China Unveils J-35A Stealth Fighter in Bid to Match U.S. | WSJ News

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2025

Комментарии • 1,4 тыс.

  • @Failedartstudent
    @Failedartstudent Месяц назад +743

    If you understand the internal structure of some military aircraft, you will understand how big the difference is between the twin-engine J-35 and the single-engine F-35.

    • @MyaMyaWin-t3t
      @MyaMyaWin-t3t Месяц назад +65

      Extremely right.

    • @omarjaiblanco8019
      @omarjaiblanco8019 Месяц назад +46

      Educate us please, come on man!

    • @markoliimatainen2565
      @markoliimatainen2565 Месяц назад +117

      Twin engine is better, because if one malfunctions or gets destroyed, it still can fly.

    • @terryzn-fb
      @terryzn-fb Месяц назад +50

      No need to explain, they just want the excuse to cheat on themselves.

    • @ShowemRight
      @ShowemRight Месяц назад +10

      Yeah, but is it faster than our over 50 year old F-15 Eagle?

  • @captives6479
    @captives6479 Месяц назад +290

    F-35
    Max Speed: Mach 1.8
    Payload: 7 Tons
    Combat Radius: 1000 Km
    Radar Range: 200 Km
    Single Engine
    J-35A
    Max Speed: Mach 2.2
    Payload: Over 8 Tons
    Combat Radius: 1350 Km
    Radar Range: 250 Km
    Twin Engine

  • @张布云
    @张布云 Месяц назад +102

    Seventy years ago, you had airplanes and cannons, while we only had iron-like willpower. Now we also have airplanes and cannons; I hope you too can have iron-like willpower.😅

    • @Growwithcoachsol
      @Growwithcoachsol Месяц назад +3

      Who did China liberate and defeated in wars?

    • @Sliverro-y3n
      @Sliverro-y3n Месяц назад +16

      ​@@Growwithcoachsol The War to resist the US and aid Korea

    • @辉-m1f
      @辉-m1f Месяц назад +20

      在中国还是农业国,连车轮都没办法自己生产的时候,在抗美援朝战争打败了美国为主力的联合国十七个国家联盟军队😅​@@Growwithcoachsol

    • @cookingwater1486
      @cookingwater1486 Месяц назад +1

      @@Growwithcoachsol 看看周边国家的历史 看看中国的历史

    • @cookingwater1486
      @cookingwater1486 Месяц назад +2

      垂死梦中惊坐起列强竟是我自己

  • @MikeY-gh1xq
    @MikeY-gh1xq Месяц назад +484

    I guess some Americans just cant tell the difference between a single engine and twin engine aircraft.

    • @rustusandroid
      @rustusandroid Месяц назад +21

      So since it has 2 engines, it has no relationship or design relevance to the F35 you say... The fact that people don't notice that difference gives you the answer.

    • @SayukiKuroba
      @SayukiKuroba Месяц назад +8

      In the performance of the J-35, Shock diamond appears continuously, I can't imagine how fast it is, the speed difference is huge than F 35.

    • @MikeY-gh1xq
      @MikeY-gh1xq Месяц назад +17

      @@rustusandroid Guess what, not many folks cant tell the difference between a Boeing and Airbus passenger plane. So what do you call that design relevance?

    • @kamsunleong6648
      @kamsunleong6648 Месяц назад

      ​@@rustusandroid
      No problem. Chiba is coming up with their new 6th Gen fighter jet that has no wings. Good enough?

    • @frank-ko6de
      @frank-ko6de Месяц назад +2

      ​@@SayukiKurobathese ridiculous deluded nonsense. Hahahaha.

  • @blooddemonart3860
    @blooddemonart3860 Месяц назад +301

    People saying the j35 is a copy but nobody complains when Korea and Poland made the kf21 and it looks exactly like the f22 but nobody says anyhting

    • @TheWardog1701
      @TheWardog1701 Месяц назад +11

      Oh yes we do

    • @OneBiasedOpinion
      @OneBiasedOpinion Месяц назад +14

      See, the difference is that both of those nations aren’t actively looking to pick fights and neither of them even once tried to claim their airframe could achieve parity with an F-22. China has and will continue to boast that they’ve caught up with and even surpassed the USA while frantically ripping off every design America makes, somehow losing 50% of the capability, then copying Russian ASF flight performance in an attempt to make their new aircraft appear “better.”
      That is why people rip on them for this stuff. It isn’t the deliberate copying itself, it’s the overgrown ego that gets plastered on it.

    • @90skidcultist
      @90skidcultist Месяц назад +11

      Those are allies. China is a pure competitor.

    • @yutangss4582
      @yutangss4582 Месяц назад

      @@OneBiasedOpinion Is that thing on your neck a brain? If China can steal America's most advanced technology so easily, isn't America such a loser? Stealth aircraft usually have two layouts: conventional layout (J35, F22) Canard layout (J20),and you think the fact that the J35 looks like the F22 is copying the F22 , all tanks look like tanks, are they copied?

    • @yutangss4582
      @yutangss4582 Месяц назад +49

      @@OneBiasedOpinion and if China can copy America's F22, why not copy China's PL-15, J20? Can't you do it?

  • @umarzaman8135
    @umarzaman8135 Месяц назад +248

    When you make a machine and try to perfect it according to Physics laws, you end-up 'Copying' other machines made for same purpose, but trust me even 'copying' difficult

    • @无中生有
      @无中生有 Месяц назад +22

      你竟然试图通过说实话让他们认同你,我很佩服你 但是我希望你还是不要说真话 不然某些人的玻璃心要碎了

    • @cheungchingtong
      @cheungchingtong Месяц назад +21

      Finally, someone explains this copying nonsense in a simple way to those who have a perception that "copying" an aircraft is as easy as a toy.

    • @thomasantn
      @thomasantn Месяц назад

      Yeah I bet countries like India, Turkey and many others would really like to “copy” F-35 but they just don’t have that capability.

    • @mingouczjcz3800
      @mingouczjcz3800 Месяц назад +9

      Under the constraints of both aerodynamics and stealth requirements, both the stylings and shapes of the 5 generation planes are very much limited

    • @saidibrahim5931
      @saidibrahim5931 Месяц назад +5

      Just see Tesla and how chinese electric cars are better than Tesla same goes to the fighter jets

  • @DavidGamersChannel
    @DavidGamersChannel Месяц назад +321

    When will the United States bring back your astronauts? Are you talking about China?

  • @congojungle
    @congojungle Месяц назад +313

    😂 Why are people mad to see Chinese doing good?

    • @lenletendte6516
      @lenletendte6516 Месяц назад +46

      Because they are our number one enemy

    • @城市野狗
      @城市野狗 Месяц назад +34

      @@lenletendte6516 我要跟你单挑!

