Mr. Heilbron, I thanked you so much for your informative, straight forward, and easy to understand for a non English native speaker like me. These video helped me able to properly use a camera, and now I cannot even believe that the pictures I took were mine, without you I wouldn't know how fun it is to take a photo with camera
Seven years old and still very helpful. Always enjoy your videos. My Nikon has been with me in China, Vietnam and Cambodia. Your videos helped with thousands of (I feel) beautiful images. Thanks Maarten.
I enjoy this as well, I Truly hope he does more in the Future 🙏 I truly like the Nikon D-3400 as well, other than having other Cameras I just like this little Gem 💎 I hope he does one Video a month on the D-3400 i would surely enjoy, I will truly follow if he considers the task.!, I am a new patron.of the Art of photography Boston Massachusetts
Maarten, Thank you for sharing your knowledge of the camera and lenses. I'm a noob with the D3400 and sincerely appreciate your instruction style. My college professor directed me to your training to help with learning my specific D3400 camera, I'm very thankful for her guidance...thanks, Professor Kit!
I always appreciated viewer comments with kind words - a pleasure to read yours. I'm also thankful to your professor for recommending my channel, please extend my thanks to him.
I would want to know how far you are standing from the home with the wreath. That seems to be an important piece of information. Across the street, a block away, an acre away, a mile away? But thanks for a great and clear and concise explanation and comparison of the 75 mm - 300 mm lens.
Hello Maarten, thank you for such an informative video. I recently purchased this model with both the 18-55 and the 70-300 lenses, and this video was a great place for me to start!
Hi, thank you for the detailed explanation. I have D3400 with both lenses default n 70-300. Just wanted to know are there any telescopic lense compatible with D3400??
Wow I am thinking of buying this camera for my Art projects How does it capture Shadows and details even from a distance? As a Artist it is more rewarding to me to be able to find subjects or items to paint or draw in a sketch. I just hope the learning curve is not to bad what do you think?
It's ability to capture detail is good, as the sensor is APS-C sized (Full frame would be better). However, a great deal depends on the lens, the lighting and the settings you use. The camera offers many modes from fully automated to completely manual, so you should be able to find settings that allow you to concentrate on your artistic/creative vision while the camera handles the technical details. That said, if you are interested in maximizing shadow details, it would be best to familiarize yourself with the dynamic range adjustments available.
Hello Sir! this video was more informative to understand how lens work, when to choose which lense for the purpose. Thanks for the video. I got the D3400 for the budget point, can you suggest a 50 mm lense alternative to original Nikon considering the price to get lower and without comprising the quality and performance equivalent/close to original Nikon lense in terms of features. My requirement is for photography for occasional ceremonies and few out door camping, I love to have back ground blur and more detail on the people. Thanks in advance if you can answer.
Hi very informative video, thanks. I have a doubt, I started photography with d3400 18-55mm kits only. But now when I got some chance to took photo with zoom lens 70-300mm, I would like to buy a lens for my own. But my confusion is does the zoom lens actually required? Can we take pics with kit lens? Is there difference in sharpness and quality of kit lens and zoom lens when it comes to portrait and landscape? I heard zoom lens are mostly used for wildlife and sports photography. I am but confused that should I go for a zoom lens as photography is my hobby not profession and I would like to improve my photography skills as well? Can you please share your thoughts on this, it will be very helpful. Thanks
I appreciate your kind words, thanks for commenting. The difference is primarily (as you likely noticed) the focal length (or field of view) - how close you can get to far away objects. As for quality, the price of a lens (with the exception of some prime lenses) is usually a good indication of their quality. The kit lens for the D3400 does not deliver all of the quality the sensor is capable of capturing.
Thank you for this video! So informative. I am looking to get a portrait lens and considering the 50mm 1.8, also considering the 40mm f/2.8g for some Micro photography(newborn mostly) I am reading that the 40mm can be used for portraits as well so I’m wanting to know if you think it’s better to get both. I have a D3400 and am wanting to move up from the kit lens.
I do appreciate knowing that my videos are useful, thanks for commenting. I'd get and use the 50mm - I think you'll find it good for your purpose and you won't need the 40mm.
Thank you for the video. Very helpful. I am wondering if I can use my Tamron AF Aspherical XR LD [IF] 28-300mm 1:3.5-6.3 Macro 62 lens that I currently use with my Nikon D70 camera. I am figuring it will work since it is an F mount on the D70 and it was made for F mount cameras. I'm very excited to find all your videos so I can learn more.
I'm happy to hear you found it useful. Yes, in general F-mount lenses are compatible with all Nikon bodies. Older lenses won't do autofocus or auto aperture (exposure) - but if you can overcome those limitations, they will work. And thank you for your kind words. The description contains links to the other videos I produced about the Nikon D3400, but you'll also find reviews of other Nikon models in a playlist.
Thank you Maarten. I will be watching all your videos. I'm leaning toward a little higher model, maybe a 5600. I do a lot of manual focus, even though I can set on auto. I just like doing it. Thank you for your help. I truly appreciate it.
What is the difference in picture quality with VR and NON VR? It seems an extended lens in NON VR would be at risk for shake from the cick of the camera or just a shaky hand of the photographer and VR would help to eliminate that.
Thank you for the review on lenses for the D-3400, I truly have fun with this oldie.! Please 🙏 keep reviewing this old Camera there are many beginners that will follow, Again ThankYou for your review it was very comprehensive. and you make it easy to understand.! Please 🙏 still do a monthly review on this Camera no matter how old.! ● I checked liked ● Watched B& H Comercial ● and The U.V. light Comercial completely through, so give you kudos,,, Remember there are many out there that you can help on a modest investment to the D-3400 You'll be helping a lot of Amateurs that Truly need your help.! And you are extremely wonderful on teaching, Again Please don't STOP showing this old Diamond in the ruff, Your followers will follow.! Great review, Even if 7 years old, viewers are still watching this old Video such as I -- Boston Massachusetts
Many thanks for your videos regarding the Nikon d3400, they were very helpful, they are excellently made and very well explained. Thank you very much again. Greetings from Argentina.
Hi ! I am want to buy the D3400. I was wondering which would be a better choice for lens , the AFP 18 - 55 kit lens or should i exchange it for a 50 mm f2.8 prime . I am new to DSLR photography and just want to stick to one lens for the time being .. would appreciate your valuable input ..
Maarten!! another great video as usual. I am a photo journalist and an indie cinematographer.. Just like to watch your videos :) quick tip for those who uses these lenses for video; if you don't have a cine lens, use multi colored sticker strip to mark your focus on the barrel so you can zoom in and out between your desired objects smoothly. follow focus add on will come in handy, too. Once you get used to the custom, it's easy. Just my humble opinion .. Thank you - regards from Boston ..
Hello Boston (fond memories ...) and thanks for the kind words and useful comments. I use masking tape and a thin line marker - but on these lenses, it's only effective for zoom. Trying to do follow or rack focus with these two lenses can be frustrating as it has to be by eye and the markings are not reliable - but that's true of any lens with auto focus by wire. I do find that the better Nikon lenses with the focus distance marking to be simpler to manage. The focus distance (although managed with a clutch) is at least reasonably clearly defined, so as long as you don't push against the boundary, the markings should stay pretty close.
I bought a D3400 today. I used an F3 back in the old days. When you pulled out the 35mm film it gave me a sense of nostalgia. Thanks for that and your vids.
The ability to change aperture in Live View with the AF-P lenses is reason enough to prefer them over the earlier kit lenses. But, Nikon really needs to make the ability to change aperture in Live View a feature of each new body, not each new lens. But I really like the D3400, very nice grip, light weight, battery life and IQ are class leading.
While I'm in complete agreement, I feel that there is something about the lens technology that doesn't allow it on those models - but I have no technical insight to back that up. On the other hand, Nikon (more than most) is very prone to arbitrarily removing features from less expensive models even if it is only firmware.
***** That is true, Nikon like Canon, is very careful not to cannibalize sales of its higher end models by making fully loaded low end models. Can't really blame them. But I know from my D800 and its lack of aperture changing in Live View, that it must be some technical problem with all the bodies that has yet to be solved. Cheers.
Wait - it's not a limitation of the body, it's a limitation of the lens. Some lenses (I thought it was ones with E in the name) as I learned in my review of the D5500 (ruclips.net/video/esc0PNAh9-k/видео.html) just need the right lens - in that case the DX16-80E. But it seems to be supported on the 70-300 DX VR as well, although not the kit. The D3400 body can do it, with the right lens.
***** Good point. Now I'm wondering (maybe you know) if the AF-P 18-55 kit lens on other Nikon bodies like the D5500 or D7100 will allow you to change the aperture in Live View? Thanks, good channel.
My Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 allows Live View aperture adjustment for stills (Manual Movie Settings "On), but not while shooting video. Is this odd? Also Maarten, I think it would be nice if you provided an overview of available lenses for this camera that cost less than, say, US $500. Not full reviews, just tell everyone what's out there. If you do, don't leave out the Samyang/Rokinon primes. They're great values, and even allow the camera to control shutter speed and aperture with modern Nikon bodies.
Another question please: from non-photographers view: "can 18-300 lens replace both 18-55 and 70-300 legs requirement?" Your experienced answer please.
Yes, but with a reduction in available apertures and some loss in quality. Otherwise, you will have all of the focal lengths represented by the other two lenses.
