The world doesn't like the CIA, not current, not former. The dot. Stay inside the US and don't stick your nose out. Cannot even hear him speak, unpleasant manner. The CIA are clearly brainwashed and it shines through any threads of them out. Yaks!
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
The best thing Americans can do is stay home and take care of their domestic issues. Please leave the world alone and stop deciding relations between others.
The US has no rational view of the world and never negotiates in good faith so it is useless for any interaction between Russia and US. The US never obeys terms of agreements. No one can cite a treaty or agreement it did not violate. Russia should focus on expanding trade through BRICS and just let the US continue its steady decline. I am an American who has been in 93 countries and every one of them the US has meddled in and violated agreements. I have been living in Russia 25 years and find it much more honest and livable than the US. Expanding BRICS and dealing only with honest reliable partners is the best path since the US controlled world is shrinking and failing. Europe is somehow surprised that their economies are crashing but the forget that they only grew rich when they colonised mst of the world and benefied from the free or almost free labor and resources of the world for 400 years. The decline now is only going to get worse now those captive states no longer supply the labor, soldiers and resources that made Europe wealthy are never going to be ruled and abused by Europe again. Europe will decline to its level of incompetence.
I totally disagree with Mr.Beebe. After what the United States has done, Russia doesn't owe America anything. The United States should be begging for forgiveness from Russia.
We may disagree but it’s also vitally important to know what these guys think as they unfortunately set up our policies - the proverbial guys in dark suits. Gotta listen to learn.
This. Western leaders have been a disgrace. I don't think he will, but as a British European, I'd like to see Putin teach the West a lesson. Not sure how he'd do it, but something needs to be done.
Russia is not the aggressor. The Washington warmongers are always the problem. Julian Assagne was correct in saying, " The US doesn't want to win a war. It wants continuous war." War is extremely profitable for the military industrial complex.
@ NO - Russia didn't want. Russia sends so much signals to USA and Europe but they didn't answer - there was no more discussion from the west side. Please do not mix things up only because you dont like Russia.
@@vlodkopawluk9203 Yes, for no good reason. Its not as if the Ukrainians had bio-labs, Bandera-Brigades, wanted to put Nato Missiles at their border with Russia and attacked the Russians in the Donbass. The Russians totally overreacted.
I find it very hard to trust former CIA officials. It may be unfair but considering the damage that the CIA do to the world, perhaps I can be forgiven.
He is delusional , nobody in their right mind thinks that Russia made a pact with N. Korea without China input and back door negotiation . Only a child or a lier thinks that Russia would undermine its strongest ally - China , for some small potatoes
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
NATO was established to keep the peace between European states as much as defend against Russia. Some European leaders seem afraid of the US pulling out of Europe. There are a number of hotspots in Europe, what would happen if the US left ?.
RUSSIANS JUST DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH EU AND OTHER NAZI SCUMS AT ALL JUST LEAVE US BE WE DON'T GIVE A F..KING ABOUT ANYTHING THAT IT IS HAPPENING WITH YOUR BS THERE
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
This so-called security issue in Europe was entirely manufactured by the US in the first place. The US deliberately laid the groundwork by pushing NATO east ward right up to Russia’s front door. The Europeans were stupid enough to go along for the ride. Russia in the late 1990s wanted to be part of Europe but was repeated rebuffed by Washington. Even so, Russia has never shown hostilities towards Europe at any time. In fact, Russia was very happy to provide cheap and abundant energy to Europe where everyone benefited. I disagree with the guest speaker that the US has a lot more leverage by broadening the Ukraine issue to the NATO level. Russia has all the leverage. It is the victor of this proxy war. US is the defeated party. Russia will dictate the terms, at both Ukraine and NATO level. Russia knows that the US is desperate to wash its hands in Ukraine. Russia also knows that NATO is a paper tiger. With Europe’s economy going down the toilet, the paper tiger will likely disintegrate on its own device. Russia can negotiate with European countries individually in due course. There is no longer a need for a “comprehensive” settlement. Moreover, Russia has already turned its back on Europe and has successfully found open arms from the east and the global majority. The bottom line is: the US is desperate to settle and retreat from Ukraine. The US is the seller. Russia will buy only at a suitable price. Moreover,
Well said. They manufactured Project Ukraine for over 20 years. To hear him talk about how Europe now have to take care of themself its disturbing when we know that US is the one who have caused the worst conflict's in Europe the last decades... Trying to create somekind of Stocholm syndrome?
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Why the "EU" feels worried about the USA leaving them to deal with Russia is quite strange. Surely they can see what the USA does to its "allies" and it is not a pretty sight! Look after your own populations, not by making enemies and relying on an obsolete NATO, but by cooperating within the EU and with other countries including China and Russia.
Noone in the EU is worried about USA leaving, its the so called ruling elites who base their power on the threat of US intervention against their own people, as you see in Moldova eight now and maybe in Romania as well. Propaganda, agitation, assassins and commandos, thats how those "elites" rule over european countries.
