It also looks like Sony is backing off the forced PSN account in single player games, and instead moving to just giving in game rewards to incentivize logging in. Seems like they may be slowly realizing that shooting themselves in the feet is unnecessary blog.playstation.com/2025/01/29/new-in-game-content-incentives-coming-to-playstation-games-on-pc/
@felipecorpuz2476 really? And here i thought i would finally be able to buy and play Ghost of tsushima. I guess piracy is the way as Sony clearly saying i have no right to buy their games.
teaching has its perks like having more free time than usual 9-5 job. It's a intensive job, you get tired a lot but you work small hours. However, i think Daniel here might be sacrificing his time of rest to do videos. I am amazed and jealous of his energy lol. He must really love doing videos
@@monguch01 Most teachers tend to disagree with having more free time than a 9-5 job from what I've seen. Since they need to do work outside of the actual teaching. Making ppts, making lesson plans, going to seminars/lessons themselves etc.
@@monguch01my mother was a teacher and she worked 7-3 for 30 years, barely had anytime.. Daniel must work a part time because Jesus Christ, he doesn't stop posting
I would say that I do agree with the first comment, games should be very well optimized but also don't have a ceiling so that we can see what the current top gpu and or future gpus would be able to pull out the game
@@Bronyboiiiii I dont think that is going to be physically possible period. At least not on silicon. Even if we double the best we have right now its not even close. Also you dont seem to remember the AA methods we used to have and how bad they were. The current gen of AI based upscalers are already way better in terms of quality and performance than the old methods. Yeah it costs a few ms of frame time, but its nearly negligible for the vast majority of cases. I mean what would you rather use for AA instead then?
Because nothing says very well optimized than having your 1 thousand dollar 4080 gpu be the req for 1440p 60 fps 🥱PC gamers have been abused so badly now that we are accepting this shit good lord.
To be honest, at this point in the game if you don’t have a SSD of any kind, you might as well just stop , go out to your local computer hardware store, and buy one. It is the cheapest and one of the most effective ways to gain performance out of your PC.
@@jmass4207 You overestimate the PC gaming community. A lot of people have a 2-4tb HDD full of games that don't want to spend the money needed to replace it with an equivalent size SSD and also don't want to uninstall any game because reasons. I have also heard "the graphics are not that better than the PS4 and the PS4 used HDD", without understanding that that's not how it works.
@@oddmofo People still playing with a HDD clearly have no clue about the price/performance ratio of a SSD. A 2TB SSD costs about 90-100€ (depending on the drive speed) and holds many games. As to installing/uninstalling: you don't have to throw away your HDD. Just use it as a backup and copy the games you want to play over to a SSD. We need to educate them! ^^
So Spiderman 2 comes out tomorrow... and ive seen zero ads on that... seems to me not a lot of people knows its coming out... Sony better not expect insane sales tomorrow cause I doubt its gonna be happening
@djangodjango5694 wait what how could such a big release have been leaked for almost a year in advance? (edit: I went and googled a little, looks like its from the Insomniac leak that happened last year?)
@ VxHokage007Almost all Sony games are now coming to PC. The Sony CEO confirmed it. In short, this is no longer a secret. Now, whenever they release a game, the first question is, "When PC?" and they now respond with "later" instead of denying it or saying, "We'll think about that."
@VxHokage007 yup, the insomniac leak. Only problem was that it was I think over 200gb or something but now it doesn't matter with that 140gb, it was still playable for a lot of people
Game Devs should separate graphic settings and resolutions like: Low 1080p, Mid 1080p, High 1080p, RT Low 1080p, RT Ultra 1080p etc... Low 1440p, Mid 1440p... Low 4K, Mid 4K... So the PC Spec Requirements is accurate
i like this, and btw...Daniel owen needs to be awarded, best graphics card and game analyst...coz you work so hard and accurate. The fact that you multitask and manage all this..its incredible.
I just want to say I love these videos that you do you like the only person that does these types of videos I always know what to look for in PC requirements cuz I've been building computer since I was 13 but I still enjoy the extra point if you want it
I also appreciate that when he benchmarks hardware he shows MANY resolutions and settings instead of just 1080p for CPUs and maxed out 1440/4k for GPUs.
There’s nothing crazy about it. Graphically, this game isn’t much different from Spider-Man Remastered, so it makes perfect sense for it to run on just 4GB of VRAM.
lol funny thing is this console game won't run on a ps4 pro which is supposed to be significantly more powerful than a 1650 lol. Consoles truly are pathetic.
It's not to do with the consoles, it is to do with keeping games exclusivw to the ps5. The ps4 ended first party support recently@@DragonOfTheMortalKombat
If I remember correctly amd's non-x3d CPUs underperformed a bit relative to Intel in the last spiderman, and it scales really well with faster memory. Could be something like that here.
You should know why AMD beat Intel, old games use up to 8 cores, 7800X3D is faster at ''single core'' performance wich mean 1 core vs 1 core or 8 cores vs 8 cores the AMD will win, but AMD 8 Cores vs 12 up to 20 Cores Intel, then the Intel will win if the game use that huge amount of cores, so if the game use only up to 8 or 10 cores 7800X3D will outperform it, but once it use more core count the 12900K will comeback and outperform 7800X3D due to the huge amount of core and thread count the i9 has, thats why in intensive mult core benchmarks for productivity the equal Intel usually outperform AMD.
140GB is a waste of drive space if you install it on a Steam Deck and play at lowest setting. Maybe game devs should consider ultra texture pack as an optional download so we can save some drive space and load time.
I'm going to give you insight since I have uncharted on pc, most of that is probably language packs. If you delete most but your native language in uncharted I believe you save something like 20gb ish.
@@bluej511 Then we only need to find out where the 4K texture packs are, so we can delete those and gain some 30gb extra that 90% of us will never use... they used to be a separate optional download, but lazy devs now make us download ALL the texture packs no matter what.
