Both the Germans, and in a lesser extent the Japanese, had been portrayed favourably by the Muslim world because they didn't colonise Muslim countries until WW2. In fact, it was England, France, the Netherlands, Russia and China that were considered enemies of the Muslims. For example, during the 1941 coup in Iraq, the Golden Square enjoyed German support and also aimed to invite Japanese warships to land in Basra, which shocked Britain so much so that Britain had to invade Iraq.
@@abuqadr629 Indonesia was indeed a Muslim majority country but it wasn't under Muslim control, but under Dutch control (Dutch East Indies/Oostindien). So their objective was more about removing European/US hegemony in the region, hence they invaded French Indo-China and Singapore/Malaya too. The Phillipines were under US control at the outbreak of WW2.
“The British went on fighting like lions against the Germans, the Italians, the Japanese, but they couldn’t or wouldn’t stand up to the Arabs at all, though much of the Arab world was openly pro-Nazi.” ― Golda Meir, My Life
If Hitler had won in Europe then he may well have changed the state religion to Islam. He was a big fan of Mohammad and Islamic imperialist aggression, though he would insist on being the leader of his Islamic state.
People like to debate alternate timelines where everything went perfectly for Germany, but we basically already live in that timeline, and they still lost.
@@genovayork2468 The instant they chose to invade the Soviet Union was when they lost. The UK had waved them off but was isolated mostly on their island, the US was an ocean away and still neutral pre-Pearl Harbor. Instead of consolidating their position the Germans chose to launch their plans early, killing millions for their supposed dream, which of course ended up failing anyways, destroying Germany in its entirety and having the country be split for half a century.
@@genovayork2468 do you really believe germany could win ww2? Go watch other cc videos about that and see how "lucky" the germans were for them to even beat france
You could argue Hitler has is a religious figure. He's the secularist devil who despite the actions and death counts of others is always considered the ultimate evil.
If it all went to plan. One thing would not have changed after the world. Oil. As Germany grew after a victory it would have need more and more oil. They wouldnt have allowed the MIddle East to carry on under puppet states. It would have been too risky for future oil supply. WW2 was the first war that the powers started to think about oil. With Germany's fateful move into southern Russia.
Puppet states worked for america why wouldnt they work for germany? Especially if the people wanted to cooperate because the germans kicked the british and french out?
@@genovayork2468 quite the opposite. Even at its peak the wehrmacht was not fully mechanized, and serious restrictions were already in place for private uses of petroleum (personal cars, etc). If they had had more success, more complete mechanization would have been sought and more, not less, demand for oil would have been generated, and not just for the war industry.
The Jewish idea of the Chosen People existed for millennia before national socialism was invented. It’s also not a superiority thing. The Jews were just chosen to follow the rules of the Torah, while gentiles don’t have to.
he saw them as useful idiots and good cannon fodder for his cause, he initially disliked the Spaniards and Portuguese but he later admired them for they were probably the best fighters in the Wehrmacht, same thing with certain Eastern European ethnicities like the Ukrainians which he initially did not like but they proved to be very good fighters. He was there to use people, Hitler only really liked Aryans and honorary Aryans.
Party politics updated before the end of the war, slavics could be aryans because the aryan blood of fallen soldiers would concentrate and aryanize the living ones... somehow, lol, crazy religion.
@@iamzedudeyouknowwhatiemean you have Proof of something that never happened,only Spain Sent volunteers to germany who would form the blue division and fight in the Eastern front, Portugal never did that
it's best to clarify that the Arabs that appealed to Nazism didn't appeal to any supremacism, but it was in an effort against the Europeans that colonized them. Countless reports and testimonies are being made to this day by elders that the Germans treated the Arabs better than the rest, and to forget that Churchill alone killed millions of Indians through sanctions alone should not be neglected. I'm mentioning this because I know people like to use these arguments against Arabs, although the creator of the video is aware enough to acknowledge that the argument would only be against themselves. Also, 11:25 -> This was common sentiment and still is because the notion that the British bought and gave lands to the Jews was a large scam: many were either forced to sell, had their lands stolen and nearly all Jews by 1940 were foreigners wanting to create an independent Jewish state on Palestinian land despite being refugees 2-3 decades prior. I know this video isn't about this and it's why it wasn''t remotely discussed, but I think its important for the viewers to note, as the way you said it kind of gave a poor connotation Good video and good narration. I loved it. I do think you should have a section at the end of each video that lists notable sources and a bibliography though.
The North African colonial Arabs were “colonised” (actually more of a military occupation) as a result of a millennia of attacks on Europe. It was effectively a suppression of piracy and slaver attacks on the northern Mediterranean coast (and the southern English coast to boot). The anti Jewish propaganda was about Arab (specifically Muslim) supremacy.
My family that never left northern Israel before the kingdom of Israel even exist didn't like the British But the Arab nationalists forced them to take sides 1890-1948.
The germans simply couldn't afford to treat the muslims badly. Geopolitically, the germans and muslims simply had the same enemy... but they were far from being friends. In an alternate world where germany wins, they would barely be able to occupy the Caucasus for decades. So directly subjugating the middle east would be a pipedream at best
@@lostvayne104 "dO yOuR rEsEaRcH" bruh... If someone is a serious historian, even at an amateur level on RUclips, they should absolutely list their sources.
22:22 to anyone wondering: The Wealth Tax was not levied on Christians specifically. The government gave quotas to each tax collector, an exorbitant amount, which the tax collector was required to collect in any way they saw fit. Coupled with the short preparation time (13 days if I'm not mistaken), all this incompetency resulted in the fuck up we now know as the Wealth Tax. Since the government was unable to fulfill its intended aim of taxing the war-time income of large landowners and food traders, a second tax was introduced shortly after called the "Agricultural Produce Tax".
The Ottoman Empire levied various taxes that disproportionately affected religious minorities, including Christians and Jews. One of the most notable taxes was the *jizya*, a poll tax imposed on non-Muslims. This tax was part of the broader system of *dhimmi* status, which granted certain protections to non-Muslims in exchange for their subordination and additional taxes. In addition to the jizya, minorities were often subject to other taxes and obligations, such as: 1. Harac: A land tax levied on non-Muslims. 2. Boys' Tax (Devshirme): A system where Christian boys were taken from their families, converted to Islam, and trained to serve in the Ottoman military or administration. While not a monetary tax, it was a form of human taxation. 3. Various local and regional taxes: These could vary significantly depending on the time period and specific locality within the Ottoman Empire.
@@thebeatnumber All these things are true (except Kharaj, that was more of a Persian thing; Ottoman State used Kharaj to tax all it's subjects, not just non-Muslims), though I don't particularly understand why you felt the need to comment these things under a comment talking about the 1943 Turkish Wealth Tax.
@@onatdeveci5502 Because the 1942 Wealth Tax was inspired by earlier Ottoman tax regimes. Turkey's Wealth Tax (Varlık Vergisi) of 1942, disproportionately targeted non-Muslim minorities, including Jews, Greeks, and Armenians. The tax was introduced as a measure to raise funds during World War II but had severe discriminatory effects. Non-Muslim citizens were often assessed much higher tax rates than their Muslim counterparts, leading to significant financial hardships and expropriation of properties for many minority families.
@@thebeatnumber @thebeatnumber This is entirely false. As I've said, the tax itself was not intended for the non-Muslim population. It is true that non-Muslims were taxed to a disproportionate amount, but so was Muslims. The difference was that when Muslims (like the Koç family) received the tax demands, they contacted the local party branch and were successful in bringing the demanded tax down; Non-Muslims who were close to the local party branch (such as Taptas, Keresteciyan, etc.) also got the same treatment. The Wealth Tax assessed %68 of the Tax from İstanbul and %32 of the Tax from Anatolia and Thrace. 430 Miliion Liras were demanded by the Government, it was left up to the Burocrats to collect them in 13 days. Muslims paid ≈107 Million, Non-Muslims ≈170 Million, ≈13 Million Liras were paid by the non-Citizens; the government forgave 140 Million Liras of Christian tax debt, lowering their demanded tax from 310 Million Liras to 170 Million. On average; Dönmeh citizens paid 2 times the amount a Muslim citizen would, a non-Citizen payed 3 times the amount a Muslim citizen would, and non-Muslim citizen paid 5 times the amount a Muslim citizen would. At the time; people who facilitated trade in Turkey were non-Muslims, the majority of craftsmen and tradesmen were also of non-Muslim origin. The Wealth Tax aimed to tax the war-time earnings of the traders (whose majority was of non-Muslim descent) AND the large landowners (who were basically all Muslim at this point). Wealth Tax succeeded (though unfairly) in taxing the Urban traders' wealth, but utterly failed in taxing the large landowners. That is why a sister tax to the Wealth Tax was introduced: the Agricultural Produce Tax. Poor planning and incompetent execution on the government's part lead to the Wealth Tax disaster, the sectarianism of the tax collectors and party chapter leaders (whom were elected, and were not appointed by the central party) caused the Wealth Tax disaster. The Wealth Tax had no structural basis similar to that of the Islamic Jizya or the Kharaj, though in practice it is true that the Tax looks like the Kharaj Tax.
@@onatdeveci5502 Actually it was intended for the non muslim population because they were on average wealthier and better educated than the muslim population. Only about 3% of the Ottoman Empire could read and write at the time Kamel Ataturk turned the Ottoman Empire from an islamic caliphate/monarchy into a republic and the overwhelming majority of the 3% were made up of remnants of Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks who had survived the genocide/ethnic cleansing which the Turks carried out against them. Turkey in the 1950s had about the same literacy levels as Holland in the 16th Century.
Genuine question-- why do you not have a bibliography for your videos? Your videos seem very well researched it just seems like a shame to not include one
Tbh I’m not surprised Arabs were more keen on A.H than the English or French they needed independence from them so A.H probably wanted to make Arabs his Allie’s but we all know that we would barely get anything maybe just Iraq Saudi Arabia or Oman if even we’re lucky enough to not get annexed or become a colony of turkey italy or Germany
You wouldn't have gotten Iraq or Saudi arabia either as independent non-vassal states either. If germany had been more successful, they would have seized more or less complete control of those areas too, because they desperately needed oil. Arabs would have been given nominal control over those areas and states not possessing significant oil production. In the fullness of time, in an alternate history, he probably would have 'cleansed' the whole area and given it to the Turks or maybe whatever he considered Aryan Syrians (in the best case scenario).