Well looking back at ww2 and ww3 can you blame us? Maybe start paying your nato bills. As an American , I do apologize for allowing our government to be filled with globalist. But EU is also infiltrated with globalist. We will expose the globalist corruption and try to live like you suggest. I hope the Europeans follow our lead.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
We seen what happened in ww1 and ww2. Stop pretending that Europe can survive without the USA. China would steam roll the EU and you guys would capitulate in one week. Is this what you desire? The real issue for the west is we voted in globalist politicians. Solve that problem and we can act like friends again. As Trump has said many times. China is the real adversary with wanting to become the world’s super power and they will be 100x’s worst than USA. Everyone knows this except you.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Early on, when former CIA chief and special advisor to Dick Cheney Beebe says “we (the US) thought our challenge in the world was to democratize other countries, reform them, and also find bad guys…” I had to chuckle. He knows better. It was always about US primacy in the world. He knows that, as does Alex and Glenn… and yet they didn’t offer much pushback to that fairytale statement. Oh, by the way, the Russians and Chinese also know this which is why these “negotiations” are going to be difficult. Pissing down their back and telling them it’s raining isn’t going to work… imho
Yes, he said that was wrong as they lost their ability in diplomacy. Didn’t you listen? Not all advisors get their ideas implemented. Also, hindsight is a wonderful thing. He was obviously very young when in that role.
George BeBe sounds very biased when it talks about the US, every politician in the US talks about "containing china" and "breaking out Russia" , clearly that's their mentality and it goes from the military to the media and finance. China and Russia are closer than ever because of the US aggressive views towards them. China knows if Russia falls the US will have no mercy with China. Alex Krainer has a very different view of geopolitics, about how we are not seeing the end of the US empire but the actual British empire on its last days. All roads lead back to London
👍 Yes as soon as I started listening to this guy, I felt it was about building some foundations between china and Russia, then building on that to gentle lever them apart, I don't think that will work, It is good we hear what he has to say, I think Alex and Glen are being very polite, because I don't think they think there's any weekness between Russia and China because that would just serve the belligerance of the US, UK and Western oligarchs regardless of Trump.
@@tonytroiani6599 ; Nah, I think the British man, Alexander Mercouris, whom is of Greek heretige (I think), and heads up a very important news outlet which goes by the name of "The Duran", will survive. We all make unhappy errors sometimes.
@Johnnycdrums Just because the Duran is an excellent platform for a clear understanding of geopolitics in particular Russia and Ukraine, dosn't mean you have to agree with everything. I think this guest exposed himself at the start of this discussion, but that's my opinion Anyway Alex and Alexander are an excellent listen in particular Alexander, being ferensic in his day to day Analysis and has becoming a must go to for everyone who want to have a clear understanding and who want to bring these horrifying modern day world events to an end 🍻
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
The best thing Trump can do after 100 days of negotiations (basically going through the motions) is to walk away from Ukraine. No meaningful treaty with Russians can pass the senate.
I doubt a treaty would pass but Trump has an ability to build good relationships with Russia. most republicans will follow him if he does that. The good thing is the other side doesn’t have an argument. We can’t just pay for an unending war with no objectives.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Sorry but not warming to this guy at all as he seems to be talking from this US elevated position still and is not grasping how the US has been detrimental to Europe, which he seems to suggest needs to strengthen itself, or its influence or stand on its own two feet. Perhaps if the US hadn't blown up Nordstream-2 and perhaps if Germany had its own proper sovereignty instead of bowing down to the US and still being under occupational rights of the US since WW2 and what about the US removing all those military bases. And what is the purpose of Nato, the Europeans cannot afford it and do we really think we are going to be invaded by Russia or China? Get rid of it, it should have been dismantled when the Warsaw pact ended.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Once CIA, always CIA-- most important thing we can do is not worried about the Dynamics of what happened since 2022. It's to admit that we started this disastrous in 2014.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
When this guest referred to China as a "challenge" to the US, it showed him up. If you view emergent international plurality as a challenge to US primacy, you're nothing but just another American exceptionalist. We need Americans who are excited over a redefined US role in the new plurality, not those who see it as challenge (this guest/ Trump/ Biden) or as triggering inevitable conflict due to "structural dynamics" (Mearshiemer).
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
@@TheRussianAngle they are trying to influence him and thus him others. That's not just the entertainment. We all should do things to influence the world. Not just sharing news and analyses.
@@vlodkopawluk9203Neo-Nazism. Ukrainian supremacy. Stephan Bandera led a Ukrainian armed extremist group in support of the German forces in WWII who killed hundreds of thousands of minoritiy peoples in the Ukraine, namely Poles and Jews during the war and post war against the Soviets. Bandrea as a prominent war criminal fled to the west but was tracked down in Austria by the KGB in 1962 and shot dead. His followers are known as Banderites and West Ukrainian nationalist praise him as a hero. Ukrainian leadrers often have his portrait on their office walls during interviews if you are attentive. Streets have been named sfter him and a statue in Lvov has been erected to his bloody memory. The Czech film Wolyn aka Hatred dramatizes his brutal campaign against the Poles. This film may still be available on Prime.
The CIA and US are to blame for the Ukrainian Neo Nazis coup in 2014. despicable and evil are the CIA to support Ukrainian Neo Nazis. The CIA were always Nazi sympathizers since after ww2. The U.S. relationship with Ukrainian fascists began after the Second World War. During the war, units of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) took part in the Holocaust, killing at least 100,000 Jews and Poles. Mykola Lebed, a top aide to Stepan Bandera, the leader of the fascist OUN-B, was recruited by the C.I.A. after the war, according to a 2010 study by the U.S. National Archives. The government study said, “Bandera’s wing (OUN/B) was a militant fascist organization.” Bandera’s closest deputy, Yaroslav Stetsko. From the start of the 2013-2014 events in Ukraine, Consortium News founder Robert Parry and other writers began providing the evidence NewsGuard says doesn’t exist, reporting extensively on the coup and the influential role of Ukraine’s neo-Nazis. At the time, corporate media also reported on the essential part neo-Nazis played in the coup. As The New York Times reported, the neo-Nazi group, Right Sector, had the key role in the violent ouster of Yanukovych. The role of neo-fascist groups in the uprising and its influence on Ukrainian society was well reported by mainstream media outlets at the time.The BBC, the NYT, the Daily Telegraph and CNN all reported on Right Sector, C14 and other extremists’ role in the overthrow of Yanukovych. The BBC ran this report a week after his ouster
@@janetjacks3406 No he did not say that China has to pay for it. He said China has to take big part in reconstruction. Of course China will not do this for free. But the fact itself that there wil be big commercial interests of China there wil be stabilising factor.