0:45 EXACTLY!! Alot of persons are so quick scream unoptimized the moment they see big flagship GPUs in the spec requirements. But if you look properly you can clearly see the game will be scaling from a friggin 1650 all the way up to a 4090. Thats actually impressive imo. Just take some time to dial in your settings to the visual quality to performance you want. Surprisingly alot of PC gamers dont even bother to tune their graphics settings. Also alot of them genuinely expect their actually old GPUs to run newer games at high graphic settings on high fps. Thats just RIDICULOUS. Thats exactly what Cyberpunk 2077 is doing. The game came out 4 hears ago and is now on its 5th year (crazy i know) yet it can still kneecap an RTX 5090 when absolutely CRANKED. Because CDPR took the time to give the players a ton of graphical options to run on modest hardware all the way up to knee capping 5090s. This also gives the game a longer life span because when new GPU series releases, people will wonder how this games that's notorious for flagship GPUs cry will now run on this generation. The game is 4 years old and is still one of the best looking games. Some companies just like 'future proofing' their games. Imagine a single player game is still being talked about 4 years later. Also lets goooooo my 3080ti is still in the RT high settings😤😤
they abandon it because greedia and epshit games keeps promoting unreal engine to lower production times at the cost of shittier optimization and boring,similar visuals in every game produced with that engine @@sasquatchcrew
@@sasquatchcrew With Witcher 2 and 3 you might have a point. But I never had a problem with Cyberpunk, even on launch it ran pretty well on my PC. Like sure, certain stuff was more demanding then they should've been. But given the disastrous state of the game on launch, the fact that it still had decent performance showed that they had a decent grasp on how to handle Red engine. And now with the whole game actually being polished, it is one of the best modern optimized PC versions you could play right now.
My guess with the RT settings is high = reflections only, very high = reflections and ambient occlusion, ultimate = reflections, ambient occlusion, and shadows, since nixxes did confirm those RT settings will be available for PC
I sure hope they can be adjusted individually. The raster versions of ambient occlusion usually look perfectly fine. It's reflections and shadows that make a difference.
@@andersjjensen they will all be individual toggles, reflections is the biggest changer in visuals, I remember miles morales had RT shadows but they were really expensive for honestly barely any visual bump, Spider-Man 2 further makes the raster lighting and shadows better so I doubt anybody will use RT AO or Shadows.
@@perkzy5146 My thoughts exactly. RT shadows just don't look as good as Raster shadows. In every game I have played. And the performance hit in, *OOOF*.
@@duskysfm yes, And I'd say the same for Indiana Jones. Its looking so mediocre, none of the ray tracing benefits are passed down to consumers. And people appreciate these games for optimization. Like bruhh ofc its optimized if looks last gen lol. IDtech is overrated af.
You should be looking at Spiderman : Miles Morales PC. That came out after Spiderman Remaster so it should be closer to this new Spiderman 2 in tech and features.
Why would a game require 140 Gb of storage? That is insane! Soon one will require a 1tb ssd for 2-3 games installed. It is time for developers to make it optional to download 4k and 8k textures for those who want it. For others, let them have 1080 or 2k textures, hence reducing the size.
There's also a certain Artist's bias where they don't want their game to look bad or butchered because of the lower resolution of textures especially in such a big and fast moving open world where bad textures can be rather distracting. Also, they might not even think about lower res textures because it conflicts with something else like lighting
People said the same thing about black ops 3 in 2015 (112 GB). And yet here we are in 2025, where statistically speaking the super majority of games are still below 100 GB.
Guys, I have an RX 7600 and I play games with Pathtracing enabled. Yes you can enjpy Pathtracing without ray reconstruction, and yes it works well with 8GBs of video memory. All you need to do is to render the game at 540p or lower through the use of FSR. It doesn't look bad at all and enables entry level cards to do raytracing. Now, this game doesn't have any sort of heavy raytracing, so you can probably render the game at 540p with frame gen enabled to be able to average 50 fps with everything maxed out. Upscaling is amazing!
@@HIIMUsc I have 8 SATA ports too. Who doesn't have SATA? I have about 50TB here. I store installs and swap them to M2 if I want to use them. Don't need 50TB but storage surely isn't a problem with 8 and 12 TB drives now.
@ valid point, me personally i liked the simplicity of only using m.2 drives, no cables to manage, nothing in your case which takes up extra space, and the m.2s are usually faster, but more expensive 😄
I think it should challenge the current top end GPU at a ceiling of 30FPS. So push the limits right up until it causes the game to run at 30 consistent FPS at max settings highest resolution (story driven games).
Considering this game wasn’t released on PS4 it makes sense that it is more demanding than the 1st one and Miles Morales ! Scalability is great but I have hard time considering 720p/30 an acceptable experience, especially in an extremely fast paced game like this. I wouldn’t recommend buying the game to play with this kind of performance and visuals ! Games are expensive and you would be better of saving to buy better parts and play the game later in way better conditions !
Scalability beyond normal current gen hardware is great, nothing like coming back to a game 5-6 years in the future with better hardware and being able to get even more performance out of a game
1:10 the problem is that AAA modern games are usually ONLY optimized for the *barely 60 FPS on a 4090* experience, and then frame generation/upscaling is what the rest of humanity have to use to even get close to 60 FPS
And if going by how Nixxies usually do their specs, theirs usually is based without any upscalers in mind. So if it is the same here, the fact that you could maybe run the game on high settings with RT on without any upscaling on a 4070 or 7900 xt is a great sign. Sure high settings requiring a RX 6800 could raise some eyebrows given that the PS5 is sort of based on the 6700. But given it is still custom hardware and console optimization works a bit different then on PC, especially for first party games, even that I'm not that bothered by.
wish we could have modular downloads for games based on the resolution we cap our games at. removing all the 4k assets for those who play at 1440p would help reduce the download size.
@@UrExtremeGamer haha, yes it was. And back then? it looked amazing. It was a bigger jump from 360p or 480i via Composite (REd,white,yellow) to 720p via component (green,blue,red) then 1080p to 4k honestly. we were mostly playing on bulb screen tvs that looked terrible. Suddenly, we had a console that could do 720p (xbox 360) and with the right tv or monitor it looks amazing. Xbox 360 was the first time we had a console that actively and often could do a game at 720p, or upscale a game to that resolution. And it was the first time console players could afford a system which was that powerful. In fact, the xbox 360 was stronger than gaming PCS at that time, mostly. A funny contrast when compared to today haha. Funny how that works.
@UrExtremeGamer haha yes it does now, however!!!!! With DLSS upscaling alot of people are playing at 720p, and don't even know it!! DLSS upscaler will upscale 720p to 1080p and it looks pretty good. So 720p isn't COMPLETE dead, including handheld use it allot ❤️❤️ Hahaha.
Looks good to me. I would have liked them to specify if they are using upscaling and frame generation. But at some point you can just ask them to list all settings, so I get that they have to stop at some point. But upscaling does effect performance quite a bit so it would be nice to know.
