I have always believed the fatal shot came from the front, not the rear. I also found out today that in this country telling the truth can get you labeled a terrorist. Unbelievable!
@@marthavera8682 he was shot by one of the cia agents in the front seat find the unedited video that show all 3 row seats in view that’s why they flipped the pictures.
"Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." - JFK
Judith Campbell Exner, who served as a conduit between JFK and mobster Sam Giancana, had an abortion after becoming pregnant with the President’s child, revealing details about their alleged affair in her 1977 memoir “My Story.” Jackie Kennedy is said to have been unsurprised by what the book revealed. The mafia moll Exner spoke again of her relationship with the president in a 1997 interview in which she revealed that she ended her two-year affair with Kennedy in early 1963. It is around this time she claims that she aborted his child. Introduced to Kennedy via her ex Frank Sinatra, she ferried envelopes between the President and Sam Giancana, to whom she was also a mistress, including, she claims, alleged payoffs or instructions for vote-buying in elections and plans to kill Fidel Castro. “Jack never in a million years thought he was doing anything that would hurt me, but that’s the way he conducted himself; the Kennedys have their own set of rules,” she said.
This was such a good documentary and it’s so obvious that they covered up a bunch of stuff or try to cover up. These people need an amazing job, putting all the pieces together the real way and that part with his son is saluting at his funeral just gives you goosebumps all over RIP, JFK.
Old, I have been up and down on the conspiracies. No average folk were suspicious. Just shock. Untill Yeats layer and we read some pretty convincing books. My fiirst read was the one on RFK that explained JFK. Later I got bogged down in competingvtheiries and decided Oswald was a lone gunman. Now I'm 60 years layer wondering all over again.
It's an inside job by CIA ..if you watch assassination video.. the last shot in the head was fired by the driver itself..it looks even kennedy wife knows the plot
Born and raised in Dallas, it’s still so eerie every time I go down that street with the white Xs showing exactly when Kennedy was shot. I will always remember the stories my grandfather told me about that day as he was an Officer in Dallas at the time.
Oswald had been to the USSR, where he had declared he wanted to defect. The CIA and the FBI put surveillance on him, but they stopped a few months before the assassination. No way a man like that, in Cold War America, could be let off the hook this easily. Unless he was a pawn, of course
That the weirdest thing about the whole Oswald scenario.People were put in[prison for way less,people lost jobs and could never work again just by associating with the left in America.This guy goes to Russia to defect and f-all happens to him?
Right when Oswald defects 2 things happen that don't add up. 1. There was no file opened on him until almost a year later and 2. The files when released should have been from the SR Division of Inteligence,l and not CI. 3. Officially he wasn't debriefed upon leaving the USSR. Not believable. Just like none of the forensics or ballistics are believable.
Jackie knew it was an unsolved murder. She said in an interview she had to get her children out of the US in order to protect them, and she did. I have always wondered what else she knew but couldn't say.
The Manchester Interviews are sealed for another 40 some years. gee Oswald Acted Alone and yet all the files were sealed for 75 years and no one with a conscience would ever accept in a murder if it was there own father all the incredible unbelievable things one must swallow to spout that nonsense.
I was alive when this happened. I was just a child, but remember it well. It was very real for me because at seven I had seen him and was a mere 20 feet from him in an open top limo in a very slow moving motorcade through my neighborhood in New Orleans. For me it wasn’t just someone I’d seen on TV, but a real person I’d seen with my very eyes. Somehow it was different. I have NEVER believed the government narrative. To me the whole thing has always smelled. I don’t accept it and never will.
Oswald never fired a shot. Keep searching for the truth brother. I was 8. It changed my life. When I saw Heraldo show the assassination, I began to investigate by reading book after book, tape every T.V. Special, and met Robert Groden at a seminar in New Jersey. Listen to my song( cassette rehearsal tape of poor quality) that tells everyone what I feel. Let The Heavens Fall by GLORIONBLAK.
My (Finnish) mom was 5, she remembers it too, but concepts like president or America werent yet solid to her. She has a vivid memory of standing in the living room and all the adults are horrified, my great grandma crying silently, with her hand over her mouth, visibly disturbed. This tough and stoic lady, survivor of two wars, now crying, scared mom immensely! It was only several years later when she realized what had actually happened and how momentous it was. This was the boomer-generations 9/11, everyone remembers where they were and what they felt. And I vaguely remember there being a plot to take JFK down in New Orleans, but apparently all the stars didnt align and it got nixed. Im thinking the local patsy didnt fall in line or some other moving part got screwed. I cant tell you where I heard it from, mustve been one of these conspiracy films, but Ive watched every one Ive found.. But there might be a parallel universe, where you witnessed the presidents murder. Wild thought, uncomfortable thought.
I was 7 and still remember that day and the days after. It was the first time I had seen adults cry. The whole world turn silent. 911 reminded me of the that silence. I’ll never believe that Oswald did this alone. After the film came out, I was convinced. To think our own government had something to do with this is frightening. We certainly haven’t been the same since that day.
We can argue for 100 years about it. But there’s one fact that cannot be debated anymore. The headshot came from the front of the car and whoever did it got away. Not even debatable. Oswald can’t be in front of the car and behind the car at the same time
Sir, you are absolutely correct! I live in Dallas and I have researched this case for over 30 years. I'm an avid weapons buff, hunter, retired firefighter/paramedic and my own conclusions were developed on my own when I quit reading about the case and started doing my own investigation into shooter locations. I had long held that a fatal shot came from the grassy knoll and I was sort of heart broke when my investigation proved otherwise. What I did learn in my research, is the throat shot and the fatal head shot came from the winged out portion of the railroad bridge on the southeast side of elm. Two years after I made this conclusion, Sherry Feister, a Dallas forensic pathologist wrote a book concluding exactly where I had the shot coming from. I also concluded that the shooter was possibly and most likely named Jack Lawrence, a former Air Force sharpshooter and CIA contractor who had gotten a job at a car dealership blocks from Dealey plaza just weeks before the assassination. The throat shot was aimed at JFK's head between the rearview mirror and driver Greer but the windshield canted the round downward and struck him in the throat and exited his back above and to the right of the back entrance wound. The limo made its way down elm st and most people do not realize the hard curve in the road to the left and 6% downward slope. The limo being as long as it is, as it proceeded downslope, the nose of the car is lowered and the back of the car is higher thus giving a 6-8 inch clearance of JFK's head to the shooter above the windshield. JFK was looking slightly to his left and his head tilted slightly down. The round struck between his right eye and right temple almost in the hairline. There were people on the railroad bridge but I did a little experiment. I assumed a prone firing position at the winged out portion of the bridge as if I were firing between the concrete slats. My buddy stood in the middle of the bridge and could not see me at all. The concrete slats of the bridge provide quite a bit of concealment and It gives a clear field of fire with no chance of obstruction from anyone or any vehicle. I also determined that the shooter would also require a spotter and a rear security person with fake secret service credentials and a gun. The shooter would make his shots, hand the gun to the spotter who would break the gun down into two pieces and place it into a tool box. Both the spotter and shooter would be wearing railroad worker attire. The security guy would be standing away from the team but at a vantage point of watching the parking lot and the bridge. He would be wearing a suit as in being an authority figure or official capacity. Possibly with a jacket over an arm concealing a machine gun or weapon . A flash bang would be set off behind the picket fence at the famed grassy knoll. This would cause everyone's attention to be focused at this point and they would head that way in droves. Smoke from the flash bang would hang in the air underneath the trees. This diversion would allow railroad bridge shooters to walk to the parking lot just off the corner of the bridge and get into a car and drive away or walk over the railroad tracks down to the trinity river viaduct. This would explain why Jack Lawrence's pants were wet and muddy when he returned to the car dealership. His co workers asked him where he had been. He went straight the restroom and could be heard throwing up. He was questioned by the Dallas PD and he was back in California a few days later. One round did come from the top of the records building. It struck the manhole cement cover and it is still visible today. No way it came from the TSBD. This round dug a small trench in the ground and noticed by witnesses. An FBI agent Barrett retrieved the round and it was never seen or heard from again. I assume since this shooter missed by an absolute mile that he did not fire again but its purpose could have been a diversion. Not sure.
I’m one of the ones that believe it. I use to think it wasn’t him only. He was a loser and wanted to be famous and he got his wish. Oswald was actually enjoying it when caught. Case closed to me.
"I can’t believe there are people out there who still believe it was Oswald and Oswald alone." Perhaps the reason you can't believe it is simply because you've come nowhere close to studying the majority of the evidence? For example, how many of the 552 testimonies to the Warren Commission have you read all the way through from start to finish?
@@joedanache7970 If Oswald confessed he was as good as executed. If he denied all, he could hope to spin his sick fame out indefinitely, perhaps even beat the rap. He was not playing with a full deck.
I think the more terrifying fact is that they never revealed the classified information on this. What is in there that is so damaging and threatening that almost 80 years later it cannot be revealed.
All the classified into regarding the assassination has been released. Officials assigned to review and release them after 1992 have seen them all. Some names and methods are redacted for privacy.
Thompson has been a buffoon for years and all credible medical, forensic, eyewitness, film and ballistic evidence clearly demonstrates the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
Yeah, it was a set up... I'm watching this and Josiah Thompson is mostly right be he is off on a few things. JFK was not hit in the head from the right and the back. 4 hits 2 misses 1) JFK - Throat - Knoll 2) JFK - Lower back - Book Depository 3) Connally - Records Building (This could have been the Oswald stand-in in Mexico) 4) JFK - Head shot - Knoll The 2 misses could have been from Book Depository and Records Building... I'm pretty sure Roscoe White was the knoll shooter, pretty sure he shot Tippt and I'm 100% sure he was the Oswald back yard stand in... That's all I got..
I also find it odd that Trump has called for the truth in the JFK assassination in the past. He's a truth seeker and the government hates truth seekers
@@mobiusbelts3607 That's just more fiction from Oliver Stone, who made the movie that's a brilliant presentation of total nonsense. I've seen him interviewed about this new movie and there's nothing there. Just more speculation.
You know, the real shame was, they paraded Oswald around in front of the cameras before a full investigation had been carried out. This enraged the country against him and led Ruby to shoot him. Too bad! If he had gotten full due process, imagine how much we would have learned, whether he was the lone shooter or not.
Lee did not shoot a rifle or a pistol that day at all and even gen walker, he did not do that, after all the bullet that went through the glass at gen walkers home was never found and they say it was lee h Oswald how when you have no evidence, just because marina said that gen walker could be the next hitler, based on lee's political views is how they came to that arrangement, all set up to make lee look guilty full stop?
I think that's the crucial point when ppl talk of conspiracy. Seeing him killed on live TV was just so weird. I think its just Oswald. Computer crime scene recreation tech basically proved the single bullet theory....esp after the realization the front seat was higher than the back seat.
I am convinced that rage did not lead Ruby to kill Oswald. I believe Ruby was the means by which those who masterminded JFK's assassination shut up Oswald for good. Ruby was the ideal assassin; all knew he was dying of cancer. All quite neat. Now, who were the masterminds? Organized crime figures? Vietnamese incensed at the CIA assassinations of two of their leaders? Soviet spies? Castro? Libya? North Korea? Any other weird conspiracies you wish to name? We may never know.
Yup and never ever be the same. Never get to see a President up close and personal like that again. Never see an adoring crowd that was still innocent in ,knowing without doubt we were the greatest country in the world filled with hope and optimism, before all the Political Assassinations . Before The Warren Report,LBJ,Vietnam,Nixon,The Bushes and Bubba Clinton,The Donald, Endless Scandal and corruption.
No, you need to watch JFK to 911 a rich man's trick, now that's the truth and it's one of the best documentaries I have ever watched regarding what happened to Kennedy and 911 through the Nazi Bush family
If he talks about a second gunman, only, then he’s not telling the whole story. It was more than two gunman. There was closer to six to make sure that it happened.
@@skinsbigfanhttr1249 Yep! The documentary JFK to 911 a rich man's trick shows 6 or 7 gunmen the one that took Kennedys head off was in the sewer drain..
We couldn't find and make an arrest confidently that fast today with all our advancements in technology and investigatory techniques. Just even the fact Allen Dulles ex CIA director whom Kennedy fired is on the commission investigating his assassination is disgusting...!!!
Oswald was arrested when he was because when shoe store clerk Johnny Brewer, who had just heard the APB and description out for the man seen in the TSBD window and missing TSBD Oswald, saw Oswald trying to hide in his storefront and duck into the theater as cop cars came screaming into the area in response to Tippit's death. When he called the tip in it was realized the theater ducker was a good match for the Tippit suspect. Right on cue, Oswald tried to shoot the first cop to approach him inside. There is nothing sinister about his capture.
Yeah, it was a set up... I'm watching this and Josiah Thompson is mostly right be he is off on a few things. JFK was not hit in the head from the right and the back. 4 hits 2 misses 1) JFK - Throat - Knoll 2) JFK - Lower back - Book Depository 3) Connally - Records Building (This could have been the Oswald stand-in in Mexico) 4) JFK - Head shot - Knoll The 2 misses could have been from Book Depository and Records Building... I'm pretty sure Roscoe White was the knoll shooter, pretty sure he shot Tippt and I'm 100% sure he was the Oswald back yard stand in... That's all I got.. lol...
@@swankybutters8371 "I'm pretty sure...." lol You're also on record that the doctors who spoke freely about the assassination ever since it happened, often to conspiracy authors, didn't want to get "rubbed out" and have had no problem whatsoever accusing J.D. Tippit, a decorated police officer who gave his life in the cause of his duty, of being an murderer himself, with absolutely zero evidence, and bravely not giving one hoot how much your despicable and irresponsible words might hurt his family....
@@aaronz7056 Yes, pretty sure is what you say when you can't be 100% and it's hard to be 100% on everything.. Roscoe being the Oswald stand in, that one I'm 100% sure.
Since they mentioned the “umbrella man”I thought they would of mentioned the “babushka lady.” A lady that was apparently caught on tape filming the assassination from a crucial position but just standing there filming, not flinching or reacting to the gunfire and what she would have witnessed at the time. But the identification of this lady is of course unknown. There are way too many questions for this not to be a cover up.
@@BetweenStations77 you are talking about Beverly Oliver? She is a scam artist who claims she is thenB.Lady, but there is no way. She is full of lies & out to,profit off of that day…sadly. To this day, there has never been a confirmation of BL’s identity.
@@vernpascal1531, while I respect your statement, I have to disagree. Anyone that uses such a horrible event to benefit themselves are the lowest of the lows in my book. She has lied to anyone that would listen for over 50 yrs about being the B.L. MAYBE, she was there that day, but no way is she who she claims. Wonder just how much money she has taken in off of her outlandish lies. She SHOULD have charges against her….her & James Files….another one who uses JFK’s murder to line his pockets. Again, no disrespect to you for your opinion, just distain to those who prey on the innocent.
After looking at the evidence in this National tragedy, I have arrived at a few conclusions. There was a group operating outside of the social contract (constitution). Not only were they operating, but they are also still in charge (No records release).
No doubt. But if a lawyer could have gotten to him, maybe at least we would hear his voice better today (whether he was assassin, patsy or total innocent).
The documentary is full of misinformation. Example: the rifle found was not the Italian 6.5 manlicker that Oswald owned. The rifle found, was a 7.65 German mouser. That was the rifle 5hat was in the warren commissions original report. After learning that Oswald only owned an Italian rifle, they changed the finding to match Oswald rifle .
@@CraigOpperman-e5z no, the name Mauser was never seen, and certainly not reported in the Warren Report, and the error was corrected that same day. The found the order letter and Oswald's palm print on the rifle and his shirt fibers on the rifle that same day. The bullets that killed JFK were matched to the Italian Carcano found that day to the exclusion of any other guns in the world.
@@CraigOpperman-e5z Rubbish, cops freely owned up to misidentifying the unfamiliar rifle at first, big freaking' deal, but of course, for paranoid crackpots, the idea a few police might have made a mistake is too incredible to consider, it's much more likely that somebody left the wrong kind of rifle lying around the crime scene for an army of searchers to find, certain that every cop to enter the building could be safely relied on to bend over backwards making himself an accessory to murder and treason...
Dang that’s crazy to think that as soon as her husbands head was shot, she quickly thought to grab all the pieces. Like I would never think to do that I’d just be sitting there yelling or something.
In addition to being First Lady, Jacqueline Kennedy was a Mother to two young children. Mother's are always picking up things that children drop. I believe her reactions were voluntary due to her role of being a Mother.
@@Mountain_Sage that's a bit of a stretch but possible I guess I would think it would be morebout of shock and maybe a humpty dumpty situation not to be cruel
@@MikeY-nh2we Dr. Pepper Jenkins stated that Jackie Kennedy walked into Trauma Room #1, with her hands cupped as if holding a baby bird. She handed him JFK's hair tissue and stated, "This might help." She had launched herself onto the trunk of the limousine within three seconds of the bullet striking JFK's head. In my previous post, I wish to correct her actions as "involuntary reactions" versus a voluntary reaction. Perhaps those who've picked up a child's pass-a-fire numerous times can weigh-in as to whether they even think about the action of retrieving the pass-a-fire. The visual image from the Zapruder Film and Dr. Jenkins statement attest to the fact that Mrs. Kennedy retrieved the human tissue. Her motives are uncertain, unless she has ever stated otherwise. She was not interviewed by either the FBI or the Warren Commission. This appears to be a glaring example an incomplete investigation at best, or a rigged investigation at it's worst. Your call.
@@Mountain_Sage that's what I mean when I said her actions were in relation to humpty dumpty she was sadly just trying to put all the pieces back together, I have raised 3 boys and have picked up plenty of pacifiers, bottles you name it but when witnessing you're loved ones head exploding I wouldn't be instantly picking up the pieces because of years of child rearing but in Hope's of saving my loved one
They drove him right into a snipers triangle. Either way,he was never making it to his next appearance. Sad but true. So many angles he could of been hit from that day.
He could have made it out, if the limo hadn't slowed down and stopped! They had been trying to assassinate De Gaulle and learned this little lesson because De Gaulle's driver would never slow down! He was shot at many more times than JFK, so the driver HAD to be in on it!
@@dougstyles You mean CE399, which is badly crushed at the nose? If that was a planted bullet, no doubt you can explain how the guy planting it knew, all in advance: (A) Connally had been shot at all (B) the bullet wasn't still in his body (C) how to get in and out of the emergency ward without being seen (D) where exactly to plant it so it will be plausibly tied to Connally (E) that the bullet isn't missing too much or too little lead (F) that he's not planting one bullet too many into evidence and simply blowing the whole plot (G) that the "real shooters" haven't been caught and are singing like canaries (H) since the bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle, how he either got his hands on a bullet fired from that rifle or how he got to the ballistics boys on the Dallas P.D. and persuaded them to risk their necks for no gain whatsoever, obey illegal orders to falsify evidence, make themselves accessories to murder and treason and all trust each other implicitly never to crack, confess or finger each other for at least the next 58 years.
@@aaronz7056 Surely nobody knows how it got there. I have absolutely no clue. But whoever did,was probably eliminated within the next few hours. More questions than answers. Typical government mind games. Obviously we'll never %100 know what happened that day,and exactly who did what. Unfortunately we're just expected to move on with life.
It's incredible we've been told the head shot came from behind but Jackie clearly had said on camera that she climbed onto the back of the car to grab the piece of his head that had been blown off. Physics tells us all what that means.
the physics tells us that the piece came out as his head moved backward, or pieces were blown off in all directions, but the bullet initially moved JFK's head and most brain tissue and bone forward.