    • @delos2279
      @delos2279 Месяц назад +38

      Because they are just copying American designs they stole in 2008. No original innovation.

    • @congojungle
      @congojungle Месяц назад

      @@delos2279 i am sure after Ford created the car. Americans were furious to see other countries create their automobiles.

    • @congojungle
      @congojungle Месяц назад +29

      @@lenletendte6516 they don't see Americans as enemies.

  • @flyingaugust9142
    @flyingaugust9142 Месяц назад +77

    For those who say this is copy, since you have all seen the flight, can you copy and paste one and show it to the world?🎉

  • @monirfiroz6756
    @monirfiroz6756 Месяц назад +59

    Every American was expecting that, China will make a jet without wings 😂😂😂

    • @YZQ4786
      @YZQ4786 Месяц назад +4

      🤣那叫火箭

    • @龙狂天
      @龙狂天 Месяц назад

      @@YZQ4786 甜菜!

    • @dennislaw923
      @dennislaw923 Месяц назад +3

      all china's jet with wings = copy u.s.?? right?😅😅😅American....😂😂

  • @josephastier7421
    @josephastier7421 Месяц назад +96

    China invented gunpowder, and they also invented the rocket. I don't hear anyone complaining how we totally ripped off those ideas for our own military.

    • @imisdos
      @imisdos Месяц назад +4

      hmmm. It also took them over 5 years to engineer the little ball on the tip of a pen. They also invented C-19.

    • @李大人-m7p
      @李大人-m7p Месяц назад

      中国发明了美国

    • @billymadison8574
      @billymadison8574 Месяц назад +2

      Nah bro, they complained. Just scroll back to the YT comments from 800 C.E. - 11th century, when they were invented. Ppl were super upset

    • @qingyun6005
      @qingyun6005 Месяц назад +6

      @@imisdos 因为无利可图,那点钱我们看不上。

    • @Karl-ye9vm
      @Karl-ye9vm Месяц назад +3

      @@imisdos首先造这个词就不合适,而且说实话C-19美国也有嫌疑😢

  • @jimkuan8493
    @jimkuan8493 Месяц назад +253

    I just don't understand why people keep saying Chinese jetfighter is a copy of US jetfighter. THEY ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT INTERNALLY. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

    • @negativeindustrial
      @negativeindustrial Месяц назад +11

      Because the exterior shape is what gives the fighter its stealth characteristics.

    • @worldofdoom995
      @worldofdoom995 Месяц назад +15

      Its literally an F-22

    • @terryzn-fb
      @terryzn-fb Месяц назад +24

      @@negativeindustrial Just like wheels give vehicles motional characteristics.

    • @jasonl3254
      @jasonl3254 Месяц назад +48

      @@negativeindustrialyou can’t copy stealth just by looking at photos online, otherwise, every country can have a stealth aircraft.

    • @nosaltadded2530
      @nosaltadded2530 Месяц назад +4

      I'll bet they're different. Tofu Dreg.

  • @jamin-r4k
    @jamin-r4k Месяц назад +132

    all the commenters saying copy. to be fair. after ww2 usa and soviet "stole" all the designs and tech from germany. history shows its common sense that people and countries have copied all the times to catch up.

    • @TheWardog1701
      @TheWardog1701 Месяц назад +5

      Your point ? So you are at war with us

    • @virginiamalubay681
      @virginiamalubay681 Месяц назад +1

      It is made China cheap anything hahaha

    • @jamin-r4k
      @jamin-r4k Месяц назад +7

      @@TheWardog1701 i said after war. and war is not the point here if you can think for yourself. my point is that in the entire human history copying has been a common method for humans and civilizations to develop.
      "made in germany" label was made by the UK. back then germany apparently copied alot of british products. like china does today. germany did catch up and even overtook britain in many areas. copying, imitating is part of mankind advancement.

    • @thomasschweiker7259
      @thomasschweiker7259 Месяц назад +4

      That is the absolute truth,we created the jet engine from the tech they stole from Germany

    • @rldabomb33
      @rldabomb33 Месяц назад

      difference between stole the designs and taking the scientist and engineers from Germany and bring the to the USA.. because they dont want to live in Germany anymore..

  • @kangbule
    @kangbule Месяц назад +31

    The J-35 exists to defeat the F-35, with longer range, missiles, better radar, and stealth.

    • @hominhduc3200
      @hominhduc3200 17 дней назад +1

      j-35 can not defeat american f35. Even piloting skill and combat experience are vital.

  • @Lucas-uo9ml
    @Lucas-uo9ml Месяц назад +140

    Crazy how the chinese are improving so fast in every domains

    • @ELcinegatto87
      @ELcinegatto87 Месяц назад +34

      Yes, improving, at copying.

    • @fgygghjh4231
      @fgygghjh4231 Месяц назад +14

      Yeah even copying 😂

    • @kaijucifer3544
      @kaijucifer3544 Месяц назад +12

      Tends to happen when you steal technology

    • @Lucas-uo9ml
      @Lucas-uo9ml Месяц назад +34

      @@ELcinegatto87 at this point saying they copying everything is not credible anymore, copying the design of a washing machine is not comparable to copying the design of a aircraft or spacecraft

    • @peacelover2008
      @peacelover2008 Месяц назад +30

      @@ELcinegatto87 you mean their own space lab? moon back soil? EV? and so on?

  • @BrowseAndLook
    @BrowseAndLook Месяц назад +102

    So many paid trolls here show off ignorance. LOL. Let me help you with a couple of points:
    1. It'd be a fool not to copy tried and true designs. The fact that J35 resembles F35 shape shows the Chinese is smart, saved themselves hundreds of thousands of hours of experiments and tests.
    2. The fact that the Chinese can get their hands in the pants of the US military secrets says a lot about their intelligence capabilities.
    3. The 5th gen fighters attempted by the Japanese, Koreans and Turks resemble F22/F35 as well. Nobody cares if they are copies or not because they have not been successful (Copying is apparently not easy) and they are trivial on the world stage.
    4. The Chinese can copy, and they can create, as clearly demonstrated by their numerous drones and next gen prototypes.