I would argue that maxing out absurdly powerful cards to not do that much visually is not optimized and if they did better there it would result in lower resource usage and retaining the same fidelity or improving fidelity and still maxing out the card. Either way, it would also look or perform better on lower tier hardware as a result.
remember that the gtx 970 came out ~11 years ago. while a gtx 1650 isn't asking for much, at 720p and 30 fps it isn't offering much either. people will still whine no doubt, i mean that's easier then saving up for a gpu that is capable of more modern performance. like if you haven't been able to afford a better upgrade by now, you will certainly not be upgrading in the coming decade with what's coming. if you think prices are bad, just you wait.
@gorillagroddgaming Never rely on that unless you really need performance. The difference between performance and ultra performance is honestly probably the biggest downgrade in quality between all the upscaling presets, but the fps goes up the most, so.
No they thought they were cool by being upfront how dogsht unoptimised there game is without upscaling by saying listen it's a $1k 4080 for 1440p 60 fps take it or leave it. I mean we don't want to see game req where they are using upscaling or frame gen to reach 60 fps for sure but if your performance is this insulting to gamers maybe you should just make it a req anyway. Not like any of these dog studios will ever spend a single day or penny optimising the games performance before release these days anyway
I like these hardware requirements, personally I think that these are quite reasonable for minimum and recommended. 3070 for 1440p is great, and a 3060 for 1080p is also not bad, since it's a AAA game. Compared to what we've got recently with Indiana Jones, etc, this looks like it's decently optimized.
i don't think there is path tracing, it doesn't look like it from the screenshots and trailers. the biggest heavy lifting in path tracing comes from global/sky illumination which also includes soft sky shadows, the stuff you see a lot in those cyberpunk2077 dream ultrarealistic mods with overcast weather
Do you think that AMD will add RT accelerators to their gaming CPUs? Is that even possible? I know that RT is pretty heavy on the CPU as well which is why I'm wondering this. It'll also allow them to take a bit of load off their GPUs since they are behind Nvidia.
Noob question: If the very minimum is a 1650, shouldn't the medium performance be aimed at a 2060 or similar? I think it is quite a large jump to the 3060 for medium, even if its double the FPS.
People are spoiled, since the Tesla architechture (and the Core 2 Quads), hardware were able to play games for many, many years. You bought some mid range card, and were able to play on high settings, in 1080p, for years. They expect the same, they want to see RX6700 able to play everything on high settings :D But the technology started to evolve again, after 15years of stagnation. The fact that a first gen i5 can still play new games (not everything, and on kinda low FPS) is a joke. Imagine Underground 2 being played on a 486, without 3D accelerator. People have absolutely no idea how gaming used to be, and how good gaming is since quad cores and Tesla.
I wonder if these FPS performance measurements are not including dlss and/or frame gen. Because if so that would be great cuz that would mean you could get much greater FPS by simply using dlss and or frame gen, if not, then this is really bad news because this means that not only is this the best case scenario already but it means that by default you would have to use dlss performance mode along with frame Jen just to get the Bare Bones basic FPS that you should already have.
I don’t know if im lucked out by the grace of god but my rtx 2060 and r5 5600 OC and 32 gb ram is running this game flawlessly with dlss and frame gen with high and medium settings 60-70 fps no frame dips until the in game cutscenes with very high TQ and 8x TF
ghost of tsushima on pc was also from nixxes, and it was sooooo good for me. i played on 4k with a xtx and fsr was perfekt! I imagine dlss was also perfect. Nixxes is doing a good job!
Taking the huge performance hit for ray tracing in a game like this just for shadows and occlusion is truly the dumbest thing I've ever seen. When playing the game (not looking at stills/side by sides) you 100% will not even notice the difference, but you will feel the frame rate hit.
Happy gamers on pc will get to play this game! It’s really good. Not earth shattering, but just good fun. Also, do yourself a favor and play this on a good OLED😁
I have a 3060 12GB paired with a 5600X so I should be okay for 1080p. I'd be very interested in seeing a direct match of the PS5 performance mode graphics settings and trying them on my PC to see if I get the same performance or not.
You usually don't need a guide to optimize the settings. Just run 1440p DLSS Quality/Balanced and high settings with ultra textures and ultra texture filtering (you have the VRAM). Or 1080p if you still didn't upgrade. Next step is DLSS Performance, then medium and finally low, but it will look bad.
kinda wild that the ps5 gpu effectively a 6700 non xt is way below anything they would suggest for ray tracing. even though they said every mode used it.
This game was a PS5 only game. Maybe you wanted to say that that game was based on a PS4 game, but that is not really true either since you can fly in this one, and while flying the game world moves past you much faster.
To be fair Spider man 2 is a Sony game so it had to run at 60 fps high settings on a graphics card that's between a 6700 and a 6700XT that might be why the requirements are reasonable. It might not look as good as your Allan wake and Hellblade 2's.
@@StaceyJensenn Just looked this up and it confirmed my suspicions. Game developers need to account for additional temporary files created during gameplay, potential updates, save files, and future patches, which can significantly increase the space needed on your drive beyond the initial game installation size.
Interesting how the maxed out setting at 4K require the 4090 and 12900k, but the 4070 is just high with raytracing high. I have a 4090 laptop, which is a little better than the 4070, but it's also similar at 1440p to how a 4090 performs at 4K. I imagine this game is quite a bit heavy on the CPU than we think.
@chriswheeler5808 the heating on mine isn't that bad. The issue is more on the cpu. If I keep the tdp at 65watts, it never goes above 90C, but then a cpu intensive game would be an issue like, for example, Dragon's Dogma 2.
just tested it, it eat vram like crazy, 15gb usage on my rx 6800 non xt even at 1440p with fsr :D rip all who owns 8 10 12gb gpus ^_^ normal RAM usage is also way above 16gb that they suggest, i get around 24 28gb usage with nothing running in background :D
@@NostalgicMem0ries If you download MSI afterburner and enable memory usage, this only shows allocation (this is what Adrenaline is showing). If you enable GPU dedicated memory usage \ process, that shows you the amount of memory the actual current process is actually using. Games tend to allocate as much memory as possible and releases it when it needs to be. Adrenaline doesn't show actual utilisation.
@@riven4121 i just searched internet, all sites from official ones to various tech ones say adrenaline shows usage not allocation, the msi afterburner tho without some tweaks in settings shows allocation at first.
In Spider-Man Remastered Intel performs unusually well, and the game scales unusually well with memory frequency (not latency). That said, if the 7800X3D is the first AMD CPU to break 60FPS with all the RT, and the 12900k is the first Intel CPU to break 60FPS, then they don't care that the 7800X3D is actually faster. It's just the minimum requirement.
