"It has to be at different places at the same time in order for things to stick. That is what quantum physics is all about" That just blew my mind. What does it mean?
All it means is that the law of physics have to be the same wherever you look, and wherever you look a lot of stuff has to be there. It's difficult to have self-consistency if there is little to work with. And the quote was "things have to be in more places at the same time in order for things to stick."
Great stuff. A creative source, force, or whatever one would wish to call it, would have to be devoid of any "choice" - otherwise it would simply self-contradict (less than perfect).
"We are in contradiction, for instance, when we want to go somewhere else and yet we want to stay here. In that state, choice exists; and so, as long as choice exists, there must be conflict. Choice exists because you are confused. There is no choice when you see a thing clearly. Contradiction is when I do not see clearly, when choice comes into action. When I see clearly what I want to do, there is no choice and no contradiction." -Krishnamurti
All of the high strangeness in science is coming from uncertainty. Science is in the business of explaining things and this uncertainty is getting in the way. Matter has a material quality that emerges out of the information field. Information has a spiritual quality with variation emerging from the singularity. This variation is the echos of creation and there is no way back to the place where it came from. Truth is the central core of reality and while men consider themselves capable of discerning truth, it becomes apparent that we are only given a glimpse to some degree of resolution beyond which subjective reasoning always intrudes.
Okay with glue. But those huge magnetic forces which hold everything together where have they come from.?are there any quantum generators there to be the origin of everything?
Was dark matter present from cosmic inflation expansion of tiny point universe? Is dark matter the expansion of something inside the tiny point universe?
Was a quantum wave generated from cosmic inflation expansion of tiny point universe? If so, did this quantum wave form quantum gravity particles? Would a quantum wave generated from tiny point universe with matter in it have information about that matter that could form quantum gravity particles?
No, he doesn't ! He doesn't understand the question at all :) Most people don't. It's no use for them. All math is really about is just proportions between something that exists. If something exist let's call it 1. From that 1 you can do 1+1 and generate all else , all operations, laws and math. Math is tool to see what's possible. The Question comes before math. Math can't even be applied. All the more physics. This Question is really about concept of time. Without time there is nothing to exist or not exist. There is no math because there's no operations. He clearly doesn't go this route and doesn't understand.
First off there is no time variable because all our observations tie it to space, they are interchangable and the same. Second off, the concept of nothing the guy talks about is just a concept, we have NO proof of it even existing. Let me repeat the nothing the guy speaks about is just a concept philosophers have which we have no empiric evidence of. As far as we know there isnt even possibility of a "space" where there is no laws of physics, forces, particles etc.
Yeah it is a purely philsophical question, & the question is this: Why is there anything at all? Spacetime is something. Even if it were devoid of any other laws of physics, it would be something and it would have properties (like Euclidean geometry). The idea of having proof that something like Nothing exists is just a confused expression.
It's two questions actually. One is problem is nonexistence within space-time, and the second nonexistence outside space-time. The first one is completely real and empiric. You didn't existed for billions of years. Now you exist. This is possible talk about and explain using physics. The second case is much harder to talk about I agree.
I mean logically speaking does it makes sense for something to be non-existing.If there was something non-existing with nothing on it, then, nothing can make mesuarements of itself ,i dont know if you can get it but i will make an example , if anything in the universe were only materialistic and nothing could evolve to that state of acquiring knowledge of itself then the existence of the universe itself would have been absent. So the real question is does exist a non-existing universe where no information can be acquired by nothing . I think yes but there is no way of detecting it bcs its non-existing so cannot interfere with the existing part of it (so otherwise would have beenn existing). Now the real real question is why have to be that existence and non existence can form? Maybe because there are only theese possibilities for something to be.
Is dark matter quantum gravity? Dark matter acts like gravity on the galaxy and also is transparent / does not interact with ordinary matter such as light and heat?