Thank you for your very informative videos. I am a beginner and just made the decision to purchase the D3400 over the D3300. I purchased the bundle that included the 15-55mm VR and the 70-300mm [Non-VR] lenses. My question is with the 70-300mm telephoto lens which for some reason does not have VR. What are the implications of a Non-VR zoom lens for a beginner like myself? The bundle with the two lenses was much more advantageous to purchase. For some reason the D3000 bundle includes both kit lenses with VR, but the D3400 did not. This created a tough decision on deciding between the D3300 and D3400 Bundles. Thank you for all your help.
Thank for for taking the time to share your kind words. The lack of VR, which saves a few dollars on that lens, shouldn't affect much. In low light situations you'll be faced with the choice of a higher ISO or using a tripod. The VR version will allow you to shoot at a slightly slower shutter speed. Those bundle choices make me crazy - but it's always worth negotiating with your dealer.
@@MaartenHeilbron even the budget segment lens costs much. This 70-300mm lens is the same as a watchman's fairly paid salary in India. So we must accept that we must learn to live with these lenses what we can afford. The pros can afford those expensive glass as they are earning from it. Many studios here use point and shoot for small passport size or postcard size photo. D3100 or D5100 for wedding photos using kit lens. Very few use pro grade lens and body. But yes, we can afford few cheap but excellent prime lenses such as 35 and 50mm. That makes the photos turn out much better.
hello sir, that was quite helpful. do u suggest getting both the 18-55mm & 70-300mm lense kit or just the 18-55mm one? please do respond, as it would help me make an informed decision. thanks in anticipation. :)
Thanks for the kind words, always appreciated. I suggest getting just the 18-55. I recognize it's bargain, particularly with the kit, but I'll bet you'll rarely use it - unless you're doing a lot of nature/bird photography or your children play sports.
Thank you so much sir. The information you gave was much helpful and i thank you for your time, i really appreciate it. I hope you have a great day. 😊 i am just a beginner, but your videos are so helpful, please keep the great work going.
I am new to photography and trying to Learn from your videos about my d3400. Many many helpful hints so far but my question is, How did you get zoomed in that close to the snowman in the still not the video? Everytime I try to zoom in that close (I'm taking closeup stills of jewelry and art) it refuses to focus or beep so I can shoot. I understand the relationship between iOS, ss, and aperture now as far as lighting but not sure why I can't get super close. It may be that I have left the AF on. Is that the only piece I'm missing for the close ups and blurred background? I really had just decided I had made a mistake buying this camera until I found your videos. Hoping you can shed some light on this for me
Thanks for the kind words - and that's an excellent question. I'm always shooting closeups of camera parts, so can completely sympathize - it's a challenge. Not sure which lens you are using, but check the specifications to see how close it can focus - the subject may be too close. For that kind of work, I really recommend a macro lens which gets in much closer. Lenses do have autofocus trouble with very close objects, so I would use manual focus ( ruclips.net/video/KTPpDY8H7DE/видео.html) and just turn the ring until the distance is as close to the camera as possible. Then move the object until it's in focus. Hope this helps.
Thanks for the video. I am just starting out and have the D3400 with the 18-35mm kit lens and the 70-300mm. I want to focus on macro photography and I recently purchased a set of 3 extension tubes (more like rings...) The markings on each are 12mm, 20mm Digital, and 36mm N-AF. I wanted to try out the inexpensive option before buying a Nikon macro (micro?) lens. For the extensions, should I use only one, or a combination? The photos I have taken are a little blurry as the depth of field seems narrower with the tubes. Should I limit my expectations with these? Is it common for a great looking macro shot found on Google, etc to actually be a composite of several images because of the depth? Even a small house spider that I captured had its back legs out of focus. And lastly...is there a macro lens you recommend? Thanks again for the great video.
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. You may use the extension tubes singly or in combination. It's typical that it's hard to focus (it's hard even with dedicated macro lenses), and it's typical to have a very, very small depth of field. You can try to add more light to enable a smaller aperture for a larger depth of field, or, as you suggest, you can take multiple images (this is called focus stacking) and combine the images in photoshop. And yes, it is possible that a great looking macro shot is a composite or focus stacked image. While a more expensive lens is always better, I'd also recommend a focal length in the 50-80mm range - with a smaller focal length you'll be so on top of the subject that the lens will cause a shadow. Hope this helps.
thanks Maarten, good video. Quick question, should I invest in a prime lens? (the camera came with the kit lens 18-55) I was looking at the Nikkor 50mm 1.8G and Nikkor 35mm 1.8G but with the 1.5 DX crop factor the 50mm will be more less 75? right? so, is it better to buy the 35mm for street and portrait photography? thx. Gregoz
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. The 35mm will be more versatile - with crop the 50mm won't be very useful when shooting on the street. The 35mm will be fine for portraits, but 50 would be better. You could use the kit for street and the 50 for portraits ... my issue with the kit is that the quality is quite a bit less than the sensor in the D3400, which you will appreciate the second you take a photo with a better lens.
thank you, that's what I thought, I am not really happy with the kit lens, it's not very sharp. I bought Sigma 70-300mm for wildlife and night photography but the lens is very narrow, not good at all for the street shots. So, I might get the 35mm 1.8G, it's the same price as the 50mm and I don't do too much of the portrait photos anyway. thanks again, Gregoz
Which camera is better Canon 200d or Nikon D3400 ? And yes i am interested in potraits , landscape and street photography which lens would you suggest for Nikon d3400 ?
They are fairly similar, so choose the one you prefer based on style, cost and hand fit. Wirecutter has some excellent Nikon (and Canon) lens suggestions.
hi, I was wondering what lens to choose I have a few options because I want to buy my first lens for my new Nikon d3400 and I am on a budget. Which one fits and is the best overall, the D3400 will be my first DSLR I had a point and shoot before this but if the sun isn't out the camera doesn't take good photographs. Well, the lenses are: Nikon Nikkor AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G Lens, Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG Macro and, Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro (Nikon).
Is it safe to assume you already have the kit lens? I'm not sure what you're planning to shoot - but it sounds like you're planning to shoot wildlife or birds with the lenses you mention. All three of those are fairly similar in capability and (I suspect) quality. None are bad and having not tried them, I can't say if one is better than another. However, unless you're shooting on a sunny day in full light, you may find that the F5.6 aperture at full zoom to be limiting.
@@MaartenHeilbron I don't have a kit lens yet but I am planning on buying a 50mm and a 70-300, I would love to shoot some wildlife and birds. What would you suggest? I am planning on buying some lenses second hand because I have a pretty small budget. Would you suggest buying the kit lens first? Thanks again for all your helpfull video's
I think the kit lens doesn't do the camera justice. Buy the 50mm. The 70-300 is a good choice for wildlife because of its reach, but it requires sunny days (or a tripod) because the aperture closes as you zoom in.
Still enjoying my D3400 HOWEVER I am getting an R11 in the view finder. Changed lenses.....camera still seems to take photos BUT that doesn't go away. Some have said its a full buffer...........but its all the time now, even when I first turn on camera. Even did a reset....any suggestions? Thanks in advance
Love your videos--super helpful for getting started with our new d3400. I've been looking into getting a uv filter to protect our lenses (which are the 2 you show in the video). I understand (I think) that I'd want 55 and 58 mm diameter filters, but the other options are a bit overwhelming. It sounds like multicoat, thin, brass (vs aluminum) filters are best, but at that price point I worry I'm buying more filter than is really necessary for those lenses. It also looks like amount of light transmitted is another factor to cconsider... How do you recommend chosing a protective filter?
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. The filter diameter should match the lens (so if the lenses are 55mm and 58mm, those are the filter diameters you need). I would simply buy the least expensive ones that a reputable camera store sells, and ignore the snake oil and precious metals that are applied in an attempt at product differentiation and increased margins.
Both are good choices, the 85mm is the traditional portrait choice - but on a DX body, it will be a little tight, the 50mm would be the equivalent for the DX sensor.
i have seen some of your videos today about lumix and sony camer you provide most indepth and to the point review my question is which camera you used to shoot this video??
Great piece of information, could you please share the difference between "AF-P DX Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR Lens" and "AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon ".
AF-P (pulse) is a newer focussing motor design, the AF-S is older and somewhat noisier. A G lens does not have an aperture ring, and the aperture is set with a motor by adjusting settings on the camera. (The older D lenses have a manual aperture ring). VR (vibration reduction) is Nikon's optical stabilization technology. Not all lenses are compatible with all cameras - you'll find a compatibility chart at Nikon's web site for the camera you own.
Great video! I have a specific followup question: Would you say that replacing the kit lens with the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM makes sense for sharper photos, particularly for someone mostly photographing landscapes who still prefers travelling with only one multi purpose lens, or is such good glass wasted on an entry level body, so that I should upgrade to say a D7200 first? Also, is the lack of image stabilisation in the sigma lens a deal breaker if virtually all of my shots are hand held (on the go while hiking), though usually in broad daylight?
I would support your plan - the deficiencies of the D3400 are in the features and control set, not in image quality. I'm not familiar with that lens, but it sounds like than should be a good combo. Upgrade bodies only if you know that there's a specific feature you're missing that you need. As for stabilization, it's for photographers with long lenses with smaller apertures shooting in relatively low light situations.