@@samwise1790a HIGHLY doubt they wouldve survived the desert because remember ever country who 'colonized' the felix only invaded its coasts and with semi-advanced stuff they had i high doubt it
@susknight9410 "im right everyone else is wrong, everything I dislike is propaganda no matter how logical.. and everything I like is the truth no matter how illogical"
@susknight9410 oh you mean like ARA, FAL (Fee Arab Nation), NBP, PLO, Houthi, Amin al Husseini, Muhhamad Rashid Rida, Adolf Hitler, Golden Square of Iraq, PLF, Saddam Husseini, DFLP, Nuremberg these had absolutely nothing to do with Nazis? Are you absolutely sure?
Jews and Arabs were two tribes that are closely related. Especially Palestinians and Jews have always lived in peace together in the past. It’s really sad to see how bad things are now between them. I hope they can find peace again and not be divided.
What are you Talking about? " Jews and Arab Closely Related "? Over 80% of Modern Jewery Are ASHKENAZI JEWS. Ashkenazi Jews Are Jews Who Trace Their ANCESTSRY To Eastern Europe Along the Rhine River ( Germany, Poland, Lithuania etc. ) And Russia. Then You Have Sephardic Jews ( Spain, Portugal, Morocco Algeria etc. ). Then you have MIZRAHI JEWS who have Middle Eastern ANCESTRY ( Iraq, Iran, Yemen etc. ). You also have The Beta Israel Jews From Ethiopia. THUS: MAJORTY OF MODERN JEWS are GENETICALLY & ETHNICALLY EUROPEAN I.e ASHKENAZI JEWS. German Polish Lithuanian Hungarian Ukrainian Russian
@@zafred6424 so what's the problem? You found persons who have the same view and by the way, I didn't read his comment, it doesn't mean I stole his comment, got it?
Regarding Egypt You failed to mention that the wafid party was the majority party and it was a nationalist party with somewhat liberal directions and although they were anti British the British trusted them to form a government as they were more anti fascism
Losers, had they sent the Egyptian army to fight alongside the British forces in Egypt and Libya, we would have had an experienced military able to defeat the jews in 1948. The defeat of Palestine led to the experienced brainlets Gamal and his boys to coup d'etat in 1952...
Jabzy, would you give an chance to in an possible future think on an Golden Circle video? On the plans of it. Awesome video btw, always doing an awesome work.
@@mazlankaramat Zionism discriminates against anyone non Jewish on the basis of”Jewish Holy Land” Especially Arabs, Muslims and Christians alike. So radical that many Jews are strongly against Zionism, and many of which are the biggest voice for Palestinian Freedom
This video has made a lot of people show their true colors, you can read people from the discussed countries trying to defend their fascist leaders who were just as bad as Hitler.
At first the promised map would see Kurdistan Created, all Arab countries to the Peninsula united under 1 Kingdom (Apart from Lebanon whom many Christians were afriad of being apart of a majority Muslim Kingdom) and potentially Israel being created. But the British and French never keep promises
And in its place, completely different conflicts would have occurred. This misplaced overemphasis on how EU split the nations up being the “cause” of conflicts that followed is overstated, overly simplistic, and basically can only be done if you blindfold yourself. The history of that region is conflict. Always. And the power dynamics would continue to fuel new conflicts. As do the ideological differences, and the ethnic ones. Even if you cleanly put every into nice buckets, and gave them states of their own. That wouldn’t stop the aggression. They’d just be fighting each other using different flags. There’d be more invasions instead of pogroms and civil wars. No matter how you slice it, the more powerful ones would aim to dominate the weaker ones and suppress the local population to their rule and religion. And we’d be right back to where we are now. Where the ME has always been. And where it will continue to be long after you and I are dead and buried.
Lets start with Algeria. At first France took Algeria and gave rights to Jews to have a loyal population who would also pay taxes, Muslims had no rights, Arabic Banned, and France hoping Algerians would become more and more French. During WW2 Muslims fought under the Free France Campaign to secure independence and France promised them and many African colonies said independence to help. After WW2 ended Algerians celebrated on the streets if Algiers securing independence before France firing on the crowd in a massacre. France denied giving Algeria independence specifically because they were seen as France proper like Corsica, they did finally give Muslim rights and unbanned Arabic (almost resulted in Arabic being forgotten) but to the Muslim Algerians they kept trying peace and they weren’t given independence so they went to a brutal Revolution to secure independence of Algeria. The Jews who got rights from the start sided with the French and helped undermine Muslim malitas in the war which caused Muslims to see the Jews as traitors and deported them to France during the war and after the war. In the 1960’s Algeria finally secured its independence
My great grandfather fought both the French and the N🇩🇪* on their own lands LOL, he was sentenced to 20 years of prison by France but quickly escaped in a week and was never found again by France, he lived a happy life till his death and even went to France twice under a fake identity in his old days.
@@eltotierIt was because the Free France Campaign saw France acknowledge that any who helped would gain independence and if they lied about it then after WW2 France didn’t have the military capabilities to stop any revolution across its many colonies so it granted said colonies independence except for Algeria because it essential to them and it was a brutal brutal war for independence.
@@eltotier I mean, at the time, his family needed money, that’s why he became a soldier. To him the entire geopolitical side of everything wasn’t of much importance, he just wanted to help his family out financially back in Morocco.
@@eltotier He himself after the war in Europe and in Vietnam (Because was also sent to fight in the Indochina War) praised the French on a lot of things. French Colonial rule over Morocco wasn’t like that in say The Congo or Kenya. Average Moroccans didn’t feel like they were suppressed or anything, plus the French built lots of the infrastructure Morocco still uses to this day. In my Grandfathers old village, most buildings are still from the French colonial period, the schools, the bus stations, the Police Dep. Building. Of course, by saying all this I do not condone anything that resembles Modern Imperialism, I am just stating that different people had differing opinions about it at the time.
@@trevornorfolk3103 The earliest known records for such is 1941. And last i recalled, they were hella confident they were going to win against the soviets. Pretty sure germany recruited the arabs just for manpower alone.
Thank you for this. I knew about the mufti of Jerusalem's connection with Hitler. I didn't know about all this other stuff going on in the Arab world during WW II. This shows how widespread these connections with Hitler were before Rommel lost at El Alamein. Its also good to know that not all of the Arab nations fell in line with Hitler's plans for their Jews. They knew he would simply turn on them next.
@@EndingSimple the "mufti" was a donmeh converts parading around as a muslim. Same as when they dressed as arabs planting milkchurn bombs in king david hotel then try blame egyptsame when they openly attacked uss liberty and tried to blame egypt. Just like the donmeh Caruso brothers parading around as muslims pushing a socialist movement which brewed up the armenian genocide to ensure bauer-rothchild Baku oil enterprises pipelines were laid in Armenia. Proxy war after proxy war after deception after lies. Same old plays from the same tattered old play book. Just like israeli iron dome interceptor missle hitting golan heights then becalling hezbollah did it. 1-the logistics of the missle, the ordinance of the missle, the damage left, was iron dome interceptor missle. 2- the syrian muslim druze in the golan are NOT israeli citizens, they DENOUNCE israeli citizenship and are rioting due to israeli claims of them being ANY part of israel. Yet Hezbollah was blamed "justifying" an open attack in Beirut. Saaaaaame ooooooold plaaaaaays
Many Muslims (not in government) who began hearing of H. Attacks in the Holocaust especially in Palestine began revolting against the British. Holding up signs and began chanting demanding the British send Jews to Palestine to save them from an Anti-Semite Europe. There were little to no Pro Germany sentiment among Muslims except in India where many Hindus and Muslims began working with the Japanese a bit to overthrow British control over India. As well as some in Indonesia who believed after the war they would be forced to be under the Netherlands again
It's a bit inconducive to elucidate theology from the political aspirations of a madman. Hitler's fanaticism ultimately stemmed from his nationalistic pride which is apparent in the "German Christian" movement to which he admitted to be. I'm not Christian myself, but his version is definitely not representative of Christian theology. Those trying to ascribe his views with that of Islam are also extremely ignorant as his actions are not reflective in any Islamic doctrine. He did express admiration for Muhammad but also Confucius and Buddha as leaders of spiritual sustenance. His seemingly affectionate tone for the people of the middle east were all but political in a strategic attempt to undermine the western colonial powers who controlled these regions, to capitalize on the (justifiably) anti-Western sentiment in these colonial territories. It's a shame that pseudo-historians today in their hatred of Muslims try to shift responsibility on Islam for no justifiable reason as his actions go against any mainstream Islamic belief. I would encourage everyone to not be so regressive in their theological debates and to let a cruel, immoral man such as Hitler to simply be what he was, a genocidal lunatic.
Well, the early Islamic Empires did help Europe break free from the savagery of the Dark Ages and paved the way towards the French Revolution - inspired by the Arab Islamic scholar Averroes (Ibn Rushd).
Just no. There a small renaissance after the crusades were greek and roman books lost in the west were found and looted again in translated arabic. Then after the fall of Constantinople the Christians fleeing from Islamic savagery helped Italy start the renaissance ( english is not my first language) By the time of the French revolution the European civilization had already moved far beyond anything from the arab world.
@@islammehmeov2334 they are gay but still better than your country by long miles, that is why all muslims become refugees in europe or western countries 😭😭😂😂🤣🤣
Pathetic. Jews have an absolute right to live in their own land. Arabs are the invading peoples, whom have appropriated the identity of Ancient Greek colonists. Bizarre.
@@thanetitan4246 “Hitler wanted to murder the entirety of the Middle East” and you say Israel defending themselves with less than 50k deaths is worse. I think you just hate the Jude.
@@GokuResho definetely not. His phenotype is very similar to Karamanoglu line of Turks and a branch of my ancestor roamed there where he was born. He waa bozkurt, Grey Wolf. So wise and loved reading as Karamanoglu lines genetic heritage. We are blonde people, original Turks, not iranian or slav mix.
@@aslisimmm "We are blonde people, original Turks" lmfao, you are indistinguishable from Iranians, because the original Turks (who looked identical to Mongols) despised their own phenotype, so they preferred to marry out of their own race. The "Turks" you see in turkey who have light features are largely genetically Slavic. They, along with the majority of Turkish citizens, are only nominally Turkish. You can find the real Turkish phenotype in Kyrgyzstan, which is basically a Scythian-Chinese hybrid.
i dont support the n*zis but many western Europeans believed in a aryan superior race or similar ideologies such as Winston Churchill. However when Germany began to take appeasements from Britain, Winston was against the British conceding. he was not against the German pro aryan views. during ww2 Britain's witnessed the out cry caused by anti- n*azis, so following the war, they decided to change their view. There are many examples of Winston Churchills views such as his view of the Bengal's in northern Indian subcontinent and his beliefs that Arabs were of the lower people in society.