a good theory should be able to predict how much change there is in your pocket, the colour of the pants of that pocket and you being asleep or not at once... i say this cause of course a theory will not ever be able to do this, but the thought shows the limits of what we could express in mathematical rules and physical observations.. if you follow the perspective of, we need a place for stuff to happen, plus stuff itself plus time for it to happen in and leave it that, you define an ontological prison that will never include change in your pocket, evolution, heartbreak, youtube or consciousness itself. The order of logic in this perspective is highly influenced by a cultural perspective/paradigm that “we live in a a place in a time where things have always been the way they are... well except for the Big Bang and before that but let’s leave that out” i am a great supporter of turning things around: no law of physics, in it’s own terms exists outside of a human mind, attributing meaning to symbols that reflect rules that have been distilled from logic and experimental observations. It’s a necessary choice for us to make that they are laws, but they have no fundament older than some century or so, and remain stuck at the level of concensus and choice. So, for me to turn things around, nothing would exist without consciousness, being able to through the human interface observe and interact with a reality that without no logic can be separated from itself. Consciousness should be the starting point of any theory that describes anything at all, and basically, i feel that once we make this paradigm shift, everything will fall into place and we can actually know what’s what and where in which colour at any given time - for we ourselves our consciousness decides every aspect of the present moment
The universe and all it's 'laws' must be a physical as well as a mental tautology both consistent and complete in order to explain both matter and mind and which is mathematics itself. Nothing else is capable of both period.
Kaku is a brilliant guy. Maybe God really didn't have a choice and we cannot disprove it unless someone runs a universe sized computer simulation with different physical laws and physical constants.
I love science fiction! The Earth is YHVH'S and the fullness there of. It is on foundations and can not be moved. It has a solid firmament above and the luminaries are close as are the sun and the moon. Sun and moon approx. 30 Miles across. Moon slightly closer and both approx. 3000 miles above us when directly overhead. Water is flat as far as you can see. Columbus never sailed over a curved surface because it doesn't exist.
There is no equation that can solve the fact that our Creator has used computing technology similar to the voice recognition/search engine technology that he had his characters build to speak his simulation program into existence. We are nothing but characters who come alive in a simulation as it's being played out according to very well planned thoughts.
John Angelov God has used psychedelic drugs to establish some of his chosen believers. I have met many believers who came to believe that there has to be a Creator while they were using these types of drugs.
As cosmic inflation expand tiny point universe, quantum wave generated forms quantum gravity particles / dark matter that gradually reduces inflation to hubble cosmological constant expansion of dark energy?
He's trying to address the most basic questions. And yet there's not a single new twist, he's just repeating what he has learned. Listen to it again if you don't believe me:)
Gosh, Kaku is such an amicable guy that it's so hard to disagree with him. He's the kind of guy I wish lived next door, that I could invite over for a beer. But, regarding his ideas, he's a priori a scientific materialist who gives no reason for why he assumes this worldview to be more plausibly true than say any version of poly-theism, animism or classical theism. So I approach his comments with great hesitation and skepticism.
Michio describes the exact same thing, but in a scientific way. Poly theism is just god divided in multiple aspects, animism is pretty much the same concept and classical theism is the same except god is described as a metaphysical being. You have to realise that, even though there is a lot of delusion surrounding religion, it does actually describe how reality works. I see it as metaphysical science. Religions tried to translate this "metaphysical science" into words, but that's hard to do obviously. They all have their own descriptions, but it is ultimately the exact same thing.
I have my own made 'Law Of Possibilities' (according to which everything is possible) written in an unpublished scientific paper of my own. Tell me if anyone wants it, I can send it to him/her.
Patrick Longhi himself, herself, it, they, them., up, down. it’s why I put it in “ “ just in case people genuinely believed that God was a “he” I was pointing out how wrong you are.
In a thought experiment I read in God's debris - big bang itself is an attempt of God committing suicide. The reason to figure out the answer the only philosophical question- " suicide". The motivation is due to an assertion that " an omnipotent, omnipresent being a.k.a God, will not have an answer to only one question- what would happen if God seize to exist?"
You want nature of reality,play some jerry goldsmith star trek opening theme soundtrack,that is perfect creation not bullshit boring mathematics theories
He isn't really saying anything. Why is there something rather than nothing? Maybe there was always something. Maybe "nothing" is absurd, and not a part of reality.
+nadoeloiskat I can't stress on unseen assumptions but let's assume your approach to understanding deeper underlying meaning has atleast some validation, but what gives you the right to proclaim god, Jesus, deity would have any interest in convincing +Anthony pirtle otherwise?
***** I didn't mean it to sound like accountability is on you. Rather why would you assume on loose principles of someone in the magnitude of a deity?
***** in other words you would be in contradiction if you chose to think a deity had given choices and people couldnt delve into that. What comes as the consequence is maybe another chapter.
Dr. Kaku is my least favorite "science" personality. He plays it very safe and only comments on things that are reasonably obvious to this audience to begin with.