@@alexeydolzhenkov7424 Oh I see, yes I did go on to listen to where he said this and I cannot see this happening, not sure how the US would accept it anyway, found it a bizarre suggestion.
After almost 500 days of the elimination of innocent people and property in the Levant, it is getting harder and harder for me to listen three agency apologists who subsequently found a conscience that imperialism is evil yet they themselves participated in it until yesterday. We need commentators and analysts who did not participate in organizations that committed crimes in the past or present. Same is for proxy war in Ukraine.
Приходит Трамп и говорит,, заверните и положите мне вот ту штуку Гренландия называется,,. Да самое время поговорить об архитектуре европейской безопасности.
I love George's cold calculating eyes. This guy was part of the problem and now is offering the same talking points we've been hearing all this time. The Russians have shown extreme patience, how long this lasts remains to be seen. I certainly don't want to see the true capabilities of the Sarmat.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
What does Beebe know about what the Chinese think about Russian relationship with North Korea? The man speculates and his speculation have an innate western slant .
America needs to first sort out its own inter-agency conflicts, contrasts, and corruption. Then, maybe America can concern itself with wider diplomacy. America is part of the problem not the solution....not yet. First, get over 30 years of woke psychosis, and reorder your own house.
I really pray and hope that Usa would take away the usa- military bases from the Finland- Russia borders. It is good for Finland and Russia, that there is no threat on that border. We were never asked in our country if we wanted to join N. Our leaders desided about joining. It was a very big mistake. We 2 countries need to be in friendly realtionship! We both benefit that!
Unfortunately, I stopped watching this program when he started taking regarding Noord Korean involvement in the SMO. I am sick and tired of this propaganda
NATO should never have put a leader in who comes from one of the old colonial powers. This was the wrong time because you can see how warmongering Rutte wants to be. Bad move.
We know what Martyanov thinks. But it’s also vitally important to know what ‘these guys’ think as they unfortunately set up our policies. The proverbial guys in dark suits. Gotta listen to learn.
As soon as I started listening to this guy, I felt it was about building some foundations between china and Russia then building on that to gentle lever them apart, I don't think that will work, It is good we hear what he has to say, I think Alex and Glen are being very polite, because I don't think they think there's any weekness between Russia and China because that would just serve the belligerance of the US, UK and Western oligarchs regardless of Trump
I find it astonishing mr Duran and Gliessen actually give him the stage to spout his nonsense and let him off so uncriticized. It's revolting to see/hear.
The good thing about Trump is he has common sense. He isn’t trying to contain Russia. If the Russians are reasonable Trump will say so. If neocons in the senate get upset then Trump will ask them what their solution is and they don’t have any. The problem is nobody in congress or the media has been pointing that out. Trump is such a breath of fresh air
The central problem today is the insistence of Washington to view, as its national interest, the establishment and maintenance of world hegemony in all possible spheres, be it social, economic, political, military etc. This must change to a more cooperative, multipolar world as opposed to a US based unipolar system.
"US playing a stabilizing kind of role". ....ha ha ha what a joke. At this point I could no longer listen to this guys crap. Some "international politics expert" you found here. Get better guests.
Again mediators: there is indeed a shortage. You can no have an empire colony as any kind of mediator. So no NATO country, no EU country, no push over dependency of the US etc….
NATO (US) tried everything and more to force China to take their side (NATO). Rightly China said no! Adding that this was a legitimate issue of Russia's non existing security architecture. Abandoned by NATO to facilitate NATO assisted Ukrainian aggression against Russian speaking regions. That's the key issue ! Everything else is irrelevant...ie US/NATO interests! Ukraine was always a dependent region of Russia's economic power. Thus any peace agreement must with total satisfaction solve these issues! As Trump recently addressed, NATO is the aggressor with its creep up onto Russia's borders! Logically NATO must pull out of the region . That includes Starmers peace deal breaker 100 year military cooperation agreement. Which contradicts Russia's principal demands and objectives that Ukraine is demilitarised deNatoed and rid of all fascist groups from all aspects of Ukrainian politics and military participation.
The time for the Europeans to take more responsibility within NATO was when Europe really was capable to counterbalance Russia economically and diplomatically. That was in 2000 - 2005, before the crisis the US engineered in 2008. Now, Europe is only a shadow of its former self not only militarily but also economically and diplomatically, unable to do anything of meaning on the world stage
I haven't got to that bit yet but that would be shocking to hear, and ridiculous. Not sure i'm warming to this guy as he is making things way too complicated for my liking as the solution is simple, stop expanding NATO.
Alexander is frustrated because the Russians have been clear that concessions on Ukrainian terms are unacceptable. The CIA guy's view of finding a middle path as realism is unrealistic.
У всего есть конец, и государство за семью морями управляющее процессами издалека это редкое и недолгое событие, не надо так надуваться. Чем больше шкаф, тем громче падает.
LIKE. SHARE. COMMENT
Please join us on LOCALS: theduran.locals.com
You are from away.
You are not from the USA.
Commie bastards, always.
I care not for this Communist.
