on the madhab of imam malik ra. imam an-nawawi: because he always continued to apply the Shafi3i madhhab and continued to do so within the framework of this school of thought ijtihad, without departing from the other schools? imam ibn aqil: he was known with the hanbali madhab. Can you answer this or ask it for me, barakAllahoe fiek
Wa alaykum Salam wa rahmatullah akhi if you ask me personally I have no problem with ascribing to a madhab for reference purpose; as the previous scholars did; but they did not make it a religion and oppose stronger evidences; and if they did so then this is what Albani disagrees with and personally I agree.
I agree. If the addilla is clear and strong theres no reason to say my sheikh said. But me, I dont see it as a wrong thing to say I am a Maliki. In morocco, they study the maliki madhab. They say it is important for a talib 3ilm to begin first with one, to undertstand it and than look what other madahib say about this affair. But the madahib also use kitab and sunnah, the difference is only some topics like, zakah, what is fard by lwoedoe etc.
Tahawi was not a muqallid; rather when implied that he was a muqallid he said that only a foolish and ignorant (along those lines) person does taqleed.
Salafies are so funny, if ahle sunnah is what the salafies make it out to be, the majority of the ummah till this day we’re not ahle sunah, after the time of the salaf the minority have always been the sunnis, majority ahle bida, this is so flawed, what happened to the sawaad Atham and the jamaa, let’s just travel back in time, to the Muslim world, 1000 years go, we pass by bukhara, Samarqand, nishapur, jurjaan, farghaana, balkh, Kabul, Herat, khurasaan, khwarezm, merv, urgench, otraar, zurnooj, raay, isbahaan, kermaan, sheeraaz, margheenaan, ghazna, daamghaan, tirmith, tabarastan, hamdaan, Tashkent, shaash, we see (literally) thousands of hanafi scholars (check books of tarajim of hanafi ulema) who are maaturidi or at least don’t Agree with the contemporary salafies in many creedal issues, then go west to Western Asia, Aleppo, Mosul, Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo, Hama, Homs, Jerusalem, Nablus, Tripoli, city after city, filled of shafi ashari scholars, (hanbalis lived relatively in smaller numbers in their own quarters and my no means the majority, either way they were different in creed then modern salafies they didn’t have the tajseem that they now have) go even more west towards the maghrib , qurtuba, Granada, fes, qayruwan, full of Maliki’s with many asharis, with one occasional ibn hazm, go in the future to 400-500 years ago, the pinnacle of the ottomans, go to Cairo Istanbul Sarajevo adrianople Konya tabriz sofia thesolonika tripoli Baghdad hims hama halab every single one following one of the four mathabs, and either ashari hanbali or Maturidi creed, Islam is flourishing like it hadn’t for 800 years, (this time of ibn hajr haytami and mulla ali qari) none of ibn taymiah students alive and still before abd al wahhab, where were the sunnis at this time? Jamaat? Sawaad atham? History destroys salafism, salafies don’t follow the salaf, they mock the salaf every day and don’t realize it, the followers of the mathabs are the real salafies. I listen to salafies all the time and it’s always albani said this ibn uthaymeen said this bin baz said this bakr Abu zaid said this ibn taymiah said this ibn qayyim said this shawkani said this, abd wahhab said this, but it’s the first three the most, like did Islamic history of a millennium and a half only produce 15 scholars half of whom came in the 20th century? ahle sunnah is larger than they make it seem, most scholars of Islamic history did not follow hanbali aqeedah and that’s just a blatant fact, look at the classical books of aqeedah before ibn abd wahhab and look at what aqeedah they followed, It’s a crime against the deen of Allah to kick out the vast majority of scholars of our history from the fold of ahle sunnah, there have literally been millions of hanafi scholars most of whom were Maturidi, just look at the books of tarajim, Badr al din al ayni, kaasaani, margheenaani, zaylai, ibn nujaym, quduri, shurunbulali, ibn hajr haytami, birgivi, nahlaawi, neemawi, abu bakr al hadaad, tahtawi, maydani, attaassi, ibn humam, shaykh nithaam, ibn hajr asqLani, tabreezi, baghawi, halwaani, karkhi, jasaas, Sarakhsi, shaashi, bazdawi, Abdul azeez Bukhari, Abdul ghani Nabloosi, nasafi, mulaajeewan, alkaaki, mulla ali qari, abd al hay lakhnawi, ibn salaah, subki, sakhaawi, suyuti, zarkashi, Iraqi, zurjaani, jurjaani, abd al haq dehlawi abd azeez dehlawi, Shah Waliullah, nawawi, al mahali, saawi, kardari, thahabi, Ibn maaza, kashmeeri, bayquni, mughaltai, Jamal, abu suud, aaluusi, Qadi thanu allah, ibn alaan, tahawi, sinoosi, ghazali, razi, al mawsili, ibn turkmani, turkistani, qadhi iyad, bayhaqi, muhaasibi, jilaani, ibn adham, ibn ata allah, al mahboobi, ibn haajib, raaghib, baaqilani, zarqaani, murtada zabeedi, khassaf, kardari, al Burhaani, qurtubi, ibn aabideen, al qoowni, ghaznawi, samarqandi, ibn baasha, ibn rustum, baydawi, qutlooboughah, daboosi, juwayni, badr al deen ibn jamat, ibn daqeeq, haskafi, al isbeejaabi, hakim shaheed, babarti, al iz ibn abd Salam, alakhseekathi, tahir Patni, ibn maalik, taftazani, ibn ameer haj, gangohi, Ahmad uthmani, baajoori, kandehlvi, quhustaani, qastalaani, maawardi, zaahidi, walwaaliji, ibn juzi, abu hayyan, khaazin, qadhikhan, maziri, qadhi ibn arabi, sahaalawi, raafii, kirmani, ibn saaati and the list goes on but salafies don’t know any scholars, all they know is like 20 scholars of history and never hear about the other millions cause they just ignorant
The ummah needs to go back to the four mathabs, we are seeing the results of leaving the mathabs, modernists and free thinkers have taken advantage of this and have taken from the salafi way, Salafism broke the tradition and since then we have more firaq than we’ve had in all history, all modernists virtually started of as salafies , Salafies broke the door of leaving the tradition an the flood of the rest followed, Salafies cut of the attachment of the ummah to the scholars of the past and attached them to contemporary scholars, then westerners and modernists cut the rest off from the salafi scholars who still are decent Muslims in that they observe niqab, the jamat prayer, beards and pants above ankles etc,
Ashari wrote al ibanah & returned to Hanbali mathhab which Ibn Taymiyyah & Ibn Abdul Wahab followed! we aren't 4 separate dins! They differed in fiqh but are Salafi in Aqidah mostly! People are Sunni but don't know what proof or isnad is, or that it should go back to hadiths to unite. Oh and Salafi aren't tajseem is that is soppose to mean making a "body". Ashari greek philosophy in action already huh?