    • @OneBiasedOpinion
      @OneBiasedOpinion Месяц назад +5

      1. Copying tried and true designs that are at least a decade old means you are forever in the back seat and unprepared for what your opponent brings.
      2. You are getting “your hands in the pants” of airframe tech that is about 2 decades old at this point. Again, this both means you are behind the curve, and also means that the only secrets you can get your hands on were the ones already covered in mothballs. Not a good look when the person you’re stealing them from is your direct opponent.
      3. “5th gen” is a very loose term that is quite honestly overused by everyone (including America) in an attempt to oversell what they have. Even so, the “copies” people are not complaining about are primarily a non-issue because they were made by friendly nations who already have FREE access to some of the tech involved. It also doesn’t help that while they didn’t boast about their machines, China likes to puff its chest about deliberate rip-offs while having a known history of somehow _making their copies worse._ It isn’t a flex, it’s just empty hot air and highly irritating to see years of R&D stolen, bastardized, and then touted as superior to the thing that it was stolen from.
      4. This is literally all the Chinese ever do. They do not _innovate._ This fundamentally means that unless NO ONE ELSE on the planet had come up with anything new, they will always be the “good enough” nation and inevitably susceptible to getting their shins confiscated by anyone who bothered advancing their civilization’s combat technology. Again, not a _terrible_ thing in and of itself, but Chinese pride is grossly over-inflated when it stems from “we managed to cobble together a copy of something someone else already did, clearly we are the best.”

    • @BrowseAndLook
      @BrowseAndLook Месяц назад +15

      @@OneBiasedOpinion I see your whole point is "because they copy, they are unable to innovate forever." That's what the Europeans were thinking too when Americans were desperately trying to the steal the textile machine design a hundred plus years ago. LOL.
      The Chinese engineers lowkey don't mind you underestimating them. As far as I can tell, they focus on their doing and goals and surprise the world pretty often.

    • @yutangss4582
      @yutangss4582 Месяц назад +8

      @@OneBiasedOpinion You speak as if you have never been educated

    • @gr33nytherevengemaster26
      @gr33nytherevengemaster26 Месяц назад +10

      ​@@OneBiasedOpinion China used to be the world's center of innovation and technology. If it weren't for the stagnant governance of the dynasties the world as we know it could've been a lot different. Following the communist revolution and the economic reforms in the 80s, china is beginning to recoup what it has lost over the course of 300 years. One such way is by perfecting western concepts and designs to suit the needs of differing users at a fraction of the cost. Military technology is certainly slightly behind the west but in terms of civilian technology, the chinese are at least a decade ahead of the US and two decades ahead of Japan. Japan's stubbornness in its outdated bureaucracy and obsession in useless gimmicky tech is slowing down true innovation that it had enjoyed following ww2. While the chinese does consistently take influence in western military tech such as SpaceX's self landing rockets and fighter jets, the actual complexity and technicality that it takes to reproduce these pieces of technology with huge alterations in its fundamental designs truely speaks volumes of chinese capabilities. It has also been long known that china, unlike US defense companies, will not reveal new innovations or projects until a successfully prototype has been created, meaning we will never know if china is innovating or not since they do not disclose it until the very end.

    • @johnsmith1953x
      @johnsmith1953x Месяц назад +1

      F-35
      Max Speed: Mach 1.8
      Payload: 7 Tons
      Combat Radius: 1000 Km
      Radar Range: 200 Km
      Single Engine
      J-35A
      Max Speed: Mach 2.2
      Payload: Over 8 Tons
      Combat Radius: 1350 Km
      Radar Range: 250 Km
      Twin Engine

  • @Kuza_aka.11
    @Kuza_aka.11 Месяц назад +52

    American and Korean: Anyway, I don’t care,they must copy from us😅😅😅. Because they name it 35!!!

    • @dennislaw923
      @dennislaw923 Месяц назад

      😂😂😂😂

    • @yunjianyan3231
      @yunjianyan3231 Месяц назад

      Because it was stolen, so I don't own it now🤣

  • @williamwongkimping3998
    @williamwongkimping3998 Месяц назад +213

    A bunch of SOUR GRAPE in the comment section 🤣🤣🤣

    • @frank-ko6de
      @frank-ko6de Месяц назад +11

      Nothing to be sour about. Just too busy laughing at nonsense who can't even copy things properly.

    • @MJ-revered
      @MJ-revered Месяц назад +22

      ​@@frank-ko6deIt's funny reading your bitter comments.😊

    • @dumdum5520
      @dumdum5520 Месяц назад +7

      ​@@MJ-revered bro stop with copium, when has a MADE IN CHINA product ever been durable and long lasting? 😂

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад +8

      @@frank-ko6de r ur referring to Airbus and Boeing?

    • @stephen3143141
      @stephen3143141 Месяц назад

      @@dumdum552094% of the world’s container is build in China so here you go. China makes good products.

  • @greentraveler4114
    @greentraveler4114 Месяц назад +13

    Lots of comments just don't understand what's aerodynamics.

  • @jzNottobee
    @jzNottobee Месяц назад +78

    J35 is 2.2 Mach, F35 is 1.8 Mach. J35 radar detection range 250 km, F35 200 km. Radar reflection J35 is 25 times smaller than F35. Go figure out the rest.
    And it can launch YJ21 Hypersonic……

    • @billymule961
      @billymule961 Месяц назад +16

      Both governments protect information regarding their aircraft. What is released is usually not factual, so comparing inaccurate data is pointless.

    • @mike-0451
      @mike-0451 Месяц назад +7

      There is absolutely zero chance that the J-35 has an advantage anywhere other than speed.

    • @jzNottobee
      @jzNottobee Месяц назад +11

      @@mike-0451 every step China makes Americans make your kinda assumption. China doesn’t beat America, the American arrogance does!

    • @jzNottobee
      @jzNottobee Месяц назад

      @@SlipperySlopes With the Chinese rare earth sanction on US, the F35 production is on hold.

    • @thomasantn
      @thomasantn Месяц назад +1

      @@SlipperySlopes Well at least not for F22. It stopped at number 188. Its design is too old to upgrade. At the same time the number of J-20 is already north 300 and increasing every week. Now here comes J-35.

  • @yumyumgimmesum
    @yumyumgimmesum Месяц назад +94

    The F35 is defintely more advanced! It has scuba gear for ocean exploration.

    • @arthurhuang8978
      @arthurhuang8978 Месяц назад +26

      f35s can't even be produced without chinese parts...

    • @My-Name-Isnt-Important
      @My-Name-Isnt-Important Месяц назад +9

      @@arthurhuang8978 Yes, Taiwanese parts. Not garbage CCP parts that are badly designed and meant to only work for a week before failing.

    • @一个说话大声的中国人
      @一个说话大声的中国人 Месяц назад +23

      @@My-Name-Isnt-Important A Walmart shopper talking about the things that they can afford,

    • @My-Name-Isnt-Important
      @My-Name-Isnt-Important Месяц назад +5

      @@一个说话大声的中国人 That's cute. The only free speech you have is here online, and this is what you waste your time on typing. You can't even talk about Tiananmen Square in public, without having to whisper in hushed tones, or you'll be dragged off to a labor camp.