Maarten Heilbron I formed the plan to get it because reviewers everywhere hail it as the best walkabout lens ever made for Nikon DX. However, reviews rarely talk about real world usage like the impact of the mentioned missing stabilisation in context with landscape photos. So thank you for taking the time to clear that up! From all the hype that's being made around tech like Panasonic's dual I.S. and so on I got the impression that shooting handheld without stabilisation is generally a bad idea.
the results seem pretty astounding, even with the 18-55mm nikkor kit lenses. A $10 ring vs a $200 dedicated macro lens? cheap enough that i have a reverse ring on the way for my D3300
I think that you'll find some expert guidance here, with more detail and insight than i can provide: thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
Sir, so happy to have found your channel.i want to purchase a d3400, what would u suggest me ?Buy it along with the dual lenses ie .,18-55 and 70-300 or just the 18-55mm to begin with.
I'm also happy you found my channel. I have no reason to talk you out of purchasing a D3400 - it's a good choice for an entry-level camera. I would not choose either of those lenses, as I find the quality to be less than the sensor can deliver. I would suggest the 16-70, but if that's an option that's too expensive (but remember that you can use that lens for a long time), I would recommend that you purchase one or two prime lenses with large apertures. I do like the recommendations made by wirecutter. thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
What camera are you using now? The D3400 is a bit basic, but perfectly suitable - however you'd probably like a lens better than the kit lens. Are you planning to do tethered shooting?
Sir, I was wondering if I could get some advice on a dslr purchase. I am planning on buying a refurbished Nikon D3400 dslr from Kaleidoscope electronics and I have two main questions: First what, if any, hesitations would you have about buying a refurbished camera, and second there is a package option that includes a AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm lens (non VR) and it seems to be a good deal on the lens, but I was wondering if you thought it would be worth the money for photographing landscapes and cityscapes. I would imagine the large zoom would be nice but since it doesn't have VR I though it might be too ambitious for myself as a beginner to use. Thanks for your help and I really appreciate the awesome videos!
Thank you for your kind words, they are appreciated. I have no idea about refurbs, but it depends on your confidence in the dealer and the warranty they provide. Not sure that's a great lens for landscapes or cityscapes - I'd prefer something 50mm or less. And read my reply to Tracey (earlier today) about VR. Finally, I don't think any lens is "ambitious", beginner or no.
@@MaartenHeilbron I have a question for you (I figured since you replied to my message, you are probably checking them often, and not like others) So I'm traveling next month and I don't want to take to much of my gear. I'm using Nikon D7500 and hoping to take just one or two lenses. Do you think that AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED will do just fine if I plan on taking pictures of landscape and everyday life? Or you would recommend that I would take something else for general photography? I guess I want to know really if this lens would be ok for taking pictures of people?
I do make it a point to reply to all relevant and civil questions and comments. It's a great landscape and architecture lens, and even for food, but not much else. In general, it's the 16/24-70/105 range that most consider a useful travel walk-about lens. I can recommend the Nikkor 16-80 as an excellent travel companion. If you just want to add one small/inexpensive lens to the travel kit, I'd take a 50mm, it's a nice people/portrait lens.
Sir will U please explain the utility of a 18-55 kit lense set at 50mm focal length and that of a 50mm prime lense to compare the field of view i.e to take a large group photo covering each member. Are they same?
At 50mm the field of view will be approximately the same. These numbers are rarely exact. I suspect for a large group, the 18mm position on the kit lens will be better able to capture them all.
Very help full video, I need a zoom lens for my Nikon D5300, may i select this lens(Afp 70 to 300ed vr)? is it long lasting capability. What u think about this plastic made lens mount. Tight budget. Thx
I appreciate your kind words, thanks. That's a reasonable choice on a tight budget. The only thing to consider with a plastic lens mount is wear and tear - if you're a reasonably careful photographer and take care of your equipment it should last. I wouldn't recommend it for working photographers who are constantly switching lenses. What I do find (and I'm not judging on this specific combination) is that the plastic mount is often not quite as secure and tight a fit.
Hey Maarten, After having enough fun with the D3400, would you be so kind to "touch" an A6500? I am especially interested in learning from you the Sony touch screen. Sony should have come to you and ask you to make tutorial videos for the A6500. If I were a marketing manager, I'd do that, sure.
I honestly don't know which would be the cheapest. However, I suggest that the cheapest will not provide good results. I've just started shotoing wit the Ronin-S, and that seems like a good unit to me (although I'm not using it wth the D3400, so can't really judge how appropriate it is for that size/weight).
thank you very much sir.... for giving me a rply, if u have any idea about which gimble is suitable for d3400.. so then suggest me I'll buy it for shooting... and please tell me about vedio settings and with which lence i shoot vedio for better results.. i have a nikon 50mm 1.8g prime lence, 18/55 basic lence also... please give me some suggestions
Always happy to help. Other than the Ronin-S, I have no suggestions for gimbals. In general I find them all somewhat difficult to configure and complicated to get good results. The Ronin-S seems better than the rest, and it's slightly larger to accommodate larger DSLR sized cameras. For video, try this: ruclips.net/video/4eSCnLqAB6k/видео.html
huge thanks sir... your vedios r very helpful for me and everyone ... as a beginner i learn lot of things from your vedios and also thanks for sharing valuable time and information...... you r the inspiration of every beginner 😊😊😊🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫
Hello sir I have a kit lens for my D3400 (Nikkor DX VR AF-P 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6G) Now i wish to upgrade the lens, perhaps 70-300 range, Which lens specifications do you recommend? The one in the video itself? Also sir, in low price range than nikkor lens Which brand & compatible type do you suggest for my D3400. Would be really great if you kindly revert. Thanks a lot. Video is very informative.
Both can work. You may have an easier time with the Yonguo as its aperture opens to F1.8 - but at the 300mm end, the Nikon should also provide a pleasing bokeh.
Hello Maarten. Thanks for your channel. There is still a question I'm having difficulty with : if you take "similar" cameras, i.e., same make, APSC, DSLR, similar pixels, use the same lens on each, say 50mm 1.8, ignore "details" sur as Wifi or not, flip screen, what is going to be the difference in image quality and/or shooting experience between the different cameras in a different price range ?? If I'm not clear, here's an example : what will be the image quality difference and shooting experience difference between a Nikon d3300/3400, a d5500/5600 & a d7100/7200 ? And why is the d3300 always referred to as a beginner's camera, for instance, if (IF !) the image quality can be as good as on a d7100? Thanks a lot for your response ! In peace and friendship, Eric
I appreciate the kind words, thanks. I think the D3K series are usually referred to as "entry-level" - which primarily refers to the price point. It's a beginner camera only inasmuch as it's a good choice for someone who is not yet fully committed to photography either as a career or a passion. Nikon sensors tend to vary in quality over time (that is, in general, 2017 sensors are better than 2014 sensors), and not by model number. As models get upgraded at different times, they are sometimes out of sync, so a lesser model may get a newer processor before a more expensive one does. The primary differences between the 3K, 5K and 7K series are the quality of the construction of the body, and the features and functions that are offered. If you want a better (or larger) body, more and better control, or more features, you'll end up paying for it. Hope this helps.
So, in fact, what you are saying is that indeed it is possible to get as good an image - even on a regular basis - with a D3K as with a D7K ? But the latter is more heftily built and will have more controls immediately to hand ? Thanks, Maarten, very much. Eric
Have you tried the kit lens and find it unsuitable? Here are some tips: ruclips.net/video/FgpHdMxv2rg/видео.html I assume you'd like to take portraits with soft defocussed backgrounds. Look for a lens in the 35-50mm FX range or 50-85DX range with a large aperture - say F2. or less. That should perform suitably for that need. More expensive lenses will provide a more pleasing bokeh pattern. Here are some tips I find useful: thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
I am learning photography as a hobby. Would you recommend D3400? If yes then is it OK to start with 18-55 mm kit lens? I don't want to spend too much money but want something to get started. If not D3400 then which other entry level DSLR would you recommend along with the lens?
Hello Maarten, Thank you for these amazing videos ! I am planning to buy 1 or 2 lens for my 3400 For events and portraits - i checked 85mm 1.8g (may not be suitable for indoor) , 50mm 1.4g and 50 mm 1.8g , could you please suggest which one would be better with this camera model ? and was looking for a budget lens for wildlife - Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 70 - 300 mm f/4.5 - 6.3G ED VR Lens or Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55 - 300 mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Lens ...
They would all be fine. The 50mm 1.4 has the best ability to provide a defocussed background, and with the DX sensor, the standard portrait focal length. You will find the 85 to be a little close, which, as you suggest, is particularly a problem indoors.
A bit off topic, I guess, but this is a question I haven't found an answer to anywhere. Does a 35mm FX lens on a dx body produce the same field of view ( hence the same image) as a 35mm dx lens on a dx body?
Hello Maarten, I am planning to buy hood for AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR lens, But I am confused which one I should buy and not sure about the hood size. Could you please let me know the hood size.
I've got a question. I'm interested to buy this camera with 70-300 FX lens (for 450mm telezoom for natural photography) which doesn't have autofocus motor. Now, is there any autofocus adapter in the market which can give me autofocus in this camera - lens combination? Suggestion please.
I've got a reply. How have you concluded that this lens doesn't have AF? According to the Nikon site, it does: en.nikon.ca/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/af-p-nikkor-70-300mm-f%252f4.5-5.6e-ed-vr.html
sir i shot with nikon 3400 with kit lens some time i need to focus on my model and some thing with it but when i shot only 1 thing is in focus plz help me with The setting .....