The world doesn't like the CIA, not current, not former. The dot. Stay inside the US and don't stick your nose out.
Cannot even hear him speak, unpleasant manner. The CIA are clearly brainwashed and it shines through any threads of them out. Yaks!
Washington didn't misunderstand anything about Russia's willingness to negotiate.. They just wanted the war to continue indefinitely.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
The best thing Americans can do is stay home and take care of their domestic issues. Please leave the world alone and stop deciding relations between others.
Not the best guest 😴
The US has no rational view of the world and never negotiates in good faith so it is useless for any interaction between Russia and US. The US never obeys terms of agreements. No one can cite a treaty or agreement it did not violate. Russia should focus on expanding trade through BRICS and just let the US continue its steady decline. I am an American who has been in 93 countries and every one of them the US has meddled in and violated agreements. I have been living in Russia 25 years and find it much more honest and livable than the US. Expanding BRICS and dealing only with honest reliable partners is the best path since the US controlled world is shrinking and failing. Europe is somehow surprised that their economies are crashing but the forget that they only grew rich when they colonised mst of the world and benefied from the free or almost free labor and resources of the world for 400 years. The decline now is only going to get worse now those captive states no longer supply the labor, soldiers and resources that made Europe wealthy are never going to be ruled and abused by Europe again. Europe will decline to its level of incompetence.
Russia says that exactly, go away
If the US leave NATO Western Europe will eat each other.
@spbstan 👍 An American who sees American exceptionalism in terms of leadership by example rather than by power. How absolutely rare. Thank you.
I totally disagree with Mr.Beebe. After what the United States has done, Russia doesn't owe America anything. The United States should be begging for forgiveness from Russia.
Agreed 💯
US administration is the evil on this whole planet
@@hippie4ever 👍💯%
We may disagree but it’s also vitally important to know what these guys think as they unfortunately set up our policies - the proverbial guys in dark suits. Gotta listen to learn.
"Anglo-American War on Russia" documentary series by Tales of the American Empire on FewTube > hundred coups in last century
This. Western leaders have been a disgrace. I don't think he will, but as a British European, I'd like to see Putin teach the West a lesson. Not sure how he'd do it, but something needs to be done.
The CIA guy is the pure embodiment of a human like snake.
Yeah these nkvd types .
you really understand he's just as dummy as nost American politicians!!
This guy is snakey and sleazy and a weasel.
i was thniking something similar. pure glowie
Nothing but pure propaganda without any analyse and thinking of the future is ok for you.
This guy is talking like USA is coming in to help some children fix their squabbles , when USA made the problem in the first place
This guy is 100 % accurate . Now children .
Russia is not the aggressor. The Washington warmongers are always the problem. Julian Assagne was correct in saying, " The US doesn't want to win a war. It wants continuous war." War is extremely profitable for the military industrial complex.
Exactly, the US is the world's terrorist
@@TheYeti308oh go away CIA stooge
I am so glad that many in Duran community are seeing through the glory think tankers rhetoric
Russia has talked, negotiated, signed deals, and then the West has shitted all over that, so it's no good saying 'Russia has to talk to us'.
correct - Russia did all it can. NO - Russia has not to start to talk to anyone - this guest of The Duran is wrong in so much points.
And then Russia invaded Ukraine because it wanted to
@ NO - Russia didn't want. Russia sends so much signals to USA and Europe but they didn't answer - there was no more discussion from the west side. Please do not mix things up only because you dont like Russia.
@@vlodkopawluk9203 Yes, for no good reason. Its not as if the Ukrainians had bio-labs, Bandera-Brigades, wanted to put Nato Missiles at their border with Russia and attacked the Russians in the Donbass. The Russians totally overreacted.
@@vlodkopawluk9203not because it wanted to, but because it had to! Get your head out of the sand!
I find it very hard to trust former CIA officials. It may be unfair but considering the damage that the CIA do to the world, perhaps I can be forgiven.
Exactly.
No different from the KGB or FSB then.
Some seem ok like Larry Johnson or Ray McGovern
Yes, the brainwashing is very strong and it's very rare that they can come out of that career and be able to see things with any clarity.
We Forgive you before we forgive them
People keep saying that China is unhappy with Russia cooperation with N Korea. Can someone point to any CHINESE statements that support this?
EXACTLY 💯
Its in Chinese 😂
He is delusional , nobody in their right mind thinks that Russia made a pact with N. Korea without China input and back door negotiation . Only a child or a lier thinks that Russia would undermine its strongest ally - China , for some small potatoes
@@peterahmu rosetta stone 🙂
@@peterahmu I think so - not so much american politician can read chinese. I think this is only a guess to spread unrest.
Russia is not our enemy. Greetings from Australia.
Your government is !!
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
@@ARCofRESISTANCE yet australia is a police state and 90% Australians are just brainwashed worse than EU or US.
❤The US is a mess and must take care of itself.
Like it was said many years ago... Gringo Go Home (And STAY HOME)
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Russia should be a part of the security solution in Europe, perhaps the US should not.
NATO was established to keep the peace between European states as much as defend against Russia.
Some European leaders seem afraid of the US pulling out of Europe. There are a number of
hotspots in Europe, what would happen if the US left ?.
Outstanding comment
RUSSIANS JUST DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH EU AND OTHER NAZI SCUMS AT ALL JUST LEAVE US BE WE DON'T GIVE A F..KING ABOUT ANYTHING THAT IT IS HAPPENING WITH YOUR BS THERE
Isn't ironic to hear CIA operatives with whom all problems are starting?