15:10 this newspaper? was that an Arab news source? because not everything labed Palestine was Arab at the time, a good example being a newspaper by the name "the Palestine post" which after Israel became indapendent was renamed to "the Jerusalem post"
You are still trying to draw lines between Atatürk and Armenians or Hitler, Atatürk himself said multiple times the Nazi Party and Hitler was nuts more so he had literally zero ties with Armenian events happening as he was in Gallapoli at the time. Stop repeating this narrative you garnered from wikipedia.
Again you are wrong about Refik Saydam and Nihal Atsız. Atsız was racist but pre-islam Turkic identity were already being explored for 30 years by that time and Turanist (pan-Turkic) ideas were present more than a century. Wealth tax again was not aimed towards people from any religious groups more so it impacted secular Turks which were captains of the Young Turkish Republics industry. Please correct these. Also Turkey accepted many jewish peoplez from France, especially some of the most fundamental scientific and academic developments were developed under such scientists in collaboration with Turkish ones. Taxes were a set amount for each citizen and Turkey never once organised labor camps out of prisons which is standart even now. You are misrepresenting Turkish stance. Turkey did not harbor favor or hate towards Jewish or Kurdish people during this time frame, it was strict survival of the state and the people.
Shah's refund!!! What a lie! We obliged under the condition that Iran is a naturally peaceful nation, but allies, they cowardly invaded us, and as a result, 4 million Persians died...
I would like to see a series on “what if the loser won?”, focusing on US presidential elections from 1803 to 2012 and what would happen if the losers won
I sometimes met youngsters in Southeast Asia who either make light of the NS and its war crimes, or outright idolizes the skinny mustache man. sometimes during their rants, I told them "If the party is still in power and they saw you, they will see you just as another person from a lesser race. You think they will make you honorary Aryan?" This video kind of scared me. Because if there is precedent of cooperation between NS and their religion... maybe that argument won't be strong enough to deter them from being na zis... in Southeast Asia...
None of what you say is true because Hitler incorporated Asians into the third reich There was Turkish, Pakistani, Indian, and many other Asian Waffen SS divisions And yeah Hitler wanted to kill the Asian so bad that his greatest ally was Japan lol If you actually read his book you would even see that he believed the Japanese and Chinese to be an actual more advanced race and culture than his own Tell me you gobbled up all the propaganda they spoonfed you in school without telling me
as a fellow Indonesian, i know what you're talking about. Unfortunately many of our people got radicalized with this Anti-Semitic + Anti Western rhetoric to the point of extreme, all due to idiocy and fundamentalism
It’s ideological origins was both academic socialist and revivalist nationalism like in Germany. Michel Afleq saw a good model for Arabia. Unfortunately for him, most others had alternative views so that’s partly why no united Baathist Arabia occurred
Literally multiple people said they would not differentiate between Jews and Muslims as they are our brothers, look at Algeria, fuck Italian controlled Libya. Today “Jews” are killing muslims who wanted them in to protect them but many true Jews are against this indiscriminate murder. We are all brothers and sisters, Jew Muslim Christian atheist Buddhist Hindu et al. Monied interests just want us fighting amongst ourselves.
Ataturk was a hardcore nationalist, ok he wasn’t a nazi but he was still extreme in his beliefs and all you Turks today still worship him. There’s different issues there lol
@@roronoazoro2970 he is ündeed nationalist but he never see other race as lower while he tried to find full potential of turkish people , he is not facist or racist at all he knows 6 languages
the amount of backstabbing the arabs did is crazy to me, they first backstabbed the ottomans, then the britans, then the italians then the germans then themselves what a weird people man hahahahah
You're literally just saying shit 😭. The Ottomans throughout the start of the 20th century pushed for an empire wide turkization campaign in order to homogenize the empire's populace to align more with the Turkish leaders. The British and French worked along side select groups of Arab leader (Sharif Hussein ibn Ali) in order to establish Arab states and take land back from the Ottomans who were actively ethnically cleaning parts of modern day Iraq, Syria, Armenia, and Lebanon. The British and French then backstabbed the Arab populace with the Sykes Picot agreement that divided up the Middle East into separate European spheres of influence. The British originally had promised the Arab leaders and their populace their goal of a Pan-Arab state. The Italians on the other hand were engaging in mass ethnic cleansing of Libya in order to create Italy's "forth shore" which was rhetorical fascist project to establish Italian colonies in North Africa and eventually annex the land. Why should the Arab people be loyal to any of these groups that essentially wanted to steal their land and genocide them?
9:44 the tiger symbol was for the continuation of the Tipu Sultan Empire people both Nazi and INA Army. Tipu Sultan did not die he carried on to Europe and became known as Shakespeare with his stories. Any way he was involved in creating the Industrial Age where he worked with the Nazi members filed to his liking in bio data. As where he came from every one looked the same and in Europe it was quite mixed so Hitler carried out the Royal request for my Grandfather the only Emperor of the Holy Empire and only descendant of Emperor Maximilian as the British had to support as he was also the only descendant of Alfred the Great. He was also a previous Pope of Rome known as the Innocent series. ⚡️🤴🏽🕉🔺➕
Actually there are no evident Sources that hitler really said that. Only one French orientalist who can’t really say from where he got this quote, so it’s nonsense
@@Tummamu No, I'm arab but we don't all share the same values. A gulf arab is vastly different from a levant arab, look at the difference between Dubai and Baghdad for example. A total arab federation can stay a dream.
@@demtions Your answer is irrelevant. He asked whether it was the dream of every Muslim or not, and it is. What you stated is one of the challenges that needs to be vanquished for that to happen.
Da hooman rights are gаy tbh. They rightfully exploit our stupidity against us. You will vanish if you at the very least don't restrict these rights for the auslander
Islam is the complete and superior way of life given to us by our Creator. If that bothers you so much, cry about it now and cry again when you meet your Lord and see how stupid you were to reject His chosen religion.
Don't exhaust yourself, as you will be alone the day you leave this world (what a relief), but here's a nice proverb : "too long it is the life of the dog".
The mufti of Jerusalem was to have parts of it. Italy was to have parts of it. Iran and Afghanistan, wooed at some point, parts of central Asia. Strangely, Hitler deemed superfluous to support the Iraki against the British, losing a golden opportunity and led to have Vichy France lose Syria and Lebanon to the Free Frenxh.
Are YOU for real? The map doesn't show Pakistan. It shows a proposed Greater Afghanistan, which includes parts of what was then British India, which later became Western Pakistan. Basically, the Germans wanted to appeal to the Afghans by removing the Durrand line and extending Afghanistan's borders to the Indus River. Afghanistan would gain the Pashtun-populated parts of Pakistan, but also the Karachi port in Sindh which would end Afghanistan's status as land-locked.
King abdulaziz of saudi arabia knew not to touch this conflict especially when he knew that other than the 5 million supporters he has non exists outside of the allied provinces. The war was just gonna chew through Saudi Arabia like it's nothing even if it was supported by all the allies. WW2 had 0 benefits for the house of saud and choosing sides meant loosing allies.
Growing up when we did some thing audaciously inappropriate for our lack of power as kids my mom would ask us if we were king Farooq We had no idea there was an actual king Faruk. We never learned about this. We thought she was being silly.
0:22 He believed that Islam brought CULTURE and SCIENCE to Spain Well, it did! Go watch the documentary "When The Moors Ruled Europe" Many scientific inventions have been introduced to Europe. How about the number 0, fountains, agricultural waterways, gear for surgery. All Arab inventions, boy! Don't be so petty. Islam was in Spain flourishing for 700 years. You think we nothing happened? 😂
@@niranjansrinivasan4042 No they were not, 0123456789 numerals are Arabic, oldest manuscript belonging to the Moroccan Ibn al-Yasamin. The other numerals used in the middle east are Indian.
You make no sense Middle east is egypt and fertile crescent it has nothing with being arab North africa have both arabs ,amazigh ,andulsian ,and turks and others in it Stop ur st8pied nationalist ideas
Nope. All North African countries are Arab. The majority of the population in North Africa is Arab. Coptics, berbers and native tribes do exist and are citizens of North Africa but official the countries are ARAB. nothing you can do to change that
Oh, you absolutely weren't. There was never such a case of controlling the narrative of who's the bad guy than after WW2. Even WW1 paled in comparison, though it did have it's own shifts. The entire fact by that could be said by the way you whitewashed any Soviet crime done in Eastern Europe in the favor of "an alliance", even though most of Eastern Europe saw the Soviets as the bigger evil for a REASON, even the previously friendly government of Romania.
@@RazorsharpLTMost of Eastern Europe believed the Soviet Union to be the greater evil until they lived over N*zi occupation. You’re clowning if you think N*zi Germany was morally grey whatsoever.
someone should have told you scholars used the term Aryan to identify the Indo-European or Indo-Germanic peoples who settled throughout India, Persia (Iran), and Europe thousands of years earlier. The term "Aryan" was originally used as an ethnocultural self-designative identity and epithet of "noble" by Indo-Iranians and the authors of the oldest known religious texts of Rig Veda and Avesta within the Indo-Iranian branch of Indo-European language family-Sanskrit and Iranian, who lived in ancient India and Iran.
I want to know how the Arabs tell their point of view about any information from these meaningless and ineffective figures, and no one talked about Hitler or Napoleon or any movement or even the history of European civilization is not important or there is something that connects the Arabs and Western Europe or even Eastern Europe, and I do not believe that there is a relationship between the Arab Islamic countries in the days of the Caliphate, which has nothing to do with it, and there is nothing to mention about whether there was a country that stopped the Islamic conquests or the expansion of the Islamic world, as this is a mistake in some countries that say that we were able to make the Caliphate be defeated or stop, as there are different ideas in the foundation. There was no people from any European country or others who made it impossible for Muslims to control Europe or other countries in the world, but the reason is that the Arab Muslims were the ones who had problems with this area that became larger, which will cause major problems, but this area was controlled, and the reason that made the Muslims stop the Islamic conquests is the fatigue of travel, and no one can benefit from making Europe part of the Islamic Caliphate Which became richer than they were before and which made them in a state of self-sufficiency and there is another reason if the topic is about Europe and the Islamic Caliphate which was stronger than everyone in one view you will understand that Europe does not have anything worthy because no one knows who they are only the Arabs know about an empire or a name that was famous among the Arabs and Muslims and they are the Romans which has a deep history and a famous name and the evidence for this talk is the example of the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabs in the past called it the Roman Sea
The Ottomans spent hundreds of years trying to conquer Europe, it is not as if they were not interested it is just from the 1600s and onward the European nations were vastly superior. It is not like the Islamic conquest stopped because a lack of interest, they simply could not compete with the Europeans anymore after the golden days of the Ottoman Empire came to an end. The reason why the European powers colonized Africa and Middle East is because it was basically free land, they were so far ahead they could take it easily. If the roles were reversed the Islamic nations would have done the same to Europe if they could.
you forgot one point Arabs are an ethnic group of tribes whose grandfather is Ismail. The problem is in the media, and even politicians and the people of North Arabia and North Africa claim to be Arabs, and this is not true.