Sri at last i choose nikon d3400. I do not wrist my manny. Nikon d3400 is a very good dslr . So sri thanks for thish video . Or sri hdr not supported nikon d3400?
Thank you for your kind words. Theoretically, it is, however, I would recommend a better lens, with a sharper image (the kit is terrible) and a larger aperture.
Nice video, but i have a question, if i get a AF lens for Nikon D3400, i will only be able to focus on manual, right? (sorry about my bad english, i'm brazillian XD)
I bought this camera for Xmas and struggling to understand which lens had the f mount. I currently have the 18-55 could you tell me what bit of information suggests that a lens is f mount as I don't want to order the wrong one
Sorry if that wasn't clear - Nikkor lenses are all F-mount (except for some really, really old ones). Other manufacturers may specific Nikon mount of F-mount, which is pretty much an interchangeable term.
That lens is too big to be inconspicuous or usable. I'd go with the street standard - like an FX 35 or 24mm (on this DX body those are approx 50mm and 35mm). And there's always good lens advice at wirecutter.
Not quite sure what you mean - if you mean, how do I clean the sensor - carefully. Using a blower and a loupe to see what I'm doing (there are specialized tools, some of which include swabs - use those only when all else fails). To clean the lens (which I do at home before any shoot) I use a specialized lens cleaning cloth, sometimes with a special lens cleaning solution. You should examine (and clean) both the front and back elements. I hope this is the information you were looking for.
Hello Mr Maarten, i'm thinking to get this camera, for in my bag, and backpack for daily use, would you suggest the 18-55mm lens for all purpose, landscape portrait, city and so on, or would you choose a 18-200 mm lens for this situation? thanks !
I know this thing shoots at 60fps,, but how do exactly shoot in full manual on this thing? because changing the aperture is troublesome. Furthermore, when I do change the iso or shutter speed in live view, would it really change it or not. ( why I ask is because the Nikon d5300 had a problem where you can see the changes of the image in live view by fiddling with the iso and shutter speed, but after you take the shot. The shot would be very different.)
Hi Maarten, I have tried to use my 70/300 lens but when taking a bird shot, they are all blurred, I had it on Automatic? Not sure if you can help me please!
Maarten Heilbron thanks Maarten, One of the problems I had until I watched your video was, not turning the front dial and most pics were out of focus. Now because I have watched your video, I have now sorted out that very annoying problem. Thanks again for your help.
Sure, either, both - depends a little on what you're shooting. If you're shooting portraits, the 50mm is usually a better choice (85mm is the full frame standard) as you won't be as close to the subject, and you'll be able to get a nicer background (as the area will be smaller).
Hi, I'm about to purchase this camera, but I can't decide if I should be getting the 70-300 zoom with it, or not. I currently own a Nikon DX, AF-S Nikkor 55-200 mm 1:4-5.6G ED lens from my old Nikon D50 camera, and I was wondering if it's compatible with the D3400. It's around 10 years old I think, and I'm not sure if works (especially for recording videos) with the new one. Also if I think about it, only $100 extra for a new 70-300 lens, it's kinda a good deal (I guess). But if my old one works perfectly, then probably I won't get a new one. What do you think? Also what's a good budget friendly wide lens for the D3400? I want to photograph landscapes. Thanks, Camelia
I'd stick with the 55-200, yes, it's compatible - neither of these lens is great for video. Of course, it is a good deal, and if you can sell the 55-200 for the same $100, I'd do that. Budget friendly wide lens ... I dont know, but wirecutter (thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/#the-wide-angle-lens) recommends the Sigma 10-20. In general I'm aligned with their recommendations. Hope this helps.
Does anyone use the old non motorized ( Less expensive) manual Nikkor FX lenses with success or does the camera not operate with them not making electrical contact?
There are many more powerful and expensive lenses offered by Nikon and third parties. You can find them listed on Nikon's site, or at camera dealers web sites: bhpho.to/2leihdk
That depends on which field of view you prefer for the kinds of photos you're taking. I like the recommendations made by thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
I had a Canon PC 1304 and I was able to catch the fool moon so close that you could almost touch with your hands, now I Own a Nikon D3400 with a 70-300 lens zoom all the way out and results are very poor, please help! Am I doing something wrong.
That's too little information for me to understand what might be the difference, unless the lens on the PC 1304 extended to more than 300mm, the most likely issue.
Mr. Heilbron, I thanked you so much for your informative, straight forward, and easy to understand for a non English native speaker like me. These video helped me able to properly use a camera, and now I cannot even believe that the pictures I took were mine, without you I wouldn't know how fun it is to take a photo with camera
Always nice to read that viewers appreciate my videos, thanks for the kind words.
Boston ❤️ Massachusetts
Seven years old and still very helpful. Always enjoy your videos. My Nikon has been with me in China, Vietnam and Cambodia. Your videos helped with thousands of (I feel) beautiful images. Thanks Maarten.
Great to hear! Always nice to know my videos are appreciated and helpful.
I enjoy this as well, I Truly hope he does more in the Future 🙏
I truly like the Nikon D-3400 as well, other than having other Cameras I just like this little Gem 💎
I hope he does one Video a month on the D-3400 i would surely enjoy, I will truly follow if he considers the task.!,
I am a new patron.of the Art of photography
Boston Massachusetts
Maarten, Thank you for sharing your knowledge of the camera and lenses. I'm a noob with the D3400 and sincerely appreciate your instruction style. My college professor directed me to your training to help with learning my specific D3400 camera, I'm very thankful for her guidance...thanks, Professor Kit!
I always appreciated viewer comments with kind words - a pleasure to read yours. I'm also thankful to your professor for recommending my channel, please extend my thanks to him.
This video made up for the 100 other attempts i made in answering some basic questions about this kit. SUBSCRIBED, thank you.
So glad you found my channel worthwhile, thanks for subscribing.
Probably one of the best lens reviews I have ever watched. I feel actually confident about purchasing this lens now. Thanks for the breakdown.
Glad to hear you found it useful, thanks for commenting.
Your videos are always so thorough and well presented. Thank you.
Very kind of you to say, thanks for taking the time to comment.
Martin very helpful videos. Just purchased a D3400 and you have taught me so much as I delve into the new world of digital photography.
It’s always rewarding to hear from a viewer who has found my work useful, thanks!
I would want to know how far you are standing from the home with the wreath. That seems to be an important piece of information. Across the street, a block away, an acre away, a mile away? But thanks for a great and clear and concise explanation and comparison of the 75 mm - 300 mm lens.
Thanks for the kind words, always appreciated. I was across the street.
Thank you for that , the best informative straight forward review on the d3400 lenses ever .
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for taking the time to comment.
This is the first ever video after so much of searching for the right video I stumble upon for the technical understanding. Thanks just subscribed.
Thanks - both for your kind words and your subscription. Glad to hear you found what you were looking for.
Hello Maarten, thank you for such an informative video. I recently purchased this model with both the 18-55 and the 70-300 lenses, and this video was a great place for me to start!
Thanks for the kind words, always nice to hear that viewers found my videos useful.
Thank you for making this highly informative video. I am looking forward to watching more of your videos.
Thanks for your kind words, appreciated.
Hi, thank you for the detailed explanation. I have D3400 with both lenses default n 70-300.
Just wanted to know are there any telescopic lense compatible with D3400??
There may be, I'm not aware of them.
Awesome video!!! Never saw such an information one. Please keep making them
That's my plan. Thanks for your kind words.
Wow I am thinking of buying this camera for my Art projects How does it capture Shadows and details even from a distance? As a Artist it is more rewarding to me to be able to find subjects or items to paint or draw in a sketch. I just hope the learning curve is not to bad what do you think?
It's ability to capture detail is good, as the sensor is APS-C sized (Full frame would be better). However, a great deal depends on the lens, the lighting and the settings you use.
The camera offers many modes from fully automated to completely manual, so you should be able to find settings that allow you to concentrate on your artistic/creative vision while the camera handles the technical details.
That said, if you are interested in maximizing shadow details, it would be best to familiarize yourself with the dynamic range adjustments available.
Hello Sir! this video was more informative to understand how lens work, when to choose which lense for the purpose. Thanks for the video. I got the D3400 for the budget point, can you suggest a 50 mm lense alternative to original Nikon considering the price to get lower and without comprising the quality and performance equivalent/close to original Nikon lense in terms of features. My requirement is for photography for occasional ceremonies and few out door camping, I love to have back ground blur and more detail on the people. Thanks in advance if you can answer.
Have a look for a used one.
x1.5 for everyone but canon who are at x1.6
Yes, thanks - sorry about that. Always nice to know my viewers are looking out for me and keeping me on the straight and narrow.
Hi very informative video, thanks. I have a doubt, I started photography with d3400 18-55mm kits only. But now when I got some chance to took photo with zoom lens 70-300mm, I would like to buy a lens for my own. But my confusion is does the zoom lens actually required? Can we take pics with kit lens? Is there difference in sharpness and quality of kit lens and zoom lens when it comes to portrait and landscape?
I heard zoom lens are mostly used for wildlife and sports photography.
I am but confused that should I go for a zoom lens as photography is my hobby not profession and I would like to improve my photography skills as well?