@@aaronz7056 indeed. That was to be expected when the bullet from behind hit hard bone. The video shows the blood and tissue pushed up and forward by the bullet from behind. The first few frames of the Zapruder film when seen frame by frame clearly shows JFK's head initially moving forward.
@@eameece never mind how the JFK film never addresses the seating arrangement in the limo. The lowered jump seat, more inward in the vehicle. The face that the actual bullet is actually deformed and not pristine as the conspiracy says. Connally’s back wound was a jagged wound, not a pristine bullet hole. The bullet lost speed and just tumbled, creating damage.
Who benefited the most? Lyndon B. Johnson and his military contracts. Why? Vietnam of course. One of the main things that President Kennedy wanted to do was pull all US personnel out of Southeast Asia. What was the first thing LBJ did the Gulf of Tonkin.
During the Vietnam War, the six largest military-industrial manufacturers in the US made half a TRILLION dollars in pure profit by supplying the American military, according to the book “Kill Zone - A Sniper Looks At Dealey Plaza” by Craig Roberts. Half a trillion dollars certainly seems like sufficient motive to assassinate a president.
@@krisaaron5771 Yes there are several motives which lead us to a massive conspiracy of many different groups. RFK's hounding and war on the mob you are looking at an insane amount of money and potentiallyendless conspirators there. Maybe not even mobsters per se,but politicians and businessman are all tied in with the mob too. You go after The Mob you are going after all of them. Then you have the Oil Depletion Allowance that saved The Oilmen millions and millions of Dollars that The Big Texas Oilman had to have. and LBJ gave to them...then Vietnam.
Ladybird Johnson sat on the board of directors at Bell Helicopters. The whole thing was a criminal enterprise to this day and has seen no justice except for the decline of the U.S. right before our very eyes. The chips are falling where they will.
I think the multiple gunman theory is no longer theory. It’s fact. Blood splatter analysis is one of the most reliable aspects of modern forensic science and supports the multiple gunman, grassy knoll, explanation. Also, you can debate all day if Oswald could have made all those shots alone (he couldn’t). But you can’t debate the fact that a single gunman would have taken the much easier point blank and square to him shot as the car approached on Houston and closed prior to turning left on Elm. Go there yourself and judge for yourself. Nobody, and I mean absolutely nobody, waits for that shot on Elm unless it is part of a multiple shooter crossfire ambush.
One book claimed up to 20 shooters in Dealey Plaza and surrounds - teams that did not know about each other. To quote on of them "we were going for a head shot"
I can easily debate that. Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid. If he opened fire on the limo on Houston he would have had time for only one shot before it sped up and rocketed past him, and it would have been instantly obvious to the Secret Service agents in the rear car exactly where the assassin was firing from, making him a dead duck. He was still a trained Marine and would have known this. Oh, and the Connallys and the agents in the front seat of the limo were splattered with blood, negating the grassy knoll "explanation."
There are two very important factors that EVERYONE have not noticed until now. One Dealey plaza was the only part of the motorcade that was virtually cleared of onlookers when the shooting started. TWO there were two types of ammunition used both dum dum and steel jacketed. Most assassins don't change ammunition types in the middle of shooting at their targets.
The shooter acted alone ? wtf lol ! - one gunman ? lol ! This so called lone gun man that keeps being mentioned had to be in 3 places of each location within seconds apart ! There is a super hero from Marvel Comic Book series - Called the "FLASH" That must have been the guy doing all the shooting ! lol !
@@hollywoodjoe123 a) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds. b) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. c) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. d) Connally was seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to his right. e) Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. f) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo, from behind. g) Kennedy's massive exit wound seen exploding at the right temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. h) Connally's said the shots came from behind. i) Bullet recovered from the stretcher was also matched to Oswald's rifle. j) That bullet is in a condition exactly consistent with going through Kennedy's body without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. k) If that bullet is a planted fake it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot. l) Witnesses directly under the window firmly said the shots came from directly overhead. m) Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would have plainly seen any gunman there. n) Zapruder's secretary was yards from the fence and said there was nobody there. o) Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. p) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. q) It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while firing from multiple directions.
Still waiting on the whole story. This has stayed with me all my life and I want the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth. They changed our course of history. Nothing can be made right until the whole story is told from beginning to end all truth. What a tragic loss those kids had to grow up with. A bad stain on our country. It seems the plan is to wait until all who were alive at that time are gone.
@@brendawise4365 How exactly do "we all know it was an inside job?" 58 years later and not one shred of REAL evidence to point at any group or person other than LHO. Please enlighten us.
@@JBliehall look up Howard hunt. Wh Bush was given stock and standard oil for his part. Also Howard hunt son still lives Dallas and has written a book. Mr Hunt gave a deathbed confession. Do your own research
Also, why wouldn't Oswald shoot as they were coming up main? The turn onto elm wasn't planned so it wasn't known to the public so who had them make that turn and why?
Oswald knew that shooting then would give away his position. He was still a trained marine. Last Podcast on the Left did a great and in depth series on the assassination. I highly suggest it.
The shot coming up Houston not main was blocked by the front windshield and furthermore by the roof bar between the driver and passengers. Watch the video at 25:39 . The turn onto Elm was well known and even published in the Dallas paper the day before the assassination.
@@sarahmathers6833 yup, Oliver stone tries to make something out of this, but your reasoning shows why. He might not have had the nerve to shoot him head on in the face either. But I've always thought it was about not giving his position away. Plus because of the downslope toward the railroad overpass, the shot from the sniper's nest didn't have to be adjusted virtaually at all for Oswald's second and third shot. He didn't have that on the approach to the TSBD
Agreed, maybe not so much for "Back & to the Left' but I just can't get by the fact that so many government officials, FBI, CIA, etc... so called experts, over almost 60yrs, when speaking on the assassination insist that Oswald was a lone shooter and it's just that simple. Then we're supposed to buy into the their theory that Ruby was so despondent over his sympathy for the Kennedy family he had to kill Oswald. Not to mention the Dallas police let Ruby wonder around freely that weekend. So for arguements sake, let's say that's the whole story. Then why in the world have they been afraid to release everything ? Their own story and the fact they refuse to release the investigation, everything in it's entirety, doesn't hold water. I was born at night, but not last night.
Three shots from the rear, Oswald fired the first two and the third was a .223 frag round. That said the real truth will never be told, nor should it because sometimes the truth is far to painful and conspiracy's are much easier to swallow.
Back and to the left means the entry wound would have entered at the back and exited front right, forcing his head back and to the left as it exploded out of the right side. Ballistic experts back this up 100%. Line that shot up and it leads you to the SS car behind. Then the SS taking the car within minutes of arriving at the hospital and cleaning all the evidence that would have potentially helped them find the shooter, the fact the AR-15 disappeared, they tried their very best to get Jacks body out of the Autopsy room and the fact Hickey never came forward to speak about the accusations against him and you can see how this has been so intriguing all these years! They all knew what happened but couldn’t tell the truth so had to make all these wild decisions. Donahue nailed it simple as
@@Modelo118 Howard Donahue got 99% of it right. It's the last 1% which should never see the light of day. Because the job of the secret service is to protect the President of the United States, even after he's deceased. Which is what the secret service has been doing for almost sixty years.
The thing that cemented that there was more than one shooter was JFK's head moving backwards, and the timing of the shots. To reload and accurately fire a rifle in that succession like that is unfathomable. Especially the analysis of the debris fields at the end. What an excellent documentary
Direction a person's head goes is meaningless regarding what direction the bullet came from. Limo sped up abruptly at the same time. 3 shots over 8-9 seconds (as victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate) is child's play for a trained Marine. It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions. Autopsy shows the shots all came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Connally's said the shots came from behind. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody seated forward in the limo.
@@aaronz7056 Total nonsense as usual from your comments. Harper fragment was fount BACK not forward (I assume you got this evidence from CIA friend- Bugliosi), Mrs Kennedy picked up fragment at the back of car not forward, policemen were hit with debris at the back to the left not forward, Clint and Sam Kinney also witnessed blood matter at the back NOT forward - there is so much evidence that points to more than one shooter but your tunnel vision cannot see it.
“They have taken me in because I lived in the Soviet Union… I’m just a patsy”.. He connected his arrest to his defection, not a conspiracy?.. Pretty obvious what he’s doing there, trying to poison a potential jury pool.. This is exactly why it’s never a good idea to let a double murder suspect give a press conference.. lol..
I showed the Zapruder film to my Doctor (who said he had never seen it before) and he said even the throat shot would have been VERY questionable if he could have survived!!!
That's interesting because I recall some of the Parkland surgeons attending to Kennedy saying they felt the throat wound alone would have been highly survivable in that the bullet had not struck any major artery or organ (he was not bleeding profusely from that wound) nor did it hit his spinal cord or any bone..and he was at the hospital within several minutes...whether it would have affected his speech or overall health is up for debate probably. Anyway, I'm sure your doctor would amend his opinion if he knew those facts. But, the bullet traveled clean through, tearing only soft tissue and part of the larynx. In fact, the exit wound happened to be right were an incision was made (only had to enlarged slightly) to insert a breathing tube (laryngectomy or tracheostomy). The thing that sucks is that as JFK was clearly aware that he had been shot through the throat (grabbing his neck, Jackie even reported that he exclaimed "Ive been shot!!!"), he could have ducked down in his seat or to the floor of the car to avoid the fatal shot that was to come, if he were not wearing a large back brace that made this impossible!!! I suppose he was so surprised or in mild shock, but he was a WW2 veteran who saw action and was certainly no stranger to being under fire or the imminent threat of it in the Pacific Islands. Even with the brace one would think he could have leaned himself over, covering his wife of course, or rolled to the floor. It would not have looked very dignified, but it might have saved that poor man.
his airway was obstructed and he could not be intubated, so a tracheostomy was done. He would have been without oxygen 6-7 minute to get to Parkland. Normally you would just intubate him through the trachea
Own dogs bit him, mos def. He wanted to break CIA, reign in the rogues and paid for it. When Clinton asked for the ufo-files, his staffer (Podesta) was basically told he better quit pushing it or he might end up same way as JFK. I take it as confession.
@@aaronz7056 Ironclad hu? Everything that you belive is backed up with Ironclad evidence? If you are actually interested in knowing, then I would recommend the documentry NUMEC: How Israel Stole the Atomic Bomb, and/or War by Deception both by Ryan Dawson . The Short answer: JFK was trying to prevent Israel from becoming a nuclear power and he also wanted to disband secret societies.
This was a great documentary. Even if you believe Oswald was the lone assassin this clearly makes a solid case for for conspiracy. There is one point nobody has raised which has often made me wonder. Why was Oswald the only employee that left the Texas Book Depository after the assassination? And why did he sneak into a movie theater? If he was just a patsy and not involved, why would he want the police to raise further suspicions about him by leaving mid day? There are a lot of questions we will never have the answer for. What bothers me the most are those who declare case closed and Oswald was the lone gunman. I don't think anyone can definitively conclude that.
Oswald was not the only one who left after the Assassination as it was a chaotic Zoo. Even though as anyone who reads my posts know that I'm 1000% conspiracy, that Oswald's actions are not indicative of an entirely innocent person. You don't hang around JFK Haters and main suspects Ferrie, DeM,Phillips, Banister, Shaw, Thornley etc and be squeaky clean. If he was innocent he would have made sure he couldn't have been framed by standing on the steps out front and telling several co-workers.
Oswald was the only TSBD employee *inside* the building who immediately fled the building after the assassination, thus the only one to leave who would not have had an alibi by being out in plain sight during the shooting.
But 90 seconds after the last shot? So calm and under control? No sign of stress? Not out if breath despite descending several flights of stairs in seconds? Able to engage with law enforcement after committing the biggest crime in the US that century? No expert - I am just a nurse - but I find that highly unlikely.
@@garethfieldstead7547 Able to engage? He stood there blank-faced. 90 seconds is sufficient time for a young man in good shape to make it down those stairs, he wouldn't have to be out of breath.
@@aaronz7056 yet was visibly distressed when advised by the press he was about to be charged for the assassination. Haven't read anywhere that he was temporarily mute when confronted by the police in the TSBD. The guy must have had nerves of steel - or he was just a patsy. I believe the latter.
Shoot a melon or any sphere filled with fluid with a high powered rifle round and there will be a small hole where the bullet enters and a much larger hole where the bullet exits accompanied by exploding gas and fluid. Simple physics. You can also observe this phenomenon when a window is struck by a BB. There will be a tiny 1/8" hole where the pellet hits the glass and a cone-shaped hole expanding from 3/4" to 1"" on the other side. Not the other way around, sorry.
I've seen about a dozen documentaries on this since Stone's film came out. This is easily the best one I've ever seen. The arguments are well backed up and researched with plenty of supporting evidence. Johnson's phone call recording was stunning yet logical: perhaps the reason for the cover up was to prevent WW3.
@@WinstonSmith24 I'll check it out. I watched the first minute of it and looks interesting. I recently saw Inside Job and that was absolutely mind-blowing: also about the greed and unchecked power of the banking industry.
Yes I agree, the phone call is stunning. And there's no doubt that a no-conspiracy conclusion was more convenient for the Gov't than a Russian or Cuban conspiracy, but that does not mean there was such a conspiracy. The physical evidence genuinely supports a single-shooter scenario involving Oswald's rifle and the 6th floor window of the Book Depository. The autopsy clearly establishes an entrance wound in the rear of the head and a massive exit wound on the upper-right side. The exit impact and wound are clearly visible on the Zapruder film. Moreover, Oswald is THE LAST person anyone would recruit into a high-level conspiracy. The man didn't drive or have access to his own car. Nothing wrong with that - i don't have one either - but we're not talking James Bond material here.
Thank u for this. It's disappointing I can never find conspiracy documentaries on yt about this or really anything anymore. It's a loss that they erased all Jessie Ventura conspiracy theory shows from yt and just about everywhere. I really enjoyed that show. Anyways thank you for uploading this. Much appreciated.
There’s a bunch of them you just have to keep scrolling down when you search for it keep scrolling and scrolling down get passed all the mainstream BS and you’ll find a bunch I have a ton of them in my library not sure if you can see mine but if you can go for it I got em under JFK got another one labelled conspiracy with all sorts of stuff in it
watch the docu from peter r de vries on jfk. It goes much deeper into detail than this but is partially in dutch. Peter was an investigating journalist who was killed last year.
The house committee most ridiculous conclusion is its possible Oswald and someonelse were shooting at jfk at the same time but weren't working together. Aka the two lone nuts theory. .
Glad to see RUclips providing an Encyclopedia Britanica link to tell us what really happened. So pleased that the tech nerds of silicon valley are so all knowing
His tears say it all at the end of documentary, when asked " but don't you wanna know WHO it was after all that investigating?" He'd want to but how many people have died who've come eerily close to the answer? And yes, i like many in this country who LOVED him are left asking the question: what might've been had he lived?
@aaronz7056. How old are you if I may ask? I ask, because anyone who believes that Lee H.Oswald is the " lone gunman" is really missing blatant efforts made by culpable elements/people so JFK'S ASSASSINATION forever remains a mystery. For me , since the age of 6 have been a firm believer that the truth is in plain sight. It is more important,if we are to know, to ask the correct questions. "...up and to the left." If anything L.H.O., was indeed who he said - a patsy. History, does repeat itself.
Great piece! Ya can’t really argue that bullets weren’t coming from different directions considering the splatter. It’s like once they caught Oswald they just stuck their head in the sand and went with that. Sad and infuriating at the same time. ☮️
I await the day a conspiracy theorist explains how a gang assumed they could make this look like the work of one assassin as they blazed away at the victim from multiple, almost opposite directions.
@@aaronz7056 Just read the reports of the full Medical Personnel at both Hospitals, and that will Enlighten you. Palamara JFK From Parkland To Bethesda. Very important book.
@@vernpascal1531 No doubt you can also enlighten me as to how a conspiracy could have known Oswald would show up at the Paine house Nov 21, or that he wouldn't simply stand out on the sidewalk to watch the parade, or that he would immediately flee the TSBD, or how they could guarantee not one of the scores of police searching the plaza ever found one bullet or fragment that was not matched directly to Oswald's rifle, etc.
@@vernpascal1531 I seem to remember someone at the Autopsy, stating that he was handed a small bag of bullet fragments, and was told to place them in the presidents head. They were different from the other bullets.
@@lew832 There is so much evidence of extra bullets and fragments it's not funny. It would take awhile to post it,but The Mortician Tom Robinson said about 10 fragments were taken from the head wound and placed into a bag and disappeared. I also talked to Officer Of The Day Dennis David at a JFK Conf. and he was adamant that he typed up a receipt for more than one bullet,but less than 2, in 4 fragments that also disappeared.
I was just six months old when this happened. My parents, grandparents and everyone who was older talked about this and the Warren Commission. They were patriotic people, that trusted the government after WW2 and the Depression. Eisenhower was another name they trusted well. After the JFK assassination they were less trusting of the government and were more cynical about the Federal government. The actions by the Warren Commission and other state leaders, did just as much damage to the relationship of the Citizen towards their government, which they thought represented them. Now everything is a conspiracy. All the motives of the government are called into question, depending on who is in power. Oswald and co-conspirators killed Kennedy, but the government killed all trust with the people. After Watergate and other scandals, especially when they start to spin the truth, every incident becomes a Dealey Plaza Maze of information. As to second shooters, it's a wonder that none of that "backup" have came forward with evidence, over 59 years. No one broke silence, No one confessed on their death bed. Patriotism and trust died at Dealey Plaza as well.
Nice speech, especially the part about why don’t more criminals just confess. Now what was exposed or confessed to? Business plot, coup in Iran and Guatemala, gulf of Tonkin, conspiracy to do mlk, watergate, mk ultra, Iran contra. You do the math.
@@ykst6685 Yeah even when someone who lies about where they were 11-22-63 and is hooked up with other major suspects confesses, and we can't believe him? Even if you take Hunt out of the equation there's a pretty good circumstantial case against those he named.
No one broke their silence because the top dogs killed them all! DUH! I was 8 yo when this happened and I didn't even believe it! When we watched Oswald murdered surrounded by 75 or more policemen, didn't have to be a brain surgeon to know he was a patsy! The government/deep state doesn't have enough brains to operate outside of what they have been doing for decades. That's why it is so easy to stop their fingerprints on events!
@@captainamerica6525 Another conspiracy factoid. Please link us to "much evidence." Moronic conspiracy websites with long unreferenced diatribes don't count.
Wow. This is it. Thank you! As I write this in 2022, nearly every Wikipedia article relating to the JFK assassination goes out of its way to adopt the Warren report conclusions. In each sentence that begins to address an inconsistency of scientific evidence and testimony, that same well is poisoned within the first three words, by language that casts doubt on things that haven't even been said yet. And I am so completely disgusted. Sixty years later, the video publicly available, the audio in hand since the late 70's, syncing perfectly to evidence the truth... That I have to dig and dig and dig to get past the firewall of obfuscation that is STILL built around these facts. The continuing effort to sell a lie that no majority of Americans has EVER believed. And here we stand: Whatever is at the heart of this conspiracy continues to be regarded by those who covered it up, and moreso their offices' successors, that government funds and manpower are - to this day - dedicated to erecting smokescreens to conceal it; Buying studies from frauds, to refute it. And the dead! So many dead. Journalists, witnesses, investigators, police officers. My god! Thanks for nothing, America. In the words of MLK: "I know I won't get there with ya'. I'm moving to Canada."
