Assuming he had some kind of sprocket/chain upgrade. My 04 R6 had a 520 conversion and the speedo was off and when I topped out it was 174 lol. I weigh 110 and I am 1000% sure I did not go 174 MPH. Great vid and nice bike. Blue looks toooo good on this.
I'm glad you did include that first portion of the video. Because when you mentioned the acceleration verses the top speed formulas, that made me subscribe 😅
2:00 - Not true. Weight does affect top speed. This formula is very rudimentary and doesn't take friction into account. The formula for rolling resistance is Fr = c * W. Since weight plays a role in the rolling resistance, it also plays a role in what your top speed will be. Otherwise, according to your claim; an underpowered 250 HP semi with a 40000 KG load going up a 10% incline would with a tall enough gear ratio be able to overtake a Bugatti Chiron Super Sport going 300 MPH.
@@Mikkel111 Assuming rolling resistance is negligible, top speed means the speed in which the rate of acceleration provided by engine power is equal to the rate of deceleration provided by drag. If the rider is hypothetically 300 kg in mass, top speed will still be the same, but the acceleration to get there remains same.
@@joshuarenacia694 Your assumption would be foolish. No, top speed would not be the same. It's literally as simple as looking at the equation provided. If friction is != 0, the top speed will change. According to your claim, if you were to apply the brakes, you'd still have the same top speed, as you apparently only want to account for aerodynamic drag - again, foolish.
@@Mikkel111 You are right, though. In cases comparing to bikes with the same power, but testing it with 2 different guys - one at 140 lbs and the other at 190 lbs- the weight differential that will result in varying rolling resistances is negligible. At normal conditions, such as observed in this video, that rolling resistance differential could not make any significant effects to the rate of deceleration produced by the bike's shape. I am not saying you wrong. It is just that the primary factor that is in the role of this bike's top speed is aerodynamic drag, in these conditions.
As a Kawasaki ZX6R I’ve hit 170 indicated !! We all know the Speedos are way off, you be riding 90 indicated and you know the traffic around isn’t doing 90. Most likely their doing the posted 75 plus a little. I get tired of the guys that think the Speedo’s are anywhere near to accurate. To me the worst offenders are the Europeans.
Great video and props to you for checking with the GPS that's what a real man do. However, claiming that weight doesn't affect top speed, I have a hard time understanding that. If you tune a car or bike and it increases it's power by 10% it will add some top speed, the vehicle produces more power at the crank and at the wheels. The same applies with weight, by having less weight you get more power at the wheels. By being a heavyweight your bike produce less WHP. Of course gearing can be an issue but if the engine can't come to the limiter and the gearbox isn't limited to a set number of rpms, then more power will help the engine come near or attain the limiter, thus providing more speed. My 2 cents
@@ravedisc of course a drastic difference in weight will have an affect. I’m talking about the difference between a 150lb rider and 170lb rider. Difference is negligible. Comes down to gearing and tune. Although if a bike makes 120hp it makes 120 hp. It’s not going to magically make 130hp with a lighter rider that’s not how that works. Weight affects friction (whp) but that is also negligible unless you’re talking 200+ mph purpose built roll bikes… friction is still a bigger factor than weight. Wind resistance, bearings, chain, brakes, etc.
Decreasing weight does not increase power. That doesn't make sense. What it does do is increase power to weight RATIO, which again, has no bearing on top speed. Over 99% of all forces exerted on your vehicle at top speed is drag. Drag doesn't care about mass. Now, where weight (mass) would come into play is when there is a slope. If there's an upwards slope, then a heavier vehicle will have a lower top speed than a lighter one (because you're no longer fighting just drag, but also gravity), and if there's a downward slope then the heavier vehicle will actually have a HIGHER top speed than the lighter one (because gravity actually accelerates you more through drag, hence why a feather shaped metal object will fall faster than an actual feather).
