Shah Bano to now: What SC verdicts on maintenance for Muslim women says
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
- The Supreme Court, Wednesday, held that a Muslim woman can demand maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as the Muslim Women (Protection on Divorce Act), 1986.
In this video, Apoorva Mandhani explains what the court said.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exclusive content, special privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for Special benefits: theprint.in/subscribe/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connect with ThePrint
» Subscribe to ThePrint: theprint.in/subscribe/
» Subscribe to our RUclips Channel: bit.ly/3nCMpht
» Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
» Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
» Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
» Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
» Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintIndia
» Find us on Spotify: spoti.fi/2NMVlnB
» Find us on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/3pEOta8
Nice. One more step towards UCC
Anyone who calls themselves liberal, should support this !
Apparently Indian Liberals are of a different breed😂
Yeah. As if women are not getting enough alimony already.
Indian left are not liberal in the true sense n very hypocritical. Their liberal views n feminism begins with Hindus n ends with Hindus. Secularism doesn’t apply there
We do what about it?
@@bratwurstmitbiryaniPopcorn for now
Supreme court is qble to take this decision only because its non congress government.
so suddenly maintenance becomes good because it's on muslims... nice... and the supreme Court admits that women are free loaders.... what happened to independent free women?
@@syedhisham2594 That is not just for muslim. Jab hindu or muslim same hi hai to laws bhi same hi hone chahiye. Law religion ke base pe rakhna tha to Pakistan banaya hi kyu.
@@akash-yb5ds maintenance is bad for Hindus also... It is universally a biased law... When I don't have any right in my wife's money then why does she have a right in my money?
@@akash-yb5ds some matters are religious like marriage and divorce where there is difference in almost all the religions... Your marriage is different from our marriage and the same for others... When there are differences.. Then how can they be a single law... Can the speed limit for a plane and a car be the same?... And furthermore alimony is not there even in Hinduism.. So why are we are including a western cruel concept as part of our law?
@@syedhisham2594 Its a different argument, ... but under the law all women are equal, ... you should go and argue the same for all humans .. and change the law ..
The supreme court has time and again protected civil rights and rallied against any form of discrimination. This verdict is emblematic of this fact.
discrimination in favor of women.. is what maintenance and alimony is... why does a woman have a right in the wealth which she has not acquired by herself.... free loading lazy buggers... instead of removing it universally they are including where this black law doesn't exist...
I wholeheartedly welcome and support this progressive secularising judgement of the Honourable Supreme Court of India.
I think BJP should move towards UCC now.
Not with the kind of coalition they have, they would have done it if they got full majority themselves.
@@chanakyabharat756 They dont amendments. Simple majority is required. One nation one poll reqauires amendments
@@amritpalsingh3293 let's see, I doubt if BJP takes any big changes this time
@@chanakyabharat756 Congress was in similar number of seats in 1991. Yet, they made monumental changes that are affecting us to this day. Where there is a will,there is a way. And that is the only one left out of there core agenda, 377 and Ram Temple being already over.
BJP gonna do major laws & works in the End last 1 year , People are Ghazini they'll forget what BJP in did if they do now
BJP's focus is on rejoining Shiv Sena
My kushti 💪🏾 Queen 👑💯😍
Crisp and clear!
I just came here for my studies
Thanks for the brief description on this issue
The rest of the comments can proceed as you deem fit.
Sonia madam should say something about this.
Why does it matter to you? She has retired from active electoral politics.
@@shubhangbahadur7112 she can still give her opinion. She has spoken about her husband s achievements many times. Even after retirement.
She will cry just like she did for t@rrorists.
@@shubhangbahadur7112 Isn’t she still a Rajya Sabha member?? She was sitting next to Kharge in the latest session!
It's a shame that it's getting implemented so late
what freeloading scheme for lazy people😂
@@syedhisham2594 then allow women to work outside home. But mullahs gets heart attack of women starts working 😂😂😂😂😂
@@syedhisham2594 let muslim men also had the fun. 😂😂😂😂.
@@Veeda-dv8io you need some english classes😂 let and had in the same sentence.. Wah...
@@syedhisham2594 and muslim men needs to pay alimony 😂😂😂😂😂
What about men's rights 😢😢
This video was made enroute to date😂
Enjoy New type of dress code for news anchor😅
Want to see pappu with red book😂😂
With slogan jai samvidhaan 😂😂
This people always thinks religion is above the country
Black law this law
Anchor is in a party dress need to be in business casuals
Rajib Gandhi is inhuman for torturing divorced Muslim women.