Allahu do ti shkatërron të gjithë që e ngatërrojn islamin me qëllim që ta shkatërrojn ISLAMIN ky Albani esht shkatërrues i madh keni kujdes vllezer dhe motra ne islam
No one said it is wrong, the Shaykh is saying to not blindly follow an Imam when his madhab or opinion goes against a clear more authentic hadith; and the examples of this are many.
Hi servan, I would like to add a small point, for example, Imaam Malik has direct chain to Omar (R) thru Abdullah ibn Omar (R) and to Abdullah ibn Abbas (R) thru Urwa ibn Zubayr among other chains. Hence when ppl say which madhab did Omar R or Abdullah ibn Abbas follow is a foolish statement, as knowledge flows downwards and not upwards, and in fact following Malaki School would mean following prophet Mohammad (S) through Omar R and Abdulllah ibn Abbas among other Sahabas, or following Hanafi School would mean following prophet Mohammad (S) thought Abdullah ibn Masood (R).
@@kledmohd4230 It's not. Following Imam malik only means following Imam Malik, not Ibn Umar. Why? Because Imam Malik not just recorded what he got, he did ijthihad and tried to form fatwa from them. As we all know, no scholar is free from mistakes in his ijthihad and hence there is no reason to follow a mistaken ijthihad when it is clear that it was a mistake.
" Anti-Madhabism: A Bridge to Irreligion " Muammed Zahid Al-Kawthari Anti-madhabism never gets muslims united. On the contrary ,it causes billions of mazhabs and chaos. Because everybody would follow the mazhab "i understand like that". Christians lived the same process and ended up to be secular people and have more sects. Westerners have been supporting anti-mazhabism in islam to make muslims get divided into more pieces and to spread secularism. It sounds good at first "oh bro dont follow anybody blindly ,just follow quran and hadith". But It s a big trap to deceive muslims. Indeed,many people who accuse muslims of following 4 imams blindly and say "we dont follow imams blindly ,we follow quran and sunnah only" follow a couple of modern scholars who came up with the colonization of muslims' lands. Following only text is not the methodology of ahli sunnah. Mazhabs which started with their imams and their disciples, accumulated over time a vast scholarship composed by the successing scholars. People who read some about the history of modern europe (christianity after Protestantism, modern philosophers ,capitalism) can see the relationship between anti-mazhabism and secularism-individualism-capitalism.
The Sahaba were ijtehadi but they have different opinions also and it's still permitted but the scholars of today can't reach the level of Sahaba, tabi and tabi'un, the best 3 generation ever in history mentioned in ahadith and Imam Abu Hanafi was tabi and i think the rest were tabi'un as they were born later.. SO we should trust their knowledge and opinions and their opinions go back to the sahaba and they have the fatwa if any of our opinion goes against the Quran and sunnah then throw it on the wall...
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Shaykh Albani seems like a very very cute wholesome knowledgeable grandfather❤️... May Allah grant him the highest level of Jannah❤️
I've been looking for the tapes of Al albani for so long, now that you are uploading please carry on, They are so good, Jazakallah khayr
❤️
When the shiekh speaks, you hear nothing but pure knowledge. May Allah have Mercy on our Shiekh
problem is alot of sufis use mathhabs as a cover for bidah. if a non Muslim lies on Quran and Sunnah you have them in front of you. if a sufi lied in the name of mathhab, where is that book in front of you its usually not there. why create an artificial vulnerability, in fact mathhabs teach I am a means to sunnah and follow any hadith i miss on a topic , in context of course. so where is there transparency between Muslims and non Muslims but not between Muslims, especially when Islam is perfect why use the mathhabs wrong and create a vulnerability to promote sufi blind following and bida? this not only opposes the Quran like in Quran 12,108 but the mathhabs as well who say we are only a means to the Sunnah! this opposes the meaning of Muhammadur RAsulalah that our isnad ends with the Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him when able.
Look at the book Prophets's prayer by sheikh Albani on the quotes of the 4 mathhabs on how they are a means of unity on sunnah, not division without sunnah as many imams use them and even divided into 4 jamats in their name, thats not Islam, thats cultism. reject cultism and follow the Prophet peace and blessings on him directly as even the 4 mathhabs said! Following the Prophet peace and blessings on him is following perfection, we are human but we aim for the best!
1) Imam Abu Hanifah - whatever is sahih is my mathhab,
2) Imam Malik - Exveryone can be accepted or rejected not the Prophet peace and blessings on him!
3) Imam Shafi - Sunnah reaches and escapes all of us,
4) Imam Ahmad - don't just look to us but see where from the sunnah we take from!
Amiyn
"The sufis use mathhabs as a cover for bidah". LOL! The only real problem here is with you, and the dubious sources from which you get your "knowledge".
...and the hundreds of other great Shaykhs who preceded him. Ameen.
@Faizal Abubaker LOL! What planet are you living on? Here's a little homework problem for you: do a little bit of research and make a list yourself. Hint: Start in chronological order from the time of the Prophet (as) and for each shaykh note down which shaykhs he learnt from, which school of thought he followed if applicable and also which tariqah, if applicable. Perhaps also make a note of the works which they are famous for and why they wrote them. Maybe you will learn something you didn't know before and more importantly realise how foolish your question is and how tunnel-visioned your current thinking is.
Subhanallah. How miraculous these tapes can now be played infinitely for all to breathe in the beauty and purity of Shaykh Albani’s wisdom, patience and eloquence. Masyallah, these tapes teach scholars and non-scholars alike.
Thank you sir for uploading and put in english. Thanks again. May allah bless you. Aameen.
Shaykh is a champ in logical Reasoning. May ALLAH SWT give him JANNAT-UL-FIRDOUS
Imam Malik may Allah Ta’ala be pleased with him is reported to have said “learn good manners before seeking knowledge”
Something to ponder over greatly in this day age.
