Brother Stephen you are a true inspiration and a blessing with all the knowledge that you share with the people so that we may understand scripture and not be deceived by all that is happening in our last days. May God bless you and your family and I thank God for helping me to find you to help me understand the truth.
Leviticus 16 coupled with John 20 tells us about the first time in history when God forgave our sins. It was on Resurrection morning! Adventist teach that Jesus didn't go before the Father until October 22, 1844. Here is what Ellen White wrote in Great Controversy p. 426, "The coming of Christ as our high priest to the most holy place, for the cleansing of the sanctuary, brought to view in Daniel 8:14; the coming of the Son of man to the Ancient of Days, as presented in Daniel 7:13; and the coming of the Lord to His temple, foretold by Malachi, are descriptions of the same event." If you read pages 426-430, you will find she places Christ going before the Father at this time, 1884, rather than following the New Testament that He immediately went into the Father's presence at the resurrection. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Her position on 1844 is filled with error and leads people away from the Biblical teaching that the death and resurrection of Christ secured our redemption and that we live in a continual state of assurance if we continue to abide in Him and He in us, John 15.The leadership of the Adventist church teach that we cannot have this assurance and, according to Ellen White, we should never say we are saved.
@@tonyrusso1363 Praise Jesus, I thank God that you have read the great controversy by Elle white, Its prudent to know that jesus entered into the most holy place of the heavenly santuary in 1844 as the bible reached
@@emilyabonyo8615 Emily, the 1844 teaching is largely based on the Fall Feast of the Day of Atonement. As you know, that Feast day falls somewhere between September-October. Here's the crux of the matter. The New Testament proclaims all the feast day, from Passover to the Day of Atonement to be completed in Christ. These are the writing of ordinances the Apostle Paul refers to in Col 2:16 as well as many other references. Since the Feast days are all fulfilled in Christ, the date given by Adventist, October 22nd, cannot be used as a prophetic date. If this is true, and it is, October 22, 1844, is nothing more than proof-texting. Even William Miller discovered his findings of the 2300 evenings and mornings, as not correct. Find out for yourself, (from the Bible) the Feast Days were fulfilled when Jesus died. 1844 is a sham contrived in part by her husband and a few of his comrades. It isn't difficult to verify these things.
Revelation 12:1 was a prophecy about the future that John saw not the past. Its referring to the birth of the very elect, the last of firstfruits, at the very end just before great tribulation. Which we are enduring with patience right now. Jesus has already returned if hes living IN YOU.
I have a question for pastor Bohr. Could you please explain how you understand verses 2-3 and 17 of chapter 7 of Daniel. “Daniel spake and said, I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea. And four great beasts CAME UP FROM THE SEA , diverse one from another. (Past tense) Gabriel explaining These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, which SHALL ARISE OUT OF THE EARTH.” ( still future) Daniel 7:2-3, 17 KJV What implications does this have upon the prophetic explanations ? • we know that Babylon has already risen and it was on its going down hill from that point on. It was the 1st year of Belshazzar co-ruling with his dad Nabonidus. EGW tells us Belshazzar was 15 yrs old. Also when Grecia is introduced in this chapter it is introduced in the stage when the empire was already divided after the battle of Ipsus in BC 301. •Why was not Alexander the Great implicated in this vision? •what is the significance of this? My thoughts take me to 1798 when a Kingdom will rise out of the earth , peacefully and not much population. Could this chapter be showing us a repetition of this kingdom at a spiritual level that we have not seen yet?
Where in the Torah is Rome ? I've read from Genesis 1 to Malachi and I see no such thing. I know this may seem rather asinine because most churches say this. But am I in the wrong in saying it is completely theoretical ? However, to be more accurate and to use scripture to interpret scripture, it would be safe to say the reason why the two kingdoms of Daniel 2, Daniel 7, Daniel 10. 11. 12, and Revelation 13 are not spoken of by name is because they was already spoken of by name in the Torah. Over and over and over and over. The two kingdoms are two kingdoms which have a total of 12 kings over them. This kingdom is divided between a north and a south. The north is political and the south is extremely religious. I can't for the life of me figure out who this could possibly be talking about. With that being said, I could definitely see why Rome in the 1800s was viewed as this. But again we are interpreting scripture by using scripture. There is a another kingdom (in this case, two kingdoms that are divided) that are very much spoken in scripture. And hold far more significance and importance than the theoretical point of view of Rome. These two kingdoms which are of the same authority that have 12 kings over them, one religious and one political is very much biblical.
Thank you for this study.
Wonderful! Very detailed and a great blessing to me. Thank you to God first then to Pastor Bhor his minister🌹
A very good study
God bless you Pastor Bohr.