The lack of the whole truth gives way to conspiracy. The problem that has developed over the years since the assassination, is that the American people can't tell the difference between the two.
@@gpiano88 It isn't just conspiracy. it is conspiracy after conspiracy to deny the truth. Everywhere you look in the JFK Assassination it's conspiracy after conspiracy...
Is shocking to see the limousine slow to a near stop for the kill shot. This is been discussed in other JFK documentaries, but the first time I could see it so clearly for myself. 51:27
@@gking300so you telling me the driver choosing to stop the car in the middle of a ride in front of dozens of people, bystanders (some taking pictures, some filming) in front of a bunch of secret service, then he turns around shoots jfk in the head, turns back around and just drives like normal? and nobody in the car saw it? he could have done it under the bridge or literally at any other point but this makes literally zero sense at all. and since your comment has one like i think you liked your own comment. or found somebody who cant think for even three seconds, too.
I have seen a number of these documentaries on the president's assassination. However, none of them ever mention why it is the presidential car drove so slowly on Elm Street. In fact before the final shot the vehicle had almost stopped. Why would the driver do that, and not be speeding away from danger at that point ?
It is bizarre, but the thinking was different back then though and we have the gift of hindsight. From the Secret Service’s perspective alone, all but one assassination attempt on a president was on foot rather than in a car. That attempt was on FDR, killing Chicago mayor Cermack. The car was not moving at the time. Now, the drivers of the vehicles in JFK’s motorcade stated they thought it was firecrackers, not gunshots. SS agent Clint Hill has stated they did not sound like rifle shots to him and he was near the front of the depository building at the time of the shots.
The car slowed down to make the sharp 120-degree turn onto Elm from Houston. They didn't recognize the first shot. The heard the second shot. Greer slowed the car but did not stop it. He was looking around to see what happened. Then the third shot came. I don't know why he took too long to speed up and make evasive moves. The car in front might have had to speed up too. I presume JFK and his crew were not expecting trouble, and they wanted to be visible and enjoy the crowd. It was a political trip. People just got complacent and careless, including JFK. And people today let Jackie off the hook. That is understandable, but why didn't she pull her husband down into the seat like Nellie Connally did for her husband? Why people didn't react fast enough is a question, but it's hard to believe their behavior was deliberate.
By leaving the rifle where it was found, Oswald had to know he'd be identified as the owner, which leaves the age old question: if he did this, what was his plan? He was a known employee of the School Book Depository, knew they'd find that out, find the rifle.....and yet he just goes to a movie theatre and waits to be caught? If he's guilty, his behavior has never made sense.
He ducked into the theater to dodge the police pouring into the area after he panicked and shot Officer Tippit. Caught inside, he promptly tried to shoot the first cop to approach him.
He went to the movie theater to people in the movie theater can see if police would do to him any were else know one would have seen any thing and get away with it
I think the guy's hands were dark because he didn't put the gun in his trunk, he put it in his Engine bay, taking it from his engine bay, pretending to be fixing his car or checking it, then putting it back in his engine bay. No one checks the engine bay. Probably right at the grill is the best place, in front of the radiator if they had one. Easy. Not the dirtiest place but you can get dirty pretty fast working on a car, hiding something. Anyone come up with that theory? 🧠💡 Anyone ever tried testing for gun powder residue on the fence next to the tree? Anyone look for shells? Who was on that team? Was the parking lot metered? Paid? What is the parking lot for? What business?
Intriguing thought. Had never considered it. Makes sense with Officer Smith saw. And if the cars were checked, the engine compartment probably would not have been. Instead of running or being seen trying to leave the area, hide the rifle and present credentials.
Ed Hoffman a deaf mute was the only witness to the shooter. His story is detailed in Men Who Kill Kennedy and Beyond The Fence Line. He saw a man shoot from the knoll behind the fence further down than Josiah Thompson suggests in this fine Documentary and this man gave the rifle to someone dressed as a RR Worker..he immediately broke it down and placed in a large tool bag and walked leisurely toward the train on the tracks behind the Grassy Knoll and Parking lot. The other man who fired in a Business suit walked slowly behind the fence toward the Pergola Structure. Hoffman was warned by his Father that he wouldn't be believed. Even though he had high personal integrity. That's exactly what happened. As soon as Oswald was arrested dozens and dozens of witnesses who saw or heard something besides Lone Nut Oswald were ignored or worse.
Enjoyed reading your comment. Great point. I believe a kid and his dad found a bit shell casing in the 1990s right behind the fence. Exactly what James Files said he did. Bit the shell casing and left it as a token. A stupid move he later admitted.
I’m concerned that a secret service agent in charge of protecting the president and his wife would say he heard an explosion over his right shoulder and it didn’t sound like a gunshot, more like a firecracker. I would assume the detail was briefed prior to the parade that Dallas was not considered friendly territory for the Kennedy’s. Yet, his first thought of an explosion in that setting was a firecracker. I can tell you from experience of hearing a firecracker in an urban setting, that anyone who doesn’t think it sounds like a gunshot isn’t well trained on firearms and shouldn’t be on a protection detail. His first reaction should have been gunshot, not firecracker. The agent may have been a good man, and did react once he saw JFK hit, but I’m just surprised by the statement. But that’s just my opinion. And the assassination was coordinated by CIA, mafia and local players in Dallas. I think they truly believed JFK was a threat to the nation and they were doing the nation a service. As they did RFK and MLK. LBJ was an evil man. Who at least had knowledge of the assassination plan, and was the beneficiary as he hated the Kennedy’s. The fingerprint of Malcom Wallace was found at the crime scene. Wallace, known by many as the personal assassin for LBJ. Wallace was killed on Route 271 in Pittsburg Texas in January 1971 when his car veered off the road and struck a bridge abutment at age 50. No ice, no water on road noted by the patrolman. Many have been killed over the years to keep truth from being revealed. LBJ dies 1973. The man was responsible for much pain in the world. My guess is we will never know the entire truth and all the players involved. Even if we did, half the country wouldn’t believe it. You have to find truth for yourselves. Why are the JFK files still sealed after 50 plus years?
2 года назад
the secret service was in on the assassination of JFK and it probably wasnt the first time
There is a book called 11/22/63 about a man who goes back and tries to stop the assassination. It’s an interesting read, they also made a show about it.
@@brindlekintales I don't think they are that profitable. Imagine if the mainstream Media actually was interested in the truth? Instead of mindless debunking, which never goes anywhere, since it was a large high level conspiracy with multiple groups and many people involved in Different Cities and Countries.
@@brindlekintales Highly profitable?! That is incorrect. Most of the researchers use their own funds to perform their work. Do you think Vincent B and Posner profited from their work?
What a series of conveniences! An assassination of the most powerful man on the planet and the situation handled like a circus. Oswald was to much of a perfect scapegoat
Your scapegoat owned and smuggled the rifle, lied to police about his whereabouts, immediately fled the plaza, was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses shooting a cop and fleeing, was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop, refused to cooperate with any investigator, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
What we see at the end of the Zapruder Film is what we should have seen at the start of the Zapruder film - The Limo should have sped off at the first sound of firecrackers!!!!!!
Arron, The limo was a 1963 Lincoln convertible. It weighed > 4,000 pounds and had an abysmal small V-8 engine. He couldn't have sped up even if he reacted to the first shot that everyone, including the PD motorcycle detail, thought was a backfire. The time from the second to 3rd and fatal shot was
All credible ballistic, film, forensic, eyewitness and medical evidence demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
John Kennedy - had so many powerful enemies - the mind boggles. The head of the US Mafia - Sam Giancana's girlfriend - the beautiful Judith Exner was having an affair with John Kennedy. No doubt Giancana was suitably impressed. John Kennedy's brother Robert as Attorney General , was also conducting an almost private war directed against the mafia leadership across the USA . The whole Cuban fraternity living in the US ' loved John Kennedy ' after he withdrew formal US support for the botched invasion of Cuba . Many hundreds of Cuban emigres were either killed or imprisoned by Castro forces as a result . The CIA 'loved ' him as well ,for his many threats aimed at dismantling that organization. His closest 'political ' colleagues also loved him - not least Lyndon B. Johnson. With so many powerful enemies - it was only a matter of time before he was KILLED
i don’t care what they say the bullet that blew his face came from another direction , you can see that his brain matter is blown towards his back so he was shot from the front!!
Dealey Plaza was a shooting gallery on November 22, 1963. I am one of those who don't believe Oswald shot any gun that never mind the gun(s) that killed JFK.
The one ☝🏾 thing I’ve always felt even as a child coming from a family of 6 siblings. Is what a horrific traumatic horrible way for one ☝🏾 of my siblings to die. And to have it replayed so publicly over and over again how traumatizing it must be for the Kennedy family. RIP JFK Bobby Jackie Ted Ann 🙏🏼
The Kennedys, for many years, had a part in concealing Z-Film Frames, 312, 313, 314. But why? Was it because left-handed Jackie shot Jack? Both shots had to likely come from within the vehicle. Clint Hill was Jackie's personal body guard. He took the evidence of gun smoked pink hat, and white gloves, and likely the small gun, and shell. Ask him, why?
Thanks to ABC and all the experts that invested their time to find out the truth, now we all can know a lot more of what was going on ... It was just beyond tragic.
JACK LAWRENCE - storm drain shooter. Frame 313 Zapruder film. 6 feet above JFK the bullet exiting, STRAIGHT UP n forward. (part of CIA/MOSSAD organised this) Permindex/Louis Bloomfield).
@@thenotorious0606 How about you read Jim Bishop, or Norman Mailer, or Gerald Posner, or Dale Meyers, or those covering the case at the time, or the investigators who investigated it, instead of crackpot and uncorroborated paranoia?
He was shot from the front right anybody and everybody with basic understanding and logic of physics of impact from a bullet knows the fact of truth......
No bullets or fragments were ever found that were not matched to Oswald's gun. JFK had one entrance wound on the back of the skull, and a resulting massive exit wound exploding outward at the right temple, an impossible shot from the knoll but a clear and direct one from Oswald's window. JFK's head goes forward slightly at the instant of impact (as per scientific standard) and the direction a person's head goes after that is meaningless regarding what direction a bullet came from. Inner neurological reactions to the massive damage, JFK's back brace, the movement of the limo and Jackie tugging on him explain the rest. Negating all this would mean some conspiracy knew it could safely approach and successfully recruit all of the police who searched the plaza, the ballistics boys on the department, the pathologists, X-ray technicians and military personnel at Bethesda (where Jackie herself asked at the last minute her husband's body be taken) and persuade them risk their necks, obey illegal orders, and make themselves accessories to murder and treason (instead of taking the safer and simpler route of just saying Oswald must have had an accomplice who got away... which they didn't).
@@Gos1234567 I repeat, the direction a person's head goes on being shot is meaningless regarding the direction the bullet came from. It's not like being punched by a fist, you know. I note you didn't address or explain away one single point I made.
@@Gos1234567 Common enough, plus the points I just made above and all the other credible evidence against Oswald paints a pretty damning picture on old Lee...
By far the most comprehensive documentary with interviews of the MANY witnesses is the 9 hour series (The Men Who Killed Kennedy) which is still available on RUclips. The emergency room docs who tried to save JFK are interviewed and fully describe the head wound they saw. Men who actually saw the two shooters at the Grassy Knoll and the actual gun they used are interviewed. The German Mauser originally found in the Book Depository, before the Carcano emerged, is also shown. Texas Gov Connelly appears and clearly explains that the shot that hit him was NOT the shot that hit JFK. HUH? More than three shots? Conspiracy! Of course, if you believe in magic bullets, this all means nothing to you!
The Men Who Killed Kennedy is hilarious: the creators of that obviously bought any conspiracy theory they were told as gospel. (My favourite is Gordon Arnold.)
@@aaronz7056 the fact is there was a conspiracy. It's the specifics that are debatable. Fact is, based on photographic evidence, ballistic evidence, forensic evidence, and eyewitness testimony, more than 3 shots were fired and there was more than 1 assassin. The exact number of shots and assassins will realistically never be known.
@@JFKJustTheFacts Relax, there was no conspiracy. All that would have been needed then was one marksman who could peel off a disguise and disappear, leaving the authorities with an unsolved mystery on their hands. "Photographic evidence..." Could you be a little more vague, please? "Ballistics evidence..." The only bullets, shells or fragments ever found in the plaza, limo or victims came from Oswald's rifle, exclusively. The single bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with one that has gone through one body, then slowed and tumbled as it went through a second. "Forensics evidence..." Okay: the wounds on JFK and Connally line up perfectly regarding Connally's position when the bullet hit them both. Multiple computer analysis tests demonstrate the wounds also line up on a perfect trajectory to Oswald's window. JFK had one cratered entrance wound on the back of his skull and the bullet exploded outward at his right temple. No other wounds, no other shooters. "Eyewitness testimony..." Again, that's so vague what do you ever refer to? Of course, there's nothing on earth more shaky and unreliable than eyewitness testimony, but for the record, virtually every newsman in the motorcade or within earshot of the plaza firmly heard three shots. Guys on the lower floor of the TSBD firmly heard three shots fired from overhead. All evidence points to shot # 1 deflected by the tree branch and exploding in a spray of dust behind the car, #2 drilling both victims and #3 hitting JFK in the head. I still await the day a conspiracy theorist persuasively explains how a conspiracy could ever have predicted in a million years how they could immediately make this look like the work of just one shooter as they blazed away at JFK from multiple, almost opposite directions.
Your "patsy" shot a cop, was caught trying to shoot a second cop, fought like a complete maniac, lied to police, refused to cooperate with investigators, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, made no attempt to blow any conspiracy to anybody, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@margaretreid5655 There is a lot of evidence suggesting this. By amazing coincidence (sarcasm) Vallee in Chicago seemed to be also being set up for patsy status (although much more research would be needed to prove this).
@@margaretreid5655 Your "fall guy" owned and smuggled the rifle, lied to police about his whereabouts, immediately fled the crime scene, shot a cop, was caught trying to shoot a second cop, refused to cooperate, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@JfK--OBJECTivE And how, exactly did the sinister men setting up this patsy know: - he would show up unexpectedly at the Paine house Nov. 21, otherwise they can't pretend he smuggled the rifle Nov. 22 - he would lie to police about his whereabouts during the shooting - nobody would ever find any bullets or fragments that don't match to his gun - he would immediately flee the plaza after the shooting - Officer Tippit wouldn't simply outdraw and capture his attacker, blowing the whole plot then and there - Oswald would agree to help frame himself getting caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop - the Dallas PD was guaranteed to be on board for the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children - Oswald would refuse to cooperate and never blow any conspiracy to anybody - they could safely approach scores of witnesses, police, FBI, Secret Service, ballistics experts, military personnel, pathologists, whole commissions, Oswald family members, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason?
We note that the first and second shots were too close together as does the fourth and fifth shots to be from one shooter with a bolt action rifle. Thus there were st least two shooters.
This is so obvious that it is completely ignored. One of the largest open secrets in history. Everyone who looks at the evidence can tell within a few minutes that there was more than one shooter. Single bullet theory is incredibly the whole key to the warren report.
@@jackzaccardi1896 We note that there is evidence of small caliber bullets. Why? They are easier to muffle with a silencer. One could be a common .243 to the skull, the perfect flat shooting Police/Military sniper rifle round. Dr, James Humes head of the autopsy team measured a 6. 0 mm hole to skull. A 6.0 mm is a .243! Hummmm
why is the interview of james files removed from youtube? He told in detail where he stood at grassy knoll, and even said he used to make a bite mark on the casing. a casing were found at the grassy knoll, and there were also a bitemark on it. James files said it was his signature to make a bitemark on the casing after a hit.
There is no way one gunman can shoot then rack another round, aim and shoot that quickly for the final 2 shots when they dubbed the gunshot sound over the film.
@Dope Cat no they weren't ..in the 60s top marksmen tried it...fir a documentary only 1 pulled it off on his third attempt and he was one of the best shooters at the time...the rest failed
@Dope Cat a us Corp top marksman with double digits kills like nearly 100 tried it and said that it was impossible look at the comments section of the recreation from the old documentary there's 🇺🇸 snipers on there openly commenting that it was almost impossible....to replicate it in a controlled environment with multiple attempts is one thing to do that with adrenaline pumping and in real time is almost impossible ....if he did pull it off then he's the greatest marksman ever to live
Fantastic!! One of the best JFK documentary's I've ever seen. Josiah Thompson I believe is an American hero and a masterful investigator. I hope we finally get to find out the truth this december. I highly doubt it because it could implicate wrongdoing by important people but at least we could at least know who was behind it and why. RIP JFK-the greatest president in american history.
Yup, don't listen to anyone who denies the main points, which he proves with logic and strong evidence. Headshot from knoll. Almost simultaneous rear headshot, that shows blood and brain spatter 2 different distinct directions.
We know who was behind it, Lee Oswald, all by his lonesome.... all, all, all by his lonesome. Anyone who tells you different hasn't read the truth, found the truth or read the life of Oswald. The conspiracy boys & girls? Fools & charlatans...
What happens in december? They gonna re open the case and reviel what happend with all ballistic and such? I long time thought it was work of the maffia with several shooters.
The Gvt documents from the time clearly show that JFK was willing to take the CMC all the way to nuclear war!! Thank God Khrushchev was not as insane as JFK, and backed down and removed the missiles from Cuba. Otherwise, there'd be no internet for you to make your comment.
This is one of the best documentaries that I've seen, and yes i agree with its findings, but there is the who and why to consider and that i fear we shall never now for if we did governments would fall . Those few seconds changed the world forever.
Three curious facts about the case have always intrigued me to stay interested in the assassination. First , Oswald was hired or had his job given to him 6 weeks prior to the event. Second , the route was changed only days prior to the event and contrary to what any secret service will tell you about securing the president. Third , why wouldn't Oswald be watching the event like everyone else? I strongly feel he knew he had been set up and desperately tried to run not even knowing where to run to.
Exactly he was part of the abort team he realized he was being set up when the CIA agent he was suppose to call never answered the call.He was a patsy realized that and tried to run.