May Allah swt grant sheikh highest level of Jannah.❤️
Alhamdullillah we are following islam regarding with madhab,it help to follow islam properly with quran and sunnah of prophet ﷺ.May Allah guide you All
Gems. Pure gems. Alhamdulillah ya rabb
JazakaAllah khair. Keep uploading these videos
SubhanAllah he made the topic so easy to understand!! For decades now this has been a topic of discussion amongst the youth in my lifetime. Yet here, the shaykh (الله يرحمه) made it so easy in a matter of minutes!!
Albany is a deciever
Albani is using fallacious logic. He is saying reject the madhab and agree with ME! As all Salafi scholars expect blind Taqlid from their Salafi laymen.
@@ibbydread6092 ya kadhab! What a slandered you are!
May Allah guide you.
@@ibbydread6092 he didn't say that.
What I understood is he basically said follow whoever gives you better proof.
Proof = Allah said, The Messenger (saw) said which is Quran and Sunnah.
Barak Allah feek, I'm in treat with his humble way treating questioner, very rare to find, every word by shaikh is pure wisdom.
Albany caused devision in islam
@@viewkallo astaghfirullah
@@viewkallo which division?
May Allah save all common 'layman' Muslims from confusion in the matter of Deen and hold them firmly onto one amongst the well established 4 school of thoughts of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaat of our pious Salaf i.e. the schools of the 4 Imams of the Ahlus Sunnah. There is a reason y all of these 4 schools have been deemed correct as they dealt with and have solutions of all the known and established matters of Deen and Shariah and therefore the door of Ijtihaad was closed on these matters centuries back when majority of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah back then after the Imams studied, understood and came to a conclusion that all the matters have been covered by the school of these Imams and the Hadith evidence used in all the rulings cannot be argued against n thus all of them are correct. Ijtihaad thus is only required for new matters that keep coming up with time and rulings on these new matters are given based upon the well established Usuul e Deen. N these Usuul e Deen themselves just to b clear in all these schools of thought are based upon the understanding of the great Imams of how the Sahaba RA and the Tabaeen used to deduce rulings on matters with the knowledge of all the acts, teachings and sayings of Rasulullah SAW available to them.
At the end of the day, it's about deciding whether you want to follow your own analysis or the analysis of the 4 imams who were from the Salaf us Saliheen.
Jazak Allahu khair brother
From U. K
What a great companion he was for this ummah (Rahimahullah)
albany is not a companion
May Allah bless Imam Al Albani and grant him Jannatul Firdous. Aameen
Following an Ijteehad of a scholar is in essence following the way of the sunnah given the scholar avoids bida,shirk and is on sound aqeeda and is upon the (4 school of thoughts) moreover how any scholar of any of these 4 school of thoughts come to conclusion is called usool ( method of deriving a ruling) This is where differences of opinion arises such differences existed during the first 3 generations. So for anyone ( with all due respect to each and everyone of them)to claim following opinions of any of those usool i.e method so long as they meet the prerequisites of correct aqeeda, and Tawhid are not from the people of the sunnah fails to see the very opinion they are promoting of obeying sunnah and to ask the scholars for opinion regarding any given matter. May God protect every believer and forgive those on earth and those who have departed laymen or scholars.
As Salaam alaikum
In every generation there are people who would strive to remain as close to quran and hadeeth as possible. And there would be a group of people who would try to justify their position.
We need to ask ourselves, to which group do we belong.
Companions of our beloved prophet would instantaneously resort to a position where stronger evidence were brought.
This conversation shouldn't have been that complicated 😄
Jazak Allah khayr. Also, I think there was a mistake at 15:10. It should say Albani not Madhabi, as it was shaykh al Albani speaking I think
By Allah, Islam is so deep and profound .
May Allah have mercy of Allamah Nasiruddin Al-Albani ❤
15:25 onwards is more outstanding reply
جزاك الله خيرا ❤️
I read the comments, then saw the video. The comments make it seem like this video is absolutely golden... but i watched it and it was only a simple discussion, with a lot of side-discussed which swayed from the main discussion.
Skip to 14 minutes for the more relevant parts. The first 14 minutes was just a bit of jostling between the questioner and questioned.
That’s why it’s better to watch then read the comments, sometimes you can get high expectations then when you watch it... not at all. Lol
LoL? whats so funny about this. Fear All-llah in everything u write. Do u even know who was Shaykh Albani rahimeullah
Allahu alem if this answered the question Muslims continue to ask. The issue of following a Madhab as a framework is surely the best way - it is not following blindly as they are all based on evidences and the manner in which the evidences are graded is also different within each school (so the notion of rejecting an opinion if a stronger opinion is presented is also open to interpretation).
If anything the Sheikh confirmed what Scholars have said for centuries, nobody is saying to blindly follow, so I am confused as to where this idea arises from? Is it also not a form of taqlid to follow those who say not to follow an established school of thought, developed over centuries with access to sources and people who were close to the early Muslims?
Again, how can the average Muslim (i.e.99.99%) live their Islam without a framework? How would an average person know if this opinion is right over the other, when another Scholar says otherwise? The tide has turned back to referring to established schools as 1400 years of scholarship cannot be wrong, and away from this confusion. I reiterate, the fact these questions are being repeatedly asked, is surely evidence that following an established framework is the safest option. Wa Allah Alem.
As Salaamu Alaikum According to consensus of the scholars it is Obligatory for a laymen to follow a methaab this Salafi nonsense destroy the islamic community in America base of Al Abaani understanding of the deen
Exactly
The Idea is madhhabs exist to guide people to following Islam properly. But if you do not know something, do you check the madhab or the quran/sunnah, if you check with your madhhab over the words of Allah and Muhammed(SAW) then you simply are a slave to the madhhab and not Islam. Madhhab is for reference not a Rulebook. Quran is the Rulebook.
I did not mean to offend anyone. I agree that you see someone following a madhhab is better for a layman as you have easier access to it, but it is not greater than following the Quran and Sunnah, the precise way the Prophet has taught Islam, the religion of Allah. The way it was meant to be followed.
You said the truth brother
Allah bless you
He did not say to leave the framework of madhab but to leave following opinion blindly . He only ask ulema to follow quran and sunnah and manhaj alsalf so they guid layman accordingly. For layman they should not ask about madhab opinion but to ask for evidence from quran, sunnah. And salf manhaj.
Regarding ijtahad matter you seek what most big ulema say about the matter also according to Quran, sunnah and manhaj alsalf.
جزاك الله خير
The Shaykh’s logic falls over on itself. If it’s an obligation on a lay person to ask a person of knowledge, and he acts upon the answer, that entails putting trust into that scholars opinion. So what is the difference between that, and a person taking from the madhhabs? In both cases, the lay person is following a person of knowledge.
