Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
The example used above is the most complex and simple simultaneously, meaning all parameters are constantly on at being varied and in equilibrium, (with the infinitely small and infinitely big simultaneous directional movement assumed). Another example which in appearance looks simply, yet it is that which makes it highly complex is this....Such an example is, and can be considered a positive flow leaning interaction, the reverse to that is a negative flow leaning interaction. There are an extremely high number of combinatorial possibilities only with and within three physical bodies, with bearing in mind, these interaction points are simultaneously as in a precise manner in regards to the middle path, elongated to a three point interaction of the actual orbital paths of each physical body.There are two more internal orbital paths not included in order to keep a clarity of description, being either a positive or negative one, which is why the external orbital path is more appt to give a understandable view.Three examples in the world would give some very useful results in this regard, two of such are of and by an ant colony in nature, a beehive in nature, and the third is the Sahara desert. With the animal cases, if and when it would be possible to observe for a long uninterrupted period the whole area a ant colony, or a beehive covers, the varied yet highly with the highly part more on the side of extremely stable equilibrium, would be very observable. The third example, one regarding the Sahara desert, is connected more to wether patterns, more precisely the average humidity level of the desert, the dust particle movement which establishes the humidity level, and the humidity level with and within all around it's edges, meaning the sea, all the way to equatorial jungle as a gradual land incursion, in addition of the positive flow and negative flow of the temperature average of and by each corresponding point.The Sahara desert is chosen because it would manifest clearer and higher resolution information and data, one could apply the same method to Siberian platou regarding spring, summer, autumn, or a dense equatorial jungle large enough not to be chaotic, and only after that to a Siberian platou during the coldest period in terms of temperature, which would include in terms of reference points all the way to Portugal, Norway, Turkey, the gulf including South Iran, South Asia, South Korea and Japan, in fact considering the system is varied and in equilibrium, the coldest period in terms of temperature goes right through (meaning including) the North Pole, spaning the whole of North America, all the way to Mexico, including all of the Southern coast right up to the Caribbean islands.© Miri 14 October 2024
See higher spin statistics theorem for invertible quantum field theories... For the rest
As to the why such a system operates in this manner is not fully clear, meaning I have not put forward a much clearer understanding letter by letter, word by word, paragraph by paragraph, although throughout the writing it is very clear. What I have pointed out is the term and the meaning straight through the middle.In order to understand such a presupposition, the Galileo'en statement of..... (If and when an object is moving downwards with no obstacles, it can do so through infinity) should be seen in a magnetic field term, and consequentially gravity field term.Assuming point (a) is the instance and the object simultaneously, where a movement downwards with no obstacles all the way to point (b) as an instance and object can be initiated, developed, maintained and enacted.....Then it can only do so, if and when point (a) as an instance and object is the repellent part of a magnetic field, and point (b) as an instance and object is the attracting part of a magnetic field. (Then it can only do so) refers to the actual existence, meaning the entire physical universe, meaning otherwise it is impossible. The powerful part of such a view regards the fact, once object (a) being a point and instance moves, it's initial start maintains the same physical characteristics, which revert in being a gravitational field simultaneously, one which switches from attraction to repelling regarding the distance, object, instance, density and so on.....This means the presupposition of right through the middle, means exactly and precisely that, it is the only way anyone can understand science in the first place.Behind this, (meaning a direct straight line right through the middle) lies something extremely and fundamentally amazing in regards to existence, which I understand it as a common analogy referred to, by and of ( leaving a trace of bread crumbs.)Leaving a trace of bread crumbs literally means existence, with and within whichever form, already exists, meaning it is not possible to leave a trace of bread crumbs unless it is possible.There are two fundamental implications that interest me in using as an explanation. One regards to cells, and ADN mutation, and the other regards to a fundamental change of the earth wether system, meaning, temperature, density, life, form, matter, and so on, which are highly interlinked, yet not appearing so.Cells in terms of ADN mutation, which means evolution, regarding health and disease fallow always this method. It is fascinating because the level and degree of a (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) is so subtle, that in most cases almost all of the cells will not fallow it's pattern, and in most cases the level and degree is so strong that almost all of the cells will fallow it's pattern, including equally in reverse . Both instances can refer to a survival structure, with the caveat of and by one being healthy and the other being cancerogenous on equal terms for example. The same method is applicable to any health condition or disease. Meaning the pattern is, it is so precise that it only requires a straight line through the