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
This so-called security issue in Europe was entirely manufactured by the US in the first place. The US deliberately laid the groundwork by pushing NATO east ward right up to Russia’s front door. The Europeans were stupid enough to go along for the ride.
Russia in the late 1990s wanted to be part of Europe but was repeated rebuffed by Washington. Even so, Russia has never shown hostilities towards Europe at any time. In fact, Russia was very happy to provide cheap and abundant energy to Europe where everyone benefited.
I disagree with the guest speaker that the US has a lot more leverage by broadening the Ukraine issue to the NATO level. Russia has all the leverage. It is the victor of this proxy war. US is the defeated party. Russia will dictate the terms, at both Ukraine and NATO level. Russia knows that the US is desperate to wash its hands in Ukraine. Russia also knows that NATO is a paper tiger. With Europe’s economy going down the toilet, the paper tiger will likely disintegrate on its own device. Russia can negotiate with European countries individually in due course. There is no longer a need for a “comprehensive” settlement.
Moreover, Russia has already turned its back on Europe and has successfully found open arms from the east and the global majority.
The bottom line is: the US is desperate to settle and retreat from Ukraine. The US is the seller. Russia will buy only at a suitable price.
Moreover,
+100% !!!
Absolutely.
Well said. They manufactured Project Ukraine for over 20 years.
To hear him talk about how Europe now have to take care of themself its disturbing when we know that US is the one who have caused the worst conflict's in Europe the last decades... Trying to create somekind of Stocholm syndrome?
You are absolutely right!
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Mr Beebe still thinks the US is relevant in the world🤣
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Why the "EU" feels worried about the USA leaving them to deal with Russia is quite strange. Surely they can see what the USA does to its "allies" and it is not a pretty sight! Look after your own populations, not by making enemies and relying on an obsolete NATO, but by cooperating within the EU and with other countries including China and Russia.
Noone in the EU is worried about USA leaving, its the so called ruling elites who base their power on the threat of US intervention against their own people, as you see in Moldova eight now and maybe in Romania as well.
Propaganda, agitation, assassins and commandos, thats how those "elites" rule over european countries.
Well looking back at ww2 and ww3 can you blame us? Maybe start paying your nato bills. As an American , I do apologize for allowing our government to be filled with globalist. But EU is also infiltrated with globalist. We will expose the globalist corruption and try to live like you suggest. I hope the Europeans follow our lead.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
It's high time U.S left Europe
We seen what happened in ww1 and ww2. Stop pretending that Europe can survive without the USA. China would steam roll the EU and you guys would capitulate in one week. Is this what you desire? The real issue for the west is we voted in globalist politicians. Solve that problem and we can act like friends again. As Trump has said many times. China is the real adversary with wanting to become the world’s super power and they will be 100x’s worst than USA. Everyone knows this except you.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
NATO needs to understand that playing Russian roulette with a nuclear superpower is never a good idea.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Early on, when former CIA chief and special advisor to Dick Cheney Beebe says “we (the US) thought our challenge in the world was to democratize other countries, reform them, and also find bad guys…” I had to chuckle. He knows better. It was always about US primacy in the world. He knows that, as does Alex and Glenn… and yet they didn’t offer much pushback to that fairytale statement. Oh, by the way, the Russians and Chinese also know this which is why these “negotiations” are going to be difficult. Pissing down their back and telling them it’s raining isn’t going to work… imho
Yes, he said that was wrong as they lost their ability in diplomacy. Didn’t you listen? Not all advisors get their ideas implemented. Also, hindsight is a wonderful thing. He was obviously very young when in that role.
George BeBe sounds very biased when it talks about the US, every politician in the US talks about "containing china" and "breaking out Russia" , clearly that's their mentality and it goes from the military to the media and finance. China and Russia are closer than ever because of the US aggressive views towards them. China knows if Russia falls the US will have no mercy with China. Alex Krainer has a very different view of geopolitics, about how we are not seeing the end of the US empire but the actual British empire on its last days. All roads lead back to London
Yes, London is the bad guy.
👍 Yes as soon as I started listening to this guy, I felt it was about building some foundations between china and Russia, then building on that to gentle lever them apart, I don't think that will work, It is good we hear what he has to say, I think Alex and Glen are being very polite, because I don't think they think there's any weekness between Russia and China because that would just serve the belligerance of the US, UK and Western oligarchs regardless of Trump.
@@tonytroiani6599 ; Nah, I think the British man, Alexander Mercouris, whom is of Greek heretige (I think), and heads up a very important news outlet which goes by the name of "The Duran", will survive.
We all make unhappy errors sometimes.
@Johnnycdrums Just because the Duran is an excellent platform for a clear understanding of geopolitics in particular Russia and Ukraine, dosn't mean you have to agree with everything. I think this guest exposed himself at the start of this discussion, but that's my opinion Anyway Alex and Alexander are an excellent listen in particular Alexander, being ferensic in his day to day Analysis and has becoming a must go to for everyone who want to have a clear understanding and who want to bring these horrifying modern day world events to an end 🍻
The u.s. has no diplomatic skill. 😂. Just threats and bullying tactics. 😂🤣
His voice and speech manner ARE SO UNPLEASANT
This guy is so humble,speaking on behalf of the by far biggest warmonger Nation in the world...
@ErikIng-jv7xr he is just annoying as the whole package.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
The content of his reasoning is utter nonsense too
@Shryce that's what i mean, he is so filled with crap, that it just cannot stay inside and pours out
Pay back $300 billion plus interest. Repair & reinstate Nordstream 1 & 2 at US / UK cost, drop all Sanctions, and then Talks can resume.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
The best thing Trump can do after 100 days of negotiations (basically going through the motions) is to walk away from Ukraine. No meaningful treaty with Russians can pass the senate.