Fascism and National Socialism are not the same thing. Stop using the words interchangeably and it’ll make more sense to you why certain groups during the war would side with fascists and not nazis or nazis and not fascists.
I expected more information about Iran-germany relations. You focused more on north Africa and Arabs while the Persians were considered pure Aryans by the nazi regime.
@@yassineanassine7905which is weird because the people from the actual caucasus are sometimes darker toned in skin than Europeans, dark hair, dark beards, usually Muslim in faith. Yet the groups belonging to other parts of Europe whose blood is actually way more mixed is thought of as more aryan or white lol
@yassineanassine7905 Myth? Just look at the Nuremberg laws. Iranians were considered pure aryans by their standards don't get butthurt over historical facts
As a nationalist I have good reasons to oppose nazism and islam altogether. Thanks for proving me right. The only good scenario for Europe would have been no world wars at all. We lost our best people for interest of non-Europeans and got nothing out of it.
@@Centurio_1 I reject all the warmongering which only got more Europeans killed. Furthermore it digusts me that they were friendly with turks,arabs and other non-Europeans while disrespecting Italians,Slavs and Greeks. Their hostility towards some European cultures rivals modern day woke leftists.
They just hated their colonial overlords. It was basically just 2 bad options but Muslim Scholars knew that the Germany 1 was worse and went against Islam and was morally wrong so sided with the British reluctantly
What about the Caucasus? You did mention Azerbaijan briefly but what about Georgia and Armenia? As I understand, thenazis were split about what Turks did to Armenians between 1915-1920, so it's interesting how they would handle that situation. It's also interesting what would their plan be for Georgia because on one hand it's Stalin's nation, and they wanted to control it, but on the other hand Georgia is the ethnicity which the philosophy of Blumenbach is based on, and Blumenbach was one of the main inspirations of their party's ideology, and he did claim that all "whites" come from Caucasus, and specifically Georgia (which was proven in 2006, and it's crazy Blumenbach got that right simple based on observation). But he also claimed that the Georgians are literally the pinnacle of "white beauty", which is ironic considering Georgians look nothing like Germans, they look much more similar to Greeks and south Italians, maybe even Lebanese and Syrian.
There are many Georgians who are as white as ghosts; I have never seen this skin shade in many Europeans, to be honest with you. They have a lot of blondes and redheads, and their facial structure is distinctly 'white.' Of course, there is variation in their skin shade between individuals, but on average, they are mostly white. The same goes for Italians and Greeks.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart that you made this video. It shows how muslims truly supported the jews. Such a shame what Israel have done since. What a way to thank us.
@@aaronrodgers77 We don’t have any issue with Jews besides the conflict in Israel. Most european countries have had an issue with them and that’s why Germany did what they did in the first place because the other countries wouldn’t take them and because anti-semestism was huge in europe. Muslims didn’t create consentration camps and gass them to death. You can’t rewrite history and blame us for something YOU did. No matter how hard you try. History is history, If the Jews were tanken care of and respected in europe and around the world. Israel wouldn’t have excisted in the first place. It excist, because they were noe safe among you. So next time. Kindly stfu.
@@shudson-o1u That is your problem. You just Google and find the first answer to you question true. Digital literacy of you is not so high. How would a genocide occure while the subjects of it is not even there and already sent to Syria. How would a genocide occure when there is not even a central government. Its extension to 1923 is just to make people think Ankara Government is bad. Because there was no longer an Ottoman Empire to blame for so they chose thier new victem as Ankara Government and Turkey.
Both the Germans, and in a lesser extent the Japanese, had been portrayed favourably by the Muslim world because they didn't colonise Muslim countries until WW2. In fact, it was England, France, the Netherlands, Russia and China that were considered enemies of the Muslims. For example, during the 1941 coup in Iraq, the Golden Square enjoyed German support and also aimed to invite Japanese warships to land in Basra, which shocked Britain so much so that Britain had to invade Iraq.
Japan colonised Indonesia and parts of Philippines that were muslim
@@abuqadr629 Indonesia was indeed a Muslim majority country but it wasn't under Muslim control, but under Dutch control (Dutch East Indies/Oostindien). So their objective was more about removing European/US hegemony in the region, hence they invaded French Indo-China and Singapore/Malaya too. The Phillipines were under US control at the outbreak of WW2.
@@simonh6371 oh yea you're right
@@abuqadr629Yes but we Indonesians still resent the japs for that short but brutal 5 years f occupation
“The British went on fighting like lions against the Germans, the Italians, the Japanese, but they couldn’t or wouldn’t stand up to the Arabs at all,
though much of the Arab world was openly pro-Nazi.” ― Golda Meir, My Life
Any plans Hitler had for non-Aryans were temporary.
If Hitler had won in Europe then he may well have changed the state religion to Islam. He was a big fan of Mohammad and Islamic imperialist aggression, though he would insist on being the leader of his Islamic state.
LMFAO@@snuscaboose1942
@@tonycorn5433 wdym 'lmfao', bro give a counter argument or stfu, like what kinda reply is that
@@harshjain3122 no he didnt ask for the knowledge, so laughing at yiu and him will do cry some more LMFAO
@@snuscaboose1942Most of his men,let alone the german people,wouldn’t have made thre transition,they still inherently saw arabs as inferior
>took over Falujjah after heavy street fighting
I guess history does repeat sometimes…
Mark Twain: "History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme."
Fun fact
During the us invasion Fallujah surrender later in 2004they rebelled
The last city standing from the invitation was qaria um ali in basar
@@Haiderboom48basra we’re our best friends they loved us Americans it was the sunnis that hated us in anbar
Don't brag about it. United States is not Germany and it will never be. In fact Germany officially is a Muslim State.
Of course the shia are more Jewish than muslim@@johnelway9879
In addition to being of course immensely evil, Hitler was extremely overconfident in his limited knowledge of history and culture.
People like to debate alternate timelines where everything went perfectly for Germany, but we basically already live in that timeline, and they still lost.
@@thesenate1844 You're conflating it with WWI, which was of course unwinnable. Germany was very close to win but unlucky in WWII.
@@genovayork2468 unlucky because Hitler was dosed with meth and stuff lol, he was already a megalomaniac but that turned it up to 20
@@genovayork2468 The instant they chose to invade the Soviet Union was when they lost. The UK had waved them off but was isolated mostly on their island, the US was an ocean away and still neutral pre-Pearl Harbor. Instead of consolidating their position the Germans chose to launch their plans early, killing millions for their supposed dream, which of course ended up failing anyways, destroying Germany in its entirety and having the country be split for half a century.
@@genovayork2468 do you really believe germany could win ww2? Go watch other cc videos about that and see how "lucky" the germans were for them to even beat france
Oh man. The comments are going to fun.
You could argue Hitler has is a religious figure.
He's the secularist devil who despite the actions and death counts of others is always considered the ultimate evil.
you mean 80% of theme need to be approved by our 1984 free speech you mean
@@godkekliveshere431 Well, if by 1984, you mean don't be a racist a-hole, then yes.
@@godkekliveshere431 You have a child's understanding of free speech
What do you mean by "fun"??????? Debate me now!
The amount of people I see still claiming Hitler was a Christian would be funny if it wasn’t so stupid
I'm dismissive of such claims, it's not like they haven't slandered the man for the last 80+ years
*claims that he was an islamophile
@@bobdollaz3391 slandered? Lmao little Hitler lover here
@@bobdollaz3391no one is slandering Hitler, he doesn’t need to be slandered. He slandered himself by murdering six million Jews.
I mean he was
If it all went to plan. One thing would not have changed after the world. Oil. As Germany grew after a victory it would have need more and more oil. They wouldnt have allowed the MIddle East to carry on under puppet states. It would have been too risky for future oil supply. WW2 was the first war that the powers started to think about oil. With Germany's fateful move into southern Russia.
If all went according to plan, they'd have Russia. More than enough oil.
Puppet states worked for america why wouldnt they work for germany? Especially if the people wanted to cooperate because the germans kicked the british and french out?
Germany would need less and less oil. Lol. Get a břåįņ.
@@genovayork2468 quite the opposite. Even at its peak the wehrmacht was not fully mechanized, and serious restrictions were already in place for private uses of petroleum (personal cars, etc). If they had had more success, more complete mechanization would have been sought and more, not less, demand for oil would have been generated, and not just for the war industry.
@@samwise1790 yeah but if they had an ally in the middle east they could simply buy it. They wouldnt need to invade as that would just be ridiculous
31:41 these are the Muslim beliefs.
✅✅✅
I wonder how forward speaking that was for it’s time. Probably very much so. Alhamdulillah
💯💯💯
Am algerian that was a big mistake
@@alsa3ka166What
The nazis - we are god’s chosen people
The Israelis - we are god’s chosen people
I can see where they learn it from
Say i know nothing about national socialism without saying so
Muslims: we are not god's chosen people as everyone is equal to Allah. Rather, if you want to be loved by god, join islam.
@@Phapchamp Israel has free healthcare and subsidized housing, they’re as close to socialist as you can get thanks to American tax dollars
The Jewish idea of the Chosen People existed for millennia before national socialism was invented. It’s also not a superiority thing. The Jews were just chosen to follow the rules of the Torah, while gentiles don’t have to.
Man learned history from temu
he saw them as useful idiots and good cannon fodder for his cause, he initially disliked the Spaniards and Portuguese but he later admired them for they were probably the best fighters in the Wehrmacht, same thing with certain Eastern European ethnicities like the Ukrainians which he initially did not like but they proved to be very good fighters. He was there to use people, Hitler only really liked Aryans and honorary Aryans.
Party politics updated before the end of the war, slavics could be aryans because the aryan blood of fallen soldiers would concentrate and aryanize the living ones... somehow, lol, crazy religion.
Portugal didnt send troops to Germany
@@alphagamer9505 he's not talking about sent troups.
Shit talking with no proofs 😂😂
@@iamzedudeyouknowwhatiemean you have Proof of something that never happened,only Spain Sent volunteers to germany who would form the blue division and fight in the Eastern front, Portugal never did that
I love your voice man I fall in sleep through your stories❤❤
it's best to clarify that the Arabs that appealed to Nazism didn't appeal to any supremacism, but it was in an effort against the Europeans that colonized them. Countless reports and testimonies are being made to this day by elders that the Germans treated the Arabs better than the rest, and to forget that Churchill alone killed millions of Indians through sanctions alone should not be neglected. I'm mentioning this because I know people like to use these arguments against Arabs, although the creator of the video is aware enough to acknowledge that the argument would only be against themselves.