Can you please share your thoughts on this, it will be very helpful.
Thanks
I appreciate your kind words, thanks for commenting. The difference is primarily (as you likely noticed) the focal length (or field of view) - how close you can get to far away objects. As for quality, the price of a lens (with the exception of some prime lenses) is usually a good indication of their quality. The kit lens for the D3400 does not deliver all of the quality the sensor is capable of capturing.
Thank you for this video! So informative. I am looking to get a portrait lens and considering the 50mm 1.8, also considering the 40mm f/2.8g for some Micro photography(newborn mostly) I am reading that the 40mm can be used for portraits as well so I’m wanting to know if you think it’s better to get both. I have a D3400 and am wanting to move up from the kit lens.
I do appreciate knowing that my videos are useful, thanks for commenting. I'd get and use the 50mm - I think you'll find it good for your purpose and you won't need the 40mm.
love this explanation, greeting from Nicaragua Huge Fan! here
Always nice to hear from my fans in Nicaragua. Happy 2017!
Thank you for the video. Very helpful. I am wondering if I can use my Tamron AF Aspherical XR LD [IF] 28-300mm 1:3.5-6.3 Macro 62 lens that I currently use with my Nikon D70 camera. I am figuring it will work since it is an F mount on the D70 and it was made for F mount cameras. I'm very excited to find all your videos so I can learn more.
I'm happy to hear you found it useful. Yes, in general F-mount lenses are compatible with all Nikon bodies. Older lenses won't do autofocus or auto aperture (exposure) - but if you can overcome those limitations, they will work. And thank you for your kind words. The description contains links to the other videos I produced about the Nikon D3400, but you'll also find reviews of other Nikon models in a playlist.
Thank you Maarten. I will be watching all your videos. I'm leaning toward a little higher model, maybe a 5600. I do a lot of manual focus, even though I can set on auto. I just like doing it. Thank you for your help. I truly appreciate it.
It's always my pleasure, glad to hear you're finding my videos useful.
What is the difference in picture quality with VR and NON VR? It seems an extended lens in NON VR would be at risk for shake from the cick of the camera or just a shaky hand of the photographer and VR would help to eliminate that.
If you need a slower shutter speed that is the difference.
Thank you for the review on lenses for the D-3400, I truly have fun with this oldie.!
Please 🙏 keep reviewing this old Camera there are many beginners that will follow, Again ThankYou for your review it was very comprehensive. and you make it easy to understand.!
Please 🙏 still do a monthly review on this Camera no matter how old.!
● I checked liked
● Watched B& H Comercial
● and The U.V. light
Comercial completely through, so give you kudos,,, Remember there are many out there that you can help on a modest investment to the D-3400
You'll be helping a lot of Amateurs that Truly need your help.! And you are extremely wonderful on teaching,
Again Please don't STOP showing this old Diamond in the ruff, Your followers will follow.! Great review, Even if
7 years old, viewers are still watching this old Video such as I --
Boston Massachusetts
Thanks, a pleasure to read your kind words - but please note that I recorded this video when the D3400 was new!
Many thanks for your videos regarding the Nikon d3400, they were very helpful, they are excellently made and very well explained. Thank you very much again. Greetings from Argentina.
Hi ! I am want to buy the D3400. I was wondering which would be a better choice for lens , the AFP 18 - 55 kit lens or should i exchange it for a 50 mm f2.8 prime . I am new to DSLR photography and just want to stick to one lens for the time being .. would appreciate your valuable input ..
Maarten!! another great video as usual. I am a photo journalist and an indie cinematographer.. Just like to watch your videos :) quick tip for those who uses these lenses for video; if you don't have a cine lens, use multi colored sticker strip to mark your focus on the barrel so you can zoom in and out between your desired objects smoothly. follow focus add on will come in handy, too. Once you get used to the custom, it's easy. Just my humble opinion .. Thank you - regards from Boston ..
Hello Boston (fond memories ...) and thanks for the kind words and useful comments. I use masking tape and a thin line marker - but on these lenses, it's only effective for zoom. Trying to do follow or rack focus with these two lenses can be frustrating as it has to be by eye and the markings are not reliable - but that's true of any lens with auto focus by wire. I do find that the better Nikon lenses with the focus distance marking to be simpler to manage. The focus distance (although managed with a clutch) is at least reasonably clearly defined, so as long as you don't push against the boundary, the markings should stay pretty close.
Maarten Heilbron good to know. I don't own either of these but I understand what you mean. thanks :)
What a gentleman, profound thanks for your advice and time.
How kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
I bought a D3400 today. I used an F3 back in the old days. When you pulled out the 35mm film it gave me a sense of nostalgia. Thanks for that and your vids.
Always my pleasure, thanks again.
The ability to change aperture in Live View with the AF-P lenses is reason enough to prefer them over the earlier kit lenses. But, Nikon really needs to make the ability to change aperture in Live View a feature of each new body, not each new lens. But I really like the D3400, very nice grip, light weight, battery life and IQ are class leading.
While I'm in complete agreement, I feel that there is something about the lens technology that doesn't allow it on those models - but I have no technical insight to back that up. On the other hand, Nikon (more than most) is very prone to arbitrarily removing features from less expensive models even if it is only firmware.
***** That is true, Nikon like Canon, is very careful not to cannibalize sales of its higher end models by making fully loaded low end models. Can't really blame them. But I know from my D800 and its lack of aperture changing in Live View, that it must be some technical problem with all the bodies that has yet to be solved. Cheers.
Wait - it's not a limitation of the body, it's a limitation of the lens. Some lenses (I thought it was ones with E in the name) as I learned in my review of the D5500 (ruclips.net/video/esc0PNAh9-k/видео.html) just need the right lens - in that case the DX16-80E. But it seems to be supported on the 70-300 DX VR as well, although not the kit. The D3400 body can do it, with the right lens.
***** Good point. Now I'm wondering (maybe you know) if the AF-P 18-55 kit lens on other Nikon bodies like the D5500 or D7100 will allow you to change the aperture in Live View? Thanks, good channel.
My Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 allows Live View aperture adjustment for stills (Manual Movie Settings "On), but not while shooting video. Is this odd? Also Maarten, I think it would be nice if you provided an overview of available lenses for this camera that cost less than, say, US $500. Not full reviews, just tell everyone what's out there. If you do, don't leave out the Samyang/Rokinon primes. They're great values, and even allow the camera to control shutter speed and aperture with modern Nikon bodies.
Sorry.. But i didn't understood how to change the aperture in live view mode... Can you please elaborate?
Maybe this video will help: ruclips.net/video/dg3cFs8OTd8/видео.html
Another question please: from non-photographers view: "can 18-300 lens replace both 18-55 and 70-300 legs requirement?" Your experienced answer please.
Yes, but with a reduction in available apertures and some loss in quality. Otherwise, you will have all of the focal lengths represented by the other two lenses.
Many thanks for your valuable reply. "Loss of quality" is the fact as learn from what you said. 👍🏻😀
What is a good black and white filter, and about how much would it cost.
Built into the camera, no cost: ruclips.net/video/3rl5izM-7Jo/видео.html
Thank you for your very informative videos. I am a beginner and just made the decision to purchase the D3400 over the D3300. I purchased the bundle that included the 15-55mm VR and the 70-300mm [Non-VR] lenses. My question is with the 70-300mm telephoto lens which for some reason does not have VR. What are the implications of a Non-VR zoom lens for a beginner like myself? The bundle with the two lenses was much more advantageous to purchase. For some reason the D3000 bundle includes both kit lenses with VR, but the D3400 did not. This created a tough decision on deciding between the D3300 and D3400 Bundles. Thank you for all your help.
Thank for for taking the time to share your kind words. The lack of VR, which saves a few dollars on that lens, shouldn't affect much. In low light situations you'll be faced with the choice of a higher ISO or using a tripod. The VR version will allow you to shoot at a slightly slower shutter speed. Those bundle choices make me crazy - but it's always worth negotiating with your dealer.
Thanks! Just what I needed to know. Not much aperture on that thing but you make do with what you got. I guess you can't do wildlife with it.
Not much aperture on what thing?
@@MaartenHeilbron the 70-300 kit lens.
Right, it would certainly be nice to have a wider aperture. Luckily Nikon does make other zoom lenses with better aperture ranges.
@@MaartenHeilbron even the budget segment lens costs much. This 70-300mm lens is the same as a watchman's fairly paid salary in India. So we must accept that we must learn to live with these lenses what we can afford. The pros can afford those expensive glass as they are earning from it. Many studios here use point and shoot for small passport size or postcard size photo. D3100 or D5100 for wedding photos using kit lens. Very few use pro grade lens and body. But yes, we can afford few cheap but excellent prime lenses such as 35 and 50mm. That makes the photos turn out much better.
@@Dave_en Thanks for sharing your budget insights.
U look like a older version of the guy that plays the terminator, it's a compliment
hehe, thanks I appreciate the compliment.
Nice video helped me understand some things.
Thanks, I am very glad to hear that I've increased your knowledge .
hello sir, that was quite helpful. do u suggest getting both the 18-55mm & 70-300mm lense kit or just the 18-55mm one?
please do respond, as it would help me make an informed decision. thanks in anticipation. :)
Thanks for the kind words, always appreciated. I suggest getting just the 18-55. I recognize it's bargain, particularly with the kit, but I'll bet you'll rarely use it - unless you're doing a lot of nature/bird photography or your children play sports.
