Fixed Effect, Random Effect v/s Pooled OLS Regression Model in Stata (Hindi)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 дек 2024

Комментарии • 33

  • @meenakshigautam9457
    @meenakshigautam9457 26 дней назад +1

    sir mera hausman test ka chi value 00.00 ara hai and prob value ki jagha koi value ni ari what should i do

    • @faiziweqar
      @faiziweqar  25 дней назад

      A chi-square value of 0.00 suggests that the fixed-effects and random-effects models are producing virtually identical results, making it impossible to statistically differentiate between them. However, this does not necessarily validate the random-effects model; it just indicates an inability to perform the Hausman test effectively.
      How to Solve the Issue
      1. Inspect the Data and Models: Check if the independent variables are highly collinear, which could lead to singular matrices. Moreover, ensure there is sufficient variability in the data.
      2. Use a Robust Hausman Test: Some software packages, like Stata, offer robust versions of the Hausman test (e.g., xtoverid command) that can handle singularity issues.

  • @gunjanvijay722
    @gunjanvijay722 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much Faisi .
    Really learned a lot and able to clear my doubts.
    Plz put more such videos😊

  • @shahriarkhan-b7m
    @shahriarkhan-b7m Год назад +1

    Very helpful . Many thanks

    • @faiziweqar
      @faiziweqar  Год назад

      I'm so glad it was helpful. Keep Learning.

  • @ruponbhowmick1722
    @ruponbhowmick1722 27 дней назад +1

    Sir very excellent information you have given
    Sir please make a video how to solve autocorrelation problem and a video on short run and long run model

    • @faiziweqar
      @faiziweqar  27 дней назад

      Thanks.
      For solving the autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity problems, you can employ robust standard errors.
      I will try to make a video on a short run and long run model in future.

    • @ruponbhowmick1722
      @ruponbhowmick1722 25 дней назад

      Ok and thank you

  • @AKGAMING-us1wq
    @AKGAMING-us1wq 7 месяцев назад +1

    Thakns a lot Dr Faizi ....

  • @dr.ejazanwer2493
    @dr.ejazanwer2493 2 года назад

    Marvellous presentation dear Faizi

  • @rebantsaud7505
    @rebantsaud7505 4 месяца назад

    but what is the comand for hereroskedasticity test for random effect sir

  • @rachnamathur130
    @rachnamathur130 Год назад

    very useful video ..Plz keep on posting

  • @Biswanator
    @Biswanator 6 месяцев назад

    Agar fixed model phele aaya toh xttest0 karna parega ?

  • @yousafkhankhalil8726
    @yousafkhankhalil8726 2 года назад

    best, knowledgeable and understandable

  • @Md.ShahnawazAlam-q8w
    @Md.ShahnawazAlam-q8w Год назад

    Very informative for beginners . lag hi rahi thi awaz jani pehchani ...jab channel pe nazar daudaya to malum hua ye to SZ ke buzurg hain.... Jazakallah

    • @faiziweqar
      @faiziweqar  Год назад

      I have employed this methodology in my research papers as well as in thesis. But when I have to use it again, I am not able to recall the whole process. So I decided to record the video for my personal use. But just because of fear that in any case if my laptop stops working due to any reason, i will lose that video, i uploaded it on RUclips. Till now, i have never promoted my channel or video, and except me and my wife, no one knows that I have a channel on RUclips.

    • @homosapien2921
      @homosapien2921 Год назад

      @@faiziweqar ye to aapki sadgi h Dr. Sb. Lekin aise content jisse logon ko knowledge mile to aise me apko waqt mile to aur effort lagayye aur meri rai me koi harz nahi h isme 🤲

    • @faiziweqar
      @faiziweqar  Год назад

      @Homo Sapien. Ji Insha Allah Zaroor.

  • @iramnaseem9253
    @iramnaseem9253 10 месяцев назад +1

    great job

  • @aniksaha9925
    @aniksaha9925 2 года назад

    Do i need to run GMM after hausman test going in favour of FEM in panel data analysis?
    If yes, how to interpret that output?
    >If in FEM 1 out 4 variables turned out to be significant at 5%; and in GMM, 2 (including that one from FEM) variables turn out to be significant, what to write in conclusion?
    How to interpret J statistic and prob(j-stat) from GMM?

  • @ghourigaming9007
    @ghourigaming9007 Год назад +1

    Good work

  • @rameshparajuli5223
    @rameshparajuli5223 2 года назад

    This is the best one.

  • @nishalcreation5064
    @nishalcreation5064 2 года назад

    A.O.A teacher my stata sheet don't recognized the xtserial now what I can do for this

  • @lovenepal8756
    @lovenepal8756 Год назад

    Very nice

  • @cmapawankumar9883
    @cmapawankumar9883 5 месяцев назад

    thank you

  • @RuhulAmin-th3zj
    @RuhulAmin-th3zj 2 года назад

    thanks a ton, sir.

  • @gunjanvijay722
    @gunjanvijay722 Год назад +1

    You are so fast .
    Plz be slow.

    • @faiziweqar
      @faiziweqar  Год назад

      Thanks.
      I'll try my best next time.

    • @NabihaMoeen
      @NabihaMoeen Год назад +1

      ​@@faiziweqarno fast...everything was perfect nd click on target 🎉... Thankyou jazakAllah❤❤..