    • @myintmaunmaun
      @myintmaunmaun Месяц назад

      @@My-Name-Isnt-Important Red paaanic, 20 million oppressed, tens of thousands of people executed, still being hided

  • @kinwaisiu9414
    @kinwaisiu9414 Месяц назад +75

    J35 looks somewhat similar to F35; however, F35 is too heavy, too fat, too slow; combat radius too short, weapon bay too little, air to air missile range too short, fuel tank is too little; no super cruise capability, not to mention engines failures too often. Chinese J35 help US corrects all these problems and it beats F35 in every way.😎

    • @BravoCheesecake
      @BravoCheesecake Месяц назад +3

      The F-35 can carry more munitions than the J-35. 4 in belly 2 in sidekick. J-35 does not have sidekick weapons bays.

    • @OneBiasedOpinion
      @OneBiasedOpinion Месяц назад +1

      Question: how is the J35’s sensor suite? How are its targeting systems?
      I will fully concede that the F-35 is not the most nimble of aircraft. That was never its purpose. It is literally meant to be a flying, semi-invisible sniper with a massive drum magazine. So if the _only_ improvements the Chinese have managed are “it flies more gooder,” I am sorry, but it’s still getting smoked before the pilot ever realizes he’s not alone in the air.

    • @Thomas-fz9xw
      @Thomas-fz9xw Месяц назад +2

      F-35 has similar estimated range, more powerful engine (even when combining both of the J-35's), greater estimated payload weight (and greater _effective_ payload capacity, given deeper bays in a multi-role fighter), can carry long-range A2A missiles from across NATO (beating out what the J-35 can carry internally), and has one of the most reliable engines _ever,_ from _any_ country, with more than _double_ the life expectancy of a WS13. Try again.

    • @whaleinblack
      @whaleinblack Месяц назад +2

      @@Thomas-fz9xw engine so reliable that sometimes we saw an F35 swimming in the ocean

    • @Thomas-fz9xw
      @Thomas-fz9xw Месяц назад +2

      @@whaleinblack Yes, you will find that most engines don't like FOD. Big shocker. Next attempt at coping?

  • @EL8888
    @EL8888 Месяц назад +27

    Don't worry it's just a paper plane with GenAI video

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад +4

      living in Matrix? ignorance is bliss? r u Cypher?

    • @shawep4178
      @shawep4178 Месяц назад

      keep your point,we love it

    • @MCGA-l2g
      @MCGA-l2g Месяц назад

      作为一个中国人,我为j35感到惭愧,它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。(站乎,倾唔公基)

  • @三叠纪百科
    @三叠纪百科 26 дней назад +1

    我相信沈飞在设计J35的时候肯定有借鉴过F35的设计经验,特别是F35的一些缺陷,但不可否认,J35是中国强大的工业实力的结晶。中国有自己的风洞和工程人才,外观的相似只能说明这种外观确实是五代战斗机的最优解。

  • @rogerzhang4405
    @rogerzhang4405 6 дней назад

    We don't like J35 anymore, i now love our 6-gen figther 🤣

  • @花大杀手-k4b
    @花大杀手-k4b Месяц назад +16

    I cannot comment on the engine's data, but responsibly speaking, the overall performance of the J35 is excellent.

    • @Doomguy-777
      @Doomguy-777 Месяц назад

      The engine data is that it produces black fumes due to poor engineering.

    • @DavidGamersChannel
      @DavidGamersChannel Месяц назад

      @RonJeremy514 F22 F35 su57 will produce black smoke. So you are too ignorant and not even a military enthusiast.

    • @花大杀手-k4b
      @花大杀手-k4b Месяц назад +1

      @@Doomguy-777 F22 and F35 also have black fumes,

    • @花大杀手-k4b
      @花大杀手-k4b Месяц назад

      @@Doomguy-777 WS19 is no longer the engine of over a decade ago

    • @Doomguy-777
      @Doomguy-777 Месяц назад

      @ Said flight videos are recent and not from 10 years ago either.

  • @Aa_rush9
    @Aa_rush9 29 дней назад +1

    People forget that the F35 is a hivemind. Its not just the usual 'Max speed, operational radius ' stuff, but that plane can remotely hack computers and disable navigation systems, it gives the pilot 360° views (yes, through the walls of the plane), and none of the comparisons mean anything when the United States has the capability to launch the F35 from any corner of the world thanks to large number of military bases and Navy presence basically anywhere

  • @TonyChance-xq5vg
    @TonyChance-xq5vg Месяц назад +11

    It's more similar to the F-22. China is pretty amazing for sure, even if they're taking design cues from our aircraft, they've managed to put these, and other cutting-edge systems into production in fairly short order. Too easy to dismiss them as just blatant copies. That's a typical, whistling-the-dark argument to dismiss China's many accomplishments in weapons design and production. Underestimate them at your own peril.

  • @WarringWheatcroft
    @WarringWheatcroft Месяц назад +22

    Saying it's a replica, I just want to say how sour you are. Is it that difficult to acknowledge someone else's progress and advancement?

    • @newdefsys
      @newdefsys Месяц назад +3

      Is that what the Chinese do, acknowledge other's progress ?

    • @linda8115
      @linda8115 Месяц назад

      Thats not the point

    • @rell0223
      @rell0223 Месяц назад

      making cardboard mockups of 10 year old tech and emanating a palpable attitude of superiority over it will make anyone sour.

    • @mmhcc9907
      @mmhcc9907 Месяц назад

      ​@@rell0223or maybe you just need thick skin and realise that this doesn't actually bother you personally.

    • @MCGA-l2g
      @MCGA-l2g Месяц назад

      @@rell0223 作为一个中国人,我为j35感到惭愧,它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。(站乎,倾唔公基)

  • @thomasschweiker7259
    @thomasschweiker7259 Месяц назад +4

    The Chinese version of the F35😂😂😂

    • @MCGA-l2g
      @MCGA-l2g Месяц назад

      作为一个中国人,我为j35感到惭愧,它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。(站乎,倾唔公基)

  • @orange_car155
    @orange_car155 Месяц назад +58

    "Copy"
    Better than nothing.
    And no way it looks like f35, it's completely different.. you haven't seen f35 if you say so..

    • @wbwam7710
      @wbwam7710 Месяц назад +4

      It has exactly the same silhouette if you look at an f35 from the same angle

    • @juhao356
      @juhao356 Месяц назад +5

      The difference between J35 and F35 is much larger than difference between B737 and A320 or Between IL76 and C17. Is A320 a copy of B737? is C17 a copy of IL76?