Yea, but Michio actually went to the best university in the world and influenced quantum physics more than any other physicist in this age... Yet Neil is just a science educator.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
I love this stuff. Michio is cool.
Nice try Michio 😉
Best video I ever watched must watch to understand reality!!!!!!!
"It has to be at different places at the same time in order for things to stick. That is what quantum physics is all about" That just blew my mind. What does it mean?
Even i jumped into comment section just after this line to understand it. Seems like nobody bothered to answer it in a whole year.
I suspect it has to do with quantum entanglement, a very bizarre term itself. And that is a far as I can go, as I am a pharmacist :)
All it means is that the law of physics have to be the same wherever you look, and wherever you look a lot of stuff has to be there. It's difficult to have self-consistency if there is little to work with. And the quote was "things have to be in more places at the same time in order for things to stick."
It would be AWESOME if you interviewed Robert Lanza.
That guy, he talk bizarre his book was bizarre nothing made sense
Where do i get that sheet of paper ....
Great stuff. A creative source, force, or whatever one would wish to call it, would have to be devoid of any "choice" - otherwise it would simply self-contradict (less than perfect).
"We are in contradiction, for instance, when we want to go somewhere else and yet we want to stay here. In that state, choice exists; and so, as long as choice exists, there must be conflict.
Choice exists because you are confused. There is no choice when you see a thing clearly. Contradiction is when I do not see clearly, when choice comes into action. When I see clearly what I want to do, there is no choice and no contradiction." -Krishnamurti
+endar117 - Being a hard-determinist, I would not disagree.
Awesome dude
Does the quantum field bring time dimensions of past, present and future in space?
What is relationship of quantum field to mathematics?
Is quantum field a fundamental component of multiverse?
Does the action of gravity in quantum field bring about space?
All of the high strangeness in science is coming from uncertainty.
Science is in the business of explaining things and this uncertainty is
getting in the way. Matter has a material quality that emerges out of
the information field. Information has a spiritual quality with
variation emerging from the singularity. This variation is the echos of
creation and there is no way back to the place where it came from. Truth
is the central core of reality and while men consider themselves
capable of discerning truth, it becomes apparent that we are only given a
glimpse to some degree of resolution beyond which subjective reasoning
always intrudes.
What happens to the flame when the fire no longer feeds it?
e=mc2 energy and matter both manifest the same thing. what is this thing?
Okay with glue. But those huge magnetic forces which hold everything together where have they come from.?are there any quantum generators there to be the origin of everything?
Was dark matter present from cosmic inflation expansion of tiny point universe? Is dark matter the expansion of something inside the tiny point universe?
Was a quantum wave generated from cosmic inflation expansion of tiny point universe? If so, did this quantum wave form quantum gravity particles? Would a quantum wave generated from tiny point universe with matter in it have information about that matter that could form quantum gravity particles?
so did Kaku just not get the question
No, he doesn't ! He doesn't understand the question at all :) Most people don't. It's no use for them. All math is really about is just proportions between something that exists. If something exist let's call it 1. From that 1 you can do 1+1 and generate all else , all operations, laws and math. Math is tool to see what's possible. The Question comes before math. Math can't even be applied. All the more physics.
This Question is really about concept of time. Without time there is nothing to exist or not exist. There is no math because there's no operations. He clearly doesn't go this route and doesn't understand.
First off there is no time variable because all our observations tie it to space, they are interchangable and the same. Second off, the concept of nothing the guy talks about is just a concept, we have NO proof of it even existing. Let me repeat the nothing the guy speaks about is just a concept philosophers have which we have no empiric evidence of. As far as we know there isnt even possibility of a "space" where there is no laws of physics, forces, particles etc.
Yeah it is a purely philsophical question, & the question is this: Why is there anything at all? Spacetime is something. Even if it were devoid of any other laws of physics, it would be something and it would have properties (like Euclidean geometry).
The idea of having proof that something like Nothing exists is just a confused expression.
It's two questions actually. One is problem is nonexistence within space-time, and the second nonexistence outside space-time. The first one is completely real and empiric. You didn't existed for billions of years. Now you exist. This is possible talk about and explain using physics. The second case is much harder to talk about I agree.