Here's the biggest problem with the motorcade route. It had long been known that to hit someone in a moving vehicle you had to slow it down. It doesn't matter if you have the world's best sniper in an optimum firing position - if the target is moving at speed (anything beyond 20 mph) you've got major problems. And if that target is moving on each of the X, Y & Z axes relative to your position (as Kenned would have been from Oswald's alleged vantage point on the sixth floor) - good luck. Way, way back in WWII Britain's SOE department launched project "Anthropoid" - which was an attempt to assassinate the head of the Reich Security Main Office, Reinhard Heydrich. It was a risky operation with enormous potential for serious blowback most likely initiated because Heydrich was getting just a bit too close to uncovering his rival, Wilhem Canaris' ties to Britain. The assassins would be operating in occupied territory and therefore couldn't rely a great deal on the local resistance. When SOE looked at Heydrich's schedule they very quickly came to the conclusion that there was only one opportunity to get close enough to Heydrich to make a successful attempt on his life - a tight, hairpin bend in the 8th District of Prague where the car would have to slow to a crawl. Anywhere else and Heydrich was moving much too fast. But even at such a low speed the British believed a gun or a rifle stood very little chance and so they opted instead to use explosives which could be tossed into the car. The Czech assassins failed to kill Heydrich outright - but they wounded him sufficiently for an infection to take hold and he would die soon after in hospital. If a conspiracy existed to murder JFK whilst he drove through Dallas the planners would undoubtedly have thought a lot about the British attempt on Heydrich. Which means they'd have to find a place where they could slow Kennedy's motorcade to a speed where the assassins stood a very, very high chance of success. Remember, this plot MUST succeed. If Kennedy somehow survived the retaliation - led by his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, would be swift and brutal. The probability of success could be raised by increasing the number of assassins (something the British couldn't do in Prague as the risk of being blown in occupied territory was very high) - but regardless of how many fire teams were thrown at the problem they HAD TO slow that car down to a speed where JFK was vulnerable. Now - Google the Sixth Floor Museum's interactive map of the motorcade route from Dallas Love Field - through the City of Dallas - right up to the Trade Mart building where Kennedy was scheduled to hold a luncheon. There was only one location on that entire route where Kennedy's car was in a position where a shooter stood an excellent chance of making a kill shot - the RIDICLOUS turn from Houston onto Elm - (another hairpin!), just like in the Heydrich case. Everywhere else Kennedys car was on a straight track with only a handful of turns which could be taken at much higher speeds. The interesting thing is - such an extreme turn was completely unnecessary because Kennedy's route could have been moved one block north onto Elm (which ran parallel to Main Street) and it would be a clean run straight through to the Stemmons Freeway and north to the Trade Mart. Why was the route changed? According to the Secret Service it was so "more people could see Kennedy moving through the city". Whether that was true or not - by changing the route to include that slow hairpin bend they were putting the President in mortal danger. Who changed the route? No one knows. Who ordered the secret service detail away from his car? We don’t know, but we know it wasn’t Kennedy. How does this relate to the central question? Well, you're asking people to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald (who knew at the time of being hired that Kennedy was about to visit Dallas but had no way of knowing the route) just happened to find himself YARDS AWAY from the ONLY location on that TEN MILE route from Love Field to the Dallas Trade Mart where Kennedy would be in mortal danger because of the extreme slow speed needed to make the turn from Houston onto Elm. This makes Oswald either the luckiest assassin in modern history or precisely what he said he was - a "patsy" who was artfully moved into position to take the fall by the only people who had the power to put Kennedy's motorcade in that precise spot. We know Oswald allegedly missed the last man he allegedly tried to assassinate, a lieutenant colonel who got fired for accusing Kennedy of treason. Strange that Oswald allegedly got away with trying to assassinate a military CO. who hated Kennedy, then apparently assassinated the man he hated. We also know that he was under surveillance from the fbi and they were “looking” for him, similar to the 911 hijackers. We also know he had proven links to the CIA, again similar to at least 2 of the 911 hijackers. The CIA was following Oswalds movements in Mexico and creating their own versions of his movements. George de mornschield says he was instructed by the CIA to befirend the Oswalds stating that as an elderly rich member of the white russian community in Texas he would have zero reasons to befriend a broke young marxist like Lee, and then you have Ruth Paine the self proclaimed "quaker" who had deep ties to the CIA, who also befriended them. We also know that Jack Ruby had proven links to the CIA, in particular a senior agent in the MK Ultra program called West, who was the last person to see Ruby alone in his cell before he was declared insane. We also know Ruby didn’t appear to know what was going in immediately after he killed Oswald. We also know that a lot of people (at least a dozen or more) connected with the assassination were either murdered or died in very mysterious circumstances in the months and years after the killing. We also know that the 1978 senate select commission on assassinations found that he was probably killed by a conspiracy. An awful lot of coincidences for a lone gunman.
@@StoutProper You are so ill-informed you seem unaware the HSCA was all set to conclude Oswald acted alone until those acoustics experts came forward with their dictabelt recording, which was subsequently discovered to be erroneous and invalid as evidence. This was soundly debunked more than 40 years ago! You are lying about the route being changed, about deMohrenshildt, etc. The rest of your assertions are just crackpot paranoia.
I’ve been researching this case for 30 plus years. This perhaps the best explanation on this segment .although he didn’t say anything about the Zapruder film being altered. The presidents limo came to a near stop before the driver hit the gas again. Had he not stopped it may have saved the presidents life. I thought of the simplest way for the grassy knoll shooter to get away would be to jump into the trunk and no one would think to look in there. This came to me a couple years ago. Im glad to see that he came to that possibility as well. I would have liked to hear his take on the ‘’magic bullet’’. Great job.
Film was in custody, processed and copied way too fast to have been screwed with. What, exactly, was Plan B if other films turn up that contradict an altered Zapruder film and just confirm a conspiracy exists?
"No one would think" to seach the cars in the parking lot??? No bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle. Connally's said the shots all came from behind. Witnesses under the sixth floor window said the shots all came from overhead. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Anybody firing a rifle on the knoll would have been absurdly obvious. Nobody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@aaronz7056 no bullets or fragments were found that didn’t come from Oswald’s rifle? Well duh, they didn’t want any any evidence that would suggest another shooter. The limo at Parkland was washed out and any fragments that were there were taken by the SS. Connally never believed the “magic bullet theory.” Of course the people under the sight floor window woukd say that. The people over by the grassy knoll, and watching from the over pass hear shots and saw smoke come up in the area of the fence and trees. Who’s, the autopsy was totally covered up. Where do you get that the autopsy proved all the shots came from the rear? If so, tell me how the back of the presidents head was blown out? Don’t even say it wasn’t. 25 or more ppl saw the head wound and in any court that would be plenty of evidence. Obvious huh, well to a certain extent he was. As I said smoke was seen rising from the fence, I even have a picture where you can see it. There were men behind that area dressed as Dallas police. Then there were men flashing badges that showed the were SS which is impossible because only SS was on the limos. The purpose of these men was to keep anyone walking back there and seeing those with a gun. Your last sentence I don’t exactly understand about framing.
@@aaronz7056 the Z film was developed and viewed by SS, FBI and Mr Z. , maybe Sam Donaldson. Right after that LIFE magazine bought the film. They then put it a safe where it was never shown to the public until 1975 on Good Night America. By then there was PLENTY of time to alter it. I’ll give you an example. Did you know that the driver of the presidents limo braked and came to almost a complete stop? Look it up. Now watch the Z film and tell me where you see the limo stop. There were a number of people filming and taking pictures. Every film that was taken that day was accounted for and only a few were ever returned. Same goes with everbroll of film, picture that was taken. The people involved were never let anything get out that could prove conspiracies. They never thought there would be something like the Z film. Imagine today, there are hundreds of smart phones that would capture it. I hope you have an open mind to someone who’s studied this for 35 years. I’m far from an expert but I try to keep learning. The hardest part is to filter the dis information that the z Warren Report people want to push. Peace!
I have watched the film of the Assassination multiple times. It doesn't matter how you slice it, you can't deny or cover up the fact that Kennedy was shot in the front as well. The evidence up to this point was so stiff that the shots only came from the Depository building. I don't believe it. I believe multiple shots hit Kennedy and from different directions. It is plain as day and undeniable that the killing blow didn't come from behind but rather from the front and I could determine that without the other ignored evidence from eyewitnesses seeing gunsmoke and/or hearing gunshots from the grassy knoll. I dont know what kind of idiots, who ever cooked up the official reports, thought we the people are, but I have to agree that the truth needs to truly released. But then again Former President Trump, when he took office in 2016, declared he would release all those documents and files on the JFK Assassination that the government has kept underwraps all these decades but then suddenly...he retracts his declaration. That tells me right there that the evidence is so shocking and so heavy that not even Trump would allow those files to be released. It must be something too dangerous to be released that easily as it could open up a bigger can of worms than just the JFK Assassination alone.
In my younger days my friends and I had access to a drain in the gutter . This gutter was located where a busy street ended at a T . We would get bags of popcorn together with a straw and spray the cars at the stop with popcorn. Nobody ever looked in the gutter. Kennedy's head was facing down yet the shot blew the back of his skull onto the trunk of the limo. I know where that shot came from.
there's a upload on u tube where a man did his own research using back then a old computer to work out the damage done to jfk's skull and he worked out that the shot from the front right came from the storm drain on the right side of jfk, plus in 1963 the opening in the drain was so much larger than what others have tried to test that theory, so even with a pistol you could aim and shoot which is why the 2nd shot to jfk's right temple area was so different, most rifle sounds are the same meaning that are two sounds ,the bullet moving faster than the speed of sound,which is the crack you hear and then a bang, so maybe it was a shot from the drain, who knows till a real investigation is done with modern forensics' and testing everything for powder residue in various areas, we will never know really other than jfk was murdered by professional shooters / military snipers & NOT LEE H OSWALD at all?
Sandra Styles and Vickie Adams were on the staircase at 12:30 and 12:31 and saw nobody. Baker and Truly found Oswald on the 2nd floor at 12:31. This proves Oswald was innocent and was on the 2nd floor during the killing. Had Oswald been on the 6th floor he should have been pounding down that staircase and ran smack into those 2 girls.
Several shooters were involved. They all hoped to get away without detection. Oswald didn't so he was going to take the fall. But he knew WAY too much so he had to be taken out. So Ruby took care of it.
Let me help you all out here. If your youngest then 50 you are clueless on what really happen. Oswald couldn't hit a barn 10 feet away with a shot gun. Let's get that out of the way. Oswald was nothing but a fall guy. So much so Ruby was hired to kill Oswald. Ruby DID NOT die from cancer. He had a chemical induced heart attack in his cell. LBJ hated the Kennedys with a sick passion. Linden Johnson was at the head of all the murders. He even had little Robert Kennedy assassinated. Think hard on what I wrote here. Just fallow the war dollar and you will learn for yourself
I believe he was the fall guy and the other guy was hired to kill him, and No way did he die from cancer. It's all too convenient. I've always believed that JFK knew too much and they murdered him like his son.
I would probably settle on the one nut job theory if it wasn't for Ruby blatantly throwing his life away before Oswald got a chance to realize he was set up (he may have realized it when he was shot). I don't care how upset or patriotic you are, you don't go and shoot anyone in a police station in front of the entire world with no possible escape unless you are some sort of schizophrenic or you are under some severe threat (family member will be killed if you don't do it, etc.). Then there is Oswald's phone call which most people don't know about. If you're interested look up Oswald's last call.
Ruby was not playing with a full deck, he could have made any public statement he wanted or begged protection for family members (none of whom were ever threatened) at any time or during his public trial. For a guy under threat, Ruby made no attempt to get Oswald during the press conference, brought his pet dog along on Nov. 24, and spent his last minutes of freedom standing around in line in a Western Union office on a minor business errand at exactly the time Oswald was already supposed to have been transferred.
The "Oswald call" is a red herring that didn't happen. Ruby was indeed a mentally disturbed and impulsive person. He loved Kennedy and was proud for what he did.
Ruby was mobbed up and it has been an open secret that the government has worked with the Mob for decades! Ruby's sister states he uwas so upset about it, becuse Oswald had hung out at his club a few times, that he was ordered to do it. The evidence also points out that Ruby ws taken out of th jail and went to Israel to live out his days. A woman who knew Ruby well, saw a news report and Ruby was in it boarding a plane going to Israel and she had no reason to lie about it!
@@cactusqltr But that woman did lie. It is well known that Ruby died in prison. The story that Beverly Oliver made up about seeing Oswald at Ruby's club is a lie too. Oliver just wanted some attention.
@@eameece Look, I know people who lived there and children grew up teaching them what they saw with their own eyes, knowing Oswald didn’t do it! I was a child myself but knew when they gunned Oswald down like that, it was a typical cover up! People aren’t as stupid as these murders of presidents want us to be and why they continue to hide information! If Oswald was alone, release ALL the records! But they won’t! Murdering someone is easy. It’s the cover up that gives you away!
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy's exit wound clearly seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions and with different guns.
I was in Dealey Plaza in July of last year and saw Josiah talking to someone for an interview..could’ve been for this documentary..I also saw Bill Newman there talking to someone too..Mr. Newman still tells the same story till this day.
I have always believed the fatal shot came from the front, not the rear. I also found out today that in this country telling the truth can get you labeled a terrorist. Unbelievable!
Front right of him
Or straight ahead,gutter
@@marthavera8682 he was shot by one of the cia agents in the front seat find the unedited video that show all 3 row seats in view that’s why they flipped the pictures.
@@truckerjay8568 wym flipped the pictures
Would you please provide an example of a person "in this country telling the truth" and being "labeled a terrorist"?
"Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." - JFK
Judith Campbell Exner, who served as a conduit between JFK and mobster Sam Giancana, had an abortion after becoming pregnant with the President’s child, revealing details about their alleged affair in her 1977 memoir “My Story.” Jackie Kennedy is said to have been unsurprised by what the book revealed.
The mafia moll Exner spoke again of her relationship with the president in a 1997 interview in which she revealed that she ended her two-year affair with Kennedy in early 1963. It is around this time she claims that she aborted his child.
Introduced to Kennedy via her ex Frank Sinatra, she ferried envelopes between the President and Sam Giancana, to whom she was also a mistress, including, she claims, alleged payoffs or instructions for vote-buying in elections and plans to kill Fidel Castro.
“Jack never in a million years thought he was doing anything that would hurt me, but that’s the way he conducted himself; the Kennedys have their own set of rules,” she said.
The basis of the Irish Mafia..
He was talking about communism 🤷🏻♂️
@Grim_Azrael Is that a fact, or does the shrug suggest you're unsure?
Good quote. Maybe this kind of statement was the reason he was taken out?
This was such a good documentary and it’s so obvious that they covered up a bunch of stuff or try to cover up. These people need an amazing job, putting all the pieces together the real way and that part with his son is saluting at his funeral just gives you goosebumps all over RIP, JFK.
Old, I have been up and down on the conspiracies. No average folk were suspicious. Just shock. Untill Yeats layer and we read some pretty convincing books. My fiirst read was the one on RFK that explained JFK. Later I got bogged down in competingvtheiries and decided Oswald was a lone gunman. Now I'm 60 years layer wondering all over again.
Sorry for misspellings bad eyesight. Stubby fingers
I hear you , I suffer from the same problem, when it’s from the heart of all ok 👍
It's an inside job by CIA ..if you watch assassination video.. the last shot in the head was fired by the driver itself..it looks even kennedy wife knows the plot
1:16:00 Why hasn’t anyone ever asked Mrs Kennedy’s Agent
Ask Him who called Him off the car right here just before the event 🤷🏿♂️
Born and raised in Dallas, it’s still so eerie every time I go down that street with the white Xs showing exactly when Kennedy was shot. I will always remember the stories my grandfather told me about that day as he was an Officer in Dallas at the time.
The driver shot him
How do you come to that conclusion? @@gking300
@@gking300his wife shot em and she co produced Hit Em Up by Tupac (coincidence I think not!!) 😮
Have always found it disgusting people take pics smiling on the x
Bless your grandparents 🙏
Oswald had been to the USSR, where he had declared he wanted to defect. The CIA and the FBI put surveillance on him, but they stopped a few months before the assassination. No way a man like that, in Cold War America, could be let off the hook this easily. Unless he was a pawn, of course
That the weirdest thing about the whole Oswald scenario.People were put in[prison for way less,people lost jobs and could never work again just by associating with the left in America.This guy goes to Russia to defect and f-all happens to him?
☝️ this.
Right when Oswald defects 2 things happen that don't add up. 1. There was no file opened on him until almost a year later and 2. The files when released should have been from the SR Division of Inteligence,l and not CI. 3. Officially he wasn't debriefed upon leaving the USSR. Not believable. Just like none of the forensics or ballistics are believable.
He did famously say, "I'm just a patsy."
how and where did he learn to speak fluent russian?
Jackie knew it was an unsolved murder. She said in an interview she had to get her children out of the US in order to protect them, and she did. I have always wondered what else she knew but couldn't say.
The Manchester Interviews are sealed for another 40 some years. gee Oswald Acted Alone and yet all the files were sealed for 75 years and no one with a conscience would ever accept in a murder if it was there own father all the incredible unbelievable things one must swallow to spout that nonsense.
Video kinda looks like she did it
@@ElinWinblad Not funny at all.
Jackie was an incredible goddess and by far the sexiest, smartest, most charming 1st lady we ever had.
Maybe the 2nd shooter hid his gun in a camera or something similar
I have to say, this is one of the most detailed doco's relating to the JFK assassination. Very good work put into this.
The one Oliver Stone just released is very detailed too. Four-part doco.
@@ritchuk Yeah between the both there is absolutely nothing left of The Warren Report ,or official story.
@@ritchuk I saw him on Rogan recently, whats it on?
@@hoagiemacintosh781 showtime
Most accurate you mean ?
I was alive when this happened. I was just a child, but remember it well. It was very real for me because at seven I had seen him and was a mere 20 feet from him in an open top limo in a very slow moving motorcade through my neighborhood in New Orleans.
For me it wasn’t just someone I’d seen on TV, but a real person I’d seen with my very eyes. Somehow it was different.
I have NEVER believed the government narrative. To me the whole thing has always smelled. I don’t accept it and never will.
Oswald never fired a shot. Keep searching for the truth brother. I was 8. It changed my life. When I saw Heraldo show the assassination, I began to investigate by reading book after book, tape every T.V. Special, and met Robert Groden at a seminar in New Jersey. Listen to my song( cassette rehearsal tape of poor quality) that tells everyone what I feel. Let The Heavens Fall by GLORIONBLAK.
That’s insane! Did the New Orleans one ever get put to film?
My (Finnish) mom was 5, she remembers it too, but concepts like president or America werent yet solid to her. She has a vivid memory of standing in the living room and all the adults are horrified, my great grandma crying silently, with her hand over her mouth, visibly disturbed. This tough and stoic lady, survivor of two wars, now crying, scared mom immensely! It was only several years later when she realized what had actually happened and how momentous it was. This was the boomer-generations 9/11, everyone remembers where they were and what they felt.
And I vaguely remember there being a plot to take JFK down in New Orleans, but apparently all the stars didnt align and it got nixed. Im thinking the local patsy didnt fall in line or some other moving part got screwed. I cant tell you where I heard it from, mustve been one of these conspiracy films, but Ive watched every one Ive found.. But there might be a parallel universe, where you witnessed the presidents murder. Wild thought, uncomfortable thought.
I was 7 and still remember that day and the days after. It was the first time I had seen adults cry. The whole world turn silent. 911 reminded me of the that silence. I’ll never believe that Oswald did this alone. After the film came out, I was convinced. To think our own government had something to do with this is frightening. We certainly haven’t been the same since that day.
I remember there being 4 ppl in the assassination?!?? Anyone else?
A healthy society needs the truth..
Never said so true about what's going on today!
We can argue for 100 years about it. But there’s one fact that cannot be debated anymore. The headshot came from the front of the car and whoever did it got away. Not even debatable. Oswald can’t be in front of the car and behind the car at the same time
Sir, you are absolutely correct!
I live in Dallas and I have researched this case for over 30 years. I'm an avid weapons buff, hunter, retired firefighter/paramedic and my own conclusions were developed on my own when I quit reading about the case and started doing my own investigation into shooter locations.
I had long held that a fatal shot came from the grassy knoll and I was sort of heart broke when my investigation proved otherwise. What I did learn in my research, is the throat shot and the fatal head shot came from the winged out portion of the railroad bridge on the southeast side of elm. Two years after I made this conclusion, Sherry Feister, a Dallas forensic pathologist wrote a book concluding exactly where I had the shot coming from.