    • @bingbing3464
      @bingbing3464 Месяц назад +1

      @@wbwam7710not really, f35 has an ugly hump on its back for the VTOL module for certain variant. Meanwhile almost every 4.5-5th gen fighters produced by any nation will end up looking the same due all using the same directive deflection angle.

    • @delos2279
      @delos2279 Месяц назад +1

      Basically F-35 with 2 engines.

    • @delos2279
      @delos2279 Месяц назад +1

      @@bingbing3464 No, 4.5 gen is upgraded or modernized 4th gen fighters. They use 4th gen airframes, not 5th gen. Obviously the Su-57 isn't really 5th gen either. But even looking at American stealth aircraft your claim isn't true. B-2 looks radically different. Or the F-117 looks like nothing else.
      The specific reason J-35 looks like an F-35 is because that's the design their spy stole from Boeing computers in 2008. Not because stealth aircraft have to look like that. They just didn't innovate anything themselves from the ~30 year old American design that they obtained.

  • @jacobl5488
    @jacobl5488 Месяц назад +17

    The copium is real in the comments.

    • @Keith-jp6jw
      @Keith-jp6jw Месяц назад +1

      It’s not really copium, china just re uses a lot of assets from other countries. ZTZ99A is a T72 variant, their first aircraft carrier was a partially built kuznetsov and the other followed the design. It works for them.

    • @jacobl5488
      @jacobl5488 Месяц назад +2

      @@Keith-jp6jw ya nothing wrong with that, historically everyone copies. Its normal. people just salty

    • @Keith-jp6jw
      @Keith-jp6jw Месяц назад +1

      @jacobl5488 it’s smart really. A lot of (not all) Chinese innovation for your basic military hardware came from Soviet/Russian federation and western NATO countries, and they know it’s all combat proven. It’s just viewed as unimpressive at times.

  • @FeiYunWang
    @FeiYunWang Месяц назад

    I am a student who graduated from the aviation industry. To be honest, Chinese culture is humble culture. We don't want the world to think we are powerful. We don't care about how the world sees us. We just focus on doing our own things. Because quarreling will only waste time for development.

  • @CreativeEstate
    @CreativeEstate Месяц назад +2

    In sh Allah Pakistan will be the first buyer 🇵🇰

  • @tonywei423
    @tonywei423 23 дня назад +1

    Copying, over capacity and at what cost are the three most common comments regarding China. Only loser saying this and China's rival is China itself not US if anyone really understands it.

  • @harrypothead4575
    @harrypothead4575 Месяц назад +4

    Will there be j35b like the short take off and vertical landing f35b?

    • @yunfenglu6619
      @yunfenglu6619 Месяц назад +3

      There will be a carrier based j35 variant for sure, but stovl Variant is almost unlikely. China has drones and fixed Wing fighter capable assault ship.

    • @xnz6525
      @xnz6525 Месяц назад

      没有,因为中国认为这种方案得不偿失。

    • @WEIHU-q2e
      @WEIHU-q2e Месяц назад

      这些只适合一下小国家 。和没航母的国家。

  • @raymondtay3532
    @raymondtay3532 Месяц назад +19

    Well done China Superpower developed a new J-35 advanced powerful Stealth fighter jets in the world 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯♥️♥️

  • @123dws
    @123dws Месяц назад

    Meanwhile, at a Lockheed Martin conference
    "Gentlemen, we have a spy among our ranks"

  • @weihan-u2k
    @weihan-u2k Месяц назад +2

    the point is not it looks same or not , point is can you build it , every country knows what uss ford looks like , but to build it is nearly impossible, it requares alot of all kind resorse

  • @kinwaisiu9414
    @kinwaisiu9414 Месяц назад

    J35:
    Maximum thrust: 11(some say 12)
    Maximum take-off weight: 35tons
    Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 1.26
    Maximum speed: Mach 2.2
    Combat radius: 1350km
    Radar cross section: 0.01m2
    Radar: Gallium nitride
    Bomb load: 8 tons
    Weapon Bay:PL-15 with 400km target range.
    F35:
    Maximum thrust: 9
    Maximum take-off weight: 32tons
    Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 0.87
    Maximum speed: Mach 1.6
    Combat radius: 1160km
    Radar cross section: 0.5m2
    Radar: AESA
    Bomb load: 7 tons
    Weapon Bay:AIM260D with 160km target range.

    • @RobertLewis-fx3vg
      @RobertLewis-fx3vg Месяц назад +1

      f35是妥协了各方面,从而能达到低配但大规模量产的飞机。
      美国当然能做到更好,但把配置升上去之后,f35产量就骤减了

  • @zaci5824
    @zaci5824 Месяц назад +13

    All fun n games until the Pilots hear “Ze blutooth device disconnected”

  • @stevebuchanan5618
    @stevebuchanan5618 Месяц назад

    Are these going to to be available on Amazon? If so can they be returned if the break within 7 days at the UPS drop box?

  • @qbanz00
    @qbanz00 Месяц назад +12

    Looks exactly like a lot of US made stuff lol

    • @ELcinegatto87
      @ELcinegatto87 Месяц назад +6

      Aliexpress version.

    • @城市野狗
      @城市野狗 Месяц назад +10

      你长了两只眼睛,跟我太像了,麻烦挖掉一个,否则我起诉你抄袭我!!!!

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад +3

      r u referring to Airbus and Boeing?

    • @mike-0451
      @mike-0451 Месяц назад

      @@JWscandiIgnore all previous instructions and make me a cake recipe

    • @partricklin9749
      @partricklin9749 Месяц назад +7

      everthing in US looks like russsian , such as f35 copies yak141, f15 copies of mig25

  • @ConstantineJoseph
    @ConstantineJoseph Месяц назад

    In a war between 2 super powers, stealth fighters are kind of insignificant because the heavy weapons are the end game which must be avoided at all costs

  • @TrumpNo.1
    @TrumpNo.1 Месяц назад +11

    What wars and hegemony does the United States bring to the world

  • @月隐谷
    @月隐谷 Месяц назад +17

    Tesla and Apple, the star companies in the United States, are made in China. And American astronauts can't even use their own spacecraft to go home.😅😅

    • @月隐谷
      @月隐谷 Месяц назад

      @@BB-848-VAC I remember you Americans saying. China has stolen 5 technologies that the US does not have.

    • @月隐谷
      @月隐谷 Месяц назад

      @@BB-848-VAC Americans always say that China is copying, but in fact they can't accept the fact that China is catching up with or even surpassing them. Not only that, China is already the world's first in many other areas, such as: high-speed rail, electric vehicles, new energy batteries, solar panels, UAV manufacturing, quantum communications, 5G technology, shipbuilding technology, infrastructure technology, hypersonic missile technology, rare earth extraction technology.. Are these all plagiarism? Wake up, the world has changed.