@ Doesn't change the fact that the chart shows the first CPU's from either brand that A) Broke the requirement barrier, and B) They actually had on hand for testing. This is a minimum requirements chart. Not a statement about equality.
I had to put all your recent videos ON so they could get viewership + HUB, derBauer, Tech YES City, Techtesters, 1Level but it was too messy to listen so I tunned it down.
I have to write a sentence here because im very annoyed of this: 30FPS regarding the mininum spec 720p is not what i would consider playable. So pls stop saying this. This column is nonsense.
You talked about scalibility , but as a game studio if u consider 720p @30fps a preset then yes, u will get a good scalibility , but who in real life would play at 720p @fps very low? next time they will add 480p 20 fps very low, and boom u got scalibility
Recommended in this case being 1080p 60 fps second to lowest graphic settings. If you are happy with this just buy a console for 1/5th of the price lol
@weeb_hunter Can you use a console as a laptop? And can the consoles play all Steam and Epic Games games that people coming from a PC have already bought?
@weeb_hunter Sure man. They should just buy a whole new console instead of using the laptop that they already have to play one game. No problems there!
@ It's always hilarious to see people wanting to influence and dictate how others live their lives and what do you have? can your device run it on the recommended settings?
Will it run on a ryzen 5 5600x gtx 1660 super and 16 gigs of ram? Bc you know the specs are kinda high for how the game looks,i mean it looks amazing but it looks exactly like spiderman remastered
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
It also looks like Sony is backing off the forced PSN account in single player games, and instead moving to just giving in game rewards to incentivize logging in. Seems like they may be slowly realizing that shooting themselves in the feet is unnecessary blog.playstation.com/2025/01/29/new-in-game-content-incentives-coming-to-playstation-games-on-pc/
people from other regions still can't play it tho, sadge
@felipecorpuz2476 really? And here i thought i would finally be able to buy and play Ghost of tsushima. I guess piracy is the way as Sony clearly saying i have no right to buy their games.
@ yeah, it's sad. I'm from PH and the game disappeared on steam.
Nice
@@TDylanX5 according to some devs, piracy is better than resellers. Resellers arent illegal so by pirating you do nothing wrong
*Is this guy really still teacher* ? Man this guy has been covering the 5000 and recent pc news like a Daily Planet reporter 😅
teaching has its perks like having more free time than usual 9-5 job. It's a intensive job, you get tired a lot but you work small hours. However, i think Daniel here might be sacrificing his time of rest to do videos. I am amazed and jealous of his energy lol. He must really love doing videos
Gotta make the money some how. Teaching doesn't cut it plus he loves PC stuff. Why not make the extra bucks doing what you love?
@@monguch01 Most teachers tend to disagree with having more free time than a 9-5 job from what I've seen. Since they need to do work outside of the actual teaching. Making ppts, making lesson plans, going to seminars/lessons themselves etc.
I would buy just a portion of his energy in bag if u get my drift
@@monguch01my mother was a teacher and she worked 7-3 for 30 years, barely had anytime.. Daniel must work a part time because Jesus Christ, he doesn't stop posting
I would say that I do agree with the first comment, games should be very well optimized but also don't have a ceiling so that we can see what the current top gpu and or future gpus would be able to pull out the game
Well, that would be getting more fps without the need of upscalers. Just imagine 4k 240hz without all the arifacts and latency DLSS4 brings.
@@Bronyboiiiii "without all the arifacts" and how do you plan to achieve that?
@edwardevans1498With a future stronger gpu 5+ years from now they just said..
@@Bronyboiiiii I dont think that is going to be physically possible period. At least not on silicon. Even if we double the best we have right now its not even close. Also you dont seem to remember the AA methods we used to have and how bad they were. The current gen of AI based upscalers are already way better in terms of quality and performance than the old methods. Yeah it costs a few ms of frame time, but its nearly negligible for the vast majority of cases. I mean what would you rather use for AA instead then?
Because nothing says very well optimized than having your 1 thousand dollar 4080 gpu be the req for 1440p 60 fps 🥱PC gamers have been abused so badly now that we are accepting this shit good lord.
To be honest, at this point in the game if you don’t have a SSD of any kind, you might as well just stop , go out to your local computer hardware store, and buy one. It is the cheapest and one of the most effective ways to gain performance out of your PC.
I doubt anyone describable as such cares about modern games.
@@jmass4207 You overestimate the PC gaming community. A lot of people have a 2-4tb HDD full of games that don't want to spend the money needed to replace it with an equivalent size SSD and also don't want to uninstall any game because reasons. I have also heard "the graphics are not that better than the PS4 and the PS4 used HDD", without understanding that that's not how it works.
@@oddmofo People still playing with a HDD clearly have no clue about the price/performance ratio of a SSD. A 2TB SSD costs about 90-100€ (depending on the drive speed) and holds many games. As to installing/uninstalling: you don't have to throw away your HDD. Just use it as a backup and copy the games you want to play over to a SSD.
We need to educate them! ^^
So Spiderman 2 comes out tomorrow... and ive seen zero ads on that... seems to me not a lot of people knows its coming out... Sony better not expect insane sales tomorrow cause I doubt its gonna be happening
game is mehh
Game is kinda mid compared to the first one, and many pc players have been playing the pirated version for almost a year (it was leaked)
@djangodjango5694 wait what how could such a big release have been leaked for almost a year in advance? (edit: I went and googled a little, looks like its from the Insomniac leak that happened last year?)
@ VxHokage007Almost all Sony games are now coming to PC.
The Sony CEO confirmed it.
In short, this is no longer a secret.
Now, whenever they release a game, the first question is, "When PC?" and they now respond with "later" instead of denying it or saying, "We'll think about that."
@VxHokage007 yup, the insomniac leak. Only problem was that it was I think over 200gb or something but now it doesn't matter with that 140gb, it was still playable for a lot of people
Game Devs should separate graphic settings and resolutions like:
Low 1080p, Mid 1080p, High 1080p, RT Low 1080p, RT Ultra 1080p etc...
Low 1440p, Mid 1440p...
Low 4K, Mid 4K...
So the PC Spec Requirements is accurate
Most devs are lazy and talentless because of DEI and gender quotas so they won’t do that.