I also concluded that the shooter was possibly and most likely named Jack Lawrence, a former Air Force sharpshooter and CIA contractor who had gotten a job at a car dealership blocks from Dealey plaza just weeks before the assassination.
The throat shot was aimed at JFK's head between the rearview mirror and driver Greer but the windshield canted the round downward and struck him in the throat and exited his back above and to the right of the back entrance wound.
The limo made its way down elm st and most people do not realize the hard curve in the road to the left and 6% downward slope. The limo being as long as it is, as it proceeded downslope, the nose of the car is lowered and the back of the car is higher thus giving a 6-8 inch clearance of JFK's head to the shooter above the windshield. JFK was looking slightly to his left and his head tilted slightly down. The round struck between his right eye and right temple almost in the hairline.
There were people on the railroad bridge but I did a little experiment. I assumed a prone firing position at the winged out portion of the bridge as if I were firing between the concrete slats. My buddy stood in the middle of the bridge and could not see me at all. The concrete slats of the bridge provide quite a bit of concealment and It gives a clear field of fire with no chance of obstruction from anyone or any vehicle.
I also determined that the shooter would also require a spotter and a rear security person with fake secret service credentials and a gun. The shooter would make his shots, hand the gun to the spotter who would break the gun down into two pieces and place it into a tool box. Both the spotter and shooter would be wearing railroad worker attire. The security guy would be standing away from the team but at a vantage point of watching the parking lot and the bridge. He would be wearing a suit as in being an authority figure or official capacity. Possibly with a jacket over an arm concealing a machine gun or weapon .
A flash bang would be set off behind the picket fence at the famed grassy knoll. This would cause everyone's attention to be focused at this point and they would head that way in droves. Smoke from the flash bang would hang in the air underneath the trees. This diversion would allow railroad bridge shooters to walk to the parking lot just off the corner of the bridge and get into a car and drive away or
walk over the railroad tracks down to the trinity river viaduct. This would explain why Jack Lawrence's pants were wet and muddy when he returned to the car dealership. His co workers asked him where he had been. He went straight the restroom and could be heard throwing up. He was questioned by the Dallas PD and he was back in California a few days later.
One round did come from the top of the records building. It struck the manhole cement cover and it is still visible today. No way it came from the TSBD. This round dug a small trench in the ground and noticed by witnesses. An FBI agent Barrett retrieved the round and it was never seen or heard from again. I assume since this shooter missed by an absolute mile that he did not fire again but its purpose could have been a diversion. Not sure.
@@fiddlefolk - Trust the official report. They were right.
@@NeverGiddy Some folks cant handle the TRUTH it interrupts their warm fuzzies and they are COWARDS
@@mikeflower4091 - Some folks may be like that, but not all folks.
@@NeverGiddy ...RIght about what exactly ?
I can’t believe there are people out there who still believe it was Oswald and Oswald alone.
I’m one of the ones that believe it. I use to think it wasn’t him only. He was a loser and wanted to be famous and he got his wish. Oswald was actually enjoying it when caught. Case closed to me.
"I can’t believe there are people out there who still believe it was Oswald and Oswald alone."
Perhaps the reason you can't believe it is simply because you've come nowhere close to studying the majority of the evidence? For example, how many of the 552 testimonies to the Warren Commission have you read all the way through from start to finish?
Because it WAS him. Alone.
Why then did he deny killing J.F.K. if he just wanted to be famous? If his intention was to be famous he would have bragged or admit killing J.F.K.
@@joedanache7970 If Oswald confessed he was as good as executed. If he denied all, he could hope to spin his sick fame out indefinitely, perhaps even beat the rap. He was not playing with a full deck.
I think the more terrifying fact is that they never revealed the classified information on this. What is in there that is so damaging and threatening that almost 80 years later it cannot be revealed.
60
All the classified into regarding the assassination has been released. Officials assigned to review and release them after 1992 have seen them all. Some names and methods are redacted for privacy.
@@eameece- NO - it has not all been released!!
Some names and methods are redacted for privacy.@@tdpooh1972 that's all there is to that. Don't be superstitious.
The driver shot him
Thank you so much for getting us closer to the truth. I'll be 70, this month. I'm glad I lived long enough to see this documentary. Shared!!!
This documentary ISN'T PROOF. It's all OPINIONS. There are other documentaries that say the exact opposite.
Thompson has been a buffoon for years and all credible medical, forensic, eyewitness, film and ballistic evidence clearly demonstrates the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
So heartbreaking even so many years later, seeing them getting off the plane knowing he had just minutes to live
not one suspect arrested and none interrogated that I am aware of
@@2666loco No one held accountable for the Cover Up. Threatening and browbeating pro conspiracy witnesses is in the record time after time.
Yeah, it was a set up... I'm watching this and Josiah Thompson is mostly right be he is off on a few things.
JFK was not hit in the head from the right and the back.
4 hits 2 misses
1) JFK - Throat - Knoll
2) JFK - Lower back - Book Depository
3) Connally - Records Building (This could have been the Oswald stand-in in Mexico)
4) JFK - Head shot - Knoll
The 2 misses could have been from Book Depository and Records Building...
I'm pretty sure Roscoe White was the knoll shooter, pretty sure he shot Tippt and I'm 100% sure he was the Oswald back yard stand in...
That's all I got..
@@2666loco uh yeah, there was one, the guy who did it...his initials LHO
@@djf750 the brainwashing is strong with you
Whose here after Trump got shot in Pa?
I also find it odd that Trump has called for the truth in the JFK assassination in the past. He's a truth seeker and the government hates truth seekers
Yep😂
Fuck trump aim better republicans
Trumps meat is bigger than Kennedys
I'm still convinced oswald had nothing to do with it.
I have studied this case for 30 years and this is the best documentary on the assassination itself. Really well done.
No, Frontline did the best one.
What is your opinion on Reclaiming History by Vincent Bugliosi?
@@BetweenStations77 From what I know of his work, I think he's fine. I wouldn't depend on him as the only source though.
Have you seen the 4hr version of jfk revisited through the looking glass? 2hr version?
@@mobiusbelts3607 That's just more fiction from Oliver Stone, who made the movie that's a brilliant presentation of total nonsense. I've seen him interviewed about this new movie and there's nothing there. Just more speculation.
You know, the real shame was, they paraded Oswald around in front of the cameras before a full investigation had been carried out. This enraged the country against him and led Ruby to shoot him. Too bad! If he had gotten full due process, imagine how much we would have learned, whether he was the lone shooter or not.
He would have died in jail of suicide'...they (U.S. Military Complex) chose him as a perfect Commie sympathizer to perpetuate the red scare
@@bridgetthauert5518 He was in jail and questioned for 2 full days!!!
Lee did not shoot a rifle or a pistol that day at all and even gen walker, he did not do that, after all the bullet that went through the glass at gen walkers home was never found and they say it was lee h Oswald how when you have no evidence, just because marina said that gen walker could be the next hitler, based on lee's political views is how they came to that arrangement, all set up to make lee look guilty full stop?
I think that's the crucial point when ppl talk of conspiracy. Seeing him killed on live TV was just so weird.
I think its just Oswald. Computer crime scene recreation tech basically proved the single bullet theory....esp after the realization the front seat was higher than the back seat.
I am convinced that rage did not lead Ruby to kill Oswald. I believe Ruby was the means by which those who masterminded JFK's assassination shut up Oswald for good. Ruby was the ideal assassin; all knew he was dying of cancer. All quite neat. Now, who were the masterminds? Organized crime figures? Vietnamese incensed at the CIA assassinations of two of their leaders? Soviet spies? Castro? Libya? North Korea? Any other weird conspiracies you wish to name? We may never know.
So heartbreaking! Watching them so young and vital getting off the plane and knowing he only had minutes to live
Yup and never ever be the same. Never get to see a President up close and personal like that again. Never see an adoring crowd that was still innocent in ,knowing without doubt we were the greatest country in the world filled with hope and optimism, before all the Political Assassinations . Before The Warren Report,LBJ,Vietnam,Nixon,The Bushes and Bubba Clinton,The Donald, Endless Scandal and corruption.
Yaa
"young & vital".. he was very sick & had huge addiction problems..
He only would have had a few years to live..
@@STARFOXPERIENCE 😂😂😂
@@STARFOXPERIENCE
And you got yer PhD where?
I`ve been watching so many documentaries about JFK murder, but this is by far the best and most impressive one!!
No, you need to watch JFK to 911 a rich man's trick, now that's the truth and it's one of the best documentaries I have ever watched regarding what happened to Kennedy and 911 through the Nazi Bush family
It is this is awesome.
Mind blowing actually ..
If he talks about a second gunman, only, then he’s not telling the whole story. It was more than two gunman. There was closer to six to make sure that it happened.
@@skinsbigfanhttr1249 Yep! The documentary JFK to 911 a rich man's trick shows 6 or 7 gunmen the one that took Kennedys head off was in the sewer drain..
We couldn't find and make an arrest confidently that fast today with all our advancements in technology and investigatory techniques. Just even the fact Allen Dulles ex CIA director whom Kennedy fired is on the commission investigating his assassination is disgusting...!!!
Oswald was arrested when he was because when shoe store clerk Johnny Brewer, who had just heard the APB and description out for the man seen in the TSBD window and missing TSBD Oswald, saw Oswald trying to hide in his storefront and duck into the theater as cop cars came screaming into the area in response to Tippit's death. When he called the tip in it was realized the theater ducker was a good match for the Tippit suspect. Right on cue, Oswald tried to shoot the first cop to approach him inside. There is nothing sinister about his capture.
@David Russell I totally agree!
Yeah, it was a set up... I'm watching this and Josiah Thompson is mostly right be he is off on a few things.
JFK was not hit in the head from the right and the back.
4 hits 2 misses
1) JFK - Throat - Knoll
2) JFK - Lower back - Book Depository
3) Connally - Records Building (This could have been the Oswald stand-in in Mexico)
4) JFK - Head shot - Knoll
The 2 misses could have been from Book Depository and Records Building...
I'm pretty sure Roscoe White was the knoll shooter, pretty sure he shot Tippt and I'm 100% sure he was the Oswald back yard stand in...
That's all I got.. lol...
@@swankybutters8371 "I'm pretty sure...." lol
You're also on record that the doctors who spoke freely about the assassination ever since it happened, often to conspiracy authors, didn't want to get "rubbed out" and have had no problem whatsoever accusing J.D. Tippit, a decorated police officer who gave his life in the cause of his duty, of being an murderer himself, with absolutely zero evidence, and bravely not giving one hoot how much your despicable and irresponsible words might hurt his family....
@@aaronz7056 Yes, pretty sure is what you say when you can't be 100% and it's hard to be 100% on everything.. Roscoe being the Oswald stand in, that one I'm 100% sure.
Since they mentioned the “umbrella man”I thought they would of mentioned the “babushka lady.” A lady that was apparently caught on tape filming the assassination from a crucial position but just standing there filming, not flinching or reacting to the gunfire and what she would have witnessed at the time. But the identification of this lady is of course unknown. There are way too many questions for this not to be a cover up.
Her name is featured in the series 'The Men who killed Kennedy.' She did an interview back in 1988.
@@BetweenStations77 you are talking about Beverly Oliver? She is a scam artist who claims she is thenB.Lady, but there is no way. She is full of lies & out to,profit off of that day…sadly. To this day, there has never been a confirmation of BL’s identity.
@@allenjones2591 ahhh i see. thanks for the clarification. Seems a few 'witnesses" were scam artists.
@@allenjones2591 I wouldn't say that. it's easy to trash someone.
@@vernpascal1531, while I respect your statement, I have to disagree. Anyone that uses such a horrible event to benefit themselves are the lowest of the lows in my book. She has lied to anyone that would listen for over 50 yrs about being the B.L. MAYBE, she was there that day, but no way is she who she claims. Wonder just how much money she has taken in off of her outlandish lies. She SHOULD have charges against her….her & James Files….another one who uses JFK’s murder to line his pockets. Again, no disrespect to you for your opinion, just distain to those who prey on the innocent.
After looking at the evidence in this National tragedy, I have arrived at a few conclusions. There was a group operating outside of the social contract (constitution). Not only were they operating, but they are also still in charge (No records release).
Operation Texas.
No doubt. But if a lawyer could have gotten to him, maybe at least we would hear his voice better today (whether he was assassin, patsy or total innocent).
As E Howard Hunt described it. 'The Big Event!'
Amen Brother
In that case the whole US Govt is currently operating outside the "Social Contract"
What an incredible documentary, ties all the evidence together in a profound way. Best one on RUclips.
The documentary is full of misinformation. Example: the rifle found was not the Italian 6.5 manlicker that Oswald owned. The rifle found, was a 7.65 German mouser. That was the rifle 5hat was in the warren commissions original report. After learning that Oswald only owned an Italian rifle, they changed the finding to match Oswald rifle .
@@CraigOpperman-e5z no, the name Mauser was never seen, and certainly not reported in the Warren Report, and the error was corrected that same day. The found the order letter and Oswald's palm print on the rifle and his shirt fibers on the rifle that same day. The bullets that killed JFK were matched to the Italian Carcano found that day to the exclusion of any other guns in the world.
@@CraigOpperman-e5z Rubbish, cops freely owned up to misidentifying the unfamiliar rifle at first, big freaking' deal, but of course, for paranoid crackpots, the idea a few police might have made a mistake is too incredible to consider, it's much more likely that somebody left the wrong kind of rifle lying around the crime scene for an army of searchers to find, certain that every cop to enter the building could be safely relied on to bend over backwards making himself an accessory to murder and treason...
What evidence?!.. Listen to me, ok?.. There is ZERO direct evidence of a conspiracy..
There’s video of the rifle’s recovery right here on RUclips.. Go watch it, Oswald’s rifle is recovered, not a Mauser..
Dang that’s crazy to think that as soon as her husbands head was shot, she quickly thought to grab all the pieces. Like I would never think to do that I’d just be sitting there yelling or something.
In addition to being First Lady, Jacqueline Kennedy was a Mother to two young children. Mother's are always picking up things that children drop. I believe her reactions were voluntary due to her role of being a Mother.
@@Mountain_Sage that's a bit of a stretch but possible I guess I would think it would be morebout of shock and maybe a humpty dumpty situation not to be cruel
@@MikeY-nh2we Dr. Pepper Jenkins stated that Jackie Kennedy walked into Trauma Room #1, with her hands cupped as if holding a baby bird. She handed him JFK's hair tissue and stated, "This might help." She had launched herself onto the trunk of the limousine within three seconds of the bullet striking JFK's head. In my previous post, I wish to correct her actions as "involuntary reactions" versus a voluntary reaction. Perhaps those who've picked up a child's pass-a-fire numerous times can weigh-in as to whether they even think about the action of retrieving the pass-a-fire. The visual image from the Zapruder Film and Dr. Jenkins statement attest to the fact that Mrs. Kennedy retrieved the human tissue. Her motives are uncertain, unless she has ever stated otherwise. She was not interviewed by either the FBI or the Warren Commission. This appears to be a glaring example an incomplete investigation at best, or a rigged investigation at it's worst. Your call.
@@Mountain_Sage that's what I mean when I said her actions were in relation to humpty dumpty she was sadly just trying to put all the pieces back together, I have raised 3 boys and have picked up plenty of pacifiers, bottles you name it but when witnessing you're loved ones head exploding I wouldn't be instantly picking up the pieces because of years of child rearing but in Hope's of saving my loved one
She was in shock of what had happened: She didnt even remember doing that
They drove him right into a snipers triangle. Either way,he was never making it to his next appearance. Sad but true. So many angles he could of been hit from that day.
He could have made it out, if the limo hadn't slowed down and stopped! They had been trying to assassinate De Gaulle and learned this little lesson because De Gaulle's driver would never slow down! He was shot at many more times than JFK, so the driver HAD to be in on it!
No bullets or fragments were ever found that were not matched to Oswald's rifle.
@@aaronz7056 like the completely intact round that was found on the hospital bed in the hallway at Parkland?
@@dougstyles You mean CE399, which is badly crushed at the nose?
If that was a planted bullet, no doubt you can explain how the guy planting it knew, all in advance:
(A) Connally had been shot at all
(B) the bullet wasn't still in his body
(C) how to get in and out of the emergency ward without being seen
(D) where exactly to plant it so it will be plausibly tied to Connally
(E) that the bullet isn't missing too much or too little lead
(F) that he's not planting one bullet too many into evidence and simply blowing the whole plot
(G) that the "real shooters" haven't been caught and are singing like canaries
(H) since the bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle, how he either got his hands on a bullet fired from that rifle or how he got to the ballistics boys on the Dallas P.D. and persuaded them to risk their necks for no gain whatsoever, obey illegal orders to falsify evidence, make themselves accessories to murder and treason and all trust each other implicitly never to crack, confess or finger each other for at least the next 58 years.
@@aaronz7056 Surely nobody knows how it got there. I have absolutely no clue. But whoever did,was probably eliminated within the next few hours. More questions than answers. Typical government mind games. Obviously we'll never %100 know what happened that day,and exactly who did what. Unfortunately we're just expected to move on with life.
It's incredible we've been told the head shot came from behind but Jackie clearly had said on camera that she climbed onto the back of the car to grab the piece of his head that had been blown off. Physics tells us all what that means.
Exactly 💯
the physics tells us that the piece came out as his head moved backward, or pieces were blown off in all directions, but the bullet initially moved JFK's head and most brain tissue and bone forward.
Uh, you are aware blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody seated forward in the limo, aren't you?
@@aaronz7056 indeed. That was to be expected when the bullet from behind hit hard bone. The video shows the blood and tissue pushed up and forward by the bullet from behind. The first few frames of the Zapruder film when seen frame by frame clearly shows JFK's head initially moving forward.
@@eameece never mind how the JFK film never addresses the seating arrangement in the limo. The lowered jump seat, more inward in the vehicle. The face that the actual bullet is actually deformed and not pristine as the conspiracy says. Connally’s back wound was a jagged wound, not a pristine bullet hole. The bullet lost speed and just tumbled, creating damage.
Who benefited the most? Lyndon B. Johnson and his military contracts. Why? Vietnam of course. One of the main things that President Kennedy wanted to do was pull all US personnel out of Southeast Asia. What was the first thing LBJ did the Gulf of Tonkin.
During the Vietnam War, the six largest military-industrial manufacturers in the US made half a TRILLION dollars in pure profit by supplying the American military, according to the book “Kill Zone - A Sniper Looks At Dealey Plaza” by Craig Roberts. Half a trillion dollars certainly seems like sufficient motive to assassinate a president.
@@krisaaron5771 Yes there are several motives which lead us to a massive conspiracy of many different groups. RFK's hounding and war on the mob you are looking at an insane amount of money and potentiallyendless conspirators there. Maybe not even mobsters per se,but politicians and businessman are all tied in with the mob too. You go after The Mob you are going after all of them. Then you have the Oil Depletion Allowance that saved The Oilmen millions and millions of Dollars that The Big Texas Oilman had to have. and LBJ gave to them...then Vietnam.
@@vernpascal1531 There conspiracies were made, but Oswald got to him first.
Ladybird Johnson sat on the board of directors at Bell Helicopters. The whole thing was a criminal enterprise to this day and has seen no justice except for the decline of the U.S. right before our very eyes. The chips are falling where they will.