I don't think the Shaykh is opposed to following a madhab. I think the discussion was more about it shouldn't be obligatory to follow a madhab and that it shouldn't be obligatory to follow one madhab exclusively. This is because there were Muslims before the madhabs that would have died as Muslims. He's refuting people that say 'you HAVE to follow a madhab and HAVE to follow everything from that single madhab or your Islam is wrong'
The Idea is sometimes a madhhab has a different answer to a problem compared to the Quran and Sunnah(which is greater that the opinion of a Sheikh). He says to follow the Quran and Sunnah and when it comes to doubtful subjects ask a scholar, it may be Sheikh Al-Albani or Sheikh Ahmed ibn Hanbal. Since both are scholars.
TLDR: No need for opinions on matters regarding which Allah has already addressed. As you may know the Hanafis pray dhuhr and asr at a later time than the time intended for it by God. So Here we follow the Quran over the Madhhabs, as their existence(the madhhabs) is to help us follow the quran.
@@LegitMHx the madhahib make sure there are no transgressions.
They are a safe hold for the Muslims who came after.
To move out of the madhahib means to move on thin ice.
@@LegitMHx *you have to follow a madhab and have to follow everything from that single madhab or your Islam is wrong"
Who claimed that.
Where?
Show me.
@@diefaust4252 I believe some people might actually think that. It's not like I have a source to tell you, I'm just trying to explain what the Shaykh was saying
@ 15:16 its is albani that speaks not the madhabi
A mountain of knowledge acting as a pile of mud what manners and humility May Allah have mercy on him and guide us to the straight path
Pure Gold, rahima allaho achaikh.
Subhan Allah!
Albani is right. And it is common sense that Madhabs must be rejecyed on areas where it directly opposes Allah and our prophet.
Unfortunately i know some malikis who are fine with dogs saliva, even though its against rest of the three madhabs and salaf and hadeeths. Thats what madhabs does. Its another religion.
And Unfortunately, there are fake salafi scholars promoting madhabs nowadays, saying the excuse that laymen doesn't have any other option.
While laymen could easily ask salafi scholars or easily read salafi books, as albani said. Why should the laymen go and ask madhabi scholars and madhab books, while a stronger opinion is available?
Nothing wrong with having a madhab.
It is doubtful if you don't have madhab
MashAllah brother, thanks for the upload, may Allah bless you. I just dont know why he is labelled as a madhabi or a so called ‘madhab-supporter’. This wording is strange, as i only see him as a man seeking knowledge. Is it just for clarification? JazakAllahu Khair akhi!
Barak Allah feekom
Beautiful answer. This is exactly how I understood it without ever asking someone.
Jader Shine wauw. That makes you a genius!!!!
جزاك الله خيرًا
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
اَلسَّلاَ مُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَا تُهُ
لاحول ولاقوة الا بالله العلي العظيم
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ
May the Almighty Lord have Mercy on you,
جزاك اللهُ خيرًا
سبحان الله
I am amazed by the Doctor's question and his demeanor in dealing with the Sheikh.
Please forgive me for my knowledge of Islam is next to zero, it's shameful to say I'm like this despite the favor that has been bestowed upon me since my birth, coming from a religious Muslim family for centuries.
When I was little my grandmother told me that we are Shafi'. LOL, I didn't even know what that meant, but later on as I am learning about this beautiful Deen, my poor grandmother, may The Lord Almighty have mercy on her, was confused on certain things and unfortunately had Sufi ideology which she was not aware it was Sufism. Believing everything came to existence for the sake of the Prophet, ﷺ and Allah سبحان وتلا
is everywhere here in Earth.
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ
I am not in India, people say living here in the US, land of the kufr will make you bad, is not true!
لا حول ولاقوة إلا بالله He has the power to bring anyone out of darkness into light
Even with my little knowledge in the Deen of Islam and in my little intellectual ability, الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ I am to comprehend that we should not have divisions in Islam.
However, it's very hard to digest when someone like this guy:
ruclips.net/video/tWJD92d1D70/видео.html
comes to tell the people that we no longer need the Noble Qur'an and Sunnah because of our traditions and that our scholars have given us enough details of the religion to what Allah سبحان وتلا wants from us.
I haven't even gone past 7:34min, سبحان الله the Sabr of this great sheikh in dealing with this Dr who seams to be under the impression that he is so intelligent, maybe due to his degree, unfortunately he has not gained any wisdom, maybe it's due to his lack of understanding the Deen.
May the Almighty Lord guide us all and forgive us all,
اَمِين, اَمِين يَا رَبَّ الْعَالَمِيْن.
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ عَلَى كُلِّ حَالٍ
is it me or did the sheikh beat about the bush in answering the question of should one follow a madhab?
he said it in a way to suggest no you shouldnt follow madhab but that is a contradiction to earlier admission that there are 2 sets of people, those that are scholars and those who are not and only scholars can be mujtahids. and one must be mujtahid to understand the strength and explanations of quran and hadeeth.
Muhammad Mustafiz
What Sheikh Al-albani essentially said was that it is not obligatory to follow a mazhab.
What was obligatory was to ask the people of knowledge (Ahl Al-Dzikr), whether they are Hanbali, Hanafi, Maliki or Syafi'i.
Muhammad Mustafiz
"Allow the haram and further haram to continue"
Please explain this, as I don't understand what you mean?
"The Wahabi'ist were installed as puppet rulers after the breakup of the khalifa"
The Third Saudi state under Abdul Aziz ibn Saud? No doubt, as with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and also the (now defunct) Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq.
That doesn't mean the scholars there are corrupt also. In fact, some of the best hadith scholars of today comes from Iraq, such as Sheikh Mahir Yasin Al-Fahl.
Muhammad Mustafiz
It wasn't Al-albani who gave the fatwa to allow American Military to build bases in Saudi Arabia. It's Ibn Baz. In fact, Al-albani condemned that fatwa, albeit indirectly.
As far as I know, Sheikh Al-albani was very apolitical in nature; he doesn't associate himself with any governments nor political parties.
suriamarsuli you are correct. Jazakallah
Farooq Pakistani he asked a simple question no reason for insults. He just isnt blind following and asks about a matter he didnt understand correctly
Please admin upload more of their video
I am very greatful to o Allah swt to help me recieve such beautiful packets of knowledge. It's a blessing from. Allah to be able to get knowledge and be able to make it a way of our life
Jazakallahukhairan!