Also, 11:25 -> This was common sentiment and still is because the notion that the British bought and gave lands to the Jews was a large scam: many were either forced to sell, had their lands stolen and nearly all Jews by 1940 were foreigners wanting to create an independent Jewish state on Palestinian land despite being refugees 2-3 decades prior. I know this video isn't about this and it's why it wasn''t remotely discussed, but I think its important for the viewers to note, as the way you said it kind of gave a poor connotation
Good video and good narration. I loved it. I do think you should have a section at the end of each video that lists notable sources and a bibliography though.
The North African colonial Arabs were “colonised” (actually more of a military occupation) as a result of a millennia of attacks on Europe. It was effectively a suppression of piracy and slaver attacks on the northern Mediterranean coast (and the southern English coast to boot).
The anti Jewish propaganda was about Arab (specifically Muslim) supremacy.
“Forced to sell”???? Ah so as long as the Jews are made to be the enemy, everything is right as rain???
Anyone persecuting non muslims will always be popular in the Middle East. You think it is a coincidence all those nations are 99%+ Muslim?
My family that never left northern Israel before the kingdom of Israel even exist didn't like the British
But the Arab nationalists forced them to take sides 1890-1948.
The germans simply couldn't afford to treat the muslims badly. Geopolitically, the germans and muslims simply had the same enemy... but they were far from being friends.
In an alternate world where germany wins, they would barely be able to occupy the Caucasus for decades. So directly subjugating the middle east would be a pipedream at best
24:35 “The Scarlet Pimpernel of Waziristan” is the best title ever
please drop us a list of sources for your videos please like a bibliography.
Do your research you bot
@@lostvayne104 "dO yOuR rEsEaRcH" bruh... If someone is a serious historian, even at an amateur level on RUclips, they should absolutely list their sources.
@@lostvayne104Wanting to examine the sources a video is based on is the definition of doing your own research....Bot
@@lostvayne104 maybe YOU should be more respectful bot 🤖.
@@lostvayne104 You sound like clown-bot.
Your knowledge is amazing. So many figures and details
22:22 to anyone wondering:
The Wealth Tax was not levied on Christians specifically. The government gave quotas to each tax collector, an exorbitant amount, which the tax collector was required to collect in any way they saw fit. Coupled with the short preparation time (13 days if I'm not mistaken), all this incompetency resulted in the fuck up we now know as the Wealth Tax.
Since the government was unable to fulfill its intended aim of taxing the war-time income of large landowners and food traders, a second tax was introduced shortly after called the "Agricultural Produce Tax".
The Ottoman Empire levied various taxes that disproportionately affected religious minorities, including Christians and Jews.
One of the most notable taxes was the *jizya*, a poll tax imposed on non-Muslims. This tax was part of the broader system of *dhimmi* status, which granted certain protections to non-Muslims in exchange for their subordination and additional taxes.
In addition to the jizya, minorities were often subject to other taxes and obligations, such as:
1. Harac: A land tax levied on non-Muslims.
2. Boys' Tax (Devshirme): A system where Christian boys were taken from their families, converted to Islam, and trained to serve in the Ottoman military or administration. While not a monetary tax, it was a form of human taxation.
3. Various local and regional taxes: These could vary significantly depending on the time period and specific locality within the Ottoman Empire.
@@thebeatnumber All these things are true (except Kharaj, that was more of a Persian thing; Ottoman State used Kharaj to tax all it's subjects, not just non-Muslims), though I don't particularly understand why you felt the need to comment these things under a comment talking about the 1943 Turkish Wealth Tax.
@@onatdeveci5502 Because the 1942 Wealth Tax was inspired by earlier Ottoman tax regimes. Turkey's Wealth Tax (Varlık Vergisi) of 1942, disproportionately targeted non-Muslim minorities, including Jews, Greeks, and Armenians. The tax was introduced as a measure to raise funds during World War II but had severe discriminatory effects. Non-Muslim citizens were often assessed much higher tax rates than their Muslim counterparts, leading to significant financial hardships and expropriation of properties for many minority families.
@@thebeatnumber @thebeatnumber This is entirely false. As I've said, the tax itself was not intended for the non-Muslim population. It is true that non-Muslims were taxed to a disproportionate amount, but so was Muslims. The difference was that when Muslims (like the Koç family) received the tax demands, they contacted the local party branch and were successful in bringing the demanded tax down; Non-Muslims who were close to the local party branch (such as Taptas, Keresteciyan, etc.) also got the same treatment. The Wealth Tax assessed %68 of the Tax from İstanbul and %32 of the Tax from Anatolia and Thrace. 430 Miliion Liras were demanded by the Government, it was left up to the Burocrats to collect them in 13 days. Muslims paid ≈107 Million, Non-Muslims ≈170 Million, ≈13 Million Liras were paid by the non-Citizens; the government forgave 140 Million Liras of Christian tax debt, lowering their demanded tax from 310 Million Liras to 170 Million. On average; Dönmeh citizens paid 2 times the amount a Muslim citizen would, a non-Citizen payed 3 times the amount a Muslim citizen would, and non-Muslim citizen paid 5 times the amount a Muslim citizen would.
At the time; people who facilitated trade in Turkey were non-Muslims, the majority of craftsmen and tradesmen were also of non-Muslim origin. The Wealth Tax aimed to tax the war-time earnings of the traders (whose majority was of non-Muslim descent) AND the large landowners (who were basically all Muslim at this point). Wealth Tax succeeded (though unfairly) in taxing the Urban traders' wealth, but utterly failed in taxing the large landowners. That is why a sister tax to the Wealth Tax was introduced: the Agricultural Produce Tax.
Poor planning and incompetent execution on the government's part lead to the Wealth Tax disaster, the sectarianism of the tax collectors and party chapter leaders (whom were elected, and were not appointed by the central party) caused the Wealth Tax disaster.
The Wealth Tax had no structural basis similar to that of the Islamic Jizya or the Kharaj, though in practice it is true that the Tax looks like the Kharaj Tax.
@@onatdeveci5502 Actually it was intended for the non muslim population because they were on average wealthier and better educated than the muslim population. Only about 3% of the Ottoman Empire could read and write at the time Kamel Ataturk turned the Ottoman Empire from an islamic caliphate/monarchy into a republic and the overwhelming majority of the 3% were made up of remnants of Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks who had survived the genocide/ethnic cleansing which the Turks carried out against them.
Turkey in the 1950s had about the same literacy levels as Holland in the 16th Century.
Awesome video my friend
What is the name of the man at 31:31 ? I can't seem to find it online because I know I'm not spelling it right and the closed captions aren't either
Sheikh Tayeb el-Oqbi/el-Okbi
Genuine question-- why do you not have a bibliography for your videos? Your videos seem very well researched it just seems like a shame to not include one
Agreed
This video provides an insightful and detailed perspective on a lesser-known chapter of WWII history-absolutely fascinating
Tbh I’m not surprised Arabs were more keen on A.H than the English or French they needed independence from them so A.H probably wanted to make Arabs his Allie’s but we all know that we would barely get anything maybe just Iraq Saudi Arabia or Oman if even we’re lucky enough to not get annexed or become a colony of turkey italy or Germany
You wouldn't have gotten Iraq or Saudi arabia either as independent non-vassal states either. If germany had been more successful, they would have seized more or less complete control of those areas too, because they desperately needed oil. Arabs would have been given nominal control over those areas and states not possessing significant oil production.
In the fullness of time, in an alternate history, he probably would have 'cleansed' the whole area and given it to the Turks or maybe whatever he considered Aryan Syrians (in the best case scenario).
@@samwise1790that’s assuming the reich doesn’t collapse on itself
@@guycrew3973 It wouldn't collapse of course.
@@genovayork2468 I’ll be honest it probably would the reich had a lot of problems they’d at least have a civil war
@@samwise1790a HIGHLY doubt they wouldve survived the desert because remember ever country who 'colonized' the felix only invaded its coasts and with semi-advanced stuff they had i high doubt it
You should do a Napoleon version of this series. I think it would be cool.
Extremely interesting video, thank you.
@susknight9410 still interesting even if propaganda
@susknight9410 "im right everyone else is wrong, everything I dislike is propaganda no matter how logical.. and everything I like is the truth no matter how illogical"
@susknight9410 oh you mean like ARA, FAL (Fee Arab Nation), NBP, PLO, Houthi, Amin al Husseini, Muhhamad Rashid Rida, Adolf Hitler, Golden Square of Iraq, PLF, Saddam Husseini, DFLP, Nuremberg
these had absolutely nothing to do with Nazis? Are you absolutely sure?
Acknowledging Hitler liked Muslims is propaganda? 😂😂😂😂
Jews and Arabs were two tribes that are closely related. Especially Palestinians and Jews have always lived in peace together in the past. It’s really sad to see how bad things are now between them. I hope they can find peace again and not be divided.
What are you Talking about?
" Jews and Arab Closely Related "?
Over 80% of Modern Jewery Are ASHKENAZI JEWS.
Ashkenazi Jews Are Jews Who Trace Their ANCESTSRY To Eastern Europe Along the Rhine River ( Germany, Poland, Lithuania etc. )
And Russia.
Then You Have Sephardic Jews ( Spain, Portugal, Morocco Algeria etc. ).
Then you have MIZRAHI JEWS who have Middle Eastern ANCESTRY ( Iraq, Iran, Yemen etc. ).
You also have The Beta Israel
Jews From Ethiopia.
THUS:
MAJORTY OF MODERN JEWS are GENETICALLY & ETHNICALLY EUROPEAN I.e ASHKENAZI JEWS.
German
Polish
Lithuanian
Hungarian
Ukrainian
Russian
Dude your channel is amazin, the subjects you cover are really interesting
BIG BROTHER
RESPECT Jabzy for this very interesting video. This explains all the troubles in the Middle East today!
No it doesn’t. Full of misinformation, no sources shown cause most of what was said is Zionist propaganda
31:41 These are the true Muslim beliefs.
The truth that pro-jewish influenced liberal propaganda from West countries tries to hide by spreading lies, and misinform people with fake news.
Why u stealing comments bro
Stealing?
Since when happened bro?
@@Hassan1007 the other guys comment was 12d old yours is 9days old. U stole it
@@zafred6424 so what's the problem? You found persons who have the same view and by the way, I didn't read his comment, it doesn't mean I stole his comment, got it?
Regarding Egypt
You failed to mention that the wafid party was the majority party and it was a nationalist party with somewhat liberal directions and although they were anti British the British trusted them to form a government as they were more anti fascism
Losers, had they sent the Egyptian army to fight alongside the British forces in Egypt and Libya, we would have had an experienced military able to defeat the jews in 1948. The defeat of Palestine led to the experienced brainlets Gamal and his boys to coup d'etat in 1952...