@@vernpascal1531 well said sir
4th time I’ve watched it…gets better each time and more true each time! Thank you!
It ignores the mountain of ballistic, forensic, medical, film and eyewitness evidence demonstrating the shots all came from behind.
I think the multiple gunman theory is no longer theory. It’s fact. Blood splatter analysis is one of the most reliable aspects of modern forensic science and supports the multiple gunman, grassy knoll, explanation. Also, you can debate all day if Oswald could have made all those shots alone (he couldn’t). But you can’t debate the fact that a single gunman would have taken the much easier point blank and square to him shot as the car approached on Houston and closed prior to turning left on Elm. Go there yourself and judge for yourself. Nobody, and I mean absolutely nobody, waits for that shot on Elm unless it is part of a multiple shooter crossfire ambush.
One book claimed up to 20 shooters in Dealey Plaza and surrounds - teams that did not know about each other. To quote on of them "we were going for a head shot"
I can easily debate that.
Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid. If he opened fire on the limo on Houston he would have had time for only one shot before it sped up and rocketed past him, and it would have been instantly obvious to the Secret Service agents in the rear car exactly where the assassin was firing from, making him a dead duck. He was still a trained Marine and would have known this.
Oh, and the Connallys and the agents in the front seat of the limo were splattered with blood, negating the grassy knoll "explanation."
@@cobar5342 No evidence for that hilarious rubbish.
@@aaronz7056 Not enough room for it in your tiny mind
@@cobar5342 Well, that intelligent response loaded with overwhelming evidence changes my mind completely. Twenty assassins it is!
There are two very important factors that EVERYONE have not noticed until now. One Dealey plaza was the only part of the motorcade that was virtually cleared of onlookers when the shooting started. TWO there were two types of ammunition used both dum dum and steel jacketed. Most assassins don't change ammunition types in the middle of shooting at their targets.
Dealey Plaza was not "virtually cleared of onlookers," there were scores and scores of witnesses.
The shooter acted alone ? wtf lol ! - one gunman ? lol ! This so called lone gun man that keeps being mentioned had to be in 3 places of each location within seconds apart ! There is a super hero from Marvel Comic Book series - Called the "FLASH" That must have been the guy doing all the shooting ! lol !
@@hollywoodjoe123 a) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds.
b) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
c) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
d) Connally was seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to his right.
e) Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
f) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo, from behind.
g) Kennedy's massive exit wound seen exploding at the right temple is consistent only with a shot from behind.
h) Connally's said the shots came from behind.
i) Bullet recovered from the stretcher was also matched to Oswald's rifle.
j) That bullet is in a condition exactly consistent with going through Kennedy's body without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side.
k) If that bullet is a planted fake it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.
l) Witnesses directly under the window firmly said the shots came from directly overhead.
m) Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would have plainly seen any gunman there.
n) Zapruder's secretary was yards from the fence and said there was nobody there.
o) Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
p) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
q) It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while firing from multiple directions.
The Daley plaza was the only place where the assignation was possible. And there were not a lot of people around. Set up Set up Set up
@@daryljackson3430 I like how we are being lectured there was a set up by somebody who has no idea even how to spell Dealey Plaza.
Still waiting on the whole story. This has stayed with me all my life and I want the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth. They changed our course of history. Nothing can be made right until the whole story is told from beginning to end all truth. What a tragic loss those kids had to grow up with. A bad stain on our country. It seems the plan is to wait until all who were alive at that time are gone.
We Lost one of the Greatest Presidents ever. He Would Have Changed History by Ending the Fed. We Need the Truth.
Absolutely things would be a lot better now. We all know it was an inside job. Same thing going on with votes not being counted.
@@brendawise4365 How exactly do "we all know it was an inside job?" 58 years later and not one shred of REAL evidence to point at any group or person other than LHO. Please enlighten us.
@@JBliehall look up Howard hunt. Wh Bush was given stock and standard oil for his part. Also Howard hunt son still lives Dallas and has written a book. Mr Hunt gave a deathbed confession. Do your own research
@@JBliehall Sure when you try that hard not to be curious or knowledgeable you don't care..
Josiah Thompson was 86 here. He's still of sharp mind AND still has hair? That's my dude!
And still as demonstrably wrong as ever.
Also, why wouldn't Oswald shoot as they were coming up main? The turn onto elm wasn't planned so it wasn't known to the public so who had them make that turn and why?
Ooo
Oswald knew that shooting then would give away his position. He was still a trained marine. Last Podcast on the Left did a great and in depth series on the assassination. I highly suggest it.
The shot coming up Houston not main was blocked by the front windshield and furthermore by the roof bar between the driver and passengers. Watch the video at 25:39 . The turn onto Elm was well known and even published in the Dallas paper the day before the assassination.
@@sarahmathers6833 yup, Oliver stone tries to make something out of this, but your reasoning shows why. He might not have had the nerve to shoot him head on in the face either. But I've always thought it was about not giving his position away. Plus because of the downslope toward the railroad overpass, the shot from the sniper's nest didn't have to be adjusted virtaually at all for Oswald's second and third shot. He didn't have that on the approach to the TSBD
it was planned and previously noted in newspaper.
This is the best JFK assassination documentary I’ve ever seen.
"Back and to the left." I've read all the books. I've read the shirt tales. There is no chance it was one gun.
Agreed, maybe not so much for "Back & to the Left' but I just can't get by the fact that so many government officials, FBI, CIA, etc... so called experts, over almost 60yrs, when speaking on the assassination insist that Oswald was a lone shooter and it's just that simple. Then we're supposed to buy into the their theory that Ruby was so despondent over his sympathy for the Kennedy family he had to kill Oswald. Not to mention the Dallas police let Ruby wonder around freely that weekend.
So for arguements sake, let's say that's the whole story.
Then why in the world have they been afraid to release everything ?
Their own story and the fact they refuse to release the investigation, everything in it's entirety, doesn't hold water.
I was born at night, but not last night.
Three shots from the rear, Oswald fired the first two and the third was a .223 frag round. That said the real truth will never be told, nor should it because sometimes the truth is far to painful and conspiracy's are much easier to swallow.
Back and to the left means the entry wound would have entered at the back and exited front right, forcing his head back and to the left as it exploded out of the right side. Ballistic experts back this up 100%. Line that shot up and it leads you to the SS car behind.
Then the SS taking the car within minutes of arriving at the hospital and cleaning all the evidence that would have potentially helped them find the shooter, the fact the AR-15 disappeared, they tried their very best to get Jacks body out of the Autopsy room and the fact Hickey never came forward to speak about the accusations against him and you can see how this has been so intriguing all these years! They all knew what happened but couldn’t tell the truth so had to make all these wild decisions. Donahue nailed it simple as
@@Modelo118 Howard Donahue got 99% of it right. It's the last 1% which should never see the light of day. Because the job of the secret service is to protect the President of the United States, even after he's deceased. Which is what the secret service has been doing for almost sixty years.
Headshot from the front 1000 per cent.
The thing that cemented that there was more than one shooter was JFK's head moving backwards, and the timing of the shots. To reload and accurately fire a rifle in that succession like that is unfathomable. Especially the analysis of the debris fields at the end. What an excellent documentary
Direction a person's head goes is meaningless regarding what direction the bullet came from.
Limo sped up abruptly at the same time.
3 shots over 8-9 seconds (as victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate) is child's play for a trained Marine.
It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
Autopsy shows the shots all came from behind.
Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody seated forward in the limo.
@@aaronz7056skull fragments were found consistent with a 2nd shooter though? Like to the left rear of when the fatal shot was taken?
@@youngpitty97 Harper fragment was in fact found forward of Kennedy's location during the head shot.
@@aaronz7056You are seriously messed up in the head. Jesus Christ.
@@aaronz7056 Total nonsense as usual from your comments. Harper fragment was fount BACK not forward (I assume you got this evidence from CIA friend- Bugliosi), Mrs Kennedy picked up fragment at the back of car not forward, policemen were hit with debris at the back to the left not forward, Clint and Sam Kinney also witnessed blood matter at the back NOT forward - there is so much evidence that points to more than one shooter but your tunnel vision cannot see it.
If Oswald was acting in his statements he deserves an oscar
“They have taken me in because I lived in the Soviet Union… I’m just a patsy”..
He connected his arrest to his defection, not a conspiracy?.. Pretty obvious what he’s doing there, trying to poison a potential jury pool..
This is exactly why it’s never a good idea to let a double murder suspect give a press conference.. lol..
Warren report and 9/11 report must have the same authors 😂😂😂
Like
Right, same government responsible
I showed the Zapruder film to my Doctor (who said he had never seen it before) and he said even the throat shot would have been VERY questionable if he could have survived!!!
That's interesting because I recall some of the Parkland surgeons attending to Kennedy saying they felt the throat wound alone would have been highly survivable in that the bullet had not struck any major artery or organ (he was not bleeding profusely from that wound) nor did it hit his spinal cord or any bone..and he was at the hospital within several minutes...whether it would have affected his speech or overall health is up for debate probably. Anyway, I'm sure your doctor would amend his opinion if he knew those facts.
But, the bullet traveled clean through, tearing only soft tissue and part of the larynx. In fact, the exit wound happened to be right were an incision was made (only had to enlarged slightly) to insert a breathing tube (laryngectomy or tracheostomy). The thing that sucks is that as JFK was clearly aware that he had been shot through the throat (grabbing his neck, Jackie even reported that he exclaimed "Ive been shot!!!"), he could have ducked down in his seat or to the floor of the car to avoid the fatal shot that was to come, if he were not wearing a large back brace that made this impossible!!! I suppose he was so surprised or in mild shock, but he was a WW2 veteran who saw action and was certainly no stranger to being under fire or the imminent threat of it in the Pacific Islands. Even with the brace one would think he could have leaned himself over, covering his wife of course, or rolled to the floor. It would not have looked very dignified, but it might have saved that poor man.
@@michaelesgro9506 i certainly don't understand why he didnt duck with his wife down ...
his airway was obstructed and he could not be intubated, so a tracheostomy was done. He would have been without oxygen 6-7 minute to get to Parkland. Normally you would just intubate him through the trachea
The Zapruder film was edited within 48 hours of being filmed.
@All Law He WAS threatening the police with an air rifle...
The CIA and MOSSAD did it. Case closed.
Bingo
ahHAAA! we got em!
Own dogs bit him, mos def. He wanted to break CIA, reign in the rogues and paid for it. When Clinton asked for the ufo-files, his staffer (Podesta) was basically told he better quit pushing it or he might end up same way as JFK. I take it as confession.
We look forward to you now presenting your ironclad evidence of course.
@@aaronz7056 Ironclad hu? Everything that you belive is backed up with Ironclad evidence? If you are actually interested in knowing, then I would recommend the documentry NUMEC: How Israel Stole the Atomic Bomb, and/or War by Deception both by Ryan Dawson .
The Short answer: JFK was trying to prevent Israel from becoming a nuclear power and he also wanted to disband secret societies.
This was a great documentary. Even if you believe Oswald was the lone assassin this clearly makes a solid case for for conspiracy. There is one point nobody has raised which has often made me wonder. Why was Oswald the only employee that left the Texas Book Depository after the assassination? And why did he sneak into a movie theater? If he was just a patsy and not involved, why would he want the police to raise further suspicions about him by leaving mid day? There are a lot of questions we will never have the answer for. What bothers me the most are those who declare case closed and Oswald was the lone gunman. I don't think anyone can definitively conclude that.
Oswald was not the only one who left after the Assassination as it was a chaotic Zoo. Even though as anyone who reads my posts know that I'm 1000% conspiracy, that Oswald's actions are not indicative of an entirely innocent person. You don't hang around JFK Haters and main suspects Ferrie, DeM,Phillips, Banister, Shaw, Thornley etc and be squeaky clean. If he was innocent he would have made sure he couldn't have been framed by standing on the steps out front and telling several co-workers.
Oswald was the only TSBD employee *inside* the building who immediately fled the building after the assassination, thus the only one to leave who would not have had an alibi by being out in plain sight during the shooting.
But 90 seconds after the last shot? So calm and under control? No sign of stress? Not out if breath despite descending several flights of stairs in seconds? Able to engage with law enforcement after committing the biggest crime in the US that century? No expert - I am just a nurse - but I find that highly unlikely.
@@garethfieldstead7547 Able to engage? He stood there blank-faced. 90 seconds is sufficient time for a young man in good shape to make it down those stairs, he wouldn't have to be out of breath.
@@aaronz7056 yet was visibly distressed when advised by the press he was about to be charged for the assassination. Haven't read anywhere that he was temporarily mute when confronted by the police in the TSBD. The guy must have had nerves of steel - or he was just a patsy. I believe the latter.
Eisenhower and Truman refused to attend the inauguration of Johnson. They knew
Shoot a melon or any sphere filled with fluid with a high powered rifle round and there will be a small hole where the bullet enters and a much larger hole where the bullet exits accompanied by exploding gas and fluid. Simple physics.
You can also observe this phenomenon when a window is struck by a BB. There will be a tiny 1/8" hole where the pellet hits the glass and a cone-shaped hole expanding from 3/4" to 1"" on the other side.
Not the other way around, sorry.
I've seen about a dozen documentaries on this since Stone's film came out. This is easily the best one I've ever seen. The arguments are well backed up and researched with plenty of supporting evidence. Johnson's phone call recording was stunning yet logical: perhaps the reason for the cover up was to prevent WW3.
Watch Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick
@@WinstonSmith24💯
I have watched it several times. SMH! 😢😭😢
@@WinstonSmith24 I'll check it out. I watched the first minute of it and looks interesting. I recently saw Inside Job and that was absolutely mind-blowing: also about the greed and unchecked power of the banking industry.
Oswald was a dead man walking. A patsy and he finally realized it when he got framed for the Tippit shooting.
Yes I agree, the phone call is stunning. And there's no doubt that a no-conspiracy conclusion was more convenient for the Gov't than a Russian or Cuban conspiracy, but that does not mean there was such a conspiracy. The physical evidence genuinely supports a single-shooter scenario involving Oswald's rifle and the 6th floor window of the Book Depository. The autopsy clearly establishes an entrance wound in the rear of the head and a massive exit wound on the upper-right side. The exit impact and wound are clearly visible on the Zapruder film. Moreover, Oswald is THE LAST person anyone would recruit into a high-level conspiracy. The man didn't drive or have access to his own car. Nothing wrong with that - i don't have one either - but we're not talking James Bond material here.
Thank u for this. It's disappointing I can never find conspiracy documentaries on yt about this or really anything anymore. It's a loss that they erased all Jessie Ventura conspiracy theory shows from yt and just about everywhere. I really enjoyed that show.
Anyways thank you for uploading this. Much appreciated.
That's thanks to Big Tech wanting you to only think inside the box.
There’s a bunch of them you just have to keep scrolling down when you search for it keep scrolling and scrolling down get passed all the mainstream BS and you’ll find a bunch I have a ton of them in my library not sure if you can see mine but if you can go for it I got em under JFK got another one labelled conspiracy with all sorts of stuff in it
watch the docu from peter r de vries on jfk. It goes much deeper into detail than this but is partially in dutch. Peter was an investigating journalist who was killed last year.
Jessie Ventura is a paranoid kook.
The house committee most ridiculous conclusion is its possible Oswald and someonelse were shooting at jfk at the same time but weren't working together. Aka the two lone nuts theory. .
Think it’s safe to read between the lines
that was good Scott ! - very ridiculous . Prof. Blakey ...oh man. Hear Robert Groden about him - he is no fan of the Prof.
Glad to see RUclips providing an Encyclopedia Britanica link to tell us what really happened. So pleased that the tech nerds of silicon valley are so all knowing
The Encyclopedia Brintannica (disappointingly) states that Oswald was the shooter.
His tears say it all at the end of documentary, when asked " but don't you wanna know WHO it was after all that investigating?" He'd want to but how many people have died who've come eerily close to the answer?
And yes, i like many in this country who LOVED him are left asking the question: what might've been had he lived?
All credible evidence still points right at Oswald and who "died" who "came eerily close to the answer?"
@aaronz7056. How old are you if I may ask? I ask, because anyone who believes that Lee H.Oswald is the " lone gunman" is really missing blatant efforts made by culpable elements/people so JFK'S ASSASSINATION forever remains a mystery. For me , since the age of 6 have been a firm believer that the truth is in plain sight.
It is more important,if we are to know, to ask the correct questions.
"...up and to the left." If anything L.H.O., was indeed who he said - a patsy. History, does repeat itself.
Most importantly and tragedy VIETNAM WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN, JUST AS PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY AVOIDED THE CUBA WAR.
Most importantly and tragedy VIETNAM WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN, JUST AS PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY AVOIDED THE CUBA WAR.
Great piece! Ya can’t really argue that bullets weren’t coming from different directions considering the splatter. It’s like once they caught Oswald they just stuck their head in the sand and went with that. Sad and infuriating at the same time. ☮️
I await the day a conspiracy theorist explains how a gang assumed they could make this look like the work of one assassin as they blazed away at the victim from multiple, almost opposite directions.
@@aaronz7056 Just read the reports of the full Medical Personnel at both Hospitals, and that will Enlighten you. Palamara JFK From Parkland To Bethesda. Very important book.
@@vernpascal1531 No doubt you can also enlighten me as to how a conspiracy could have known Oswald would show up at the Paine house Nov 21, or that he wouldn't simply stand out on the sidewalk to watch the parade, or that he would immediately flee the TSBD, or how they could guarantee not one of the scores of police searching the plaza ever found one bullet or fragment that was not matched directly to Oswald's rifle, etc.
@@vernpascal1531 I seem to remember someone at the Autopsy, stating that he was handed a small bag of bullet fragments, and was told to place them in the presidents head. They were different from the other bullets.
@@lew832 There is so much evidence of extra bullets and fragments it's not funny. It would take awhile to post it,but The Mortician Tom Robinson said about 10 fragments were taken from the head wound and placed into a bag and disappeared. I also talked to Officer Of The Day Dennis David at a JFK Conf. and he was adamant that he typed up a receipt for more than one bullet,but less than 2, in 4 fragments that also disappeared.
I was just six months old when this happened. My parents, grandparents and everyone who was older talked about this and the Warren Commission. They were patriotic people, that trusted the government after WW2 and the Depression. Eisenhower was another name they trusted well. After the JFK assassination they were less trusting of the government and were more cynical about the Federal government. The actions by the Warren Commission and other state leaders, did just as much damage to the relationship of the Citizen towards their government, which they thought represented them. Now everything is a conspiracy. All the motives of the government are called into question, depending on who is in power. Oswald and co-conspirators killed Kennedy, but the government killed all trust with the people. After Watergate and other scandals, especially when they start to spin the truth, every incident becomes a Dealey Plaza Maze of information. As to second shooters, it's a wonder that none of that "backup" have came forward with evidence, over 59 years. No one broke silence, No one confessed on their death bed. Patriotism and trust died at Dealey Plaza as well.
Nice speech, especially the part about why don’t more criminals just confess. Now what was exposed or confessed to? Business plot, coup in Iran and Guatemala, gulf of Tonkin, conspiracy to do mlk, watergate, mk ultra, Iran contra. You do the math.
Check out E. Howard Hunt, and his deathbed confession. For starters, look at his Wikipedia page.
@@ykst6685 Yeah even when someone who lies about where they were 11-22-63 and is hooked up with other major suspects confesses, and we can't believe him? Even if you take Hunt out of the equation there's a pretty good circumstantial case against those he named.
