Refusing to Accept Responsabiity
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июн 2024
- The plaintiff claims the defendant's dog attacked hers, so she's suing for vet bills. The defendant feels bad about what happened, but the plaintiff's dog wasn't leashed at the time.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
Case # 32-228
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court 
Развлечения
![Skilla Baby - Misfit (Feat. Polo G) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IjsylSnNMyw/mqdefault.jpg)
Somebody needs to accept responsibility for this video title.
😂 I know, right!
I just laughed 😂
I just spit my water out 😂
They said let me sound it out lmao 😂
The Plaintiff is a yarn spinner for sure.
wow the audacity of the plaintiff!
Too bad the defendant didn’t counter sue to get her money back.
Yes!
Off leash is always in the wrong. No control of animals,
idiocy.
Plaintiff was damn lucky she paid over half the vet bills, got flipping greedy and wanted more😵💫
She still can, and I hope she does!
Exactly
@@lyndawhite5171not even greedy, ignorance and entitlement she knew from the beginning she was gonna milk this!
@@lyndawhite5171 I'm near certain that those bills were never paid but the upkeep of the owner was
The fact that she is suing for additional bills she might not even have to pay is appalling! Especially after finding out her dog was off leash and the defendant already paid over $5,000. Smh
And lol how matter of fact she was about "yes my dog was truly unleashed" 😂
Defendant should have counter sued
When you know there is maintenance to come, that's normal. You don't have to wait 3,4,5 years for all the bills to come in. Same with people.
I know. She’s being ridiculous.
She's ridiculous, she already paid over 5000.00. Geez. Take on something yourself. ew
Did anyone else notice in the title "Responsabiity"?
Yep, should have been “Responsibility”. 😄
Typos happen
Right away lol
@Charbear25 Sure, if you're illiterate and your editors are illiterate 🙄
They are slipping!
Fair verdict plaintiff is ridiculous
She was only trying to collect money, she didn’t even have proof where the vet says the doggy is going to require future surgeries etc.
"At my age I should do whatever I want" She's a legend! 😂
No. She says that. But rules a judgment for people who also do what they want, which got them before her. IRONIC & an oxymoron!
The plantiff is just greedy! You already received 5,000 lady be grateful for that....smh
She just wants money and I bet has no care to use it on the DOG.
major money grab by a greedy plaintiff.. just lovely defendants.. they took immediate, total, responsibility..
5,400
You don’t know that. Her issue isn’t greed it’s ignorance of the law
Plaintiff looking for a windfall. No way she’s going to take her dog to opthomologist or neurologists . She is an opportunist. SHAME ON HER .
Plaintiff just being greedy at this point like lady she paid more than half you better be lucky she did that take it and shut up!
And that was a LOT. You see so many shows where they won't even pay 100 dollar vet bill. Smh
Exactly!! I was shocked at how much she paid already. Plaintiff is on bs
I believe the defendant. She paid $5400 up front without knowing all the facts. she even financed it!!!!.
Agree. I think maybe the defendant had some responsibility but she shouldn’t pay anymore than she already has.
So glad I don’t have animal responsabiity
😂😂
😂
😂😂
😂
💀💀
Plantiffs is just racking up bills unnecessary . Over $10000 is ridiculous. This is not a windfull.
Windfall
And unnecessarily. Eh, responsability, windfull...
Lol I can't even type those without my autocorrect kicking in lol
Ok you must not know how expensive vet bills can be. And the other owner should have kept her dog away from the smaller dog.
@Ladywolf2263 when you own small dogs and don't have then on a leash either, I'm not trusting any big dog near my little dog. I don't care how friendly someone says their dog is. My dog would be in my arms. The plaintiff is looking for permanent care for something that was partially her fault too.
The plaintiff should have picked her dog up and put the leash on. She’s so entitled
The defendant is a gem and so well spoken. She handled this so well. The plaintiff is greedy and lacks class!
The plantiff was being so greedy. The defendants did accept responsibility...something a lot of people don't do. She should have been thankful.
Wow. Lady got greedy.
The defendant should have gotten some money returned.
No
yes..! could hav definitely gotten most of her $5K back.. plaintiff had her dog off leash..
defendant can still sue for the return of her $$..!
The defendants sister hair is giving 90’s updo, and looks amazing!!
I just told my husband “I kinda love her big hair!”
Meryl streep vibes 😍
Patsy Stone - in the best way possible!