Jabzy, would you give an chance to in an possible future think on an Golden Circle video? On the plans of it.
Awesome video btw, always doing an awesome work.
Second that
Man you need to work on your grammar 🧐
@meshalalshamsi8080 sorry, english isn't my first leanguage
The clauses you used all make sense, its just a very strange way of making the sentence, and was missing some commas that could help.
This reminds me of Napoleon attempting to portray himself as the religious redeemer of Islam.
This comment was written as a protest to comments
My counter comment is to celebrate all other comments.
meow
@wheressteve oh no, I have been beaten 😔
@@Mtioo1 meow meow
2025-The year of Chaos
If you know anything about islam, you don't need to watch the video to know that Islam teaches never to discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity
31:40 proves this. Thats why many Muslim Scholars were HEAVY against Germany on the fact of how Facism was against Islam but also morally wrong
What about Zionism
@@mazlankaramat Zionism discriminates against anyone non Jewish on the basis of”Jewish Holy Land” Especially Arabs, Muslims and Christians alike. So radical that many Jews are strongly against Zionism, and many of which are the biggest voice for Palestinian Freedom
@@mazlankaramatzionism isn’t a race or ethnicity. What are you on about??
It doesn't teach to discriminate against races, just against christians, jews, atheists, women etc
Babe wake up, new order video dropped
IS THAT A HECKIN TNO REFERENCE?
What's new order? That sounds like an 80s band lolz
@travis8895 The New Order (TNO) is an alternate-history timeline where Germany and the Axis Powers won the Second World War
@@LargeGanny I know, right? Sounds very 80s
This video has made a lot of people show their true colors, you can read people from the discussed countries trying to defend their fascist leaders who were just as bad as Hitler.
The Middle eastern map seemed more better than than the one proposed by the french and British, since it would leave out future conflicts.
At first the promised map would see Kurdistan Created, all Arab countries to the Peninsula united under 1 Kingdom (Apart from Lebanon whom many Christians were afriad of being apart of a majority Muslim Kingdom) and potentially Israel being created. But the British and French never keep promises
And in its place, completely different conflicts would have occurred.
This misplaced overemphasis on how EU split the nations up being the “cause” of conflicts that followed is overstated, overly simplistic, and basically can only be done if you blindfold yourself. The history of that region is conflict. Always. And the power dynamics would continue to fuel new conflicts. As do the ideological differences, and the ethnic ones.
Even if you cleanly put every into nice buckets, and gave them states of their own. That wouldn’t stop the aggression. They’d just be fighting each other using different flags. There’d be more invasions instead of pogroms and civil wars. No matter how you slice it, the more powerful ones would aim to dominate the weaker ones and suppress the local population to their rule and religion.
And we’d be right back to where we are now. Where the ME has always been. And where it will continue to be long after you and I are dead and buried.
Do a video about why the Jews were kicked out of all the countries too
💀💀💀
Lets start with Algeria. At first France took Algeria and gave rights to Jews to have a loyal population who would also pay taxes, Muslims had no rights, Arabic Banned, and France hoping Algerians would become more and more French. During WW2 Muslims fought under the Free France Campaign to secure independence and France promised them and many African colonies said independence to help. After WW2 ended Algerians celebrated on the streets if Algiers securing independence before France firing on the crowd in a massacre. France denied giving Algeria independence specifically because they were seen as France proper like Corsica, they did finally give Muslim rights and unbanned Arabic (almost resulted in Arabic being forgotten) but to the Muslim Algerians they kept trying peace and they weren’t given independence so they went to a brutal Revolution to secure independence of Algeria. The Jews who got rights from the start sided with the French and helped undermine Muslim malitas in the war which caused Muslims to see the Jews as traitors and deported them to France during the war and after the war. In the 1960’s Algeria finally secured its independence
My Grandfather was one of the Moroccan Goumiers in Free France who fought against the nazi control in Northern Africa and France!
And? Fighting for those who colonized your country and you are happy.
My great grandfather fought both the French and the N🇩🇪* on their own lands LOL, he was sentenced to 20 years of prison by France but quickly escaped in a week and was never found again by France, he lived a happy life till his death and even went to France twice under a fake identity in his old days.
@@eltotierIt was because the Free France Campaign saw France acknowledge that any who helped would gain independence and if they lied about it then after WW2 France didn’t have the military capabilities to stop any revolution across its many colonies so it granted said colonies independence except for Algeria because it essential to them and it was a brutal brutal war for independence.
@@eltotier I mean, at the time, his family needed money, that’s why he became a soldier. To him the entire geopolitical side of everything wasn’t of much importance, he just wanted to help his family out financially back in Morocco.
@@eltotier He himself after the war in Europe and in Vietnam (Because was also sent to fight in the Indochina War) praised the French on a lot of things. French Colonial rule over Morocco wasn’t like that in say The Congo or Kenya. Average Moroccans didn’t feel like they were suppressed or anything, plus the French built lots of the infrastructure Morocco still uses to this day. In my Grandfathers old village, most buildings are still from the French colonial period, the schools, the bus stations, the Police Dep. Building. Of course, by saying all this I do not condone anything that resembles Modern Imperialism, I am just stating that different people had differing opinions about it at the time.
Gamal Abdelnasswr being ashamed of Egypt's army being powerlessness is extremely ironic.
Pretty sure they'd have gassed us too.
That's a proven lie the west wants to keep alive to keep supporting westerners acting like they're Semites in Palestine 😂😂😂
Nah man, some of us joined the SS... i dont get why? the wehrmact is more friendlier to us but whatever
@@deutschesmanutterMaybe thats because they start hiring 'honorary aryans' when the tide of the war didnt go well for them.
@@trevornorfolk3103 The earliest known records for such is 1941. And last i recalled, they were hella confident they were going to win against the soviets. Pretty sure germany recruited the arabs just for manpower alone.
@@trevornorfolk3103 Just like they hated all slavs but the ukrainian women were "aryan" because they are hot😂.
Really interesting. Thank you.
Thank you for this. I knew about the mufti of Jerusalem's connection with Hitler. I didn't know about all this other stuff going on in the Arab world during WW II. This shows how widespread these connections with Hitler were before Rommel lost at El Alamein. Its also good to know that not all of the Arab nations fell in line with Hitler's plans for their Jews. They knew he would simply turn on them next.
Fake news, read some real books. There are no sources for this videos claims, cause they don’t exist.
@@EndingSimple the "mufti" was a donmeh converts parading around as a muslim. Same as when they dressed as arabs planting milkchurn bombs in king david hotel then try blame egyptsame when they openly attacked uss liberty and tried to blame egypt.
Just like the donmeh Caruso brothers parading around as muslims pushing a socialist movement which brewed up the armenian genocide to ensure bauer-rothchild Baku oil enterprises pipelines were laid in Armenia.
Proxy war after proxy war after deception after lies.
Same old plays from the same tattered old play book.
Just like israeli iron dome interceptor missle hitting golan heights then becalling hezbollah did it.
1-the logistics of the missle, the ordinance of the missle, the damage left, was iron dome interceptor missle.
2- the syrian muslim druze in the golan are NOT israeli citizens, they DENOUNCE israeli citizenship and are rioting due to israeli claims of them being ANY part of israel.
Yet Hezbollah was blamed "justifying" an open attack in Beirut.
Saaaaaame ooooooold plaaaaaays
Funny because now a certain state in that region loves to emulate hitlers way of genocide
well the jews now are the ones who using hitler tactics against us
Many Muslims (not in government) who began hearing of H. Attacks in the Holocaust especially in Palestine began revolting against the British. Holding up signs and began chanting demanding the British send Jews to Palestine to save them from an Anti-Semite Europe. There were little to no Pro Germany sentiment among Muslims except in India where many Hindus and Muslims began working with the Japanese a bit to overthrow British control over India. As well as some in Indonesia who believed after the war they would be forced to be under the Netherlands again
It's a bit inconducive to elucidate theology from the political aspirations of a madman. Hitler's fanaticism ultimately stemmed from his nationalistic pride which is apparent in the "German Christian" movement to which he admitted to be. I'm not Christian myself, but his version is definitely not representative of Christian theology. Those trying to ascribe his views with that of Islam are also extremely ignorant as his actions are not reflective in any Islamic doctrine. He did express admiration for Muhammad but also Confucius and Buddha as leaders of spiritual sustenance. His seemingly affectionate tone for the people of the middle east were all but political in a strategic attempt to undermine the western colonial powers who controlled these regions, to capitalize on the (justifiably) anti-Western sentiment in these colonial territories. It's a shame that pseudo-historians today in their hatred of Muslims try to shift responsibility on Islam for no justifiable reason as his actions go against any mainstream Islamic belief. I would encourage everyone to not be so regressive in their theological debates and to let a cruel, immoral man such as Hitler to simply be what he was, a genocidal lunatic.
Well, the early Islamic Empires did help Europe break free from the savagery of the Dark Ages and paved the way towards the French Revolution - inspired by the Arab Islamic scholar Averroes (Ibn Rushd).
Just no.
There a small renaissance after the crusades were greek and roman books lost in the west were found and looted again in translated arabic.
Then after the fall of Constantinople the Christians fleeing from Islamic savagery helped Italy start the renaissance ( english is not my first language)
By the time of the French revolution the European civilization had already moved far beyond anything from the arab world.
@@RK-cj4ocunfortunately now europeans are all 🏳️🌈
And who brought the dark age to Europe? The Germans. Everything coming full circle
@@initial_kd noting I'm just saying the truth
@@islammehmeov2334 they are gay but still better than your country by long miles, that is why all muslims become refugees in europe or western countries 😭😭😂😂🤣🤣
The main goal was replacing Salam alaikum by Guten tag
Good fucking luck
A list of sources would be nice.
Isnt that hard to research the instances hes talking about…..just look it up
@@patricklawless3646it be nice to directly go to the source instead of searching for it and wasting time bro its just more convenient
whatever the plans were, it would have not been more gruesome than Israel's plans !
Pathetic. Jews have an absolute right to live in their own land. Arabs are the invading peoples, whom have appropriated the identity of Ancient Greek colonists. Bizarre.
Dumbest comment ever award.
@@dollarstorebarrontrump1141 ...said the dumbest thing ...
@@thanetitan4246 “Hitler wanted to murder the entirety of the Middle East” and you say Israel defending themselves with less than 50k deaths is worse. I think you just hate the Jude.
Idiotic comment
18:59 Ataturk was Yörük Turkmen and he was definitely a Turk.
Yeah a khazar turk 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
He was an Albanian Jew from Thessaloniki, Greece 😂😂😂
@@Zenturio62those lands belonged to Turk. His family line is very well determined. He is from Karamanoglu lines.