Thank you so much sir. The information you gave was much helpful and i thank you for your time, i really appreciate it. I hope you have a great day. 😊
i am just a beginner, but your videos are so helpful, please keep the great work going.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
Absolutely wonderful
Thank you very much, I appreciate the kind words.
Marry glass, date bodies.
What a cute way to say that!
I am new to photography and trying to Learn from your videos about my d3400. Many many helpful hints so far but my question is, How did you get zoomed in that close to the snowman in the still not the video? Everytime I try to zoom in that close (I'm taking closeup stills of jewelry and art) it refuses to focus or beep so I can shoot. I understand the relationship between iOS, ss, and aperture now as far as lighting but not sure why I can't get super close. It may be that I have left the AF on. Is that the only piece I'm missing for the close ups and blurred background? I really had just decided I had made a mistake buying this camera until I found your videos. Hoping you can shed some light on this for me
Thanks for the kind words - and that's an excellent question. I'm always shooting closeups of camera parts, so can completely sympathize - it's a challenge. Not sure which lens you are using, but check the specifications to see how close it can focus - the subject may be too close. For that kind of work, I really recommend a macro lens which gets in much closer.
Lenses do have autofocus trouble with very close objects, so I would use manual focus ( ruclips.net/video/KTPpDY8H7DE/видео.html) and just turn the ring until the distance is as close to the camera as possible. Then move the object until it's in focus. Hope this helps.
Great quote, I am adding your words to my quotes collection.
Thanks for the video. I am just starting out and have the D3400 with the 18-35mm kit lens and the 70-300mm.
I want to focus on macro photography and I recently purchased a set of 3 extension tubes (more like rings...)
The markings on each are 12mm, 20mm Digital, and 36mm N-AF. I wanted to try out the inexpensive option before buying a Nikon macro (micro?) lens.
For the extensions, should I use only one, or a combination? The photos I have taken are a little blurry as the depth of field seems narrower with the tubes. Should I limit my expectations with these?
Is it common for a great looking macro shot found on Google, etc to actually be a composite of several images because of the depth?
Even a small house spider that I captured had its back legs out of focus.
And lastly...is there a macro lens you recommend?
Thanks again for the great video.
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. You may use the extension tubes singly or in combination. It's typical that it's hard to focus (it's hard even with dedicated macro lenses), and it's typical to have a very, very small depth of field. You can try to add more light to enable a smaller aperture for a larger depth of field, or, as you suggest, you can take multiple images (this is called focus stacking) and combine the images in photoshop. And yes, it is possible that a great looking macro shot is a composite or focus stacked image. While a more expensive lens is always better, I'd also recommend a focal length in the 50-80mm range - with a smaller focal length you'll be so on top of the subject that the lens will cause a shadow.
Hope this helps.
thanks Maarten, good video. Quick question, should I invest in a prime lens? (the camera came with the kit lens 18-55) I was looking at the Nikkor 50mm 1.8G and Nikkor 35mm 1.8G but with the 1.5 DX crop factor the 50mm will be more less 75? right? so, is it better to buy the 35mm for street and portrait photography? thx. Gregoz
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. The 35mm will be more versatile - with crop the 50mm won't be very useful when shooting on the street. The 35mm will be fine for portraits, but 50 would be better. You could use the kit for street and the 50 for portraits ... my issue with the kit is that the quality is quite a bit less than the sensor in the D3400, which you will appreciate the second you take a photo with a better lens.
thank you, that's what I thought, I am not really happy with the kit lens, it's not very sharp. I bought Sigma 70-300mm for wildlife and night photography but the lens is very narrow, not good at all for the street shots. So, I might get the 35mm 1.8G, it's the same price as the 50mm and I don't do too much of the portrait photos anyway. thanks again, Gregoz
always happy to help
Which camera is better Canon 200d or Nikon D3400 ? And yes i am interested in potraits , landscape and street photography which lens would you suggest for Nikon d3400 ?
They are fairly similar, so choose the one you prefer based on style, cost and hand fit. Wirecutter has some excellent Nikon (and Canon) lens suggestions.
Great Nikon videos. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Do you have any Nikon A900 videos? Thank you
Thanks for the kind words. Nope, sorry.
hi, I was wondering what lens to choose I have a few options because I want to buy my first lens for my new Nikon d3400 and I am on a budget. Which one fits and is the best overall, the D3400 will be my first DSLR I had a point and shoot before this but if the sun isn't out the camera doesn't take good photographs. Well, the lenses are: Nikon Nikkor AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G Lens, Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG Macro and, Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro (Nikon).
Thanks for all the great videos btw
Thanks for the kind words, appreciated.
Is it safe to assume you already have the kit lens? I'm not sure what you're planning to shoot - but it sounds like you're planning to shoot wildlife or birds with the lenses you mention. All three of those are fairly similar in capability and (I suspect) quality. None are bad and having not tried them, I can't say if one is better than another. However, unless you're shooting on a sunny day in full light, you may find that the F5.6 aperture at full zoom to be limiting.
@@MaartenHeilbron I don't have a kit lens yet but I am planning on buying a 50mm and a 70-300, I would love to shoot some wildlife and birds. What would you suggest? I am planning on buying some lenses second hand because I have a pretty small budget. Would you suggest buying the kit lens first? Thanks again for all your helpfull video's
I think the kit lens doesn't do the camera justice. Buy the 50mm. The 70-300 is a good choice for wildlife because of its reach, but it requires sunny days (or a tripod) because the aperture closes as you zoom in.
Thx for your detailed explaination!
Always my pleasure, thanks for the kind words.
Still enjoying my D3400 HOWEVER I am getting an R11 in the view finder.
Changed lenses.....camera still seems to take photos BUT that doesn't go
away. Some have said its a full buffer...........but its all the time
now, even when I first turn on camera. Even did a reset....any
suggestions? Thanks in advance
I don't have any. Have you contacted Nikon? Searched with Google?
thank you
Love your videos--super helpful for getting started with our new d3400. I've been looking into getting a uv filter to protect our lenses (which are the 2 you show in the video). I understand (I think) that I'd want 55 and 58 mm diameter filters, but the other options are a bit overwhelming. It sounds like multicoat, thin, brass (vs aluminum) filters are best, but at that price point I worry I'm buying more filter than is really necessary for those lenses. It also looks like amount of light transmitted is another factor to cconsider... How do you recommend chosing a protective filter?
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. The filter diameter should match the lens (so if the lenses are 55mm and 58mm, those are the filter diameters you need). I would simply buy the least expensive ones that a reputable camera store sells, and ignore the snake oil and precious metals that are applied in an attempt at product differentiation and increased margins.
Good Explanation,Keep up.👍✌
Thanks, it's kind of you to say.
Also would you recommend this camera, will it last in your opinion? 🙂thanks again
It will last as long as you take care of it and don't see a newer model with features that you must have.
cool thanks
always my pleasure
For portraits what should I go for my D3400
1. 85mm 1.8
2. 50mm 1.8
I currently have the kit n 35mm lens
Both are good choices, the 85mm is the traditional portrait choice - but on a DX body, it will be a little tight, the 50mm would be the equivalent for the DX sensor.
i have seen some of your videos today about lumix and sony camer
you provide most indepth and to the point review
my question is which camera you used to shoot this video??
That's very kind. This series of videos was recorded with the Fuji X-T2.
this is awesome, thank you!
Thank you very much for your kind words, appreciated.
really good video.looking forward for more videos n guides of Nikon 3400.thank you
Thanks - at this point, only one more - about the SnapBridge software. I had to return the camera to Nikon.
hi .what is the best lens for nikon D3400 to take wedding photos?
I'm flattered you would ask me, and could give some general advice, but I've never shot a wedding, so really have no experience to assist, sorry.
Maarten Heilbron . oh OK thanks anyway..!:)
Great piece of information, could you please share the difference between
"AF-P DX Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR Lens" and
"AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon ".
AF-P (pulse) is a newer focussing motor design, the AF-S is older and somewhat noisier. A G lens does not have an aperture ring, and the aperture is set with a motor by adjusting settings on the camera. (The older D lenses have a manual aperture ring). VR (vibration reduction) is Nikon's optical stabilization technology. Not all lenses are compatible with all cameras - you'll find a compatibility chart at Nikon's web site for the camera you own.
I have nikon d 3400 only
Understood.
Hi this video was great! I would like to request for a similar review of the Nikon D3500 and the lenses for it. Thank you in advance.
Thanks for your kind words. I've asked for a review unit from Nikon but it hasn't yet materialized.
Same basic camera. Only a few minor differences.
@@Warrior_Resisting_Colonialism Thanks for your assistance.
You are so smart, thank you for helping me!
I'm so glad to hear that my videos are useful, thanks for taking the time to comment.
Sri your videos are very good.
What a nice comment, thanks very much.
Great video!
I have a specific followup question: Would you say that replacing the kit lens with the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM makes sense for sharper photos, particularly for someone mostly photographing landscapes who still prefers travelling with only one multi purpose lens, or is such good glass wasted on an entry level body, so that I should upgrade to say a D7200 first?
Also, is the lack of image stabilisation in the sigma lens a deal breaker if virtually all of my shots are hand held (on the go while hiking), though usually in broad daylight?