Sheikh Albani, i never find myself disagreeing with him in Aqeedah or major fiqhi issues.
رحمة الله عليه
As salaam Alaikum
Can we get the written transcript of this whole conversation as sometimes reading the video tends to be a little difficult according to the situations.
It would be real helpful to have a pdf or document of the conversation transcript.
Jazakallah khairan
Write it down
WOW I'm shocked, Albani really defends being madhabless and comments are praising him, and all these people probably think they are from Ahlel Sunnah. Astaghfirullah, Ya Rabii where is this ummah going? I'm about to cry. People don't follow misguidance, 4 madhabs are the accepted core schools of thought of Ahle Sunnah wal Jamaah.
Albani wrote book in madhab Hambali and praise Imam Hanbal in it.
They are, but here he is not denying that, he is simply saying that the Scholar should not limit himself to learning just one madhab, rather he should learn all 4 and then give fatawa according to the view that is closest to the Quran and Sunnah. As for the layman he cannot study all 4 madahib so he should stick to whatever fatwa he gets from the 4 madahib, from a trusted scholar, but if he is presented a view by a scholar from the other 3 that is closer to the Quran and Sunnah then he should follow that view. This is what I have understood from this debate. May Allah SWT forgive me for my shortcomings and grant us all Jannat Al Firdaus, Ameen.
#pls upload more videos like this!!
The doctor sounds like Muhammad Arifi
Exactly
العـِلم قال الله قال رسولـه *** قال الصحـابة ليس بالتمويه
ما العلم نصبك للخلاف سفاهة *** بين الرسول وبين رأى فقيه
may ALLAAH gives the sheikh his best...ameen
The sheikh says not to follow a madhab, so if you follow what the sheikh says and follow his advice ,then you following his madhab. In essence a madhab is merely the opinion of a scholar on a particular matter, So whats' the difference six of one or half a dozen of the other, Allah knows best.
No, that’s wrong. following a madhab is following 1 scholar in EVERY aspect of religion. A madhab is not an opinion, it is a way in all or majority of religion.
Sheik Ahmad, shafi’i etc ALL said not to follow them blindly and if something in the Quran and sunnah is against them, to follow the Quran and sunnah.
@@monkmodemalik8225 no one is following blindly. Each madhab and each salaf is following what they feel is most correct. There will always be differences of opinions. Imam shafi and hanifa couldnt disprove each other and respected each others opinion.
No one today is equal to the 4 imaams
And no one can be till aakhirah
That's the truth
السلام عليكم! i follow the SCHOO of our RABB ONLY !!! ALLAHU AKBAR! ALHAMDULILLAH! SUBHANALLAH !
imaam shafi and imaan hanafi could not disprove each other. Both followed what they believed was the quran and sunnah. This proves that it's not easy to say one proof is stronger than the other. There will always be scholars who will differ on which is stronger. It doesnt matter whether you're a salafi or a madhabi...there will always be different opinions on which proof is stronger. Therefore madhabs will always exist and so will the salafis.
May Allaah azza wa jall grant the shaykh highest rank in paradise Aameen
assalamu aleykum السلام عليكم
Shukran Jaziilan Jazaakallahu Khayran
'Madhhab supporter' = Every single Muslim up until 40 years ago.
ASSAALAMU ALAIKUM. brother can i download this video and use it with your credit?
The main question is which scholars we should ask as long as they themselves are dividend.
You should ask scholars who answer your question using proof from quran and sunnah and manhaj of companions. Dont ask who just give you an opinion without supporting proof. Even in case of things that need ijtihad try to reach for big scholars who have knowledge.
play on 1.5x speed
No one today is near to the taqwa and wisdom of the 4 imaams of the islam
And without following them
One cannot progress or live through the deen of Allah
Without madhab there's no path..
Madhab is the path
And no one can engage in hadiths and quran like the 4 imaam does
Not even Sheik albani
@@hariss8876 🤦🤦🤦It's aggravating when people say "blindly follow". The scholars othat are following madhahibs are taught and made to understand the reasoning. As for the people "blindly following" it's hard enough to encourage them to pray let alone making them open bukhari and understand it for themselves. For people who don't have time to be a scholar I think them "blindly following" in'shaAllah should be sufficient!
Are the moslims bifeur the 4 imams are gaided or net !!! Ther for we tek from the 4 madhabs and ather madabs like imam thawri an alawzai and alath ibn saad and ... But the must oppen us as moslims is following quran an souna
Maasha Allah, what a great explanation by Shaikh AlBani, Raheemallah? Jazakallahukhairan
17:20 As long as you're intelligent enough to be able to differ with the reasoning and intellect of the Imams of the four maddhaahibs and scholars who contribute and tweak the maddhaahibs (may ALLAH have mercy upon them all), and you have the same sincerity and hard work that they put in, maybe then you can start picking and choosing according to the Qur'an and Hadith with your own understanding and abilities to read and research.
As Salamu alaikum Akhi,
I think you did the wrong interpretation. It is not upon laymen to pick and chose according to their umderstanding. Rather what he said is that if I as a laymen start following a madhab then I am allowed to do that until a scholar or an imam provides me an evidence from Quran and Sunnah which is stronger or even against what I follow in that Madhab. And if still I follow that particular ruling of a madhab when the truth is crystal clear upon the evidence provided then it is haram and I am upon falsehood.
So we can offcourse follow madhabs for time being and can follow a ruling and give preference over another ruling from another madhab. But if the other is crystal clear and in accordance with Quran and sunnah then I shouldn't do that.
@@intekabalom8863 yes your understanding is correct from what I understood too.
I don't get how someone can listen and read something that is so basic and crystal clear and completely interpret it the wrong way.
the madhabs were just famous imams from their time. eg abu hanifa was a big and famous imam and people treated him the same way we treat albani. they didnt want a madhab. however they trusted a learned man and his rulings. over time, people preferred his teachings and reasoning. eventually, people who thought a certain way due to the influence of abu hanifa were called hanifis. they compiled and did a lot of work to answer questions for the average person. that's why people who say madhab are pro madhab.
I'm a Madhabi but I love sheikh Al albani
I don't understand why people are making FIRKHA? We all are Ummaties of our Lovely Prophet Muhammad S A W. Allah save us from becoming FIRKHA. I ameen Ya Rabbul Alameen.
Beautiful
The concept is clear and Simple.....Follow Imam Abu Hanifa, Ash Shafai, Malik bin Anas, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, At Thawri, Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, or any one else with proper knowledge of deen....