middle, and literally without no prior or sudden information and data regarding it. Which is a fundamental mutation.The examples of ants, bee's and a vast area such as a dessert I have pointed out follows this method, and it goes without saying the very physical existence fallows this method.What is very important regarding the analogy of and by (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) regards to a very important fact, which is ......Upon the detection or not of such possible instances in being a whole combinatorial set, (as if new), of possible combinations in regards to infinitly big and infinitely small is available or not, (often completely unrelated and drastically different to the very instance) giving rise to what is referred as mutation or evolution, one which is random, independent and free willing, which consequentially becomes itself into a (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) either very present or completely invisible.This is important in terms of a global weather system. Simply because upon the conditions for the system to come into partial or full contact with and within such levels and degrees of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs), the system will proceed or not, meaning a drastic change will occur or not, once it does or not, the infinite combinatorial set regarding it, is equal to the period the system operates as such, with and within all of it's level and degrees of being. In Earth terms means it's entire period of and by existence as earth.In life terms it is equally important, considering the structure combinations in existence, having existed, then upon a partial or full contact with and within such levels and degrees of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs), life will mutate having a infinity possibility of combinatorial matches to the existing global system, and that means as a alien as it can possibly get.To me this is not as scary as presented or appearing, simply because regarding a possible (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) a human system is pretty top notch regarding such combinations, what is important is the level and degree of independence understanding in regards to all what is in favor or against.In terms of a varied yet highly with the highly part more on the side of extremely stable equilibrium system, once let's say in a infinitely small scale of 1 (being the system is a 1,2,3) as pattern is, the 3, and 2 part is also at the fundamental of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs instance) even if and when the physical observation shows different as it would or not, being 2 is not one, and 3 is not either, and in being all three parts individually and combined are simultaneously infinitely big and small, an absolute no correlation there needs to be, except in terms of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs).Which is why positions such as energy, frequency and spectrum amongst many other are there for and by the usage of knowing such instances, most importantly for and by initiating, developing, maintaining and constantly enacting such instances.© Miri 14 October 2024
The example used above is the most complex and simple simultaneously, meaning all parameters are constantly on at being varied and in equilibrium, (with the infinitely small and infinitely big simultaneous directional movement assumed). Another example which in appearance looks simply, yet it is that which makes it highly complex is this....
Such an example is, and can be considered a positive flow leaning interaction, the reverse to that is a negative flow leaning interaction. There are an extremely high number of combinatorial possibilities only with and within three physical bodies, with bearing in mind, these interaction points are simultaneously as in a precise manner in regards to the middle path, elongated to a three point interaction of the actual orbital paths of each physical body.
There are two more internal orbital paths not included in order to keep a clarity of description, being either a positive or negative one, which is why the external orbital path is more appt to give a understandable view.
Three examples in the world would give some very useful results in this regard, two of such are of and by an ant colony in nature, a beehive in nature, and the third is the Sahara desert. With the animal cases, if and when it would be possible to observe for a long uninterrupted period the whole area a ant colony, or a beehive covers, the varied yet highly with the highly part more on the side of extremely stable equilibrium, would be very observable. The third example, one regarding the Sahara desert, is connected more to wether patterns, more precisely the average humidity level of the desert, the dust particle movement which establishes the humidity level, and the humidity level with and within all around it's edges, meaning the sea, all the way to equatorial jungle as a gradual land incursion, in addition of the positive flow and negative flow of the temperature average of and by each corresponding point.
The Sahara desert is chosen because it would manifest clearer and higher resolution information and data, one could apply the same method to Siberian platou regarding spring, summer, autumn, or a dense equatorial jungle large enough not to be chaotic, and only after that to a Siberian platou during the coldest period in terms of temperature, which would include in terms of reference points all the way to Portugal, Norway, Turkey, the gulf including South Iran, South Asia, South Korea and Japan, in fact considering the system is varied and in equilibrium, the coldest period in terms of temperature goes right through (meaning including) the North Pole, spaning the whole of North America, all the way to Mexico, including all of the Southern coast right up to the Caribbean islands.
© Miri
14 October 2024
See higher spin statistics theorem for invertible quantum field theories...