I would support your plan - the deficiencies of the D3400 are in the features and control set, not in image quality. I'm not familiar with that lens, but it sounds like than should be a good combo. Upgrade bodies only if you know that there's a specific feature you're missing that you need.
As for stabilization, it's for photographers with long lenses with smaller apertures shooting in relatively low light situations.
Maarten Heilbron I formed the plan to get it because reviewers everywhere hail it as the best walkabout lens ever made for Nikon DX. However, reviews rarely talk about real world usage like the impact of the mentioned missing stabilisation in context with landscape photos. So thank you for taking the time to clear that up! From all the hype that's being made around tech like Panasonic's dual I.S. and so on I got the impression that shooting handheld without stabilisation is generally a bad idea.
Always my pleasure. Stabilization is only an issue when shutter speeds are low and gets more necessary with long lenses.
thanks for the great info. have you ever tried shooting macro images by reverse mounting the kit lens?
An interesting thought. I have not.
the results seem pretty astounding, even with the 18-55mm nikkor kit lenses. A $10 ring vs a $200 dedicated macro lens? cheap enough that i have a reverse ring on the way for my D3300
Keep me posted on the results.
What will be the good lens for landscape photography on Nikon D3400 asap
I think that you'll find some expert guidance here, with more detail and insight than i can provide: thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
Sir, so happy to have found your channel.i want to purchase a d3400, what would u suggest me ?Buy it along with the dual lenses ie .,18-55 and 70-300 or just the 18-55mm to begin with.
I'm also happy you found my channel. I have no reason to talk you out of purchasing a D3400 - it's a good choice for an entry-level camera. I would not choose either of those lenses, as I find the quality to be less than the sensor can deliver. I would suggest the 16-70, but if that's an option that's too expensive (but remember that you can use that lens for a long time), I would recommend that you purchase one or two prime lenses with large apertures. I do like the recommendations made by wirecutter.
thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
Maarten Heilbron thanks a lot for the reply. Will Nikon 50mm f/1.8g serve my purpose ? This seems to fit my budget as well.
I'm not sure what your purpose is, but that seems like a good lens for portraits.
Mostly I'm doing studio photography. So, should I get D3400 ? How does it performs at studio photography ?
What camera are you using now? The D3400 is a bit basic, but perfectly suitable - however you'd probably like a lens better than the kit lens. Are you planning to do tethered shooting?
Sir, I was wondering if I could get some advice on a dslr purchase. I am planning on buying a refurbished Nikon D3400 dslr from Kaleidoscope electronics and I have two main questions: First what, if any, hesitations would you have about buying a refurbished camera, and second there is a package option that includes a AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm lens (non VR) and it seems to be a good deal on the lens, but I was wondering if you thought it would be worth the money for photographing landscapes and cityscapes. I would imagine the large zoom would be nice but since it doesn't have VR I though it might be too ambitious for myself as a beginner to use. Thanks for your help and I really appreciate the awesome videos!
Thank you for your kind words, they are appreciated.
I have no idea about refurbs, but it depends on your confidence in the dealer and the warranty they provide.
Not sure that's a great lens for landscapes or cityscapes - I'd prefer something 50mm or less. And read my reply to Tracey (earlier today) about VR. Finally, I don't think any lens is "ambitious", beginner or no.
Very nice and kind man :) Thank you for a very informative video.
That's kind of you to say, thanks for taking the time to comment, appreciated.
@@MaartenHeilbron I have a question for you (I figured since you replied to my message, you are probably checking them often, and not like others) So I'm traveling next month and I don't want to take to much of my gear. I'm using Nikon D7500 and hoping to take just one or two lenses. Do you think that AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED will do just fine if I plan on taking pictures of landscape and everyday life? Or you would recommend that I would take something else for general photography? I guess I want to know really if this lens would be ok for taking pictures of people?
I do make it a point to reply to all relevant and civil questions and comments. It's a great landscape and architecture lens, and even for food, but not much else.
In general, it's the 16/24-70/105 range that most consider a useful travel walk-about lens. I can recommend the Nikkor 16-80 as an excellent travel companion.
If you just want to add one small/inexpensive lens to the travel kit, I'd take a 50mm, it's a nice people/portrait lens.
Thank you for recommendation. I would also take my nifty 50 along with me.
Always happy to help.
Sir will U please explain the utility of a 18-55 kit lense set at 50mm focal length and that of a 50mm prime lense to compare the field of view i.e to take a large group photo covering each member. Are they same?
At 50mm the field of view will be approximately the same. These numbers are rarely exact. I suspect for a large group, the 18mm position on the kit lens will be better able to capture them all.
Very help full video, I need a zoom lens for my Nikon D5300, may i select this lens(Afp 70 to 300ed vr)? is it long lasting capability. What u think about this plastic made lens mount. Tight budget. Thx
I appreciate your kind words, thanks. That's a reasonable choice on a tight budget. The only thing to consider with a plastic lens mount is wear and tear - if you're a reasonably careful photographer and take care of your equipment it should last. I wouldn't recommend it for working photographers who are constantly switching lenses. What I do find (and I'm not judging on this specific combination) is that the plastic mount is often not quite as secure and tight a fit.
Hey Maarten, After having enough fun with the D3400, would you be so kind to "touch" an A6500? I am especially interested in learning from you the Sony touch screen. Sony should have come to you and ask you to make tutorial videos for the A6500. If I were a marketing manager, I'd do that, sure.
Yes, thank, enough fun. Just waiting patiently for Sony Canada to have one to lend me.
Hi Maarten. Could you do a video on lenses for the Nikon D3300 thanks.
It would be the same as this video.
Maarten Heilbron Thanks a lot. Happy new year!!!
always my pleasure
sir please suggest any chepest gimble for nikon d3400, and also settings while shooting vedios with it
I honestly don't know which would be the cheapest. However, I suggest that the cheapest will not provide good results. I've just started shotoing wit the Ronin-S, and that seems like a good unit to me (although I'm not using it wth the D3400, so can't really judge how appropriate it is for that size/weight).
thank you very much sir.... for giving me a rply,
if u have any idea about which gimble is suitable for d3400.. so then suggest me I'll buy it for shooting... and please tell me about vedio settings and with which lence i shoot vedio for better results.. i have a nikon 50mm 1.8g prime lence, 18/55 basic lence also... please give me some suggestions
Always happy to help. Other than the Ronin-S, I have no suggestions for gimbals. In general I find them all somewhat difficult to configure and complicated to get good results. The Ronin-S seems better than the rest, and it's slightly larger to accommodate larger DSLR sized cameras. For video, try this: ruclips.net/video/4eSCnLqAB6k/видео.html
huge thanks sir... your vedios r very helpful for me and everyone ... as a beginner i learn lot of things from your vedios and also thanks for sharing valuable time and information...... you r the inspiration of every beginner 😊😊😊🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫
Thanks for your kind words, I'm always happy to help.
Nice explanation :)
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words.
Hello sir
I have a kit lens for my D3400
(Nikkor DX VR AF-P 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6G)
Now i wish to upgrade the lens, perhaps 70-300 range,
Which lens specifications do you recommend?
The one in the video itself?
Also sir, in low price range than nikkor lens
Which brand & compatible type do you suggest for my D3400.
Would be really great if you kindly revert.
Thanks a lot.
Video is very informative.
What are you trying to accomplish with the new lens?
Hello Sir.
I have Nikon D3400.
I want blurry background and sharpness.good Bookeh
Which lense will be best.
Nikon 70 300mm
Or
Yongnuo 50mm???
Both can work. You may have an easier time with the Yonguo as its aperture opens to F1.8 - but at the 300mm end, the Nikon should also provide a pleasing bokeh.
Hello Maarten. Thanks for your channel. There is still a question I'm having difficulty with : if you take "similar" cameras, i.e., same make, APSC, DSLR, similar pixels, use the same lens on each, say 50mm 1.8, ignore "details" sur as Wifi or not, flip screen, what is going to be the difference in image quality and/or shooting experience between the different cameras in a different price range ?? If I'm not clear, here's an example : what will be the image quality difference and shooting experience difference between a Nikon d3300/3400, a d5500/5600 & a d7100/7200 ?
And why is the d3300 always referred to as a beginner's camera, for instance, if (IF !) the image quality can be as good as on a d7100?
Thanks a lot for your response !
In peace and friendship, Eric
I appreciate the kind words, thanks. I think the D3K series are usually referred to as "entry-level" - which primarily refers to the price point. It's a beginner camera only inasmuch as it's a good choice for someone who is not yet fully committed to photography either as a career or a passion.
Nikon sensors tend to vary in quality over time (that is, in general, 2017 sensors are better than 2014 sensors), and not by model number. As models get upgraded at different times, they are sometimes out of sync, so a lesser model may get a newer processor before a more expensive one does. The primary differences between the 3K, 5K and 7K series are the quality of the construction of the body, and the features and functions that are offered. If you want a better (or larger) body, more and better control, or more features, you'll end up paying for it.
Hope this helps.
So, in fact, what you are saying is that indeed it is possible to get as good an image - even on a regular basis - with a D3K as with a D7K ? But the latter is more heftily built and will have more controls immediately to hand ?
Thanks, Maarten, very much.
Eric
Given the same lens, image quality will be the same - as long as you are dealing with the same generation sensor.