But when u find a clear cut evidence that a particular ruling of a particular madhab is against the Quran and Sunnah, then it is Waajib for you to reject the ruling.....
Are the Imams Infallible? (like the Rafidis make claims of their 12 Imams)
Answer: No...Because TO ERR IS HUMAN
EVERY SON OF ADAM MAKES MISTAKES AND ALLAH LIKES THOSE YOU REPENT FOR THEIR MISTAKES
For example, it is stated in the books of Hanifi Fiqh that it is permissible to offer salah with a dog on your lap, it is not haram to take Riba in Darul Harb, it is not punishable if a man drinks alcohol and he is not unconscious...and many other fatwas.....
My intention here is not to point out mistakes in the Hanifi Fiqh but to make my beloved brothers understand that no man acccept the prophet is infallible....So, it is not beffitting for the Ummah of prophet saw to hold fast to a particular madhab especially when u clearly see truth
@I witnessed coronavirusAbout other Madhabs I am not sure of what they said regarding consumption of alcohol and not losing consciousness. But in Hanafi fiqh it is not punishable.
@@intekabalom8863 oh gosh there's no such thing as you say about alcohol
May allah bless you with the knowledge
Can you show me the reference if I may ask?
People act like the scholars ,or students of the madhaahib don’t take from the Quran and Sunnah smh 🤦🏾♂️
You are the deluded ones
ما شاء الله. إنني أحب ذلك. جزاك الله خير
this is not a madhab supporter looks like he wants to remove the 4 madhabs
Well said
This is not a debate.
I agree it is a lesson
I am a bit confused by this video the Sheilh May Allah have Mercy on Him said if someone's starts with Asalamu alaykum wa rahmatullah wa barakaatuhu you should add wa maghfiratuhu in the reply but in the book of Manners this is called as an innovation and to make it more confusing when you go on islamqa they also say its bidah and site the sheikh as reference if someone could clarify it would be appreciated. May Allah make it just a search for the truth, after watching this video I was actually adding "wa maghfiratahu" in reply to the full asalamu alaykum........ until I read the book of Manners. May Allah have Mercy on the Sheikh and accept His efforts for Islam
if salam is like assalamualaikum wa rahmatulla wa barakatuhu then it's sunnah to add wa maghfiratuhu. but it's bidah to add wa maghfiratu if salam is only assalamualaikum. sheikh Albani corrected a student.
and allah knows the best.
ruclips.net/video/Q1YWV_gHOkg/видео.html
We ask ahlul thikr as in Quran 21 :7... h/e we are to learn the evidence which is linked to TAwhid, Quran 12 :108, and we learn context from the Sahabas RAdiyallahu anhum... 9,100 and we don't reject the evidence for the words of a scholar because that is a means or rejecting the din and shirk as seen in Quran 9,31! we call others to patience and haqq, Surah Asr, and Islam is a preserved faith, Quran 6 :89 or Quran 15 :9!
Lover of Hazrat Albani (R) actually follow him as their way to understanding Islam. So it is their mazhab.
Show the bouti one😂he got refuted
ما شاء الله
I have heard of this Shaykh, he's the one who wrote the book about praying like the Prophet (saw).
I guess Muslims have been praying incorrectly for 1400 years but now thanks to his book Muslims can pray correctly. I just want to know why suvh a basic thing like the pray can be performed incorrectly for such a long time without being noticed.
Dear brother, Albani never claimed the muslims were praying incorrect for 1400 years, that's your conclusion, however he wanted to make a beneficial book, within it hadeeth he deemed to be most authentic in the way to pray, and nobody is forced to follow it, it's your choice
@Marcelinho Polo Have you read the book? Do you know what references he gives? If you would just read the chapter of prayer in the Hadith collection of for example Bukhari and Muslim, you would see that many people do not pray exactly the way the Prophet salallahu alaihi wasallam prayed. Does that mean that their prayer is invalid? The answer is no, because the prayer has its pillars (like Surah Fatiha, standing if healthy, bowing, standing up, prostrating, being calm in all that and having the right order etc.) without them the prayer is invalid. Then you have the obligatory parts, like saying Takbeer when bowing, sitting for Tashahudd etc, for which you have to make Sujud as Sahu if you miss them, and then you have the Sunnan parts, like raising the hands after bowing, repeating the glorification three times when bowing and prostration etc. If you do not do them, then your prayer is still valid, but it is not exactly like it is transmitted to us by the companions.
But tell me know - in your environment have you ever seen normal people going a book of Sunnah to get the most authentic prayer? Then how are you suprised that so many people pray in different ways when instead of harkening to the Sunnah they prefer the way of their forefathers?
@@peopleofknowledge1
Do you have these discussions as PDFs in English so it can be read continuously rather than video with translation. Would save me alot of time and i can benefit from reading more discussions.
Jazak Allah Khair
@@peopleofknowledge1 ' within it HE deemed to be most authentic'.
Why should we follow sheikh Albanis r.a opinions and dismiss the imams?
There's no authentic book like bukhari and there's nothing more perfect path and methods like madhabs
All others are something else
The "Madhabi" calls Shaykh Albanee rahimullah "Shaykh".
its called respect,maybe you pseudo salafis should learn that
Parental Guardian Maybe you should learn manners. The way you conduct yourself is that of an ill-mannered person.
@Parental Guardian6 its called respect,maybe you pseudo salafis should learn that. @Parental Guidance.Your parents failed to guide you.
@ What's wrong about being a Salaf? It's the saved sect Akhi, stop spreading Fitnah.
@ By the way you conduct yourself, it's clear to say you're definitely following a deviant sect.
problem is alot of sufis use mathhabs as a cover for bidah. if a non Muslim lies on Quran and Sunnah you have them in front of you. if a sufi lied in the name of mathhab, where is that book in front of you its usually not there. why create an artificial vulnerability, in fact mathhabs teach I am a means to sunnah and follow any hadith i miss on a topic , in context of course. so where is there transparency between Muslims and non Muslims but not between Muslims, especially when Islam is perfect why use the mathhabs wrong and create a vulnerability to promote sufi blind following and bida? this not only opposes the Quran like in Quran 12,108 but the mathhabs as well who say we are only a means to the Sunnah! this opposes the meaning of Muhammadur RAsulalah that our isnad ends with the Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him when able.
