Pretty sure none of this stuff is actually tested. Seems like its just games playing with text stuck over it that is either made up or pulled from benchmarks.
at 4k ultra u need dlls performance to cpu kick in Penalty latency is huge over 30ms inpui lag vs 16 input lag on 1440p and full hd 11 ms input lag ...so if u love lag go for it.
Hey mate there is a video from Hardware Unboxed, search on YT for ''Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Really Faster For Real-World 4K Gaming?'' Very good video with nice explanations😉😉
I would love to see a video of you making a video comparing both the 9800x3d side by side with the 285k with the same games, using different memory as you have here, and then switch up from having one left all the time and one right all the time, leaving off for half the run, which CPU is on which side, just showing the image and not the stats.. and then half way through each run, then show the stats and which side each chip is on with them stats.. I am betting nobody can really tell the difference just by looking at the image which is which chip and how many FPS it is running.. and then run the same both side by side with cinebench, and then half way through that as well, then show the stats to the end.. and lets see which chip actually computes better..
TLDR; you get only 15% fps boost on 1440p with nearly x2 RAM speed at abstract Hi-End gaming top. In real world, with 4080 super and 4k it will be 5-7% I guess. Looks not a big deal. We need evolutionary step up with memory architecture.
The data is not correct as timmings are not mentioned A really good quality 6000mhz ram can beat or be equal to 9000mhz ram with high timings as usual there are no good timing rams above 8000mhz
CUDIMM would be interesting. +10-15% fps using 9600 vs 6200 is impressive... youre the only one ive seen so far testing it... all the others just used DDR5-6000 and thats it.
![Kodak Black - Versatile 4 [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VcP_1Ua__vY/mqdefault.jpg)
Dude you need to tell us the RAM kits names and timings you used.
this is useless with out showing us the timings. a 6000 with low timings could be as fast as 9000mhz+
absolutely useless!
no will not , 8000+ fps low are 5-7% depends of game title better than 6000 ram
Pretty sure none of this stuff is actually tested. Seems like its just games playing with text stuck over it that is either made up or pulled from benchmarks.
you wish it was ;P
according amd weblog , on 9000 seri sweet spot is GSKILL Z5 NEO 6000
Sweet spot... for a good price... but clearly the ```sweet spot`` is 9600 not 6000...
if u have good mother board expensive one sweet spot is low latency high mhz and 1:1 ratio that is 6400mhz.
@@MakeSh00t 6000 and 6400 dont have difrance,,,but 6400 is very expencive ,,,so amd choose cheaper 6000
ya idk this upper ram speeds seem unlikely even on intel
Yes I know 1080 is the way but why doesn't someone do this setup (for instance) at 4K Ultra....I want to see that.
at 4k ultra u need dlls performance to cpu kick in Penalty latency is huge over 30ms inpui lag vs 16 input lag on 1440p and full hd 11 ms input lag ...so if u love lag go for it.
@@MakeSh00t So any system at 4K Ultra cant do it really well yet?
Hey mate there is a video from Hardware Unboxed, search on YT for ''Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Really Faster For Real-World 4K Gaming?'' Very good video with nice explanations😉😉
CL ?
I would love to see a video of you making a video comparing both the 9800x3d side by side with the 285k with the same games, using different memory as you have here, and then switch up from having one left all the time and one right all the time, leaving off for half the run, which CPU is on which side, just showing the image and not the stats.. and then half way through each run, then show the stats and which side each chip is on with them stats.. I am betting nobody can really tell the difference just by looking at the image which is which chip and how many FPS it is running.. and then run the same both side by side with cinebench, and then half way through that as well, then show the stats to the end.. and lets see which chip actually computes better..
What motherboard are you using that allows you to run EXPO with that high of MHz for your ram?
TLDR; you get only 15% fps boost on 1440p with nearly x2 RAM speed at abstract Hi-End gaming top. In real world, with 4080 super and 4k it will be 5-7% I guess. Looks not a big deal. We need evolutionary step up with memory architecture.
The data is not correct as timmings are not mentioned
A really good quality 6000mhz ram can beat or be equal to 9000mhz ram with high timings as usual there are no good timing rams above 8000mhz
What memories are used?
Cl timings kit ?
Да не может такого быть !
Just numbers on screen, don`t be fooled people
CUDIMM would be interesting. +10-15% fps using 9600 vs 6200 is impressive... youre the only one ive seen so far testing it... all the others just used DDR5-6000 and thats it.
afaik cudimm is not compatible with zen 5
@@wills.5762 depends on the motherboard, MSI confirms their X870/E Motherboards supports CUDIMM with the bypass feature for Zen5
@@wills.5762 depends on the motherboard, MSI confirms their X870/E motherboards Supports CUDIMM with the bypass feature for Zen5
this is real? or...
no
@chrisrussell6237 ,c
lmao
this is very useless 4090 why not show 4k also...