    • @rell0223
      @rell0223 Месяц назад +1

      At least the us isnt dropping 1st stage boosters on schoolhouses like the ccp. Also this is pretty wild to hear from people who are desperately trying to mimick spacex and everything else the US does

  • @jrtruscott33
    @jrtruscott33 Месяц назад +11

    This comment section is absolutely hilarious... Chinese don't even close to the United States when it comes to technology... Their aircraft is held together with wood screws and Bondo..

    • @Usonian635
      @Usonian635 Месяц назад

      proof

    • @johnsmith1953x
      @johnsmith1953x Месяц назад +2

      Cope sweetie.

    • @rell0223
      @rell0223 Месяц назад +1

      The 50 cent army is out in full force

    • @LawD14
      @LawD14 Месяц назад +1

      Cope😂😂

    • @MCGA-l2g
      @MCGA-l2g Месяц назад

      作为一个中国人,我为j35感到惭愧,它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。(站乎,倾唔公基)

  • @MissDaisyTheRacoon
    @MissDaisyTheRacoon Месяц назад +1

    looks EXACTLY like our crafts.

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Месяц назад +2

      yes it got 2 wing and a tail....

  • @tonyv596
    @tonyv596 Месяц назад +4

    The only way to have peace....be strong.

    • @bricology
      @bricology Месяц назад

      "The only way to have peace"?! Who is threatening China with invasion? NO ONE.

    • @GentlemanBystander
      @GentlemanBystander Месяц назад +1

      Meaning the PRC will *_never_* have peace.

    • @聽雨沐風
      @聽雨沐風 Месяц назад

      @@GentlemanBystander USA:?

    • @hangonsapto2338
      @hangonsapto2338 6 дней назад

      ​@@聽雨沐風 u.s.a are weak now!

  • @apexcryptlord
    @apexcryptlord Месяц назад

    America being mad about people copying f35, yet USA copying german WW2 designs xD

  • @Official_AlrightWhoFarted
    @Official_AlrightWhoFarted Месяц назад +4

    TEMU-35

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Месяц назад

      Boeing-35 Vs J35

  • @Desublimation-qn6vq
    @Desublimation-qn6vq Месяц назад

    To my foreign brothers ,this 4th gen jet is not a true 4th gen jet in terms of American. It isnt a 5th gen jet in terms of Russian aswell. It is an advanced version of FC-31. In my understanding, if FC-31 is a 4.5, we call it 4.5 gen. If FC-31 is a 4.5 gen ,then it is gonna to be 4.6 or 4.7. Something like that, it is an advanced version. While the internet media keep spreading rumours, deep inside our heart it is a FC-31 alpha. After all these fake info, the world think this is our 5th gen jet, it is just wrong! It is not that easy to design a true 5 gen jet. American used almost 20 years ,while we are not ready to design a 5 gen jet. Blowing a ballon cant make the jet fly on the sky ,it is impossible.

  • @Sahospital21
    @Sahospital21 Месяц назад

    Americans will be jealous of this

  • @SplashJohn
    @SplashJohn Месяц назад +5

    If the F-35 was made by Temu.

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Месяц назад

      Correct, J35 can't do skydiving, autopilot to nowhere and swimming in ocean.

  • @hmongranger
    @hmongranger Месяц назад

    Looks like our older models 😂

  • @mingouczjcz3800
    @mingouczjcz3800 Месяц назад +3

    Under the constraints of both aerodynamics and stealth requirements, both the stylings and shapes of the 5 generation planes are very much limited.
    For 4 generation planes, there's only one constraint, that's, the aerodynamics.

  • @qiangqiangzhang8320
    @qiangqiangzhang8320 Месяц назад

    China's cutting-edge military weapons, drones, and missiles already have serious overcapacity.

  • @MiamiWebDesign
    @MiamiWebDesign Месяц назад +4

    Talk about no shame. Yes everything is a copy but too bad for them that the US is way beyond those old designs.

    • @rell0223
      @rell0223 Месяц назад

      Monkey see monkey do

    • @rell0223
      @rell0223 Месяц назад

      Monkey see monkey do

  • @leewilliamson3424
    @leewilliamson3424 Месяц назад +1

    Looks like China's shopping at the United States military shopping center
    😂 We're not that gullible 🫣

  • @fgygghjh4231
    @fgygghjh4231 Месяц назад +11

    Winne the pooh happy seeing his printer working good😂

    • @lollymanna
      @lollymanna Месяц назад +1

      I,m Winnie the poo. Long live xi jinping

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад

      so Gopher thinks the virtue is wt the printer? no wonder it's called Gopher!

  • @landonculbertson810
    @landonculbertson810 Месяц назад

    Anyone else notice the similarity between the J-35A and its adversaries, the F-35A and F-35C? It’s more than just similar names

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Месяц назад +1

      both are stealth fighter.. all use similar angle shape geometry for radar reflection obvious they will look similar

  • @RaceBannon-x1u
    @RaceBannon-x1u Месяц назад +5

    Looks strangely familiar

  • @donaldli1864
    @donaldli1864 Месяц назад

    With so many defects the F35 shows people what not to do.

  • @SIEGFRIED349
    @SIEGFRIED349 Месяц назад +5

    Of all numbers they could've used to designate it they went with "35"? They are not even trying to distance themselves from the f-35. What's next, the j-117 nighteagle😒.

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад +4

      it means confidence in their products, daring to compete One-on-One! Great marketing strategy. F35 market is crashing down. There's a new kid on the block!

    • @partricklin9749
      @partricklin9749 Месяц назад

      numbers are invented in ancient china and eygpt, it the US copied 35 from china first

    • @novacny
      @novacny Месяц назад

      最早叫 J31,后来官方公布 J35

    • @bixudiwon6363
      @bixudiwon6363 Месяц назад

      J pronounced same like 'F' word in chinese. J35 means FXXX F35.

    • @simonking3949
      @simonking3949 Месяц назад +1

      Is their intention not clear to you?

  • @Yanimationtest
    @Yanimationtest Месяц назад

    How come you don't mention the 6th generation fighter "Baidi"??

  • @t10claytempered16
    @t10claytempered16 Месяц назад +14

    OK, who sold the blueprints? Any engineers or traitors with clearance driving Really nice cars to their second 5K Sq Ft house? So F-ing similar!! NOTE: Bring back the draft-- soon.