The sister just looks nuts
“Absolutely Fabulous “
You CANNOT SUE for future expenses. Case dismissed.
Dog owner’s like the plaintiff shouldn’t be allowed to have a dog!!
Great point!
This is called being Greedy!!!😵💫🙄
The Plaintiff should have immediately picked up poor Chloe. She could have avoided the whole thing, had she used her brain. Friendly or not, Chloe is tiny and dogs can snap in a second. It's technically more the Plaintiff's fault than the Defendants.
I’m not a pet person but that dog is ADORABLE!
the plaintiff wants free stuff. give me a break lady. Put your dog on a leash.
Plaintiff needs to be grateful the defendant didn't sue for returns of part of her payment.
If your dog is off the leash...you are responsible.
Chloe is adorable, but her Mom needs to accept that she is partly responsible by not leashing and even picking her up just in case the other dog wasn't friendly. This is the first People's Court case of a dog attack that a pitbull wasn't involved!
I was thinking that I don't think I've seen a non-pitbull attack case until this one! Normally it is a pit that attacks or that's involved - this one had NONE WHATSOEVER. :o The lab wasn't even a pit mix! I just found that interesting, tbh.
Little dogs like Chloe can be just as vicious as a big dog!!
Actually more so@GrampiesCorner . I have seen more than once small dogs antagonize or bite bigger dogs. Certain breeds are biters
It’s not the first. There’s approximately 6-7 in its history that didn’t involve a pit bull…
And for a defendant to pay before going to court! And OVER the amount!
I love animals but over $10,000 on bills & the dog still can’t see & has brain damage??! Is that fair to the dog?
It's not. It's sad but it's no life for that dog to live.
That dog AND it's owner are messed up,
The Defendats couldn't have been nicer and the Plaintiff complains that they were a TAG team???? WTF, only one of the sisters talked about what happened because the other sister wasn't there. I think the Plaintiff isn't a very nice person and thinks that just because her dog is small that she doesn't have to follow the leash rules. Put the leash on BEFORE you set the dog ON THE ground, woman !!!! PERIOD !!!! like Judge Judy would say. 💙 😁💙
Pick up her small dog, since she saw them coming.
She just being greedy PERIOD
The defendant is solid human. I wouldn’t have paid a damn penny.
😂😂😂 she’s lucky they didn’t counter for the return of their funds
Seriously 😂😂😂
Why??
@@kweilynross2491 Why what? Why not pay? Because when two dogs go to war...:) It's always the fault of the non leashed animal.
@@Gunnerb52
Because that is a small ass dog!!!
The judge made the right decision.
typical rules don't apply to me. Your dog needs to be on a leash.
Lucky those ladies didn't counter sue.
OMG, the plaintiff did not care about the dogs not getting along till there was the dog fight. Never allow a teacup dog near a reactive or strange dog. Dog fights will happen. So both parties are at fault here. And both dogs are to be leashed at all times in publc.
The defendants dogs were leashed..
No both parties aren’t at fault
I still don't understand people bringing their dogs into court, like it's gonna score sympathy points....
Love the defendents dress. Colors fit her very well
The judge got this one right .
The judge should of tallied up the original bill price & had the plaintiffs reimburse that lady her money . The defendant paid more than half when she didn’t have to .
What a sucker she outright didn't need to pay for all the vet bills including the "future" bills we have zero certainty is nessecarry. If your dogs off leash and something happens it's your responsibility. Wish the judge would have made that clear!!! If the defendant didn't jump immediately to oh I'll pay because she felt bad about the situation she would have paid at most half of the damages!! I disagree with the entire approach to this, the courts consider dogs as a piece of property and yet when damaged you're not receiving the amount it would cost to replace them with the deprecated value in mind. Why...?? Either they are property and you have a duty to minimize your losses or its not property can't be both!! I think people would choose less vet visits if they knew the value was all they would get in court.
If your pets value is monetary based you should not have a pet.
I always snapped the leash on before I unhooked the seat belt.
Plaintiff first problem YOUR DOG IS OFF LEASH. YOUR PROBLEM YOUR FAULT.
The plaintiff is embarrassing, trying to milk this for as much as she can get
Grow up, take accountability, and stop being an opportunist, ridiculous.
Chloe is adorable 🥰
The defendant was more than generous and seems remorseful. Plantiff just wants that money.