@@mikehawk6918 it doesn't increase power to the engine, but to the wheels, which in fact means there's less waste of power and thus it is more powerful, even without having more engine power. The rest, I can agree on many points.
That dude is always on Moto Madness riding like a moron and giving us a bad name. Anyway, nice Daytona. I have a 2014 and I absolutely love it. Ride safe
this top speed makes sense, very good discussion about the drag. my striple675r only goes 140 fully tucked (based on online data ;]) due to the lack of aero. hard to do the math without testing the frontal area of each bike, wish that data was out there for the pickings, but there's a whole slew of equations you can use to calculate the drag force and relate it to top speed using the gear ratios... ride safe y'all, don't replicate this RIDE 5 gameplay on a greenscreen :(
Subbed because ya seem like the epitome of a cool triumph motorcycle owner, and because right now I'm oozing over if I should start setting money aside for a Daytona 765 or a 675, and yours is super beautiful
@@BlueDevilMoto On my STRS, It's a super smooth and Flat Torque Curve, which is perfect for street use, so I think it would be an awesome track bike, but when I get one, I think I'd use it for mostly Canyon Carving 🇬🇧
I have an 09 675 daytona and im going to gps it aswell but my bike will do well over 170 on the dash so this makes me want to know how far off my speedo is i thought 170 on the dash was normal for anyone
@@BlueDevilMoto wtf dam I have had too pull two off just had a carbon one on and it split at the frame I’m gonna get a new oem one but this is the second one that has split at tha same place hopefully the third don’t do the same there not cheap
yeah my gsxr 600 l0 says 172 on dash on go pro says 163mph sooooo yeah, dyno and remap with full system and a lot of weight reduction making 108hp at the wheel, people have no idea about actual speed they follow their speedos like sheep
A whole 100mph faster than my Grom pegs out at 💀 good stuff bro!! Stay safe out there, we'll have to link up soon!!
😂 fs I gotta see the grom!
Assuming he had some kind of sprocket/chain upgrade. My 04 R6 had a 520 conversion and the speedo was off and when I topped out it was 174 lol. I weigh 110 and I am 1000% sure I did not go 174 MPH. Great vid and nice bike. Blue looks toooo good on this.
My Daytona definitely does 245mph so might wanna check ur gps pal
🤣🤣 let’s race
Got ya beat lol 250...💯💖🙏✊
He means 245 kmph
The Daytona should top out at 270 kph roughly
245mph?? Dude 1000cc don't even do that you tool 😂😂😂😂
I'm glad you did include that first portion of the video. Because when you mentioned the acceleration verses the top speed formulas, that made me subscribe 😅
It’s important to understand how things work 😂
Man.. 0:18 love those halo shield charge sound effects
@@johnny_boi77 RIP the old intro 🥲
That was great!! I thoroughly enjoyed that video😀 Thank you
2:00 - Not true. Weight does affect top speed.
This formula is very rudimentary and doesn't take friction into account.
The formula for rolling resistance is Fr = c * W. Since weight plays a role in the rolling resistance, it also plays a role in what your top speed will be.
Otherwise, according to your claim; an underpowered 250 HP semi with a 40000 KG load going up a 10% incline would with a tall enough gear ratio be able to overtake a Bugatti Chiron Super Sport going 300 MPH.
I stopped doing word problems after I graduated. Thanks for the info though.
@@BlueDevilMoto Not a word problem, but an example of the flawed logic applied.
@@Mikkel111
Assuming rolling resistance is negligible, top speed means the speed in which the rate of acceleration provided by engine power is equal to the rate of deceleration provided by drag. If the rider is hypothetically 300 kg in mass, top speed will still be the same, but the acceleration to get there remains same.
@@joshuarenacia694 Your assumption would be foolish.
No, top speed would not be the same. It's literally as simple as looking at the equation provided. If friction is != 0, the top speed will change.
According to your claim, if you were to apply the brakes, you'd still have the same top speed, as you apparently only want to account for aerodynamic drag - again, foolish.