Stop complaining and just buy the 5090.. if you cant afford it you shouldnt complain
@FO0TMinecraftPVP oh only 5090? lmao...I could even buy an Nvidia H100 anytime soon...so stop being brokie and buy an H100 like me
@UltraVegito-1995bro used the stones to destroy the stones...😂
@@FO0TMinecraftPVP what's the color of your Bugatti?
i like this, and btw...Daniel owen needs to be awarded, best graphics card and game analyst...coz you work so hard and accurate. The fact that you multitask and manage all this..its incredible.
I just want to say I love these videos that you do you like the only person that does these types of videos I always know what to look for in PC requirements cuz I've been building computer since I was 13 but I still enjoy the extra point if you want it
I also appreciate that when he benchmarks hardware he shows MANY resolutions and settings instead of just 1080p for CPUs and maxed out 1440/4k for GPUs.
I am very happy with Nixxes porting. having a PS5 game running on only 4GB Vram is insane to me
If you take a big enough hit to texture and asset quality, anything is possible. The hard part is the CPU side of things.
Consoles have a shared ram for everything, if im not mistaken
There’s nothing crazy about it. Graphically, this game isn’t much different from Spider-Man Remastered, so it makes perfect sense for it to run on just 4GB of VRAM.
lol funny thing is this console game won't run on a ps4 pro which is supposed to be significantly more powerful than a 1650 lol. Consoles truly are pathetic.
It's not to do with the consoles, it is to do with keeping games exclusivw to the ps5.
The ps4 ended first party support recently@@DragonOfTheMortalKombat
7800X3D and 12900K seem to be drastically different performers. Wonder why they have them listed as equivalent.
I would assume that the game is not cache hungry.
If I remember correctly amd's non-x3d CPUs underperformed a bit relative to Intel in the last spiderman, and it scales really well with faster memory. Could be something like that here.
@@danielowentech I think you meant Intel
You should know why AMD beat Intel, old games use up to 8 cores, 7800X3D is faster at ''single core'' performance wich mean 1 core vs 1 core or 8 cores vs 8 cores the AMD will win, but AMD 8 Cores vs 12 up to 20 Cores Intel, then the Intel will win if the game use that huge amount of cores, so if the game use only up to 8 or 10 cores 7800X3D will outperform it, but once it use more core count the 12900K will comeback and outperform 7800X3D due to the huge amount of core and thread count the i9 has, thats why in intensive mult core benchmarks for productivity the equal Intel usually outperform AMD.
@@TheVideomaster138 whoops, yeah
Recently came across this channel. Loving the in-depth explanations and coverage of different topics regarding games and pc!
Appreciate you pushing put videos even multiple per day... Thanks...!
140GB is a waste of drive space if you install it on a Steam Deck and play at lowest setting. Maybe game devs should consider ultra texture pack as an optional download so we can save some drive space and load time.
I'm going to give you insight since I have uncharted on pc, most of that is probably language packs. If you delete most but your native language in uncharted I believe you save something like 20gb ish.
@@bluej511 That's pretty big brain
@@GruelingFive8 that's probably why some of the big data games are so big in gb, mostly voice audio packs
You do think it will run on a steam deck ? 😅
@@bluej511 Then we only need to find out where the 4K texture packs are, so we can delete those and gain some 30gb extra that 90% of us will never use... they used to be a separate optional download, but lazy devs now make us download ALL the texture packs no matter what.
0:45 EXACTLY!!
Alot of persons are so quick scream unoptimized the moment they see big flagship GPUs in the spec requirements. But if you look properly you can clearly see the game will be scaling from a friggin 1650 all the way up to a 4090. Thats actually impressive imo.
Just take some time to dial in your settings to the visual quality to performance you want.
Surprisingly alot of PC gamers dont even bother to tune their graphics settings.
Also alot of them genuinely expect their actually old GPUs to run newer games at high graphic settings on high fps. Thats just RIDICULOUS.
Thats exactly what Cyberpunk 2077 is doing. The game came out 4 hears ago and is now on its 5th year (crazy i know) yet it can still kneecap an RTX 5090 when absolutely CRANKED. Because CDPR took the time to give the players a ton of graphical options to run on modest hardware all the way up to knee capping 5090s.
This also gives the game a longer life span because when new GPU series releases, people will wonder how this games that's notorious for flagship GPUs cry will now run on this generation. The game is 4 years old and is still one of the best looking games. Some companies just like 'future proofing' their games.
Imagine a single player game is still being talked about 4 years later.
Also lets goooooo my 3080ti is still in the RT high settings😤😤
Ppl just broke and stupid lol 😂 they ar lazy and hate the rich 😂
To be fair, RED engine is arguably not as optmized as it should be.
To the point they have to abandon it.
they abandon it because greedia and epshit games keeps promoting unreal engine to lower production times at the cost of shittier optimization and boring,similar visuals in every game produced with that engine @@sasquatchcrew
People expect 4090 performance from 4060. It's pathetic.
Nevertheless, Unreal does seem to have issues.
@@sasquatchcrew With Witcher 2 and 3 you might have a point. But I never had a problem with Cyberpunk, even on launch it ran pretty well on my PC. Like sure, certain stuff was more demanding then they should've been. But given the disastrous state of the game on launch, the fact that it still had decent performance showed that they had a decent grasp on how to handle Red engine. And now with the whole game actually being polished, it is one of the best modern optimized PC versions you could play right now.
My guess with the RT settings is high = reflections only, very high = reflections and ambient occlusion, ultimate = reflections, ambient occlusion, and shadows, since nixxes did confirm those RT settings will be available for PC
I sure hope they can be adjusted individually. The raster versions of ambient occlusion usually look perfectly fine. It's reflections and shadows that make a difference.
Path Tracing or better don’t port 😡🤬😡
@@andersjjensen they will all be individual toggles, reflections is the biggest changer in visuals, I remember miles morales had RT shadows but they were really expensive for honestly barely any visual bump, Spider-Man 2 further makes the raster lighting and shadows better so I doubt anybody will use RT AO or Shadows.
@@perkzy5146 My thoughts exactly. RT shadows just don't look as good as Raster shadows. In every game I have played. And the performance hit in, *OOOF*.
Looking forward to the benchmarks
Meanwhile, Doom The Dark Ages: "Only Ray Tracing. Take it or leave"
doesn't even look good either and screen space reflections is literally in the trailer
@@duskysfm yes, And I'd say the same for Indiana Jones. Its looking so mediocre, none of the ray tracing benefits are passed down to consumers. And people appreciate these games for optimization. Like bruhh ofc its optimized if looks last gen lol. IDtech is overrated af.