I mean logically speaking does it makes sense for something to be non-existing.If there was something non-existing with nothing on it, then, nothing can make mesuarements of itself ,i dont know if you can get it but i will make an example , if anything in the universe were only materialistic and nothing could evolve to that state of acquiring knowledge of itself then the existence of the universe itself would have been absent. So the real question is does exist a non-existing universe where no information can be acquired by nothing . I think yes but there is no way of detecting it bcs its non-existing so cannot interfere with the existing part of it (so otherwise would have beenn existing). Now the real real question is why have to be that existence and non existence can form? Maybe because there are only theese possibilities for something to be.
Is dark matter quantum gravity? Dark matter acts like gravity on the galaxy and also is transparent / does not interact with ordinary matter such as light and heat?
a good theory should be able to predict how much change there is in your pocket, the colour of the pants of that pocket and you being asleep or not at once...
i say this cause of course a theory will not ever be able to do this, but the thought shows the limits of what we could express in mathematical rules and physical observations.. if you follow the perspective of, we need a place for stuff to happen, plus stuff itself plus time for it to happen in and leave it that, you define an ontological prison that will never include change in your pocket, evolution, heartbreak, youtube or consciousness itself. The order of logic in this perspective is highly influenced by a cultural perspective/paradigm that “we live in a a place in a time where things have always been the way they are... well except for the Big Bang and before that but let’s leave that out”
i am a great supporter of turning things around: no law of physics, in it’s own terms exists outside of a human mind, attributing meaning to symbols that reflect rules that have been distilled from logic and experimental observations. It’s a necessary choice for us to make that they are laws, but they have no fundament older than some century or so, and remain stuck at the level of concensus and choice.
So, for me to turn things around, nothing would exist without consciousness, being able to through the human interface observe and interact with a reality that without no logic can be separated from itself. Consciousness should be the starting point of any theory that describes anything at all, and basically, i feel that once we make this paradigm shift, everything will fall into place and we can actually know what’s what and where in which colour at any given time - for we ourselves our consciousness decides every aspect of the present moment
The universe and all it's 'laws' must be a physical as well as a mental tautology both consistent and complete in order to explain both matter and mind and which is mathematics itself. Nothing else is capable of both period.
Who is the 'well known philosopher' the interviewer is reffering to in the beginning?
Socrates
💐
Reality = Information / R = I
he has the right reasoning but the wrong conclusions
Who is the creator?
SO CLEAR İF YOU SEE İTS ONLY A SİMULATİON.
Indeed!
so whats outside the simulation and can it be questioned to be one??
Kaku is a brilliant guy. Maybe God really didn't have a choice and we cannot disprove it unless someone runs a universe sized computer simulation with different physical laws and physical constants.
I love science fiction! The Earth is YHVH'S and the fullness there of. It is on foundations and can not be moved. It has a solid firmament above and the luminaries are close as are the sun and the moon. Sun and moon approx. 30 Miles across. Moon slightly closer and both approx. 3000 miles above us when directly overhead. Water is flat as far as you can see. Columbus never sailed over a curved surface because it doesn't exist.
🙏☁️❤️
There is no equation that can solve the fact that our Creator has used computing technology similar to the voice recognition/search engine technology that he had his characters build to speak his simulation program into existence. We are nothing but characters who come alive in a simulation as it's being played out according to very well planned thoughts.
So how do you explain the existence of psychedelics?
John Angelov
God has used psychedelic drugs to establish some of his chosen believers. I have met many believers who came to believe that there has to be a Creator while they were using these types of drugs.
@@BradHolkesvigI can attest to this in a way
Kaku answered nothing...because ha can't.
We would a extinct if there would be an answer, bad people would enslave us & destroy
Yes the universe has to be the way it is and the laws because creation is not possible without it. Everything will cheese to exist otherwise.
:How can order and organization be created spontaneously from an explosion?
Because without it, we simply wouldn’t be at all
Well, it wasn't. In the beginning there was singularity. Order and organization came later.
As cosmic inflation expand tiny point universe, quantum wave generated forms quantum gravity particles / dark matter that gradually reduces inflation to hubble cosmological constant expansion of dark energy?
In order for laws to exist, there must be a law-maker. - Common Sense, 2016 (Who or what that law-maker is, well... )
Shean Crane Universe is the maker praise the universe for everything!
or a writer of code if the universe is indeed a simulation.
Reality must be information itself. We're in a computer game. God designed it.
Michio's approach and thinking are too concrete.
Jesus was God "logging in" and using the command console to resurrect and walk on water.