I doubt a treaty would pass but Trump has an ability to build good relationships with Russia. most republicans will follow him if he does that.
The good thing is the other side doesn’t have an argument. We can’t just pay for an unending war with no objectives.
the hegemonic thoughts are evidently still thick, and how desperately it is being held on to. thank you duran for bringing this awareness
These are American Phantasies presented as solutions
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
🤷🏼♀️Are we after three years back to square one and discover 'no NATO expansion eastwards'..? Oh boy...
It would seem so 🤔😞
2.000.000 dead to triple MIC value ... bargain for the gouls who hold stocks and aren't subject to be drafted...
Good point,i dont know if theyre running out of guests to have on the show,but I find it strange to have this guy on.
Only the stupid took three years
so, any mention of the-MIC-gets your posts deleted??
Sorry but not warming to this guy at all as he seems to be talking from this US elevated position still and is not grasping how the US has been detrimental to Europe, which he seems to suggest needs to strengthen itself, or its influence or stand on its own two feet. Perhaps if the US hadn't blown up Nordstream-2 and perhaps if Germany had its own proper sovereignty instead of bowing down to the US and still being under occupational rights of the US since WW2 and what about the US removing all those military bases. And what is the purpose of Nato, the Europeans cannot afford it and do we really think we are going to be invaded by Russia or China? Get rid of it, it should have been dismantled when the Warsaw pact ended.
Let's just see if NATO survives at all in the next few years.
it will
@vlodkopawluk9203
It is already showing cracks.
Driving wedges between foreign neighbors has been the entire focus and entire failure of US foreign policy in last 100 years
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Once CIA, always CIA-- most important thing we can do is not worried about the Dynamics of what happened since 2022. It's to admit that we started this disastrous in 2014.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
When this guest referred to China as a "challenge" to the US, it showed him up. If you view emergent international plurality as a challenge to US primacy, you're nothing but just another American exceptionalist.
We need Americans who are excited over a redefined US role in the new plurality, not those who see it as challenge (this guest/ Trump/ Biden) or as triggering inevitable conflict due to "structural dynamics" (Mearshiemer).
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
The guy litterally sais: " Nato's only leverage is terrorism".
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
How cute! He thinks Zalinskyy has a future in Ukraine, lol.
A former director from there ? On duran ? What a timeline we live in.
He's still pursuing the neocon goals. Lots of false and manipulative statements during this discussion.
It's OK to have a guest from "the other side". But it's another thing to begin every other sentence by agreeing with what said guest is peddling.
@@stanleywong58 I think its a way to manage the extremely opposite views without resorting to violence.
Does your Cia guest know that Russia`s terms are what matters? I kept waiting for him to say something.
Of course not... Russia doesn't pay his salary... he only talks American delusional talking points.
As I listen to this American, I get a crawling down my back, the DC self belief that they are better is oozing from him.
CIA Beebe could bot succeed without being void of integrity, honesty, courage... Is The Durand having trouble booking legitimate guests?
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
@@TheRussianAngle they are trying to influence him and thus him others. That's not just the entertainment. We all should do things to influence the world. Not just sharing news and analyses.
This guy has a degree in stating the obvious - very poor.
listening to this former Agent tells me the real problem is again CCCiiiiAAAA.
This guy is final proof why Russia has no one to talk to in US. He is wrong on every point.
100%
You overlooked the Nazi problem in Ukraine, how to remove the Banderas ideology without the total destruction of Ukraine?
So what is the Bandera ideology?
US never adressed the Nazi problem in Ukraine. Maybe because they always were a part of the big plan to get the war started
@@vlodkopawluk9203Neo-Nazism. Ukrainian supremacy. Stephan Bandera led a Ukrainian armed extremist group in support of the German forces in WWII who killed hundreds of thousands of minoritiy peoples in the Ukraine, namely Poles and Jews during the war and post war against the Soviets. Bandrea as a prominent war criminal fled to the west but was tracked down in Austria by the KGB in 1962 and shot dead. His followers are known as Banderites and West Ukrainian nationalist praise him as a hero. Ukrainian leadrers often have his portrait on their office walls during interviews if you are attentive. Streets have been named sfter him and a statue in Lvov has been erected to his bloody memory. The Czech film Wolyn aka Hatred dramatizes his brutal campaign against the Poles. This film may still be available on Prime.
The CIA and US are to blame for the Ukrainian Neo Nazis coup in 2014. despicable and evil are the CIA to support Ukrainian Neo Nazis. The CIA were always Nazi sympathizers since after ww2. The U.S. relationship with Ukrainian fascists began after the Second World War. During the war, units of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) took part in the Holocaust, killing at least 100,000 Jews and Poles. Mykola Lebed, a top aide to Stepan Bandera, the leader of the fascist OUN-B, was recruited by the C.I.A. after the war, according to a 2010 study by the U.S. National Archives.
The government study said, “Bandera’s wing (OUN/B) was a militant fascist organization.” Bandera’s closest deputy, Yaroslav Stetsko. From the start of the 2013-2014 events in Ukraine, Consortium News founder Robert Parry and other writers began providing the evidence NewsGuard says doesn’t exist, reporting extensively on the coup and the influential role of Ukraine’s neo-Nazis. At the time, corporate media also reported on the essential part neo-Nazis played in the coup. As The New York Times reported, the neo-Nazi group, Right Sector, had the key role in the violent ouster of Yanukovych. The role of neo-fascist groups in the uprising and its influence on Ukrainian society was well reported by mainstream media outlets at the time.The BBC, the NYT, the Daily Telegraph and CNN all reported on Right Sector, C14 and other extremists’ role in the overthrow of Yanukovych. The BBC ran this report a week after his ouster
UK, France and USA must pay for the reconstruction of Ukraine and Novarussia, not China!