For the rest
As to the why such a system operates in this manner is not fully clear, meaning I have not put forward a much clearer understanding letter by letter, word by word, paragraph by paragraph, although throughout the writing it is very clear. What I have pointed out is the term and the meaning straight through the middle.
In order to understand such a presupposition, the Galileo'en statement of..... (If and when an object is moving downwards with no obstacles, it can do so through infinity) should be seen in a magnetic field term, and consequentially gravity field term.
Assuming point (a) is the instance and the object simultaneously, where a movement downwards with no obstacles all the way to point (b) as an instance and object can be initiated, developed, maintained and enacted.....
Then it can only do so, if and when point (a) as an instance and object is the repellent part of a magnetic field, and point (b) as an instance and object is the attracting part of a magnetic field. (Then it can only do so) refers to the actual existence, meaning the entire physical universe, meaning otherwise it is impossible. The powerful part of such a view regards the fact, once object (a) being a point and instance moves, it's initial start maintains the same physical characteristics, which revert in being a gravitational field simultaneously, one which switches from attraction to repelling regarding the distance, object, instance, density and so on.....
This means the presupposition of right through the middle, means exactly and precisely that, it is the only way anyone can understand science in the first place.
Behind this, (meaning a direct straight line right through the middle) lies something extremely and fundamentally amazing in regards to existence, which I understand it as a common analogy referred to, by and of ( leaving a trace of bread crumbs.)
Leaving a trace of bread crumbs literally means existence, with and within whichever form, already exists, meaning it is not possible to leave a trace of bread crumbs unless it is possible.
There are two fundamental implications that interest me in using as an explanation. One regards to cells, and ADN mutation, and the other regards to a fundamental change of the earth wether system, meaning, temperature, density, life, form, matter, and so on, which are highly interlinked, yet not appearing so.
Cells in terms of ADN mutation, which means evolution, regarding health and disease fallow always this method. It is fascinating because the level and degree of a (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) is so subtle, that in most cases almost all of the cells will not fallow it's pattern, and in most cases the level and degree is so strong that almost all of the cells will fallow it's pattern, including equally in reverse . Both instances can refer to a survival structure, with the caveat of and by one being healthy and the other being cancerogenous on equal terms for example. The same method is applicable to any health condition or disease. Meaning the pattern is, it is so precise that it only requires a straight line through the middle, and literally without no prior or sudden information and data regarding it. Which is a fundamental mutation.
The examples of ants, bee's and a vast area such as a dessert I have pointed out follows this method, and it goes without saying the very physical existence fallows this method.
What is very important regarding the analogy of and by (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) regards to a very important fact, which is ......
Upon the detection or not of such possible instances in being a whole combinatorial set, (as if new), of possible combinations in regards to infinitly big and infinitely small is available or not, (often completely unrelated and drastically different to the very instance) giving rise to what is referred as mutation or evolution, one which is random, independent and free willing, which consequentially becomes itself into a (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) either very present or completely invisible.
This is important in terms of a global weather system. Simply because upon the conditions for the system to come into partial or full contact with and within such levels and degrees of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs), the system will proceed or not, meaning a drastic change will occur or not, once it does or not, the infinite combinatorial set regarding it, is equal to the period the system operates as such, with and within all of it's level and degrees of being. In Earth terms means it's entire period of and by existence as earth.
In life terms it is equally important, considering the structure combinations in existence, having existed, then upon a partial or full contact with and within such levels and degrees of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs), life will mutate having a infinity possibility of combinatorial matches to the existing global system, and that means as a alien as it can possibly get.
To me this is not as scary as presented or appearing, simply because regarding a possible (leaving a trace of bread crumbs) a human system is pretty top notch regarding such combinations, what is important is the level and degree of independence understanding in regards to all what is in favor or against.
In terms of a varied yet highly with the highly part more on the side of extremely stable equilibrium system, once let's say in a infinitely small scale of 1 (being the system is a 1,2,3) as pattern is, the 3, and 2 part is also at the fundamental of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs instance) even if and when the physical observation shows different as it would or not, being 2 is not one, and 3 is not either, and in being all three parts individually and combined are simultaneously infinitely big and small, an absolute no correlation there needs to be, except in terms of (leaving a trace of bread crumbs).
Which is why positions such as energy, frequency and spectrum amongst many other are there for and by the usage of knowing such instances, most importantly for and by initiating, developing, maintaining and constantly enacting such instances.
© Miri
14 October 2024