@@GokuResho definetely not. His phenotype is very similar to Karamanoglu line of Turks and a branch of my ancestor roamed there where he was born. He waa bozkurt, Grey Wolf. So wise and loved reading as Karamanoglu lines genetic heritage. We are blonde people, original Turks, not iranian or slav mix.
@@aslisimmm "We are blonde people, original Turks" lmfao, you are indistinguishable from Iranians, because the original Turks (who looked identical to Mongols) despised their own phenotype, so they preferred to marry out of their own race. The "Turks" you see in turkey who have light features are largely genetically Slavic. They, along with the majority of Turkish citizens, are only nominally Turkish. You can find the real Turkish phenotype in Kyrgyzstan, which is basically a Scythian-Chinese hybrid.
1:48 I just imagined a bunch of Libyans going East to help the British running into Egyptians going West to help the Axis 💀
i dont support the n*zis but many western Europeans believed in a aryan superior race or similar ideologies such as Winston Churchill. However when Germany began to take appeasements from Britain, Winston was against the British conceding. he was not against the German pro aryan views. during ww2 Britain's witnessed the out cry caused by anti- n*azis, so following the war, they decided to change their view. There are many examples of Winston Churchills views such as his view of the Bengal's in northern Indian subcontinent and his beliefs that Arabs were of the lower people in society.
What country are you from? Also A.H viewed Indians as Aryans
15:10 this newspaper?
was that an Arab news source? because not everything labed Palestine was Arab at the time, a good example being a newspaper by the name "the Palestine post" which after Israel became indapendent was renamed to "the Jerusalem post"
ok managed to check, guess it was an Arab source and not another "Palestine post" case
Yeah just like hummus or shawarma when they became an Israeli
the newspaper mentioned was called "Filastin" which is the Arabic name for Palestine
@@andy72090 a little late but thanks
You are still trying to draw lines between Atatürk and Armenians or Hitler, Atatürk himself said multiple times the Nazi Party and Hitler was nuts more so he had literally zero ties with Armenian events happening as he was in Gallapoli at the time. Stop repeating this narrative you garnered from wikipedia.
He never even mentioned tens of thousands of Jews who were saved thanks to migrating to Turkey
Again you are wrong about Refik Saydam and Nihal Atsız. Atsız was racist but pre-islam Turkic identity were already being explored for 30 years by that time and Turanist (pan-Turkic) ideas were present more than a century. Wealth tax again was not aimed towards people from any religious groups more so it impacted secular Turks which were captains of the Young Turkish Republics industry. Please correct these. Also Turkey accepted many jewish peoplez from France, especially some of the most fundamental scientific and academic developments were developed under such scientists in collaboration with Turkish ones. Taxes were a set amount for each citizen and Turkey never once organised labor camps out of prisons which is standart even now. You are misrepresenting Turkish stance. Turkey did not harbor favor or hate towards Jewish or Kurdish people during this time frame, it was strict survival of the state and the people.
They have always loved telling lies about Turks because of jealousy and fear.
Shah's refund!!! What a lie! We obliged under the condition that Iran is a naturally peaceful nation, but allies, they cowardly invaded us, and as a result, 4 million Persians died...
Great, well-researched video. Nice work.
chat GTP + fake news= great, well-researched video. Nice work. on RUclips
make one about quebec PLEASE
I would like to see a series on “what if the loser won?”, focusing on US presidential elections from 1803 to 2012 and what would happen if the losers won
Mr Beat can cover this one. He likes Presidents and their hubris
Assumes that the presidents make the decisions and not the people installing them
boring af
Lmao of course youtube deletes my reasonable response
@@volodymyrbilyk555yeah that would make more sense for him
I sometimes met youngsters in Southeast Asia who either make light of the NS and its war crimes, or outright idolizes the skinny mustache man. sometimes during their rants, I told them "If the party is still in power and they saw you, they will see you just as another person from a lesser race. You think they will make you honorary Aryan?"
This video kind of scared me. Because if there is precedent of cooperation between NS and their religion... maybe that argument won't be strong enough to deter them from being na zis... in Southeast Asia...
None of what you say is true because Hitler incorporated Asians into the third reich
There was Turkish, Pakistani, Indian, and many other Asian Waffen SS divisions
And yeah Hitler wanted to kill the Asian so bad that his greatest ally was Japan lol
If you actually read his book you would even see that he believed the Japanese and Chinese to be an actual more advanced race and culture than his own
Tell me you gobbled up all the propaganda they spoonfed you in school without telling me
as a fellow Indonesian, i know what you're talking about. Unfortunately many of our people got radicalized with this Anti-Semitic + Anti Western rhetoric to the point of extreme, all due to idiocy and fundamentalism
I had no idea the BAATH party went so far back
It’s ideological origins was both academic socialist and revivalist nationalism like in Germany. Michel Afleq saw a good model for Arabia. Unfortunately for him, most others had alternative views so that’s partly why no united Baathist Arabia occurred
So let me get this straight. The British and Jews invaded Arabia and the Arabs seek help from Germany? Got it
Literally multiple people said they would not differentiate between Jews and Muslims as they are our brothers, look at Algeria, fuck Italian controlled Libya. Today “Jews” are killing muslims who wanted them in to protect them but many true Jews are against this indiscriminate murder. We are all brothers and sisters, Jew Muslim Christian atheist Buddhist Hindu et al. Monied interests just want us fighting amongst ourselves.
ALL ARE BORN BROTHERS
a series about the expansion of the Russian empire would be very interesting!!!
Great video
Hitler would have had close ties to Iranians and Kurds as they consider themselves pure aryan.Arabs after a time would have faced a ton of problems.
Atatürk is a turkish from konya . turkey and italy is in cold war during 1925-1944 because of mussolini , atatürk disliked both hitler and musolini
Cope, he was just as bad as Hitler if not worse.
Ataturk was a hardcore nationalist, ok he wasn’t a nazi but he was still extreme in his beliefs and all you Turks today still worship him. There’s different issues there lol
@@roronoazoro2970 he is ündeed nationalist but he never see other race as lower while he tried to find full potential of turkish people , he is not facist or racist at all he knows 6 languages
@@efeaydinli25 but people usually who support him hate Arabs and Kurds and some peoples, didn’t Ataturk ban all Arabic in turkey?
@@kawa99 yeah Ataturk is our eternal leader, what are you gonna do? Cry under your bed?
the amount of backstabbing the arabs did is crazy to me, they first backstabbed the ottomans, then the britans, then the italians then the germans then themselves what a weird people man hahahahah
" the britans" 💀💀
You're literally just saying shit 😭. The Ottomans throughout the start of the 20th century pushed for an empire wide turkization campaign in order to homogenize the empire's populace to align more with the Turkish leaders. The British and French worked along side select groups of Arab leader (Sharif Hussein ibn Ali) in order to establish Arab states and take land back from the Ottomans who were actively ethnically cleaning parts of modern day Iraq, Syria, Armenia, and Lebanon. The British and French then backstabbed the Arab populace with the Sykes Picot agreement that divided up the Middle East into separate European spheres of influence. The British originally had promised the Arab leaders and their populace their goal of a Pan-Arab state. The Italians on the other hand were engaging in mass ethnic cleansing of Libya in order to create Italy's "forth shore" which was rhetorical fascist project to establish Italian colonies in North Africa and eventually annex the land. Why should the Arab people be loyal to any of these groups that essentially wanted to steal their land and genocide them?
@@YAWSSSSSS he’s not entirely wrong besides Europeans, Arabs are the second group with the most civil wars
22:00 Connecting Saydam's actions with Atsız is reaching for something that isn't there.
9:44 the tiger symbol was for the continuation of the Tipu Sultan Empire people both Nazi and INA Army. Tipu Sultan did not die he carried on to Europe and became known as Shakespeare with his stories. Any way he was involved in creating the Industrial Age where he worked with the Nazi members filed to his liking in bio data. As where he came from every one looked the same and in Europe it was quite mixed so Hitler carried out the Royal request for my Grandfather the only Emperor of the Holy Empire and only descendant of Emperor Maximilian as the British had to support as he was also the only descendant of Alfred the Great.
He was also a previous Pope of Rome known as the Innocent series. ⚡️🤴🏽🕉🔺➕
24:30 that's not the Fakir of Ipi, that's Nicholas Cage
Where do we find these quotes???
in fantasy
History books, people in power, soldier, secret documents, and documentary
Actually there are no evident Sources that hitler really said that. Only one French orientalist who can’t really say from where he got this quote, so it’s nonsense
These are made up quotes to slander the painter, watch Europa the last battle or the greatest story never told
Total arab federation? Literally every arab person dream
Absolutely not.
@@Tummamu No, I'm arab but we don't all share the same values. A gulf arab is vastly different from a levant arab, look at the difference between Dubai and Baghdad for example. A total arab federation can stay a dream.
@@Dezember_Kreuz No. Tribalism exists and is powerful
@@demtions Your answer is irrelevant. He asked whether it was the dream of every Muslim or not, and it is. What you stated is one of the challenges that needs to be vanquished for that to happen.
@@demtions u are all the same
Where a minority, they always shout about human rights.
Where a majority, there'll never be minority human rights.
It's all so tiresome
Da hooman rights are gаy tbh. They rightfully exploit our stupidity against us. You will vanish if you at the very least don't restrict these rights for the auslander
Islam is the complete and superior way of life given to us by our Creator. If that bothers you so much, cry about it now and cry again when you meet your Lord and see how stupid you were to reject His chosen religion.
Don't exhaust yourself, as you will be alone the day you leave this world (what a relief), but here's a nice proverb : "too long it is the life of the dog".
@@henocksherlock3340 as long as that's your pfp, STFU.
: Please provide primary sources.
The mufti of Jerusalem was to have parts of it. Italy was to have parts of it. Iran and Afghanistan, wooed at some point, parts of central Asia.
Strangely, Hitler deemed superfluous to support the Iraki against the British, losing a golden opportunity and led to have Vichy France lose Syria and Lebanon to the Free Frenxh.
Could you pronounce “monsieur” again for me, I need another chuckle! 😂
😂
Great documentary...
Only if he put as much effort into his pronunciations 😆
0:23 its true
No it's not haram
24:09 You are talking about Afghanistan but showing the map of Pakistan. Are you for real?
Are YOU for real?
The map doesn't show Pakistan. It shows a proposed Greater Afghanistan, which includes parts of what was then British India, which later became Western Pakistan.
Basically, the Germans wanted to appeal to the Afghans by removing the Durrand line and extending Afghanistan's borders to the Indus River. Afghanistan would gain the Pashtun-populated parts of Pakistan, but also the Karachi port in Sindh which would end Afghanistan's status as land-locked.