No one broke their silence because the top dogs killed them all! DUH! I was 8 yo when this happened and I didn't even believe it! When we watched Oswald murdered surrounded by 75 or more policemen, didn't have to be a brain surgeon to know he was a patsy! The government/deep state doesn't have enough brains to operate outside of what they have been doing for decades. That's why it is so easy to stop their fingerprints on events!
@@vernpascal1531 dont forget Elvis's death and 9/11, they too were cover up...not to mention Bruce Lee and Brandon Lee's death
Lyndon Johnson was the main man behind the death of John Kennedy
Much evidence points to LBJ, yes.
I have said that all these years.People tell me I am nuts.I watched it as it happened.The most awful thing for his family and this country.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Allen Dulles
LBJ was a puppet for a Military Complex made up those to profit from Red Scare. I see Hoover as a key player
@@captainamerica6525 Another conspiracy factoid. Please link us to "much evidence." Moronic conspiracy websites with long unreferenced diatribes don't count.
Probably the BEST documentary I've EVER seen.
Wow. This is it. Thank you!
As I write this in 2022, nearly every Wikipedia article relating to the JFK assassination goes out of its way to adopt the Warren report conclusions. In each sentence that begins to address an inconsistency of scientific evidence and testimony, that same well is poisoned within the first three words, by language that casts doubt on things that haven't even been said yet. And I am so completely disgusted.
Sixty years later, the video publicly available, the audio in hand since the late 70's, syncing perfectly to evidence the truth... That I have to dig and dig and dig to get past the firewall of obfuscation that is STILL built around these facts. The continuing effort to sell a lie that no majority of Americans has EVER believed. And here we stand: Whatever is at the heart of this conspiracy continues to be regarded by those who covered it up, and moreso their offices' successors, that government funds and manpower are - to this day - dedicated to erecting smokescreens to conceal it; Buying studies from frauds, to refute it.
And the dead! So many dead. Journalists, witnesses, investigators, police officers. My god! Thanks for nothing, America. In the words of MLK: "I know I won't get there with ya'. I'm moving to Canada."
I'd rather be a Conspiracy Theorist than a B.S. Believer -- just sayin.
The lack of the whole truth gives way to conspiracy. The problem that has developed over the years since the assassination, is that the American people can't tell the difference between the two.
@@gpiano88 It isn't just conspiracy. it is conspiracy after conspiracy to deny the truth. Everywhere you look in the JFK Assassination it's conspiracy after conspiracy...
why? did you watch the whole video? Did you even know what they did? and how old are you?
Those two terms are synonymous. Conspiracy theorists ARE B.S. believers.
@@eameece What do you mean? Wait for a second, what do you mean by "B.S. believers" (not joking, I'm asking for real, so don't roast me)
Is shocking to see the limousine slow to a near stop for the kill shot. This is been discussed in other JFK documentaries, but the first time I could see it so clearly for myself. 51:27
The driver shot him
Thank you ,that never stood out till you said it!
@@gking300so you telling me the driver choosing to stop the car in the middle of a ride in front of dozens of people, bystanders (some taking pictures, some filming) in front of a bunch of secret service,
then he turns around shoots jfk in the head, turns back around and just drives like normal?
and nobody in the car saw it?
he could have done it under the bridge or literally at any other point but this makes literally zero sense at all.
and since your comment has one like i think you liked your own comment.
or found somebody who cant think for even three seconds, too.
I have seen a number of these documentaries on the president's assassination. However, none of them ever mention why it is the presidential car drove so slowly on Elm Street. In fact before the final shot the vehicle had almost stopped. Why would the driver do that, and not be speeding away from danger at that point ?
It is bizarre, but the thinking was different back then though and we have the gift of hindsight. From the Secret Service’s perspective alone, all but one assassination attempt on a president was on foot rather than in a car. That attempt was on FDR, killing Chicago mayor Cermack. The car was not moving at the time. Now, the drivers of the vehicles in JFK’s motorcade stated they thought it was firecrackers, not gunshots. SS agent Clint Hill has stated they did not sound like rifle shots to him and he was near the front of the depository building at the time of the shots.
The car slowed down to make the sharp 120-degree turn onto Elm from Houston. They didn't recognize the first shot. The heard the second shot. Greer slowed the car but did not stop it. He was looking around to see what happened. Then the third shot came. I don't know why he took too long to speed up and make evasive moves. The car in front might have had to speed up too. I presume JFK and his crew were not expecting trouble, and they wanted to be visible and enjoy the crowd. It was a political trip. People just got complacent and careless, including JFK. And people today let Jackie off the hook. That is understandable, but why didn't she pull her husband down into the seat like Nellie Connally did for her husband? Why people didn't react fast enough is a question, but it's hard to believe their behavior was deliberate.
@@eameeceexactly, information is not hard to find when someone is willing to look
By leaving the rifle where it was found, Oswald had to know he'd be identified as the owner, which leaves the age old question: if he did this, what was his plan? He was a known employee of the School Book Depository, knew they'd find that out, find the rifle.....and yet he just goes to a movie theatre and waits to be caught? If he's guilty, his behavior has never made sense.
He ducked into the theater to dodge the police pouring into the area after he panicked and shot Officer Tippit. Caught inside, he promptly tried to shoot the first cop to approach him.
He went to the movie theater to people in the movie theater can see if police would do to him any were else know one would have seen any thing and get away with it
I think the guy's hands were dark because he didn't put the gun in his trunk, he put it in his Engine bay, taking it from his engine bay, pretending to be fixing his car or checking it, then putting it back in his engine bay. No one checks the engine bay. Probably right at the grill is the best place, in front of the radiator if they had one. Easy. Not the dirtiest place but you can get dirty pretty fast working on a car, hiding something. Anyone come up with that theory? 🧠💡
Anyone ever tried testing for gun powder residue on the fence next to the tree? Anyone look for shells? Who was on that team? Was the parking lot metered? Paid? What is the parking lot for? What business?
Sheriff’s Office controlled access to the parking lot. Trail starts with Sheriff Decker....
Intriguing thought. Had never considered it. Makes sense with Officer Smith saw. And if the cars were checked, the engine compartment probably would not have been. Instead of running or being seen trying to leave the area, hide the rifle and present credentials.
Ed Hoffman a deaf mute was the only witness to the shooter. His story is detailed in Men Who Kill Kennedy and Beyond The Fence Line. He saw a man shoot from the knoll behind the fence further down than Josiah Thompson suggests in this fine Documentary and this man gave the rifle to someone dressed as a RR Worker..he immediately broke it down and placed in a large tool bag and walked leisurely toward the train on the tracks behind the Grassy Knoll and Parking lot. The other man who fired in a Business suit walked slowly behind the fence toward the Pergola Structure. Hoffman was warned by his Father that he wouldn't be believed. Even though he had high personal integrity. That's exactly what happened. As soon as Oswald was arrested dozens and dozens of witnesses who saw or heard something besides Lone Nut Oswald were ignored or worse.
@@Autshot20 Guns look awefully similar to engine parts too if taken apart, and those bumpers have lots of room in them
Enjoyed reading your comment. Great point. I believe a kid and his dad found a bit shell casing in the 1990s right behind the fence. Exactly what James Files said he did. Bit the shell casing and left it as a token. A stupid move he later admitted.
This docu got me hooked! Well balanced i think, it was not afraid to call out the researcher's methods.
I’m concerned that a secret service agent in charge of protecting the president and his wife would say he heard an explosion over his right shoulder and it didn’t sound like a gunshot, more like a firecracker. I would assume the detail was briefed prior to the parade that Dallas was not considered friendly territory for the Kennedy’s. Yet, his first thought of an explosion in that setting was a firecracker. I can tell you from experience of hearing a firecracker in an urban setting, that anyone who doesn’t think it sounds like a gunshot isn’t well trained on firearms and shouldn’t be on a protection detail. His first reaction should have been gunshot, not firecracker. The agent may have been a good man, and did react once he saw JFK hit, but I’m just surprised by the statement. But that’s just my opinion.
And the assassination was coordinated by CIA, mafia and local players in Dallas. I think they truly believed JFK was a threat to the nation and they were doing the nation a service. As they did RFK and MLK. LBJ was an evil man. Who at least had knowledge of the assassination plan, and was the beneficiary as he hated the Kennedy’s. The fingerprint of Malcom Wallace was found at the crime scene. Wallace, known by many as the personal assassin for LBJ. Wallace was killed on Route 271 in Pittsburg Texas in January 1971 when his car veered off the road and struck a bridge abutment at age 50. No ice, no water on road noted by the patrolman. Many have been killed over the years to keep truth from being revealed. LBJ dies 1973. The man was responsible for much pain in the world.
My guess is we will never know the entire truth and all the players involved. Even if we did, half the country wouldn’t believe it. You have to find truth for yourselves. Why are the JFK files still sealed after 50 plus years?
the secret service was in on the assassination of JFK and it probably wasnt the first time
@ could be
A lot more people died to ensure the truth never got out. As long as the main players like LBJ CIA FBI get exposed the smaller players are irrelevant
@@emmasanders6226 the elites have no interests in compassion for people or human lives, only self preservation, money and power.
@@truthmarshal6627 I agree
Imagine how history would’ve changed if he survived…
There is a book called 11/22/63 about a man who goes back and tries to stop the assassination. It’s an interesting read, they also made a show about it.
@@Snowpaw24 Oh yes, by Stephen King. That's a good book. I have it on audio.
Maybe the CIA would be history by now.
If Kennedy was a president Israel will not have posses nuclear power
I've often said that very thing.
This is the best JFK documentary I’ve seen so far
JFK assassination conspiracy theory books and videos are a highly profitable industry. There are better ways to waste your money.
@@brindlekintales I don't think they are that profitable. Imagine if the mainstream Media actually was interested in the truth? Instead of mindless debunking, which never goes anywhere, since it was a large high level conspiracy with multiple groups and many people involved in Different Cities and Countries.
@@brindlekintales Highly profitable?! That is incorrect. Most of the researchers use their own funds to perform their work. Do you think Vincent B and Posner profited from their work?
Bugliosi was a nutbag. Tom O'Neil. CHAOS. tells a lot about what a lying sack Vince was.
Try Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald by PBS Frontline.
The Abraham Zapruder film was the one thing LBJ and the government assassination squads did not count on.
What a series of conveniences! An assassination of the most powerful man on the planet and the situation handled like a circus. Oswald was to much of a perfect scapegoat
Your scapegoat owned and smuggled the rifle, lied to police about his whereabouts, immediately fled the plaza, was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses shooting a cop and fleeing, was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop, refused to cooperate with any investigator, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
What we see at the end of the Zapruder Film is what we should have seen at the start of the Zapruder film - The Limo should have sped off at the first sound of firecrackers!!!!!!
Arron, The limo was a 1963 Lincoln convertible. It weighed > 4,000 pounds and had an abysmal small V-8 engine. He couldn't have sped up even if he reacted to the first shot that everyone, including the PD motorcycle detail, thought was a backfire. The time from the second to 3rd and fatal shot was
At 9:11 just as the film cuts you can see a flash from behind the picket fence
Why would that footage stop right at that point
All credible ballistic, film, forensic, eyewitness and medical evidence demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
"it's a rich man's trick" is by far the best documentary about JFK's assassination
The fact that you can see her go to the trunk and grab skull fragments but yes let’s all keep thinking the shot came from the back wake up
The Connallys were also spattered with brain tissue, etc.
I saw her running for her life.
John Kennedy - had so many powerful enemies - the mind boggles.
The head of the US Mafia - Sam Giancana's girlfriend - the beautiful Judith Exner was having an
affair with John Kennedy. No doubt Giancana was suitably impressed.
John Kennedy's brother Robert as Attorney General , was also conducting an almost private war
directed against the mafia leadership across the USA .
The whole Cuban fraternity living in the US ' loved John Kennedy ' after he withdrew formal US support for the botched invasion of Cuba .
Many hundreds of Cuban emigres were either killed or imprisoned by Castro forces as a result .
The CIA 'loved ' him as well ,for his many threats aimed at dismantling that organization.
His closest 'political ' colleagues also loved him - not least Lyndon B. Johnson.
With so many powerful enemies - it was only a matter of time before he was KILLED
You can see this guy only stayed at the shooting site.
i don’t care what they say the bullet that blew his face came from another direction , you can see that his brain matter is blown towards his back so he was shot from the front!!
Blood and gore went in all directions, splattering the Connallys and the agents in the front seat.
Dealey Plaza was a shooting gallery on November 22, 1963. I am one of those who don't believe Oswald shot any gun that never mind the gun(s) that killed JFK.
The one ☝🏾 thing I’ve always felt even as a child coming from a family of 6 siblings. Is what a horrific traumatic horrible way for one ☝🏾 of my siblings to die. And to have it replayed so publicly over and over again how traumatizing it must be for the Kennedy family. RIP JFK
Bobby Jackie Ted Ann 🙏🏼
RFK and Joe Sr. died horrific deaths.
And John Jr. as well.
The Kennedys, for many years, had a part in concealing Z-Film Frames, 312, 313, 314. But why? Was it because left-handed Jackie shot Jack? Both shots had to likely come from within the vehicle.
Clint Hill was Jackie's personal body guard. He took the evidence of gun smoked pink hat, and white gloves, and likely the small gun, and shell. Ask him, why?
@@bobma6342Karma.. these guys weren't the nice guys you have been led to believe.. Karma always wins..
@@dyoungdyounglast6336¹
Thanks to ABC and all the experts that invested their time to find out the truth, now we all can know a lot more of what was going on ... It was just beyond tragic.
JACK LAWRENCE - storm drain shooter. Frame 313 Zapruder film. 6 feet above JFK the bullet exiting, STRAIGHT UP n forward. (part of CIA/MOSSAD organised this) Permindex/Louis Bloomfield).
@@mogadon7 No evidence for any of that garbage.
@@aaronz7056 Read conversation with the crow
@@thenotorious0606 How about you read Jim Bishop, or Norman Mailer, or Gerald Posner, or Dale Meyers, or those covering the case at the time, or the investigators who investigated it, instead of crackpot and uncorroborated paranoia?
@@aaronz7056 Read Bugliosi’s Reclaiming History. It debunks every single whacked out conspiracy theory. 20 years of research went into the book.
He was shot from the front right anybody and everybody with basic understanding and logic of physics of impact from a bullet knows the fact of truth......
No bullets or fragments were ever found that were not matched to Oswald's gun.
JFK had one entrance wound on the back of the skull, and a resulting massive exit wound exploding outward at the right temple, an impossible shot from the knoll but a clear and direct one from Oswald's window.
JFK's head goes forward slightly at the instant of impact (as per scientific standard) and the direction a person's head goes after that is meaningless regarding what direction a bullet came from. Inner neurological reactions to the massive damage, JFK's back brace, the movement of the limo and Jackie tugging on him explain the rest.
Negating all this would mean some conspiracy knew it could safely approach and successfully recruit all of the police who searched the plaza, the ballistics boys on the department, the pathologists, X-ray technicians and military personnel at Bethesda (where Jackie herself asked at the last minute her husband's body be taken) and persuade them risk their necks, obey illegal orders, and make themselves accessories to murder and treason (instead of taking the safer and simpler route of just saying Oswald must have had an accomplice who got away... which they didn't).
@@aaronz7056 Cmon man you cant say the direction the head went is meaningless,dont start blaming his neck brace FFS
@@Gos1234567 I repeat, the direction a person's head goes on being shot is meaningless regarding the direction the bullet came from. It's not like being punched by a fist, you know. I note you didn't address or explain away one single point I made.
@@aaronz7056 is that actually true though?Is this a common thing In ballistics ??
@@Gos1234567 Common enough, plus the points I just made above and all the other credible evidence against Oswald paints a pretty damning picture on old Lee...
Amazing documentary, thanks for sharing! I just hoped they could mention Mr. James Tague and his cheek wound...
By far the most comprehensive documentary with interviews of the MANY witnesses is the 9 hour series (The Men Who Killed Kennedy) which is still available on RUclips.
The emergency room docs who tried to save JFK are interviewed and fully describe the head wound they saw. Men who actually saw the two shooters at the Grassy Knoll and the actual gun they used are interviewed. The German Mauser originally found in the Book Depository, before the Carcano emerged, is also shown. Texas Gov Connelly appears and clearly explains that the shot that hit him was NOT the shot that hit JFK. HUH? More than three shots? Conspiracy! Of course, if you believe in magic bullets, this all means nothing to you!
The Men Who Killed Kennedy is hilarious: the creators of that obviously bought any conspiracy theory they were told as gospel. (My favourite is Gordon Arnold.)
@@aaronz7056 the fact is there was a conspiracy. It's the specifics that are debatable. Fact is, based on photographic evidence, ballistic evidence, forensic evidence, and eyewitness testimony, more than 3 shots were fired and there was more than 1 assassin. The exact number of shots and assassins will realistically never be known.
@@JFKJustTheFacts Relax, there was no conspiracy. All that would have been needed then was one marksman who could peel off a disguise and disappear, leaving the authorities with an unsolved mystery on their hands.
"Photographic evidence..." Could you be a little more vague, please?
"Ballistics evidence..." The only bullets, shells or fragments ever found in the plaza, limo or victims came from Oswald's rifle, exclusively. The single bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with one that has gone through one body, then slowed and tumbled as it went through a second.
"Forensics evidence..." Okay: the wounds on JFK and Connally line up perfectly regarding Connally's position when the bullet hit them both. Multiple computer analysis tests demonstrate the wounds also line up on a perfect trajectory to Oswald's window. JFK had one cratered entrance wound on the back of his skull and the bullet exploded outward at his right temple. No other wounds, no other shooters.
"Eyewitness testimony..." Again, that's so vague what do you ever refer to? Of course, there's nothing on earth more shaky and unreliable than eyewitness testimony, but for the record, virtually every newsman in the motorcade or within earshot of the plaza firmly heard three shots. Guys on the lower floor of the TSBD firmly heard three shots fired from overhead. All evidence points to shot # 1 deflected by the tree branch and exploding in a spray of dust behind the car, #2 drilling both victims and #3 hitting JFK in the head.
I still await the day a conspiracy theorist persuasively explains how a conspiracy could ever have predicted in a million years how they could immediately make this look like the work of just one shooter as they blazed away at JFK from multiple, almost opposite directions.
Disinformation, government sponsored propaganda and pure B.S.
@@user6008 um did you watch the documentary?
Oswald was a patsy!
This video is amazing and very enlightening!
Thank you for sharing!
Your "patsy" shot a cop, was caught trying to shoot a second cop, fought like a complete maniac, lied to police, refused to cooperate with investigators, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, made no attempt to blow any conspiracy to anybody, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
He was the fall guy!
@@margaretreid5655 There is a lot of evidence suggesting this. By amazing coincidence (sarcasm) Vallee in Chicago seemed to be also being set up for patsy status (although much more research would be needed to prove this).
@@margaretreid5655 Your "fall guy" owned and smuggled the rifle, lied to police about his whereabouts, immediately fled the crime scene, shot a cop, was caught trying to shoot a second cop, refused to cooperate, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@JfK--OBJECTivE And how, exactly did the sinister men setting up this patsy know:
- he would show up unexpectedly at the Paine house Nov. 21, otherwise they can't pretend he smuggled the rifle Nov. 22
- he would lie to police about his whereabouts during the shooting
- nobody would ever find any bullets or fragments that don't match to his gun
- he would immediately flee the plaza after the shooting
- Officer Tippit wouldn't simply outdraw and capture his attacker, blowing the whole plot then and there
- Oswald would agree to help frame himself getting caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop
- the Dallas PD was guaranteed to be on board for the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children
- Oswald would refuse to cooperate and never blow any conspiracy to anybody
- they could safely approach scores of witnesses, police, FBI, Secret Service, ballistics experts, military personnel, pathologists, whole commissions, Oswald family members, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason?