Look at the book Prophets's prayer by sheikh Albani on the quotes of the 4 mathhabs on how they are a means of unity on sunnah, not division without sunnah as many imams use them and even divided into 4 jamats in their name, thats not Islam, thats cultism. reject cultism and follow the Prophet peace and blessings on him directly as even the 4 mathhabs said! Following the Prophet peace and blessings on him is following perfection, we are human but we aim for the best!
1) Imam Abu Hanifah - whatever is sahih is my mathhab,
2) Imam Malik - Exveryone can be accepted or rejected not the Prophet peace and blessings on him!
3) Imam Shafi - Sunnah reaches and escapes all of us,
4) Imam Ahmad - don't just look to us but see where from the sunnah we take from!
Hah, funny. Ya'all need to either read the book (Laa Madhhabiyya) or hear the debate between sheikh albani and sheikh al-buti. That was the real debate. This is just a question and an answer without a real challenge to Albani
What Albani Rahima'Aallaho said, does he mean we should do away with calling and identifing ourselves with suffixes of Hanafi, Malaki, Shafai, Hanbali, Ahali-Hadith, Salafi....?. I have become fed up with all these sects and Sectarianism. Muslim and Islam is enough and sufficient nomenclature for us to get "hold fast the rope of Allah-Quran and authenticated Sunnat".
How come salafi scholars are always so negative and rhetorical. Why not just answer the man's question
Becapuse henis not a grave worshiper, like you who blindly follows everything
Asalamoe Alaikom akhee,
what about Imam at-tahawi, because his expertice is based on the expertise of abu hanifah
imam al qurtubi who deposit himself completely on the madhab of imam malik ra.
imam an-nawawi: because he always continued to apply the Shafi3i madhhab and continued to do so within the framework of this school of thought ijtihad, without departing from the other schools?
imam ibn aqil: he was known with the hanbali madhab.
Can you answer this or ask it for me, barakAllahoe fiek
Wa alaykum Salam wa rahmatullah akhi if you ask me personally I have no problem with ascribing to a madhab for reference purpose; as the previous scholars did; but they did not make it a religion and oppose stronger evidences; and if they did so then this is what Albani disagrees with and personally I agree.
Oh sobhanAllah, me personally also.
I agree. If the addilla is clear and strong theres no reason to say my sheikh said. But me, I dont see it as a wrong thing to say I am a Maliki. In morocco, they study the maliki madhab. They say it is important for a talib 3ilm to begin first with one, to undertstand it and than look what other madahib say about this affair. But the madahib also use kitab and sunnah, the difference is only some topics like, zakah, what is fard by lwoedoe etc.
Mat.H.G بارك الله فيك و أعزك الله تعالى
Tahawi was not a muqallid; rather when implied that he was a muqallid he said that only a foolish and ignorant (along those lines) person does taqleed.
I know someone who calls them self Salafi they are layman and they refuse to follow a madhab. Now who is to blame for their ignorant position?
Did you even watch and listen and read the video! Wallahi it's so clear! I suggest you watch it again akhi
Why am I unable to download this video?
How do you download videos
@@discordalt1724 you need RUclips premium
@@discordalt1724 or you can do youtube to mp4 or mp3 convertor and place the url of this video I to there and download it.
@@discordalt1724 it's downloadable in the Indian subcontinent, I guess - due to limitations in the access of the internet.
There are ads on this video with music
Again, RUclips forces ads for audio/video that is copyrighted. Allahu' Musta'an
@@peopleofknowledge1 ok👍
The questioner sounds like Mohamad al-Arefe. Is that him?
moes boes no akhi. ..it's a syrian doctor
❤Search miracles of the holy "Quran" / "Qadir khutba"
🌹😊
Salafism Is the latest and the fifth mazhab that's the most you can say
Salafies are so funny, if ahle sunnah is what the salafies make it out to be, the majority of the ummah till this day we’re not ahle sunah, after the time of the salaf the minority have always been the sunnis, majority ahle bida, this is so flawed, what happened to the sawaad Atham and the jamaa, let’s just travel back in time, to the Muslim world, 1000 years go, we pass by bukhara, Samarqand, nishapur, jurjaan, farghaana, balkh, Kabul, Herat, khurasaan, khwarezm, merv, urgench, otraar, zurnooj, raay, isbahaan, kermaan, sheeraaz, margheenaan, ghazna, daamghaan, tirmith, tabarastan, hamdaan, Tashkent, shaash, we see (literally) thousands of hanafi scholars (check books of tarajim of hanafi ulema) who are maaturidi or at least don’t Agree with the contemporary salafies in many creedal issues, then go west to Western Asia, Aleppo, Mosul, Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo, Hama, Homs, Jerusalem, Nablus, Tripoli, city after city, filled of shafi ashari scholars, (hanbalis lived relatively in smaller numbers in their own quarters and my no means the majority, either way they were different in creed then modern salafies they didn’t have the tajseem that they now have) go even more west towards the maghrib , qurtuba, Granada, fes, qayruwan, full of Maliki’s with many asharis, with one occasional ibn hazm, go in the future to 400-500 years ago, the pinnacle of the ottomans, go to Cairo Istanbul Sarajevo adrianople Konya tabriz sofia thesolonika tripoli Baghdad hims hama halab every single one following one of the four mathabs, and either ashari hanbali or Maturidi creed, Islam is flourishing like it hadn’t for 800 years, (this time of ibn hajr haytami and mulla ali qari) none of ibn taymiah students alive and still before abd al wahhab, where were the sunnis at this time? Jamaat? Sawaad atham? History destroys salafism, salafies don’t follow the salaf, they mock the salaf every day and don’t realize it, the followers of the mathabs are the real salafies.
I listen to salafies all the time and it’s always albani said this ibn uthaymeen said this bin baz said this bakr Abu zaid said this ibn taymiah said this ibn qayyim said this shawkani said this, abd wahhab said this, but it’s the first three the most, like did Islamic history of a millennium and a half only produce 15 scholars half of whom came in the 20th century?