I don't think IDTech was appreciated for it's looks. People just like Doom and how the games run
@@DragonOfTheMortalKombatyeah but Indiana Jones runs damn well on entry level RT hardware GPUS.
unfortunately... :/
Awesome videos, thanks for keeping us in the know!
Daniel, you are plugged in and understand what gamers want. Good job!
You should be looking at Spiderman : Miles Morales PC. That came out after Spiderman Remaster so it should be closer to this new Spiderman 2 in tech and features.
Future of gaming:
Minimum specs:
720p30*
GPU: RTX 5070
* with MFG enabled in 4x mode
😭
by that time we will have 1500$ rtx 7060
@@Ghost-pb4ts $1500? More like $150,000
@@cyanicxl00 So the dollar will be worth jack shit by then? Good to know.
We r laughing rt now but it wil probably happen in next 4-5 yrs. It's scary.
At the very least, im ready to binge watch it on RUclips
Thanks men for this analysis.
it’s just one guy afaik
@@stuff6181He said "men" not " mens " 🤣
@@henrik5299"Men" is plural...
@@hugoanderkivi I know , it was a joke )
@@henrik5299 Ah, ok, 👍.
I would love to see you follow up on these with the actual requirements after the game comes out.
Why would a game require 140 Gb of storage? That is insane! Soon one will require a 1tb ssd for 2-3 games installed.
It is time for developers to make it optional to download 4k and 8k textures for those who want it. For others, let them have 1080 or 2k textures, hence reducing the size.
There's also a certain Artist's bias where they don't want their game to look bad or butchered because of the lower resolution of textures especially in such a big and fast moving open world where bad textures can be rather distracting. Also, they might not even think about lower res textures because it conflicts with something else like lighting
People said the same thing about black ops 3 in 2015 (112 GB). And yet here we are in 2025, where statistically speaking the super majority of games are still below 100 GB.
Wait until you see Rise of Ronin for Pc 😂 almost 200gb crazy it looks like an ps 3 games
Don't wanna be that annoying nerd, but 1080p is 2K. 1920x1080= 2k. 3840x2160=4K, because 1.92~2, and 3.84~4
@oxxylix504 Anyways...🥱
game doesnt require ray tracing which is a major W in my book already
only on the lowest end bruhh
Would definitely enjoy a spiderman 2 benchmark :)
Guys, I have an RX 7600 and I play games with Pathtracing enabled. Yes you can enjpy Pathtracing without ray reconstruction, and yes it works well with 8GBs of video memory. All you need to do is to render the game at 540p or lower through the use of FSR. It doesn't look bad at all and enables entry level cards to do raytracing. Now, this game doesn't have any sort of heavy raytracing, so you can probably render the game at 540p with frame gen enabled to be able to average 50 fps with everything maxed out. Upscaling is amazing!
Nice to see that they designed the game to be playable on something like the steam deck, to an absolute beast of a 9800x3d with a 5090....
2 tb drives have become the standard pretty quickly. Luckily the prices have come down. I guess I’ll just keep my eye out for a 4tb deal.
You can get 2 drives, you know.
@@CurtOntheRadiodepends on how manny m.2‘s he got left, i have 3/4 m.2 filled, tho with a total of 7tb, my last option also would be 4tb if needed
@@HIIMUsc I have 8 SATA ports too. Who doesn't have SATA?
I have about 50TB here. I store installs and swap them to M2 if I want to use them. Don't need 50TB but storage surely isn't a problem with 8 and 12 TB drives now.
@ valid point, me personally i liked the simplicity of only using m.2 drives, no cables to manage, nothing in your case which takes up extra space, and the m.2s are usually faster, but more expensive 😄
I think it should challenge the current top end GPU at a ceiling of 30FPS. So push the limits right up until it causes the game to run at 30 consistent FPS at max settings highest resolution (story driven games).
Considering this game wasn’t released on PS4 it makes sense that it is more demanding than the 1st one and Miles Morales ! Scalability is great but I have hard time considering 720p/30 an acceptable experience, especially in an extremely fast paced game like this. I wouldn’t recommend buying the game to play with this kind of performance and visuals ! Games are expensive and you would be better of saving to buy better parts and play the game later in way better conditions !
Most RUclips videos nowadays are overproduced. You manage to achieve the same thing with so little effort. You're an efficiency monster and I love it.
Can you do benchmark videos for Spider Man 2?
Scalability beyond normal current gen hardware is great, nothing like coming back to a game 5-6 years in the future with better hardware and being able to get even more performance out of a game
I wish more people can understand this.
As always great content
Great optimization
Acceptable specs across different hardware
Unlike others like Monster Hunter Wilds and such
Indiana Jones joke 🤡.
1:10 the problem is that AAA modern games are usually ONLY optimized for the *barely 60 FPS on a 4090* experience, and then frame generation/upscaling is what the rest of humanity have to use to even get close to 60 FPS
And if going by how Nixxies usually do their specs, theirs usually is based without any upscalers in mind. So if it is the same here, the fact that you could maybe run the game on high settings with RT on without any upscaling on a 4070 or 7900 xt is a great sign.
Sure high settings requiring a RX 6800 could raise some eyebrows given that the PS5 is sort of based on the 6700. But given it is still custom hardware and console optimization works a bit different then on PC, especially for first party games, even that I'm not that bothered by.
wish we could have modular downloads for games based on the resolution we cap our games at. removing all the 4k assets for those who play at 1440p would help reduce the download size.
Still no preorder button on steam and it releases in 4 hours...
I love the fact they have a "720p" section. XD
Blast from the past. AH, when 720p was the 4k of today.
I really appreciate the 720p section. 720p was really the 4k back then?😅
@@UrExtremeGamer haha, yes it was. And back then? it looked amazing. It was a bigger jump from 360p or 480i via Composite (REd,white,yellow) to 720p via component (green,blue,red) then 1080p to 4k honestly.
we were mostly playing on bulb screen tvs that looked terrible.
Suddenly, we had a console that could do 720p (xbox 360) and with the right tv or monitor it looks amazing. Xbox 360 was the first time we had a console that actively and often could do a game at 720p, or upscale a game to that resolution. And it was the first time console players could afford a system which was that powerful. In fact, the xbox 360 was stronger than gaming PCS at that time, mostly. A funny contrast when compared to today haha.
Funny how that works.
@DaveTheeMan-wj2nk wow, that's amazing. Too bad 720p nowadays look pixilated🥲
SteamDeck hello...
@UrExtremeGamer haha yes it does now, however!!!!!
With DLSS upscaling alot of people are playing at 720p, and don't even know it!!