Defendant is better than me because I would’ve sued for some of my money back. 50/50 liability
Why would you put a teacup on the ground to put the leash on when you can hold it (as she walked in to court holding it)and easily put the leash on ?!
The lady in the white is a beautiful spirit. You deserve A lot ✨🪄 the defendant has COMPREHENSION ISSUES !! Smh .
Responsabiity , it is surprising that an individual cannot use auto-correct. Additionally, the plaintiff’s pronunciation of words is incorrect.
Omg is that really necessary ? Who really cares .In the scheme of things is it really important ?.Children are dying of disease, hunger , homocide .War has killed hundreds of thousands of people in the last year .It just doesnt pass t.he smell test . I think you need to reuvalulate what is important. Dont come at me because I dont care what you think of my comment .It is my opinion .You dont have to agree with it ,but at least it isnt assinine like your comment
So many people in the comments also seem unable to use autocorrect.
Drives me nuts in these cases when soooo many people say 'arks' instead of 'ask'.
SPELLING PLEASE!!!!
I would never spend that kind of $ on an animal. Good grief
Seriously?? I hope you don’t Own any pets
Really? Remember these animals are family members. We paid over 3k to save my dog in emergency surgery which didn't take, but I'd do it again in a heartbeat.
I’ve absolutely LOVED my pets, but there are limits, unless one has unlimited funds. I agree. Good grief!!!
@@lexilexx545right? I would feel bad for the pet. Animals are family. Period.
I do. But I would not spend that kind of $ on an animal. I think these vets are scammers with this price they charge and then you have to go into debt.
She's lucky defendant didnt countersue for reimbursement. "I have a simple life" implies she thinks the defendant has $. Can't stand this type of entitled New Yorker.
The plaintiff is called “Black Sparrow” from pirates of the Caribbean! The defendant was late for court so she wore her Christmas table cloth!
You mean the colored woman with the ludicrously ridiculous head dress.
ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE 😮
What is with u dog owners asking ppl "Is your dog friendly?" It's ridiculous. Anyone can say yes, that doesnt mean there won't be a fight!
EXACTLY. My stepmom's dog is friendly but to an extent. He actually thinks he's the alpha, and tends to snap (not attack, but give a kinda aggressive bark) toward larger dogs. He's mostly a people lover, but would most likely be okay with dogs his own size - but honestly, I'd just be aware if anyone brought their dog around him, and it doesn't have to be for their sake; What if he snapped and got bit in return?
You never know how a dog may react, and it's also these same people that would say "oh yeah, they get along with MY (insert whatever person here)!" when that same dog attacks someone that's...I don't know...UNAFFILIATED WITH THEM?
Airplane!! ✈️ Crayola with sharpener!! 🖍️ 😂😂😂😂 I love these two ❤❤❤
Someone buy that man a box of crayons
Lady just needed to add possible damages to her dog's outfits and she would've covered everything in this suit!
I know some people probably went that far in cases like this.
A mini rant, feel free to ignore, because I just wanted to add:
Folks, I will never understand why you'd dress your dog like a human as it is. They clearly aren't meant to wear dresses, shirts, and the like from what I've seen of them wearing shoes (remember when they walk in those shoes and have that odd jiggle? Yeah). Plus when you cover their front feet, you're kinda making them unable to defend themselves with them. They may not have retractable claws like a cat, but they do help protect the dog from preditors and helps them hunt. If you wanna play dressup, find a Barbie doll or something...
Dogs only require a collar with a form of ID, not a sweater.
I agree!
IF GREEDY WAS A PERSON IT'D BE THE PLAINTIFF
The plaintiff is dishonest, lacks character and accountability. The exact opposite of the defendants.
She should never have paid her $5000!
The judge gets on my nerves for over talking someone.
She gets on my nerves more when she takes forever on cases that could be handle in less than 10 minutes.
So don’t watch her
@@Mary_Lee2395it a show ma am they have to get entertainment she gets paid for that
That whole story about bending down to put a leash on was BS. The little dog doesn't even have a leash in court🤦
Imagine if it was the other way around-the defendant wouldn’t have received a penny from the plaintiff.
👀 The title. 😂 Also, can’t wait for the court show warriors to pop out and state, “judge blahblah would have done it this way!” 😂😂😂😂😂
To think she was trying to get her to basically pay for her dog for life is laughable
The plaintiff wants the cash. She didn’t expect the defendant to pay via credit lol
The defendant honestly seems like a sweet, caring person. I wish her the best!