We note that the first and second shots were too close together as does the fourth and fifth shots to be from one shooter with a bolt action rifle. Thus there were st least two shooters.
This is so obvious that it is completely ignored. One of the largest open secrets in history. Everyone who looks at the evidence can tell within a few minutes that there was more than one shooter. Single bullet theory is incredibly the whole key to the warren report.
At lease 3-4 shooters timed their shots in unison to sound as 3 shots. At least 8 shots fired.
@@jackzaccardi1896 We note that there is evidence of small caliber bullets. Why? They are easier to muffle with a silencer. One could be a common .243 to the skull, the perfect flat shooting Police/Military sniper rifle round. Dr, James Humes head of the autopsy team measured a 6. 0 mm hole to skull. A 6.0 mm is a .243! Hummmm
why is the interview of james files removed from youtube? He told in detail where he stood at grassy knoll, and even said he used to make a bite mark on the casing. a casing were found at the grassy knoll, and there were also a bitemark on it. James files said it was his signature to make a bitemark on the casing after a hit.
It's still on here I just watched it yesterday
There is no way one gunman can shoot then rack another round, aim and shoot that quickly for the final 2 shots when they dubbed the gunshot sound over the film.
Except that it’s been shown that one gun man can.
Those weren't gun shots, according to the 1980s investigators.
@Dope Cat no they weren't ..in the 60s top marksmen tried it...fir a documentary only 1 pulled it off on his third attempt and he was one of the best shooters at the time...the rest failed
@Dope Cat a us Corp top marksman with double digits kills like nearly 100 tried it and said that it was impossible look at the comments section of the recreation from the old documentary there's 🇺🇸 snipers on there openly commenting that it was almost impossible....to replicate it in a controlled environment with multiple attempts is one thing to do that with adrenaline pumping and in real time is almost impossible ....if he did pull it off then he's the greatest marksman ever to live
The 3 shots took 8.3 seconds, not 6.
Fantastic!! One of the best JFK documentary's I've ever seen. Josiah Thompson I believe is an American hero and a masterful investigator. I hope we finally get to find out the truth this december. I highly doubt it because it could implicate wrongdoing by important people but at least we could at least know who was behind it and why.
RIP JFK-the greatest president in american history.
Yup, don't listen to anyone who denies the main points, which he proves with logic and strong evidence. Headshot from knoll. Almost simultaneous rear headshot, that shows blood and brain spatter 2 different distinct directions.
We know who was behind it, Lee Oswald, all by his lonesome.... all, all, all by his lonesome. Anyone who tells you different hasn't read the truth, found the truth or read the life of Oswald. The conspiracy boys & girls? Fools & charlatans...
What happens in december?
They gonna re open the case and reviel what happend with all ballistic and such?
I long time thought it was work of the maffia with several shooters.
We should already know who was behind it!! Whoever was behind Lyndon Johnson!
The Gvt documents from the time clearly show that JFK was willing to take the CMC all the way to nuclear war!! Thank God Khrushchev was not as insane as JFK, and backed down and removed the missiles from Cuba. Otherwise, there'd be no internet for you to make your comment.
This is one of the best documentaries that I've seen, and yes i agree with its findings, but there is the who and why to consider and that i fear we shall never now for if we did governments would fall . Those few seconds changed the world forever.
The Why is Kennedy's Speak of Ending The Federal Reserve BOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!
@@shawnbruce6934 Oh it is? Then im sure, you can tell me the purpose of a federal reserve, and how blowing it up, would serve anyone's goal?
The best documentary on the Assassination is “a coup in Camelot”.
The best is Frontline's Who was Lee Harvey Oswald
@@Orcawhale1 not literally! He means getting rid of the federal reserve period!
Three curious facts about the case have always intrigued me to stay interested in the assassination. First , Oswald was hired or had his job given to him 6 weeks prior to the event. Second , the route was changed only days prior to the event and contrary to what any secret service will tell you about securing the president. Third , why wouldn't Oswald be watching the event like everyone else? I strongly feel he knew he had been set up and desperately tried to run not even knowing where to run to.
Exactly he was part of the abort team he realized he was being set up when the CIA agent he was suppose to call never answered the call.He was a patsy realized that and tried to run.
Here's the biggest problem with the motorcade route. It had long been known that to hit someone in a moving vehicle you had to slow it down. It doesn't matter if you have the world's best sniper in an optimum firing position - if the target is moving at speed (anything beyond 20 mph) you've got major problems. And if that target is moving on each of the X, Y & Z axes relative to your position (as Kenned would have been from Oswald's alleged vantage point on the sixth floor) - good luck. Way, way back in WWII Britain's SOE department launched project "Anthropoid" - which was an attempt to assassinate the head of the Reich Security Main Office, Reinhard Heydrich. It was a risky operation with enormous potential for serious blowback most likely initiated because Heydrich was getting just a bit too close to uncovering his rival, Wilhem Canaris' ties to Britain. The assassins would be operating in occupied territory and therefore couldn't rely a great deal on the local resistance. When SOE looked at Heydrich's schedule they very quickly came to the conclusion that there was only one opportunity to get close enough to Heydrich to make a successful attempt on his life - a tight, hairpin bend in the 8th District of Prague where the car would have to slow to a crawl. Anywhere else and Heydrich was moving much too fast. But even at such a low speed the British believed a gun or a rifle stood very little chance and so they opted instead to use explosives which could be tossed into the car. The Czech assassins failed to kill Heydrich outright - but they wounded him sufficiently for an infection to take hold and he would die soon after in hospital.
If a conspiracy existed to murder JFK whilst he drove through Dallas the planners would undoubtedly have thought a lot about the British attempt on Heydrich. Which means they'd have to find a place where they could slow Kennedy's motorcade to a speed where the assassins stood a very, very high chance of success. Remember, this plot MUST succeed. If Kennedy somehow survived the retaliation - led by his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, would be swift and brutal. The probability of success could be raised by increasing the number of assassins (something the British couldn't do in Prague as the risk of being blown in occupied territory was very high) - but regardless of how many fire teams were thrown at the problem they HAD TO slow that car down to a speed where JFK was vulnerable.
Now - Google the Sixth Floor Museum's interactive map of the motorcade route from Dallas Love Field - through the City of Dallas - right up to the Trade Mart building where Kennedy was scheduled to hold a luncheon. There was only one location on that entire route where Kennedy's car was in a position where a shooter stood an excellent chance of making a kill shot - the RIDICLOUS turn from Houston onto Elm - (another hairpin!), just like in the Heydrich case. Everywhere else Kennedys car was on a straight track with only a handful of turns which could be taken at much higher speeds. The interesting thing is - such an extreme turn was completely unnecessary because Kennedy's route could have been moved one block north onto Elm (which ran parallel to Main Street) and it would be a clean run straight through to the Stemmons Freeway and north to the Trade Mart. Why was the route changed? According to the Secret Service it was so "more people could see Kennedy moving through the city". Whether that was true or not - by changing the route to include that slow hairpin bend they were putting the President in mortal danger. Who changed the route? No one knows. Who ordered the secret service detail away from his car? We don’t know, but we know it wasn’t Kennedy.
How does this relate to the central question? Well, you're asking people to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald (who knew at the time of being hired that Kennedy was about to visit Dallas but had no way of knowing the route) just happened to find himself YARDS AWAY from the ONLY location on that TEN MILE route from Love Field to the Dallas Trade Mart where Kennedy would be in mortal danger because of the extreme slow speed needed to make the turn from Houston onto Elm. This makes Oswald either the luckiest assassin in modern history or precisely what he said he was - a "patsy" who was artfully moved into position to take the fall by the only people who had the power to put Kennedy's motorcade in that precise spot.
We know Oswald allegedly missed the last man he allegedly tried to assassinate, a lieutenant colonel who got fired for accusing Kennedy of treason. Strange that Oswald allegedly got away with trying to assassinate a military CO. who hated Kennedy, then apparently assassinated the man he hated.
We also know that he was under surveillance from the fbi and they were “looking” for him, similar to the 911 hijackers. We also know he had proven links to the CIA, again similar to at least 2 of the 911 hijackers. The CIA was following Oswalds movements in Mexico and creating their own versions of his movements. George de mornschield says he was instructed by the CIA to befirend the Oswalds stating that as an elderly rich member of the white russian community in Texas he would have zero reasons to befriend a broke young marxist like Lee, and then you have Ruth Paine the self proclaimed "quaker" who had deep ties to the CIA, who also befriended them.
We also know that Jack Ruby had proven links to the CIA, in particular a senior agent in the MK Ultra program called West, who was the last person to see Ruby alone in his cell before he was declared insane. We also know Ruby didn’t appear to know what was going in immediately after he killed Oswald.
We also know that a lot of people (at least a dozen or more) connected with the assassination were either murdered or died in very mysterious circumstances in the months and years after the killing.
We also know that the 1978 senate select commission on assassinations found that he was probably killed by a conspiracy.
An awful lot of coincidences for a lone gunman.
@@StoutProper Dude you wrote all that long gibberish .it was a hit carried out by the mob put enforce by the CIA.
you took a very very long time to say nothing new @@StoutProper
@@StoutProper You are so ill-informed you seem unaware the HSCA was all set to conclude Oswald acted alone until those acoustics experts came forward with their dictabelt recording, which was subsequently discovered to be erroneous and invalid as evidence. This was soundly debunked more than 40 years ago!
You are lying about the route being changed, about deMohrenshildt, etc. The rest of your assertions are just crackpot paranoia.
Where there is confusion there IS DECEPTION.
Nice👍
confusion was instilled by the conspiracy theories.
What a great Documentary may the truth come to light someday
Find out the truth of why Ruby shot Oswald, you solve this entire ordeal.
Right? Why don’t we have any focus on why HE was shot?
He said he didn't remember why, that makes you wonder, it all makes you wonder
I’ve been researching this case for 30 plus years. This perhaps the best explanation on this segment .although he didn’t say anything about the Zapruder film being altered. The presidents limo came to a near stop before the driver hit the gas again. Had he not stopped it may have saved the presidents life.
I thought of the simplest way for the grassy knoll shooter to get away would be to jump into the trunk and no one would think to look in there. This came to me a couple years ago. Im glad to see that he came to that possibility as well.
I would have liked to hear his take on the ‘’magic bullet’’.
Great job.
Film was in custody, processed and copied way too fast to have been screwed with.
What, exactly, was Plan B if other films turn up that contradict an altered Zapruder film and just confirm a conspiracy exists?
"No one would think" to seach the cars in the parking lot???
No bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle.
Connally's said the shots all came from behind.
Witnesses under the sixth floor window said the shots all came from overhead.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Anybody firing a rifle on the knoll would have been absurdly obvious.
Nobody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@aaronz7056 no bullets or fragments were found that didn’t come from Oswald’s rifle? Well duh, they didn’t want any any evidence that would suggest another shooter. The limo at Parkland was washed out and any fragments that were there were taken by the SS.
Connally never believed the “magic bullet theory.”
Of course the people under the sight floor window woukd say that. The people over by the grassy knoll, and watching from the over pass hear shots and saw smoke come up in the area of the fence and trees.
Who’s, the autopsy was totally covered up. Where do you get that the autopsy proved all the shots came from the rear? If so, tell me how the back of the presidents head was blown out? Don’t even say it wasn’t. 25 or more ppl saw the head wound and in any court that would be plenty of evidence.
Obvious huh, well to a certain extent he was. As I said smoke was seen rising from the fence, I even have a picture where you can see it. There were men behind that area dressed as Dallas police. Then there were men flashing badges that showed the were SS which is impossible because only SS was on the limos. The purpose of these men was to keep anyone walking back there and seeing those with a gun. Your last sentence I don’t exactly understand about framing.
@@aaronz7056 the Z film was developed and viewed by SS, FBI and Mr Z. , maybe Sam Donaldson. Right after that LIFE magazine bought the film. They then put it a safe where it was never shown to the public until 1975 on Good Night America. By then there was PLENTY of time to alter it.
I’ll give you an example. Did you know that the driver of the presidents limo braked and came to almost a complete stop? Look it up. Now watch the Z film and tell me where you see the limo stop.
There were a number of people filming and taking pictures. Every film that was taken that day was accounted for and only a few were ever returned. Same goes with everbroll of film, picture that was taken.
The people involved were never let anything get out that could prove conspiracies. They never thought there would be something like the Z film. Imagine today, there are hundreds of smart phones that would capture it.
I hope you have an open mind to someone who’s studied this for 35 years. I’m far from an expert but I try to keep learning. The hardest part is to filter the dis information that the z Warren Report people want to push. Peace!
What is magic bullet theory?
This is the best documentary I have seen regarding the JFK assassination.
I have watched the film of the Assassination multiple times. It doesn't matter how you slice it, you can't deny or cover up the fact that Kennedy was shot in the front as well. The evidence up to this point was so stiff that the shots only came from the Depository building. I don't believe it. I believe multiple shots hit Kennedy and from different directions. It is plain as day and undeniable that the killing blow didn't come from behind but rather from the front and I could determine that without the other ignored evidence from eyewitnesses seeing gunsmoke and/or hearing gunshots from the grassy knoll. I dont know what kind of idiots, who ever cooked up the official reports, thought we the people are, but I have to agree that the truth needs to truly released. But then again Former President Trump, when he took office in 2016, declared he would release all those documents and files on the JFK Assassination that the government has kept underwraps all these decades but then suddenly...he retracts his declaration. That tells me right there that the evidence is so shocking and so heavy that not even Trump would allow those files to be released. It must be something too dangerous to be released that easily as it could open up a bigger can of worms than just the JFK Assassination alone.
I mean, I don't wanna go too far here, but when we click on the video, it goes blank- what should we think?
In my younger days my friends and I had access to a drain in the gutter . This gutter was located where a busy street ended at a T . We would get bags of popcorn together with a straw and spray the cars at the stop with popcorn. Nobody ever looked in the gutter. Kennedy's head was facing down yet the shot blew the back of his skull onto the trunk of the limo. I know where that shot came from.
At last!! Someone with a brain.
You are 100% correct.
They said the angles don't work but I would love to take a trip and stand in it and see if the angles would work cause I don't trust anyone
there's a upload on u tube where a man did his own research using back then a old computer to work out the damage done to jfk's skull and he worked out that the shot from the front right came from the storm drain on the right side of jfk, plus in 1963 the opening in the drain was so much larger than what others have tried to test that theory, so even with a pistol you could aim and shoot which is why the 2nd shot to jfk's right temple area was so different, most rifle sounds are the same meaning that are two sounds ,the bullet moving faster than the speed of sound,which is the crack you hear and then a bang, so maybe it was a shot from the drain, who knows till a real investigation is done with modern forensics' and testing everything for powder residue in various areas, we will never know really other than jfk was murdered by professional shooters / military snipers & NOT LEE H OSWALD at all?
Lies again? CFK JFK
ABSOLUTLEY.
CIA and FBI had involvement.
Sandra Styles and Vickie Adams were on the staircase at 12:30 and 12:31 and saw nobody. Baker and Truly found Oswald on the 2nd floor at 12:31. This proves Oswald was innocent and was on the 2nd floor during the killing. Had Oswald been on the 6th floor he should have been pounding down that staircase and ran smack into those 2 girls.
Or into their boss Dorothy who went after the two ladies. His paraffine test was negative. There is no explanation for.
Error.
One witness saw a black guy on that floor. Conveniently not taken seriously by anyone who could or would do anything about it.
What an amazing satisfying video! Great amazing work guys‼️‼️‼️‼️
A very good documentary covering the science and technical details of the assassination.
Several shooters were involved. They all hoped to get away without detection. Oswald didn't so he was going to take the fall. But he knew WAY too much so he had to be taken out. So Ruby took care of it.
There is no evidence that anyone was involved besides Oswald.
Let me help you all out here. If your youngest then 50 you are clueless on what really happen. Oswald couldn't hit a barn 10 feet away with a shot gun. Let's get that out of the way. Oswald was nothing but a fall guy. So much so Ruby was hired to kill Oswald. Ruby DID NOT die from cancer. He had a chemical induced heart attack in his cell. LBJ hated the Kennedys with a sick passion. Linden Johnson was at the head of all the murders. He even had little Robert Kennedy assassinated. Think hard on what I wrote here. Just fallow the war dollar and you will learn for yourself
I believe he was the fall guy and the other guy was hired to kill him, and No way did he die from cancer. It's all too convenient. I've always believed that JFK knew too much and they murdered him like his son.
I would probably settle on the one nut job theory if it wasn't for Ruby blatantly throwing his life away before Oswald got a chance to realize he was set up (he may have realized it when he was shot). I don't care how upset or patriotic you are, you don't go and shoot anyone in a police station in front of the entire world with no possible escape unless you are some sort of schizophrenic or you are under some severe threat (family member will be killed if you don't do it, etc.). Then there is Oswald's phone call which most people don't know about. If you're interested look up Oswald's last call.
Ruby was not playing with a full deck, he could have made any public statement he wanted or begged protection for family members (none of whom were ever threatened) at any time or during his public trial. For a guy under threat, Ruby made no attempt to get Oswald during the press conference, brought his pet dog along on Nov. 24, and spent his last minutes of freedom standing around in line in a Western Union office on a minor business errand at exactly the time Oswald was already supposed to have been transferred.
The "Oswald call" is a red herring that didn't happen. Ruby was indeed a mentally disturbed and impulsive person. He loved Kennedy and was proud for what he did.
Ruby was mobbed up and it has been an open secret that the government has worked with the Mob for decades! Ruby's sister states he uwas so upset about it, becuse Oswald had hung out at his club a few times, that he was ordered to do it. The evidence also points out that Ruby ws taken out of th jail and went to Israel to live out his days. A woman who knew Ruby well, saw a news report and Ruby was in it boarding a plane going to Israel and she had no reason to lie about it!
@@cactusqltr But that woman did lie. It is well known that Ruby died in prison. The story that Beverly Oliver made up about seeing Oswald at Ruby's club is a lie too. Oliver just wanted some attention.
@@eameece Look, I know people who lived there and children grew up teaching them what they saw with their own eyes, knowing Oswald didn’t do it! I was a child myself but knew when they gunned Oswald down like that, it was a typical cover up! People aren’t as stupid as these murders of presidents want us to be and why they continue to hide information! If Oswald was alone, release ALL the records! But they won’t! Murdering someone is easy. It’s the cover up that gives you away!
Of all the JFK documentaries
I saw this appears to be the
Most Elaborate Comprehensive
and Analytical.
🙏🙏🙏
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
Kennedy's exit wound clearly seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Those witnesses had a clear view behind the fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions and with different guns.
I was in Dealey Plaza in July of last year and saw Josiah talking to someone for an interview..could’ve been for this documentary..I also saw Bill Newman there talking to someone too..Mr. Newman still tells the same story till this day.
But apparently, the Newmans charge $500 if you want to hear their story.
@@kscott2655 I guess I got it for free..
@@patrickrang9525 wow. What an exciting story.