DLSS upscaler will upscale 720p to 1080p and it looks pretty good.
So 720p isn't COMPLETE dead, including handheld use it allot ❤️❤️
Hahaha.
Wait what? Reasonable pc requirements, what year is this 2015?
Looks good to me.
I would have liked them to specify if they are using upscaling and frame generation. But at some point you can just ask them to list all settings, so I get that they have to stop at some point. But upscaling does effect performance quite a bit so it would be nice to know.
In this list there is no FG or upscaling involved
@@blastmox Where do you see that?
I can only find that DLSS, FSR and XeSS is supported.
@ Nixxies usually gives the raw specs without upscaling and if upscaling is involved then they mention it in the requirements list
I would argue that maxing out absurdly powerful cards to not do that much visually is not optimized and if they did better there it would result in lower resource usage and retaining the same fidelity or improving fidelity and still maxing out the card. Either way, it would also look or perform better on lower tier hardware as a result.
remember that the gtx 970 came out ~11 years ago.
while a gtx 1650 isn't asking for much, at 720p and 30 fps it isn't offering much either.
people will still whine no doubt, i mean that's easier then saving up for a gpu that is capable of more modern performance.
like if you haven't been able to afford a better upgrade by now, you will certainly not be upgrading in the coming decade with what's coming. if you think prices are bad, just you wait.
damn my first gpu was the evga gtx 970, built in 2015, good gpu though
@@NickkTran
yea great gpu at the time.
Using DLSS or no DLSS for 60fps?
Using DLSS ultra performance
@gorillagroddgaming not true at all, this is a lie
@gorillagroddgaming Never rely on that unless you really need performance. The difference between performance and ultra performance is honestly probably the biggest downgrade in quality between all the upscaling presets, but the fps goes up the most, so.
No they thought they were cool by being upfront how dogsht unoptimised there game is without upscaling by saying listen it's a $1k 4080 for 1440p 60 fps take it or leave it.
I mean we don't want to see game req where they are using upscaling or frame gen to reach 60 fps for sure but if your performance is this insulting to gamers maybe you should just make it a req anyway. Not like any of these dog studios will ever spend a single day or penny optimising the games performance before release these days anyway
i am glad that i seem able to run the game at medium.
Hell I'll even turn down shadows or lighting FX if it means a steady 60fps
Specs seem reasonable for, what at it's core is a PS4 game with RT reflections in it.
Dlss4 couldnt come at a more perfect time! Dlss performance will be a life saver for alot of the rtx cards
No, it won't. You cannot beat the latency issue. Also, not to mention the horrible artefacting.
Really wanna see things like 1440p 60fps, 1440p 120fps, 1440p 180fps, etc. Almost no one still has a 60hz monitor
I like these hardware requirements, personally I think that these are quite reasonable for minimum and recommended. 3070 for 1440p is great, and a 3060 for 1080p is also not bad, since it's a AAA game. Compared to what we've got recently with Indiana Jones, etc, this looks like it's decently optimized.
I look seeing them actually think about what a lower end components can actually run the game at and telling us
i don't think there is path tracing, it doesn't look like it from the screenshots and trailers. the biggest heavy lifting in path tracing comes from global/sky illumination which also includes soft sky shadows, the stuff you see a lot in those cyberpunk2077 dream ultrarealistic mods with overcast weather
Do you think that AMD will add RT accelerators to their gaming CPUs? Is that even possible?
I know that RT is pretty heavy on the CPU as well which is why I'm wondering this. It'll also allow them to take a bit of load off their GPUs since they are behind Nvidia.
I am ready! 9800X3D and 4080!
1650? More like $16.50.
Most gamers = Excited for release
Floating Daniel = Exicited about system requirements
Noob question: If the very minimum is a 1650, shouldn't the medium performance be aimed at a 2060 or similar? I think it is quite a large jump to the 3060 for medium, even if its double the FPS.
Hello fellow Is your PC ready? enjoyers.
Thanks Daniel
Im will try this on my Ryzen 7 5700g upscaling is very helpful in low end graphics
My 7900XT really has been sweating these days
without RT amd is a beast
Key word being RT...@@Ghost-pb4ts
I like how they don't include 4k high requirements cause it is similar to 1440p native if you use upscaling.
That relative performance of techpowerup 1650... well is old, 1650 are on par and beat the 970 is some games.
People are spoiled, since the Tesla architechture (and the Core 2 Quads), hardware were able to play games for many, many years. You bought some mid range card, and were able to play on high settings, in 1080p, for years. They expect the same, they want to see RX6700 able to play everything on high settings :D But the technology started to evolve again, after 15years of stagnation.
The fact that a first gen i5 can still play new games (not everything, and on kinda low FPS) is a joke. Imagine Underground 2 being played on a 486, without 3D accelerator.
People have absolutely no idea how gaming used to be, and how good gaming is since quad cores and Tesla.
I wonder if these FPS performance measurements are not including dlss and/or frame gen. Because if so that would be great cuz that would mean you could get much greater FPS by simply using dlss and or frame gen, if not, then this is really bad news because this means that not only is this the best case scenario already but it means that by default you would have to use dlss performance mode along with frame Jen just to get the Bare Bones basic FPS that you should already have.
I don’t know if im lucked out by the grace of god but my rtx 2060 and r5 5600 OC and 32 gb ram is running this game flawlessly with dlss and frame gen with high and medium settings 60-70 fps no frame dips until the in game cutscenes with very high TQ and 8x TF
ghost of tsushima on pc was also from nixxes, and it was sooooo good for me. i played on 4k with a xtx and fsr was perfekt! I imagine dlss was also perfect. Nixxes is doing a good job!
spider webs will look beautiful with dlss4 upscaling
3 videos a day, I guess Daniel also enjoys Lunar new year with us Asian lol
Taking the huge performance hit for ray tracing in a game like this just for shadows and occlusion is truly the dumbest thing I've ever seen. When playing the game (not looking at stills/side by sides) you 100% will not even notice the difference, but you will feel the frame rate hit.
That 5500xt is probably the 4gb version the 8gb version should easily get 1080p low 60
Happy gamers on pc will get to play this game! It’s really good. Not earth shattering, but just good fun. Also, do yourself a favor and play this on a good OLED😁
I have a 3060 12GB paired with a 5600X so I should be okay for 1080p. I'd be very interested in seeing a direct match of the PS5 performance mode graphics settings and trying them on my PC to see if I get the same performance or not.