Plantiffs is lying and talking too much
And who's dog was not on a leash?
My dog is on a leash when out. While he gets along with dogs we know. The moment I see another person with a dog come close depending on size I always lock his leash, or pick him up. So he’s in my control and if the other dog does something it’s on them. They came up to me. Geeze that little teacup dog should have been leashed and immediately picked up. This is a money grab.
Responsibility 💥💥💥 Plaintiff classless and basically looking for a windfall 🥲. Defendant was graceful, went up and beyond.Kudos Defendant ❤
The nerve of the plaintiff. She is so wrong and obviously needs to learn a hard lesson about owning a dog. The poor defendant looked so sad.
Plaintiff is acting like a professional grifter.
The corgi probably didn’t recognize the teacup Yorkie as a dog, prob thought it was some kind of adorable little rodent. (And I have an adorable Yorkie rodent also)
Not the sound insensitive but it would be cheaper to buy her another dog
Thinking the same. Not paying medical bills in excess of the cost of the dog. Not happening
First, it was due to her and her daughter’s negligence for their yorkie’s injury, they didn’t have her on a leash and even when they saw the the other two dogs approaching they didn’t even bother to take precautions to pick up their tiny dog smh. Second, The plaintiff is only trying to get as much money as she can for this case. She claims and is accepting all these procedures that aren’t necessary or required for her doggy. If it were judge Judy she would’ve gotten an earful and the case would’ve end it as soon as she hears that the dog was not on a leash
I can’t believe the defendant paid any money at all without going to court first! What a nice lady!
That dog wasn’t on leash-it’s her own owners fault. The defendant should have never paid anything.
At least she paid $5400! I would've left her alone!
In addition to the poor dog's injury, the plaintiff decides to dress her in that ridiculous outfit. Glad the little dog is doing well, but plaintiff isn't taking responsibility for her part.
“I really wanna pet Chloe, I can’t stand it anymore”….😂 I LOVE judge Milian so much.
My dogs NEVER come out of my car without their leashes being on. Even in my driveway. She could have scooped that dog up when she saw 2 dogs coming.
Who’s gonna take responsibility for the misspelling of “responsibility” in this title?
😂😂😂
The plaintiff got greedy!! And the defendant did take responsibility!
The moment she admitted her dog was off leash her goose was cooked.
" I want the 64 color crayola box with the sharpener " I now see why hes a keeper 😂
The plaintiff sounds ridiculous.
The plaintiff is nothing more than a greedy money grabber. Shame shame shame. Shows her class.
I was blessed to have the 64 color Crayola box of crayons with the built in sharpener!!! 😂 But, I was the kid that wanted the 96 color Crayola box!!😅 I never did get that one!! 😭😭😭
"Is Chloe friendly? I really wanna pet her. I can't stand it anymore and I think, at my age, I should do whatever I want." LOL
Accountability is like Kryptonite.
The Plaintiff is a liar.
Poor baby. Both parties are responsible. You don't let an unknown dog approach your dog.
I have never taken my dogs outside of my home without a leash nor allowed any dog to approach my dogs.
JM really works my nerves when she cuts people off, cross examining before they can get the story out. I was glad when she finally calmed down and let the plaintiff speak.
Oan: The yorkie is too cute!
I am glad that you didn't get any more money!👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
I don’t trust anyone else’s dog around mine, hence why theirs no meet and greet to avoid any of these potential suits
The fact that the defendant paid the money so fast and didn’t even counter sue for full or half the money back show she’s a good person ! The plaintiff is greedy
your dog is basically a telephone. 😂😂😂😂😂
Defendant should get the 5k back! Plaintiff's dog was unleashed. She is 100% responsible for the medical bills.
I love how he never forget about how badly he wanted that Crayola box. I feel his pain! I wanted it also😢
Plaintiff wants money for a series of ops for an older and obviously disabled Yorkie. Yep okay.
And Tea Cup Yorkies….(having bred them) are brilliant but they are unaware of how tiny they are ….one of mine would attempt to down a German Shepherd who would stand looking completely confused as a whirlwind of hair weaved wildly through his legs.
This is a simple money grab from the plaintiff…the idea of subjecting that dog to a series of ops is cruel and I’d hope that a vet would think really hard before doing anything other than care to keep the pup comfortable for her remaining time.
The plaintiff would not have been able to prove that the on going vet bills were because of the injuries regardless so she should be thankful she got $5400 at all