ahle sunnah is larger than they make it seem, most scholars of Islamic history did not follow hanbali aqeedah and that’s just a blatant fact, look at the classical books of aqeedah before ibn abd wahhab and look at what aqeedah they followed,
It’s a crime against the deen of Allah to kick out the vast majority of scholars of our history from the fold of ahle sunnah, there have literally been millions of hanafi scholars most of whom were Maturidi, just look at the books of tarajim, Badr al din al ayni, kaasaani, margheenaani, zaylai, ibn nujaym, quduri, shurunbulali, ibn hajr haytami, birgivi, nahlaawi, neemawi, abu bakr al hadaad, tahtawi, maydani, attaassi, ibn humam, shaykh nithaam, ibn hajr asqLani, tabreezi, baghawi, halwaani, karkhi, jasaas, Sarakhsi, shaashi, bazdawi, Abdul azeez Bukhari, Abdul ghani Nabloosi, nasafi, mulaajeewan, alkaaki, mulla ali qari, abd al hay lakhnawi, ibn salaah, subki, sakhaawi, suyuti, zarkashi, Iraqi, zurjaani, jurjaani, abd al haq dehlawi abd azeez dehlawi, Shah Waliullah, nawawi, al mahali, saawi, kardari, thahabi, Ibn maaza, kashmeeri, bayquni, mughaltai, Jamal, abu suud, aaluusi, Qadi thanu allah, ibn alaan, tahawi, sinoosi, ghazali, razi, al mawsili, ibn turkmani, turkistani, qadhi iyad, bayhaqi, muhaasibi, jilaani, ibn adham, ibn ata allah, al mahboobi, ibn haajib, raaghib, baaqilani, zarqaani, murtada zabeedi, khassaf, kardari, al Burhaani, qurtubi, ibn aabideen, al qoowni, ghaznawi, samarqandi, ibn baasha, ibn rustum, baydawi, qutlooboughah, daboosi, juwayni, badr al deen ibn jamat, ibn daqeeq, haskafi, al isbeejaabi, hakim shaheed, babarti, al iz ibn abd Salam, alakhseekathi, tahir Patni, ibn maalik, taftazani, ibn ameer haj, gangohi, Ahmad uthmani, baajoori, kandehlvi, quhustaani, qastalaani, maawardi, zaahidi, walwaaliji, ibn juzi, abu hayyan, khaazin, qadhikhan, maziri, qadhi ibn arabi, sahaalawi, raafii, kirmani, ibn saaati and the list goes on but salafies don’t know any scholars, all they know is like 20 scholars of history and never hear about the other millions cause they just ignorant
If you don’t follow a mathab you are arrogant, ignorant, and are doing tajheel of thousands of scholars
The ummah needs to go back to the four mathabs, we are seeing the results of leaving the mathabs, modernists and free thinkers have taken advantage of this and have taken from the salafi way, Salafism broke the tradition and since then we have more firaq than we’ve had in all history, all modernists virtually started of as salafies , Salafies broke the door of leaving the tradition an the flood of the rest followed, Salafies cut of the attachment of the ummah to the scholars of the past and attached them to contemporary scholars, then westerners and modernists cut the rest off from the salafi scholars who still are decent Muslims in that they observe niqab, the jamat prayer, beards and pants above ankles etc,
Everyone is following someone, it’s either you folllow the four imams or some one else
Salafies have crippled ahle sunnah in they have cut off half the ummah present and the past from the fold and accused all of tabdee
Ashari wrote al ibanah & returned to Hanbali mathhab which Ibn Taymiyyah & Ibn Abdul Wahab followed! we aren't 4 separate dins! They differed in fiqh but are Salafi in Aqidah mostly! People are Sunni but don't know what proof or isnad is, or that it should go back to hadiths to unite.
Oh and Salafi aren't tajseem is that is soppose to mean making a "body". Ashari greek philosophy in action already huh?
Allahu do ti shkatërron të gjithë që e ngatërrojn islamin me qëllim që ta shkatërrojn ISLAMIN ky Albani esht shkatërrues i madh keni kujdes vllezer dhe motra ne islam
Ik more injorant njeri ste vjen turp
Duhet met ardh marre. Allahu te udhzoft.
We follow imams in fiqh as there is so much ikhtilaaf in fiqhi issues in quran and hadeeth which contradict so following one is not wrong
No one said it is wrong, the Shaykh is saying to not blindly follow an Imam when his madhab or opinion goes against a clear more authentic hadith; and the examples of this are many.
so you never have to learn ur religion. sit on your ass all day and just follow the imams because imam equals Islam, right? nice way of thought there
Hi servan, I would like to add a small point, for example, Imaam Malik has direct chain to Omar (R) thru Abdullah ibn Omar (R) and to Abdullah ibn Abbas (R) thru Urwa ibn Zubayr among other chains. Hence when ppl say which madhab did Omar R or Abdullah ibn Abbas follow is a foolish statement, as knowledge flows downwards and not upwards, and in fact following Malaki School would mean following prophet Mohammad (S) through Omar R and Abdulllah ibn Abbas among other Sahabas, or following Hanafi School would mean following prophet Mohammad (S) thought Abdullah ibn Masood (R).
@@kledmohd4230 It's not. Following Imam malik only means following Imam Malik, not Ibn Umar. Why? Because Imam Malik not just recorded what he got, he did ijthihad and tried to form fatwa from them. As we all know, no scholar is free from mistakes in his ijthihad and hence there is no reason to follow a mistaken ijthihad when it is clear that it was a mistake.
" Anti-Madhabism: A Bridge to Irreligion " Muammed Zahid Al-Kawthari
Anti-madhabism never gets muslims united. On the contrary ,it causes billions of mazhabs and chaos.
Because everybody would follow the mazhab "i understand like that". Christians lived the same process and ended up to be secular people and have more sects. Westerners have been supporting anti-mazhabism in islam to make muslims get divided into more pieces and to spread secularism.
It sounds good at first "oh bro dont follow anybody blindly ,just follow quran and hadith". But It s a big trap to deceive muslims.
Indeed,many people who accuse muslims of following 4 imams blindly and say "we dont follow imams blindly ,we follow quran and sunnah only" follow a couple of modern scholars who came up with the colonization of muslims' lands. Following only text is not the methodology of ahli sunnah.
Mazhabs which started with their imams and their disciples, accumulated over time a vast scholarship composed by the successing scholars.
People who read some about the history of modern europe (christianity after Protestantism, modern philosophers ,capitalism) can see the relationship between anti-mazhabism and secularism-individualism-capitalism.
❤
The Sahaba were ijtehadi but they have different opinions also and it's still permitted but the scholars of today can't reach the level of Sahaba, tabi and tabi'un, the best 3 generation ever in history mentioned in ahadith and Imam Abu Hanafi was tabi and i think the rest were tabi'un as they were born later.. SO we should trust their knowledge and opinions and their opinions go back to the sahaba and they have the fatwa if any of our opinion goes against the Quran and sunnah then throw it on the wall...
@Faizal Abubaker he was tabi, he born 80 hijri while all shaba died before the birth of imam Abu hanifa, go and read history.