You usually don't need a guide to optimize the settings. Just run 1440p DLSS Quality/Balanced and high settings with ultra textures and ultra texture filtering (you have the VRAM). Or 1080p if you still didn't upgrade.
Next step is DLSS Performance, then medium and finally low, but it will look bad.
From what I'm hearing in reviews, it sounds like no pc is ready for this game
kinda wild that the ps5 gpu effectively a 6700 non xt is way below anything they would suggest for ray tracing. even though they said every mode used it.
The first RT preset is called High RT, I assume the rest of the presets below would be medium and low, but that's just my speculation.
A game made for the PS4 (Aka AMD 4770 Gpu from 2013) should run on everything these days :)
This game was a PS5 only game. Maybe you wanted to say that that game was based on a PS4 game, but that is not really true either since you can fly in this one, and while flying the game world moves past you much faster.
To be fair Spider man 2 is a Sony game so it had to run at 60 fps high settings on a graphics card that's between a 6700 and a 6700XT that might be why the requirements are reasonable. It might not look as good as your Allan wake and Hellblade 2's.
anyone else noticed how the ryzen 7 7800x3d increased alot in price over the last half year?
140GB storage?! I ain't never downloading that.
its strange, cause on steam for game requirements, its 90gb or similar
@@StaceyJensenn Just looked this up and it confirmed my suspicions. Game developers need to account for additional temporary files created during gameplay, potential updates, save files, and future patches, which can significantly increase the space needed on your drive beyond the initial game installation size.
There have many games that require over 100GB of storage for several years now. Where have you been?
Miss out then
Its 2025 how is this still an issue?
1tb NVMEs are like 60 bucks.
Interesting how the maxed out setting at 4K require the 4090 and 12900k, but the 4070 is just high with raytracing high. I have a 4090 laptop, which is a little better than the 4070, but it's also similar at 1440p to how a 4090 performs at 4K. I imagine this game is quite a bit heavy on the CPU than we think.
A laptop with a 4090 is nasty work. There is absolutely barely any cooling at all 😆
@chriswheeler5808 the heating on mine isn't that bad. The issue is more on the cpu. If I keep the tdp at 65watts, it never goes above 90C, but then a cpu intensive game would be an issue like, for example, Dragon's Dogma 2.
@@eccentricbeing 90c is crazy
I have this on PS5 and they skipped out on DLC without warning or reasoning. Wolverine needs to release day one on PC but probably wont
''This item is currently unavailable in your region''
Nice
Yeah... same here
Sony PSN bullsh!t
just tested it, it eat vram like crazy, 15gb usage on my rx 6800 non xt even at 1440p with fsr :D rip all who owns 8 10 12gb gpus ^_^ normal RAM usage is also way above 16gb that they suggest, i get around 24 28gb usage with nothing running in background :D
It's not usage, it's allocation.
Games allocate more VRAM than what they actually use.
@@riven4121 adrenaline overlay shows allocation not usage?
@@NostalgicMem0ries If you download MSI afterburner and enable memory usage, this only shows allocation (this is what Adrenaline is showing). If you enable GPU dedicated memory usage \ process, that shows you the amount of memory the actual current process is actually using. Games tend to allocate as much memory as possible and releases it when it needs to be.
Adrenaline doesn't show actual utilisation.
@@riven4121 i just searched internet, all sites from official ones to various tech ones say adrenaline shows usage not allocation, the msi afterburner tho without some tweaks in settings shows allocation at first.
12900k or 7800x3D? They play in different leagues and put ultimate as a requirement......
In Spider-Man Remastered Intel performs unusually well, and the game scales unusually well with memory frequency (not latency). That said, if the 7800X3D is the first AMD CPU to break 60FPS with all the RT, and the 12900k is the first Intel CPU to break 60FPS, then they don't care that the 7800X3D is actually faster. It's just the minimum requirement.
THEY WILL PERFORM SAME IN 4K resolution with an RTX 4090 😂 Stop blindly believing in those " 720p " Benchmarks
@ Your answer falls short, because in the case that you also raise the 12700k or the 5800X3D
@@andersjjensen It's true but this is Spiderman 2 and it is optimized for the Ryzen processors of the PS5
@ Doesn't change the fact that the chart shows the first CPU's from either brand that A) Broke the requirement barrier, and B) They actually had on hand for testing.
This is a minimum requirements chart. Not a statement about equality.
The issue is they start the scale at 4070 top everything WITH frame gen half the time.
i wouldnt say "thats how you do it" when they wait till a day before release
I had to put all your recent videos ON so they could get viewership + HUB, derBauer, Tech YES City, Techtesters, 1Level but it was too messy to listen so I tunned it down.
I have to write a sentence here because im very annoyed of this: 30FPS regarding the mininum spec 720p is not what i would consider playable. So pls stop saying this.
This column is nonsense.
Does a gtx 1060, 1080 ti, 1070 or sometimes like that run this? Didnt found any videos yet.
You talked about scalibility , but as a game studio if u consider 720p @30fps a preset then yes, u will get a good scalibility , but who in real life would play at 720p @fps very low? next time they will add 480p 20 fps very low, and boom u got scalibility
Maybe they can call Asobo on how to fix MSFS 2020 and 2024. We need to buy a new 50 series with MFG just to get a decent frame rate…
Finally a Game my Laptop can actually run on reccomeded settings
Recommended in this case being 1080p 60 fps second to lowest graphic settings. If you are happy with this just buy a console for 1/5th of the price lol
@weeb_hunter Can you use a console as a laptop? And can the consoles play all Steam and Epic Games games that people coming from a PC have already bought?
@weeb_hunter Sure man. They should just buy a whole new console instead of using the laptop that they already have to play one game. No problems there!
@ It's always hilarious to see people wanting to influence and dictate how others live their lives
and what do you have? can your device run it on the recommended settings?
*THIS is HOW EVERY PC game MUST be DONE*
*Graphics scalability MUST be a RULE and not an EXCEPTION*
Love the content but please use dark reader extension for brighter backgrounds
Will it run on a ryzen 5 5600x gtx 1660 super and 16 gigs of ram?
Bc you know the specs are kinda high for how the game looks,i mean it looks amazing but it looks exactly like spiderman remastered
I really hope these are all at native resolution so I can just throw in some DLSS Balanced on my 4080 and play it at 4K60 highest RT settings
1440p high, newer 6 core CPU and rx 6800 is very realistic HW demand. If all game where like that it would be great..
till ps6 and next xbox i think that will be the norm
Cant believe i just got a 4070 ti super and its already not enough to run frickin spiderman at max settings