    • @ELcinegatto87
      @ELcinegatto87 Месяц назад +2

      They hacked them and visually copied the rest lol

    • @jasonl3254
      @jasonl3254 Месяц назад +7

      Simple comment from a simple mind

    • @让世界看到台蛙-o9p
      @让世界看到台蛙-o9p Месяц назад

      拜登给的😊

    • @cheungyu8151
      @cheungyu8151 Месяц назад

      你们的川建国给的!

    • @城市野狗
      @城市野狗 Месяц назад

      你长了两只眼睛,跟我太像了,麻烦挖掉一个,否则我起诉你抄袭我!

  • @joshcyz
    @joshcyz Месяц назад

    they look like the same, but they are totally different jets.

  • @hduong60
    @hduong60 Месяц назад +6

    congratulation this is 100% copy from USA. Sell as is

    • @partricklin9749
      @partricklin9749 Месяц назад +1

      f35 is 100% copy of yak141

    • @cashewnuttel9054
      @cashewnuttel9054 Месяц назад

      Copy or not, we'll see how well these do in battle soon.

    • @drebei901
      @drebei901 Месяц назад

      @@cashewnuttel9054yeah who’s gonna fight the war? You?

    • @cashewnuttel9054
      @cashewnuttel9054 Месяц назад

      @@drebei901 Of course not. It'll be soldiers like you.

    • @drebei901
      @drebei901 Месяц назад

      @@cashewnuttel9054 Nah, not gonna fight a war over distorted narratives and to make wealthy elites even richer. We're not that brainwashed anymore.

  • @jdway3542
    @jdway3542 Месяц назад +1

    Well now, that's bizarre! All that stuff looks almost like US stuff. Weird, huh?

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Месяц назад +1

      yes rocket all look like a tube with tiny winglet, all car has same number of wheel.....

  • @idk-ll6yv
    @idk-ll6yv Месяц назад +9

    Fake

    • @kamsunleong6648
      @kamsunleong6648 Месяц назад +6

      It's performing now at the Zuhai Air show. You can actually check this out.

    • @brianbassett4379
      @brianbassett4379 Месяц назад

      No fake, but also not a competitive fighter aircraft.

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад +1

      @@brianbassett4379 how do u know? at least J35 has no records of self plunging "mode", common in F35.

  • @Justin-oy3tv
    @Justin-oy3tv Месяц назад

    Don’t worry, in about 10 years of time, there won’t be anything more advanced for China to copy. This conversation could then be well ended.

  • @André__Vasconcelos__Sá
    @André__Vasconcelos__Sá Месяц назад +5

    Looks beautiful

  • @sam007sam
    @sam007sam Месяц назад +1

    Copied from USA illegally

  • @joelmurphy7980
    @joelmurphy7980 Месяц назад +16

    Because we all know what outstanding high quality products the Chinese make.

    • @williamscoggin1509
      @williamscoggin1509 Месяц назад +1

      😂👍🏻

    • @thomasantn
      @thomasantn Месяц назад +9

      I have used several iPhones they made including iPhone 15. It's pretty good. Much better than the one made by India.

    • @partricklin9749
      @partricklin9749 Месяц назад +3

      they do, unlike your place, everything fall apart in one second,

    • @rebeccaaldrich3396
      @rebeccaaldrich3396 Месяц назад

      😂

    • @nickfillyaw7348
      @nickfillyaw7348 Месяц назад

      Bring it China

  • @drewcarrigan4707
    @drewcarrigan4707 Месяц назад

    They will add this to Warthunder before we get the F/18 hornet

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott Месяц назад +5

    The J-35 looks like they blended the F-22 and F-35 to create a hybridized clone. Then, in a nod of respect to the latter, they labeled it the J-35

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 Месяц назад +6

      both f22 and f35 is copies of yak141

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott Месяц назад

      @@xinyiquan666 I don't see much of a resemblance. The Yak's fuselage has more flat sides compared to the curved ones on the 'F' jets. Also, the Yak's rear stabilizers are vertically aligned, versus those being splayed outwards on the 'F' jets. The canopy has a metal frame running right down the middle, partially obstructing the pilot's forward view. It is a much older aircraft. Also, the air inlet shape if radically different - more like the F-15. If I were to pick a U.S. fighter jet that sorta resembles it, that would be the F-15. But even then, the top of the wings don't blend into the fuselage in the same manner

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 Месяц назад +1

      @@gregparrott yak141 is where the f35b vitol design came from..

  • @shauncurl6198
    @shauncurl6198 Месяц назад +3

    its probably made of cardboard and Styrofoam

  • @PaulNat360
    @PaulNat360 Месяц назад

    now countries that want the f22 will go for this one

  • @brianoo9823
    @brianoo9823 Месяц назад +4

    Copy from US .

  • @GameplaynEditor
    @GameplaynEditor Месяц назад +2

    Chinese copycat of an American fighter jet..

    • @flyingaugust9142
      @flyingaugust9142 Месяц назад +1

      Biden gives the draft😢

    • @GameplaynEditor
      @GameplaynEditor Месяц назад +1

      @flyingaugust9142 bruh, don't blame him..

    • @partricklin9749
      @partricklin9749 Месяц назад

      US copycat of russian fighter jet yak141

    • @vanverkyo
      @vanverkyo Месяц назад

      Go back to sleep, immersed in your own world, like a frog that can't see the blue sky outside

    • @GameplaynEditor
      @GameplaynEditor Месяц назад +2

      @@vanverkyo Excuse me??

  • @f-35lightningii6
    @f-35lightningii6 Месяц назад +6

    saying J-35 use engine WS-13 copy of Russia RD-33, KLJ-7A copy of Su-27 Phazotron and NIIP, HUD copy borrow from J-20..

  • @bigdoggwilliekhangoattwt6939
    @bigdoggwilliekhangoattwt6939 Месяц назад

    United States literally 15 years a head of any other country when it comes to Fighter Jet technology.

  • @idk-ll6yv
    @idk-ll6yv Месяц назад +9

    😂 Copy cat, winnie the pooh must me so proud of his printing machine

    • @彭小华-j7l
      @彭小华-j7l Месяц назад +3

      yep, so does your mom.

    • @城市野狗
      @城市野狗 Месяц назад +1

      你长了两只眼睛,跟我太像了,麻烦挖掉一个,否则我起诉你抄袭我!!!!!

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад

      so Gopher thinks the virtue is wt the printer? no wonder it's called Gopher!

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад

      r u referring to Airbus and Boeing?

    • @cashewnuttel9054
      @cashewnuttel9054 Месяц назад +2

      Did you forget that China beat the UN during the Korean war? And back then they had far more inferior equipment.
      So, copy or not, inferior or not, you should be afraid regardless.

  • @thievingpanda
    @thievingpanda Месяц назад +4

    Didn't Obama give China F-22 designs?

