bad ass..i setup screw machines in the 80's, just started coming out with sub spindles with live tooling turrets loved machining. Hated the assholes that crave job security
@@mz7315probably intentionally caused issues just so they could "fix" them to make themselves look important or invaluable, i dealt with the aftermath of that kinda person.
@@mz7315 They would often run the machine tools far slower than they should be operated at and this ultimately led to companies downsizing or going bankrupt and workers being let go en masse.
@mz7315 job security by means of no teamwork, no training others, low efficiency for the purpose of saying that it just takes a long time and there's no other choice.
So what is the product this machine makes? It looks like a coaxial RF connector, a little like SMA, but when you see him holding it in his hand it's massive.
It will be interesting to see the calculation on when it’s cost-effective to go to an eight spindle machine versus two or three machines back to back. On one hand, it saves you time and machining costs with a large order. On the other hand with two or three machines, a single machine outage doesn’t hurt you since you could switch part of the program over. A single machine going down, puts the whole operation out of business..
It also depends on what and how much of it you are making. If you produce a complex part using many different tools, and produce massive numbers of it (for example rf connectors, medical tools or fuel injectors), then having a row of machines that can do it all in one device saves a lot of time and money compared to hiring dozens of workers to manually move tens of thousands of parts between machines every day. But if you only make 50 parts per day, a cheaper mill and one dude swapping parts and tools by hand will be a lot more cost effective.
how do you QC this? With so many coming off so quickly how would you catch a batch of bad parts or how often would you check threads and dimensions and what not?
Statistical sampling. You can run a part through a CMM every so often (calculated by cpk/ppk) establish trends on criticals, and then not only have a very high confidence each part is good, but predict tool wear based off measurement. Also, if this part needed to be super critically accurate, they wouldnt eject it with a 1-2 foot drop to land on other parts and cause dinging/scratching.
what’s the part number, we want to know which parts are being made these days and will continue to be in the supply chain for the future. There’s a lot of products available, everything breaks eventually, tell us who’s investing in NEW technology like this MACHINE making
To think all of those moving parts and countless variables can consistently produce accurately machined components is truly amazing.
It’s just numbers
@@Ap_twsh Such machine tools used to be driven by cams. The CNC versions are a lot easier to repurpose for making different parts.
When I first started off on a manual lathe in school it took me 2 hours to make a part similar to that. :'(
You meant all day. This would take multiple setups.
Yeah, but you only needed to make one.
@@SaviorTheBurn I said similar, not the same. No spline or hexagon cut. I've also never done radiusing on a manual lathe.
@@PhatBoyFreshPretty sure on manual lathes you just use a special radius tool, would be very difficult to get a good radius just with the knobs.
bad ass..i setup screw machines in the 80's, just started coming out with sub spindles with live tooling turrets
loved machining. Hated the assholes that crave job security
"Hated the asshole that craved job security." How were they assholes for wanting job security?
@@mz7315probably intentionally caused issues just so they could "fix" them to make themselves look important or invaluable, i dealt with the aftermath of that kinda person.
@@mz7315 They would often run the machine tools far slower than they should be operated at and this ultimately led to companies downsizing or going bankrupt and workers being let go en masse.
@mz7315 job security by means of no teamwork, no training others, low efficiency for the purpose of saying that it just takes a long time and there's no other choice.
Donnie did this take in one breath.
crazy engineering 👀
10sec is crazy fast. 😮 Damn, I love that machine.😅 can we get a raffle going? Have any other machines you guys want to get rid of?😊
So what is the product this machine makes? It looks like a coaxial RF connector, a little like SMA, but when you see him holding it in his hand it's massive.
It will be interesting to see the calculation on when it’s cost-effective to go to an eight spindle machine versus two or three machines back to back. On one hand, it saves you time and machining costs with a large order. On the other hand with two or three machines, a single machine outage doesn’t hurt you since you could switch part of the program over. A single machine going down, puts the whole operation out of business..
It also depends on what and how much of it you are making. If you produce a complex part using many different tools, and produce massive numbers of it (for example rf connectors, medical tools or fuel injectors), then having a row of machines that can do it all in one device saves a lot of time and money compared to hiring dozens of workers to manually move tens of thousands of parts between machines every day. But if you only make 50 parts per day, a cheaper mill and one dude swapping parts and tools by hand will be a lot more cost effective.
Sometimes you get contracts so big that one of these type of machines is just dedicated to it for all its lifespan.
You could make a lot of scrap fast with that 😆
how do you QC this? With so many coming off so quickly how would you catch a batch of bad parts or how often would you check threads and dimensions and what not?
Statistical sampling.
You can run a part through a CMM every so often (calculated by cpk/ppk) establish trends on criticals, and then not only have a very high confidence each part is good, but predict tool wear based off measurement.
Also, if this part needed to be super critically accurate, they wouldnt eject it with a 1-2 foot drop to land on other parts and cause dinging/scratching.
Bro is making money each and every second crazy......
Take a Clip where we can see when you run out of Material
what’s the part number, we want to know which parts are being made these days and will continue to be in the supply chain for the future. There’s a lot of products available, everything breaks eventually, tell us who’s investing in NEW technology like this MACHINE making
So amazing
Imagine the parts diagram for that machine... "Refer to page 6533567" 😂
I think im in love. Thats a sexy machine 😮
SUPPER
Wow
Not a swiss machine. A machine made in Switzerland, yes. A Swiss machine? No. This is chucking machine.