Does he really say that? That would be an insane position.
Don't worry BlackRock was probably on it from day one
@@janetjacks3406 No he did not say that China has to pay for it. He said China has to take big part in reconstruction. Of course China will not do this for free. But the fact itself that there wil be big commercial interests of China there wil be stabilising factor.
@@alexeydolzhenkov7424 Oh I see, yes I did go on to listen to where he said this and I cannot see this happening, not sure how the US would accept it anyway, found it a bizarre suggestion.
After almost 500 days of the elimination of innocent people and property in the Levant, it is getting harder and harder for me to listen three agency apologists who subsequently found a conscience that imperialism is evil yet they themselves participated in it until yesterday. We need commentators and analysts who did not participate in organizations that committed crimes in the past or present. Same is for proxy war in Ukraine.
Islam needs refom.
Beebe is one and are you suggesting that Diesen and The Duran fellow are CIA assets?
Isn't George way of thinking part of the problem,Americans is ALWAYS looking for leverage over other parties.
All parts do and should do that. Doesn't Russians think about their goals?
@@skogstorpsvagen Other countries have Limits for what they are Willing to do..
That’s what people do in negotiations and that’s what every nation does
@@skogstorpsvagen Other countries got
Moral limits
@ErikIng-jv7xr Putin and moral in the same sentence is absurd
33 min and I am out , I just can't !!
7 minutes in... and he already makes me vomit.
Biden & his adminstration the worst ever, these dorks have done so much damage jesus christ 😢😢😢😢😢
Just think Hillary Clinton can go to her grave knowing she wasent the worst secretary of state
Alexander, it is thanks to such people as your guest that the current geopolitical situation has developed. Deranged people!
If we need a peace agreement in Europe it must be based on mutual trust but not on NATO presence.
Приходит Трамп и говорит,, заверните и положите мне вот ту штуку Гренландия называется,,. Да самое время поговорить об архитектуре европейской безопасности.
Staggering that this guy was a CIA director.
Good morning, everyone, from Ireland. 💚🇮🇪
Who is George kidding! The USA'S MIC is so dependant on controversies with Russia... USA will never come to any understandings with Russia.
Any agreement proposed bh Trump has to bs done on Russia's terms.
I love George's cold calculating eyes. This guy was part of the problem and now is offering the same talking points we've been hearing all this time. The Russians have shown extreme patience, how long this lasts remains to be seen. I certainly don't want to see the true capabilities of the Sarmat.
These very clever, indeed erudite and knowledgeable men never mention 9/11 any more, yet 9/11 is crucial in the understanding of why the Neocons cannot contemplate an end to their relentless push against Russia and any other power not subject to U.S./western domination. Keep in mind the seven primary regime change targets. These were of course not the ONLY regime change targets. ALL nations and indeed individuals not accepting U.S./western domination were to be eliminated and replaced. Agreeing to let Russia alone would mitigate irrevocably against this Neocon goal. And this goal stems DIRECTLY from the events of 9/11. Of course the goal has aspects that came before 9/11 but 9/11 is the point of launch whereby the Neocons saw it was doable. And this is why it is a huge mistake not to take 9/11 into your calculations when talking of a new security architecture for Europe including Russia. This is the most absolute form of geopolitical anathema for the Neocons. It would represent a totally unacceptable halting of their determined resolve, to achieve complete and utter global domination in perpetuity for the sake, in their minds, of all they hold to be sacrosanct in terms of the western superiority of view, systems and right to rule.
Greetings from South Africa BRICS + with appreciation.
❤😊RUSSIA CONTINUES TO DOMINATE.
💪💪🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💯💯💯💯💯 thank God Russia is very strong,
@Samson-j9y 🙂❤️THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
Traditionalism
👍😁
What does Beebe know about what the Chinese think about Russian relationship with North Korea? The man speculates and his speculation have an innate western slant .
America needs to first sort out its own inter-agency conflicts, contrasts, and corruption. Then, maybe America can concern itself with wider diplomacy. America is part of the problem not the solution....not yet. First, get over 30 years of woke psychosis, and reorder your own house.
I really pray and hope that Usa would take away the usa- military bases from the Finland- Russia borders. It is good for Finland and Russia, that there is no threat on that border.
We were never asked in our country if we wanted to join N. Our leaders desided about joining. It was a very big mistake. We 2 countries need to be in friendly realtionship! We both benefit that!
@@airilammi4140 And from everywhere in Europe
Unfortunately, I stopped watching this program when he started taking regarding Noord Korean involvement in the SMO. I am sick and tired of this propaganda
Yes! He snuck it in without pushback
NATO should never have put a leader in who comes from one of the old colonial powers. This was the wrong time because you can see how warmongering Rutte wants to be. Bad move.
Russia is not our enemy, greetings form Netherlands.
I'd like to have had Martyanov in there to help Beebe get a better understanding of Russia.
We know what Martyanov thinks. But it’s also vitally important to know what ‘these guys’ think as they unfortunately set up our policies. The proverbial guys in dark suits. Gotta listen to learn.
WHY is this person a guest on this show? Does anyone have a good answer for that?🤷
Good morning from Sweden to all 👍❤️❤️
He's a Commie.