Brother Stephen you are a true inspiration and a blessing with all the knowledge that you share with the people so that we may understand scripture and not be deceived by all that is happening in our last days. May God bless you and your family and I thank God for helping me to find you to help me understand the truth.
Leviticus 16 coupled with John 20 tells us about the first time in history when God forgave our sins. It was on Resurrection morning! Adventist teach that Jesus didn't go before the Father until October 22, 1844. Here is what Ellen White wrote in Great Controversy p. 426, "The coming of Christ as our high priest to the most holy place, for the cleansing of the sanctuary, brought to view in Daniel 8:14; the coming of the Son of man to the Ancient of Days, as presented in Daniel 7:13; and the coming of the Lord to His temple, foretold by Malachi, are descriptions of the same event." If you read pages 426-430, you will find she places Christ going before the Father at this time, 1884, rather than following the New Testament that He immediately went into the Father's presence at the resurrection. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Her position on 1844 is filled with error and leads people away from the Biblical teaching that the death and resurrection of Christ secured our redemption and that we live in a continual state of assurance if we continue to abide in Him and He in us, John 15.The leadership of the Adventist church teach that we cannot have this assurance and, according to Ellen White, we should never say we are saved.
@@tonyrusso1363
Praise Jesus, I thank God that you have read the great controversy by Elle white,
Its prudent to know that jesus entered into the most holy place of the heavenly santuary in 1844 as the bible reached
@@emilyabonyo8615 Emily, the 1844 teaching is largely based on the Fall Feast of the Day of Atonement. As you know, that Feast day falls somewhere between September-October. Here's the crux of the matter. The New Testament proclaims all the feast day, from Passover to the Day of Atonement to be completed in Christ. These are the writing of ordinances the Apostle Paul refers to in Col 2:16 as well as many other references. Since the Feast days are all fulfilled in Christ, the date given by Adventist, October 22nd, cannot be used as a prophetic date. If this is true, and it is, October 22, 1844, is nothing more than proof-texting. Even William Miller discovered his findings of the 2300 evenings and mornings, as not correct. Find out for yourself, (from the Bible) the Feast Days were fulfilled when Jesus died. 1844 is a sham contrived in part by her husband and a few of his comrades. It isn't difficult to verify these things.
Amen 🙏
The little horn is the RCC
Revelation 12:1 was a prophecy about the future that John saw not the past. Its referring to the birth of the very elect, the last of firstfruits, at the very end just before great tribulation. Which we are enduring with patience right now.
Jesus has already returned if hes living IN YOU.
I have a question for pastor Bohr.
Could you please explain how you understand verses 2-3 and 17 of chapter 7 of Daniel.
“Daniel spake and said, I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea. And four great beasts CAME UP FROM THE SEA , diverse one from another. (Past tense)
Gabriel explaining
These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, which SHALL ARISE OUT OF THE EARTH.” ( still future)
Daniel 7:2-3, 17 KJV
What implications does this have upon the prophetic explanations ?
• we know that Babylon has already risen and it was on its going down hill from that point on. It was the 1st year of Belshazzar co-ruling with his dad Nabonidus. EGW tells us Belshazzar was 15 yrs old.
Also when Grecia is introduced in this chapter it is introduced in the stage when the empire was already divided after the battle of Ipsus in BC 301.
•Why was not Alexander the Great implicated in this vision?
•what is the significance of this?
My thoughts take me to 1798 when a Kingdom will rise out of the earth , peacefully and not much population.
Could this chapter be showing us a repetition of this kingdom at a spiritual level that we have not seen yet?
Where in the Torah is Rome ? I've read from Genesis 1 to Malachi and I see no such thing. I know this may seem rather asinine because most churches say this. But am I in the wrong in saying it is completely theoretical ? However, to be more accurate and to use scripture to interpret scripture, it would be safe to say the reason why the two kingdoms of Daniel 2, Daniel 7, Daniel 10. 11. 12, and Revelation 13 are not spoken of by name is because they was already spoken of by name in the Torah. Over and over and over and over. The two kingdoms are two kingdoms which have a total of 12 kings over them. This kingdom is divided between a north and a south. The north is political and the south is extremely religious. I can't for the life of me figure out who this could possibly be talking about. With that being said, I could definitely see why Rome in the 1800s was viewed as this. But again we are interpreting scripture by using scripture. There is a another kingdom (in this case, two kingdoms that are divided) that are very much spoken in scripture. And hold far more significance and importance than the theoretical point of view of Rome. These two kingdoms which are of the same authority that have 12 kings over them, one religious and one political is very much biblical.