King abdulaziz of saudi arabia knew not to touch this conflict especially when he knew that other than the 5 million supporters he has non exists outside of the allied provinces. The war was just gonna chew through Saudi Arabia like it's nothing even if it was supported by all the allies. WW2 had 0 benefits for the house of saud and choosing sides meant loosing allies.
Growing up when we did some thing audaciously inappropriate for our lack of power as kids my mom would ask us if we were king Farooq
We had no idea there was an actual king Faruk. We never learned about this. We thought she was being silly.
0:22 He believed that Islam brought CULTURE and SCIENCE to Spain
Well, it did! Go watch the documentary "When The Moors Ruled Europe"
Many scientific inventions have been introduced to Europe.
How about the number 0, fountains, agricultural waterways, gear for surgery. All Arab inventions, boy!
Don't be so petty. Islam was in Spain flourishing for 700 years. You think we nothing happened? 😂
True but we also don't need to put down the visigoths they were amazing administrators too
@@TEDAC771 We put nobody down.
We let God decide individually.
@JoostEurovisionFans I've seen alot of people clown on the goths before them but you seem to be nicer then the other guys
0 and the numerals were invented in India, Arabs at best carried the invention to Europe
@@niranjansrinivasan4042 No they were not, 0123456789 numerals are Arabic, oldest manuscript belonging to the Moroccan Ibn al-Yasamin. The other numerals used in the middle east are Indian.
North africa is not middle east
Middle East is arab ض
North africa is amazigh ⵣ (egyptians are coptic)
You make no sense
Middle east is egypt and fertile crescent it has nothing with being arab
North africa have both arabs ,amazigh ,andulsian ,and turks and others in it
Stop ur st8pied nationalist ideas
You are arab. Look at your name.
Nope. All North African countries are Arab. The majority of the population in North Africa is Arab. Coptics, berbers and native tribes do exist and are citizens of North Africa but official the countries are ARAB. nothing you can do to change that
You're a minority & you want the people to believe you're the majority??? How that works
@@manofwar2354 No north Africa has only Arabized people it's mostly Amazigh
Bro, do you acrually create your own illustrarions in adobe illustrator? This is amazing. I juat womder how you manage to do all this.
“Ex muslim” is crazy, so now you worship ur mother cow?
@@RedBloxianshush
I would ad an Jewish stat if the
deported Jews before the holocaust was decided to be exiled/expelled there
I am sure the idea of a Greater Afghanistan would have gone swiminigly with Hitler's Indian friends.
I love how you didnt mention Hitler plan to conquer Turkey presented by Armenian ofcourse you arent gonna mention that
Can you give me the name of the process or source?
It’s crazy how the allies were like “denounce Germany” and when Iran said no they invaded them.
Maybe we weren’t the good guys lol
Hell nah we weren't the good guys but we were for sure the lesser evil by alot
Oh, you absolutely weren't.
There was never such a case of controlling the narrative of who's the bad guy than after WW2. Even WW1 paled in comparison, though it did have it's own shifts.
The entire fact by that could be said by the way you whitewashed any Soviet crime done in Eastern Europe in the favor of "an alliance", even though most of Eastern Europe saw the Soviets as the bigger evil for a REASON, even the previously friendly government of Romania.
@@RazorsharpLT"most of Eastern Europe" talk about controlling a narrative.
@@RazorsharpLTMost of Eastern Europe believed the Soviet Union to be the greater evil until they lived over N*zi occupation. You’re clowning if you think N*zi Germany was morally grey whatsoever.
@@AFGuidesHD😂😂 ignorant fool. What about former Yugoslavia, Hungary, Ukraine, Poland and that whole area😂😂❤
This is interesting, I will subscribe.
Heaven on earth. We all know how the free worlds Middle East turned out to be
hitler is racist even when he even praises💀
jewish projection
Someone should have told him that 'aryan' means 'iran' in farsi.
Hitler was in good relations with Iran in WW2, he recognised them as aryans, which they were.
someone should have told you scholars used the term Aryan to identify the Indo-European or Indo-Germanic peoples who settled throughout India, Persia (Iran), and Europe thousands of years earlier.
The term "Aryan" was originally used as an ethnocultural self-designative identity and epithet of "noble" by Indo-Iranians and the authors of the oldest known religious texts of Rig Veda and Avesta within the Indo-Iranian branch of Indo-European language family-Sanskrit and Iranian, who lived in ancient India and Iran.
@@yunglockjaw3815what's Indo-Germanic lmao!?
List your sources to be taken seriously
I want to know how the Arabs tell their point of view about any information from these meaningless and ineffective figures, and no one talked about Hitler or Napoleon or any movement or even the history of European civilization is not important or there is something that connects the Arabs and Western Europe or even Eastern Europe, and I do not believe that there is a relationship between the Arab Islamic countries in the days of the Caliphate, which has nothing to do with it, and there is nothing to mention about whether there was a country that stopped the Islamic conquests or the expansion of the Islamic world, as this is a mistake in some countries that say that we were able to make the Caliphate be defeated or stop, as there are different ideas in the foundation. There was no people from any European country or others who made it impossible for Muslims to control Europe or other countries in the world, but the reason is that the Arab Muslims were the ones who had problems with this area that became larger, which will cause major problems, but this area was controlled, and the reason that made the Muslims stop the Islamic conquests is the fatigue of travel, and no one can benefit from making Europe part of the Islamic Caliphate Which became richer than they were before and which made them in a state of self-sufficiency and there is another reason if the topic is about Europe and the Islamic Caliphate which was stronger than everyone in one view you will understand that Europe does not have anything worthy because no one knows who they are only the Arabs know about an empire or a name that was famous among the Arabs and Muslims and they are the Romans which has a deep history and a famous name and the evidence for this talk is the example of the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabs in the past called it the Roman Sea
The Ottomans spent hundreds of years trying to conquer Europe, it is not as if they were not interested it is just from the 1600s and onward the European nations were vastly superior. It is not like the Islamic conquest stopped because a lack of interest, they simply could not compete with the Europeans anymore after the golden days of the Ottoman Empire came to an end. The reason why the European powers colonized Africa and Middle East is because it was basically free land, they were so far ahead they could take it easily. If the roles were reversed the Islamic nations would have done the same to Europe if they could.
you forgot one point Arabs are an ethnic group of tribes whose grandfather is Ismail. The problem is in the media, and even politicians and the people of North Arabia and North Africa claim to be Arabs, and this is not true.
Fascism and National Socialism are not the same thing. Stop using the words interchangeably and it’ll make more sense to you why certain groups during the war would side with fascists and not nazis or nazis and not fascists.
Rectangles and squares. Sure some groups and people were pro fascism but anti Nazi, but some people were anti Nazi because they were anti Fascism.
I expected more information about Iran-germany relations. You focused more on north Africa and Arabs while the Persians were considered pure Aryans by the nazi regime.
Lol, what a myth. To the Na"zis, you were just Aryan hybrids. You are definitely not pure Aryans, To them, pure Aryans were only the Nordics.
@@yassineanassine7905which is weird because the people from the actual caucasus are sometimes darker toned in skin than Europeans, dark hair, dark beards, usually Muslim in faith. Yet the groups belonging to other parts of Europe whose blood is actually way more mixed is thought of as more aryan or white lol
@yassineanassine7905 Myth? Just look at the Nuremberg laws. Iranians were considered pure aryans by their standards don't get butthurt over historical facts
As a nationalist I have good reasons to oppose nazism and islam altogether. Thanks for proving me right. The only good scenario for Europe would have been no world wars at all. We lost our best people for interest of non-Europeans and got nothing out of it.
Why oppose national socialism?
Based
@@Centurio_1 I reject all the warmongering which only got more Europeans killed. Furthermore it digusts me that they were friendly with turks,arabs and other non-Europeans while disrespecting Italians,Slavs and Greeks. Their hostility towards some European cultures rivals modern day woke leftists.
@@Centurio_1 because its genocidal and kills millions of innocent people
Iran is Aryan
It's the same with Japanese being view as liberator by the Indonesian.
They just hated their colonial overlords. It was basically just 2 bad options but Muslim Scholars knew that the Germany 1 was worse and went against Islam and was morally wrong so sided with the British reluctantly
What about the Caucasus? You did mention Azerbaijan briefly but what about Georgia and Armenia? As I understand, thenazis were split about what Turks did to Armenians between 1915-1920, so it's interesting how they would handle that situation. It's also interesting what would their plan be for Georgia because on one hand it's Stalin's nation, and they wanted to control it, but on the other hand Georgia is the ethnicity which the philosophy of Blumenbach is based on, and Blumenbach was one of the main inspirations of their party's ideology, and he did claim that all "whites" come from Caucasus, and specifically Georgia (which was proven in 2006, and it's crazy Blumenbach got that right simple based on observation). But he also claimed that the Georgians are literally the pinnacle of "white beauty", which is ironic considering Georgians look nothing like Germans, they look much more similar to Greeks and south Italians, maybe even Lebanese and Syrian.
There are many Georgians who are as white as ghosts; I have never seen this skin shade in many Europeans, to be honest with you. They have a lot of blondes and redheads, and their facial structure is distinctly 'white.' Of course, there is variation in their skin shade between individuals, but on average, they are mostly white. The same goes for Italians and Greeks.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart that you made this video. It shows how muslims truly supported the jews. Such a shame what Israel have done since. What a way to thank us.
How the hell is that your takeaway? It’s the opposite.
@@aaronrodgers77 We don’t have any issue with Jews besides the conflict in Israel. Most european countries have had an issue with them and that’s why Germany did what they did in the first place because the other countries wouldn’t take them and because anti-semestism was huge in europe. Muslims didn’t create consentration camps and gass them to death. You can’t rewrite history and blame us for something YOU did. No matter how hard you try. History is history, If the Jews were tanken care of and respected in europe and around the world. Israel wouldn’t have excisted in the first place. It excist, because they were noe safe among you. So next time. Kindly stfu.
What you've got wrong is that so called Armenian "Genocide" was between 1915-1918
no? it was 1915-23, literally google it lmao
@@shudson-o1u That is your problem. You just Google and find the first answer to you question true. Digital literacy of you is not so high. How would a genocide occure while the subjects of it is not even there and already sent to Syria. How would a genocide occure when there is not even a central government. Its extension to 1923 is just to make people think Ankara Government is bad. Because there was no longer an Ottoman Empire to blame for so they chose thier new victem as Ankara Government and Turkey.
@@melonking9752why deny genocide? Actually disgusting behavior.
@@melonking9752 typical turk denying genocide.
They would have stolen all bycycles before making everybody wear lederhosen
what map did you use
Exactly what I was thinking 😂