On the Cooler Master RTX50 series coolers, I think you failed to mention that the thickness of the cooler can be adjusted by the fans you use on the cooler, and also that any companies fans can be used. This is even demonstrated in the photos.
Man sorry but you don't know what you 're talking about. The scores are not conflicting at all. 3d mark speedway measures rt performance and time spy only raster performance. 2 different things. So expect (if rumors true) about 4080 super in raster and about 4070 ti super performance in rt. If you gonna talk tech, make sure you know tech.
If you look at the price of the 9070, you know its performance. Also, looking at performance per Watt makes much more sense than just solely looking at the performance. I guess in this regard, the 7090 comes close to the 4090 in terms of Ray Tracing (maybe still 15%-20% less efficient) and is nearly the same in pure rasterization (maybe around 2% less efficient).
Plottwist, AMD is doing what they have done in the past:rebranding new GPUs and these are in reality 7900xt/xtx chips. I know this is BS, because of RDNA4 etc. But at this point they might as well.
Meh, might as well do it, they don't have much to lose, trying to aim more at the mid range the real adversary is only intel so, if they can improve there, might as well use older chips with new things on it idk
924 - where is your proof that the 9070/XT are just rebranded 7900XT/X chips?. According to MLID, coreteks, RGT, etc, RDNA4 is a new architecture. It's actually a failed MCM architecture as AMD couldn't get the multi chips to work as one. Hence no high end models for RDNA4. So RDNA4 was salvaged as monolithic dies. We will see Radeon MCM with the next architecture called UDNA (unified DNA).
On the Cooler Master RTX50 series coolers, I think you failed to mention that the thickness of the cooler can be adjusted by the fans you use on the cooler, and also that any companies fans can be used. This is even demonstrated in the photos.
Oh yeah, forgot to mention that, thank you
Man sorry but you don't know what you 're talking about. The scores are not conflicting at all. 3d mark speedway measures rt performance and time spy only raster performance. 2 different things. So expect (if rumors true) about 4080 super in raster and about 4070 ti super performance in rt. If you gonna talk tech, make sure you know tech.
What a weenie
Speed way is a Ray tracing test, which is why Nvidia cards perform better there.
If you look at the price of the 9070, you know its performance. Also, looking at performance per Watt makes much more sense than just solely looking at the performance. I guess in this regard, the 7090 comes close to the 4090 in terms of Ray Tracing (maybe still 15%-20% less efficient) and is nearly the same in pure rasterization (maybe around 2% less efficient).
So new mid range king is 9070xt
Plottwist, AMD is doing what they have done in the past:rebranding new GPUs and these are in reality 7900xt/xtx chips. I know this is BS, because of RDNA4 etc. But at this point they might as well.
Meh, might as well do it, they don't have much to lose, trying to aim more at the mid range the real adversary is only intel so, if they can improve there, might as well use older chips with new things on it idk
924 - where is your proof that the 9070/XT are just rebranded 7900XT/X chips?.
According to MLID, coreteks, RGT, etc, RDNA4 is a new architecture. It's actually a failed MCM architecture as AMD couldn't get the multi chips to work as one. Hence no high end models for RDNA4. So RDNA4 was salvaged as monolithic dies. We will see Radeon MCM with the next architecture called UDNA (unified DNA).