Thank you, Maarten.
nice explanation sir. i have nikon d5500 with kit lens and i want to buy lens what lens is good for bokeh thank you
Have you tried the kit lens and find it unsuitable? Here are some tips: ruclips.net/video/FgpHdMxv2rg/видео.html
I assume you'd like to take portraits with soft defocussed backgrounds. Look for a lens in the 35-50mm FX range or 50-85DX range with a large aperture - say F2. or less. That should perform suitably for that need. More expensive lenses will provide a more pleasing bokeh pattern. Here are some tips I find useful: thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
I am learning photography as a hobby. Would you recommend D3400? If yes then is it OK to start with 18-55 mm kit lens? I don't want to spend too much money but want something to get started.
If not D3400 then which other entry level DSLR would you recommend along with the lens?
Yes, yes. This is a fine starting point.
Hello Maarten,
Thank you for these amazing videos !
I am planning to buy 1 or 2 lens for my 3400
For events and portraits - i checked 85mm 1.8g (may not be suitable for indoor) , 50mm 1.4g and 50 mm 1.8g , could you please suggest which one would be better with this camera model ?
and was looking for a budget lens for wildlife - Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 70 - 300 mm f/4.5 - 6.3G ED VR Lens or Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55 - 300 mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Lens ...
They would all be fine. The 50mm 1.4 has the best ability to provide a defocussed background, and with the DX sensor, the standard portrait focal length. You will find the 85 to be a little close, which, as you suggest, is particularly a problem indoors.
Maarten Heilbron Thank you :)
always happy to help
A bit off topic, I guess, but this is a question I haven't found an answer to anywhere.
Does a 35mm FX lens on a dx body produce the same field of view ( hence the same image) as a 35mm dx lens on a dx body?
I thought that answer was everywhere. Yes, they both produce the same field of view - which would be the equivalent of a 50mm lens on an FX body.
Hello Maarten,
I am planning to buy hood for AF-P DX NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G ED VR lens, But I am confused which one I should buy and not sure about the hood size.
Could you please let me know the hood size.
The HB-36 hood is supplied with that lens.
please show in detail how i find bulb mode on this camera , then timed mode for long exposure thank you
Turn the mode dial to M. Set shutter speed to 'bulb" See the manual, p. 98
I've got a question. I'm interested to buy this camera with 70-300 FX lens (for 450mm telezoom for natural photography) which doesn't have autofocus motor. Now, is there any autofocus adapter in the market which can give me autofocus in this camera - lens combination? Suggestion please.
I've got a reply. How have you concluded that this lens doesn't have AF? According to the Nikon site, it does: en.nikon.ca/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/af-p-nikkor-70-300mm-f%252f4.5-5.6e-ed-vr.html
Thank you very much sir!
Hi sir! What do you think if I buy sigma 17-50mm with d3400?? :D thank you!
This sounds like a good, inexpensive, all-purpose solution. Always my pleasure.
It's perfect!! I bought it yesterday. Thank you very much :)
sir i shot with nikon 3400 with kit lens some time i need to focus on my model and some thing with it but when i shot only 1 thing is in focus plz help me with The setting .....
Maybe this video will help: ruclips.net/video/KTPpDY8H7DE/видео.html
Sri at last i choose nikon d3400. I do not wrist my manny. Nikon d3400 is a very good dslr . So sri thanks for thish video . Or sri hdr not supported nikon d3400?
Always happy to help.
Hi great video, I was wondering if you know if the d3400 would be able to do astro or very low light with the kit 18-55 lense? Thanks
Thank you for your kind words. Theoretically, it is, however, I would recommend a better lens, with a sharper image (the kit is terrible) and a larger aperture.
Nice video, but i have a question, if i get a AF lens for Nikon D3400, i will only be able to focus on manual, right? (sorry about my bad english, i'm brazillian XD)
Hello Brazil! I appreciate the kind words. A Nikon lens with AF in the name will be able to use both auto and manual focus modes on the D3400.
I bought this camera for Xmas and struggling to understand which lens had the f mount. I currently have the 18-55 could you tell me what bit of information suggests that a lens is f mount as I don't want to order the wrong one
Sorry if that wasn't clear - Nikkor lenses are all F-mount (except for some really, really old ones). Other manufacturers may specific Nikon mount of F-mount, which is pretty much an interchangeable term.
Maarten Heilbron thank you
what lense should i buy for steet & potrait photography for my d3400 or i should buy 70-300mm af-p?
That lens is too big to be inconspicuous or usable. I'd go with the street standard - like an FX 35 or 24mm (on this DX body those are approx 50mm and 35mm). And there's always good lens advice at wirecutter.
Do you how to clean between lens?
Not quite sure what you mean - if you mean, how do I clean the sensor - carefully. Using a blower and a loupe to see what I'm doing (there are specialized tools, some of which include swabs - use those only when all else fails).
To clean the lens (which I do at home before any shoot) I use a specialized lens cleaning cloth, sometimes with a special lens cleaning solution. You should examine (and clean) both the front and back elements.
I hope this is the information you were looking for.
Hello Mr Maarten,
i'm thinking to get this camera, for in my bag, and backpack for daily use, would you suggest the 18-55mm lens for all purpose, landscape portrait, city and so on, or would you choose a 18-200 mm lens for this situation?
thanks !
For general walkabout I'd go with the 18-55. Anything larger gets heavier and starts to look a little less touristy so attracts more attention.
thanks !
always my pleasure
I know this thing shoots at 60fps,, but how do exactly shoot in full manual on this thing? because changing the aperture is troublesome. Furthermore, when I do change the iso or shutter speed in live view, would it really change it or not. ( why I ask is because the Nikon d5300 had a problem where you can see the changes of the image in live view by fiddling with the iso and shutter speed, but after you take the shot. The shot would be very different.)
I think this video may help: ruclips.net/video/4eSCnLqAB6k/видео.html
Hi Maarten,
I have tried to use my 70/300 lens but when taking a bird shot, they are all blurred, I had it on Automatic? Not sure if you can help me please!
Try S and a faster shutter speed - say 1/500 and up.
Maarten Heilbron thanks Maarten,
One of the problems I had until I watched your video was, not turning the front dial and most pics were out of focus. Now because I have watched your video, I have now sorted out that very annoying problem. Thanks again for your help.
Always happy to help, thanks for the kind words.
Please sir suggest me which prime lens use in Crop Sensor camera ( 35mm or 50mm)
Sure, either, both - depends a little on what you're shooting. If you're shooting portraits, the 50mm is usually a better choice (85mm is the full frame standard) as you won't be as close to the subject, and you'll be able to get a nicer background (as the area will be smaller).
Thanks sir for suggestion
always my pleasure
Hi, I'm about to purchase this camera, but I can't decide if I should be getting the 70-300 zoom with it, or not. I currently own a Nikon DX, AF-S Nikkor 55-200 mm 1:4-5.6G ED lens from my old Nikon D50 camera, and I was wondering if it's compatible with the D3400. It's around 10 years old I think, and I'm not sure if works (especially for recording videos) with the new one.
Also if I think about it, only $100 extra for a new 70-300 lens, it's kinda a good deal (I guess). But if my old one works perfectly, then probably I won't get a new one. What do you think?
Also what's a good budget friendly wide lens for the D3400? I want to photograph landscapes.
Thanks,
Camelia
I'd stick with the 55-200, yes, it's compatible - neither of these lens is great for video. Of course, it is a good deal, and if you can sell the 55-200 for the same $100, I'd do that.
Budget friendly wide lens ... I dont know, but wirecutter (thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/#the-wide-angle-lens) recommends the Sigma 10-20. In general I'm aligned with their recommendations. Hope this helps.
It helped a lot! Thank you so much!
Always my pleasure.
Does anyone use the old non motorized ( Less expensive) manual Nikkor FX lenses with success or does the camera not operate with them not making electrical contact?
I'm certain that some do. Mechanical contact isn't needed if you use the lens manually.
What lens will get me a 24mega pixel image, becuase i know these lower cost lens only get about a 12 mega pixel image
Although better lenses will provide a sharper, clearer image all lenses provide a 24Mp image - that's a function of the sensor, not the lens.
Excpet these two lenses which you have already demonstrated is there more powerful lense that can be used with Nikon D3400.. Please reply
There are many more powerful and expensive lenses offered by Nikon and third parties. You can find them listed on Nikon's site, or at camera dealers web sites: bhpho.to/2leihdk
Which lens will be best in budget for Nikon D3400 35 mm f1.8 or 50 mm f1.8
That depends on which field of view you prefer for the kinds of photos you're taking. I like the recommendations made by thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
will there be a series like this for other manufactures like Canon?
Which model? Anything is possible ... I just need to find the time and have a little cooperation from the manufacturer.
like an entry camera like the Canon T6 for example
Let me see if Canon has one to loan - currently working on the 80D review.
Maarten Heilbron Can you please make a video on the canon 8OD Vs Canon 7OD?
Sorry, no. I just returned the 80D, and never did review the 70D. I'll post the 80D shortly.
I had a Canon PC 1304 and I was able to catch the fool moon so close that you could almost touch with your hands, now I Own a Nikon D3400 with a 70-300 lens zoom all the way out and results are very poor, please help! Am I doing something wrong.
That's too little information for me to understand what might be the difference, unless the lens on the PC 1304 extended to more than 300mm, the most likely issue.
this video is very helpful sir thanq
Thanks so much for your kind comment, appreciated.