@@Mikkel111 You are right, though. In cases comparing to bikes with the same power, but testing it with 2 different guys - one at 140 lbs and the other at 190 lbs- the weight differential that will result in varying rolling resistances is negligible. At normal conditions, such as observed in this video, that rolling resistance differential could not make any significant effects to the rate of deceleration produced by the bike's shape. I am not saying you wrong. It is just that the primary factor that is in the role of this bike's top speed is aerodynamic drag, in these conditions.
As a Kawasaki ZX6R I’ve hit 170 indicated !! We all know the Speedos are way off, you be riding 90 indicated and you know the traffic around isn’t doing 90. Most likely their doing the posted 75 plus a little. I get tired of the guys that think the Speedo’s are anywhere near to accurate. To me the worst offenders are the Europeans.
Id say probably 5 to 15 off depending on bike and mods
Just traded my 14 Street triple 675 for a 11 Daytona 675r yesterday lol. Getting used to a different riding position is so weird.
Great video and props to you for checking with the GPS that's what a real man do.
However, claiming that weight doesn't affect top speed, I have a hard time understanding that. If you tune a car or bike and it increases it's power by 10% it will add some top speed, the vehicle produces more power at the crank and at the wheels. The same applies with weight, by having less weight you get more power at the wheels. By being a heavyweight your bike produce less WHP. Of course gearing can be an issue but if the engine can't come to the limiter and the gearbox isn't limited to a set number of rpms, then more power will help the engine come near or attain the limiter, thus providing more speed.
My 2 cents
@@ravedisc of course a drastic difference in weight will have an affect. I’m talking about the difference between a 150lb rider and 170lb rider. Difference is negligible. Comes down to gearing and tune. Although if a bike makes 120hp it makes 120 hp. It’s not going to magically make 130hp with a lighter rider that’s not how that works. Weight affects friction (whp) but that is also negligible unless you’re talking 200+ mph purpose built roll bikes… friction is still a bigger factor than weight. Wind resistance, bearings, chain, brakes, etc.
@@BlueDevilMoto okay, now I can say that we in fact agree. Yes, such weight differences wouldn't have a factually important impact.
Decreasing weight does not increase power. That doesn't make sense.
What it does do is increase power to weight RATIO, which again, has no bearing on top speed. Over 99% of all forces exerted on your vehicle at top speed is drag. Drag doesn't care about mass.
Now, where weight (mass) would come into play is when there is a slope. If there's an upwards slope, then a heavier vehicle will have a lower top speed than a lighter one (because you're no longer fighting just drag, but also gravity), and if there's a downward slope then the heavier vehicle will actually have a HIGHER top speed than the lighter one (because gravity actually accelerates you more through drag, hence why a feather shaped metal object will fall faster than an actual feather).
@@mikehawk6918 it doesn't increase power to the engine, but to the wheels, which in fact means there's less waste of power and thus it is more powerful, even without having more engine power. The rest, I can agree on many points.
What do you use for a microphone? The sound quality is amazing! Also great vid!
Thanks! I use the purple panda mic and the GoPro mic adapter!✌🏼(I always update the list in my desc. when I switch something up)
@@BlueDevilMoto shoulda thought to check there. Thanks!
@@BlueDevilMotobro thanks 🙏
That dude is always on Moto Madness riding like a moron and giving us a bad name. Anyway, nice Daytona. I have a 2014 and I absolutely love it. Ride safe
💙💙💙
@@BlueDevilMoto I topped my Daytona out earlier today and I couldn't get past 154. Granted it wasn't the best road conditions. But 170 haha no way.