Good debate. I think The Duran should invite Max Blumenthal.
Did you even watch the video ?
As soon as I started listening to this guy, I felt it was about building some foundations between china and Russia then building on that to gentle lever them apart, I don't think that will work, It is good we hear what he has to say, I think Alex and Glen are being very polite, because I don't think they think there's any weekness between Russia and China because that would just serve the belligerance of the US, UK and Western oligarchs regardless of Trump
Why would Russia compromise knowing Minsk 1,2 & Ankara! And the unilateral withdrawing from SALT treaties.
I would not believe a thing this guy says.
If he's still working for the 'company', I probably don't really need to hear a thing he says. Sorry.
I find it astonishing mr Duran and Gliessen actually give him the stage to spout his nonsense and let him off so uncriticized. It's revolting to see/hear.
The good thing about Trump is he has common sense. He isn’t trying to contain Russia. If the Russians are reasonable Trump will say so. If neocons in the senate get upset then Trump will ask them what their solution is and they don’t have any. The problem is nobody in congress or the media has been pointing that out. Trump is such a breath of fresh air
The other thing to remember, let's first just let Trump get into office, there's a big difference between theory and practice!
I see a little snake in the grass 🐍🐍
The central problem today is the insistence of Washington to view, as its national interest, the establishment and maintenance of world hegemony in all possible spheres, be it social, economic, political, military etc. This must change to a more cooperative, multipolar world as opposed to a US based unipolar system.
❤😊THE DURAN ARE SIMPLY THE BEST.
What Russia would talk with NATO about if NATO officially claim that its goal is to defeat Russia on a battlefield ?
I doubt Russians are in a hurry
I think Putin is fairer and more balanced than people realize.
The military industrial complex wanted this war to continue. This is the bottom line.
"US playing a stabilizing kind of role". ....ha ha ha what a joke.
At this point I could no longer listen to this guys crap.
Some "international politics expert" you found here.
Get better guests.
An article was published stating that Chinese parts are used in US military equipment to a larger volume than once thought.
Europe counterbalance Russia?! lol
I appreciate the importance of listening to people I don't agree with. Thanks for having this guest!
I refuse to listen to this man.
repulsive sc@m i agree
Again mediators: there is indeed a shortage. You can no have an empire colony as any kind of mediator. So no NATO country, no EU country, no push over dependency of the US etc….
Have an election in Ukraine give the people a president they want not one they were given then negotiating would be just.
I though NATO was really there in fear of German aggression.
Do you mean in the second world war? Nato was formed well after WW2 as part of the cold war against Russia, that was it's sole mandate.
If you see things with conflict and not a solution. You're part of the problem! Stop treating others like enemies.
Well.. he is CIA.... he is part of the cause of the problem...
NATO (US) tried everything and more to force China to take their side (NATO). Rightly China said no! Adding that this was a legitimate issue of Russia's non existing security architecture. Abandoned by NATO to facilitate NATO assisted Ukrainian aggression against Russian speaking regions.
That's the key issue ! Everything else is irrelevant...ie US/NATO interests! Ukraine was always a dependent region of Russia's economic power.
Thus any peace agreement must with total satisfaction solve these issues! As Trump recently addressed, NATO is the aggressor with its creep up onto Russia's borders! Logically NATO must pull out of the region . That includes Starmers peace deal breaker 100 year military cooperation agreement. Which contradicts Russia's principal demands and objectives that Ukraine is demilitarised deNatoed and rid of all fascist groups from all
aspects of Ukrainian politics and military participation.
This guy cannot deny he is look8ng at things through American eues.
Washington should stop interfering in other countries affairs. This guy is totally insignificant and flawed.
Only when Russia starts capturing territory Ukraine territory apart from Crimea and the four Oblasts will Ukraine and NATO be worried and cry halt
Mister Putin have said the whole time he wants to talk 👍🇷🇺
The time for the Europeans to take more responsibility within NATO was when Europe really was capable to counterbalance Russia economically and diplomatically. That was in 2000 - 2005, before the crisis the US engineered in 2008.
Now, Europe is only a shadow of its former self not only militarily but also economically and diplomatically, unable to do anything of meaning on the world stage
And 100% self-invoked dependent on the USA.. complete slaves to the USA whims... who aim to destroy their autonomy.
That article by Ian Proud in "Responsible Statecraft" of how to get peace in Ukraine is delusion of the highest order.
Good comments slightly different view which is interesting.
But had to laugh when he said China should pay for the rebuild of Ukraine 😂
I haven't got to that bit yet but that would be shocking to hear, and ridiculous. Not sure i'm warming to this guy as he is making things way too complicated for my liking as the solution is simple, stop expanding NATO.
They like things like that. But it comes with a string off course
To create a war between to neighboor countries and then suggest that theyre "enemy"should pay the bill. I rest my case
Alexander seems literally incapable of asking a question
Alexander is frustrated because the Russians have been clear that concessions on Ukrainian terms are unacceptable. The CIA guy's view of finding a middle path as realism is unrealistic.
So much of what he says goes against what Alex have said earlier,but still,No critic from him or Glenn..
@ErikIng-jv7xryeah but it’s a discussion to get his point of view and not a debate. That’s how I take it.
@@Slushpuppy-d6d I agreed on that, but some question from them would still be fine on that frame
@@Slushpuppy-d6d well it sucks debate is better than just agree with bs
У всего есть конец, и государство за семью морями управляющее процессами издалека это редкое и недолгое событие, не надо так надуваться. Чем больше шкаф, тем громче падает.
Excellent discussion, gentlemen