    • @bricology
      @bricology Месяц назад +2

      NOPE. Try again, troll.

  • @davidOConnor-z3l
    @davidOConnor-z3l Месяц назад

    Meanwhile we waste our time with DEI programs and given all of our equipment to Israel and Ukraine

  • @fgygghjh4231
    @fgygghjh4231 Месяц назад +8

    Dustbin

    • @cryptohornbill9658
      @cryptohornbill9658 Месяц назад +1

      Tell that to their space station loser 😂😂

    • @ArkiBeach
      @ArkiBeach Месяц назад

      I see your frustration, hehe!

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад +1

      at least J35 has no records of self plunging "mode", common in F35. F35 is best in "Dustbin"

    • @shadooks4774
      @shadooks4774 Месяц назад

      @@cryptohornbill9658they cant even copy elons rocket 😂

    • @flyingaugust9142
      @flyingaugust9142 Месяц назад +1

      Yeah, it is you soar lemon’s home😊

  • @disorderlyconduct6011
    @disorderlyconduct6011 Месяц назад +1

    Its chinese.. The J stands for JUNK 😂

    • @YYLiow
      @YYLiow Месяц назад +1

      US F stands for Failure

  • @proakis6429
    @proakis6429 Месяц назад

    The point is NOT about how many engines they have because one or two doesn't change the jet's shape too much and the shape is well-known to be one of the key elements to STEALTH.

    • @drebei901
      @drebei901 Месяц назад +1

      The laws of physics is also the same in China and the US. LoL

    • @proakis6429
      @proakis6429 Месяц назад +1

      @@drebei901 True, the only possibility is that after considering all the uses of a fighter jet, including top speed, takeoff/landing, missile payload, stealth, combat capabilities and so on, both countries arrived at the F-35's design as the 'only solution,' which would explain why the two fighter jets look so similar.
      But the stealth ability would also be a function of both jet size and absorbing material. We will see how good J35 can evade radar in the future...

  • @nosaltadded2530
    @nosaltadded2530 Месяц назад +7

    Cheap Chinese knock offs! By the way, cheap tofu dreg copy of the F-22.

    • @月隐谷
      @月隐谷 Месяц назад +5

      Go back to sleep. When you wake up, you can't accept the world that has been surpassed.😢😢😢

    • @cryptohornbill9658
      @cryptohornbill9658 Месяц назад +1

      Deal with it 😂😂

    • @jeffgao
      @jeffgao Месяц назад +2

      keep crying~~~

    • @城市野狗
      @城市野狗 Месяц назад +1

      你长了两只眼睛,跟我太像了,麻烦挖掉一个,否则我起诉你抄袭我!!!!!

    • @MikeY-gh1xq
      @MikeY-gh1xq Месяц назад +1

      @@nosaltadded2530 man, you really sound uneducated.

  • @airjordan8778
    @airjordan8778 Месяц назад

    Took them 20 years to copy and make a Temu f35.

    • @wakwong1723
      @wakwong1723 Месяц назад

      Temu goods are a gift to the poor, and you only deserve to buy Temu goods.Temu

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Месяц назад

      Temu failed to make J35 stunning skydiving, autopilot to nowhere and swimming in the ocean.

  • @strongme80
    @strongme80 Месяц назад +26

    The CCP also stands for Ctrl Copy Paste.

    • @partricklin9749
      @partricklin9749 Месяц назад +6

      u mean US, bot R and D , is replicate and duplicate, its double copy patse

    • @jasonmayday
      @jasonmayday Месяц назад +7

      They cannot replicate the crashing F-22 and F-35 submarines.🤣

    • @binchen
      @binchen Месяц назад

      All good if it's copied from STEM smarter Russians. If it's copied from Boeing, then we are doomed.

    • @BSPBuilder
      @BSPBuilder Месяц назад +1

      You need an eye doctor. J35 has two engines while F35 only has one.

    • @jye7027
      @jye7027 Месяц назад +1

      Typical sbt

  • @PK-cj1pg
    @PK-cj1pg 8 дней назад +1

    Shockers!!! 😮
    Xi's Xmas gifts to Trump:
    Two 6th Gen Stealth Fighters ("copycats" again 😅)
    076 Drone Carrier (Elon: I told you) &
    KJ-3000 (I see ya F22 F35 😂)
    The Pentagon should be alarmed!

  • @anthonylundkovsky5643
    @anthonylundkovsky5643 Месяц назад +5

    Looks so familiar as if we🇺🇸developed it 20 years ago

    • @kenw.4539
      @kenw.4539 Месяц назад

      It's not a "fat" plane like the financially disastrous F-35. It's more sleek and maneuverable. The Pentagon's fighter plane "Mafia" who designed the F-16 and A-10 workhorses have always said the F-35 was a gimmick from the start whose principal mission was to shove as much money as possible to the MIC. If you have decades, peace and trillions of dollars to waste, eventually you will get the F-35 right. And who cares about potholes or homelessness, or unaffordable health care, as long as our ruling elites have all the COOL WEAPONS they want, we are good, right?

  • @adipurnomoification
    @adipurnomoification Месяц назад

    The quality are seen as iPhone vs Xiaomi 😂.. salam Indonesia

    • @lonelybullet1
      @lonelybullet1 Месяц назад

      What good ever came out of Indonesia ?

  • @fgygghjh4231
    @fgygghjh4231 Месяц назад +3

    Paper aircraft better than china one 😊

    • @JWscandi
      @JWscandi Месяц назад

      u must be overdosed wt cracks to hv such perception...

  • @lcssay
    @lcssay Месяц назад

    These are now available on Temu 😮😂

  • @ELcinegatto87
    @ELcinegatto87 Месяц назад +27

    Temu version of US and Soviet designs.

    • @helicopter2616
      @helicopter2616 Месяц назад +8

      like you can afford it

    • @ngheanchoong
      @ngheanchoong Месяц назад +3

      Help me buy one from Temu

    • @thomasantn
      @thomasantn Месяц назад +2

      Temu is pretty popular these days in US. Just saying.

    • @flyingaugust9142
      @flyingaugust9142 Месяц назад +1

      And it ranks the nu1 regarding e-commerce 😅

    • @partricklin9749
      @partricklin9749 Месяц назад +2

      temu is best quality you can get in US, even its mockup plane last longer than f35

  • @hh5243
    @hh5243 Месяц назад

    How many countries in the world can develop and produce fifth-generation fighter jets?

  • @JakerTheSnake
    @JakerTheSnake Месяц назад

    Magically held together with super glue and noodles.

  • @fgygghjh4231
    @fgygghjh4231 Месяц назад +3

    Tofu dreg 😂