@@jasarhamza955 clean injection system and valves calibration, change your spark plugs for good quality and tell me.
this top speed makes sense, very good discussion about the drag. my striple675r only goes 140 fully tucked (based on online data ;]) due to the lack of aero. hard to do the math without testing the frontal area of each bike, wish that data was out there for the pickings, but there's a whole slew of equations you can use to calculate the drag force and relate it to top speed using the gear ratios... ride safe y'all, don't replicate this RIDE 5 gameplay on a greenscreen :(
Subbed because ya seem like the epitome of a cool triumph motorcycle owner, and because right now I'm oozing over if I should start setting money aside for a Daytona 765 or a 675, and yours is super beautiful
Appreciate you! They’re definitely worth it, the most fun 600 in my opinion! I might be retiring mine to the track, got something new otw soon 👀
@@BlueDevilMoto On my STRS, It's a super smooth and Flat Torque Curve, which is perfect for street use, so I think it would be an awesome track bike, but when I get one, I think I'd use it for mostly Canyon Carving 🇬🇧
@@wanabevideographer1613 oh definitely, they’re a canyon killer!
Get a 675 and build it into a 765... there's a guy out there who will do it 👀👀
@@smeff099 definitely thought about that when this motor goes boom 👀
thank you for explaining the top speed and weight thing, now i can buy a ninja 400
Ninja 400 has nothing on this bike!!!
Don’t forget about the engine power output part of the equation ;)
Content is 🔥
💙💙💙
I have an 09 675 daytona and im going to gps it aswell but my bike will do well over 170 on the dash so this makes me want to know how far off my speedo is i thought 170 on the dash was normal for anyone
4:21 you’re welcome ☺️
This is so cool
2009 daytona or 2006 r6 what should i get
@@faaked. you already know what ima say
@ 😭😭😂 ok ok…
Brother,which app u use for gps kmh tracking?
Can’t remember what this one was but there’s plenty on the App Store :)
shieet I'm hella late, but did you tried the stock transmoission too?
I topped mine at 160... BUT I think if you change the sprockets, I'm Mayyy be possible to do 170
What air box do you have to not have it crack both mine have shattered
@@AustinThompson-xb1nm still have the oem airbox, haven’t had an issue?
@@BlueDevilMoto wtf dam I have had too pull two off just had a carbon one on and it split at the frame I’m gonna get a new oem one but this is the second one that has split at tha same place hopefully the third don’t do the same there not cheap
@@AustinThompson-xb1nm are you talking about the airbox or intake
@@BlueDevilMoto the ram air box intake
@@BlueDevilMoto where it bolts to the frame you know how it hold the head lights and whole front subframe up it keeps shattering close to the frame
In the Mcn reviews, it has the 2012 Triumph Daytona R Top speed at 170mph 🤔
What is a driven racing kit?
Chain and sprocket kit
GSXR 750 read 186. tested it with a draggie only hit 171 speedos are way way off on these bikes
Seems pretty slow compared to my ninja 300
Yea I hear this one’s missing a cylinder so that’s probably why she’s so slow
What phonemount du you have?
Quadlock. Would never use anything else.
Safety cloath?
Was a squid back then 😂
675 Daytona stock do not hit 170mph but if upgraded yes it's possible, by the way nice bike dude
yeah my gsxr 600 l0 says 172 on dash on go pro says 163mph sooooo yeah, dyno and remap with full system and a lot of weight reduction making 108hp at the wheel, people have no idea about actual speed they follow their speedos like sheep
Why u gotta go busting bubbles bro 😂
nice vid, but I feel if you lost a few pounds, you might go a little faster
🥺
🥺
for sure put 100 tons on a motorbike and it will only slow it down, it will still get to top speed tho... this man is a genius...
Oh stop it
@@BlueDevilMoto sorry dude just being the devils avocado here...
OK, great bike but wtf is he wearing. No biker jacket or leathers, hope he's got a lid...😮
How am I supposed to feel the wind in my hair with a helmet on brotherrr
Who cares
I do. Its important to put out proper information on bikes you own so those who want to purchase them can take it into account.
Well it's not important because there's just no way this bike can go that fast so it's a stupid video.
So cringeee
No u