@@Cooler3546 Brett Olsen gets it. God bless!
What's the ultimate nature of questions?
He's trying to address the most basic questions.
And yet there's not a single new twist, he's just repeating what he has learned.
Listen to it again if you don't believe me:)
Very true.
Half inch long..yeah thats michio kaku
'Everything that can happen, will happen' i think there relies more than we can ever imagine. Sth like the infinity of all infinities
Gosh, Kaku is such an amicable guy that it's so hard to disagree with him. He's the kind of guy I wish lived next door, that I could invite over for a beer.
But, regarding his ideas, he's a priori a scientific materialist who gives no reason for why he assumes this worldview to be more plausibly true than say any version of poly-theism, animism or classical theism. So I approach his comments with great hesitation and skepticism.
Michio describes the exact same thing, but in a scientific way. Poly theism is just god divided in multiple aspects, animism is pretty much the same concept and classical theism is the same except god is described as a metaphysical being. You have to realise that, even though there is a lot of delusion surrounding religion, it does actually describe how reality works. I see it as metaphysical science. Religions tried to translate this "metaphysical science" into words, but that's hard to do obviously. They all have their own descriptions, but it is ultimately the exact same thing.
I have my own made 'Law Of Possibilities' (according to which everything is possible) written in an unpublished scientific paper of my own. Tell me if anyone wants it, I can send it to him/her.
Hey, can you send me it by any chance?
Could God destroy “him self” ie commit a cosmic suicide so that nothing could ever be for all eternity?
Ninja-Wizard himself?
Patrick Longhi himself, herself, it, they, them., up, down. it’s why I put it in “ “ just in case people genuinely believed that God was a “he” I was pointing out how wrong you are.
In a thought experiment I read in God's debris - big bang itself is an attempt of God committing suicide. The reason to figure out the answer the only philosophical question- " suicide". The motivation is due to an assertion that " an omnipotent, omnipresent being a.k.a God, will not have an answer to only one question- what would happen if God seize to exist?"
A politician's answer. Why is there something rather than nothing? "We don't know." would have been the honest answer.
The answer is in math and in physics even nothing is something
What if humans had 12 fingers and our number system were based on 12?
all hail the high dark lord of the black turtleneck bow ye fools
The only Mathematical Consistency is The Number NINE (9) Duplicated IN ANY WAY. All the rest? ARE ALL OVER THE PLACE...
We all wish that we could live on Cloud Nine. Hell yeah!
You want nature of reality,play some jerry goldsmith star trek opening theme soundtrack,that is perfect creation not bullshit boring mathematics theories
He isn't really saying anything. Why is there something rather than nothing? Maybe there was always something. Maybe "nothing" is absurd, and not a part of reality.
Nothing is just anything that has yet to be measured.
Why can't nothing be 'the absence of anything'?
+nadoeloiskat I can't stress on unseen assumptions but let's assume your approach to understanding deeper underlying meaning has atleast some validation, but what gives you the right to proclaim god, Jesus, deity would have any interest in convincing +Anthony pirtle otherwise?
***** I didn't mean it to sound like accountability is on you. Rather why would you assume on loose principles of someone in the magnitude of a deity?
***** in other words you would be in contradiction if you chose to think a deity had given choices and people couldnt delve into that. What comes as the consequence is maybe another chapter.
Physicists are awfully sure of themselves. Most of them.
Wait! Did he just say that there is a "God" then?
Well, not the type of God you conventionally think of. He's talking about the God in which Einstein was privy to, namely Spinoza's version of God.
@@BUDGETBALLER yeah ok, that Espinoza name I've heard before.
men have math, God or whatever/ whoever has all of everything which is, and will remain, beyond the scope of man's understanding.
this guy is if deepak chopra was a physicist.
0 = 0
a simple mistake leads to a great failure
Basically dodged the question. Fundamental physics is still a tangled mess with nothing real to add ATM.
Dr. Kaku is my least favorite "science" personality. He plays it very safe and only comments on things that are reasonably obvious to this audience to begin with.
The inverse is why I dislike DeGrasse-Tyson.Brian Greene is in the middle.
Yea, but Michio actually went to the best university in the world and influenced quantum physics more than any other physicist in this age... Yet Neil is just a science educator.
VeracityMedia You dislike him because he doesn't say what you want to hear?
Michio kaku is a great man.
It’s not even reasonable to think a god is involved ! There is no demonstration or measurement of gods work